E64 - Is it animal cruelty to use live animals in transfiguration?
Episode description
Jem makes the bold claim that 'if you can't eat it, it's not real' and Reeah tries not to spoil Westworld Season 2. Both sisters get very confused about sentience in their journey to figure out what counts as animal cruelty, and how magic effect the ethics of its users.
UK Protection of Animals Act 1911: https://www.animallaw.info/statute/uk-cruelty-protection-animals-act-1911
Animal cruelty in transfiguration resources:
https://www.reddit.com/r/harrypotter/comments/83q7wc/the_ethics_of_transfiguring_living_animals/
https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/63289/what-are-transfigured-animals-essentially-made-of
https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/8574/how-alive-are-animals-created-by-spells
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Muggles%27_Guide_to_Harry_Potter/Magic/Transfiguration
A That's Not Canon Production. Find out more: https://thatsnotcanon.com/home
Logo by wingedcorgi. Find more of her art at wingedcorgi.tumblr.com
Contact us:
Website: https://thatsnotcanon.com/podcastnineandthreequarterspodcast
Email: nineandthreequarterspodcast@gmail.com
Tumblr: podcastnineandthreequarters.tumblr.com
Instagram: www.instagram.com/podcastnineandthreequarters/
Facebook: www.facebook.com/PodcastNineAndThreeQuarters/
Twitter: Jem - @Jem_JustJem and Reeah - @SmashMouthReeah
Subscribe to us on ITUNES, STITCHER, SPOTIFY, or your podcatcher of choice.
Find us on FACEBOOK,
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.