Now one of your pudding. I got a string going on here, something just cause my dog. Something killed your dog, my dog. We're flying through the or over the tree. I don't know how it did it, Okay, Damn, I'm really confused. All I saw is my dog coming over the fence and he was dead. And once you hit the ground like, I didn't see any cars. All I saw was my dog coming over the fence. Sat what are you putting? We got some wonder or something
crawling around out here? Did you see what it was? Or was it was? Standing enough? I'm out here looking through the window now and I don't see anything. I don't want to go outside. Jesus Chraice, you better, Hello, Ghet, somebody out here? What quen? I'm Outair's got of aventures about tech forty nine? I don't know easy amount, Yes, I'm right. Oh, hello and welcome to Sasquatch Odyssey. Brian has asked me to be your guide on this midweek bonus episode as we take a
trip across the pond to explore the Australian Yowi. We start with a quick story about Tim the Yowiman, who, although he has had his fair share of experiences in the bush, remained skeptical about the existence of these hairy, bipedal creatures. From there, we'll head off into the Blue Mountains and join the Blue Mountain Cryptid Research Group. There we will explore their findings and take a look at some theories on the Yowi as well as the North American Sasquatch.
Tim the Yowi man known for his fascination with the strange and unusual, led an ordinary life until a fateful camping trip near the Snowy Mountains. It was on this trip that he witnessed something in the bush that would set him on a lifelong journey into the paranor. Ever since he was a child, Tim had been intrigued by mysterious occurrences. However, it wasn't until nineteen ninety four, during his camping expedition near Canberra that his curiosity reached its peak.
One night, he came face to face with a creature he couldn't identify, sending shivers down his spine. When he shared his experience with others, they informed him that he had encountered the infamous Yowi. At the time, Tim had no knowledge that the Yowi was Australia's version of the legendary Bigfoot from America. Described as a hairy, ape like creature standing over two meters tall, the Yowi was deeply rooted in Aboriginal legends. This encounter ignited a five year
project for Tim. He dedicated himself to interviewing individuals who had encountered similar creatures, not only in Australia but also around the world. Despite his efforts, he failed to gather any concrete evidence or have further encounters with the Yowi. Nevertheless, this experience opened Tim's eyes to the abundance of mysterious stories, not only in Australia but also globally. Now forty four years old, Tim has
expanded his expertise from Yowie's to anything that goes bump in the night. He travels the world following leeds from fans of his books in search of ghostly and peculiar phenomena. When asked about his creepiest Australian experience, Tim recalled an incident off the coast of Western Australia. He had dived on the shipwreck Alkimos, which was rumored to bring bad luck to anyone who dared touch it. Initially skeptical of the curse, Tim's perspective changed when a freak wave washed him against
the wreck, resulting in a cut on his hand. From that moment on, he experienced three weeks of unimaginable misfortune, including being head butted by a camel, breaking car keys in a remote area, and his girlfriend unexpectedly leaving the country for three years. Coincidentally, during this period, the magazines that funded his adventures went bankrupt. In an attempt to reverse his luck, Tim returned to Perth, touched the wreck again and offered his apologies. Miraculously,
his fortune changed for the better. Another eerielocation that Tim considers one of the creepiest in Australia is Black Mountain near Cairns. Despite his extensive experiences, Tim remains a skeptic. He identifies himself as a gatherer of supernatural evidence, but maintains an open mind. After more than two decades of exploring the unexplained.
He strives to explain phenomena using science and available resources. However, he acknowledges that some occurrences may defy explanation and lie beyond the limits of human understanding. There is abundant and diverse evidence of cryptic common at activity known as yowie's in the Blue Mountains, located west of Sydney in New South Wales. This evidence includes physical signs like footprints and damage to trees and foliage, as well as
numerous eye witness sightings over an extended period of time. While local residents are often aware of the presence of these creatures, this knowledge rarely reaches the general public. However, a loose collectiveness known as the Blue Mountain's Cryptid Research, along with other individuals, are actively studying yowi's and their behaviour in the region,
using various approaches to provide a glimpse into the evidence. A few examples of encounters with these creatures will be presented, which should serve as a starting point for more detailed descriptions by other researchers. Different theories about the origins of yooi's will also be discussed. Some authors favor an evolutionary perspective, suggesting that yaowis are a species of normal animals that have evolved over millions of years and
are indigenous to Australia. On the other hand, some investigators and eyewitnesses highlight peculiarities and strangeness associated with yowi reports, proposing alternative explanations, including psychic phenomena. Yawi research within Australia is thriving and represented by numerous groups and individuals who
can be broadly categorized as amateur researchers and documenters. Unlike the situation in the United States, where there is often limited cooperation between different bigfoot research groups, there appears to be a greater sense of collaboration among Australian researchers, with only a few individuals deviating from this trend. Notably, the bounty hunter's style of investigators whose primary goal is to shoot a bigfoot is not present in the Australian
context. However, it is important to provide a disclaimer. The purpose of this presentation is not to convince skeptics or the general public of the existence of yooi's, as we believe that there is already ample evidence available. However, we understand that those with little knowledge of the field may find this approach unusual. Nonetheless, the case histories presented in this episode will provide casual observers with
the wealth of circumstantial evidence. We will share accounts from two residents of the Blue Mountains, which represent only a fraction of the existing evidence. During my early youth, I heard about yowis from my uncle who used to live in the Hunter Valley and had encountered them on the banks of the Hunter River. My own potentially counter with a yowie took place north of Sydney. On our
way back from a trip to the North Coast. My mother and I decided to take a back road to Sydney in order to avoid the usual traffic congestion near Wyon. This road leads from Central Mangrove to Calgar and eventually to Mount White. This bush area connects to the Wattagans in the north, kuring Guy in the south, and Yengo National Park in the west, eventually leading to the vast Wallamy Wilderness. The road we were traveling on was long and straight,
heading south from Central Mangrove. Despite it being nighttime, the straight road allowed us to see quite far ahead in the headlights. It was my brother who first noticed a large figure on the left hand side of the road some distance ahead and alerted us to it. We all then spotted a sizable shape standing at the edge of the bush. Due to the darkness we couldn't make out specific details of what it was. As our car approached and passed the
shape, it turned and quickly retreated into the bush. Intrigued, we turned to look out of the back wind window of the car, only to see the shape disappearing into the depths of the bush. We were all taken aback by the figure we encountered on the road that night. Its sheer size, standing at least six or seven feet tall and with a solid build, ruled out the possibility of it being a kangaroo. The curiosity got the better of us, and I urged my mother to turn the car around so we could
investigate further. However, she refused, citing a strange sense of unease that had come over her. She pressed harder on the accelerator, leaving the mysterious figure behind us. While I don't personally know of any other reports from that specific area, I wouldn't be surprised if others have had similar experiences. In fact, there have been reports of Yowie's in the vicinity of Woi Woi,
which is about ten kilometers south of where we encountered the figure. A few years later, during Easter of nineteen seventy nine, I found myself camping with a large group of people in the remote wilderness north of Yarrangobli, within the Kasiusco National Park. We had ventured far from civilization, taking a fire trail that led us thirty kilometers away from the nearest town. Our camp site was
a few kilometers south of Michelago Peak. After spending a few hours around the camp fire listening to the distant howls of dingoes as they approached the nearby creek, we settled down for the night. However, our peaceful slumber was abruptly interrupted in the early hours of the morning. A bone chilling howling, bellowing and screaming pierced through the night. My friend and I jolted awake, paralyzed with fear as the sound reverberated through the air. It seemed to originate from
a valley or two away, as it was incredibly loud yet distant. Over the course of the next ten minutes, the howling drew nearer, but just before it became too close for comfort, it abruptly ceased. Describing the sound as a challenge, but it can only be likened to a combination of bellowing, roaring and screaming. The most striking aspect was its deep and booming quality, reminiscent of sounds one would expect to hear in a dense jungle rather than
the eucalyptus forests of New South Wales. It felt completely out of place, wrong. Even to this day, I have never encountered anything else like it. These personal encounters serve as a mere glimpse into the wealth of evidence surrounding Yowi's in the Blue Mountains region. While some may question the validity of these accounts, we believe that they contribute to a broader understanding of these elusive creatures. It is important to approach this subject with an open mind and consider the
various perspectives and theories put forth by researchers and eyewitnesses alike. The Blue Mountain's Cryptid Research or BMCR is a collective of individuals who share a common interest in the Yawi phenomenon in the Blue Mountains. Many of these members initially connected through their interactions with Aaron Dean Harrison, and they have since formed a network to
collaborate and share their findings. While some members prefer to remain anonymous for personal reasons, There are also other researchers in the area, such as Paul Cropper, Tony Healey, Neil Frost, and Rex Gilroy, who conduct their own investors and occasionally communicate with the BMCR. The BMCR aims to create an open forum for investigators and local residents to exchange experiences and ideas, primarily through an
email group. By fostering communication, the collective hopes to facilitate a better understanding of these creatures and their behavior. In their research, the BMCR tends to use terms like bush ape or hairy man instead of yowie to avoid the sensationalism often associated with the latter term. They believe that sensationalism can attract the wrong
kind of attention and potentially harm these potentially endangered species. In fact, some members of the BMCR even argue that the best way to preserve these creatures is to keep their existence as secret. The primary goal of the BMCR is to study the behavior of the bush ape and gain a deeper understanding of it. They are also interested in exploring theories about the origins of these creatures and welcome
discussions on the subject. By taking a reserved and scientific approach, the BMCR aims to demystify the yaoi phenomenon and contribute to the broader knowledge of these cryptids. Our approach to the study of these fascinating creatures is centered around a deep
respect for their natural habitat, rather than invasive methods or disruptive intrusions. We firmly believe that the most effective approach is to immerse ourselves in their environment, spending ample time in a specific location with only a small group of individuals. This approach aligns with the practices of renowned primate investigators like Diane Fosse and Jane goodare aiming to establish a bond between researchers and a particular group of creatures while
gaining valuable insights into their behavior. Given the time constraints faced by most researchers, this process will be gradual and ongoing, with occasional pauses and bursts of progress. Currently, we are directing our attention towards an active area that is separate from the main regions near Jerry and Nell's place. This choice is driven by the need to respect the privacy of the residents and to avoid disrupting any
developing relationships between them and their respective yoois. In pursuing our study objectives, we consider ourselves as a blend of amateur documenters, scientists, and researchers. While capturing footage of these creatures and discovering a type specimen such as a deceased body would be highly valuable, our primary focus at this moment is on studying and documenting their existence. What exactly is a yowi? Well, that's a
question that doesn't have a clear answer. The lack of physical evidence makes it difficult to come to a definitive conclusion. All we have to go on our eyewitness reports and the signs left behind by these mysterious creatures. From a scientific standpoint, these shreds of evidence provide valuable information for speculation. There are various
theories about what a yowi could be. Some believe they are descendants of giant Asian apes, while others lean towards a more mystical explanation, suggesting that these creatures possess paranormal attributes. However, we can't delve into this aspect further due to the lack of personal experiences supporting it. The authors of this presentation believe that yaoi's are most likely descendants of ancient hominids that migrated southward through Asia.
Somehow they managed to cross the formidable geographical barriers known as the Wallace Line, which has prevented other Asian megafauna from reaching Australia with the exception of Homo sapiens. We will explore this idea in more detail later on. Now, let's consider some more mundane explanations for the Yaui phenomenon. In this talk, we
will approach it from an evolutionary perspective. While it may not be as exciting as the paranormal approach, we currently find this theory to be the most plausible. However, we still acknowledge that the existence of a large bipedal primate in Australia without widespread detection is intriguing in itself. There are certain aspects of sightings that suggest there may be more to yaoi's than just flesh and blood. Perhaps there are still unknown factors at play, As is the case with many natural
phenomena, we remain open to new ideas. However, it is important to note that attributing paranormal qualities to explain unexplainable aspects of Yowi experiences is akin to using one unexplained phenomenon to explain another. As Poor Cropper has eloquently put it, a limited experience in an environment inhabited by yowis prevents us from fully understanding
their existence and ancestry, leading us to propose a mundane theory. The majority of reliable reports regarding Yooi's depict them as resembling upright gorillas, occasionally resembling orangutans. However, there are few distinguishing features that differentiate them from gorillas and give them a more humanlike appearance. They are sometimes described as ape like men,
but their apelike characteristics outweigh their human like ones. These characteristics include their immense size, hairy bodies, long arms, and notably the absence of a discernible neck. Additionally, subtle features like prominent canines suggest a closer relation to the great apes rather than humans. In light of this evidence, it is clear
that yaois belong to the primate family tree. Behavioral evidence further supports the notion that yaois are more closely aligned with the great apes, although certainty in this field is elusive. Their behavior includes bellowing, stomping their feet, occasionally running on all fours and exhibiting a semi nomadic lifestyle by constructing new nests each day. This addresses the commonly asked question of why we haven't discovered their dwellings.
These behaviors closely resemble those of guerrillas and orangutans. Moreover, the absence of evidence regarding permanent shelters and complex tool usage provides insight into their place within the primate family. It suggests that they diverge from the family tree later than the great apes, possibly sharing a closer relationship with humans. In conclusion, while our understanding of Yaoi's is limited, the available evidence strongly indicates their affiliation with
the primate family, particularly the great apes. However, the possibility remains that they may have done verged from this lineage at a later stage, potentially sharing a closer connection with humans. Let's begin by summarizing the different types of upright by pedal apes and humans known as hominids that have existed in the past. It is reasonable to assume that all of these beings had some form of language, even if it was less advanced than our own. Considering that even tribes
of wild chimpanzees have simple sign language, dialects grassile ostrolopithecenes. This term encompasses various small and lightly built upright by pedal primates, some of which may be ancestors of humans or a separate side branch of hominids. They lived in East and Southern Africa and likely originated earlier than four point two million years ago. The final types of grassile ostrolopithscenes lived until around two and a half million years
ago or possibly later. At Letally Tanzania, footprints believed to belong to a three point seven million year old grassile ostrolopithscenes have been discovered. These footprints are the oldest known evidence of a human like structure displaying an arch. Robust Ostrolopithus scenes also known as paranthropus. This category includes various groups that are similar to
the grascile ostrolopith scenes but appear to be a separate side branch. They lived between approximately two point six and one million years ago and exhibit stronger builds. Some robust ostrolopith scenes have larger skull crests and massive jaws. One particular type known as ostrolopith scenes boise a zingnthropists boise zinge or nutcracker man, due to its enormous jaw, dates back to around one point seven million years ago in
East Africa. Estimates of Zinga's maximum height vary between five and six feet, depending on whether one theorizes that their long arms made them tall or simply that they had disproportionately long arms compared to the rest of their bodies. As is often the case with remains from creatures of this age, skull and jaw remains are more commonly preserved than other body parts. Gigantopithecus, a massive primate, roamed the lands of southern China, Vietnam, and northern India between six million
years ago and five hundred thousand years ago. Unfortunately, only teeth and jaws have been discovered, leaving the debate open on whether it walked on two or four limbs. While most experts believe it was a quadrupedal relative of the orangutan, a few scientists argue for its possible bipedal nature, making it relevant to this discussion. Doctor Groverkrantz in particular, presents a compelling case for including Gigantopithecus
in the hominid family tree. These primates had large teeth, specially adapted for herbivary, with canines that often showed signs of being worn down due to their diet. Moving on to Meganthropis, this creature inhabited Indonesia approximately one million years ago. Similar to Gigantopithecus, there is a scarcity of remains. Although it is generally believed to be a robust form of homoerectus, it is still too
early to make a definitive conclusion. Some scientists have noticed similarities between meganthropis jaw remains and those of the robust Ostrolopitheccenes, raising the intriguing possibility of an Asian branch of Ostrolopithocene like hominids. Stay tuned for more Sasquatchodasy will be right back after these messages. Now, let's delve into Homo rutal fences and Homo habilis, two species that existed between two point four million and one point six million
years ago. Whether they should be classified as humans or ostrolopithoscenes is currently a subject of debate. These early hominids were the pioneers of advanced tool usage. Rutal Fensis remains were taller and sturdier compared to Habilis. They inhabited East Africa and are often considered potential ancestors of Homoerectus and Homo ergaster. However, their
direct lineage to modern humans remains a contentious topic among experts. Homoerectus and Homo Ergaster were ancient human species that existed from approximately one point eight million years ago to less than five hundred thousand years ago. Their skeletal structure closely resembled that of modern humans, but with a more robust build. Their skulls had prominent brow ridges and were more robust compared to modern humans. The extent of their
hairiness remains unknown. These early humans were skilled tool users and were likely the first hominids to venture beyond Africa. Homoerectus in particular, inhabited the Earth for a longer period than any other human species and spread across Eurasia. The distinction between the last Homo erectus individuals and early forms of Homo sapiens is somewhat blurry, spanning from five hundred thousand to one hundred fifty thousand years ago. This
suggests a gradual transition between these two groups. Many consider homoergastera a human similar to homoerectus to be the direct ancestor of homohydelpagensis, Homo neandertalensis, and Homo sapiens according to the out of Africa theory. However, others believe that both both erectus and Ergaster were ancestors of Homo sapiens the multi regional theory. This
topic remains a subject of debate. It is important to note that despite the terms out of Africa and multi regional, both theories agree that humans originated in Africa. They only differ in their interpretations of the development of Homo sapiens. The possibility of interbreeding between distinct but similar groups across Eurasia and Africa complicates the
identification of a direct ancestor for Homo sapiens during this period. Some proponents of the multi regional theory even argue that homoerectus and Homo ergaster should be classified as the same species as modern humans and referred to as Homo sapiens. Archaic Homo sapiens and homohydalbagensis are terms used to describe a diverse range of humans who lived approximately four hundred thousand to one hundred thousand years ago. Possibly even as late
as ten thousand years ago in Australia. They had slightly more robust skull structures and would have appeared indistinctinguishable from modern humans if dressed and groomed accordingly. The extent of their hairiness remains unknown. These early humans seem to have roamed extensively. Some believe that the most recent remains of such individuals are found in q
Swamp, Victoria, Australia, dating back approximately ten thousand years. They may have been the first human group to inhabit the continent before being assimilated by later tribes migrating from the north. Homo sapiens neander talensis or Homo neander talensis, commonly known as neander talls, were a group of humans who lived between one
hundred fifty thousand and thirty five thousand years ago. They had a stronger skeletal structure compared to modern Europeans and were adapted to the environment of glaciated Europe. While it is uncertain how hairy they were, their physical appearance would likely resemble that of a muscular person today. Neander Talls were skilled tool users and practiced burial rituals. They either when extinct due to conflict with other Homo sapiens or
interbred with them. Recent evidence suggests that Neanderthals were a separate species from Homo sapiens, making into breeding unlikely but not impossible. The understanding of various remains is constantly evolving as new evidence is discovered. It is believed that a group of robust hominids known as Paranthropus or robust Ostrolopithyscenes diverge from the human family tree
before two point six million years ago. Remains like meganthropists, may represent unknown robust hominids that settled in Asia earlier than one million years ago, potentially unrelated to the robust ostralopithyscenes. Ostralopithecus boise a demonstrates that apes or hairy people can develop a bipedal skeleton, skull crests, and a height comparable to modern humans.
Inconsistencies in the reported appearance of hairy bipedal primates are worth noting. Sasquatch and the Yowie reports sometimes mention large noses, with some resembling guerrilla noses. No size is determined by cartilage and bone struck, which can vary significantly on human faces. Chimpanzees and gorillas have less variation in no shape. The natural
variation in those types among early upright by Peedal primates is unknown. The differing reports of hairy man creatures having human like or gorilla like faces may be attributed to this variation. In those types. A creature with a large, prominent nose would appear more human like, while one with a small, flat nose would resemble a gorilla more closely, reports of the Australian hairy man and the skunk apes in North America have spark discussions about their unique features, particularly their
large canine teeth. Interestingly, evidence of tree bites found in bloodward trees in Australia seems to support these claims, showing distinct marks from sizeable upper and lower canines. This observation raises questions about the evolutionary origins of these hairy creatures. One intriguing aspect is that none of the known by Peedal primate fossils exhibit prominent
canine teeth, whereas many non bipedal primates do. This suggests that these hairy men may have diverged from the primate family tree at an earlier point, making there bipedal stance, an example of convergence. Alternatively, they could be descendants of known by peedal primates, with their prominent canines being a result of evolutionary
convergence, similar to the skull crests seen in guerrillas and robust ostrolopithaccenes. Interestingly, not all sasquatches and other hairy men are reported to have large canines. This could be due to witnesses not observing their teeth, or a significant difference in canine size between males and females of the species. Another possibility is that vegetarian feeding habits in certain regions cause the canines to wear down over time.
It is also plausible that large canines are a regional variation among these creatures, although the development of such variation seems unlikely to occur rapidly. Contrary to popular belief, the footprints attributed to them, these creatures, which are not obvious hoaxes, do not resemble simply scaled up human footprints. Doctor Jeff Meldram of Idaho State University conducted studies on supposed sasquatch footprints and found notable differences in foot
structure compared to human feet. These footprints lack an arch and exhibit indications of greater foot flexibility than human feet. Some footprints even show fewer than five toes, particularly those found in the southeastern parts of North America and Australia. This could be a result of inbreeding or the toes not exerting enough pressure on the soil till even noticeable impression. However, it is important to note that none
of these reported creatures have undergone rigorous examination, preventing any conclusive conclusions. Nevertheless, these observations serve as intriguing points of interest in the ongoing exploration of these mysterious beings. How could these elusive creatures have managed to survive for such a prolonged period of time while remaining undetected despite their widespread presence. It is truly fascinating to consider that robust astrolopitho scenes coexisted with more human like beings in the
same region and era. What happened when the paths of these two types of bipeds intersected. There is evidence suggesting that the more human like beings occasionally hunted their less human like counterparts. If the extremely robust hominids indeed survived much longer than previously believed. They must have developed certain strategies to minimize their vulnerability to
humans. Some advantageous traits they may have acquired include being active during human sleeping hours, particularly in areas where humans are present, exercising great caution to avoid leaving tracts that could be followed by humans, remaining hidden whenever humans are nearby, being extremely careful not to reveal themselves, seeking to avoid conflicts with humans whenever possible, Attempting to drive away humans who come too close to areas inhabited
by vulnerable family members, such as juveniles, through actions like throwing rocks or sticks, growling, or bluff charging. Interestingly, all these characteristics have been associated with the reported sightings of hairy men across the globe. Some noteworthy observations
about eight behavior and social structure. Guerrillas and chimpanzees share certain behavioral and social structure traits, including living in groups ranging from two to approximately twenty individuals led by a dominant male who protects the group and their territory, Creating beds made of grass and sticks, using them only once before moving to a different location the next day, Utilizing a variety of vocalizations such as calls, grunts,
barks, hoots, and even sign language to communicate with one another and ward off threats to the group. Upon reaching adulthood, some males leave their original group and become solitary until they successfully attract mature females from other groups to form their own group, generally being gentle creatures, although males and nursing mothers have
been known to easily kill humans if they feel threatened. I witness accounts of bipedal apes and hairy men from around the world seem to exhibit behavior consistent with the aforementioned traits from which hominid are They most likely descended. The bipedal walking
displayed by these beings suggests that they belong to the hominid family. In the case of the sasquatch and other similar large and robust creatures that have been reported, we can estimate when they diverge from the human ancestral lineage based on their behavior and appearance. Here are some examples of their reported behavior which indicate their ability to anticipate outcomes and demonstrate high intelligence. One making an effort to avoid
leaving tracks that could be followed. Two leaving stick markers, three being highly skilled at hiding and blending into their surroundings, four leaving gifts for or reciprocating gestures from humans. These behaviors suggest that their brain size exceeds that of chimpanzees
at around four hundred cubic centimeters. As chimpanzees are not known for their exceptional ablas to anticipate outcomes, combined with their bipedal walking, it indicates that these large hominids branched off from the human ancestral lineage after the ancestors of modern chimpanzees did. Various methods have estimated the divergence of chimpanzees from the human lineage to be between six million and four and a half million years ago. The molecular
clock countback method suggests a date around five million years ago. It is unlikely that this divergence occurred later than five million years ago, as the first hominids appeared at least four point two million years ago. Additionally, during a period of global cooling between six million and five million years ago, Africa became drier and less forested. The disappearance of typical primate forest habitat seems to be one
of the most probable factors that led to the adoption of bipedalism. This supports the aforementioned estimates. However, the sasquatch and similar creatures differ greatly from humans because studies conducted by doctor Jeff Meldrum of ice Idaho State University indicate that sasquatch have a different foot structure, lacking an arch and possessing greater flexibility compared to humans. They are much more robust, They do not seem to have the
ability to create fire, They do not seem to make clothing. They do not seem to utilize advanced tools beyond sticks or stones. These characteristics suggest that they diverge from the human lineage earlier than the appearance of the first humans around two million years ago, and before the emergence of hominids with a human like foot structure, which had an arch and a nearly rigid metatassal joint at least three point seven million years ago. The absence of technology also indicates a creature
with a brain structure somewhat different from humans, although not necessarily smaller. Therefore, it is reasonable to propose that these creatures branched off from the human lineage between six million and four million years ago. The only known by pedal primate
before four million years ago is Ostrolopithecus anamances. Considering the the bust nature of creatures like the sasquatch, it is plausible to suggest that they may be descended from the robust form of ostralopith scene that diverge from other ostralopith scenes before four million years ago. The robust ostralopith scenes that appeared before two and a half million years ago may or may not be part of their ancestral lineage, as
the details of their foot structure are not entirely certain. These robust ostralopith scenes had brains up to thirty percent larger than chimpanzees, or around five hundred thirty cubic centimeters compared to four hundred cubic centimeters, indicating a high level of intelligence. If sasquatch type creatures are indeed descended from an ostralopith scene, it does not necessarily make them ostralopith scenes themselves. They may have developed enough unique traits
to warrant their own genus name. Until multiple specimens of such creatures are examined, it is not possible to assign them a genus or species name. For now, a suitable technical term for these creatures would be something like hyper robust hominids. These creatures may have evolved from ostrolopith scenes, but unfortunately, there are no well preserved fossils from this time period. However, doctor Groverkrantz believed
that Gigantopithecus, a possible ancestor, may have diverged during this era. He suggested that Gigantopithecus might have been bipedal based on the width of its jaw, which could have accommodated the neck if it stood upright. Furthermore, Gigantopithecus possesses teeth that exhibit intermediate characteristics between those of apes like chimpanzees and humans. This classification makes it a hominid and a potential ancestor of the robust hominids believed to
exist today. Some scientists have proposed the idea that ostralopith scenes or Ostrolopithus scene like hominids could have inhabited Southeast Asia. This hypothesis emerged when similarities were observed between the Javanese jaw remains known as meganthropists and those of known robust ostralopith scenes. In Layman's terms. It is except to refer to ostrolopith scenes as apes or people, but they are not considered humans. The technical term for them
is hominids. The modern hyper robust hominids seem to share body structure and technology with the robust australopith scenes, making both people and apes suitable Layman's terms. The question of how these creatures reached Australia, of all places is a challenging one to answer convincingly. One possible explanation involves the scenario where human populations exceeded the lands carrying capacity, leading members of the group to venture into new territories
and potentially displacing other human tribes. This migration occurred multiple times in Indonesia during the glacial periods of the past one hundred thousand years. During these periods, when the gap between Australia and nearby islands was at its narrowest, various human groups migrated to Australia. The Australian Aboriginals are descendants of a mixture of these
groups. It is plausible that a large population of robust prime was pushed towards the extremities of places like Java, due to the influx of migrating human tribes. In such circumstances, young males seeking new territory may have had no choice but to swim to nearby islands. Their calls during the night may have enticed young females to follow suit. Over a span of approximately twenty years, enough
animals could have made the swim to establish a sustainable breeding population. The gaps separating the Australian and New Guinean land masses from other islands were too wide for swimming across, and no known animal can produce a call that would carry across such distances, except possibly elephants. There is no historical precedent for such a
swim among any known large terrestrial mammal, again, except possibly elephants. However, Bob Titmus, the renowned sasquatch researcher, claimed to have found encouraging signs on small islands off the coast of British Columbia. He discovered footprints resembling sasquatch tracks, although these islands were too small to support a breeding population of such crete and were separated from the mainland by vast expanses of rough water. If
these creatures are deserving of research. One might wonder why more serious scientists are not studying them. In the words of Sir Peter Metawar, good scientists study the most important problems they think they can solve. It is, after all, their professional duty to solve problems, not merely to grapple with them.
Therefore, when researching this topic, we must keep this in mind. As John Napier once wrote regarding the explanation of these creatures through the survival of prehistoric species, it would be convenient to assign the ape like Gigantopithecus to the Himalayas and the more human like parenthropists to North America, but it would be unscientific
to do so. What is the future of yowi research in Australia? The realm of yowi research in Australia unveils intriguing variations and the approaches adopted by different researchers. In his renowned book Bigfoot's Sasquatch Evidence, Roverkrantz delineated various categories of enthusiasts. These encompass the amateurs who possess a part time fascination with a creature due to their encounters or knowledge the serious researchers and scientists, and the hunters
driven by the desire for a trophy. The Australian researchers predominantly align themselves with the former groups. Remarkably, a substantial level of collaboration exists among most Australian researchers, with only a few exceptions. The advent of the Internet has facilitated the gathering and communication of numerous inquisitive researchers. This cooperative spirit and overall openness are highly encouraging, fostering the potential for level headed research in the future.
It is also hopeful that a culture of sharing information among mutually respectful researchers can be fostered. The publication of multiple books on the subject by various individuals already exemplifies this trend. Nevertheless, a significant question looms large. Will we ever truly comprehend the nature of the AWI? Will it continue to elude us, appearing and vanishing at will, or will someone eventually unearthed concrete physical evidence that
unequivocally convinces skeptics. Ultimately, one must ponder does it truly matter? They say, you don't gotta go home, but you can't stay. No, I don't want to be. We're all oppen. Try this job that chart everything back. Joy for me, Joy, stay right from the ways, assist us, conser yes as side installs stars, stas, saside, stay state, still say games in best, Stay pass as passing, gainst things, past things,