Britta Clark schools @geoengineering1 on "How to argue about solar geoengineering". This will only encourage him, and generally make him even more insufferable in future. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/japp.12643
Jan 24, 2023•1 hr 47 min
Cameron Wood shows experimentally how phosphate fertilizers catalyse silicate weathering, but the lack of a techno-economic analysis (TEA) leaves @geoengineering1 with questions. Paper: Impacts of dissolved phosphorus and soil-mineral-fluid interactions on CO2 removal through enhanced weathering of wollastonite in soils https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883292722003158
Jan 21, 2023•1 hr 2 min
How do you compare biochar to DAC, or afforestation to enhanced weathering? Plug all the details into Solene Chiquier's galaxy brain, that's how. She's like the Oracle of Delphi (but much less weird). The podcast's paper: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2022/ee/d2ee01021f A comparative analysis of the efficiency, timing, and permanence of CO 2 removal pathways. Other useful links: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/YA/D2YA00108J CO2 removal and 1.5 °C: what, when, wh...
Jan 16, 2023•1 hr 8 min
Donn Viviani & Dan Galpern look at how individual petitioners could put an end to US firms' deployment of SRM. Background info provided by guests: Current petition and lawsuit available at cprclimate.org In my 2015 petition I explicitly asked for a section 4 rule to develop data, if EPA lacked the information to make a risk finding. It could serve as a template for a geoengineering information request https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/petition_oa_tsca_2014_final_2.pdf...
Jan 13, 2023•1 hr 51 min
Dr. Maria-Elena Vorrath shares disturbing stories of sexual harassment and borderline modern slavery in academia. This episode also concludes discussion of PYMICCS from pt 1.
Jan 06, 2023•35 min
Maria-Elena Vorrath discusses the Pymiccs project, combining enhanced weathering and biochar https://cdrterra.de/en/consortia/pymiccs
Jan 06, 2023•54 min
Max Franks explores the link between the price for a carbon tax and the optimal subsidy for CDR. How and why do they differ? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S009506962200122X
Jan 04, 2023•1 hr 32 min
Luke Iseman and Andrew Song from "Make Sunsets" explain why they've launched SAI balloons and sold cooling credits to customers.
Dec 31, 2022•2 hr 8 min
After pausing to school @geoengineering1 on the rock cycle in pt1, Ingrid Smet from Fieldcode finally gets chance to describe her cotton field trials of enhanced weathering in Greece. https://www.carbon-drawdown.de/blog/2022-11-17-carbon-negativeclimate-positive-cotton-preliminary-results-of-the-very-first-enhanced-weathering-field-experiment-in-greece-in-2021 useful links: Fieldcode Climate Positivity efforts: https://fieldcode.com/en/why-us/climate-positivity Why is Fieldcode setting up their ...
Dec 23, 2022•1 hr 39 min
Ingrid Smet brings @geoengineering1 up to speed on the chemical and geological processes behind enhanced weathering for carbon dioxide removal. Check pt2 for details of her experiment.
Dec 23, 2022•40 min
Robert Höglund argues that companies with low CO2 emissions should pay for high quality CDR. @geoengineering1 pushes back, on what amounts to a licence to pollute for dirty industries. Report: bridging the ambition gap https://carbongap.org/report-bridging-the-ambition-gap-a-framework-for-scaling-corporate-funds-for-carbon-removal-and-wider-climate-action/
Dec 08, 2022•1 hr 14 min
Do CDR models serve to entrench existing societal injustices, or challenge them? Simon Hollnaicher tries to explain the answer to @geoengineering1, who interrupts more often than a BBC Radio 4 news presenter. Paper: Hollnaicher, S. (2022). On economic modeling of carbon dioxide removal: Values, bias, and norms for good policy-advising modeling. Global Sustainability, 5, E18. doi:10.1017/sus.2022.16
Dec 06, 2022•1 hr
Can one governance system rule all technologies? Gabriel Weil defends his universal framework in the face of an absolute onslaught from @geoengineering1. Main paper Global Climate Governance in 3D: Mainstreaming Geoengineering within a Unified Framework University of Pittsburgh Law Review, Vol. 81, No. 3, (2022) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3837950_code1648032.pdf?abstractid=3788661&type=2 Other works discussed. The Carbon Price Equivalent: A Metric for Comparing Climate ...
Nov 19, 2022•1 hr 41 min
This isn't really a Reviewer 2 episode, it's just some audio we had lying around. We decided to use it, as we have been too lazy to do a proper episode.
Nov 16, 2022•45 min
Robert was too lazy to to write a paper, but his blog got quite a lot of attention, so we let him on. Blog: What is the value of temporary carbon removal? https://roberthoglund.medium.com/is-there-value-in-temporary-carbon-removal-84aa69a7c428
Nov 16, 2022•1 hr 9 min
Wilfried Rickels' paper proposes a central bank to subsidise CDR and control carbon permit prices. What could possibly go wrong? Paper: Removal Certificate Reserves to Manage Carbon Prices on the Path to Net-Zero Author links open overlay https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102858
Nov 13, 2022•1 hr 7 min
We're back, after an extended period of laziness! Lauren schools us on modelling and emulating Volcanic Climate Impacts. Paper: Unknown Eruption Source Parameters Cause Large Uncertainty in Historical Volcanic Radiative Forcing Reconstructions Lauren R. Marshall et al https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033578
Nov 08, 2022•1 hr
Could SRM trigger a catastrophe that kills billions? Aaron Tang @aawktang and Gideon Futerman @GFuterman treat this subject with the seriousness you'd expect from Reviewer 2, as they giggle their way through the episode like a couple of tipsy, potty-mouthed schoolgirls. Paper https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.720312 Other links: https://theprecipice.com/ https://whatweowethefuture.com/uk/ https://www.amazon.co.uk/Collapse-Complex-Societies-Studies-Archaeology/dp/052138673X
Aug 19, 2022•1 hr 43 min
Julian Turecek from AspiraDAC and Rohan Gillespie from Southern Green Gas discuss modular DAC using MOFs with @geoengineering1 . Reviewer 2 (and its individual contributors) is not affiliated with or endorsing the capital raise discussed in this show. Seek professional advice before investing. Capital is at risk in most equity investments.
Aug 08, 2022•49 min
Shikha Bhasin from the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (ceew.in) explains how the Montreal protocol could be a key tool to regulate SRM. Paper: https://www.ceew.in/publications/solar-geoengineering-and-montreal-protocol
Aug 04, 2022•1 hr 25 min
Benjamin Sovacool gives @geoengineering1 a bad case of imposter syndrome, with his monster opinion survey of expert views. Papers discussed: Climate protection or privilege? A whole systems justice milieu of twenty negative emissions and solar geoengineering technologies https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629822001160 Risk–risk governance in a low-carbon future: Exploring institutional, technological, and behavioral tradeoffs in climate geoengineering pathways tradeoffs https...
Jul 27, 2022•49 min
Ben Rubin defends the Carbon Business Council from an attempted mauling by @geoengineering1 https://www.carbonbusinesscouncil.org/ https://twitter.com/CO2Council https://www.linkedin.com/company/carbonbusinesscouncil/ https://www.carbonbusinesscouncil.org/news/launch
Jul 21, 2022•59 min
Wake Smith explains two recent papers on aviation to @geoengineering1. The first deals with low altitude (13kms) polar deployment, using existing aircraft concepts. The second deals with deployment at 25kms, which adds cost and complexity over the usual 20kms injection patterns in the literature. Links https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1663044/v1 and https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2515-7620/ac4f5d
Jul 12, 2022•1 hr 6 min
It's all about fracking! Sasha Wilson explains carbon negative oil to the covid-zombie formerly known as @geoengineering1. Paper: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883292722001494 Unlocking the potential of hydraulic fracturing flowback and produced water for CO2 removal via mineral carbonation Bizhou Zhu, Siobhan A. Wilson, Nina Zeyen, Maija J. Raudsepp, Ashkan Zolfaghari, Baolin Wang, Ben J. Rostron, Katherine N. Snihur, Konstantinvon Gunten, Anna L. Harrison, Daniel S. Aless...
Jul 07, 2022•1 hr 7 min
Ilaria Quaglia explains what's potentially the most important SRM paper in over 10 years to @geoengineering1 Paper: https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5757/2022/ An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide Ilaria Quaglia, Daniele Visioni, Giovanni Pitari, and Ben Kravitz
Jun 09, 2022•24 min
Michael Diamond gives a very one-sided interview with a muted @geoengineering1, explaining when we should stop researching MCB. Paper: To assess marine cloud brightening's technical feasibility, we need to know what to study—and when to stop https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2118379119
Jun 04, 2022•52 min
Chad M. Baum discusses his expert elicitation work on space mirrors. (Reading list / glossary below paper link) Paper: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Volume 158, April 2022, 112179 Between the sun and us: Expert perceptions on the innovation, policy, and deep uncertainties of space-based solar geoengineering Authors: Chad M.Baum, Sean Low; Benjamin K.Sovacool. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112179. Acronyms CDR Carbon Dioxide Removal GEO Geosynchronous Orbit GENIE (project) GeoEng...
Jun 02, 2022•1 hr 7 min
Will Grant explores moral hazard, and capital & cultural lock in. Hosted by Aryan Gupta https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/14614529211069839 What do we mean when we talk about the moral hazard of geoengineering? Katelyn Tsipiras, Will J. Grant
May 30, 2022•35 min
Simone Tilmes discusses ozone changes in the geoengineering model Intercomparison project (GeoMIP) with @geoengineering1. Paper: https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/4557/2022/ Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate aerosol and solar dimming climate interventions based on the G6 Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations Simone Tilmes, Daniele Visioni, Andy Jones, James Haywood, Roland Séférian, Pierre Nabat, Olivier Boucher, Ewa Monica Bednarz, and Ulrike Niemeier
May 29, 2022•1 hr 6 min
In this fact-packed monster episode, Matthew Realff brings news of Georgia Tech's amazing fibre DAC sorbents. Then he EVENTUALLY gets round to talking about his actual paper, as well as explaining lots about the fundamental cost and energy efficiency limits of DAC. @geoengineering1 was loving all the new info. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ghg.2136 Assessing the physical potential capacity of direct air capture with integrated supply of low-carbon energy sources Steffen Fahr, J...
May 28, 2022•1 hr 38 min