Clinton War Room Back in Action

Remember back in the early days of this program, when the uh the left was telling us that we needed safe sex out there, in the safe sex equal to condom. And of course why I said, let's illustrate how effective that will be. And I wouldn't out speeches, and I put a condom over a microphone, calling it safe talk, trying to illustrate that the condom would protect the audience

of anything offensive or rank that I might say. I don't think it's too early here to start thinking about e I V. Email condoms and in message condoms at least prevent your keyboard from being stained other than your dress. Um. The only way for safe emails to be sent the e I B keyboard condom. Let's look at how the

Democrats are playing this. First off, it's sort of a pattern in of you you go back and you look at two thousand two and two thousand four, uh, in terms of these mid term elections, and two thousand four was again a year that they thought they were gonna win big with carry and take back the House and everything. They started off in this campaign season with the culture of corruption. They We're gonna make real hay out of Jack abram Off and Tom Delay number of other things.

And something came along and preempted that. William Jefferson Congressman Democrat Louisiana, and Harry Reid and a couple of other Democrats came along, gave them a problem advancing the whole notion of the culture corruption. So they dragged Jack Murtha out and they started going after the War on a Rock war and terror and so forth and so on. Uh and uh, they've they've been they've been lured now back to uh uh the culture of corruption with the Mark Fully story. They are all over the board. And

let me just tell you one thing. I'm gonna get into this in greater detail as the program unfolds today. But they do not find the people in the drive by media that you've been watching and listening to all weekend, and the Democrats, they do not find what Mark fully did to be repugnant at all. They have defended such behavior in the past, and they have gone out of their way to see to it that those who have engaged in such behavior might have been reprimanded and so

forth in a perfunctory way. But aside from mcgrievy, they all hang on Marney, Frank Garry Studs, a number of these people. They don't find what he did repugnant. And you're not hearing one concern for the children. Uh, and we still did this. Hey do not know what Folly actually did, if he ever met any of these pages, if he ever touched one of them, it's uh, it's merely an instant message and an email scandal. Meanwhile, to

coordinate the attacks are totally coordinated. Sunday afternoon, Harry Reid sent out a demand for the Attorney General to investigate the Folly scandal. That was after the d n C sent out a demand asking why Tom Reynolds covered up Congressman Folly's so called sex crimes. Then this organization called Crew has called for the House to appoint an outside council to investigate the Folly scandal. And then Democracy twenty one called on the House Ethics Committee to appoint an

outside council to investigate House Republican leaders. And they're handling of the Fully scandal. Meanwhile after that, this is a pure coordinated assault. And I'm gonna say what I think is going on. I think the Clinton war room is back up in full speed. I think that how long has this Folly stuff been known by people were talking about last year, earlier this year? Look how long may hell the National Intelligence estimate before leaking it during this

this campaign? The situation with Janine Pierro in New York, now all of her financial records have been subpoenaed by the U. S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan. Say what I think about that? Just as a little aside, I actually think that, uh, they got to Jenny in because they're bugging Bernard Carrick. And I think they were bugging Bernard Carrick to get Rudy. I think they were bugging Bernard Carrick to find out some dirt on Rudy because the

Clinton war rooms strategy. Uh, and the and the the whole bill and Hillary political strategy is not just defeat your political opponents, but destroy them. And so Fully is here being destroyed. Delay was destroyed, not merely defeated. George Allen attempting to destroy Jannine Pierro. They were attempting to destroy. Uh. It's it's it's a pattern. And of course they're willing accomplices in the drive by media are just salo fainting

over this. Uh. Meanwhile, while all this is going on, Congressman William Jefferson, Democrat Louisiana will vote for the next Speaker of the House after the elections. He's not going anywhere. Pelosi did ask him to resign, but but he said, nope, not going anywhere. And they didn't push, they didn't force the issue. Uh. So they did a perfunctory little demand William Jefferson, Democrat, Louisiana hit the highway. But Congressman Jefferson said, nope,

I'm going nowhere. And that's that. And he is he's still there. Uh. The circumstances here with with Fully or what they are, and they're they're they're indefensible. Uh. And I'm not even going to try that that that's not the that's not the point. I want to try to explain, um, why why this is happening, ladies and gentlemen. This is a this is a circumstance here where everybody's saying, uh, well, aren't the Democrats being rather hypocritical? And the Democrats there

aren't the Republicans being rather hypocritical? This is this is the way this shakes out, and it's always been the case. There is a different standard for Republicans as far as the left is concerned. The left, the Democrats look at at Conservatives and Republicans in the following fashion. Well, these guys are family values types. They're all for law and order, and they're always judging everybody else. But in the liberal view, it's not possible for them to be hypocrites because they

sqw all judgment. They don't like judgment against themselves, and whenever the people they look at as the as the judgers, the people engaging in judgment have the normal human failings, the liberals and the left pile right audit and call them hypocrites. Uh. You know, Republicans are said to be racist and sexist and bigot, bigoted, and homophobic. H. The liberal policy. Liberal philosophy is to assume bad behavior, bad human behavior. They assume it. They have a condescending look

towards people in general to what makes them liberals. People are incapable of doing the right thing without liberals guidance. People are incapable of making the right decisions to get ahead in life without liberal guidance. They're incapable of earning a decent living. Uh. And when the when these people don't vote for liberals, then those people also become stupid. Liberalism assumes bad human behavior and then coddles it as imperfect.

And after they coddle imperfect bad human behavior, uh, they are able to say those who judge imperfections and people uh and come out strong for right and wrong, the simplistic black and white good versus evil people who come out for law and order and so forth, they're the sinners because none of us are perfect. The liberals understand this. They coddle the imperfections. They create victims out of those who are imperfect, turning them into a cause celeb and

blaming uh the right. Uh. These these draconian, uh, intolerant, inflexible people who judge others while ignoring their own foibles. Uh. This explains why the liberals are able to accept genocide in places like a rock if it furthers their agenda. There's everybody's you know, every everybody's flawed. Uh. Saddam Hussein's flawed, and he's just a bad guy. We understand that we

need to understand this about about people. They expect the worst from people, and they want the worst from people tolerated. And that is a sign of compassion when you look at the absolute dregs of society, worthless shreds of human debris or other people who are simply in perfect in one way, or which we all are by the way. Um, they want to tolerate this as design a compassion. Their view of Conservatives and Republicans is that we are intolerant

of anybody who's not like us. Uh, and and so we must be made to pay the price for holding a standard that they do not. They hate being. I'll give you a quick illustration. When Clinton was elected during the week leading up to the inaugural I've told you this story before. He had all these parties and ceremonies and little little get togethers on the mall in Washington, and people like Aretha Franklin and there to sing and

other big lib time entertainers. And the list of songs they were singing were songs uh like we Shall overcome or we got out of jail today, all because a liberal Democrat had been elected after the twelve years of the judgmentalism of the Reagan and Bush years, they actually felt read from a a a straight jacket of judgment where they knew they came up short. They don't want to be judged, and they love to go after those who do the judging when there are foibles among those

on that side of the aisle. It's as simple as what I have been saying, Power no matter what, uh is to get their way. Uh. Power no matter what nothing is to get in their way, nothing of reacquiring it. Uh. The truth is that the people on the left who are acting all outraged and stunned and angry, they don't see what Clinton or Barney frank or Gary Studs did as repugnant. In fact, a few of those things as private matters that didn't affect anybody's work. And it's nobody's

business what somebody does with their private life. Particularly when it comes to sex. Now, we all think this is hypocritical and their part, but they don't look at it as being hypocritical at all, because the party of mark Fully to them is the party of judgment and who gave them the right to judge anybody, even though the Liberals are the ones that do all the judging and genuinely condemn most people to incompetence and failure. As I say,

they don't find what mark Fully did repugnant. They're not upset about that. They just see this as an opportunity, folks. It's an opportunity to once again gin up hatred and anti voting patterns for the Republicans. In all of this, they still can't tell us what they believe in. They still can't tell us what their policy and the rock is. They still can't tell us what they're going to do

about domestic problems such as immigration. They don't dare They still do not give people a reason to vote for them. They're on the war path trying to get as much hate and vilification as they feel revd up in the general population for Republicans and George W. Bush no accident that the Woodward Book is out now. Woodward even admits his objective was not to get the truth out. His objective was to get the book out prior to the elections,

and he's done that. Remember, they can't possibly find what Fully did repugnant. They have defended it before when on their side, on the other hand, you got Bob Livingstone and Newt and a list of others who resign over such things. The left celebrated for such things. Clinton is still held up as a guy a lot of liberal Democrat women would love to have some private time with as long as he's good at hammering Republicans and hammering

the GOP and now hammering Fox News. You think this is an accident they're going after Fox News before the kind of stupid if you ask me, But they they still are. Don't forget Nina Burley who once said she'd give Clinton a b J just for keeping abortion legal. Uh so, there's there's no This idea that they find the behavior of Mark fully repugnant and unacceptable is just b s. All this is is an opportunity that they've been waiting for. People have known about this obviously for

a long time. You wonder how ABC got these emails five weeks before the election. You wonder why Janine Piro is being subpoened by the U. S attorney. You wondered by George Allen's being destroyed on the front page of the Washington Post for two to three weeks while the racial epithets honored by his opponent go practically unnoticed. It's a campaign. The Clinton war room is in full speed operation.

They cannot afford to lose this election. And oh eight, I have my suspicions about all this because I know the Liberals like every square inch my glorious naked body, not just the back of my hand. And what do we have here? We have really the instant messages of the big deal, not the emails. Emails are sort of mild. It's those I ms that got published. And how old was this page when those I m s are going back and forth? Seven seventeen? There's also now I just

have to ask the question, because I don't know. I'm not around sixteen or seventeen year olds, but how many of them save instant messages like that? Uh, just just on their own? What I'm getting at is, uh, it is not beyond the realm of possibility here at all. That This was a setup from the get go because of what people have known about Mark foley sexual orientation, as they're now saying, uh, for many years. Here's a

supposedly ostensibly safe seat. Here we are in the election campaign, with the Clinton war room in full speed operation, and all of a sudden things that people have known for a long time suddenly surface once again thanks to our old buddy Brian Ross at at ABC. Now, if you've got a sixteen or seventeen year old page genuinely scared and frightened about all this, save the stuff. It's embarrassing. What if somebody sees this outside of who you intend

to see it? I'm just thinking out loud here, what if somebody got to the page? So you know, we want you to set folly up when you do a little titilating thing here, keep it and save it and so forth. How would you get a kid to do that? Now? Who knows? You threaten him or pay him as any number of ways. Given the kind of people that we're dealing with and talking about here. Uh Now, folks, I don't want to be misunderstood here. I'm not trying to mount any kind of a defense that's a bad word.

I'm not trying to uh get into a defense of what Mark Folly did. Please don't misunderstand. I'm just telling you that the the the orgy and the orgasm that has been taking place in the media since Friday, and with the Democrats, Uh, it's all coordinated and it's all it's all oriented towards the election. There's no concerned about the kid, no concerned about the children. Uh, there is, there is. There's not even any real problem with what Folly did. As we've discussed in their in their hearts

and minds and their crotches. They don't have any problem with what Folly did. They've defended it all the over

the years. Now, according to The New York Times, the FBI has begun a preliminary investigation into these emails of Mark Foley and the page and these instant messages, and the Speaker to the House, Denny Hastert, has asked a question he since the communications appear to have existed for three years, there should be an investigation into the extent that there are persons who knew or had possession of these messages but did not report them to the appropriate authorities.

This is from a letter that hasted sent to the Justice Department. He said, it is important to know who may have had the communications and why they were not given to prosecutors before. Now, well, that's uh, that's a great, great point. I don't know about you, but especially during a heated election season, I don't believe in coincidence. And Hassard Hastard is raising the uh point himself in his letter to the to the Justice Department. Uh, I I the timing of all of this. I mean, who benefits

from the timing of all this? You always look at that, or I always do who benefits from this? Um? This? This this has more to do uh about helping Nancy Pelosi in the House Democrats then protecting teenagers, uh with with whom fully was communicating. Why. I mean, if if they've known about this, as people are saying for all these years, then where is the concern for the children, Where is the concern for what was going on with this page unless they knew? Uh, there's there's too much

happening here of this. And I'm gonna folks will tell you what. This is not anywhere near the end. We've got five weeks to go, and I am sure that there are other things in their hopper that they're going to be whaa. Lookye here breaking news that has been planned for months. I have no idea. What. Uh, there's a coordinated assault on Fox News now. David Boder the

Associated Press has a hit piece on Fox News. And there was the most ridiculous piece of the New York Times weekend review section on Fox News yesterday that it's all about how Democrats are fighting back, finally fighting back at Fox News. It's the premise of that is mind boggling to me. But they're trying to rev up their base. They're gonna end up revving up the Republican base as well.

At the same time, had a great weekend with some friends, are talking about all this stuff, and I I made the point that the Clinton war room is back in action. I Carville and Begala out there with their new book Acting Juvenile wherever they go, uh, and just it's just it's a pure smear and destroying machine. Somebody said, well, what where are the Republicans on this? You know, how how come the Republicans don't don't have a war room

type operation? Nice? Come on, you're asking this after all these years that this kind of stuff is the Republican couldn't smear a bagel with cream cheese if they had to. It's just it's not who they are. It's not it's not how they play. They look. They're not circling the wagons around uh around fully They're they're they're not doing any They're on the they're on the cutting edge of hounding a guy out of town just as much as the as the Democrats are. And you can't help but

think about about this stuff like Clinton. I mean, if if Clinton had a fraction of a sense of responsibility uh, such as delay or or or even fully um, he would have resigned within an hour of the allegations of Lewinsky or the Kathleen Willie revelations, maybe even the one need to Broderick uh revelations. And if Mark fully behaved the way Bill Clinton behaves, Folly would still be in the House trying to smear the ABC reporters and threatening

to revoke the broadcast license. He'd be calling Bob Iger at ABC trying to get the story retract and uh, and he would get as many of his cronies in his office and the Republican Party helping him out getting back to smear. Instead, he just quit. He said, I'm out of here. And one of the things, I actually think his resignation has angered the Democrats because by quitting, he's gone. I mean, they can't talk about him anymore now They've they have to make this a Republican wide scandal.

If fully were still there, and if fully were fighting us the way that Bill Clinton would fight it, the way Congressman William Jefferson, Democrat Louisiana would fight it, why he would remain a huge target and they would be. And they're still digging deep into his past, the FBI looking at all this, but he's sort of taking himself off the radar, checked into rehab. Is supposedly here because of uh an alcohol problem. Yeah, I mean, it's just

it's sort of comical to watch this. Liberals show all this mock horror at the comparison because the pages were under age. But I don't know if he ever touched one. Has anybody? Am I missing something here? Has there been a story yet that he ever met the page or touched the page UH in any of these suggestive ways made public in the instant messages. Now this group crew and I forget what this stands over. They're part of

the coordinated Efforts c R E w Uh. They have had a crucial role in the in the revelation of what Folly's instant messages were. And this is pretty well timed. I don't, as I say, like Hastart, I don't believe in coincidences. Uh. It turns out that this group Crew has been behind the demands for investigations of Kurt Weldon, Tom Delay, Sam Johnson, Richard Pombo from California, Santorum, Roy Blunt, Bill Frist, Saxby Chamblist, Richard Shelby, Charles Taylor, a lot

of other Republicans. Uh. And then they also demanded an investigation of Congressman William Jefferson, Democrat Louisiana after became clear the Isaac Crook. Uh. And of course that that allows them to say, hey, we are not partisan. Here we are We're we're nonpartisan people. Now, this outfit Crew is an i R S designated five oh one C three not for profit group that means it's tax exempt based on its representation to the government that it isn't political.

But they've gotten money from George Soros's Open Society and a lot of other extremely wealthy leftists them. The bottom line with all this is, once again, don't be fooled. They don't find what fully did the slightest bit wrong. They just see it as an opportunity to trash citizens for responsibility and ethics in Washington. That's what crew is.

I was having a having a mental block out there. Nevertheless, this is just an opportunity for them to point fingers at the people they think are holier than now, the Party of law and order, the Party of right and wrong, Christian right, the moral and as such this I say, there's a different standard. The Liberals never make themselves out to be cleaning pure as the wind driven snow. They never set themselves out to be anything superb in any of those areas. So when they have their failings, nobody

can really accuse them of of hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is their main weapon here that they're that they're using in this in this effort to discredit the entire Republican Party, and they're really feeling their oats. I've seen similar people on TV over the weekend, and they are energized to the point of being angry. Uh. But we'll just see I you know, the abramof scandal was announced last week or not there was an update in it somehow four and some odd contacts in the White House with with Karl Rove.

And I don't think anybody cares. The Abramoft scandal has has sort of worn itself out there. The emotional reservoir that people have for that sort of thing is uh, pretty pretty narrow, and it's not deep, and it's already been um, it's already been spent. I didn't get the impression that was a big deal. I tried to make it a big deal. I think when it comes to abrama type scandals, most people that vote in this country

assume that that standard operating procedure. In Washington, I mean, when was the last time lobbyists were popular, Really, when was the last time lobbyists for poputer? They haven't been popular a long time. And the idea that there are people like abram running around as a shock and of course, sex scandals in Washington not new page scandals, not new I think they're in the process of overplaying their their hand here because once again, in all of this, we

still don't hear what they're for. We still don't hear what they're gonna do when they reclaim their power other than they're gonna do things smarter, but they don't have an agenda that they there announced. Let's go to the phone,

Cynthia and St. Louis your first. Nice to have you with us on the E I B Network today, High Rush, I just want to say, as a conservative Democrats who's been disappointed with both parties for a long time but still votes Republican, I've actually considered sitting it out this year because I began to see distinctions without much of a difference. I've become disillusioned with Republicans also until now. There are so many implications about this, most of which

you've covered. The one that really stands out in my mind, which is why I voted for Republicans in the first place, which is the hypocrisy of the Democrats when all this was going on with with Bill Clinton. As far as Kathleen Willie wanted to Broderick and Paula Jones, they were trailer trash, dragon dollar through a trailer park, nuts and sluts, all this stuff. That's what the Democrats did to the

what I believe were real victims of Bill Clinton. However, you don't hear a peep out of the Republicans saying anything about these angelic sixteen and seventeen year olds, which I doubt so very sincerely. They're not standing behind Mark Folly. I don't think he did anything criminal that remains to be seen. It was Tawdrey. But I applaud them for not doing both of those, for not the victims and not standing behind Folly. It's a it's an interesting point.

I remember James Carville made the comment, you dragon dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll pick up. I et Paula Jones. Uh. They did try to destroy the reputations of any of the well. They had a whole Bimbo eruptions unit that Betsy Right headed up early in the nineteen nineties into the campaign of nineteen ninety two. And anytime these women came up, it

was search and destroy, it was destroy him. Uh. And and there were a lot of them, and the ones that they did destroy sent a message to the other ones to stay quiet. Look what will happen to you. If the Republicans were the same, we'd be trying to find his page, drag him through the mud, find out everything about this kid talk about how he was this or that and the other things. Set poor old congressman fully up. Why all these people telling lies about Congressman Folly,

Why this is his unconscionable weekend? You're right, ex excellent point. The Republicans are not circling the wagons around fully and they're not going after the accuser like the Clintons make a habit of doing excellent excellent observation out there, Cynthia. I appreciate it. Then it's you bet Dennis in Chicago. You're next. Great to have you with us today stairs, we kick off a brand new broadcast week Hi, Rush,

probably be one of your over twenty million law informed listeners. Um. I agree with your analysis, but you're spending it a little. I mean, we should expect more from Republicans than this, and and and you and others that have a lot of influence should go after whoever cover this up. I mean, what we expect Bill Clintons to go and do what they do and wait, wait, wait, who's covering it up? I'm not well, there are probably people within in Halfred's office.

They're saying that half staffers may have known about this for quite some time. And we should expect more. The democratically expect this behavior from that. We don't expect it from Republicans. I don't think you're getting it from Republicans. That's that's the point. Cynthia and St. Louis, I think made a great point. There's a tremendous difference. Now. I I saw Newt right before the program started. I saw

Newt was on one of the cable channels. They asked him about this is I think that they didn't know the standard this. I think a year ago somebody was dispatched to talk to fully to set this down. It was dangerous, it was improper, and they thought they had it handled. Um. I we'll have to wait and see who knew what when. But don't don't forget democrats knew a lot too about what was going on and the timing of all this. You know, it's it's it's um,

it can't be. It can't be divorced in the circumstances. The Republicans are not trying to cover this up and they're not trying to back out of it, and they're not trying to I mean, they're leading the call for the investigation into all this. But you don't You don't think they're forced into doing that. I mean, I'm sure they've know, like you said, they've known about this and

shouldn't tolerate there. This is the party that's in charge of national security, and people expect no plan from the Democrats. They expect the Democrats to behave like this. It's part of just who they are. But we we, the Republicans

and the staffers, should not tolerate this. Well. This is why, you know, when I say at the very beginning of the program, there is a there's a double standard for Republicans because they do portray themselves as the party of loyalty and lay on art, loyal law and order, and they portray themselves as, uh, the party of morality, what with the Christian right and so forth. But I you know, I think if you look at this, it seems to

me the Republicans are not being tolerant of this at all. Uh. It's quite a comparison between the way the Democrats deal with all this and the way the Republicans do. And in the context of what's happening here going into the election, don't look at this is spin. I mean, I the Democrats are trying to create an impression about Republicans that

isn't true, as they always do. They are engaged in personal seek seek can destroy uh smear missions here, and they've got willing accomplices and drive by media that helped them do it at each and every turn. And this is a an opportunity here, opportunity. It's a circumstance. I think that demands that Republicans you know, be the right thing morally, which they're doing here. But understand the game that's being played. Uh. We're gonna learn more about the timing and of all this is the uh in the

coming days. Just I want to warn you, Dennis, this is not the last of these so called revelation breaking news stories. I think the entire campaign season from here on out is going to feature a number of things like this. I think they're laying in wait. I think

they're categorizing, they're on a list. Uh. They've been you know, doing opposite and research, have this stuff ready to go, uh, and it's going to be you know, released in a systematic way, timed to just overwhelm the voting population with negative ideas and thoughts about the very existence and humanity of Republicans. Folks, you have to understand this. This thing that's happening with Foley is not in a vacuum. Look,

George Allen delay, there's a political indictment, pure and simple. Uh. Janine Piro in New York Coman, the National Intelligence Estimately, this this is this is um what the Democratic Party exists to do. It exists as this kind of an operation. It's not a party that puts forth ideas. It's not a party that's willing to debate those ideas. It's not a party. They can't afford to. They have to destroy, discredit, smear their opponents who they feel will beat them, embarrass them,

humiliate them, or what have you. Now. On the other hand, you people, some of you people out there think that I'm spinning, and I mean you you missed the point. Let's take a look at the case of Congressman William Jefferson, Democrat Louisiana. How long did it take for Nancy Pelosi and a couple others in the House to make a superficial, perfunctory request that he resign and what did it take? It took finally a government document that he had ninety

thousand dollars in cold cash in his freezer. But remember how that document came out, Remember that the Justice Department raided his office. What did the Republicans do? Sided with the Democrats, sided with Congressman William Jefferson Democrat Louisiana. Uh, rather rather than UH rammed William Jefferson down the throats of the Libs and demanded he get out of the House for activity that is embarrassing and beneath the dignity of the House of Represents. Whatever the hell you want

to say. They're just too damn stupid that they joined with the Democrats to whine about Justice Justice Department getting the records of Congressman William Jefferson Democrat Louisiana all on the basis that the House is sancrosacks separation of powers. We can't have the Justice Department coming in here, executive branch or what have you. That's why I say they they couldn't smear a bagel if you gave them the cream cheese. It just not who they are. It's never

gonna happen. Republicans are not going to recruit a bunch of lawyers who do nothing but go out and try to destroy Democrats. They're just not going to do it. Republicans have this claim, little old fashioned notion that elections are about issues, and then they're gonna run on those