S1E1 - Failures in criminal investigations - Police liability - podcast episode cover

S1E1 - Failures in criminal investigations - Police liability

Aug 09, 201912 minSeason 1Ep. 1
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:
Metacast
Spotify
Youtube
RSS

Episode description

In 2018, the Supreme Court upheld landmark victories for two victims of the serial sex offender John Worboys against the Met Police, in the case known as “DSD and NBV”. The claimants alleged that Met officers had breached Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, by failing to investigate Worboys’ crimes properly and thereby failing to protect victims from “inhuman or degrading treatment” and hold the perpetrator to account. It was generally thought that police were “immune” from claims by individuals alleging “operational” failings in investigations. But the Supreme Court held that “obvious and significant shortcomings” can give rise to liability. When is an operational failing “obvious and significant”? How can investigators avoid such pitfalls? Solicitor Deborah Britstone and barrister Aaron Rathmell examine how this judgment affects the police.

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast
S1E1 - Failures in criminal investigations - Police liability | PLOD - Police Law On Demand podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast