In regards to the looting in Ferguson, Missouri, or the looting in any circumstance like this, and the politics of it. You remember Occupy Wall Street. Occupy Wall Street was a contrived, made up, artificially created protest group to counter the Tea Party. The Tea Party came into existence, as far as anybody knows, in two thousand ten. The Tea parties average Americans fed up with with with fear and anger over what they
saw happening to their country. The Tea Party originally was animated by the rapidly accruing debt and the oncoming Obamacare. The Tea Party was made up of people who were afraid of their kids and grandkids future that the country was going to go into such debt and the federal spending was going to consume so much that their tax rates would be so high that they would never have a chance to have a better life than their parents had had, which has always been part of the American dream.
The Tea Party was just a group of citizens. There was never any leader, There was never any particular candidate. It was people that had never been formally involved in politics before showing up at town hall meetings, and because there was no leader, and because there was there was no Washington tie, the official Washington establishment became petrified and paranoid,
scared the death of the Tea Party. The left which is totally consumed with pr and image and buzz because they have to avoid the substance of what their beliefs are. They cannot dare be honest about what they really believe, so they rely on substance and image uh lies about
their beliefs and their philosophies. Occupy Wall Street was an artificially created made to look like another grassroots movement that had sprung up to defend Obama and Obamacare and the spending and our Occupy Wall Street was specifically created by wealthy Democrats behind the scenes make it look like it was genuine and spontaneous as an answer to the Tea Party. Now one of the animating features of Occupy Walston and it's still around, by the way, It's dormant, but it is.
There's still people in it, still living in a shanty towns and so forth. But it's a you know, Occupy Wall Streets where Elizabeth Warren came from. Essentially, Elizabeth Warren with the you didn't build that. You you don't own that. You didn't make that happen. You factory owner, you business owner, you didn't make that happen. Why if we had an all manity together to build the roads and put in your sewage system for you could have never become rich.
So you didn't do it yourself. You didn't do it on your own. You didn't build that in Obama picked it up. Well. That became the rallying cry of Occupy Wall Street. And if there was a seminal or a central foundational belief and Occupy Wall Street is that work is not how you got things. Because even that deck
was stacked. Occupy Wall Street was originally aimed at the one percent on Wall Street, rich bankers, investment bankers, investment people on Wall Street, all these various financial houses, and the Occupy Wall Street people uh basically attempted to convey that things, the stuff that you get in life, does not come from work. That that's a fool's errand. And people who buy into the notion that you have to work to get your stuff are are are victims of
a big con game. The one person ever worked, they have all the money and they share it only with themselves, and it's all a giant trick to get everybody toiling away for meager wedges to benefit the already rich. It was built on resentment of capitalism, anger at the unfairness of the distribution of resources and all of that crap. And therefore any act of civil disobedience was justified because they were fighting injustice and unfairness and unequal distribution of
resources in a rigged game. This was made to buttress Obama. And this is, I guess, I say where Elizabeth Warren sprang up. Because the you didn't build that, you didn't make that, it directly traceable to the same kind of convoluted, perverted thinking and occupy Wall Street. Well, I think, using the snurdly doctrine when it comes to explaining looters, I think looters have much the same kind of thought process
that stuff things, houses, cars, what have you. That the work is not going to give you those names because it's stacked deck. If you engage in work, you're just working for the man. You're working for the one percent. You're toiling away to make him richard. But you ain't getting any of it, you aren't seeing any of it.
And indeed, social justice pretty much teaches this exact thing, and therefore social justice tells people who don't have things that they are entitled to take whatever the hell they want when they can and when they want it, because they are entitled to it, because it's being purposely denied them. So when an opportunity springs up, such as the unfortunate shooting in St. Louis or when your sports team went whatever it is, you make a bee line because it's
all about justice. It's all about getting even, it's all about finally being able to grab some of what people are not letting you have. This is the beliefs that this is. And by the way, this is not just doccument in Wall Street. This is pretty much the left in general and the reason for their anti capitalist stance. It's rigged, it's unfair, and all this labor i e. Their jobs doesn't get them. Anything, doesn't get them healthcare, it doesn't get them. A TV set doesn't get it.
Whatever he gets all that for the boss, the boss and the owner. That's the guy who gets rich and he's out playing golf every day or having three martini lunches or what. He's not working, and he didn't build his business on his own either, that's the latest scam to be revered. No, no, no, he didn't build that, the same duped labor rus who toil away for embarrassingly low Widge made the business owners business. They built it,
they made it possible. And then yeah, and some of these occupy people actually believe, what do you mean going to college? I go to college, I go into debt and my first job isn't McDonald's. What a rigged game? You mean? I'm not gonna get Adie Grand out of college? I mean, I'm not gonna be living in Shaker Heights right out of college. I'm not gonna be living in Pacific Heights right out of college. I can't move to
the Upper east Side right out of college. I'm not gonna have a house in the Hampton's right out of college. Or what a rigged game? And so it's this entitlement to stuff that is purposely being denied, and they're right. There is the soft bigotry of low expectations and how successful it has been. They look around and they see all the evidence that they're wrong. Their success stories all
over this country. People started with nothing and have what, however, they define success it's all around them, but yet they don't want to get rid of that victims status. It's just too comforting and it explains their failure as being somebody else's fault, not their own. That's the politics of all this