This is Ira Glass. In Lily's family, there's a story everybody knows by heart. If this story had never happened, all of us wouldn't be here right now. Sammy wouldn't be here. be here. Wally wouldn't be here. Anyone that we know wouldn't be here. So what happens when Lily's mom tells her this story is not true? This American Life, surprising stories every week.
Pope Francis's death not only led to an outpouring of remembrances, it also unleashed a new wave of memes from the Oscar-nominated movie Conclave. it tells a very fun and very fictional story of the secretive process by which a pope is replaced. It's a twisty political thriller, it's a tense jury drama, and it's got some strong commentary on the state of the Catholic Church.
It stars Ralph Fiennes, Stanley Tucci, John Lithgow, and Isabel Rossellini, and it's available to rent or stream at home. I'm Aisha Harris. And I'm Stephen Thompson. Today on NPR's Pope Culture Happy Hour... we are revisiting our conversation about Conclave. On the latest Pop Culture Happy Hour bonus episode, we're talking about movie theater etiquette. Are there rules of etiquette for the movie theater?
What are you, nuts? Of course there are. We have thoughts on thoughts on thoughts, and you'll hear them all when you sign up for Pop Culture Happy Hour Plus episodes at plus.npr.org slash happy. Cell phones, cars, coffee. How do these goods make their way to us from overseas? And what will President Trump's tariffs mean for their price tags? Join the 1A podcast as we explore supply chains and costs associated with some of your favorite products.
It's our series, How Did This Get Here?, every Wednesday. Listen to the 1A podcast from NPR and WAMU. At Planet Money, we'll take you from a race to make rum in the Caribbean. Our rum, from a quality standpoint, is the best in the world. It's very rare for people to go inside. To the back rooms of New York's Diamond District. Planet Money from NPR. We go to the story and take you along with us. wherever you get your podcasts.
Politics may not always make sense, but we'll sort it out together over on the NPR Politics Podcast. Joining us today is Weyland Wong. She's the co-host of NPR's daily economics podcast, The Indicator from Planet Money. Hey, Weyland. Hi, the Lord be with you. And also with you. Also with us is Andrew Lapin. He's a senior reporter for the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
and the host of the podcast, Radioactive, The Father Coughlin Story. Welcome back, Andrew. Hey, great to be here. It is great to have you. Conclave is based on Robert Harris' 2016 novel of the same name. In both the book and the film, we learn that the fictional Pope has just died, setting into motion the complex process of choosing and naming a replacement.
Cardinal Lawrence, played by Ralph Fiennes, is managing the process of assembling a conclave of cardinals. Those cardinals are carefully sequestered until they can come to an agreement about which of them will become the new pope. The options include the possibly treacherous Cardinal Tremblay, played by John Lithgow.
I wonder if you really are so very reluctant to have the chalice passed to you. There's Cardinal Bellini, played by Stanley Tucci. He's openly liberal and isn't so much interested in becoming pope. as he is hell-bent on blocking the candidacy of Cardinal Tedesco, played by Sergio Castellito. Of course, there are more candidates than that, and plenty of scandals, surprises, and dark horses pop up along the way.
Conclave was directed by Edward Berger, who also did the Oscar-winning remake of All Quiet on the Western Front. Aisha Harris, I'm going to start with you. What did you think of Conclave? Look, this was not my first choice for a movie to talk about at first. I thought, oh, man, Popes, Vatican. And it was giving to me, it felt like a very...
2000s, 2010s, Miramax kind of down the middle movie that is absolutely going to rack up a ton of Oscars, whether or not it deserves it or not. I was going into this movie hemming and hawing and my arms folded. Turns out this was actually quite enjoyable. It's a great little piece that's surprisingly funnier than I anticipated. And I think funny on purpose in ways that are kind of dark and weird. And there's kind of a repetitive.
recurring motif that I think is very lighthearted and fun that I think we will get into, even though this is obviously like a very serious subject matter. But overall, I thought the performances were really great. I had a fun time. And at its heart, it's kind of a 12 Angry Men meets Mystery type of thing. with some caveats, but I'm sure we'll get into that later. Okay. How about you, Andrew? Yeah, I had a lot of fun with this one.
I see Aisha's 12 Angry Men and I'll Raise You that. To me, it felt like Columbo in the Vatican. Like, Ray Fine's just kind of walking around to each of the cardinals and holding up a document and going, just one more thing, just one more thing. And I'm fascinated by...
The Catholic Church as an institution, and I think it's a very good setting for this kind of twisty, turny political thriller where everyone has a secret and there are different factions and different visions for what they want, you know, the future to look like. And so there's this also inherently dramatic.
setting of the conclave where all the characters have to be sequestered from the outside world. And I think the movie makes a really good use of this setting. So it's claustrophobic without feeling too suffocating. But what I really appreciate is that... On the one hand, it has something that it really wants to say, that it wants to communicate.
about the Catholic Church and about its place in modern society. But it's not too heavy-handed. It does have those moments of levity and fun, which I really appreciated, and which I think make this whole thing go down really smooth. So it's like a smart, tense drama, and I was here for it. It's funny. I went into this movie the opposite as Aisha, where I was amped for this movie. Because I'll tell you what, my secret favorite movie is Angels and Demons. And I was like, I love a Vatican drama.
And I love gawking at the grotesque pageantry of the Vatican. In this movie, you've got your wax seals. You have exquisite stationery. You've got ribbons. So much ritual. Yes. So much ritual. so baroque and bonkers and is so far divorced from any actual theology and I love the camp of it and I think this movie leans into that and has a lot of fun so I was dialed in I had a great time And it really flew by for me. And I really love the performances, all these.
Cardinals and their little red beanies hissing at each other in corridors. It's all delicious. If you want to defeat Tedesco. This is a conclave, Aldo. It's not a war. It is a war. And you have to commit to a side. I will say that ultimately, there wasn't enough of a satisfying payoff for me. And so I felt like the whole was worth a little less than the sum of its parts. But the parts themselves...
Super, super fun and enjoyable. And I did get that kind of angels and demons energy from it that I really liked. Nice. Yeah, I came down pretty similarly. I dug this movie quite a bit. And when I think about, I mean, Waylon, you mentioned the sum of the parts. I mean, it's almost impossible for this movie.
for the whole of this movie to be greater than the sum of the parts because the parts are jury thriller, political thriller, intrigue, intrigue, intrigue. You mentioned the ritual of it all. This is a gorgeous looking film. I really appreciate... really could have been kind of a feast of overacting. You get a whole bunch of hams to kind of come in and give speeches at each other. There are vigorous debates about faith and the church and the factions within the church.
I appreciated how political... and felt like just the nature of that is commentary unto itself. But I didn't feel like there was a need or an attempt to really overly underline those points. You're just watching a political process pay out. even though it's kind of not really supposed to be, right? They're not supposed to be campaigning. It is supposed to sort of be... Like you are choosing a figure who is a, who is a major religious figure. And yet there are so, I say, yes.
And there are so many layers of politics underneath the surface of that. The direction the church has taken, the church's stance on different issues. What this movie is not... And I'm going to praise this movie so much for being what it's not, which is Sorkin-y. This movie is not an Aaron Sorkin-style thundering men of importance give speeches back and forth at each other. And for that, I really enjoyed and appreciated it. I hesitate to call a movie with this many twists.
Subtle? There's one twist. I think three twists before the end where I was like, oh, come on. But at the same time, I hung with it the entire time. Well, that's part of the what I was kind of alluding to with it being funnier than I anticipated is that. First of all, there are lots of twists, mini twists. And the way these twists come about is that Cardinal Lawrence, the Ralph Fiennes character, he has his sort of right-hand man, O'Malley, who's played by Brianne F. O'Byrne.
And that guy is sort of like getting the dirt on each, you know, individual cardinal who's up for the Pope role. And each time... O'Malley is coming back to him and he's like, one more thing. And it's just like, it's really fun. It feels almost as if this is like a Shakespeare, like this is the character who's like, but may I just interject? I also have feelings about this new bomb I just dropped on you. I just need to give you and I think that's part of what
to me, made this so weirdly fun and also helped us, like, to your point, Stephen, about it not being subtle. It's really not. I think the closest that it comes to being Sorkiny is the Stanley Tucci character. Because he is the guy who keeps saying, we can't go back like this other pope who is like, and again, this is where the very clear Edward Berger.
Politics, we're trying to place this in time and we are in a prime election season right now. It's like, we can't go back. Like, this is terrible. If Tedesco becomes Pope... He will undo 60 years of progress. You talk as if you're the only alternative, but Adeyemi has the wind behind him. Adeyemi? Adeyemi, the man who believes that homosexuals should be sent to prison in this world and hell in the next.
And you know it. It is underlined. Let's be clear. Stanley Tucci is the one doing the most, most of the underlining. Exactly. He even makes a Nixon reference, you know, so if you need any subtext made text, you got Stanley Tucci providing that. Yes, it's underlined, but it's not double. How about that? So you appreciate the restraint. I did really like the Cardinal Lawrence character. He's kind of like...
On one hand, this like beleaguered HR manager trying to run a very important meeting. That cannot be an email. You actually do need a meeting. He feels he's been miscast. Who feels he's been miscast. And then he has to turn into like internal affairs investigator. And that's kind of fun too.
I wish we had seen him do a little bit more detective work. Do you know what I mean? But, you know, I think that's a minor quibble. O'Malley was doing all the detective work off screen. I kind of wanted to follow O'Malley because he's the one that is like... talking to like the guy down at the docks or whatever, like Law & Order style, and we don't get to see that.
But I did really like the photocopy scene. There's this really fun trend. There's a great cut to a photocopier. Photocopy scene with Cardinal Lawrence and Isabella Rossellini's character. And it made me think about like other great photocopy scenes in cinema. And I thought of like The Firm. And I was like, we're like tense photocopy scenes. These are great. A good documents movie is worth its weight in gold. Similar to that, like any moment where that sort of.
ancient pageantry of the church was running up against modern technology was a moment I really enjoyed. There's this great little bit early on when the conclave is just starting and they're trying to like herd everybody inside and they can't hear what's going on in the outside world. And there's a shot of just a bunch of corded phones in a pile that they've clearly been ripped from the walls of the Vatican. And then they just cut to this elderly cardinal who's just sitting on his iPhone.
He's clearly about like texting someone before he's going to go into the tunnel, you know, and it's such a fun little moment. It's so great. I'd love to know, like, why are photocopiers good cinema, but like modems aren't? I think it's because they're so fallible.
they always break, right? Like Cardinal Lawrence literally encounters some kind of... inscrutable error and it's like no but i really gotta make these so you're like dependent on this incredibly fallible technology but you're on a deadline and you gotta do it before anyone discovers you it's Great. It's like the same way that.
a vote like the one that they have in Conclave is naturally great tension in the way that a jury decision is naturally great tension in any kind of pop culture. I feel like a photocopier does the same trick. We should say we don't actually know. how what the conclave works in real life this is like their best guess at sort of what what is happening behind the scenes and i appreciated that i think that adds to the sense of oh we're peeking behind the curtain but it's all a little bit
absurd and all that stuff. It's so great because it's just a little bit removed. Yeah. It looks like they're launching a nuclear sub when they flip the switch for the white smoke. Oh, yeah. It's amazing. Yeah, almost like they need multiple cardinals to flip the switch at the same time. Turn your key for the white smoke.
With regard to the white smoke and also just the photocopier of it all, I really appreciated those little details that really sort of highlight this pull, this tension between the old world or like the way things used to be done in the new world.
Yes, I know photocopiers still exist, but for the most part, like I haven't used one in a very long time. I don't know how many people who are even still working in offices necessarily use them all that often. Don't send me emails, please. But there's a moment where the sort of like. evil Tedesco. seen vaping if I'm did anyone else see this yes
Okay, thank you. And I was just like, this is hilarious. Like this old man. Because when you think of it, at least when I think of vaping, I think of like anyone under the age of 30 usually is like vaping. Yeah, what flavor do you think Tedesco is vaping? I have no idea. Blue raspberry. I feel like it.
Vaping has become the new shorthand for this character is evil. Yeah, it really has. Like, have you never seen a good person vape in a movie? And I loved that little detail. I also, one thing I would have loved to see more of is Isabella Rossellini. Although she does kind of, she has a great moment, which is also the same scene where I noticed that he was vaping, but she does have like a great moment where she kind of drops a bomb.
in front of all of these cardinals and does so with this like little smirk she's just like I'm here a glimmer in her eye yeah yeah and you know I think the movie does sort of get into, I think in an interesting way, this idea that women are still on the outside of all of this decision making. The nuns are all making the food for them. They're mostly seen but not heard. It's just like those little details. I mean, you could argue, are you just like reinforcing these things? But I do think...
As little Isabella Rossellini as there was a Sister Agnes, like, when she does show up, she shows up, she goes hard, and I was like, this is great. I struggle with that dynamic, too, because I feel like if you're going to have Isabella Rossellini in your movie as a sassy nun... So she was waiting the wings maybe a little too long for my taste, even though that does help the moment she does appear really stand out.
But then, you know, there's like another moment involving a nun character that I think kind of short changes her and her perspective. And this is something that the film is, yeah, torn between making a commentary about the fact that this is a boys club. And as you said, Aisha, sort of. Unfortunately, reinforcing that dynamic. And of course, the... The divisions that they depict in the film not only parallel our own politics, but also the politics of the Catholic Church. There are these factions.
that have divided. There are people in real life undermining the Pope. Like in many ways, the real drama at the Catholic Church is even more absurd than what you get here. It gives the film permission to touch on some of those. darker and more political aspects of its subject matter without being too beholden to the record uh so to speak well and there's a sense sometimes of like wow some elements of this are really craven
But I can also, as a viewer, sit and wonder, I wonder if they're actually worse. Like, it is definitely interested in... giving voice to doubt. It's willing to give voice to suspicion about this institution. It's not trying to necessarily undermine that institution either, right? Like, it still seems to be coming at it from a general place of there are people in this institution who are operating in good faith.
I think that is maybe part of what I ultimately found a little bit dissatisfying about this movie is I wanted it to have a little bit more to say about. Faith and doubt or about the relevance of the Catholic Church or about the ambitions of men. you know, who end up in these very powerful positions. And I feel like the movie introduced a bunch of those ideas and then ultimately did not have a whole lot to say about it.
that takes us beyond what we have explored in other films, including in Angels and Demons, LOL, which is actually about, you know, the interplay between faith and science. And, you know, I'm like, did Angels and Demons like explore these ideas the same slash a little better? Like they're not, you know, this movie. despite having many more trappings of a prestige film than Angels and Demons, you know, it's much more of like an Oscar type film. I don't actually think it...
offers that much more thematically to chew on than something like Angels and Demons, which is a very straightforward popcorn movie. I do think the evolution of the Ralph Fiennes character gets at... some of what you're talking about, Waylon, because there's this interesting dynamic where, you know, he says early on that he is a man who has lost his faith.
And then there's this through line where people keep telling him, but you want to be Pope, right? Like you secretly want to be Pope. And he has to keep, you know, he keeps denying it, denying it. And I don't want to give too much away, but there's a really interesting turn at one point in the film where the character has to ask himself,
wait, do I want to be Pope? Is that something I want? And Ralph Fiennes plays it really well and it also speaks to the allure of power within this institution even among people who seemingly have all of these doubts about it. To your point, Waylon, about angels and demons, I...
To be honest, I don't think I ever saw the movies. I'll lend you my Blu-ray and watch it at home. Well-worn. I read the books when that was like the only book that seemed to be at every airport ever, like back in the day. So I do remember reading the books. Those are very explicitly fantasy. I did find that this movie towards the end felt like its own kind of fantasy, a more subdued kind of fantasy or like a sort of fan fiction in a way of like someone who might like.
Had these ideals of what the Catholic Church from the outside who like, this is what it should be. These are the things we should be wrestling with. And then here's the ultimate outcome of all of that. And I was like, oh, this is. I mean, this is kind of silly, but also kind of cool. And but at the same time.
I was laughing by the end of it. Multiple people in my screening, including these two ladies who were actually giggling through the whole time. They were probably in their 50s or 60s. They were having the time of their life. They were talking to the screen. And then, like, twist after twist, they're like, ah! I made the same noise at one point. So like, in a way, it does feel kind of fantastical. But again, this is...
This is one of the nice things about, A, not having too much information as to what actually goes down so your imagination can run wild. And B, it's just like you aren't beholden to like trying to get everything absolutely right. You're trying to get at something that's sort of true or at least like has an essence. of like truth when it comes to what we imagine people within the Vatican and outside of there are wrestling.
And I don't know. There's something cool about that, I think. I also want to say, Edward Berger directed All Quiet on the Western Front a couple years. It was very heavily Oscar nominated. It won a bunch of Oscars. including for best score.
Volker Bertelmann, who also records under the name Hauschka, and I love Hauschka's music, but I did not love Volker Bertelmann's score for All Quiet on the Western Front, which I found so inception-y and just like, wah! You know, in this kind of... oppressive way and to me like this is a superb kind of old style, big sweeping cinematic movie score. And I really dug it. I have that in my notes, actually. I loved the sort of plucking strings that keep popping.
It's almost scored kind of like a folk horror movie. This could have been, you know, heredity. in a good way. The music adds this nice air of menace throughout. I think the length and the format really works for this too because I was thinking... There is an alternate reality where this was turned into an 8 to 10 part.
prestige TV series. No, thank you. And I would have hated it. It would have gone on and on and on. We would have read 10,000 words on like Vulture about like what is the ending going to be and where is this going? And I would have been bored to tears and really mad. But this is two hours. It flies by. There's not a wasted minute in it. And I'm like, in terms of return on investment.
Excellent return on investment. You're in and out. You have a great romp of a time and you didn't have to spend 10 hours with what, you know. as I've said, was not a great payoff to me. So then I'm glad it all kind of wrapped up because I'm like, you know what, it's fine. Two hours, great. Yeah, I think two hours is the right length for a whodunit.
I mean, this isn't a whodunit. It's a who's going to be Pope. Well, we want to know what you think about Conclave. Find us at Facebook.com slash PCHH and on Letterboxd at Letterboxd. Thanks so much for being here. Thank you. Thanks. And just a reminder that signing up for Pop Culture Happy Hour Plus is a great way to support our show and public radio, and you get to listen to all of our episodes sponsor-free.
So please go find out more at plus.npr.org slash happy hour or visit the link in our show notes. This episode was produced by Liz Metzger and edited by Jessica Reedy and Mike Katziff. Hello, Come In provides our theme music. Thank you for listening to Pop Culture Happy Hour from NPR. I'm Stephen Thompson, and we will see you all tomorrow. Imagine if you will, a show from NPR that's not like NPR. a show that focuses not on the important but the stupid.
which features stories about people smuggling animals in their pants and competent criminals in ridiculous science studies. And call it Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me because the good names were taken. Listen to NPR's Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me. Yes, that is what it is called wherever you get your podcasts.
When Malcolm Gladwell presented NPR's ThruLine podcast with a Peabody Award, he praised it for its historical and moral clarity. On ThruLine, we take you back in time to the origins of what's in the news, like presidential power. Thank you. These days, there is a lot of news. It can be hard to keep up with what it means for you, your family, and your community. Consider This from NPR is a podcast that helps you make sense of the news.
Six days a week, we bring you a deep dive on a story and provide the context, backstory, and analysis you need to understand our rapidly changing world. Listen to the Consider This podcast from NBC.