Up next, How Loud with Johano Caldwell Partlynglis. This is out Loud with Giano Caldwell. If you've been watching television, if you've been reading the blogs, you've been looking at the mainstream media, you know what they've already said and projected. That is that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have won this election. They've projected that Joe Biden is the forty six president of the United States. For many of you,
I am certain that you reject this narrative. One, the election hasn't been certified to in Wisconsin, in Michigan there's going to be recounts, and also Delfia rather Pennsylvania, I should say, the Supreme Court has said for those votes that came in beyond eight o'clock that's a p m. Eastern standard time on election day, those the votes should be set aside mail invalids, et cetera. So you and
I both know that this election isn't yet over. Now here's the truth if it is found out after the recount and Wisconsin, Michigan, and if there's no evidence of voter fraud presented in places like Pennsylvania and Nevada and Joe Biden is found to have won this election fans square as a conservative and as those who are listening who are either conservatives, Trump supporters, or you may be a Democrat listening to this, I recognize that I have
a vast difference of opinion when it comes to listeners. I recognize that you know that if it's found out that there's not rather been presented evidence of voter fraud, then Joe Biden won this election. You know, we can have difference of opinions, but we would know that that would be the case. And unlike liberals, we're not going to riot, loot, steal from your local Walmar target. You don't have to board up your building. We will accept the results of the election and move on with life
as we always do. We will go to work the next day. But at this time it doesn't feel among a lot of individuals that this has been a fair and legitimate election. There's been cause a voter fraud, which we're not necessarily seen the evidence of. We're waiting for
the evidence. We've understood that there's been people in places like Nevada who voted who didn't live in the state, which would make it an illegitimate vote, and we're waiting to see that evidence come forth where seeing that in places like Philadelphia, we have a witness who works for the United States Postal Service who said that the postmaster in that area has said if any votes come in past election day to post dated to November two. These
are reports that have come out. I don't know if it's true yet or not, but these are at least what have been said. So with that being the case, I'm here allow Giano Caldwell not projecting Joe Biden to be the winner at point. If there's some additional information that comes out which solidifies that, then absolutely we will
call it what it is. We are not whiners, we are not losers, and we're not gonna do what the left did when they say Joe, when they said Donald Trump brother is not our president because they didn't like the results. That's not who we are as conservatives, and that's not who we will ever be because we have
a lot more to look forward to. It looks like the Republican Party may keep the Republican Senate, which we need to prevent any radical left Green New Deal, any radical left tax increases on those who make over four hundred thousand or more is what Joe Biden said. But we know the truth. It's not about who makes four hundred housing them more. Once you decide you're gonna raise taxes, everybody gets their taxes raises, whether it be directly or indirectly.
If a person and has a business and a corporation and you're gonna raise the taxes, you know that the item that they may sell becomes more. You know that anybody that's associated with that company could be laid off because they don't want to pay additional taxes and have a particular group of folks working for them. And I'm talking about they lay all people because they can't afford it. We know what that means. We're not idiots. We understand the dynamics at play, and that's why so many of
you voted for Donald Trump. Now I'll tell you this, and this is very interesting. I think Tom Fitton, who's our guests for today, offered some legal analysis, or rather he's not a lawyer, so I don't want to say legal analys He offered an analysis that I think the Donald Trump campaign may follow. You know that this election,
by no means is over the process. Is what I'm referring to the election supposedly ended on Tuesday, but the process continues, recounts, recounts, recounts, and you need to be following very very closely. I'll tell you this, Donald Trump has been enormously beneficial to the American people. I don't agree with everything he says, I don't agree with everything he tweets. I don't agree at all, and I think it's important for me to mention that to you. However,
from a policy specific standpoint, he's been enormously beneficial. And if the exit polling, which is still coming in, we're still learning what the results are every day because there's counts, counts and counts. If Republicans are smart, they're going to take a page out of Donald Trump's playbook. Whether keep being in the White House for four more years from
now or into January, we must must enlarge attempt. I wrote a piece that came out on Fox News dot Com over the week in talking about that very specific issue. We have to enlarge the tent. We have to ensure that we're in the racist We have to include everybody. Not that we change our principles, but we welcome new voices in We keep our principles and we move forward. But I'll tell you this, we cannot stop fighting. And for those who may think it's a lost cause because
the media has called it, you're wrong. Let me tell you that right now. And you may be a loyal listener. You may listen to this podcast every Monday when it comes out, and I thank you for your listenership, but I want to tell you directly and forcefully, you're wrong. This election is not over. It is not over until the recounts have happened, until every legal vote has been counted,
until we get a decision from the courts. When the courts decide, then we understand and Republicans, if Joe Biden has one fair and square, he has one and he will be the president. And I will tell you this right now. We won't be running out saying that Joe Biden is and our president. If it's legal, if it's one fan square, we will not be doing that. We won't do what the left did under Donald Trump. They said that he wasn't their president. And of course the
election was fair and square. And we know that Hillary Clinton Steel hasn't gotten over it. The Democrats and on the folks that still haven't gotten over it. Nancy Pelosi, in fact, has said that this election was a mandate from the American people. How so you lost seats in the House, We're likely to keep the Republicans Senate. This wasn't a mandate, not by no measure. And now we
have to ensure that every legal vote is counted. So I wanna make sure that everyone that's under the sound of my voice, everyone who's watching what I placed on social media, that we're all in this together. We are Americans. And if Joe Biden is president, if it is every legal vote counted ensures that he is pressed did it, we will say that he is the president of the United States after he's inaugurated. If he's inaugurated, we have no issue with that. But we want to ensure that
there was no cheating and no fraud. And I'm gonna be honest with you, there's a lot of funny business going on. We don't know what exactly it means. But keep your head up, keep fighting, stay on social media until every legal vote is counted. This is outlied with Gianno called well, listen to Tom Fenton, listened to his advice, and send this podcast around to all of your friends and family because we will never stop fighting. This is outled with Gianno called blow Tom. Thank you again for
joining us. I think you're one of the most important guests that I could ever have, especially on an issue like this. A lot of Americans are concerned about the integrity of our elections. They're concerned about transparency. They're concerned about what happened to their vote. They about actually get counted, that additional individuals put votes in the system that weren't
supposed to be there. There's a lot of questions, and I think you told The New York Times last week that the Department of Justice should be prepared to go to court to stop the counting of any mail in ballots that arrived after election day. Why do you believe the DLJ should do that, because I think the law requires it. When you and your listeners can go and look it up, it's three USC Section one of the US Code, and the paraphrase it says, election days on Tuesday.
The electors for the president and vice president is supposed to be selected on Tuesday. Is that happening in Pennsylvania? Is that happening in Georgia? Did that happen in Wisconsin or Michigan. No, they counted ballots after election day. Frankly, counting ballots after that arrived after election day, it really is awful. But under the law, you really shouldn't be counting ballots that arrive at after election day at all. They should have figured out who want on Tuesday. We
do know who want on Tuesday. The president did and that result, in my view, should be defended in court and if it comes down to it in Congress when they choose to ratify or not ratify the electors that have been sent there by the states. So how do you respond when people say, hey, there's been elections in the past where people are waiting in line for hours
on end to get their ballots in. It's and it can be clearly at some point, I know there's been some elections where has been passed midnight because people are waiting. With that still be in conclusive with your argument in
terms of the election is on Tuesday. Well, it would be a reminder to the states they can't do that anymore, that they got to make sure people are voting and they have to count, you know, and in theory you can count for the administrative work record you know what the what the numbers are for days after election, but it can't change the result. And if the results to be changed, there's the process for doing that under law, which is through the electoral College and the state's election
of the state legislature and the governor certifying electors. But we know who want on Tuesday, but the results been changed or if you know, or it's said to be changed because the fat Lady hasn't sign in that regard. You know, the no president is there's going to be no new president until Congress. Plus is it under our constitutional and federal system, we have to take a quick break. Please stick with us now. Judicial Watches no strange of
the lawsuits. Your organization has successfully sued the government several times to access key information the powerful people didn't want the American people to see. Perhaps the most famous case of all was Hillary Clinton and her email scandal. What does Judicial Watch doing implanted to do in terms of legal action regarding this election, Well, we're already in the courts trying to make sure the roles are clean and
it highlights the information we'll be able to uncover. Why it's important that we be skeptical of mailing ballots to people who haven't asked for them, when the roles are filthy across the nation. In Nevada, for instance, which is in dispute still, we found there were counties with more people on the rolls, on the voter roles and who are living there in aligeable account, they got more people on the roles and they were moving, they were actually there.
So that's an indication that the roles are dirty, and and if you have dirty election roles, in my view, you can have dirty elections. You know what's interesting because you you mentioned Nevada and Adam Housley, who's a former journalist at Fox News Reporter you may know him. He posted on Twitter last week that he spoke with a family in Nevada and apparently he verified their concerns. He said he decided to check their ballot status online. They
got it. They got this ballot and it's about five of them, and they registered, They were registered to vote, and they voted about a week and a half before the election in person, and they voted for President Trump. But somehow the system is saying that their vote isn't there, almost as though they'd never voted to begin with. Do you think these kind of things are kind of cases are being realized on all of the country or in
the battle or in some of these swing stakes. Well, when you have tens of millions of ballots being counted, there are going to be issues like that pop pop up. And the question is that a substantial enough issue to raise questions about the outcome? Generally, you know, you don't need in my view, and the Left is setting after this false standard that you need to prove that the
fraud was material to the outcome of the election. I think what you need the show is that there's enough evidence of fraud and there's enough evidence that they weren't doing enough to combat fraud that you can question the results. I think that's the case in Philadelphia. I think it's the case in Detroit, Atlanta, Fulton County deciding to stop the counting ballots on election day or what what? What's
up with that? You know those are indisha fraud and you know, I don't know if the courts are gonna buy into it, but certainly, again, as I peak on pointing out, this is a pot a cool question. And under our constitutional system, the legislatures in Pennsylvania, which is controlled by Republicans Sam in Georgia, same Wisconsin, saving Michigan.
They're going to have to decide whether they're going to ratify and endorse what went on, or maybe a point their own slate of electors that support President Trump and let Congress figure out who to accept. It could come
down to what Congress does in January. So so let me ask you this question, what advice which And I'm sure you've been in touch with President Trump in this campaign, and I know that they rely on you a great deal for your legal expertise because you've uncovered a lot of things that the American people wouldn't have known about. What advice have you either given the campaign of President
Trump or what advice would you give them? Well, hey, I'm not a lawyer, so I don't give legal advice, and certainly any advice I give to anyone privately, I'm not going to talk about. But you know, I've been pretty public about what I think ought to be done. They need the challenge and protect the result that took place on Tuesday. Challenge votes being counted after the fact, either that arrived after election Day or frankly counted for
days afterwards. In a way that undermine the outcome. The rules don't allow for that in my view under federal law. And then secondly, they have to be aware and prepared to challenge all of that in the courts. They may be able to ask for a redo of the election in Pennsylvania and Georgia. I don't know, maybe if they
have enough evidence of fraud another misconduct. And then secondly there's the constitutional option in terms of the electoral college and having the state legislatures exercise their prerogatives under our constitutional system to select the electors that better comport what they think was the appropriate outcome in Pennsylvania and Georgia. What's the likelihood of something like that actually taking place? Well, we'll never take place unless there's leadership for it and
we're providing it. Okay, what type of changes what you'd like to see happen for the federal election laws, Well, we need to make it clear. You need to figure out who want on the Tuesday of the election. Okay, I think the law is clear there. The degree needs to be clarified. There should be no mail in ballots except in extraordinary, limited circumstances. There should be significant security for those mail in ballots. If they're to be allowed
at all, we need universal and national. Whether it's some state by state or federal we can all argue about, but we need vote or i D. We need to confirm the identity of people are sharing the vote in both in terms of their identity and their citizenship status. You know, we know aliens are on the rolls. Studies have shown that, and we know they vote were they're voting in a way to undermine the outcome that's still
has to be determined. But because we don't really check to see if aliens are on the roles or not in any regular way, we have no idea unless they once they decide to really seriously investigate. And you know what, I know there's been talking about a national vote or i D requirement across the country and people Emilian folks on the left there there against voter i D laws. And I know in cases that you need vote, you need ide to cash a check, you need idea to
go get up a government benefit. Well, what seems to be the logical argument against it? I don't. I don't see there being one, do you There is? In my view, there the logical argument against voter ideas They want to be able to steal elections when necessary and sell voter id gets in the way of doing that. Judicial Watch recently released a study funding that three hundred and fifty three counties across twenty nine states had one point eight
million more registered voters than eligible voting age citizens. In other words, the voter registration rates in those counties exceeded one of eligible voters. Tell me about the study and how does it factor into the post election madness that's going on right now. Well, when you have more people on the roles than eligible to vote, that those are opportunities for voter fraud. It doesn't mean they're all voted voting fraudulently, but that's a pool from which frosters can
draw to mess with the election. And it's a further indication that their voters are on the roles that shouldn't be there, that they're not taking their generally not doing the required list maintenance that would reassure voters that only people who are supposed to be there are being able to vote. And so when you mix that in with what's happening in places like Nevada, where, for instance, the Republicans are alleging that people have moved away, we're voting
in Nevada. That kind of fits in with our concerns about what went on in Nevada where they got names of people who have probably moved away for some time, still on the rolls and eligible to vote in theory, But do you think even if those people are provided and I know that last week they were saying they had a list of folks that they were gonna send to the election officials. I think it was the county
prosecutor in Nevada. Um they've wanted to have them take a look at it, do you think it'll make those individual invalidate those votes? Essentially? Who knows. I'm not saying they shouldn't do it, but I don't see anything the campaign's doing it's going to change the what's happening now.
So you don't think there's any legal tactic of the campaign even pushing it up to the Supreme Court, because we're not seeing, at least as of late, we've heard about evidence, not necessarily seen it per se, any grand amount of evidence that could possibly change the outcome of the election. But there's this idea, at least among a lot of folks that things have happened that shouldn't happen.
We can talk about transparency being a big issue. We can talk about the fact that when the campaign got a judgment to go in and be able to view the counting of votes in Philadelphia, the sheriff wouldn't even enforce it. No one's enforcing it, and it seems as though these folks just don't care. I don't think it's about having a legitimate and fair election. It's kind of like, what are you gonna do anyway? And it's how do
you do? Not understanding? I hear what you're saying. I guess I go back to what relief are they seeking? Are they doing? Are they seeking this sort of release? It's gonna change. Yeah, I'll come with the election. I don't. I just don't see it now if they went in and you know, again, I go back to my legal argument, or it's a political legal argument. I guess that election day was on Tuesday, and all the votes after that were or were inappropriate, and people will be mad that
their votes weren't counted, but they got into late. That's their problem, and it's the state's problem that shut up that system that was foreseeable, that they would have gotten into late. I mean, under this logic, we could be counting ballots through January. Does that make any sense anybody? Why not? Why if it's two days, why not three days? Why not twenty days? Indeed it is twenty days in Ohio, it's seventeen days in California. How does that comport with
any semblance of regular, uncorrupt elections? But do you think that argument would have some sway on this opion? Court? Would they throw out the vote if you're looking to change the outcome? I don't know what elder argument you'd make. To me. It's a plain reading of statutory law. It's an easy thing for the court to figure out when
way or another. They may not buy into it, but I think it would be attractive to justices who actually want to apply the law is written as opposed to what's happening right now that they're pretending the law doesn't matter. So you think that's the only argument that they can
make that may change at least the diamondamices. There are other arguments they can ask for potentially a do over in certain states because there has this that there's been enough fraud associated with the process that the court may be persuaded. The only way to resolve it is to do a do over. That's been done before. It was done just last year in North Carolina and congressional race where Republican consultant was involved in fraud and and it was a do over. So do overs are possible in
the states. That's another possibility and can be done in time for the electoral College to consider the the votes that arise from such a duo. So what's the standard you think you just is it? I'm not familiar with the case you just mentioned it well that I don't know what the standard would be for the court to authorize a do over. That's where the lawyers have to come in and see what what hoops they need to jump through in order to legally persuade a court to
do a do over. I would presume that you know what went on in Pennsylvania, the gamesmanship that went on in Pennsylvania. Maybe they say, look, you know that's been so that process has been so corrupted by this misconduct. The only way to kind of resolve it and reassure, reassure the law the court is to do it over again and then man vindicate the votes of people who
want to vote honestly and have their votes kind of appropriately. Yeah, and that that the way things are looking, especially considering the fact that Trump he was running against the media, he was running against social media. He's running against Joe Biden,
running against the Leeds to Democrats. And honestly, I think this might have been the outcome had people believed that he could possibly win in seen they took him as a joke, so they didn't go to Wisconsin, they didn't go to a lot of these states to Hillary Clinton laws. But we might have seen probably this kind of outcome, and people took Donald Trump seriously. And it's just a shame to see that the public's vote, in terms of the integrity of the election could end up like this.
It should be about transparency. Who knows who might have committed fraud or not. No one knows. I don't have any evidence to that. I can only imagine that that some may have occurred. But still, in all, for this to be the state of our elections is disturbing. Yeah, it is. And and you know, personally, we may have our own views about who should win and lose, right,
but it's not about that. It's about the process being something that vindicates the rule of law, reassures the public that the elections were free and fair, and if that process isn't there, that should be concerning for everybody, both you know, honest liberals and and honest conservatives like you and me. Yeah. Absolutely. Now, you've been busy recent days on covering documents about Hannah Biden and Biden families business dealings overseas. What information have you found that the American
people might not know about. Oh, there's a lot going on there. Um. We had emails coming from the State Department showing that the State Department was concerned about what Hunter Biden was doing. They were monitoring what was going on about it in terms of social media. In fact,
one social media person, accuse me. One Obama state official called Barisma the gift that keeps on giving, and he bemoaned the fact that the Russians were trolling and that's his work, Joe Biden, because of his conflicts of interest, because of his son being on Barisma while he's pretending to be against Ukraine corruption in Ukraine. Do you think
so it's just a deep state. They all knew about what was going on there, and they knew it was a problem and a longstanding one, and that certainly that is contradicts the fake news we've been getting about the Biden scandal. Yeah, and reporting show that during that time that Obama White House had issues with Biden's sun being on a board being on that board, and they raise flags all throughout the White House on it, but of
course it continued on. Do you think that if Joe Biden is it's worn in as president in in January, do you expect that we'll see more of these kind of shenanigans on her hunter Biden I can get away with it. I think the more substantial outcome, or were likely i'llcome frankly, is that he's going to be facing criminal investigations, either her son is or he will be.
So that's that's the more likely income outcome. I mean, I guess it's Underbiden keep said down if his president father becomes president, but there's still accountability to be had for what went on here, and that's going to require just Smarmer to do something. And you know, I'm not naive about the likelihood of d O J doing anything under Joe Biden administration, but it's going to be difficult for them not to do something, because again, you know,
we still have a republic. It's been weakened, but the rule of law is still a big issue, and it's hard to, uh, at least avoid it faith in your face way, Well, if the Obama folks spot on Donald Trump's campaign, the Hillary email scandal went without her being prosecuted, I just find it hard to believe that the elites like Joe Biden and Hunter Biden anything would happen to him.
I think I kind of lost faith in the judicial, the court system, the prosecutors, and the d o J because it seems as though the elite seemingly get away with it. And interestingly enough, I don't necessarily although Trump is the president of the United States, I don't necessarily consider him one of the elites. Per site. He seems like he's one of the guys that's kind of with
the people. And interestingly enough, I spoke with a friend of mine who's really high up in Joe Biden's campaign, and he mentioned to me that he thinks that if Donald Trump loses, he's gonna get prosecuted for what. I
have no idea. I don't know if this is an internal restation going on in Joe Biden's campaign or what they what they may be thinking there, But that's actually something I can see them attempting to do, especially considering the fact that Trump has put his finger in their eyes every time he gets a chance, which is his right. So I'm interested. Do you think anything may become of that?
I'm not sure what they could be A llegend would be prosecutable, but your thoughts, Oh, I believe President Trump will continue to be harassed after Healy's office, whether it be even whether it be next year or four years or now. It's never gonna stop. It never will stop. And they don't need a reason. I mean, we already know that they did it before with no reason, no justification, so why would they need a reason? Now? Yeah, I agree,
And and it's been terrible. There's been this terrible corruption. There's been no accountability for it. So there's gonna be the you know, bad guys wh only stop what bad guys do when you put him in jail or make it make the game not worth playing. And there's no reason for them to stop. There's been no countabile city. And if you're Joe Biden or that people around him, they're like, oh, look, we got back into office despite everything that we have been implicated in. Why would we
stop doing it? You know, there's been no there's been no sanction for doing it, so it's not gonna stop. Let's continue the conversation on the other side of the break. First, as a word from our sponsor, this is so interesting. What good news do you think we can share with our listeners because I think this is at all the podcasts I've done, and we've been on the air for about a month now, massive thanks to the lusteners, because we've been getting exciting numbers. Is there any good news
to share? Well, Hillary Clinton is in president. I don't think Joe Biden is going to be do you know He's in a even if he had taken the Senate, even if he had gotten more seats in the House, that the Left can't do everything they want to do as quickly as they wanted to do and as successfully as they thought they would be able to do. There's always going to be an opposition and honest opposition, and it would have been significant even if they had taken
control of the executive and legislative branch. And this is assuming if Joe Biden nor wins, and that's not that's a big in Somesact. Presume that he wins. The Senate is controlled by the Republicans, So there's gonna be no court packing. There's gonna be no DC statehood, no Puerto
Rican statehood, no medicare for all. So a lot of that big socialism is going to be significantly curtailed assuming the Republicans control, and more importantly, Conservatives control the Senate, because, as you know, Republicans sometimes can include people who want to do the wrong thing for the wrong reasons. Yeah, let me. I got just two questions that I want to get it with. One question I want to get into your book. What do you think President Trump would
do if, in fact he did lose. Do you think he would go away? I doubt he would. Would he run again in in four years? What happens to the mega movement make America a Great Again movement? What do you think would be the outcome of that? Because I know he's not going to stop fighting. This election certainly isn't over. The courts are going to have their saying.
For people who've been listening to me on this podcast, allow with you, Carblo, I said, and predicted time and time again that this would end up in the courts. I just didn't think Democrats would play fairly with this, and we're seeing it end up in the court. Perhaps, what do you think would happen if President Trump were to lose fair and square. I don't know what he's
gonna do. I don't know he's gonna run again. I don't know, you know, but I think we should think about what we're gonna do, and what I'm gonna do, and whatich is Issue Watch is gonna do. When I suspect you're gonna do the same thing, you're gonna take the same approach. He's just gonna keep on working. You know, we've got lawsuits we have to pursue. There's Joe Biden in the presidency and there's corruption associated with his conduct.
We're gonna investigate that. When you to oppose big socialism and big corruption and big secrecy, that almost always go hand in hand. You know, we're just gonna We're gonna continue to be patriots. We're gonna be continuing to fulfill Judicial watches mission to hold the government accountable to the people and make sure that the government tells us what it's up to so that we can hold it accountable.
That's what we're gonna do, and we're gonna do that whether or not Trump wont And I think that's what patriots should be thinking about. What are they what were they going to do? Anyway, and just do more of it because it will be significantly different challenges, maybe even worse challenges with a different president. But you know, you still just you know, the fight changes a little bit, but the fight continues in terms of the big picture.
I'm actually surprised by your answer. That's she was gonna say you go out right and loot and yell at the moon would be the more like and not like the lab for that too. Well, that's good news, and you're right. I will absolutely continue. I don't do that company. Okay,
personal time, that's another question, but absolutely agree. I think that's something that a lot of conservatives really need to hear, because I've friends call me in tears when the day after the election of wondering nothing, there's nothing worth crying over. Crying for the unborn who may die and increase numbers under a Biden presidency, that's worth crying about. But if you've done what you can do in terms of affecting your public policy values and defending the country as you
see fit. There's nothing to cry about. You've done what you can do, and you can go to sleep easy at night, and you just have to keep on battling as you see fit. But if you do what you can do, don't worry about it. That's nothing. You know, no use crying over something you can't change. Now that makes sense. Well, just last month, you publish your latest book, A Republic under Assault, the left's ongoing attack on American freedom.
What's your argument of the book and why did you decide to write this now, which it seems very appropriate, Well, getting to get a little negative to kind of highlight what the you know, our republic is under assault. The president was under assault for years. The presidency was under assault. That was President Trump personally, but the constitutional office was
under attack. They assaulted our sovereignty by trying to break our borders with the caravan invasion and trying to allow that to continue on abated with having you know, essentially
have open borders. And on top of that, you've had the assault on our free and fair elections, which we've been talking about, which the consequences of which we've been talking about, which is the chaos, the lack of security, and the likelihood of unchecked fraud that you know, we can't even really figure out because we don't even have the rules in place to help us figure that out. So, you know, our republic content, you know, relies on the ability of the people to govern themselves and not to
be waylaid through corruption. And that's what's happened with the assault on the presidency, our republic, the assault on our are, our borders, our sovereignty, and the assault on our elections. Wow. Uh must read your book sincerely, and I want to thank you so much for your time today. You're doinging credible work, incredible work, and I would love for folks to know your social media handles so they can follow you.
You put out important videos all the time. You put out a lot of important information that people really should read. I think that you uncover so much that people didn't even think it was possible that Hillary email can't scandal as a as a point, and the hunter Biden the situation, We're going to continue to follow and see what's gonna come out of that, especially if there's a Joe Biden presidency. Will Hunter Biden try to use the US government as a piggy bank so you can get billions of dollars
in contract and to enrich himself. And the ten percent to the big guy, which man goes up may go up to thirty percent, now who knows, or just give me the whole thing. I ask for a bigger chunk since he has a better Yeah, if if he were still in this right. So we're still in this right. So thank I know, I know, but yeah, no, I get you a pent So thank you. Please tell the people where they can follow you. Yeah, it's an at
judicial I at Tom Fitton. We're on Facebook at Judicial Watch and real Tom fitting on Facebook and I and I say this because I believe it, not because it's me. Our Twitter feeds are the best album. If you really wanting material that you are an interesting take that you're not going to hear from somebodywhere else where. We're actually providing leadership on these issues. You want to follow our Twitter. That's why they're censoring us because we're probably we're saying
the wrong things about what's going on right now. And I know we go mad viral. I see you can go viral and a regular consistent basis. So thank you for your work and thank you for being a patriot. Thank you, jam I assume to take You're good on my pleasure. Thank you. If you're enjoying the show, we leave us a review and rate us with five stars
on Apple Podcasts. Also follow me on social media Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook at Gianno Caldwell g I A N N O Caldwell c A L d W E l L. If you have any questions for me, please email me it out loud a Ginglish three sixty and I'll try to answer them in the future episode. If you're interested in learning more about me, please get my latest book, Taken for Granted, How Conservatism Can Run Back to the
Americans Did Liberalism Fell? Thank you to our researcher Aaron Kleinman and executive producers Debbie Myers and of course speaker ne Ggbridge, part of the Gingrige three sixty network.