True personal growth ultimately will lead to fulfillment, and it's my intention with these podcasts to connect more deeply with you. Thank you for joining me, Anne Corbin, and my guests, and welcome to this episode. For this, my 100th episode, I thought I'd do something a little bit different and reflect on a number of interconnected conspiracy theories, particularly one on which more than a few people have gathered some rather credible evidence.
Even if it is all theory and conjecture, the secrecy angle is, for me something that raises some very interesting questions. A very considerable photographic record exists of so called world fairs that took place in different large cities in the United States.
In the last 2 3 decades of 19th century, that is from 18 70 or so onwards, and also in the very early years of the last century, 20th, The buildings involved were huge, often white and very elaborately designed with domed roofs and elegant columns, lavish decoration. They were elegantly arranged around complex fountains and lakes and almost none of these structures are still in existence.
The stories circulated at the time were that these were temporary structures erected specifically for these fairs, and they were then demolished pretty swiftly after the fairs, also history tells us. Here are some of the cities which hosted these fairs, New Orleans, Jamestown, Buffalo, Atlanta, Seattle, Spokane, Portland, Cincinnati, Chicago, Nashville, Omaha, New York, absolutely all over the states.
Also suspiciously, there were enormous fires in most very large cities in the states around the same sort of time. The fire in San Francisco caused by the 1906 earthquake was far from unique. It's just particularly famous, I suppose because of a very popular film, starring Clark Gable that was made in 1936.
Numerous people have commented on the size and the grandeur of these lost buildings as evidenced by the photographs and theories have been put forward about nefarious reasons for their destruction. And why have all this subterfuge? Might it possibly be because travel was becoming more popular? People were moving around more with the advent of the railroad after the push west began in the 18 sixties. The wagon trains brought settlers to, western and midwestern areas around the same time.
And in those days of horses and wagons, few people, and unsophisticated machinery, how would these elaborate buildings have proliferated in all these so called brand new cities? Think of the date. I've also seen many online photographs, particularly on YouTube, of what appear to be well or settled as in built up cities taken in broad daylight, but with hardly any people in the streets. These are usually shown in connection with theories about something referred to as the mud flood.
And the mud flood is a disaster theory often connected with the disappearance of Tartaria as a place and as a civilization. It's something that has been completely wiped off the record, so to speak. Why would so much money, energy and planning be wasted by the powers that shouldn't be, not only in wiping Tartaria off the map but also in convincing the entire population of the world, in recent times that is, that Tartaria never existed.
There are, of course, a number of other so called fringe conspiracy theories such as the earth isn't a globe, it's flat, and truly even in this day and age when we are awash with easily accessible knowledge, information, and there are more highly educated people around than ever before, it is genuinely difficult at times to distinguish between what's reasonable and what is ridiculous.
Several years ago when I first saw some documentaries on YouTube about the mud flood, I thought, what rubbish is this? But now, as I've become better informed about all sorts of suppressed information, secret societies, the influence of the Vatican, the long term planning involved, and the sheer arrogance of the so called 1%, the new world order, the cabal, Illuminati, or whatever you wanna call them, I'm always interested to see a new serious documentary that asks a few new questions.
And when the author gets into some mathematical theories and proofs, then I'm likely to become really hooked. Nick Alvear has produced a 2 part documentary available on Rumble. It's called the Tartarian Empire, and I will provide links to that in the chat. If you sorry. Not the chat. The show notes. If you like this sort of thing, well, it's approximately 2 hours long. And for me, it connects a large number of the pieces in that giant jigsaw called What are they hiding and why?
Tartaria possibly was the largest empire ever, more so than the Roman empire, anything you care to imagine. They apparently possessed skills and knowledge specifically in connection with building and the harnessing of free energy, not just for heating and propulsion, but also for the purpose of healing. Tartaria was originally located between Russia and China, and they expanded eventually eastward and eastward right into the Americas.
Very old maps record places which are described as Moscow Tarttery, Tarttery Independent, Petite tartary, Chinese tartary, and Mongol tartary, just to name a few. And Siberia, you know, Siberia, those enormously huge open spaces, they were included, and there is a phrase that keeps popping up, which is the Siberian American horde. Now Moscow Tartary wasn't where today's Moscow is, and it was conquered by the Romanovs in the 18th century. They claimed that this is the Romanovs.
They claimed descendancy from the Roman Empire, and they were incredibly resented because of the notorious poverty amongst the serfs. In other words, the peasant class specifically in comparison with ridiculous levels of luxury and opulence enjoyed by the ruling classes. The power of the Romanovs, we know, was ended in Russia with the Bolshevik revolution when Tsar Nicholas and his family were violently executed in 1918.
Around a 150 years earlier in 17/75, there was a massive peasant's revolt and that was suppressed violently. And this was when the Romanovs turned the existence of their Siberian neighbor into a national secret. All records were destroyed. Nobody was allowed to talk about it. And to enforce it, this, the infamous secret police were introduced. So I hold my hands up. I didn't research much of this myself. It mostly comes from the documentary.
But the date's interesting because just 1 year later, 17/76 is the date of American independence. Moscow Tartary was on the west side of America right at the same time that the Europeans, mainly the English but other nationalities from Europe as well, when these folks were arriving on the east side of the continent.
We know that the Mayflower and the pilgrims landed in 16/20, And the colony of Jamestown at this time was only a decade, decade and a half old, and the push west didn't happen for another 200 years or so. History and Hollywood tell us that the settlers fought natives or Indians who didn't live in cities but rather in tents, and these were divided into tribes and they rode horses and they wore feathered headdressers.
Okay. History is written by the victors, but we're supposed to believe that the whole interior of America and Canada was essentially full of various native Americans, so called Indians, nomadic and living in tribes. The alternative view is that the Romanov empire had gradually spread inwards, that is eastward, from the west coast of America, occupying where the old Tartarian empire had been. So bearing in mind that Tartarians comprised different nationalities including Mongols and Moors.
The Moors of course were well known in Europe, particularly in Spain. They were dark skinned, black even. Think of Shakespeare's Othello. And you're probably familiar with the term blackamoor. The Moors were builders. They were responsible for large scale gothic architecture in Europe, maybe also in America. The documentary is very specific about that and the Moors originated from the Mare people.
That's pronounced m e r r, but it's actually spelled k h m e r. The language spoken throughout Tartaria was Arabic and Sanskrit. And there are numerous towns even today in the states called Medina. And Islam apparently was once everywhere in the Americas. So what happened? David Edward Starmer, who was born in 1941, wrote American Holocaust in 1992, And this was all about Columbus and the conquest of the new world. Starmer is a professor or was a professor at the University of Hawaii.
The book details the largest genocide in history against the Moors who inhabited Asia and the Americas. The sustained extermination of these people continued over 400 years in both continents. But do we ever hear about it? Starmer estimates that a 100,000,000 people died or disappeared. Yes indeed, this was largely from the ravages of European diseases like smallpox, but also, here's the interesting math calculations. Did these folks form a significant part of the slave population in the states?
It's reported that 83% of all Americans with African ancestry have native American blood as well. So here's the theory. What if most of those slaves were already in America rather than brought there on ships from Africa as we are told? History tells us that between 15/40/18/50, that's just over 300 years, 15 to 20,000,000 slaves were brought to America on ships. So over 310 years, that means on average, 60,000 were transported annually. It's just not possible.
Even the biggest ships could only transport 400 slaves and we know that the death toll was horrendous because these poor souls were packed in like sardines. So if you take an average say of 300 per ship, that's from the bigger ships down to the smaller ships and even forget about the dreadful death toll, 200 voyages 200 voyages annually would be required to get 60,000 slaves over to America in 1 year. Bear in mind also that one voyage in those days would take 3 to 4 months.
The American slave database shows that only between 1114 100 voyages occurred in the entire 310 year period. So 1400, that's the top end, times 300 is 420,000 or go for the bottom end, you're only at 330,000. This is in the entire 300 years. It's a very very long way from 15 to 20,000,000 and it doesn't count for at least 14a half 1000000, maybe even as much as 19,000,000 not accounted for. So were these slaves already in the Americas? Or is the total estimate just one great big over egged lie?
We could compare this with the infamous total of 6,000,000 Jews that were apparently killed in the Nazi holocaust in Germany. Records suggest that the 6,000,000 figure just can't be backed up. Records cannot be found, and the Germans are notoriously famous for their lists and keeping records. It's estimated that in fact, under 1,000,000 were killed which is terrible enough, obviously, but it backs up the strategy of make the lie big, tell it often enough, and it will become the truth.
6,000,000 happens to be a kabbalistic number, and it has particular significance in Jewish culture. And there are records, in existence such as newspaper articles produced in, 1906 or 1910. Can't remember. Can't put my hands on any of these just at the minute, but I know I've seen them. This figure of 6,000,000 was predicted decades before the 2nd world war actually happened. The thing about big numbers is they're absolutely overwhelming.
And most of us, well, we tend to believe what we're told without questioning it. And in some of the trainings I've done, I've heard that the human mind goes 1, 2, 3, many when it has to cope with big numbers.
The second part of the documentary poses a question about whether Americans really won the war of independence or whether the declaration was an elaborate device granting significance to a number of highly placed men of the time and yet keeping America as a very special kind of colony of the British empire. The Vatican was also involved in the plot, well, wouldn't you know? And the next theories become even more outlandish but everything is supported by the evidence of a sort.
Among those Indian tribes, apparently the Cherokee refer to themselves as Roman And the Cree, well, conceivably, that does sound a bit like the word Greek. Rome as we know it was built on 7 hills along the Tiber in Italy and the Romans conquered Egypt, land of the pyramids and hieroglyphs. And the documentary asks, which Rome came first? Because evidence has been found that Washington DC was originally known as Rome and it too is built on 7 hills. DC means District of Columbia.
And Columbia, we're told, was originally a black Roman goddess. I'm not too sure about that but evidence exists somewhere. There was a Roman goddess called Libertas and of course we have the statue of Liberty which somehow has got mingled with the term Columbia. I'd say the writers were taking a few liberties with the truth, but never mind. It's all part of a very interesting theory. Both Romes have a pentagon as well, according to the documentary.
And before the Roman conquest of Egypt, the Greeks had conquered the place and that building style was known as Greco Egyptian. Along came the Romans and we had Roman Egyptian or Greco Roman. Now supposing that Egypt originally was also in America, yes, I know, this is weird, But there's very definitely a huge cover up going on because there's a huge cavern deep within the Grand Canyon, which is off limits to visitors and explorers. It's known as Kinkade's cave, and it's guarded by the FBI.
Even airspace is off limits. It's a no fly zone, and this enormous cave or cavern is full of recognizable Egyptian artifacts, wall carvings, and hieroglyphs, or so the writers maintain. So the documentary puts these theories forward about the manipulation of European history as a plausible reason for the enslavement or killings of millions of native Americans as described earlier. And we're all so much more aware than we were previously.
We've become super suspicious about recorded history and we know that it only takes a few generations for the old folks to die off or just be patronized as away with the fairies when memories of their youth don't align with what is the official recorded history. So that's it. That's not the whole documentary summarized, but I really need to stop before I groan on for too long. I'm not saying I believe all this stuff but it's very interesting and I love going a bit off piste from time to time.
You can set yourself up to win the game of life. Become familiar with the laws of the universe. You have infinite potential. You can influence reality. Quantum growth and connection explores success strategies, power principles, relationship rescue, and the quantum field.