The Birthright Citizenship Case Is Actually Something Differently Terrible - podcast episode cover

The Birthright Citizenship Case Is Actually Something Differently Terrible

May 16, 202559 minEp. 1158
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

OA1158 - We start off with some patron questions about what to do when ICE comes to your neighborhood, the one thing that the world’s most annoying white libertarians got right, and how to best exercise the very few rights US citizens have coming back into the country. Then in our main story: This week the Supreme Court heard arguments over birthright citizenship--or did it? Matt explains how they might do something even worse than expected while still striking down Trump’s attempt to end the  Constitutional right to citizenship for everyone born on US soil by executive order. 

Finally, we polish off today’s episode with a meaty footnote about the lies and tyranny of a very different kind of would-be monarch.

  1. Oral arguments in Trump v. CASA (5/15/25)

  2. Trump v. CASA docket 

  3. Western District of PA federal judge Stephanie Haines’s ruling upholding the application of the Alien Enemies Act to members of Tren de Aragua

  4. “Sense of the community” memo dated 4/7/25 finding that Tren de Aragua is not working with the Venezuelan government

  5. Complaint in Coleman et al v. Burger King

 

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast
The Birthright Citizenship Case Is Actually Something Differently Terrible | Opening Arguments podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast