Bring Science to the Reviewing of Science: Evidence-Based Standards for Peer Review - podcast episode cover

Bring Science to the Reviewing of Science: Evidence-Based Standards for Peer Review

Sep 22, 20241 hr 6 minEp. 194
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Listen to this interview of Paul Ralph, Professor, Dalhousie University, Canada. We talk about what's wrong with peer review — and how to fix it! Paul Ralph : "We don't want reviewers micromanaging style, complaining about the way the study is written. No, what we want — and need — is for reviewers to focus on the methodological details of the study: Was it done well? Are the results likely to be true?" For more, see Empirical Standards. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast
Bring Science to the Reviewing of Science: Evidence-Based Standards for Peer Review | Scholarly Communication podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast