Listener supported WNYC Studios. Tis the season for eggnog, and we ask the burning question. How much booze is enough booze? Scientifically speaking, of course. I think the initial interaction occurs when you mix the alcohol with the eggs, but then... It continues to occur over the week's time. It's Wednesday, December 25th, and Merry Science Friday to you all. I'm Sci-Fi producer Rasha Aridi.
A little later this episode, we'll tackle the important question of whether the alcohol in a potent eggnog can reduce the risk of salmonella from raw eggs. But first, what could be more festive than a year's worth of dinosaurs? Writer Riley Black joins Ira to look back on a year in paleontology. The end of the year is traditionally, you know, a time to sum up what's been happening. So why not do that for dinosaurs?
Researchers learned more about T. rex. They learned about the spiky tails of the stegosaurus. how dinosaurs evolved, and more. In an article for Smithsonian Magazine, dinosaur enthusiast and science writer Riley Black rounded up the top dino discoveries of the year. Riley, welcome back to Science Friday. Oh, thank you so much. It's always good to be back. All right, let's get into it. What was your favorite discovery of the year?
One of my favorites is the idea that we have not yet found the biggest dinosaurs that there were. There's a study published in Ecology and Evolution using T-Rex as a model, because it's always T-Rex, right? saying that we found, you know, pretty much like the average largest dinosaurs out there. So for T. rex, if we think about the famous specimens like Sue, they got to be about 40 feet long, probably weighed around nine tons or so.
But there could have been individuals that were up to 70% more massive. And like the top, you know, sort of 0.1% of dinosaur sizes, just like with people or any living thing, there's going to be small ones and large ones and everything. in between. So really these largest examples of even the most well-known dinosaurs we probably have not found yet, and it might take centuries to find. And I just love that idea that there are these superlative examples that we've not yet uncovered.
Well, if they're so big, why are they so hard to find? It is difficult to bury a big body. I don't know this from experience, just from paleontology. But when you have an animal that is that big, even some of the largest dinosaurs that we know about. To bury something that big and have it be fossilized, it requires so much sediment to be moved relatively rapidly to bury that body and preserve the bones.
that usually it starts decaying before that happens. So we really only get bits and pieces. There's kind of a sweet spot in terms of how large you can be to sort of prevent being just gobbled up by a scavenger, but not being so large that it takes forever for that body to be covered up.
We also learned something really cool about stegosaurs, one of my favorite dinosaurs. Those are the stocky ones with the spikes running down their backs and the giant barbs on their tails. Fill us in on what we learned here. I mean, stegosaurs are always favorites, right? They're so ostentatious. I love them. So this was not about stegosaurs itself, but a related dinosaur named Miragaya. And this one had these kind of elongate...
plates going over its neck and down its back and these long spikes going over the hips all the way to the end of the tail. It's a little bit unusual for a stegosaur. And previous studies on Stegosaurus itself found that, you know, Stegosaurus could swing its tail fast enough, hard enough to pierce bone if it had to as a defensive mechanism. It's relative.
didn't have that same power behind it, but a lot of flexibility. So it seems that this animal was using its spiky tail to basically intimidate, to signal. And what we've learned about dinosaur combat and interactions over the past 10 years or so is that many of these... elaborate structures that we used to think of as sort of defensive weapons and things like that are actually social structures. They're for signaling...
to each other and competing for mates or territory or what have you. So it's kind of neat that even though it looks very stegosaurus-like, it was using its tail in a different kind of way. Oh, that is cool. And speaking of stegosaurs... The American Museum of Natural History in New York is showing off apex, what it claims to be the biggest stegosaur ever found. That's right. Apex is a fossil that's currently privately owned. It has a really contentious history. It was purchased at auction for...
perhaps the highest price that's ever been paid for a non-avian dinosaur at auction, you know, well over $20 million. So it's currently at the AMNH. Whether scientists can study it or not is a bit up in the air because normally paleontologists cannot.
study privately owned specimens. That fossil needs to be in the public trust so that generations of researchers can keep going back and testing old ideas and revising previous research or not. So it's a spectacular specimen, but it really kind of gets that. Basically, this problem that we have in modern paleontology where we're having these amazing fossils come off of private lands and going onto the commercial market.
But when they arrive at museums, we're not always able to study them. It's this tension between the academic and commercial aspects of paleontology that's been going on for a few decades now. Let's talk about the little guys for a minute. Paleontologists described a tiny dinosaur related to a species called the chicken from hell. Sounds like a movie. Yes. And I love small dinosaurs because traditionally we were talking about this a moment ago.
We would find, you know, the big ones, things like Stegosaurus and Triceratops and things like that, ones that were sturdy enough to survive preservation. And the little ones we'd usually miss out on. And sometimes museums wouldn't even go looking for them. They'd say, we need a showstopper dinosaur.
our displays and it's really just been recently that paleontology has been going back to these traditional you know uh stomping grounds looking for the little ones so this comes out of the hell creek formation so about 66 million years old
And it's a turkey-sized dinosaur. It would have looked kind of like a parrot with a long tail. You know, aside from living alongside two of its other relatives of different sizes, showing us that these things proliferated in their ancient habitat. You know, living at different sizes, eating different things. It really underscores that some of the probably, ironically, biggest dinosaur discoveries yet to come are going to be among these small species that were traditionally overlooked.
And because they're smaller, are they easier to find, like you were talking about before? So very small dinosaurs, the littlest dinosaurs, are very difficult to find because if you think about the prehistoric world, number one, a lot of things probably want to eat them. Larger dinosaurs probably preyed upon, smaller dinosaurs pretty consistently.
And even if you had a carcass of this animal, so this one's called Eoneophron, if you had a carcass of this little turkey-sized dinosaur in the ancient Hell Creek environment, it is more likely to... break up, decay, be eaten by scavengers, basically destroyed before it has a chance to enter the fossil record. So this has to do with a science called tephonomy, what happens between the death of an organism and its discovery by scientists.
The odds are generally against these very fragile bird-like small dinosaurs, but we do find them. There are circumstances in which they can be preserved. So part of it is just going looking for them, knowing that they're out there. you know, thinking small rather than looking for that big femur. Well, speaking of small, good segue you gave me because I was surprised to read that ants, ants made your list of dino discoveries. Why did you include them?
That's right. This is a little bit of a personal favorite because it has to do with the world's fifth mass extinction. It has to do with the mass extinction that basically... meant that we only have birds. The only living dinosaurs today, the asteroid-caused catastrophe of 66 million years ago.
A study came out this year looking at ants that farm fungus. So if you've seen leafcutter ants in a documentary or at a museum, it's these sorts of ants that basically have evolved agriculture. They tend to fungus and use that to feed. And this new analysis found that this relationship, this symbiosis, goes back to just after that asteroid impact. What was going on at the time was...
Almost all the world's vegetation was burnt up, destroyed, dead in some way. But fungus, fungus proliferated. It was basically eating all the dead stuff that was decaying. And ants looking for a new food source basically switched. to fungus for a little while, started defending it as their own food source and developed this agricultural
relationship. So something that is so close in a matter of cooperation between species today started in the wake of the mass extinction. That means that we don't have T. rex and Triceratops today. Do you have any wish holiday season in the dino world that you would discover or hope to learn next year? Oh, goodness. There's always so much to find. I would love to know. more about dinosaur colors. Like we can figure out dinosaur colors now when we have skin or feathers that...
preserve some semblance of the pigmentation that they used to have, these little organelles called melanosomes. So we can work out some dinosaur colors from that. So I would love to know what colors, I'm just going to pick one of my favorites, an apatosaurus was.
You know, we have the bones, we have some skin impressions. I'm sure there are fossils out there. We can learn something, whether this was brightly colored or drab like the old illustrations or what. And I would love to know a bit more about that. What color were these really big dinosaurs?
Were they blending into their environments or were they so big that they're just completely ostentatious because they're too big to be bothered and didn't mind sticking out? Well, thank you for joining us. This was fascinating. Always a pleasure. Riley Black, science writer and amateur paleontologist based in Salt Lake City, Utah. After the break, looking at advances in eggnogology. Stay with us.
Hi, Ira here, reminding you that Science Friday has a dollar for dollar donation match, which means that any donation made through December 31st will be doubled. So now is the time to head over to sciencefriday.com slash support and make a gift. Our 2025 programming depends on the generosity of our fans and listeners. Again, that's sciencefriday.com slash support and thanks.
Sci-Fi's Charles Berquist is here with an update on an important holiday story. Hey, Charles, what's up? Hey, Ira. This is one you probably remember. So around 15 years ago, we made a couple of videos about eggnog. Eggnog, yeah, you know I remember that. The question of whether or not the alcohol and the old school real cream, real egg drink, not that commercial stuff you buy at the grocery store, was the alcohol and the classic eggnog enough?
Yeah, it turns out there's a lab at Rockefeller University that has this tradition of mixing up a... Big batch of old-fashioned eggnog around Thanksgiving. And then they serve it a couple weeks later at the lab holiday party. So years ago, we asked them about this whole food safety issue, and they tested their nog.
Yeah, I remember that. And didn't they follow up about a year later with an actual controlled study where they deliberately spiked samples of their eggnog with salmonella? Yeah, they were really good sports about this. But the take home is that, yes. If you mix the alcohol directly with the eggs and give it a while to age, the heavily spiked eggnog does seem to protect against bacteria, at least in their small N equals one study.
But as we know, time marches on, science progresses, so we wanted to check back in with them on whether there had been any updates in the field of eggnogology. Dr. Vincent Fischetti is an American microbiologist and immunologist and head of the Laboratory of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Immunology at Rockefeller University in New York. Welcome back to Science Friday. Glad to be here.
So it's been a few years. Does the lab eggnog tradition continue? It does continue, yes. We had a lull over COVID, but it has continued. And have there been any follow-up experiments, advances in eggnogology? No, no. I mean, we've been doing it for so many years. It's an ongoing experiment, basically. And still, everybody has been healthy and fine. Nobody has succumbed to eggnog-related food poisoning.
We've never had an issue except for intoxication. I mean, I should note that, as you just alluded to, this nog definitely qualifies as a potent potable. Yes, it's a very high alcoholic egg nog. But it's very good. It's very smooth. And it sort of sneaks up on you because it is so smooth. I think we can reveal the secret recipe. What's the alcohol blend in there? Well, it's eggs and cream.
Heavy cream, light cream. And then the alcohol is bourbon and rum, dark rum. Okay. So what is the alcohol actually doing physically to the bacteria? How does alcohol kill germs? Well, the way the recipe is designed is that the problem are the eggs. That's where the contamination usually occurs. So when we crack the eggs and we put them into a bowl, then we add the alcohol directly to the eggs. So the concentration of alcohol in the egg concoction is sufficient to...
kill the organisms that are potentially in the eggs or on the eggs. It's actually on the eggs. And how does it actually kill the organism? Is it breaking down the cell wall? Is it doing something else? The alcohol denatures the outer membrane or the membrane of the bacteria. Gotcha. Are some bacteria more resistant to this than others? Or given time, will a good bourbon-run blend kill just about anything? Well, if it's high enough concentration.
kill pretty much most bacteria, yes. It'll get into the cell membrane and denature the cell membrane. And if somebody didn't want to, for some reason, make their nog quite so boozy... Would the sterilization still work, just take longer, or do you really need a certain level of initial oomph for this to work? We haven't tested that directly, but it usually is the higher the concentration of alcohol, the more efficient the kill.
So there's probably a fine line where there's not enough alcohol to really denature the outer membrane, and then you'll run into trouble. So I think this mixture of alcohol and eggs... is sufficient to give enough alcohol for denaturation. But it doesn't work immediately because we noticed in our experiment, the one that is on Science Friday, we made an experimental batch.
where we contaminated it with salmonella, which is usually the organism that causes the infection. And then we followed the concoction over time and found that we got better kill over a week. So it happens slowly. I think the initial interaction occurs when you mix the alcohol with the eggs, but then it continues to occur over the week's time.
You mentioned COVID earlier. You know, we now live in a time where we're thinking about things like COVID, bird flu as well. Does alcohol do anything to disrupt viruses? It would to some degree, but you have to have a direct interaction. with the virus itself. So you can't constantly be drinking in order for it to occur. So that's not going to work. I see.
So when you're not celebrating, part of your lab work involves bacteriophages, viruses that hunt bacteria. Would it be possible to come up with a bacteriophage that targets salmonella or other food bacteria and dose your nog with that for protection? You could, because bacteriophages are harmless to humans. And you could get a concoction of phage that you could add to the solution, to the eggnog, that would eventually kill the...
the bacteria in there. That's certainly possible. But the problem with phage and bacteria is that the bacteria become resistant to phage very rapidly. You know, phage and bacteria have been battling for over a billion years, and nobody wants to win that battle because if bacteria win, then phage, then they don't. have a system by which they can acquire new genes so they can survive in the environment. And phage need bacteria in order to grow. So they've developed a balance.
where the bacteria sometimes become resistant and the phage can still infect those resistant ones because the phage are modulating their genes during this time. So it's a nice balance back and forth, and nobody wants to win. So phage will work for a limited period of time to control any organisms that are in eggnog, but it won't work forever. I see.
So you've pretty much optimized your lab's eggnog situation. Is there any further exploration in this field? Anything that you'd like to investigate? Economic research, not at the point. I think we've done it long enough and with confidence that we've never had an issue that I think the system does work quite well. Well, thank you so much for taking the time to talk with me today. And may all your beverages be safe. Thank you. Have a nice holiday.
You too, Dr. Fischetti. Dr. Vincent Fischetti is an American microbiologist and immunologist and head of the Laboratory of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Immunology at Rockefeller University. Thank you, Charles. Charles Berquist. And you can check out the recipe on our website at sciencefriday.com slash eggnog. That's it for today's show. Tomorrow, we'll take a tour of three community-based ecology projects. We call them Tiny Nature Triumphs. Lots of folks helped make this show happen, including...
Kathleen Davis. George Harper. John Dankosky. Robin Kazmer. And I'm Sci-Fi producer Rasha Aridi. Happy holidays to you all, and thanks for listening.