Paul Murray Live | 2 March - podcast episode cover

Paul Murray Live | 2 March

Mar 02, 202551 minSeason 1Ep. 1685
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Major warnings loom as Tropical Cyclone Alfred edges closer to Queensland, the PM vows to open 50 new urgent care clinics, while the Coalition offers $3B to buy war fighters. Plus, the Treasurer warns Medicare is unsafe under Peter Dutton's control.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

Center. This is Paul Murray Live. Thank you Calem, thank you team. Yeah, this time last week it was Bateman's Bay, then we went to Vegas and now we're back in the man Cave. So unless I am certain, we stay here for the next little while. All right, looking forward to your company. Great to be back in the man Cave. Great to be back in Australia. So all eyes now at federal elections Sunday nights on. This program is one for the hard course. This is one where we get

right into the detail. We count the grains of sand on the beach and have any move in which direction. We'll get to that in a moment or two time. I'll tell you what the thinking was behind Donald Trump and the way that things went down with Zelenski. We're going to talk to something in the United States, just in case you are not quite across why Trump has the worldview that he does and the people who support

that particular worldview. And please the Prime minister trying to tell us that he's saving on cost of living because beer taxes won't go up for the next two years. They've gone a plenty in the past three years. Sixty five set of a bottle of Bundy rum is tax so feel free not to celebrate this particular one. The story that's going to be the dominant one in Australia outside of politics this week is going to be the cyclone that is going to be making its way to

North Queensland. Now, this is the tropical cyclone Alfred, and the latest that we can see when it comes to the radar is that it is going to be making its way. Probably major effects are going to be felt in and around Thursday at its worst, but who knows, there's plenty of that happens between now and then. To put this into some perspective about how many people are going to be effected by all of the effects of a tropical cyclone, the Turmble Times puts it at four million,

basically all Queenslanders who live anywhere near the coast. Here's the latest from our mates over It's Gone News weather.

Speaker 2

Tropical Cyclone Alfred generated some monster waves off the Queensland coast on Sunday, more than seven meters at Malula Bar. Tropical Cyclone Alfred is forecast to remain a Category one storm on Monday, remaining some three hundred kilometers off the Queensland coast.

Speaker 3

The latest from the Weather Bureau from Tuesday there is an increasing risk that Alfred will turn west and track back towards the southeast Queensland or northern New South Wales coast, with the potential for it to make landfall at a category up to Category two system on Thursday. A tropical cyclone may be issued as early as Monday.

Speaker 1

We'll give you all the updates twenty four to seven on the Weather Channel and make sure that you make sky news dot com that are you your homepage. So the election has not been called this weekend, so we wait another week. The Prime Minister, among other things, was the Mardi Gras last night in Sydney and the speculation now turns to when will he call the election.

Speaker 4

Going to an election in May is very much a live option, despite speculation to the contrary. The dates being considered that April twelve, May three and May ten. I understand the decision has been made not to go with the last possible election date that the PM could call it May seventeen.

Speaker 1

But the reality for us is that in an election year means all hands on deck, which is why we're here tonight and we will be right at the front of things between now and when the election is called. Full coverage of course throughout the days and here in primetime, and then we hit our absolute straps. Between now and election day, pub tests planned all over the country, as well as plenty of other special features, including this Sunday night. I want this to be a destination for you for

a reset. Each and every week. We might just talk about the polls. We'll talk about the tactics. We'll talk about what they are they aren't doing, and what we might be hearing behind the scenes. Now, as we know, the Prime Minister finds a way to announce half a billion dollars a day. He's spending is now in the tens of billions of dollars for some reason, the press gallery I never asked the Liberal Party where the money is going to come from. The question should be being

asked to the Prime Minister as well. But we all know that the benefit of the doubt for the establishment media is to keep the establishment firmly in place.

Speaker 5

The great benefit of these meeting care urgent care clinics is taking pressure of cost of living for families. They're also meaning that people can get the care they need when they need it, and all they need is the Settle Green card here. All they need is their Medicare card, not their credit card.

Speaker 1

Of course, this is a debate about what. This is a debate against which Remember the opposition just last week said that they would match dollar for dollar and an extra five hundred million dollars when it comes to Medicare. So while the Prime Minister wants to turn that card into a prop they both agree on not just keeping

the current system but improving it. For the Opposition, they chose national defense as their focus today, with a plan to spend billions of dollars on more planes that theoretically would be able to go and find out what Chinese warships are doing. But of course it's not as exciting for the Prime Minister because he's got to stand in front of the brand that Bob Hawk launched, because you know, he's the new Hawky.

Speaker 6

Look, we're committing to an additional three billion dollars of expenditure today to secure that fourth squadron, and we will negotiate the costs of not only the aircraft but all the ancillary capabilities that need to support it once we're in government.

Speaker 1

Now it is no surprise that every poll for the past few years has told us the number one issue in the country is cost of living. The Prime Minister wants to pretend that they are doing something about it, but they of course promised that they would make everything better three years ago. Instead, we all know it's worse. Take your pick, be it the stuff you buy at the shop, the insurance that you have, or how much you are paying off in the tens of thousands of

dollars extra on your home loan. But don't know, let's all talk about medicare as if that is the single biggest concern for Australians. It is about changing the subject one from where the government is about to get its backside handed to it to the one that they think they're able to make this election about. It is, of course not up to the government what the election is about. It's you, and it's also up to the Opposition to pull the subject back to where the majority of Australians are.

I repeat every time the Prime Minister talks about medicare you should remember that the federal opposition has promised to not just match eight point five billion dollars, but are going to spend nine billion dollars. If you doubt, you can feel free to go to the Liberal Party website. You can read the announcement yourself. It is there, I promise it is there. Of all the times for it not to work. But you get my point. That is

the plan, that is the promise. Remember, legislation was passed back in the Morrison government about defending and making sure Medicare was in place, So all of this pretending that Medicare is under threat is literally made up. It is an attempt to change the subject. And most of the media will follow on. I'll get to the way the media treated the excise on alcohol discussion in a moment

or two time. But Jim Charmers is one who was, of course trying to make the most of the talking points because his hope would be that the Albanezi government goes from a majority to a minority and then he would humably at some point take the advice of people like nasty Nicky Sava and become the Prime Minister in the next three years. So he sings off the song sheet that wheneveryone asked a question, somehow make it about Peter Dutton and Mediicare.

Speaker 7

Medicare is not safe in Peter Dutton's hands. Medicare is not safe from the guy who, when he was Health Minister, tried to destroy universal Medicare.

Speaker 1

It didn't happen, did not happen, did not attempt to happen. Remember, the entire basis of their campaign is a Frankenstein little bit of tape where they literally cut words out of it and make up a sentence about support or lack thereof in the case that they're trying to build about Peter Dutton. But the Redbridge Pole, which is a rolling pole of the marginal seats, does give us an idea

about what is working and what is not. Now, after a full week of the opposition not getting out there aggressively enough to say we're not just matching with are doing better, there has been a little change in the

priority of Australians when it comes to this upcoming election. Now, the cost of living is still the absolute number one issue at eighty two percent, but you can see that lots of other issues have fallen away, but healthcare, housing, climate change, and crime and responsibility and public safety have all gone up. So the attempt to change the subject is starting to work on the margins which brings me to some tough love for the people who I win

this election. Now Peter Dutton and his team, of course, are trying to put together not just an alternative view for where they want to take the country, but they also have to prosecute and finish the case about how bad this government is. I think it's simple because remember they promised everything would be better. Everything got worse. So now the government turns around and says, oh on, it

will be really worse under the other guy. Now, yes, we're hiring somebody for the next three years, but you must pass judgment on a government for the previous three years. Has to say. The government's doing all it can to make Peter Dutton the issue because they think they'll be able to do to Peter Dutton what's got Morrison was able to do to Bill Shorten.

Speaker 7

Peter Dutton is such a reckless and risky proposition is because when he sees the vision in our society, he tries to exacerbate it and make it worse for political purposes.

Speaker 1

What chares did he buy? How much did he buy them for?

Speaker 8

Did he have access to privileged, confidential, informational people who.

Speaker 9

Did knows in his heart and doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

Speaker 7

Peter Duttman the Liberals who would make people worse off and take Australia backwards peed.

Speaker 9

Dunton and his colleagues had a fair bit to say about the Prime Minister buying one house last year. Well see what he's got to say about the twenty six homes that he's bought and sold over the last couple of decades, some of which he hasn't.

Speaker 1

Declared these people. The problem with the Prime Minister buying a four point something million dollar house in the middle of a cost of living crisis is fairly obvious about

why Australians had a problem with it. This is a guy who's already setting himself up for a retirement because ultimately it doesn't matter what happens to him at the election, because he will still retire on hundreds of thousands of dollars, not to mention his own property portfolio, which brings him a income on top of his Prime minister or salary of six hundred thousand dollars a year of one hundred and forty thousand dollars. Now it's okay to be a

property investor in Australia. But they have tried any and everything to again change the subject and create some sort of dodginess around Peter Dutton. Philip Couri writes about this interestingly today in the Weekend Financial Review. None of this pesky detail seems to matter, that being that the stories are all garbage. The object here is to fill in the blanks for voters who have well formed views of Albanzi, whether they be ill or otherwise, but are just starting

to get their heads around Peter Dutton. Remember, of course, you make it, Jos to break up with the government before you turn your attention to who you want to spend the next three years with. The spin from Labor is that Dutton falsely affected a working class chic and share by buyap and property portfolio exposes that he is

not really that person. But of course the Prime Minister is able to pretend that he's still the boy from the Housing Commission joint, when of course he is now a man with millions of dollars of assets to his name via property, and of course has received massive pay rises and of course gets free upgrades even on the travel, which he is not doing for the taxpayer. We all

know which one is the actual silvertar. We know which one is actually the social climb, and we already know which one is actually the fraud in terms of the personality that they have put forward in front of the Australian people. But the simple question is this, when does the Liberal Party fight back? When does the Liberal Party

start to run hard at Albanesi? Where are the posters that are telling people in each and every electorate how much mortgage repayments in that electorate have gone up under Albanesi. Where is the social media that is all day every day hammering home points. Where is the major speeches. The reality is is that this is a very beatable government. The polls show that there are plenty of Australians who have had it up to here with the government. They do not buy that they believe that the country is

headed in the right direction. Instead it's in the opposite direction. And the reality is that while Dunton is keen to say that he's not going to be Aussie Trump because the effect on Teal seats and moderate voters would of course set their hair on fire, the reality is that in terms of some of the polls, albo Is Ossie, Joe Biden just thirty four percent of Australians believe this

government deserves to be re elected. Now that does mean that people from the far left and those people in the center and on the center right are all of one view, which is this mob has to go. Why because they promised a better world, they delivered a worse one.

And now they turn around and expect credit for delivering two little too late tax cuts, giving power bill relief in exchange for actually changing the two hundred and seventy five dollars that was promised, not to mention a disgraceful reality that under the boy from Housing Commission, three million people are this close to homelessness and three and a bit million people don't know where all of their meals

will come from this week. Apart from the personality, apart from the decision making, it is not up to the media to define Anthony Abernezi. It is up to his political opponents. And I'm sure that there is some wonderful plan that will kick in the day that an election is called. But the whole game of the Prime Minister not calling an election or hinting that one might be called this weekend for nothing to happen, is that if the Liberal Party is holding its fire for the start

of an election campaign. They give the Prime Minister days and days which become weeks and weeks to announce policies that he has no money for, or to invent scare campaigns that have no basis in fact, or to release the dirt files on the opposition. Now, again, I'm not a participant in Australian politics. I am an observer of it.

But if this government is going to go from a majority to a minority, to potentially the Liberal Party being able to fight from quite a position back to getting anywhere near a minority, they have to start fighting harder, more visibly. They have to be releasing more ads, they have to have a sharper message when it comes to social media, and they cannot afford to take a single

day off in terms of the fight. Because Australians are ready for a change, but we need to make sure that the people who are trying to effect that change are as hungry as those of us that would like to see it. Now, I know there are smart people that are hard working that will be very pissed off that I'm even saying what I am saying, But what I am saying is that I saw what Trump was able to do to Biden. He did it not over thirty three days, but he did it over thirty three weeks.

He did it over essentially the best part of two of the four years of that presidency. And the Opposition has made a case where according to some polls, there are plenty of people that are willing to make a change, but don't wait for the election to be called. Imagine it has already been called, not just when it comes to the big ideas, but the big attacks. Because this Prime Minister has a glass jaw, he will not be

able to keep his emotions in check. He still thinks that he's fighting against Scott Morrison, and he's the Opposition leader who has no responsibility so can continue to tell you that everything will be better despite the fact that

on his watch everything got worse. Not to mention his response when it comes to our national security and China circumnavigating Australia with warships, it's unacceptable, it is not okay, and it is time to go full bore, full bore, release every and anything you have, and do it every single day. If it's thirty three, if it's forty three

or it's fifty three days. It does not matter because the remember the reality in Australia is that more than half of all people will vote two weeks before election day. Australians vote early, which means the election camp, if it is to officially start in two weeks, well, the full

thirty three days starts now. So let's get to some of the latest polling, which is around tonight what we will get into in chapter and verse with our great team, and we'll get to them in a moment or two's time, of course, cos Samaris from red Bridge and the great Michael Kroger, who may well have you a little pushback or agree with what I've had to say here. So interestingly, a couple of weeks ago the Coalition was in striking distance of twenty seats. Now that would actually take them

very close to, if not a majority government. Well now two weeks later, Labour seems to have clawed back some ground. What was fifty one forty nine in some seats has now flipped the other way to Labour fifty one forty nine. And the scenario here is worth paying attention to about why the Libs must fight and fight hard now Labour's primary vote up one point, Liberal National down to Greens hold the line, others they are up. In terms of two party preferred, there has been one and a half

points that have changed in just two weeks now. Whether that is the interest rates or not, and there's some polling evidence suggests it is not, or it's the Meny scare campaign or anything else. Labour would love the idea of going into an election at fifty zo point five to forty nine point five because most likely the deals wouldn't be moving and not enough seats would move for the Liberal Party to get even close when it comes to a minority government. Again, let's get into this here.

The Reserve Bank, does it make you more likely or less likely or no difference? Sixty five percent of people say the interest rate change no difference. The percentage of workers who think that the country is headed in the right direction. Two weeks ago, that was twenty seven. It's now up to thirty three. Wrong direction fifty five now down to fifty percent. Let's get into the conversation right now with Cos Samaras from red Bridge. They're the ones

who put it all together. Michael Kroger, a legend of Liberal party politics, lots to get to and what we call the state of the race each and every Sunday night one for the hard course. Lads, love you to see you both, all right, cause looking at this has been a change, and whether the change is just a little bit here and a little bit there. It goes from the Libs threatening minority government to now the conversation simply being about whether labor how deep it goes into

minority government. Big change in two weeks. Yep.

Speaker 10

One team's on the field and the other one's in the locker room. And it's been in the locker room for the last three weeks, and whilst watching the other team, being the labor team, kick the number of goals one after the other, and they've been building momentum. It's the interest rate cut, it's the Waler bailout, it's Medicare, it's

now clinics. And of course you know the coalition today rebounds from that by promising more jets, which is fine, but that's not what we're picking up in our research, right, And so it does appear that the coalition is he's very flat footed and he's allowing Albanisi to really build some significant momentum here.

Speaker 1

Yeah, Michael, this is what I'm noticing here, right, you know what outcome I want. But the reality is I think that the Libs are waiting for a date rather than get on with it now fight it like it's the last week of the campaign. Now. Yeah.

Speaker 11

Well, you know I respect cousin Tony Barry very much, indeed, and I'm always very inot to see this stuff, which is usually very accurate. So how do I explain what's happened? I think it's probably a dead cat bounce off the back of the interest rate cuss which everyone was waiting for. And don't forget. You know, amongst most people, costs are living is the only issue. So anything that helps is gridded with great joy. Whether that momentum can be continued,

I don't think so, But I think you're right. Albanize's certainly out of the blocks. There's a long way to go, though, and he's already run out of other people's money. He seems to be spending billions every week. There's a point at which people say, hey, mate, this fast has got to end. I mean, he is partly adopting the Daniel Andrews strategy of Aden and which is bug of the public.

Just spend, spend, spend, promise them everything, roads, bridges, rail hospital, just promise everything, get over line and leave the debt to the next government two or three terms down the track. That's what Albo's doing at the minute. That's your strategy. It's worked in the past. Whether it works for federally, I very much doubt it because people pay a lot more attention to federal budgets they do state budgets, and I don't think the dead cat bounce will last.

Speaker 1

All right. This is again to hammer home my point here. Prime Minister made an announcement which on the face of it you've got to support because it's going to be no increase in beer taxes for the next two years. This is how the media followed this. Now, by the way, the Labor Party obviously more than happy to try to cloak itself in the past of Robert James Lee Hawk right, And there is a particular beer which has his face on it. It operates in and around the Prime Minister's

electric which means it's a lovely little photo opportunity. It's a chance for a little bit of a nostalgia hit, which means the media going to go along and follow. He pours a beer, make the statement that we are going to freeze beer taxes for the next two years. The media, the media who should know better, do no better. This is how they reacted to it. Michael, you would love this coverage for a liberal candidate roll tape.

Speaker 2

Have a look in an early gift to himself and voters, Anthony Albanesi announcing a temporary pause to the draft beer excise.

Speaker 6

Anthony Albanzi announces he'll freeze the tax on draft beer for two years from August.

Speaker 1

I'll tell you why this pieced me off, because this bloke, in the three years he's been Prime Minister, has put up beer taxes at least twice. The Brewers Association, this is from their website, says that the record beert tax increase from the first of August twenty two fest to February twenty three is damaging Australian pubs and clubs. The increase in be attacks on February one, twenty three meant that beer taxes beer prices have gone up by eight

cents in the past six months. Australians are now paying twenty dollars for every slab of beer and about ninety cents for every pint. What I find amazing, Michael, is that the bloke who has put the taxes up on beer every chance he's got in this term gets credit from the media for promising not to do it in the next term. Now that's because the media are more than happy as always to give the benefit of the government. But where the hell was the opposition making the point

that I am making on television on Sunday night. Where were they pushing back because the fact that he got that rails run because look at the pictures of Hawkey is a disgrace.

Speaker 11

Well, I don't know whether where I was out for dinner, so I mister Paul might have been there, but I'm not sure what they said, A bit like I saw missing your trip to Vegas. By the way, we're still we're still ready to go, mate, but I think the trip's over look. This is this is this is a one day story. Okay, this is not anything substantial for election. Elections tend to run on themes. Right, you can win one day's press.

Speaker 1

You know.

Speaker 11

The one thing a politics you can never do is is you know, think that if I win the day's press. I won the war, and I've seen so many politicians believe that there are thematics to elections. Right, what is the thematic about this election?

Speaker 1

Mate?

Speaker 11

The thematic is simply this. I boil it down to this simple question. Do I think a majority of Australians want the next three years to be like the last three years? Right? That is the only question that matters.

Speaker 1

The beer tax? Mate?

Speaker 11

Is is you know like yesterday's newspapers. That's the only thing that matters made And I.

Speaker 1

Agree, but you know, sorry, go on, no, no, I agree, because my point on this is is that when you add a day on top of a day, on top of a day on top of a day, then it means you get to turn around and say, hey, look at all of this stuff. Right, The immediate response should be with such aggression to cool out the bs, to say, now he wants a present when he's made your pint.

It's more expensive. Did you know that every time you buy a slaber beer, twenty dollars of that is tax for elbow And that has to be the arm wrestle of each and every day. And because that's my point, which is that when you're going to sit and have focus groups in a week's time, and the Prime Minister says, now, even though the detail of a tax cut was fourteen dollars a week for people in and around forty thousand dollars right, even though the reality of the power price

thing is it's twenty five dollars a month. Even though the reality of the beer situation is that we're talking about a few cents into the future. He's going to point to it as a list of things when the opposition doesn't have a list of anything. That's my point.

Speaker 10

The absence a lot of an alternity absolutely. I mean having said that, I mean the promise to freeze the tax now, the medicare announcement. Now, when we talked about is they know why there's an election, so you know, they are very cynical and they think that this is all about just trying to get their vote. What's missing is going to your broader point, and that is what's missing is an alternative. He's done offering an alternative. Is

Dutton's plan going to be different? Is Dutton's plan going to offer a different world compared to the last three years the people have experienced And so far we're hearing crickets, right, So all he has to do is stump up a plan and particularly run the economy. And if it does that, maybe some of these stunts won't work. But if in absence of that, it'll just keep running along. And yes, you'll keep building a momentum. But it's really up to Peter Dunton and actually stop it.

Speaker 1

As I say, we are observers, not participants, are right, And you know advice is free and all the rest of it, and it's worth what they pay for. But you know, as a passionate observer, you can see when momentum starts to move and it is very hard to flip it back. All right, Yes, this is giant percentage of people who won't pay attention. All the rest of

it is eventually when the zeitgeist changes. And what a week is a long time in politics, imagine what you know at least four or five six weeks might end up being so because about when you have a chat to people about these promises and multi billion this and that. One of the reasons why they might want to avoid a budget is because they don't want to show the numbers.

The reality of many of these things is as soon as I hear the word investment, it's code for off budget money, which is how they hired the actual spending here. But to Michael's point, which was, you know, it proved electorally successful in the short term, but in the long term it becomes disastrous. Victoria is now the worst place for the Labor Party around the country. You know, a huge difference in two party preferred they're compared to anywhere else.

So once, you know, once the bill comes in, people have the Harry hits. But until the bill comes in, you know, they might they might think somehow this has all been pre budgeted for. Does anyone in your focus groups say where is the money coming from? Because it feels like that's an essential question that Labor wants to ask of the opposition, but somebody should be asking it of the government.

Speaker 10

Yeah, look in the two big states, it's is still a very sensitive point and it wasn't a few years ago. So, you know, going back to Michael's point about a strategy in twenty eighteen in Victoria from the Andres government. At that time, you know, the economy was bubbling along really well and people work. We didn't have much personal pain when it came to their own economic situation because of now the inflationary crisis and everything that everyone's going through.

They are acutely aware of what happens when governments run out of money, particularly Victoria. So in Victoria, yes, our pole does indicate a tightening of the race, but based on the numbers that we're seeing in Victoria, labor's still heading for an absolute wipeout in that state at a

better level. That's mainly because of the state budget, but also obviously people have been a lot more a tune in that state to what happens when you're not careful with the budget, and so hence I think some of the promises that are going on right now at a federal level won't fix the problem labor has in Victoria, which is up to six seats.

Speaker 1

Well, and what about the scenario with the Victorian government, Michael this weekend. They're big and bold and brilliant. Idea is to let school age children where ankle monitors, because they may well have been found guilty of crimes, will be going through the justice system, and not to go

to a special school for the naughty kids. No, no, they sit in the same classroom as your kids, all right, So I know that the album Easy System would basically like the Victorian government to just go storm, go on holidays, go for a bender in Vegas. I didn't go for a bender in Vegas, but you get the point, right, bugger off for forty four days because seriously, to see that announcement and again it adds to bugger this Victoria labor.

And I get what the posters will be, you know, a black and white foddo with Albo and Allen and send the message about I get all of that. But let's have a look at some of these seats, particularly in around Victoria, because those numbers what James Campbell also focused in on today when he was writing about this poll, which is Aston Chisholm McEwen, Bruce, Dunkley, Hawk, Karngamite and Holt the first of that group. If we can show them, guys are the ones that are on track to lose.

Be great to see Julian Hill bye bye. But let's see and let's have a look here at some of those other ones. But that's the picture in Victoria. So what are you seeing there and what's missing off the list there? Michael?

Speaker 11

So we won nine seats from Lavery nineteen ninety. I'm just looking at that list the nineteen ninety we won Aston, we won Chisholm, we won McEwen. I think we won Dunky. We also warn Coronella, Ballarat, Bendy Go and a couple of others as well. So it's possible there's another two or three there in addition to those five that they've got there. So what's happening in Victoria is this The public here have woken up to debt A right causes

right in eighteen it wasn't such a big deal. But Andrews spent one hundred billion defeating Matthew Guy in eighteen and twenty two, and people thought, this guy Andrews is a strong leader. Money's free, it's no problem. We canna have a hospital. We're going to have everything here in Victoria. That's what Andrews said. Fast forward to twenty twenty four, people are now saying hang on. When Dennis Napthlin left office in two thousand and forty, in the last Liberal premiere,

state debt was twenty billion, two zero. Soon it's going to be one hundred and eighty eight billion. So people who have now worked out hang on labor basically bankrupt us in Victoria. I mean this just Cinder Allen and Daniel Andrews have bankrotered us to the point where Ja Cindra Allen made our premier. Yere, I don't know who you've caught up with this. She's going to start our own doze here in Victoria. She's sacking three thousand public

servants because the public service is too big. She's got to save money, so she's sacking three thousand public servants. So effectively, what's happening in the foundation of Albanesi's problems Victoria is the massive unpopularity of the state labor government, very similar to nineteen ninety when a massively unpopular labor government.

Cane Kern, who'd also bankrubb to Victoria and Jeff Kennett now on Stockdale had to fix it up very similar circumstances, and so you know there was a five point one percent swing against labor in the nineteen ninety election. Here in Victoria, I noticed cousin Tony Barry stats have got an eight and a half. Helloloja, I hope you're right there, mate, because they could catapult Dutton into the prime minister ship on his own eight and a half percent though that

is a very big number in a general election. That's a massive number in a general election, so I hope, but yeah, Dutton can do very well here.

Speaker 1

Now again the joy by the way of this between now and the election, and may he delayed as long as long as he wants two segments of stair the race on Sunday nights. I can't get enough. We're counting the grains of sand. It's one for the super nerds, it's one for the political nutbags like myself, and we are going to go in hard with these fellows all the way the next way through, all right. So I want to talk about, say the set of Dunkley as an example of what is being counted as it may be,

but what the reality of what would have to change. Now. I know there's a difference between a general election number and a by election number, but the margin of difference between on two party preferred the Liberal Party and the Labor Party in the seat of Dunkley is nine hundred

and twenty six people. So because when you are looking at the stats and the numbers inside the numbers, inside the numbers, when we see a one point here or a one point there, when you've got something like five thousand people who need to change their mind in any one seat. Is one point enough for that? I know it's different in different states. I know that. You know the electric size is very different in Tasmania to Victoria.

But if you want to start to at home be an amateur sort of predictor here if a one point change, would that be enough for nine hundred and twenty six votes to change?

Speaker 10

Yeah? See Melbourne and it is Melbourne, you know this is where all the action is.

Speaker 1

Going to be.

Speaker 10

Malve's a really peculiar place when it comes to an electric politics these days. So in the West Labor could lose a stack of oats and it will just spray to minor parties like I did at the wear of your by election, and there will be some increase in the Coalish and primary, but it won't be enough. Yes, However, in a seat like Dunkley in the southeastern parts of Melbourne, those people had a longer history of owning Liberal either their parents did or they have sometimes in their past.

Speaker 1

Good point, so.

Speaker 10

The Liberal primary the ceiling is much higher, or the floor is much much higher, so the Labour's primary can collapse and spray to minor parties and the Colason you can only get five percent. That's enough, that's.

Speaker 1

All you need.

Speaker 10

So you know we're seeing swings of ten percent on primary vote in some of these southeastern seats at the moment. Now you know, if you transport that over to the West of Melbourne, that could still.

Speaker 1

Be okay for labor.

Speaker 10

But in the East, the seat like Dunky, it's curtains. So that's the fundamentally that is the problem, and that is that the coalition will be in the forties. Labor will be in the thirties, probably in the low thirties in some of these seats unless something drastically happens out of there the course of the camp well.

Speaker 1

Also hence why my little idea, my little campaign idea, right, which is the posters not just of the face and the name, but in the seat of Dunky, mortgages cost x thousand dollars under elbow. Why does that matter? Because twenty nine percent of people own a house, twenty six percent rental house and above national average. Forty one percent of people have a mortgage. Rest of Victoria thirty six,

rest of the country thirty five. That's why it matters, all right, not just cost of a living, but that mortgage thing matters. Okay, pay attention. We're counting the grains of the sand and we're currently up to four five and twenty five in just this one little handful. All right, quick break back with more here on Paul Murray life. Rosa. Marris is the man behind the Red Bridge organization. They know, just do polling. They're doing rolling polling, they're doing also

focus group. He's got plenty of insights and lots of data. You know, we love the data. That is the brick in the wall that we build here. The opinion is the mortar. The man to help us with all of that is a great Michael Kroger, who's coming to Vegas when we go next year for as long as I

possibly can. All Right, so be couse. I haven't read much about this, but I'm going to ask about the teals because Michael is as always on the edge of his seat to see if there's any indication anywhere of a bit of a change, because if there is, then that's a couple more For the Libs. What if anything, are you seeing at this moment in the second phase of your polling, and it will happen every couple of weeks and then every week during the campaign about Teals.

Speaker 10

Yeah, this is an interesting question, right because we're focusing on the Labor Coalition contest, but there's going to be another contest. There's going to have an enormous impact on who gets to about seventy to seventy one seats because at the moment both majors are not getting seventy six and obviously this is the largest group of the Teal

independence so where could they possibly blulue seats? So we're looking at a seat like Curtain in Perth, and we're looking at a seat like Goldstein in Melbourne where the numbers are very tight, and that's where if there's something going to happen and the the political order will flip, it will be there. However, in seat like Bradfield in Sydney, Tills could pick up a seat. I agree, right, And the don't don't let's not ignore the federal seat of Monash.

The Russell Broadbands running it is an independent and there's a Till independent run there as well, and they're exchanging preferences. So it's going to be an interesting contest because it's so there's a there's another war going on, and it's on the flanks, and that's that's for the liberal versus independent contest. But obviously we can talk about the green side of it.

Speaker 1

Too well and again, and there's there's deeper data, deeper information that's not been published. I'm not going to make reference to it with any greater specificity than this. In six of the twenty seats that you are following, the other vote is above twenty percent. In some of them it's twenty five twenty six. That is extraordinary that a quarter of the electorate. Now other does mean and you've already got Greens, so this is outside of labor liberal Greens.

And again in places like Queensland that might be one nation, we know that they're running nationally in things like Newspole it's something like nine percent, right, so that they're going to be a factor the UAP or Trumpet's thing. Will all see what happens that other number. When you I mean again, you can't, you're not going to bend the numbers we try to understand them. Does other also mean undecided?

When we are talking about looking at some poles at the moment that clearly there's not going to be a twenty five percent vote in places that are very traditionally red or blue.

Speaker 10

Look, it could be right, And so I mean at the last S election we had five point two million people who didn't vote for the majors. But what we're picking up is an incredibly soft vote, incredibly sizable soft vote, particularly within Labour's base. So though the polls are our y, the primary vote for particular Labor, but also to a lesser extent the coalition is extremely soft. There's a lot of voters that are just looking for something else to do with their vote. And this is where I think

the election campaign could actually impact. You know, normally I would go to the down the doctrine of running a campaign for three months, because you know, you can't change the result in thirty days. But in this instance, there's so many people up for grabs that I think you can so he That's why I think the next thirty odd days or whenever that is, are going to be actually absolutely critical for the result.

Speaker 1

Yeah, so let's talk about that. If you're running the machine, if you're trying to trying to tighten up your voters, Michael, how does a party do that?

Speaker 11

So Mate, the messages have to be strong, and the leadership has to be strong, and the negative camp painting has to be strong. You know, occasionally there will be a time where you float into government because the previous government has expired, right, their time has expired, like like the Howard government did in two thousand and seven, Like you know, the South Australian government did after sixteen years, you know, you know, in the same hawk keeping expired

in nineteen ninety six, et cetera, et cetera. So what you don't want, though, at a federal level is after one term to be thinking that way, because that's not what happens. You have to will people to vote for you, and you have to get them to vote against the other mob. Now, I think so much damage has been done by Alban easy to himself into his government with Wong and Bowen and all these characters, and I think you've got a weak treasurer. I think I think they're

very vulnerable from their own performance. I mean, no one is saying it's been a great labor government. I mean, no one says that, right, No one says this is a hawk style government of you know, vote for them on the other and what does the opposition have to do. The opposition has to give people a very strong alternative. Now,

Dutton has been very good. The reason Dunton gets a lot of plaudits and the reason he's in front of the polls is unlike a lot of politicians, he's actually had the courage to come out and say, I think we should have nuclear power in Australia. Very courageous policy. He's right, but god, it takes a lot of courage. I mean, if I think back to the Liberal leaders and others who've not been that strong on this issue. Very strong in immigration, right, very strong on Israel, very

strong in government spending right. Dutton has given. Dunton has given a definition of who he is right and people know his background as a policemen, etc. So the answer to your question is, going forward to the election, more very strong messages on issues that are of relevance to people. So, you know, whilst you say Labor's had momentum over the last week, and I think that's fair to say, I'm absolutely certain that there's a lot of firepower in Dutton's locker.

The other thing, just to what cause was saying, sorry, sorry, Paul Kuyong Tu, you on the Teal sets Will were fascinating. So three years ago in twenty twenty two, the two compelling reasons were three reasons where it wasn't the Morrison government we'd been there for nine years blah blah blah, but global warming and anti corruption where the big issues the Teals ran on. Now the Anti Corruption Commission is in, that's a zero issue. Global warming is now the major

issue for in causes. Servage was fascinating today in the paper. Global warming is now only the main priority for seven percent of the electric So I'm wondering how that's going to affect the Teal vote. I mean, if you've got labor vote down the three big issues the Teal ran on, Morrison's gone any Corruption's not an issue, global warming seven percent? Doesn't that mean the Teals are in trouble in some of these seats. Seriously?

Speaker 1

Sure, because I'm imagining part of it is is the difference in the genders, right, Okay, so the Libs are leading by such a margin with the blokes. The Left is leading with women. This of course was the whole Harris thing. Right, there are more women voting than men, so therefore we're going to win well guess what greater break of men than Trump wins.

Speaker 10

Yeah, and there's still a lot of double heaters, as we would like to define him in his country, a lot of people who just don't like the majors anymore. They're different inner parts of our art cities. So progressive minded individuals are opting for those till independents, but now the suburbs opting for minor partners and in increasing numbers. You know, there isn't a Trump personality present in this country.

One that, you know, is something that I think some of these Australians will vote for, and hence they a lot of these voters are now just shopping around looking for an alternative, can't quite find one. Some which just end up voting for the majors because that's all they think they can do. Some will vote for independence and minor parties. So the appetite, therefroent for something other than

the Coles and wo Worths of politics is huge. It's just that there isn't really allowed a stage for any any of that sort of hunger, so to speak.

Speaker 1

Good stuff, Thank you labs. I love our chats and especially the longer versions. By the way, Michael, don't worry. I think that their momentum is just an idling car rolling slightly forward, but I want them going backwards. All right, all right, thank you lads, We'll do it, will so you could get next week, all right, in a moment's time. Speaking of Trump, for those that need a little reset, why does Trump have the problem with Zelensky? Why doesn't

he want to spend more money in Ukraine? I'll explain why next, all right. What you may have noticed a couple of stories over the weekend about a little meeting between the presidents of the United States and Ukraine didn't end well, so much so that the President of Ukraine was booted out of the White House, ended up leaving the country, and as we speak, is in the arms of the UK. It looks like Trump will move on with basically completely moving away from all support that's previously

been there for Ukraine. Kelly Jane Torrens is an excellent writer with The New York Post. She's across all of this, all the ups, all the downs. Her newspaper has had a Ukrainian flag on its front page at many times. So, Kelly Jane, how do you feel about what we all saw with our own eyes about a day ago.

Speaker 12

I'm pretty depressed, Paul. I have to be honest with you, and I say that as someone who is a huge supporter of Ukraine. You know, I went there in the summer of twenty twenty three when it was starting its counter offensive against Russia, and I went there on my own, actually I used vacation time, and of course wrote about it. But it's an issue near and dear to my heart, and it's depressing to me how much damage was done to Ukraine in less than an hour with this meeting.

Speaker 1

Who do you think is most of fault in the meeting? I know that the pressure that was building up all the rest of it, but it felt like Zelensky had been frustrated for some time. He decided to speak in a certain series of metaphors. Trump then didn't like the metaphors, and then Vance kind of takes it to the next level. You're gambling with world War three. You're gambling with World War three, and what you're doing is very disrespectful to

the country this country. Have you said thank you once a lot of times?

Speaker 8

No, you said you went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October.

Speaker 1

Offer some words of appreciation for the United.

Speaker 8

States of America and the president who's trying to save your country. If you didn't have our military equipment, if you didn't have our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks.

Speaker 1

In three days, I heard it from Putin in three days. Who do you blind, if anyone for what happened?

Speaker 12

Well, as you say, Paul Zelenski was clearly irritated, and he wore those emotions on his sleeve. It was incredible to see how obviously angry and irritated he was, and he wasn't making any attempt to hide those emotions. I mean, this was a high stakes meeting. I can't say I'm you know, was very impressed with some of the things jd. Vance said, and I don't think he acted as well as he could have. And I think Donald Trump should have really done all the talking. But I do place

the blame unfortunately. I hate to say this, but it's en Volodimir Zelenski. He this meeting was crucial to him, and he'd been coached I am told by a number of Republicans in Congress and and other friends of Ukraine on the on the right how to handle this meeting, and what he needed to do was smile, say thank you, shake hands, and sign this mineral deal. Uh, it was not really that much of a of a stretch. You know, I get it in the moment, you get angry, you

get irritated. Yeah, but you know what you're You're the president of a country at war. You need to hold on to those emotions inside and outwardly do what's best for your country and really for the world in holding Russia at bay. And he utterly failed. And everyone I know, you know, it's just so disappointed with what happened. You know, even people I know that placed the blame on Vans or Trump, even they admit Zelenski did not handle himself well at all.

Speaker 1

Yeah. Absolutely. Now, now I've been talking about this all night. That part of our conversation here was to explain how we got here from the Trump and Magaworld point of view. Right, we know that Russia invaded Ukraine, but also we know that there are people who were very frustrated about tens of and hundreds of billions of dollars that Biden was giving to a country that, prior to being invaded by Russia, was considered to be a fairly corrupt place, right, the

accounting in and around that money. But also it feels to me like some of the feeling about Trump and Magaworld has nothing to do with Ukraine and it connects back to trillions of dollars in Iraq and trillions of dollars in Afghanistan. Can you, again help explain to people watching in little old Australia, how did we get to the point where the American president feels how he feels about a country that's been invited by what I lost time checked was an enemy Russia.

Speaker 12

Well that's a great insight, Paul, and it really does help to explain a lot about how Americans, and especially a lot of those who voted for President Trump, and again that was more than half the country, the half of voters feel because, yeah, we've had so many long and really disastrous wars in the last decades here in America,

and you know, utter failures. You spent all that money and again blood and treasure, blood meeting the you know, Americans died in Iraq, in Afghanistan, and you know what happened was not what was supposed to happen those countries clearly, And you look at Afghanistan. What a real disaster that has been for the people there as well, not just for the Americans who died. And you know, there's a phrase he used here a lot forever wars, and so you know, the American people are tired of war and

they're skeptical of spending their money for foreign wars. And I do also put some of the blame on President Biden. He did not sell aid to Ukraine well at all. He really didn't. He didn't. You know, this really deserved

a prime time address from the president. Listen. You know, one of our allies has been attacked by one of our biggest enemies, and this is why we need to help them, and this is what we're going to do, and this is how and this is again something by never never spoke to, how to help Ukraine actually achieve victory and not just a stalemate, which is sort of the situation we've ended up. It's really terrible, you know.

And my paper New York Post, you know, begged by many times please sell this war, our support to Ukraine and this better than he did. He did not. And so you've got all of those things coming together. And of course, you know President Trump was just elected, and he did say he was going to end this now. He did not end it on day one as he promised, but of course even he, I'm sure knew that was an impossible feat. He's got to bring these parties together,

he's got to get deals made, negotiations done. But he did make a promise to end it quickly, and the American people voted for that. And so this is all all in the background of what's going on here.

Speaker 1

Kelly, Jane and suggod to talk to you. I'm sorry it's under these circumstances. We look forward to her reading yourself and understanding America in the pages of the New York Post. All of this money.

Speaker 12

Thanks Paul.

Speaker 1

That's our show for tonight. May I just quickly say happy birthday to my little brother Jason. He has a better man that I could ever dream of being. He is a wonderful father, a great husband, and just a spectacular bloke. Happy birthday, man,

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android