Global Population Decline with Kevin Dolan - podcast episode cover

Global Population Decline with Kevin Dolan

Oct 13, 202359 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

There is a global population decline that could have profound implications for our generation as well as generations to come. Kevin Dolan is one of the founders of the Natal Conference and has a wealth of information on this subject. This is definitely a different episode for the podcast, but it was a fascinating conversation and I know you'll learn a lot.

 

What we discussed:

 

  • Causes of the population decline (2:36)
  • Population decline and its impact on the global economy (7:14)
  • When the population decline began and the factors that caused it (8:04)
  • The rate of population decline in the United States (10:37)
  • The forecasted population and the driving factors for the decline (11:57)
  • Where the population decrease is the most significant (17:33)
  • Causes of infertility and the decrease in sperm counts in males across the world (22:25)
  • Marriage, divorce, and population decline (24:40)
  • The impact of population decline on real estate and investments (29:00)
  • The solution to this paramount problem (34:01)
  • Parenting, cultural beliefs, and demographics (41:49)
  • Addressing population decline through innovation and education (48:41)
  • Spreading the word through the Natal Conference and in local communities (53:34)

 

Where to learn more about Kevin and the conference:

 

If you loved this episode and our podcast, please take some time to rate and review us on Apple Podcasts, or drop us a comment below!

Transcript

Well, hello ladies and gents, Robert Sykes, Keto, savage.com. Today I've got special guest Kevin Doland on the line. He is one of the founders of the Natal Conference that's going to be happening in Austin, TX in December.

And it focuses on the population decline that we are now experiencing globally and in the US And we kind of dive deeper into what that is exactly what it means, what it means not just for us, but also the generations, you know, coming forward, our kids generation, their kids generation. What is contributing to this decline as it pertains to culture and societal shifts, biomedical changes, fertility

rates changing? Not the normal podcast that I've recorded, but a very, very interesting conversation nonetheless. I feel very blessed to have met with Kevin, learned from him, and I'm very excited to relay this information to y'all through this podcast. So without further delay, sit back, relax, enjoy the conversation with Kevin Doland and we are live. Kevin, how are you Sir? Doing great man.

Thanks for having me. Hey, I'm excited to be chatting with you, so we got introduced through e-mail. We have a mutual friend in Barbara who I interact with Aikido Con. She's great friends with Judy Cho, who's an awesome individual. And she was telling me about this conference you have coming up in Austin called the Natal Conference that dives deep into the declining birth rate, hormonal health and just what what we're kind of dealing with as a society there.

So what this is a topic that I feel is widely misunderstood. People don't understand why people don't understand the birth rates decline. This is kind of newer information to the general lay public, is it not? Yeah, I mean a lot. A lot of people are still kind of living in the in the 70s where it was all, you know, Paul Ehrlich, population bombs, Soylent Green.

The the narrative was that the population was gonna explode out of control and we were gonna, you know, run out of everything and living be living in sort of a favela planet. And it's funny you say that because, like my my parents, who obviously have shaped me quite a bit, they're constantly talking about the overwhelming growth in population and how it's, you know, our planet can't sustain that growth.

And that's why they only had two kids, my brother and I, because they just wanted to replace themselves and not contribute to this increased growth rates. But I guess that's totally turned on its head now. Yeah, I mean, basically I I think people. Don't understand. Well, number one, they just don't know that people aren't having kids anymore. Or at least they haven't. I think if you were to, like, ask them intuitively, like, hey, look around you, how many young families do you see?

They'd be like, Oh yeah, it's probably not a lot, but I think that a lot of them are sort of imagining that it's like just their social circle or it's just their sort of socioeconomic class that's not having lots of kids. But it's actually across the board. It's it's every basically every demographic in America is is below replacement fertility apart from not just recent immigrants but recent immigrants like without a high school

diploma. So it's essentially like the the sort of migrant labor class of of immigrant they have above replacement fertility nobody else does. And the the narrative. Among like sort of the right thing you're supposed to say about this problem is like, well, we'll just solve the fertility crisis through through immigration. But Central America and South America as a whole are right at the cusp of replacement

fertility and falling rapidly. So like the the same the same factors that are generating this this population decline in. You know, sort of the developed world, it's it's ramifying to the whole rest of the planet in it. By by 2050, the only countries on Earth with above replacement fertility will be in sub-Saharan Africa. And the reason that matters is because our entire economic system is predicated on stable growth. It's you know, if if you if you go into debt as a business.

And you have expectations of reliable growth it's it's like no problem you can sort of grow your way out of out of the debt. But if that business did no longer has expectations of steady growth and and especially if like the government you're continually sort of renegotiating the debt the the, the cost to service that debt will just explode. It was like, you know, if you if you took out. 90% leverage to start a business or like like down, down payment on your

house, right. If you put 20% down on your house and that house loses half its value, you're like wiped out, you're like in you're, you're underwater you're in the negative right versus if you if you paid cash it would be different. So but our economy is wildly leveraged. Real estate markets are predicated on steady population growth, all kinds of sort of the way that the way that companies. Compute what they what they imagine demand will be in the future.

Everything that we're preparing for is this is this scenario of like steady population growth. And when you break that assumption, so many things collapse. And you, you can see the consequences of that kind of thing in a city like Detroit, where the tax base abandons the city and then you've got these pockets of people living in these essentially abandoned neighborhoods.

And the cost to pump water and electricity and sewer and garbage and everything goes up exponentially on those individuals because the the pipes, you know, it's not like you can just sort of send the water directly to that one house. It's like this huge sprawling infrastructure system built for a much larger population that still has to be maintained and kept clean. Like that's that's a lot of what happened with the Flint water

crisis was you just didn't have. You didn't have the tax base to sustain this infrastructure meant for a larger population and it it can be so. So then not only is your is your property value you know, collapsed because of of sort of the market forces, but also it's like nothing works anymore and the the houses around you are like boarded up and there's like you know homeless people living in them and doing drugs and like

there's this huge. Value collapse such that these homes that used to be just sort of regular middle class homes are like selling for 10,000 dollars, $5000, sometimes even like triple digits, you know, $500.00. So, so it's a real problem. It's it's it's A and and it's it's going to be a global problem like Detroit right now. Michigan is still solvent. the United States government is still solvent. But what if you had that phenomenon in every major city in America?

All at the same time and there wasn't anybody to bail them out. Yeah, that's that's kind of what we're up against. So when we're looking at this like from a a global standpoint actually can you do you have any statistics handy like at what point did the population start to decline it, what what year did that start happening well world. Population is still increasing but we're we're we're basically right toward the top of the curve and it's it's virtually

all. Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East. Why is that you think? Well, essentially the the cut off in terms of like national income appears to be about $5000 per person per year. So if a country is richer than than you know, $5000 per person per year, it's got either replacement fertility or rapidly declining fertility. So it's like. It it, it appears to be the case that it has something to do with with prosperity and opportunity and education and like all these

good things. So it's it's, it's really, it's really a sticky problem to to unravel and and I think you know just basically Africa and the Middle East there's just a lot of development work to go and and and you're seeing it in those countries too they have the, the, the. The slope of the curve, the the the way that their population, their fertility is trending downward. I, I, I could show you the graphs. It looks exactly the same as everywhere else.

They're just starting from a higher baseline. So they're they're basically, you know 20-30 forty years behind the rest of the world but they're going the same place right. And and and that's actually. See, like as as bad as it is in the United States where we have, you know, some infrastructure and some automation and and and, you know, ways of taking care of the elderly. It's going to be way worse in countries that are already poor and already struggling to take care of their elderly.

And then what do you do when instead of having you know five workers for every elderly person, that ratio is inverted? Right. And there's just, I mean it's it's you can it can get really dark when you start having that conversation. So on a global population level, Africa and the Middle East are still contributing to an overall increase in global population, but that trend is about to tip and that the the net effect will be a total global decrease in population by 2050, you said. Yeah.

So in in in 2050 it will be. The only countries that will be growing will be in sub-Saharan Africa and and the population decline overall is going to start in the in the late twenty 20s early twenty 30s. What is the rate of population decline in the United States specifically? So we have roughly like 1.7 TFR. So that's total fertility. So that's that's assuming the number of babies born right now if you assume that every woman had children.

At the same rate that they're currently having children right now, how many babies would that woman have for her entire life? And right now that number is 1.78. Replacement fertility is 2.1, so so that's that's fairly rapid decline. I can give you like the most extreme population decline right now is happening in Korea, and Korea has a point a 0.8 TFR. Which roughly means that for every 100 Koreans alive today, there will be between 4:00 to

6:00 great grandchildren. So that's that's essentially like extinction, right, That's that's the the sort of evaporation of of of Korean culture as it currently exists and what what is the current population estimation like 8 billion or something like that? Yeah, it's, it's, it's around there and it's probably going to top out at around 10 billion, 10 billion and then at 2050, what is the forecasted population at

that point? So it's it's probably going to be around where it is now and declining, but it will be a significant like what what people sort of miss when they talk about population decline is that it's not just that the population will go down, but that the population will go down and get significantly older. So you imagine if we had.

A population the same size but maybe like, you know, 2030% more elderly people who are sort of pulling on state benefits, not able to work and and and not gonna have babies. Yeah, that's the other piece of it. And then and then you've got the young people under those circumstances. I mean, this is what you see in Japan. This what they call the lost decade of Japan. It's not that they like. Mismanage their economy per SE, and that's why they haven't had

growth. It's because they've been in a state of population decline since the 1970s and eventually the workforce gets old. The the power dynamics of the workplace change when when you've got essentially lots of old folks in in entrenched positions who vote and who. Frankly, don't innovate as much as 20 and 30 year olds do.

And and so these young, these young people who are the, the type of young Japanese people who would start families are under this tremendous professional and and tax pressure because they've got to, they've got to pay the bills of sort of the the pensioners and they've also got to work in these environments where there's just like not a lot of room at the top. Not a lot of room to to expand and grow. What do you think the main driving factor is for this decline in population?

Is it just societal changes? Is it economics? Like, what do you think the underlying driver is? I I think a lot of it is just cultural in terms of what we value, what we want. To happen I I think, I think to some extent men and women. The idea of marriage as a as a project where in a man and woman would like mutually trust each other enough to start families that has really broken down. And I mean and and and a lot of it has to do with our different incentive structures. So, like women?

Their 20s are this incredibly valuable time in their life in terms of like career development, in terms of like just just sort of people like treating you well because you're attractive and you're young and it's just it's very valued in the culture and you know you can you can travel and do all these things and that's precisely the time when sort of for for replacement fertility to happen, these women would need to be

like. Finding a fella and and and having babies, which involves a lot of work and a lot of sacrifice and a lot of trust in that guy because as the two get older, you know his his stock doesn't necessarily go down at the same rate hers does his especially if she elects to have like, I mean basically if you want to have more than say three kids. I mean really more than two, but

certainly more than three kids. Eventually the economics of a 2 income family breakdown, it stops making sense to send like 3 or 4 kids to daycare. So a parent's going to stay

home. It's probably going to be mom and and so in order for that to happen, Mom's got to believe that she can trust dad to. Take care of her and the family and and not sort of wield that economic power over her and then when when they're done raising their kids that he'll stick around and she would like like so much of so much of what's happened in terms of like women going to college and starting career has has been about like we this is an arrangement that

we can no longer trust like we it's it's it's no longer. A a a safe bet or a smart bet to like put all your chips in in a man to take care of you and and so I think a huge dimension of that and and basically like so so like we're saying like for any families to have greater than oops sorry for any of any families to have greater than replacement fertility greater than two kids. Someone's got to basically stay home and and and the the family unit has to has to act in

concert. It can't be sort of two individuals sort of autonomously pursuing their own interest like it doesn't work that way. And so go ahead. You think this cultural shift is more prominent in the US? Or is this same phenomenon occurring across all the countries? Oh, it's it's actually significantly worse than like Korea and Japan.

The the the people's skepticism about marriage and family, people's commitment to their career, the amount of time they spend at work and with and with Co workers way higher in Korea and Japan. What about China? What's China looking like right now? Yeah, China, China, very similar. I mean, you know, they had the one child policy and they tried to reverse it, but people had already sort of re.

Calibrated their sort of life expectations to in this sort of sense of what life was about to toward career and and and China by the way is going to have a much harder time with demographic decline for that same reason that we talked about cause like Japan they've got they've got lots of money they've got you know significant automation of their manufacturing significant automation of elder care.

If if there's a best case for demographic decline, it's probably Japan. But China doesn't have nearly the kind of resources per capita that Japan does to take care of its elderly population. And and and yeah, it's, it's very much a, it's very much become an individualist, consumerist culture, the same as the US and Japan and Korea and Western Europe. It's that that appears to be the the common denominator and people people often attribute it

to women's education. They say like that that's what causes fertility to decline and and like Bill Gates Foundation, they'll say like, oh it's actually good, like we need to educate these women so that they'll have less kids because having less kids is is a desirable outcome. But I actually think that. Women's education. In this case, like, I I don't think it's the case that, like, women learn something in college that makes them want fewer kids.

I I think what happens is that attendance in college is a proxy for women embarking on this individual career journey that's just incompatible with having kids. Because when you ask, when you ask women, how many kids do you want to have? Like 95% of them say they want kids and the family sizes once, once, once you have your first child, family sizes are very similar to what they were in

like the 1960s and 1970s. It's it's it's not a problem that like people are still getting married, but they're like electing to have fewer kids. What's actually happening is that people are not getting married and people are just having zero kids. So it's it's this epidemic of. Not not necessarily like fewer kids but unplanned childlessness as a whole people and and and in most cases it's like 10% medical like you know biological

infertility. In 10% of cases it's women who say like, no, I actually, I I chose this. I I I did not want to have. I did not want to have kids. I planned my life around it. This is where we are. But the other 80% of women who don't have kids basically say, like I I couldn't find the right guy or you know, my my other ambitions kind of got in the way and I ran out of time. And it's, it's it's the the vast majority of of childless women.

That wasn't the plan for them. That wasn't what they wanted. And so for me, the solution is and like like a lot of times this, this debate is characterized as sort of like pitting, you know, women's interests against the good of society. But I that's not what what I'm about is like, let's take these women who say they want kids who who, who, who intended to have kids, and let's figure out if we can make that easier for them to do.

Let's figure out if we can open up opportunities or or make it less scary or or less risky to make this choice that's so important to make. I would imagine, I mean if it's it's 80% that's that's cultural phenomenon that that's obviously the the vast majority. I would imagine that medical, you know, 10% chart of the pie there is also growing at a pretty quick rate considering how many people.

And maybe this is because I'm I'm kind of living in a nutrition vacuum so to speak and most of the people I'm talking with are talking in terms of nutrition and fertility rates and whatnot and they're coming at it from the angle of people just aren't as fertile due to. You know, malnourishment, heavily processed foods, things of that nature. But I would imagine that number is growing at a pretty quick clip. No, it absolutely is.

And studies I've seen is basically that that sperm counts are declining by 1% per year, which is that may not seem like a ton, but it's catastrophic over even you know 20 years. And I I I can't remember the exact figure but it's it's something like by by by 20402050 if that trend continues the average sperm count will be 0 essentially. So you'll you'll have half half the population with like no

sperm at all. And so it's it's it's that's that that element of it, the the biomedical element of it is a crisis that's that's going to be a huge problem And it is apparently linked to and I actually think that the psychological side of this and the social side of it is linked to to to the biological side of it.

Like I I think that people's people's hormonal if the effect on their moods, the effect on their their attraction and what like how intensely they feel desire and and the kind of people that they're attracted to that's unambiguously a function of their sort of hormonal environment. And when you mess that up, you, you not only mess up potentially, they're like biological ability to have

children. But maybe you mess up like the guy who, the guy who would have gone up and talked to that girl. Maybe he just doesn't feel it intensely enough and doesn't like, feel confident enough. And all the stuff that testosterone does to a guy just doesn't happen for him. And so he sort of misses his chance. You know, I think it's all interconnected for sure, and it

seems as though. The the people that are having kids, there seems to be a a much greater acceptance of divorce now than there used to be as well. Like that's just in the cards, whereas before it seemingly wasn't as much of an option. So you've the people that are having kids are often times leaving them in broken homes with separated parents. So even though we have fewer kids, they're they're having less of a foundational, you know, good home life to to stem from.

So it's kind of a catastrophic on all fronts it seems. Yeah. And I mean that that that speaks to the the trust issue. Like if you know, there's there's there's a lot of problems with a social stigma on divorce, right. Like, it's not great to to like, shun people, make them feel awful about this really awful thing to begin with. Yeah, but it is the case that when there is a sort of stigma around something like that, it makes people feel more confident in in making the decision.

Like, because because the the the math of, like how hard do things have to get in my marriage before I have to worry about, like divorce. That math changes if there's like no social, no legal, no, no consequences for it, right? Like it does. It's it's just it's incredibly easy to do. And therefore it's like what has to happen? Does it have to be 1 bad day? How How bad does that day have to be?

And then and then you're sort of thinking, you know, the the the young people who are contemplating marriage, they're sort of doing that math and like, well, you know, if it's that easy and it and and and it can really just be this impulsive or this frankly, like flippant decision, then OK, maybe I'll get married if I find the right person. But I'm certainly not gonna set aside my education to have children with this person. Like obviously that'd be insane.

And and yeah, so so people's. People's a bit like I guess where I would sum that up is like social structures that encouraged marriage in the past were not optimal like there were, there were, there were things that were bad about that and and and a lot of pain involved in that. But people having no ability to like count on, count on their their spouse, count on the society to sort of help them

stay together. But there's better ways to help them stay together but but they need help to stay together, right? Totally. And and it it, it actually does matter what the community thinks about marriage. I wholeheartedly agree when it comes to, you know, the economic front, the infrastructure side of things, you know, all that was based on a an increasing growth rate. Are there some?

Benefits to the population decline, Like when you look at it from a food sourcing standpoint, you know, like there's all this debate in my circles around what could we sustainably produce as a species to feed the population with quality nutrition And. And that's why, you know, mono crop agriculture's getting a lot of kickback, regenerative agriculture got a lot of kickback. There's all these different situations in which people trying to figure out how to feed the population at its current

level. If the population were declining as it's predicted to be, could that be a benefit in that regard or is the net outcome going to be negative across the board? Well, I think that it's hard, it's hard to find a variable on which like things will be better for the world overall under conditions of population decline.

You know for for instance when when the like the people who who sort of require the most food aid, the areas of the earth that require the most food aid, it's not necessarily the fact that like they're actually outstripping the carrying capacity of their environment. Like African can feed itself. That's not, that's not really the issue.

The issue is political instability and poverty and and war and all these things that that cause a need for food aid and the loss of human capital and the loss of know how. I mean just you just look at the boomer generation and how much they know about maintaining and developing the infrastructure that all these systems depend on, the, the, the mechanization

of of agriculture. And like, you know, obviously there's problems with industrial agriculture, but like tractors are probably pretty great, right? Like, it's probably good that we have tractors.

Yeah I like tractors and and and combines and and like there's there's all sorts of elements of modern agriculture that that potentially become harder to make and and and harder to maintain as the as the know how to maintain them dies out and and isn't necessarily passed on. Now I will say like there are there are going to be winners and losers right in in every situation. Like I don't, I don't think there's there's anything that's going to be great for the whole

planet with this problem. But people who have technical skills and skills and automation, they're going to be in higher demand. People who companies that invest in elder care, they're going to be in higher demand. And that's one of the things that I want to do at the conference. I want to, I want to address like, yes, are there global solutions? Are there, are there big picture things we can do to solve this

problem? But as individuals are there investments that we can make that will make our families better off under these conditions because it's going to be really hard for for everybody. But but there's still smart investments you can make. I mean for for one thing this is maybe a a a perfect example of this is like the real estate market.

Like the problem is going to be that the real estate market is just not going to be a store of value the way that it was for our parents and our grandparents because the sort of periphery of all these cities is just going to hollow out as there's just no kids to raise families in them. But the upside of that is real estate will be cheap. It's you know for for every, for every seller there's a buyer, right? Like there's a there's a there's a buyer side to that equation.

So. So yes, certain things will get will get less expensive and and easier to obtain. So the the gap between the haves and the have nots will likely increase substantially. Yes. Yes, that is absolutely the case. I mean because you know, you sort of imagine the what was the smart move if you lived in Detroit as it was hollowing out. Well, you'd want to sell your house as quickly as possible.

And if you couldn't if you couldn't sell it and and basically you'd be selling it at A at A at a a pretty serious loss to go move into you know the core of the city where the infrastructure's a little bit better and there's you know sort of police protection's a little bit easier to get. And and I I essentially see that that as being a trend across the board as populations decline they're gonna, they're gonna sort of abandoned the periphery of the cities and move closer to

the center. Which means if you're sort of the the people who own that extremely this the the the real estate that's extremely high value in the core of these cities will probably stay extremely high value. And a lot of middle class people whose retirements depended on sort of the value of their suburban home are going to have a real rough ride. Yeah, I'm, I might be doing the exact OPS. I might be moving out in the

country even further. Well, right and and that's that's sort of the IT, it depends on like what kind of a bet you're making, right? Like if, if, if the bet you're making is is like your home as a financial investment that's you know iffy. But if if you're, if you're trying to get out to the country so that you can be more sort of self-sufficient, more independent, you know connecting with a different kind of people that's that's a whole different story, right. Like that's sort of a non

financial decision. So so what's the solution to this this pretty paramount problem and like what do people need to do individually and what do people need to do, you know, in tandem with society? Like what what is the what, what catalyst can be can be activated to make this trend improve upon

itself? Yeah. So essentially the the most important thing in my opinion is to get together with other people who care about this and and who are you know like I I I guess to to be frank it's like you need to find people who want to have kids so that you can have like if you're if you're single you need to be around the kind of people who want to have a family which is increasingly sort of hard to find and and the kind of people for whom there's

like a framework in which marriage and and and children make sense. And if you have a family and you have kids as I do, I want to be around other families that are raising their kids with the kinds of values that produce kids who want kids because I want my kids to have kids of their own. And and so I think sort of what what I'm the basic thing I'm trying to accomplish with the natalism conference is just to shoot up a flare and say hey is

anybody else out here. And and we've had, I mean the the guests who are going to be attending this conference are really spectacular. We've got geneticists. We've got demographers. We've got you know culture commentators and and people who are really concerned about this issue and have a lot of expertise and a lot of understanding of how how it works and how it's going investors and and we're going to be getting together to try to solve this problem globally but also individually.

And I think that that alone is a huge part of the solution. It's just sort of connecting with other people who care about this. But in terms of like policy prescriptions, I think you have to de risk marriage and family a little bit and you know the the the the traditional ways of doing that of just like sort of being cruel to people who do it

is is probably not the solution. But there's but there has to be some way of of making it reforming the the sort of legal arrangement of marriage such that it's less risky. I think you also have to address the way people find partners. I mean Tinder, the whole business model of Tinder is you know the the moment that you're happy, they lose you as a

customer, right. And so the incentive is to keep you on this treadmill and and as as sort of as sort of like sad and lonely as possible and and so we've we've got a guy coming to the group who's a a founder of a novel dating app concept. Those kinds of like cultural solutions I think I think are going to matter quite a lot. I do think that there's we've got, we've got you know some some medical professionals coming who are going to talk about the biological infertility

issue. So basically it's about finding the people who already want kids and are struggling to have them because there's a lot of them like that's that's you know if it's 80% of of so, so it's 40% of millennials are not going to have kids which is a crazy number. It is crazy. That's that's my, that's my generation, my high school graduating class.

I'm 36 and and my high school graduating class is basically, you know, kind of coming to the end of the the the women's sort of main fertility window where they're likely to have kids. Particularly if you haven't had one kid by, like if you had one kid by then having another is not so hard. But if you've never had a kid by then, it's really, really challenging to have your first at that age.

It is strange. I mean like you were talking about earlier the just the societal pressure and incentive for young females to have this very career minded focus that often times does not equate to rearing a family. Like I look at my my wife and you know we have a son, 15 month old son. We're planning on having more but it's like it seems as though you know her raising.

Him staying at home that that that seems to be a very, you know, non traditionalist approach these days where it's it's pretty pretty traditional when you think about it. You know if you rewind the clock to like the parents generation, but like that is not the norm these days. It seems like it's it's been rather difficult for us to find other people of the same age demographic that are in a similar chapter in life, because that just doesn't seem to be the

norm. Right. Right. And and it it's one of the things that demographers have found is that fertility is highly contagious, that you know it one lady in the friend group has has a baby or becomes pregnant and then all of a sudden like three or four in the in the friend group. Like that's something that people have anecdotally noticed. But like demographers have looked at the data and they've been like, no, that actually happens.

And so I think there is a lot of value in sort of tipping over the scales there a little bit and and you know, making it higher status to do and 'cause I mean like the the sort of the the mean. Well, it's like we we sort of talked about the cruelty behind like enforcing marriage norms, but there's also a cruelty behind you know, enforcing these

career norms as well. I mean you know my wife has been treated with pretty serious disrespect by some people for her decision to to to raise our family and and I think, you know it's I don't know if that's like a just a law of the universe that you just can't you can't escape that people are just going to be mean no matter what the rules are. But, but yeah, I think the more you can surround people with an environment where it is high status and it is, you know.

It's talked about why it's why it's cool and and and and the value of it. It's really easy to complain. And I I think, I think part of the problem is that like complaining about your family and complaining about how hard it is and and like what a what a hero you are for enduring it.

That's sort of the the the popular narrative around raising a family for men and women and and so I just I don't know I I me and my wife when when people talk about like oh boy you guys sure have your hands but we have six kids wow boy you guys. You guys sure have your hands full.

You know my wife always is like yeah it's great it's it's wonderful have these these beautiful kids and to to just sort of never succumb to the because you know what people are expecting you to do they're they're sort of expecting you to to to put on those sort of exhausted like Oh yeah let me tell you about it. And I and I think just not doing that makes a difference to be honest with you.

I've definitely had people that I've met who've who've, you know, meeting my kids gets them excited about having kids. And it's like, and that makes me feel great because I feel like I'm doing a good job. If I've got these kids that that that are sweet and and good and happy and you know. They'll be. They'll grow to become contributing members of society. I mean that that is key.

I mean, I look at what my wife is doing and I'm just incredibly proud to see her raising our son to the extent that she is. And it's nothing but respect that I have heard. Like I don't try and hold her under my thumb by any means. And I don't feel like anybody should do that. It's just such a. Cultural, societal shift that's occurred. And I don't want to say that, you know, I don't want to place judgement on anybody else. I mean, everyone has to find their own life path.

But I feel like there's certainly should be no disrespect associated with the woman that decides to stay home and take care of the kids because that is a incredibly demanding job in and of itself. And if you're raising quality kids, I mean, it takes a ton of effort. Yeah. Yeah, absolutely. And I think part of the problem is that we have sort of embraced an idea that if if work is worth anything, you ought to get paid.

And there's this whole I mean and and and you can see why why governments why businesses would want people especially women to think that because if if if your wife is is raising kids and educating them and and and being involved in your community. She's not paying income tax and she's not generating all this demand and she's doing she's doing things for free that otherwise a corporation might be able to monetize.

And, and so if they can, if they can capture all of that energy that she's generating and all of the good that she's doing and turn it into like revenue for the daycare, revenue for the TV dinners, revenue for, you know what I'm saying, Like just sort of all of it being taxable, you can see why there's an incentive to encourage this narrative of like, oh, no, you should, you should be at work. That's where the real you know, that's where real life is. Yeah, how much of this, this.

This may be a a slight detour here, but. How much of this do you think is ingrained in like biblical beliefs and things of that nature? Because it's, I mean, I'm in Arkansas, so I'm like in the middle of the Bible Belt. So this seems to be a lot more accepting for those traditionalist minded people that want to kind of stay more in line with that philosophy of, you know, parenting and raising kids, you know, things of that

nature. Whereas if you go out to like we were just in New York this past weekend, it seems to be that. You know those demographics are much less traditional from a biblical sense and therefore much more prone to not want to have the kids be more career focused etcetera, etcetera.

Like with regards to your approach to this and what not, do you try to keep those completely separate or do you think they're intertwined or how how much of that is is affecting societal and cultural beliefs around having kids? Yeah, I mean I think, I think what is happening essentially is you've got people behaving rationally in the face of incentives and like the the sort of the sort of financial and social incentives are strongly against having children.

And so you need a you need an incentive that is non rational or pre rational. That's like, yeah, this is gonna be hard. This is gonna be harder than some other things I could do, but I'm gonna do it anyway. And I'm I'm increasingly needing some secular people who have found their way to caring about this for other reasons. But yeah, in general I think it's overwhelmingly religious

people. And and I mean like in I, I actually did a little amateur analysis of my high school graduating class of like because because we're we're sort of coming to the end of of our our our childbearing age. And yeah, the the few people who are having three plus kids are first of all it's like it's like 14% of my high school graduating class has three or more kids at this point and they constitute

like 48% of the total fertility. So like the new the next generation that the generation of our children is overwhelmingly represented by the, you know 14% of of of the population that made that choice and they're all religious, all of them. And so it's what will that mean for the culture in, you know, 20 years when those kids grow up, if you can, if you can hold on to them, right, like, like at

least. So the the way that the way that the the sort of secular progressive worldview has reproduced itself for the last, you know, 100 years or so has been by taking the children of of other cultures and and and assimilating them, converting them. So it it's it can't just be that, like religious people have the kids and and and they they get get to keep all them, 'cause they don't. That's not how it works.

Having said that, this, this 14% of my high school graduating class, there was something unusual about them, right? Like that cause 'cause there were lots of religious people. I grew up in Texas. It was, you know, much more than 14% of of my graduating class was was sort of raised in church. But there was something weird about us, this little cadre. And so, like, does that weirdness about us translate into something, like, weird about our kids, maybe even biologically?

That's like, no, these are people who are just way more, like they're way more resistant to whatever whatever has caused people to buy into this story. Maybe, I think, I think that's I think that's likely. I I think you know, the the, the, the types of people that my kids and grandkids are going to grow up knowing is going to be a very different cohort than I grew up with because of who had all the babies.

I think that that's key. I mean, people, it's very hard to have this incredible forward thinking mentality of OK, what is life going to be like for my kids and their kids? But that is absolutely of paramount importance cause like when I look at it from an epigenetic standpoint, I mean the foods that I'm consuming right now and that my wife are consuming impact, you know, the health of my son when he was

conceived. And then that has an antigenetic effect for three generations or more deep. And that's just the nutritional component when you look at it from a societal and cultural component as well. You know what kind of. Kids and peer group are Are my kids and their kids and their kids going to be surrounded by what is the what? What's what's going to make life

easier or harder for them? Like, people don't take the time to think like that, but it's crucial that they do because it's going to be shaped by their decisions today. And if we find ourselves living in a world in which the population is drastically declining and there is no incentive or desire to. Raise good quality kids, have them in a good home, feed them properly and that just becomes the norm. Then that's not gonna bode well for us as a species, right? Right.

And the like. And to be clear like this is this is maybe an admission against interest, but like the incentives against having kids are gonna get stronger because the voting population is going to get older. The the sort of demands on the benefit system are going to get stronger. It's going to it basically. People are going to have to grow up in a our our kids are going to grow up in a in a more challenging economic environment

than we did. And so like to to inculcate the values that they need to still make the decision to raise families under that environment. That's a tall order. And so yeah, basically this is something that I have dedicated myself to pretty much entirely. I mean everything that I'm involved in is is sort of an attempt at addressing this

problem. But yeah, I think it starts with and and and the the conference, the concept for it started when we just thought like hey it actually turns out that we know like you know all these people who were on that documentary, the Tucker Carlson documentary, people who are are interested in this and talking about this. We should try to get just the smartest people we can think of to to get together and address

this problem. So day one's going to be a standard symposium with with panels and and and and speakers and reception sort of mix and mingle. But day 2 is going to be a a structured innovation workshop. So we've got my partner Drew Gorham is involved in Stanford Design School innovation workshops and this incredible tool for like getting the right answers out of people. Getting getting the best from a group.

And so you're going to be sitting across the table from these experts and you're going to be able to like chew on any of these problems whether and it's sort of whichever 1 catches your attention and you think is the most important, whether it's the cultural angle, whether it's the, the biomedical angle, it's policy. It's going to be a really

exciting time. And my and my hope is that that at least you know two or three or four of these initiatives turns into something that you know some of the some of the investors who are going to be in the room will take an interest in and and and pick up and run with. So that's sort of the best way I could think of to to attack this problem. No, I think it's, it's incredibly admirable, man. Like I don't know of anybody

else spearheading this topic. So I think what you're doing is profound and incredibly, you know, importance of significance. Are there any other groups or cohorts doing this or is this kind of like you just grabbing grabbing the bull by the horns and leading the tip of the spear here? Well, so we're the only conference on this topic of which I'm aware, although I will say I think I think Elon Musk recently went to one in like

Hungary or something. So definitely would like to get Elon down here, 'cause he, I know he, I know he's concerned about this issue as well, but but no. So there's another group called pronatalist.org that's run by Malcolm and Simone Collins. They're actually going to be at the conference and they're they're attacking it from the education angle. They they they've they've got a lot of initiatives that they're working on. So it's like we're not we're not all alone out here.

But as far as I know if you if you want to come to like a a, a symposium where the the major thinkers on this issue are going to be in the same room. I I think, I think we're the only game in town. And and when is the conference and how do people listening get involved, get tickets and attend? Yeah, it's it's natalism.org. That's and it's December 1st and 2nd in Austin, TX at the Line Hotel. You can get your tickets there

for either day one or day one. And day two it's going to be, I mean really we we we sort of planned it around like if Elon Musk or Tucker Carlson or any of these other sort of like billionaires who care about this, if they showed up, we'd want to make them comfortable. So it's going to be really high end, great food, great environment and and and just some of the smartest people I'm aware of in the space to to talk to. So it's going to be a lot of

fun. No, I think it's awesome and I think I think you know being forward thinking like this is, is crucial and I appreciate you doing this. It's not, not typically in my wheelhouse of discussion, but it's it's relevant when you look at everything on a symbiotic level and I really appreciate that you're bringing in. All the different components of it. You've got the cultural societal standpoint, you've got the the health and biomedical standpoint.

You have the policy in the governmental standpoint because it all goes in tandem. So I think it only is, it's fitting that you've got all these experts from all the different walks of life coming there to share what they know so that it can all be cohesive. Yeah, it's, it's, it's, it's going to be a really, really good time and I appreciate you having me down to to spread the word because I think, I think, I think your listeners would really find it interesting.

Yeah, I mean you've definitely solidified in my mind the path that my wife and I are taking with, you know, trying to be more self-sufficient, living off the land, doubling down on local communities, finding you know, friend groups and people that are of the similar age, similar chapters in life, doubling down on that. I mean, we're probably going to go the home schooling routes in the beginning for sure and I

think. You know, as the population declines, it's, it's interesting man, I don't know if I'm totally off the wall on this, but we saw this massive increase in growth and technology and awareness, innovation, which is great, but it came at the cost of people just simply being connected on a deeper level. So we've been trying to double down on increasing that atmosphere within our own home and abroad and I I think kind of just really fixating on that and

making it a conscious effort. To to make that your reality and and part of your life is key. So us homeschooling, raising our own food and getting plugged in the community is, is even more important now. I think yeah, I, I, I was having a conversation with a friend of mine who is looking for looking to make some substantial investments and we were talking through because we're we're both pretty committed to this, this

vision of the future. And we said well if if you've got if you need a place to put your money and the stock market is probably going to tank and maybe not come back. The real estate market is probably going to tank and maybe not come back. The dollar is probably going to tank and maybe not come back. It's like where, where do you put this investment, what's what makes sense, what's safe?

And basically the conclusion that we came to was this people, you, you, you invest in whatever gets you closer to the kind of people who are going to help you solve problems because human capital is going to become that's that's the only appreciating asset that there's going to be in the next 100 years in my opinion. Yeah, no, I think. I think investing in relationships and human capital is always a safe bet if you're in a good group of people. So no, I think this is awesome, man.

I'm, I'm stoked. Are you going to have a? To have virtual conferences. I'm gonna be traveling out of town that weekend, but I would love to partake and learn from the speakers that'll be at your event. Is there gonna be a way for people to attend virtually or get recordings of it? Yeah, we're gonna have, we're gonna have recordings available after the fact. So we're gonna, we're definitely gonna be releasing some of that information. The workshops are Chatham House

rules. So that's gonna be because we wanted to be able to have like a maximally open conversation in inside the the group. So. So we're not going to be publicizing day 2, but day one, the speakers and and that kind of thing. We're going to be preparing some some recordings for that. Awesome, awesome. Well, Kevin again man, I tip my hat to you. I appreciate you taking the charge on this, bringing awareness to it. If there's anything that I could possibly do to help, by all

means let me know. I've thoroughly enjoyed the conversation and really enjoyed getting to meet you and dive a little deeper. And one more time. What's What's the website? People can go to yeahnatalism.org. Natalism.org You have like a social profile as well. Yeah, Natalism Org on Twitter. Awesome. Well, I will link out to all those. Make it easy for people to find you. And again, man, I'm going to be, I'm going to be just following along.

You've got six kids. You're a little bit further along on this journey than me, but I respect what you're doing here, so I'm going to be taking notes. Thanks so much. Great talk to you. Appreciate you, Kevin. Take care, man.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android