SO EP:555 Bigfoot Hit By A Truck?

I've personally become involved with the Untold Radio Network. The Untold Radio Network is a live streaming podcast network that airs a new show every day across all podcast platforms, YouTube, and more. They have eight different shows on all sorts of exciting topics such as bigfoot, cryptids, UFOs, aliens, and much more. I even have my own show called Weird Encounters, where I talk about all things strange. This is more

than just a podcast network. It's a community that allows me to meet so many amazing people who share their stories and experiences with strange. If you're interested in hearing more of these stories and learning more about the paranormal and encryptids, make sure you check out the Untold Radio Network for all kinds of exciting shows. It's free to subscribe. So what are you waiting for visit www dot untold radionetwork dot com today.

The discussion, which included some of the most well versed minds in sasquatch research, delved into numerous theories and hypotheses, blending documented animal behaviors, scientific possibilities, and speculative reasoning. Hundreds of eyewitness reports described sasquatch crossing roadways across the United States, often at night, yet not a single confirmed case exists

of one being struck, fatally injured, and recovered. This absence is striking when compared to the millions of animal vehicle collisions documented annually in the US, involving deer, coyotes, wolves, and other large wildlife. As the conversation unfolded, the puzzle became a lens through which we explored the broader mysteries surrounding this elusive creature. To frame the mystery, consider the sheer scale of animal vehicle collisions in the United States.

Each year, over one point five million deer vehicle collisions are reported. Deer are particularly vulnerable due to their behaviors and population density. They frequently cross roads during dawn and dusk, times of reduced visibility for drivers. Moreover, deer often freeze when confronted with an oncoming vehicle's headlights, a reflexive response known as tonic immobility. This behavior significantly increases the likelihood

of accidents. In contrast, predators like coyotes and wolves exhibit more calculated and agile movements, but they too are struck by vehicles, particularly when pursuing prey across roadways. The common factor among these species is their coexistence with human altered environments, which increases their interaction with roadways. When viewed through this lens, the absence of a confirmed sasquatch vehicle collision becomes even

more curious. Eyewitness reports suggests that sasquatch occasionally crosses roadways much like these other animals, yet no remains have ever been conclusively found. To unravel this enigma, one must consider a combination of factors including population dynamics, behavioral tendencies, physical attributes,

and environmental context. A critical factor in explaining the absence of sasquatch and vehicle collision reports is the creatures presumed rarity Deer populations in the US number in the tens of millions, and even wolves and coyotes have established healthy populations across vast regions. By contrast, sasquatch, if it exists, is thought to have an extremely low population density. Most researchers hypothesize that sasquatch inhabits remote forested areas far from

human habitation. This low density and broad territorial range would naturally reduce the likelihood of any individual encountering a roadway, let alone a vehicle. The statistical improbability of such a collision is analogous to rare sightings of endangered species like snow leopards or red wolves. These creatures, despite their large size and active ranges, are almost never reported as victims

of vehicle collisions due to their scarcity. Sasquatch, if it exists, in similarly low numbers, would be even less likely to appear in such incidents, given its hypothesized avoidance of human contact. Sasquatch is often described in eyewitness accounts as highly intelligent, with behavior suggesting an acute awareness of its surroundings. Unlike deer, which react instinctively and often erratically, sasquatch seems to exhibit deliberate,

calculated actions. Witnesses frequently report the creature waiting and watching before crossing a roadway, as though assessing the situation for safety. This apparent intelligence might allow sasquatch to recognize roads as dangerous and avoid them whenever possible. Additionally, sasquatch is often associated with nocturnal or crepuscular behavior, meaning it is most

active during the night or twilight hours. This behavior not only reduces its exposure to humans, but also aligns with its reported ability to move stealthily in low light conditions. Eyewitness accounts often describe the creature appearing suddenly and disappearing just as quickly into the forest, suggesting a mass mastery of its environment. If sasquatch possesses enhanced night vision similar to that of nocturnal predators, it could easily detect approaching

vehicles and avoid collisions. Researchers have speculated that sasquatch may possess acute sensory abilities, such as heightened hearing or a keen sense of smell, which could further aid in detecting and avoiding vehicles. These abilities would grant the creature and advantage in evading dangers that other animals fail to perceive until it is too late. By contrast, sasquatch sightings, of which there are hundreds, if not thousands, paint a very

different picture. Witnesses frequently describe the creature as crossing roads deliberately, with an almost calculated sense of caution. Unlike deer, which react purely on instinct sasquatch appears to assess its environment before moving. It is often seen waiting for an opportunity, then striding across the road in a manner that suggests an acute awareness of the danger vehicles pose. This behavior immediately set sasquatch apart from the wildlife with which were

most familiar. A critical factor in this mystery is the presumed rarity of sasquatch. Deer are abundant, with populations in the tens of millions, making collisions statistically inevitable. Even predators like coyotes and wolves, though far less numerous, have robust populations that increase the likelihood of such incidents. Sasquatch, however, is thought to be exceedingly rare, occupying remote wilderness areas

far from human settlements. If these creatures exist, their population density is likely so low that the odds of a single individual encountering a vehicle are vanishingly small. This scarcity, combined with their avoidance of human activity, might alone explain why sasquatch vehicle collisions have not been confirmed. The discussion then turned to sasquatch's reported intelligence, which might provide another

layer of explanation. Many witnesses describe the creature as displaying behaviors that suggest a high degree of awareness and problem solving ability. These accounts often emphasize that sasquatch appears to understand its surroundings and make deliberate choices to remain hidden or safe. For example, eyewitnesses frequently note how quickly sasquatch retreats into the forest after being seen, as though aware

of the need to avoid human detection. This level of situational awareness could extend to roads and vehicles, allowing sasquatch to recognize them as threats and avoid them altogether. Another fascinating avenue of discussion compared sasquatch to humans rather than animals. If sasquatch is closely related to humans, as many researchers believe, its behavior might align more closely with ours than with

instinct driven creatures like deer or bears. In the United States, human vehicle collisions result in approximately six thousand pedestrian fatalities and seventy six thousand injuries annually. Most of these incidents occur at night, when visibility is reduced. Urban areas, with their dense traffic and high pedestrian activity, account for the majority of these accidents. In rural areas, collisions are less common but often more severe due to higher vehicle speeds

and delayed emergency response times. Humans, despite our intelligence, are still vulnerable to vehicles, but certain behaviors drastically reduce our risk. Pedestrians who exercise caution, waiting for traffic to clear, using crosswalks, or avoiding poorly lit roads are far less likely to be struck. Sasquatch, if it shares our cognitive abilities, may employ similar strategies. Witnesses often report seeing the creature crossroads in areas with minimal traffic, such as remote stretches of

highway or back roads. It seems to avoid high traffic zones and urban areas entirely, further reducing its chances of encountering a vehicle. Another intriguing possibility involves sasquatch's social behavior. Some researchers speculate that these creatures may live in small, close knit groups. If true, it's possible that other sasquatch might actively remove an injured or deceased individual to prevent

discovery by humans. This theory aligns with the descriptions of sasquatch as intelligent and potentially cooperative, capable of behaviors that would make them even harder to detect. An intriguing aspect of the discussion involved the few reported cases in which drivers claim to have struck a sasquatch, only to see the creature rise and retreat into the wilderness. If these accounts are to be believed, they suggest that sasquatch may

possess extraordinary physical resilience. Witnesses often describe sasquatch as massive, with a height ranging from seven to ten feet and a weight estimated at several hundred pounds. Its muscular structure is frequently described as exceptionally robust, with eyewitnesses likening it to an ape or even a bear in terms of sheer physicality. Such attributes could make sasquatch more capable of withstanding an impact that would be fatal to most animals.

Large dense muscles might absorb shock more effectively, while thick bones could resist fractures. If sasquatch possesses these traits, it might explain why it could survive a collision and retreat into the forest before human witnesses could confirm its identity. The natural environment where sasquatch is most often reported also plays a crucial role in explaining the lack of confirmed collisions. Dense forests and rugged terrain dominate sasquatch's presumed habitat, providing

ample cover for a creature seeking to remain hidden. These environments are also effective at erasing evidence. Even if a sasquatch were fatally struck by a vehicle, the remains might quickly disappear due to scavenger activity, decomposition, and environmental factors such as rain or snow. This phenomenon is not unique to sasquatch. For instance, bare and mountain lion carcasses are

rarely found in the wild the significant populations. Nature's efficiency in recycling organic matter ensures that even large animals leave little trace behind. In the case of sasquatch, this process would be compounded by its presumed rarity, and the remoteness of its habitat. Finally, the human element cannot be overlooked. In cases where people have reported striking a large bipedal figure, societal skepticism and fear of ridicule often discourage them from

pursuing the matter. Some witnesses might dismiss the encounter as a mistake, rationalizing it as a bear or even a prankster in a costume. In other cases, the lack of concrete evidence, such as fur, blood, or a body leaves their claims unverifiable, relegating them to the realm of anecdote. Even in instances where physical evidence might exist, the stigma

surrounding sasquatch research often prevents serious investigation. This cultural barrier ensures that many potential encounters go unreported are unexamined, further contributing to the mystery. The absence of a confirmed sasquatch vehicle collision is a riddle that encapsulates the broader enigma

of the creature itself. Whether due to intelligence, physical resilience, rarity, or a combination of these factors, sasquatch appears uniquely equipped to avoid the fate that befalls so many other animals. This mystery not only deepens the allure of Sasquatch, but also keeps the debate alive, ensuring that researchers and enthusiasts

alike continue their quest for answers. As we consider these possibilities, we are reminded of the complexity of the natural world and the tantalizing possibility that some of its secrets remain just out of reach. All these factors, population, rarity, intelligence, physical resilience, environmental context, and human disbelief converge to create a compelling explanation for why Sasquatch, if it exists, has never been definitively strung and killed by a vehicle. And

stay tuned for more sasquatch ott to see. We'll be right back after these messages. The creature's ability to navigate its world with caution and intelligence, combined with its elusive nature, seems to grant it an extraordinary advantage in avoiding the fate that befalls so many other beings. This absence doesn't weaken the case for Sasquatch's existence. Rather, it adds to the allure of its mystery, reminding us that some secrets of the natural world may still be waiting to be uncovered.

The Bigfoot tree structures controversy. On numerous occasions, bigfoot seekers have reported finding curious creations in areas where Bigfoot has been seen. Essentially, they are tepee like structures that appear to have been created by something with intelligence and a great deal of strength too. The latter is made abundantly evident by the fact that in many cases, the branches of the trees used to create these sometimes huge structures

appear to have been wrenched off. In other cases, the branches appear to have been carefully bent over and intertwined. As for why Bigfoot might engage in such curious behavior, the theories are several. At first glance, one might assume they have been constructed to offer the beasts a degree of shelter, and particularly so during the cold winter months. In many cases, however, there does not appear to have been any attempt made to create a canopy or walls.

In other words, the structures are open to the environment and all of its attendant harshness. Other theories are more intriguing. It has been speculated that perhaps the tepees represent territorial markers created by Bigfoot creatures to alert others of their kind that they are present in the area. They may also be a warning to man to stay firmly away, although of course the obscure nature of the formations effectively means that very few of us are likely to understand

such a warning, never mind act upon it. Whatever the purpose of the bigfoot teepees, it must be said that they are very often found in areas where bigfoot has been seen. Personally, I have found such creations on several occasions. One was in two thousand and five, when, along with fellow creature seeker Ken Gerhard, I traveled out to Lake Worth, Texas to investigate the legend of the goat Man, which

may well have been a white bigfoot. On a small island on the Lake Greer Island, Gearhart and I found just such a formation, along with the remains of a devoured fish and a large depression in the ground that gave the impression of something large and heavy. Having sat there for a period of time, I made a similar discovery in two thousand and eight when I traveled to Ray Roberts Lake, Texas with Lance Oliver of the Denton Area Paranormal Society or DAPs for short. In one particular

heavily wooded part of the lake. We found numerous such creations, all of which appeared to have been fashioned with a high degree of intelligence, strength, and dexterity. All of the above notwithstanding, it's important to keep a sensible head on one's shoulders and realize that at least some bigfoot tepees are the work of Mother Nature. Jonathan Downs of the Center for forty in Zoology made a good point to me on this very issue in twenty twelve. I've always

found the whole bigfoot tepee thing dodgy as hell. I'll give you an example. Just recently we bought a chainsaw, as there are places in the garden the trees that haven't been pruned in years, and there are bits and places where the branches have grown together in what look like quite a complicated way. This is in my little garden in Woolsy, England. You've got trees and branches doing odd things. And it is things like this that mean

I've never been impressed by the bigfoot tepees. I think they are purely natural phenomena and nothing to do with bigfoot in Britain or anywhere. Indeed, it would be wise to keep an open mind, but always err on the side of caution when it comes to the controversy of the bigfoot tree structure phenomenon. On numerous occasions, bigfoot seekers have reported finding curious creations in areas where Bigfoot has

been seen. Essentially, they are tepee like structures that appear to have been created by something with intelligence and a great deal of strength too. The latter is made abundantly evident by the fact that, in many cases, the branches of the trees used to create these sometimes huge structures appear to have been wrenched off. In other cases, the branches appear to have been carefully bent over and intertwined. As for why Bigfoot might engage in such curious behavior,

the theories are several. At first glance, one might assume they have been constructed to offer the beasts a degree of shelter, and particularly so during the cold winter months. In many cases, however, there does not appear to have been any attempt made to create a canopy or walls. Words, the structures are open to the environment and all of

its attendant harshness. Other theories are more intriguing. It has been speculated that perhaps the teepees represent territorial markers created by bigfoot creatures to alert others of their kind that they are present in the area. They may also be a warning to man to stay firmly away, although of course the obscure nature of the formations effectively means that very few or of us are likely to understand such

a warning, never mind act upon it. Whatever the purpose of the bigfoot teepees, it must be said that they are very often found in areas where bigfoot has been seen. Personally, I have found such creations on several occasions. One was in two thousand and five, when, along with fellow creature seeker Ken Gerhard, I traveled out to Lake Worth, Texas to investigate the legend of the goat Man, which may

well have been a white bigfoot. On a small island on the Lake Greer Eye Island, Ken and I found just such a formation, along with the remains of a devoured fish and a large depression in the ground that gave the impression of something large and heavy. Having sat there for a period of time, I made a similar discovery in two thousand and eight when I traveled to Ray Roberts Lake, Texas with Lance Oliver of the Denton

Area Paranormal Society DAPs. In one particular heavily wooded part of the lake, we found numerous such creations, all of which appeared to have been fashioned with a high degree of intelligence, strength, and dexterity. All of the above notwithstanding, it's important to keep a sensible head on one's shoulders and realized that at least some Bigfoot teepees are the work of nature. Jonathan Downs of the Center for fourteen Zoology made a good point to me on this very

issue in twenty twelve. I've always found the whole bigfoot tepee thing dodgy as hell. I'll give you an example. Just recently we bought a chainsaw, as there are places in the garden the true trees that haven't been pruned in years, and there are bits and places where the branches have grown together in what look like quite a complicated way. This is in my little garden in Woolsey, England.

You've got trees and branches doing odd things. And it is things like this that mean I've never been impressed by the bigfoot tepes. I think they are purely natural phenomena and nothing to do with Bigfoot. In Britain or anywhere. What whatever the truth of the matter, it would be wise to keep an open mind, but always air on the side of caution when it comes to the controversy

of the Bigfoot tree structure phenomenon. Bigfoot as an inter dimensional interloper, There's probably no cryptid out there that is as sighted, talked about and as well known as Bigfoot. It is the rock star of cryptids, the one that even people with no interest at all in cryptozoology have

heard of, perhaps only second to the Lockness Monster. Ask most people what they think these creatures are, and you will more likely than not get the answer that they are some sort of massive, undiscovered ape like animal that lurks in remote areas of the world. Yet, what if Bigfoot is, at least in some cases, no animal at all, or at least not like any known by us. What if these creatures are something from not only beyond our understanding,

but from beyond our very reality. The traditional assumption concerning hary hominids such as Bigfoot is, of course, that they are biological entities, flesh and blood creatures of a species that has simply not been discovered and properly described by science. Yet In this paradigm, these are living, breathing animals hiding out in the remote wilds of our planet, skulking about in the shadows and skirting about just beyond our ability

to find them, constantly evading and confounding us. In many ways, this seems to make sense. After all, there are many examples of such robust ape like creatures and early versions of Homo sapiens in the fossil record of some areas of the world that could provide a link to an

explanation for what has been seen. There are also many fairly large animals throughout history that have managed to remain hidden and which long inhabited the same realm as cryptids before their eventual discoveries, such as those I have covered here before. On the surface, it all seems at least possible that relic populations of hairy bipeds could be out there, tucked away in the remote wildernesses of our planet, away

from our prying eyes and rampant exploration. Yet in recent years, the age old entrenched idea that Bigfoot and other creatures like it could only be biological animals has experienced more and more criticism from both skeptics and a few cryptozoologists alike. The most commonly stated problem is a lack of any fossil evidence in many of the areas where some of these entities have been seen, such as North America, Australia,

and bizarrely England. This is actually not a major setback in and of itself, as fossils tend to be very rare in the first place, with a rather incomplete record, and we are constantly finding whole new prehistoric species through newly found fossils. The problem is that there has been no reliable fossil evidence of anything even remotely like Bigfoot in many of the places where they are routinely seen.

These creatures would not exist in a vacuum. There should be at least transitional species or something like a primate that could be somewhat connected to Bigfoot, yet there is nothing. In this sense, The problem is not necessarily that there are no fossils of Bigfoot, but rather that there is a complete void of anything in the record of North America and some other locations that could even be tentatively

associated with something like it. With the rather sketchy nature of fossils to begin with, it is not necessarily the nail in the coffin for a flesh and blood bigfoot, but it is a rather glaring anomaly to contend with. Another thing that seems to be a strike against the notion of a biological Bigfoot is simply that these creatures have been seen absolutely everywhere and by scores of people

from all walks of life in increasingly urbanized areas. Look through sightings reports archives from organizations such as the Bigfoot Field Research Organization or BFRO for short, and you will find that there are hundreds and hundreds of sightings of these creatures from all over. At times, it seems as if Bigfoot is spotted even more than some actual known animals such as moose, cougars, bears, wolverines, and so on.

Taking the sheer number of sightings reports into account, it is increasingly difficult to hold on to the notion that these are elusive and rarely seen creatures relegated to isolated, remote places where they can hide from mankind. For if they are hiding, they are doing a very bad job at it, as they are spotted all of the time. If even half of these reports are genuine, then this is actually a rather well witnessed large animal not some

barely glimpsed specter. Bigfoot is apparently widespread as well. As then you have the fact that these reports come in from pretty much everywhere, including places where they have no right to be at all. Every single state of the Union has bigfoot reports, yes, including Hawaii. Bigfoot like creatures have also been spotted in other unlikely places as well, including as I mentioned, England and Australia, neither of which have anything whatsoever in their natural history at all to

suggest an animal such as this should be there. Yet

there they are. Why should this be? If you put together the vast number of sightings and the widespread nature of these reports, if any of it is to be remotely believed, then it is not difficult to get the impression that bigfoot cannot really be classified as a super rare beast that lives in only the most remote, uninhabited locales, And it subsequently gets more and more difficult to defend how they could have possibly gone without being discovered in

any sense, especially in this modern age. Indeed, there has not ever been any definitive physical evidence of these creatures despite all of these sightings. Sure there are footprints and other signs of their activity such as rock piles, shelters, and so on. But as for blood, reliable hairs, a carcass, or even a fragment of a bone, there is none. Remember that these are creatures seen all throughout the United

States and other places, often near highways and roads. Yet there has never been a single trace of a body. It does seem rather odd that this should be the case with such a widely seen beast. Of course, if one is to ask a hardcore skeptic why any of this should be, you will get a rather simple reply that Bigfoot simply does not exist and never has. Here's another notion, that it is all a nation spanning urban legend that sprawls across cultures, and that it is all

a tapestry of misidentifications, misinformation, hoaxes, and downright lies. Ask a skeptic and they will say that the reason there is no solid physical evidence or fossils is that Bigfoot

has never existed in any form in the first place. However, here we run into problems as well to outright dismiss or deny every single piece of evidence we do have out of hand, no matter how circumstantial, as well as the testimony of hundreds if not thousands of people, is to suggest that this is one of the most complicated,

elaborate hoaxes ever pulled off by humankind. While there are surely those who have fabricated sighting accounts or pulled hoaxes, can we say that every single person who has ever reported a Bigfoot is mistaken a prankster or worse yet, a liar. Are there so many people, often experienced or reliable witnesses known for their honesty, who would make up

this stuff on such a large scale. What's more, are so many people out roaming around in the forest, faking tracks and other signs of bigfoot, often with rather compelling results, or cavorting about in guerrilla costumes. Stay tuned for more sasquatch ott to see. We'll be right back after these messages. In some ways, to suggest this is all some giant delusion in hoax is almost harder to accept than that there is a giant ape like hominid wandering the wilds.

So if Bigfoot is seen by so many yet leaves behind so little strong evidence and still has remained undiscovered, and if these people are not all liars and delusional, then perhaps the explanation for Bigfoot lies somewhere else altogether,

and this is where things get really weird. One admittedly controversial and outlandish idea that has nevertheless gained more and more momentum and traction in recent years is that, rather than a flesh and blood animal that has simply remained undiscovered, we are perhaps dealing with an entity from some other

reality or dimension. That instead of earth bound biological creatures, we are encountering interdimensional interlopers that shuffle back and forth across whatever membrane that separates our realms, either by accident or design. This idea, in general, is not new to

the world of the paranormal. Indeed, researcher and author John Keel, most famous for his book The Mothmann Prophecies, was well known for his speculation that some unexplained phenomena could possibly originate with what he termed ultraterrestrials or beings from a parallel dimension. Kill reason that their tentative nature in this reality and ability to shift between domains would help to explain some phenomena in which mysterious entities were widely seen,

yet frustratingly unable to be concretely proven or cataloged. This could be applied to ghosts, aliens, demons, or even Bigfoot. An eminent UFO author and researcher Jacques Valat often cited these ultraterrestrials as being perhaps behind the UFO phenomenon rather than Nuts and Bolt's space ships from some distant planet.

The idea that Bigfoot could be interdimensional in origin would also go a long way towards explaining a variety of other anomalies that have proven to be inconvenient to the notion that we are dealing with a flesh and blood creature. The list of such strangeness connected to the Bigfoot phenomenon is long. Reports of Bigfoot tracks that lead to nowhere, disappear in mid stride, or end at sheer walls of rock that such a creature could not possibly hope to

climb are not uncommon. Many Bigfoot sightings possess a definite feel of the paaranormal, such as accounts of the creatures vanishing into thin air or disappearing into flashes of light or shape changing, as well as invisible vanishing or telepathic Bigfoot.

Then there are mysterious orbs of light or sudden, inexplicable bright flashes that accompany many reports, details which are often downplayed or even omitted, as well as the numerous technical malfunctions that seem to plague those who would record the creatures, as well as their ability to generally avoid camera traps

and other such electronic gear. On top of all of this, there are the numerous permutations of the creatures spotted all over the United States and elsewhere, such as dogmen, goatman, sheep, squatch, batsquatch, were wolves, and lizard men, which open up a whole world of high strangeness that becomes more and more difficult to reconcile with any sort of flesh and blood animals.

This world of ours possesses. The idea that Bigfoot is an inner dimensional entity may sound at first to be absurd, but considering all of the boxes this potential explanation ticks, is it really Is it really so far fetched if

one is to accept that Bigfoot is real in any form? Indeed, such ideas are being pursued more and more to explain a wide variety of what has traditionally been seen as paranormal phenomena, and even in mainstream science, our understanding of physics in the universe has increased opened up the possibility that other universes exist beside our own, even bleeding over into ours. Such an interdimensional link as being seen more and more plausible as both a scientific theory and as

a possible thread that runs through it all. One paranormal researcher named William Hall has said of this, it used to be that the UFO people didn't talk to the ghost people because they were a little weird, and nobody would talk to the Bigfoot people because they were crazy. I found out we cannot continue to do that. In reality, quantum physics is leading us there. It is meaningless to postulate at this point as to how or why these entities might do this. We wouldn't even know where to

begin at this point. However, considering that this theoretical interdimensional travel by these beings could possibly be explained by science as we know it, none of this would even be technically paranormal at all, but rather an effect of natural phenomena that we simply don't understand yet. In this sense, such interdimensional interlopers would not be supernatural in any sense, just utilizing features of laws of the universe that simply

lie beyond our understanding at this point. Paranormal researcher Rob Riggs gave his spin on this on the podcast After Dark. We always want to jump right in and say that's extra dimensional or paranormal, but you know, I think we may simply be talking about creatures that have access to physical spaces that humans cannot perceive. That they in fact are three dimensional physical creatures, but they are able to go into spaces that lie outside our perception because they

are outside our reality tunnel. That somehow these creatures enter into spaces that we have not mentally tuned into. Nevertheless, the interdimensional Bigfoot theory is at this point still very controversial amongst cryptozoologists, many of whom cling to the flesh and blood explanation tooth and nail, and consider any other explanation woo woo and an affront to their field. To even mention such an idea on some Bigfoot forms or at Bigfoot conventions will get you the cold shoulder at

best and laughed out of the room at worst. And it is actually rather shocking at times how closed minded some in the field can be with any theory that doesn't quite see eye to eye with what they think.

In many respects, these cryptozoologists are every bit as dismissive of the interdimensional theory as skeptics are of the idea of Bigfoot to begin with, which could actually be hindering finding out any answers either way, as it forces us into closed minded, preconceived avenues of inquiry and creates divides between different camps who are all at least ostensibly searching for the truth. One cryptozoologist named James R. Harknock has

explained of this attitude toward interdimensional explanations within cryptozoology. While many cryptozoologists and cryptozoology supporters find such theories ridiculous and often laugh them off, we would all do well to remember that the so called mainstream of science has much the same reaction when presented with the possibility of sasquatch

existing at all. If we hope for mainstream scientists to keep an open mind, we must lead by example and not waste time and energy that would be better spent searching for evidence fighting amongst ourselves. Of course, not all cryptozoologists are so resistant to the idea, and there has even been the idea that flesh and blood cryptids such as Bigfoot can coexist with theories of more inter dimensional

entities that they are not mutually exclusive. For instance, there could very well be real biological hairy hominids in some areas of the world, and perhaps even a flesh and blood bigfoot in some areas, but that these creatures are also joined in their habitat by other, more mysterious entities from another reality. There is not necessarily a need to favor one over the other, and famed cryptozoologist Lauren Coleman

has said of this. So as not to come off as a hip, I must point out that I have investigated and written about winged humanoids, dog man, werewolves, goat man, lizard man, mermaids, and a myriad of other non human entities. If they exist, these apparitions are most certainly paranormal in nature, interdimensional, extraterrestrial, demonic choose your own wording. The difference with bigfoot sasquatch is that it is clearly represented in our fossil history

in the form of robust hominids from the Pleistocene. That makes its existence very viable in the natural world. I respect everyone's right to their opinion and don't make a habit of questioning anyone's personal experiences. If you believe you have seen a Bigfoot materialize or vanish. It may very well be that there is a supernatural phenomenon that chooses to take the form of a giant, hairy humanoid seemingly

related to Bigfoot, but only superficially similar. Maybe this is true, and that we are dealing with a spectrum of disparate phenomena that range from real flesh and blood animals to

other more paranormal or woo woo explanations. Perhaps the answers lie somewhere in between these different ideas, depending on the case, But it seems the full truth will possibly elude us if we are not willing to at least admit that there are certain holes in the theory of these creatures as solely undiscovered animals that have not been satisfactorily proven and hold firmly to the flesh and blood hypothesis in

every single case. I do not mean to particularly endorse the idea of an interdimensional Bigfoot here, nor to even say that a flesh and blood Bigfoot is impossible. Yet this does not cover the full range of the phenomenon at large. I only mean to suggest that, in light of the various anomalies and oddities that can be seen across the full spectrum of the Bigfoot phenomenon, which are often inconsistent with a normal animal as we know it.

Perhaps we need to at least consider other possibilities, no matter how outlandish or even absurd they may seem at first. Maybe we need to think outside of the box to seek fresh avenues to pursue in order to shine new light into the darkness of the unknown and illuminate beyond the edges of what we can now see in the considerable morass of all of the ideas and theories swirling about on Bigfoot. In the end, it can be basically

distilled into a few choices. We can either believe sightings, reports, and the evidence so far have merit and thus except that Bigfoot perhaps really exists, or we can dismiss it all as a grand, elaborate hoax. If we are to take the former, then we can choose to deal with it as strictly a biological animal, as we uncomfortably struggle with the growing improbability of it going undiscovered so long in every state of the Union and places where it

should not be without a shred of concrete evidence. In that case, we must also accept all sightings reports as being potentially real, including ones that have uncomfortable paranormal tones, which can be hard to reconcile with an animal as we know it, and so must wrestle with this conundrum. Or we can concede that at least some of it is something, perhaps weirder than we'd like to admit, whether

that is interdimensional phenomena or something else. Maybe we have to consider for a moment that the Bigfoot phenomenon might be stranger than we imagine, perhaps even stranger than we can imagine.