This is uh John and Stephanie Connecticut. Great to have you with us. High Hey, Rush, it's Bethany Connecticut, not Stephanie Connecticut. What what is it? Bethany Bethany? Okay, Mr Mr Sturnley, mishurt you. I've never heard of Stephanie Connecticut either, but well it's probably I got a crappy stone. But my point is is, why isn't the simple answer for everyone who wants to talk about Russian interference in the election,
The simple answer should be ask Obama. He was the president, he was in charge, it was his powers that be that had the last day and everything. Why isn't it Why doesn't anyone ever want to blame him? And why isn't that the simple solution for every Conservatives? Well, you're you're getting ahead of something, and I intend to come up anyway here, So let me let me get started
on the on the transition. I want to go back, if you remember, not long ago, play the SoundBite from Michael Casey, former judge Mcasey, and he was Attorney General for a while under George but Bush. And he pointed out that the first lie of the mull of the first line of the Muller report is a line that the investigation began when George Stephanopolos got drunk at a bar and totally ambassador from Australia to Russians had dirt on Hillary Clinton. That's not when it began. Now, that
was the end of July two thousand sixteen. Long before that, Barack Obama had been talking about Russian intervention in the election and pooh pooing it. Well, you're you're exactly right. Obama had been talking about the fact that it would
be impossible to rig a United States presidential election. The reason that Obama was doing this was because the Democrats were hearing, uh getting getting messages rumbles from the Trump administration that the Trump administration Trump campaign was suggesting that the Russians were trying to help the Hillary camp pain and that the Russians might be involved in some things. And this is what caused Obama to go out and pooh pooh the idea he was he was basically trolling Trump.
But this is long before July two thousand and sixteen. But you are absolutely right that everybody involved in this coup or scandal has direct ties to both Obama and Hillary Clinton. Okay, our last caller from Stephanie, Connecticut. How could you how could you not hear about how could you think that a town was named Stephanie? You asked, you mean the caller confirmed and it was Stephanie. All right. Caller threw snartily into the No, the caller threw me
under the I'm the one who said Stephanie, Connecticut. You didn't get thrown under the bus. I did. But see that's I take the hit. I'm on the front lines. I never complain or blame highly overpain overrated staffers. That's part of being the guy. You take the hits, you get the acclaim, you also take the blame. No problem that it doesn't happen much Stephanie Connecticut. I mean, it's what it's set up there. So I I could have just said Connecticut, none for and I thought about that
for a brief split second. His point was, all this talk of collusion, all that will no matter what you're talking about, it all happened while Obama was president, All of this investigation, this coup, when it all happened when Obama was president. And that's exactly right. And this has long been a question that all of us just how high up. Does this go now? You and I, let's be honest, we don't have any doubt that Obama is
in on this and aware of it. And some of you may in fact believe that Obama was behind it, the energy and the impetus behind it. Some of these people were doing things that if they were going rogue and a president doesn't know some of these things are going on and finds out about it, heads would roll. I mean, there are legacies to be concerned with, there's the Constitution to be concerned with. But not only were
they not stopped, they are still being encouraged. Every one of these operatives, even the people have been fired, are still writing books. They're still out trying to shape the narrative on this. And by the way, just as an asside, they're more and more people now beginning to ask. And I'm glad because I think this is stunning and shocking the fact that not one media person, not one has sought to find the real story here, that everyone of them,
hundreds of them, became complicit. These are people that normally are standing guard vigilantly against government overreach, government reach into civil liberties violations. These are the people that facilitated civil liberties violations. They helped it. In fact, folks, in point of fact, if you want to get down to brass tax on this, this could not have happened without the media. If the c i A, If Brennan and Clapper and Come at all had not had the media, they could
not have pulled this off. And I don't just mean from the standpoint that, uh, the media didn't look into them. They actively needed the media as sympaticos. They needed the media as members of the army. They needed media as members of the operation. It's not just the media didn't try to expose what they were doing. It's that the media was the army. And if that weren't the case, this wouldn't have gotten nearly as far as it did. I think it's safe to say that this coup could
not have happened without the media. And now people are starting to realize this, and they're starting to take note of just what really happened here, that there was not one attempt by anyone in the legacy the mainstream media that attempted to get any of this right. More and more people are referencing this in the tweets and story and I am happy to see it. Now. I ran across the piece that was sent to me by a good friend over the weekend from the Federalist, and it's
written by h A. Goodman. That's a long piece. Will link to it at Russia limba dot com. That the headline is this John Durham, which is BARS investigator? Who is Bars investigator? John Durham needs to investigate why the information generating the Muller probe is all linked to Hillary Clinton. At a certain point, it cannot be mere coincidence that every major figure involved in probing Trump's campaign is linked to Hillary Clinton in some manner. Now, his point was Obama,
but I think Obama and Hillary are inseparable. Here. The FBI had a budget approaching ten billion dollars during Comey's tenure as its director. Combined with the budgets for the c i A and the n s A, these agencies cost taxpayers around thirty billion dollars annually. Now that may seem cheap, it may seem less than you would think. The c i A Black ops budget alone, nobody knows what it is. CIA owns airlines, the c i A
owns all kinds of things. Ten billion dollar budget for the CIA, but it will go with the number thirty billion combined FBI, c i A, n s A. Therefore, one would think that incriminating evidence derived from the FBI, n s A or c i A could have linked Trump to Russian hackers or crimin operatives. If that evidence existed for thirty billion dollars, you could find it. Thirty billion dollars in the best of the brightest, with that,
you could find it. Instead, almost all the major findings used to justify investigations into Trump's campaign or linked to Hillary not the CIA's work, not the n s a's work, not the FBI's were pretty much every major finding led by the dossier. Pretty much every leak that the New York Times and CNN in Washington Post ran came from
somebody associated with Hillary Clinton. The heads of America's top intelligence agencies used a dossier link to Clinton funding a tech firm outsourced by the d n C. This would be Fusion, GPS and CrowdStrike. They used hearsay from Alexander Downer, the Australian ambassador who is a donor to the Clinton
Foundation and an associate of same. The evidence leading up to the Mueller probe was so specious that the Department of Homeland Security, in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence reports that were compiled by Clapper and others had warrantied disclaimers. Pray and Trump was investigated based on intelligence linked to statements like quote, Department of Homeland Security does not provide any warranties of any kind regarding any
information contained within and quote. Judgments are not intended to imply that we have proof that shows something to be affect. That's why every story on this in paragraph thirteen reference the fact that none of this had yet been proven, but all of the evidence that came from intelligence agencies did come with disclaimers that I just read you. William Barr has hired prosecutor John Durham to investigate the origins
of the Mueller investigation. A key issue for Durham to resolve is why the inciting information never originated within the US government. Why has the funding for Democrats, along with other blatant conflicts of interest being ignored by Comey, Clapper, and Brennan. Although an estimated seventy percent of intelligence budgets go to private contractors, these private companies work with classified
material and their workers hold security clearances. Fusion GPS, the firm Clinton the Democrats hired to compile the Steel dossier did not provide the FBI classified intelligence. In fact, the Steel dossier still unverified and anyone can read it within
the BuzzFeed article that publicized at all CrowdStrike. The third party tech firm the d n C hired to analyze its servers instead of the FBI did not provide the FBI, the CIA, or n s A any classified intelligence from their investigation of the server, since the d n C is a private entity that never allowed U s intell agencies near its servers. The words nothing that came from official work of the CIA or the FBI or the n s A actually ended up in this investigation. It
all came from people or firms associated with Hillary Clinton. Comey, for example, never used intelligence derived from US sources to initiate or justify investigations into Trump's campaign. All the information that Comy, Clapper, and Brennan used to justify investigating Trump was data linked to Clinton or Democrats in some manner. During a Fox News interview with Bill Hemmer, William Barr explained that initiating a counter intelligence probe from the Steele
dossier was very unusual. Can you tell us about the Steele dussie what role did it play? Bar? Well, that's that's one of the questions. We're gonna have to look at. Very unusual situation. To have opposition research like that, especially one that's on its face, had a number of clear mistakes and somewhat June analysis, and to use that to conduct counter intelligence against an American political campaign would be strange development. I'm not sure what role it played, but
that's something we're gonna have to look at. Emmer, do you smell a rat in this? Bar? I don't know if I describe it as a rat. I just say the answers I'm getting are not sufficient. Durham will no doubt investigate the intent behind these decisions and the true reasons America's intelligence agencies outsourced virtually all of the evidence against that. That's the key Clapper brand. They were outsourcing everything to the Brits. They're outsourcing everything to to steal
to Fusion GPS. Everybody they outsourced it to was linked to Hillary Clinton, folks. Everything, every aspect of this, None of it came from legitimate FBI or CIA investigations. In other words, even struck Strokes, Mark, and Page were clued into the things they did by tip offs and guidance from the Clinton campaigner people therein At a certain point, it can't be mere coincidence that every major figure involved in probing Trump's campaign is linked to Hillary Clinton in
some manner. Christopher Steele, desperate to prevent Trump from being president, was paid a hundred and sixty grand by Democrats before he compiled as dossier. Democrat National Committee lawyers met with FBI officials before a surveillance warrant was granted, raising questions as to why the FBI would meet with a political parties lawyers yet not informed Trump that his campaign was
under investigation. Fusion GPS, the firm that hired Steele, was paid by money from Hillary Clinton and the d n C, and funneled through a law firm to compile the Steele dossier, not the FBI, not the CIA, not the n S A. Clinton allies gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to the political campaign of Andrew McCabe wife. Yet the former FBI Deputy director only recused himself from Clinton's email probe one
week before the election CrowdStrike. The only entity to analyze the claimed d n C email hack was outsourced and paid by the Democratic National Committee. Australian diplomat Downer informed the FBI of a conversation with George Papadopoulos. Or down stated that Trump campaign official was given information by a Russian operative about the d n C emails. Downer is not even mentioned in the Muller report, was never interviewed during the Muller probe, and is linked to the Clinton Foundation.
And yet the opening line of the report says that it all began with Papadopoulos telling down her about the point goes on in this piece, and it's very good, and it's one of these pieces. Nothing in this is new. I mean, I'm going through the rush. We knew that would have heard that. The point is Mr Goodman's come along, and later blatantly stated that everybody involved here running this coup was somehow tied to the Clinton campaign, not officially, FBI, not officially. C I A not a fit and these
people didn't do any counter intel investigation there own. They were just working with each other, setting Trump up in January, telling him the Golden Shower story from the dossier that was to get it as news on CNN and then elsewhere. Back to the phones, Henderson, North Carolina, this is a lamar. Great to have you, Lamar. How are you doing, sir,
Hey Rose, good to talk to you. Hey. I think it's pretty clear if you delve into it a little bit, why Mueller doesn't want to testify, and that's because of a couple of questions he can't answer. Uh. He never expected an attorney general bar to be appointed, and so his kind of fallback plan if he couldn't find uh slam dunk case to challenge the O o LC guidance and and diet Trump anyways, was to float this language in his report, with the O l C guidance being
the excuse where he's got two parallel paths going. He did not accuse Trump of any wrongdoing. And then aside from that, he puts all of this O l C guidance language implying that that's the reason, but he never
actually explicitly says that's the reason. It's kind of like if I were to tell you, Rush, we just got to the beach, but you can't go in the water because of the bacteria, the sharks and the riptide and then somebody comes up later and ask you, Rush, why didn't you go in the water, and you say, because I can't swim. One had nothing to do with the other, right, So,
but he wants it to appear that way. And you can see this battle going on between bar and Mueller, back and forth, and Barn knows what he was up to the whole time. So he asked him that question explicitly in the March fifth meeting and had him admit in front of witnesses that the OLC guidance is not the reason that he did not indict Trump or try to or accuse him of any wrongdoing. And from there
on it's been a battle back and forth. So Mueller followed up with that whiney letter in March complaining about the characterization of Bars letter, and then, uh, you know, he had he had his press conference after that, and the d o J had to follow that up with another statement saying, hey, these two statements are let me let me jump in over for a second, because it's not quite this complicated. Let me once again put this through the complexity synthesizer. The Mueller team had nothing, ever,
they never had any evidence of collusion. They had to manufacture the illusion or illusion of UM obstruction and then reference it because what they were doing from the get go was preparing think of the Mueller team as the House UM impeachment lawyers. That's what they have done. They have tried to create a case for Democrat House managers
to use in impeaching Trump. Mueller doesn't want to testify because he doesn't doesn't want to have to answer questions the Republicans would ask about the things he ignored.