Hello, thank you for listening to Reversing Climate Change. I really appreciate that. My name is Ross Kenyon, I'm the host of Reversing Climate Change and I have been for about 8 1/2 years now. I've been working in climate for that same amount of time as well. This podcast is a repository of learnings, observations, thoughts, feelings, the gathering of so much content
about so many different topics. This is a little bonus episodes, the topic so broad I couldn't hope to do justice to it, but my goal is to say something that might make you think as a little bite sized episode before you go about your day. Normally I run a little segment at the beginning of the show talking about our sponsors. I'll just tell you about them now very quickly. Absolute climate.
Peter Miner, one of their Co founders, was on the show a few months ago talking about how they are actually supporting registries within carbon removal and carbon offsetting so that registries do not need to develop their own methodologies. They actually think it's a better system if that function is not affiliated with the registries themselves. And that's typically how it's been done.
So Absolute is proposing a new way of doing things through which registries are not the main actors in methodological development. They have a very interesting business model and that episode's great. I highly recommend it. The link is in the show notes. The other sponsor of this show is Philip Lee LLP. Once you've been in carbon removal or climate tech long enough, it probably doesn't even take that long before you realize that you need competent legal advice.
The big deals that happen in business, the big deals that happen in the carbon removal or climate business, they need representation. Philip Lee LLP has received accolades for their work supporting VCM actors. So if you're working in the voluntary carbon market space, working on a big deal, you need legal advice, consider Philip Lee LLP. Guess what? I'm also just going to skip telling you about why you should give the show 5 stars rate and review it, blah blah blah and
become a paid subscriber. I'm going to skip that today. You know, I just don't feel like doing it. I don't. I don't always love the begging. So hey, I'm just going to give this one to you. Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law. Who said that? I think Jesus said that. He did not say that. Actually, I think that was Aleister Crowley or someone like that. OK, whatever. Weird start weird start to this
show. OK, so actually today I'm going to talk about Veteran's Day. I have long appreciated this holiday. Many of the big holidays, they're treated as a day off. There's not much of A remembrance, There's not much of A federation that takes place on them. But I actually think veteran's day is one that can be really beautiful. I like thinking of it in its original method of celebration.
It's Veteran's Day, but I actually like referring to it and thinking of it and casting my mind backwards into when it was called Armistice Day. after World War One, on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month, World War 1 ended. World War One is not a very well understood war. As an American, we very much, we very much look to World War 2 as our sort of defining war. I think for the most part it's the most easily understood of them.
In actuality, it's much more complicated than it looks, but the story is seductive. The bad guys very obvious. The Nazis are the bad guys. And obviously this is complicated though, because the US was allied or did Lend Lease and then was allied with the Soviet Union. And this created a whole bunch of storytelling difficulties here that I don't necessarily need to go into right now. But suffice it to say, Allies good, Nazis bad is like a suitable stand in story. For the most part.
World War One does not have that. If you ask people what World War 1 is about, I think in many cases they probably couldn't tell you. I think if you do get an answer, the answer is something like treaties. And it was about why you shouldn't be allied to so many countries. Because once the diplomatic deal start triggering, 1 is forced into war. And therefore we should be very careful about which kinds of alliances we should actually see with other nations. Which is a fine point.
And there are books that explain this and document this very well, books like The Guns of August by Barbara Tuchman. This book has come up on a number of shows. It's a great book. She's an amazing writer, amazing popular historian. Highly recommend reading any and all Barbara Tuckman books, even ones that maybe haven't aged as well as others. Like I think her her book on Vinegar Joe's Stillwell in China.
I read a book recently that really challenged some of her scholarship about China. But whatever. Like Barbara Tuckman is an amazing author, great storyteller, and she documents how the Western powers essentially sleepwalked their way into World War 11.
Of the common things that gets said about it is that it was an alliance system built by Otto von and Bismarck, Prussian unifier of the modern German state, who is such a skilled statesman that only he could have unwound the sort of doomsday machine of August 1914 when Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated. He was the only one who maybe could have kept the alliance system from clanking onward into
large scale protracted war. And when one thinks about World War One, they're pretty much always thinking about trench warfare and how brutal and slow moving and how pointless it all felt. I recently watched the new All Quiet on the Western Front, The new 1 from 2022 on Netflix. I thought it was a brilliant film, had a lot of humanity in it and a lot of the big WTF of World War One.
You have the death of idealism. You have kids who were brought up with the Latin is dulce at the quartermask pro patria Mori. How sweet it is to die for one's country, essentially. And the war is going to be over by Christmas. And of course it ends with most of your friends, or nearly all of your friends dying in gruesome ways, being put in a position where you have to enact intensely brutal violence
against others. Witness suffering, and the suffering is for goals that hardly seem worth the sacrifice. And people think of the Western Front is going over the top, as it was called, going out of the trenches and running across no man's land. And even if you took the first system of trenches of the enemy, there is defense in depth where there's lots and lots of trenches behind that on both
sides. And there's troops kept in reserve so that when that does happen and there is a breakthrough, the troops in reserve can rush back in and push the enemy back out. Static. Now we associate World War 2 and German generals like Heinz Buderian with the Blitzkrie lightning warfare. This is a reaction to getting bogged down in World War One. How do you create in a system of very long trenches like there
were in World War One? The blitzkrieg in World War 2 was using air power and armor and mechanized and motorized troops. How do you create a very small breakthrough in the line and rush a lot of troops through there and get into the backfield essentially? And that was done to amazing effect in World War 2. Once the the German invasion of France in 1940. Here I'm like, I'm looking at and right now how long it took.
It took about six weeks to conquer France in World War 2 just because of the focus on mobility, speed, concentrating power at very narrow points, breaking through, and new types of weapons for which trenches were not successful at stopping. The classic thing that people point to here, as well as the Maginot line in old yarn, is that generals are always
fighting the previous war. And one of the lessons learned from World War One in France was that they need to better prepare static defenses to make sure that when Germany invades again, they will be able to hold them at the French borders and not give any ground. This is the wrong lesson, the wrong conclusion to draw from World War One. It was much more fluid on the Eastern Front. Battles like Missouri and lakes are famous for German mobility.
It was not uniformly static trench warfare like it was on the Western Front. And there are even places that are very important to Australians and New Zealanders like Gallipoli that started off as being a zany Winston Churchill based out flanking maneuver. How can we break the Western Front and open up another front and knock Turkey out of the Central Powers?
And it didn't work. It just led to massive amounts of death and bogging down in another system of static fighting in Turkey. Though I suppose I should really be saying the Ottoman Empire. It's confusing sometimes because Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, who was the founder of the modern Turkish state after the Ottoman Empire collapse at the end of World War One, commanded Acolipoli, which is one of those
funny parts of history there. So whatever it was in Turkey slash the late Ottoman Empire, you can watch All Quiet on the Western Front to get a sense of what it was like 1917. I think he's a brilliant film to There is so much good writing.
There's so many good memoirs. And one brief side note is that if you haven't seen All Quiet on the Western Front, it's worth reading for another reason, which is that it is the book that Donald Trump has seen him say several times that his favorite book of all time is All Quiet on the Western Front. Which is a really interesting book to name because it does not have that dulce at the core of mass Propatria Mori vibe to it.
You would expect. It has a sense of the futility of war, of generals commanding troops to do things that are there to preserve the troops honor that actually don't make any sense that might lead to them losing their lives for a very small amount of ground. It doesn't even matter and it's sort of disregard of human life. It's really interesting sort of pacifistic books to appreciate, like it has sophisticated themes. It's such a mournful book.
It's hard for me to to watch or to read anything about World War One and not think about the Lost Generation, what came after in terms of art with modernism. Read someone like minus Hemingway or look at the art of Pablo Picasso and it's hard not to just see that the assumptions of the old world being obliterated. In fact, the quality of life globally after World War One was much lower than it was during the turn of the century period. It was a hard time to exist.
It just seems such a rupture. Much of the world order was based upon how much more civilized we were than the rest of the world and how there was a sort of presumed right to rule that had this sort of Rudyard Kipling, white Man Burden kind of feel that Western civilization, Western Europe, America deserved to dominate the world because they were so much more civilized and elevated than everyone else.
And World War One was one of these great fracturing moments when I think it became clear to everyone, especially those from the countries that fought in World War One, how big of a fraud that was. It's hard to make a claim of being the most civilized people on Earth, only then to to see what happened at the Psalm or Passindale and still with a straight face claim to have world leadership.
And so you see art that is so disillusioned, so much breaking can't even represent reality in a straightforward way at this point. Like it doesn't even make sense to do so anymore. Of humanity losing its way in such a desperately tremendously horrific way is the legacy of World War One. It isn't even like it ended and the bad guys lost. It's actually really hard to just say the bad guys in World War One for several reasons.
But my understanding of it, this is one of those topics that people will always be fighting about. So please don't think that I have the final word on any of this. Me summing up World War One in like half an hour is not enough time to understand World War One. Please understand that. But one way to understand what happened in World War One was that it was a Ducydides trap. Essentially, Germany was a
rising power. It was industrializing, becoming more and more powerful, but it's also surrounded on all sides. There's no natural barriers really with Germany. It's not a great place to be. You have Russia to the east, you have France to the West, and then you have the UK right above you. And then they'll do things like, and this is maybe where the the ally system comes in that is
really touchy. But the Triple Entente alliance between France, the UK, which by the way are historical enemies, France and England, I should say, and Russia, I mean, that is, that doesn't feel good at all. Functionally surrounded. And so for various reasons that were set off by the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of the Habsburg state that governed the Austro Hungarian Empire, Germany essentially tried to win A2 front war as fast as possible doing something called
Schlieffen Plan blah blah blah. I'm trying not to get bogged down in details. It's too much in any case though. Why do I love Armistice Day? These battles were so destructive, so disgusting. Truly hell on earth. I think if you were trying to find which of the historical moments were truly the worst on earth at any given point, I think being on the Western Front in World War 1 is a top contender.
Real close. Like there's something that I can think of that I can give it a run for its money, but I think that's pretty close. And when Armistice Day happened, it wasn't like when you think about World War 2 ending, World War Two had BE Day and BJ Day, victory in Europe and victory over the Japanese days. And those have a really clear story. The US1, the other side surrendered and it was a total capitulation and no negotiated
settlement. World War One ends with a negotiated settlement and it's a really intensely difficult deal for Germany. They had to give up a lot of their industrial capacity. They couldn't really have a military they owed in a ridiculously huge indemnity that they had to pay back. It was such a bad deal that it's so delegitimize the system that far right and far left parties after the Versailles Treaty we're basically guaranteed. How could there not be? You know, soldiers are going
home, workers are hungry. What's going to happen? The mainstream has so let us down. Can we trust mainstream institutions? And this is also a period where, as you probably know, a Lenin has been was sent in a in a sealed boxcar to Russia basically to knock Russia out of the war. And the Soviet Union is now also simultaneously happening here at October Revolution 1917. Stuff's going on. Lennon Lennon's at work in Russia. This is a really difficult time to enforce a strict peace deal
here. And what I liked about it is that even though the US came in and helped tip the scale on the sides of the Entente against the Central Powers, the day was declared Armistice Day because it was more of a a day of mourning. It wasn't about victory, it was about the lives that were lost and about the tragedy of the
conflict overall. And I think that's a really humane way to understand war and to understand forgiveness and to understand just how do we bring people home in a way that helps them heal and acknowledges it's not just thank you for your service. It's not just did you kill anybody over there. I think there's something that's much more important about having a day of asking what was it
ultimately for? I think this is a really common feeling for people who fought in America's wars in the Middle East. It certainly is a thought for people who fought in Vietnam. There's a sense of what was this thing that happened to us, that we were both actors within, but also history acting upon us. I suspect a fair amount of those feelings are puzzlement. It's like trying to make sense
of what even happen. It's so bad in hindsight that how do we go in there thinking that we are going to be able to do this and it would be quick and easy and not ruin so many lives? I think Armistice Day does such a beautiful job of it's a pause to conflict. It's a moment where even if it's temporary, as Armistice is often are, it's a moment of turning swords into plowshares, the symbol of Armistice Day, Remembrance Day, veteran's day.
It's less common in the US but in Commonwealth and UK and other allied powers as far as I know. I think it's mostly like UK and UK derived people's kind of celebration. It's very much focused around the poppy, and the poppy is the symbol of remembrance, of hope, of mercy, of sadness, of just what the hell happened to us. Essentially, it's a day to remember the dead. It's a day to remember what can happen to all of us when things truly get out of hand.
I think it's really important that the default option should be towards peace and to remember that even when one's cause is just, war is not a simple matter. I like reminders of our humanity. The Poppy, Armistice Day, Remembrance Day. Those make me feel mercy for the soldiers who fought and died, who did brutal things to one another and places they've never been. It makes me hope that there's an afterlife where they can be reconciled to one another.
I think anything that stresses the mistakes that we've made as a species, where we've picked up arms against one another, asphyxiated each other with mustard gas, stabbed each other with triangular bayonets, buried men alive under artillery shells, collapsing dugouts that we should remember are the people who are put into that position through naivety, through bloodlust, through earnest patriotism, and remember how easily it can be us in our lives too.
We aren't above the people who were put into these positions. Thinking about it in this way is one of the ways that I think equality and universality can be so important, because in your life you may have caused to interact. With War with Soldiers and Armistice Day asked this question of was it worth it? Can we honor these men? Can we honor these people who died by not putting people in this position unnecessarily? Can we avoid this in the future? The poppy, it's hard for me to even know.
Why is that such a beautiful symbol? Flowers are such a wonderful symbol, or seemingly universal, or very nearly so. The transient nature of beauty, the flowering of youth, the awareness of 1's mortality and of how brief and how fragile life is. I'm actually going to read the poem that the poppy tradition drives from by Canadian doctor from the Western Front named John Mccrae. The poem is called In Flanders Fields. Here it is in Flanders fields.
In Flanders fields the poppies blow between the crosses, row on row that marker place. And in the sky the lark still bravely singing fly scarce heard amid the guns below. We are the dead. Short days ago we lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow, loved and we're loved. And now we lie in Flanders fields Take up our quarrel with the foe to you from failing hands we throw the torch Be yours to hold it high. If you break faith with us who
die, we shall not sleep. Though poppies grow in Flanders fields one thing I like about this poem is that poppies as a narcotic. There's also a sense that the dead are not merely dead, they're sleeping. There's a Christian resurrection of the dead. There will come a time when they might live again. Don't mourn for us. We're merely sleeping. But I find to be a really beautiful, comforting thought.
Happy Armistice Day. I hope you enjoyed my I can't believe I'm going to say this blitzkrieg through copies of Pacifism of Armistice Day of all of World War One. It's really too much. Sorry, I try not to get distracted. There's too many interesting stories, too many things that happened. I think a lot more attention needs to be paid to World War
One for so many reasons. It's great, great place to look where empires are collapsing, nations are coming about, the modern world is being born at this time. It's it's worth your time to study World War One. I'd say I love World War 2 as well. World War One is extremely impactful. Thanks for listening. Happy Armistice Day. Happy Remembrance Day. Happy Veteran's Day.