Biden’s Border Action - An Objective, Nuanced Explainer - podcast episode cover

Biden’s Border Action - An Objective, Nuanced Explainer

Jun 07, 202455 minEp. 1039
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

OA1039

Trump’s prosecution for election interference in Georgia was just stayed by the Court of Appeals, leaving no chance that this trial will proceed before November. What happened, and how unexpected was this delay? We investigate.

We then turn to our main story: Biden administration’s executive actions to “shut down the border” and close the door to asylum for many people who would otherwise be eligible. Matt explains what’s actually going on here and how much of it was already in place before we consider the practical and political consequences of Joe Biden effectively carrying out the border bill which Trump bullied Republicans not to pass. 

We end by spending a few minutes discussing a recent opinion from Judge Frank Easterbrook of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, who has very strong--and extremely appropriate--opinions about fonts.

 

If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast
Biden’s Border Action - An Objective, Nuanced Explainer | Opening Arguments podcast - Listen or read transcript on Metacast