Dr. Paul Davies, the search for ET - podcast episode cover

Dr. Paul Davies, the search for ET

Apr 24, 201043 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Paul Davies is a British-born theoretical physicist, cosmologist, astrobiologist and best-selling author. He is Director of the Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science and co-Director of the Cosmology Initiative, both at Arizona State University. He has recently spoken at the Pontifical Academy for Science’s Study Week on Astrobiology at the Vatican, and the Royal Society’s recent conference on astrobiology.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/open-minds-uap-news--6161161/support.

Transcript

This is a commercial, free archive edition of our live radio show that airs every Friday at noon, Arizona time on openminds dot TV. Welcome to open Minds Radio with your host Alejandro Rojas, former official spokesperson from the Mutual UFO

Network. Alejandro who's been a UFO paranormal researcher and journalists for nearly a decade and has logged hours in the field investigating the paranormal up close and personal, and now Open Minds Radio presents evidence in the latest news regarding the UFO phenomenon. Here's your host, Alejandro Rojas. Hello and welcome to Open Minds Radio, where we're bringing the UFO subject into the light of day. This is Alejandro Rojas and we have another spectacular show today. I always get so excited

to speak to you people. Today we have who we were supposed to have last week, doctor Paul Davies. Unfortunately we had a phone issue last week and luckily he was able to reschedule. But still a lot of people appreciated hearing me and Jason go over the news for the show. And there's always so much interesting stuff to talk about in this field, and today we're going

to be talking about a lot of really cool stuff with a skeptic. Yes, mister Paul Davies is a skeptic when it comes to UFOs and possible extraterrestrial presence here on Earth. However, because of him, this subject has been in the news a lot. Paul Davies has a new book coming out that's called The Eerie Science Silence. It's kind of about SETI and what they're doing

to look into UFOs and extraterrestrials. And he also spoke at the Vatican Reads recently and the Royal Society's Conference on Astrobiology, all of which has been getting a lot of news across mainstream media. So all about extraterrestrials. Here's his bio, which is really interesting. Paul Davies is a British born theoretical physicist.

He's a cosmologist, astrobiologist, and best selling author. He is the director of the Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science and co director of the Cosmology Initiative at Arizona State University. Although he's all over the world talking on these subjects, as I mentioned, he spoke at the Vatican and this was at the Pontifical Academy for Science, his study week on astrobiology, and at the Vatican the Royal Society's recent conference on astrobiology, and it had kind of

a cool name. It was called the Detection of Extraterrestrial Life and the Consequences for Science and Society, So that title. It's just kind of cool to have some major organization out in the UK, some stuffy scientist organization talking about this stuff. So we're gonna be talking to doctor Davies about all of this

and more. Of course, we talked a lot about how Hillary Clinton was holding doctor Davies's book when she was meeting with Lawrence Rockefeller, who was trying to get the Clinton administration to release information on UFOs, So we'll talk about that as well. Exciting breakthrough when we finally figured out what the book was that she was holding in their meeting. Otherwise, a little bit of business before we get into the news. Our magazine, Open Mind Magazine is in

the stores. I've been telling you people that it's been in every store. But you know, we've got this girl who works with us, Maureene, who's always got to burst our bubble. Thanks Maureene, just kidding. She's she's actually there's a lot of cool stuff for us. Now she's back there just berating me in the corner, but luckily you can't hear her. But actually, we're not in every bookstore for the first run, but we will be for the second. So it's only select Barnes and Nobles and Borders book

starters out there that you can get it. But you can always go to Openminds dot tv and order it. You've got very friendly service and there's lots of cool stuff to see there on the website while you're ordering. However, this next edition which is coming out June first, which it has a lot of Vatican stories in it, including a story from the Jesuits ex lawyer.

I forget exactly what his title was, but essentially someone who worked for the Jesuits to story on the Vatican and ets and UFOs and all that cool stuff. So the next magazine will be out soon June first, and all the stories. We've gotten a lot of great feedback on the magazine. Also local and if you want to fly out here to Scottsdale, Arizona, you can come and meet the editors of Open Minds Magazine, which includes myself, and

we'll be talking about our stories at vision Quest Metaphysical Bookstore. That will be April thirtieth at seven pm and they are at two two two five North Scottsdale Road, so that will be a lot of fun. And then finally join us in Roswell and we'll have a lot more information on that coming up July fourth and Roswell, come and see the fireworks. Hopefully we won't accidentally cause

another UFO crash with the fireworks out there. But Roswell has a big festival on the fourth of July weekend to commemorate the alleged crash of the UFO back in nineteen forty seven. So that'll be a lot of fun and we'll be there. But before we get to our guests, let's get into UFOs. In the news, and of course, as always we have our news correspondent Jason McClelland Jason tell us all about the good afternoon Alejandro, Hello Phoenix,

and Hello world. This is your Open Mind's News Brief for Friday, April twenty third, twenty ten. In the News this week, NASA's planet hunting probe, known as Kepler, may have found four hundred Earth life planets, but don't expect NASA to share any details for a while. NASA has procedures in place for sharing research data, but details related to the four hundred objects of interest, as they've been called, were sealed from the public by a

NASA panel until at least February twenty eleven. The panel cited a need to study the planets more closely as their reason for stealing the information. Yeah, kind of weird. I mean, they've been looking for extra solar planets and those that possibly have life for a long time and it's been all supposedly being shown to the public. Why all of a sudden did they say they've got

to keep this seth secret? Very strange. It is strange, And they didn't give an answer as to why, right I said, we're doing it. They just wanted to do it. They think they need more time. But it's interesting because they don't usually do that. Yeah, but if any NASA officials are listening and they do find something really cool about these planets, February twenty eleven is when they say they're going to release the data, and

that's perfect time for our international UFO Congress. Yeah, exactly, so hopefully, and if they wanted to and we should give them this offer. They can come down to the UFO Congress and release their information there. We can certainly make that happen, right absolutely. In other science news, Gary Rufkin, a professor of genetics at Harvard University, has developed a microfluidics chip that

could be used in the future to shift Martian soil for alien DNA. The chip would be installed on a soil collecting rover vehicle and would cause any microscopic life within the Martian dust to release its genetic material. Chemicals in the chip would then amplify the DNA and label it with fluorescent dyes. Ruffcan estimates his team as only three percent complete with designing a workable Martian DNA sequencing machine, but still though it is pretty cool. Yeah cool, you know, put

that baby in a rover and be interesting to see what they find. On TV this week, the History Channel is running a series entitled Ancient Aliens. The series explores the evidence of ancient aliens and looks at the ancient alien theory, a notion fathered by Swiss author Eric Vondanikin. According to the theory, space travelers visited Earth thousands of years ago, and they talked humans about technology

and influenced ancient religions. Ancient Aliens airs Tuesdays at seven pm, Arizona Time on the History Channel, and I believe they air reruns on Saturday nights, so check your local listings. Also in the news, our guests today, Paul Davies. His new book, The Eerie Silence, Renewing Our Search for Alien Intelligence, was reviewed in The New York Times this week, adding to the tremendous amount of mainstream press Professor Davies has already received during the past couple

of months. Yeah, he's gotten just megapress all over the place. I'm excited to have him on the show today. I know, meet Tim. That's it from the news. Remember to check out these stories and more. TV your source for UFO related news. I'm your Open Mindes News correspondent Jason McClellan. And you've been briefed back to you, Alejandro. Alright. Yes, when we get Paul Davies on in just a few minutes here, after our next commercial break, which is coming up in a few seconds, we

will be talking about SETI. He used to be a backer of this group, and we'll talk more about who and what they are. If you're not familiar, but he says there's probably better ways to do what they're doing, which, of course we felt all the time. We'll be talking about the Vatican and Hillary Clinton with Paul Davies when he comes back after this break.

Hello, and welcome back to Open Minds Radio. This your host Alejandro Rojas, and we've got a little bit of a delay with Paul Davies getting online. He'll be here very soon. But one thing I wanted to mention about him, which is kind of cool, and maybe Jason, if you can share your comments as well, But this is a guy who has an asteroid named after him. In nineteen ninety two, officially OG six eight seven oh I think is the name of the asteroid was renamed Paul Davies in his honor.

How cool is that? I did not know that. That's pretty cool. Yeah. One of the things I want to talk to him about also is which is interesting that he spoke at the Vatican because he talked about Christianity

having the biggest issue. And what's interesting is this is just prior to the Vatican having their astrobiology conference, so I'm wondering if it has something to do with them doing this, but that Christianity, out of all the religions, really has kind of the hardest problem philosophically with the idea give extraterrestrial intelligence, and mainly because like Heath hawks about is a second genesis, that this idea that when Jesus died, he died to save humankind. So if there are

others out there, did he die for them as well? Did he go talk with them? Did he reincarnate? But really Christianity doesn't allow for the idea of reincarnation, So a lot of issues there that they're looking into. The series that's running on the History Channel right now, The Ancient Aliens, also dives into ancient religions and a lot of what Eric Mondanakin talks about is

religion and aliens playing into that. Yeah, one of the things that I think is really interesting is that there are a lot of ancient religion and cultures, or at least you know, a lot of cultures don't have that whole concept of religion, but it's more of philosophy or origin stories where they came from, and a lot of them refer to origin stories where they come from the stars. But it looks like we do have doctor Davies on the line, so let's bring him up with Hello, doctor Davies. Are you there,

Yes, Hello, Stories of the technical hiccup. Oh, no problem. We had a bigger technical hiccup last week, so at least we got you on. Thank goodness, it's wonderful to hear from you, and thank you so much for coming on the show. It's a pleasure. But I guess let's start off. We'll start up, you know, the show.

We had sent you some information about Hillary Clinton and your book. We'll get into that later on, and also the Vatican, but I really want to start off with your new book, The Eerie Silence, and some of what you're going into there. And really you're talking about the search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence SETI, which I know you had some involvement with in the past, and how there may be better ways to be looking for intelligent life other than the

radio signal way that they're using. Yes, it's fifty years ago this month that Frank Drake, a then little known American astronomer, decided to start sweeping the skies with a radio telescope in the hope of stumbling across a message from ET. And this is known as SETI the search for rex of terrestrial intelligence.

It's got nothing to do with UFOs or anything of that sort. Sothority scientific search have now involves a scientists in many countries, and it seemed to me that after fifty years of receiving nothing but an eerie silence, maybe the time had come to take stop and ask whether we can improve on what they've been doing, maybe search for ET in other ways and not just leave it

to a small band of radio astronomers. So my book The Eerie Silence is both a celebration of their heroic effort, but also opportunity to inject some new thinking into this field. And what are some of these methods that you think they can improve upon in their search. A lot of people, I think are familiar with this subject through the movie Contact, which was based on a novel by Carl Sagan, and that supposes that there is an alien community somewhere

out there that's deliberately beaming messages at us. And the problem with that is that the nearest such community, even if you ask a wild optimist, is likely to be hundreds of light years away, let's say a thousand to take

a round figure. Because nothing travels faster than light. Anybody living a thousand light years away is going to see Earth as it was a thousand years ago, and there were no radio telescopes on Earth at that time, so there's no reason that they should be sending messages directly at us, and so looking for those sorts of messages I think is pretty helpless. But instead we could look for beacons, for example. But imagine being a lighthouse keeper. You're

sending out a beam of light sweeping around in all directions. You don't expect to get a reply. It's a one way type of thing. It's a beacon that just says hello, or avoid displaced, or comes to this place. We should look for radio beacons in the galaxy that some avanced civilization may have set up a long time ago. Maybe this is now long vanished civilization left as a monument or something. But that requires a rather different type of

technique from what the set of astronomers are using at the moment. So it's just one way that we might extend the search. There are many other ways suggested in the book as well. Right, some people suggest that there are some dangers around that. In fact, I was watching a television show recently where this scientists figured out how to send out signals and he was really excited and he was telling everybody, Hey, I'm sending out a greeting to aliens

and extraterrestrials out there. And the next scene there's this civilization that said, we're getting a signal from this planet out here, and they say, okay, let's go concer it and steal their resources kind of. And some of the people say, there is maybe a danger to sending out these signals. Do you believe in that? No, I don't. I don't for one moment. And there are two things I should say. One is that the SETI program doesn't send signals. He just listens. But a few people have

sent signals. I was involved myself in a sort of gimmick of that sort recently. There's no danger at all, because you said it yourself that maybe they'll come here for our resources, but they would already know about our resources. They don't ask to tell them. In other words, if that advance, they will have been observing Earth. What you have to understand in this game is that Earth is four and a half billion years old. There were

stars and planets around billions of years before Earth even existed. So if there are alien civilizations popping up all the time around the galaxy, some of those will have been around for an immense period of time. And we're not just talking thousands of years. They're looking ten million, one hundred million, a billion years, and so during that time, there's been plenty of time for them to come and take Earth if they wanted it. This was an argument

used long ago by the famous physicist inn Rico Fermi. It's often called the Fermi paradox. Where is everybody? He said, he realized that the aliens had plenty of time to come here is that's what they wanted to do, and so they don't need us to tell them. There's no particular reason they should come here now just because we're here, when they could have come at any time in the past. Hummans have only been around in a communicative phase

for a very short period of time. You just mentioned how you were involved with a project with sending out messages and that did get a lot of press. It seems like a lot of what you're doing is getting a lot of press. What were the sort of messages? And I saw these new stories and they were kind of titled the guy Who's going to speak to Et? Where are the nature of the messages that you sent out? These were just

from young people. We did a Twitter campaign that we said as part of when I was launching my book in the UK, it was UK Science Week and so just to get young people interested in science, we invited them to submit messages and then we picked the best of the bunch. And these were really just, you know, homespun philosophy. There wasn't anything terribly profound, and it wasn't intended as a serious attempt because we have no idea where to

point the telescope. We don't know where any extraterrestrial civilization might be. Now the rules of the game were changed dramatically because we picked up a signal. If we find that there is a transmitting source at a particular place in the galaxy, then that's different. Then we have to be very very careful. And I think I chair something called the SETI Post Detection Task Group, And with our job, who think ahead? What happens to ET calls on my

watch? What do we do next? And one of the things we don't do next is tell everybody where in the sky this source is so any crack pop can command a radio telescope and start blasting away with their own Hence bun philosophy, setting themselves up as a spokesperson of mankind before we've had a chance to properly evaluate what we're dealing with. And so that's one thing I think we're all agreed on. So have you discussed and philosophized on what type of

messages you would send to such a group? Yes, And in my book I go into this in quite some detail because the way we should look at this is what I often say to my students. Imagine that Earth was going to be wiped out in ten years, and you have an opportunity to leave a message for posterity, Say something about ourselves, our culture, about our species. What is the thing we most cherish, what is most important? Surely not our physical form, surely not our sports or politics. What are

the things that we feel are our greatest achievements. Now many people would think, you know, the great works of art or literature, But the problem there is that these are hard for people to understand, even from our other cultures and other species. So we're dealing with beings who've evolved completely separately from life on Earth and whose brains are wired in totally different ways. There are going to appreciate our art on music. But there's one thing that we do

have in common, and that is mathematics. Mathematics is universal. The statement eleven is a prime number is true whether you're here or on Olpha Centaury. So mathematics is a common currency, a common language, and so of the laws of physics. Him that if out there is some you know, wonderful transmitter that they've got technology, they understand basic physics, and the laws of physics are of course mathematical relationships. So here we have something we've got in

common. We can certainly communicates our level of understanding of mathematical physics. Right, And so that may sound a bit dull to the average list murder, right, but it sounds exciting to me. But at least they would they would think, oh, yeah, they've got as far as you know Einstein's equations. Well, I want to put you out on one for just a

second. We've got to break to go to But we'll talk more about this and messages to extraterrestrials when we come back with doctor Paul Davies on Open mind Radio. This is Open Minds Radio here again your host UFO paranormal researcher and journalist Alejandro Rojas. Welcome back to your Open Minds Radio. We are here with doctor Paul Davies talking about some really cool stuff. We're talking about sending

messages to extraterrestrials. And before the break, doctor Davies, you were talking about sending messages in kind of our common language, which would be math and physics. So what kind of messages would you send and would it be in hopes to show them that we have an understanding of this common language. Yes, my feeling is that we should send stuff that from mathematical physics that we're

very confident about. That is not you know, this year's favor of the Month theory, that we should, for example, send the equation equals mc squared. I think it's one that you know, we're pretty confident of simple equation. Now, of course, we have to define what the terms mean,

and so there are other things that we could send. I don't want to get too technical here, but there are certain pure numbers which don't have any units attached and you don't need to define them, which would be recognized by any civilization that had got to meet moderate understanding of physics, and so these are pure numbers, would show that we have reached a certain level of development, that we understand quantum physics and atomic physics and so on, and

so I would start by sending those numbers. Now, what you have to understand here is that this isn't a lively two way conversation that's going to take place. Supposing this civilization is a thousand night years away, it's going to take a thousand years for our messages to reach them and a thousand years for

them to reply. So it's not a question of let's sit down and over the next few days educate each other into the way we think and learn each other's language, and then we can have a deeper conversation about other things that we care about, like patriotism or religion or something. You know that's never

going to happen. The only way that would ever happen is if there is some sort of alien probe in the solar system, maybe it's been sitting here for one hundred within years or something dormant, and then the speed of light issue goes away, because this probe might only be a few light minutes from us, and then it would be possible to have a conversation with the computer

on this probe. And that's what that would lead me to a question kind of A lot of the SETI folks feel that it would be impossible to break the speed of light or for something to travel physically those great distances in a

short amount of time. Do you feel right like that as well? In this game, you have to take the very best understanding of science, and our best understanding is that the speed of light is an absolute speed limit, and that whatever we discover in the future, that isn't going to change. However, as a scientist, I've learned never to use the word impossible, because of course we have no idea whether some dramatic change in our understanding may

come along in a few years time. So would be very foolish to say that the last word has been said the nature of space and time. But if we take the attitude, well, we can break all the rules of science, we can throw away the textbooks. Then we just get into idle speculation. It then becomes fairy stories where SETI tries to do science. So, in other words, why do we even think that there should be intelligent life out there in the first place. Well, that's based on our understanding

of biology. So we can't cherry pick the things we like, namely the biology, and thry out the things we don't like, namely the physics. So either we're going to be scientific about this and we take the best science to the best of our understanding and follow through its consequences consistently, or we just throw all of the science out of the window and we just tell each

other stories. But then that's pretty valueless, I think, right. And that sort of brings me to our next area of subject, which is the Vatican and their recent interest in astrobiology. And I've read some of your stories about some of the philosophical issues that their religion the document would have with the idea of extraterrestrial life. Why do you think they have such a new renewed interest in this subject. As a matter of fact, I'm lecturing about this

in Berkeley this evening, and the subject DearS in my heart. So the first thing to point out is, yes, the Vatican recently had an astrobiology meeting. I was there. It was last November. It was a straightforward scientific meeting. There was no discussion of theology, although it was convened by the head of the Vatican Observatory, and as you probably know, the Vatican Observatory is located in Arizona, so in a way this is a local story.

But the headquarter quarters are in Castel Gondolfo just outside Rome, and the Vatican Academy of Scientists, which is located in the main Vatican territory, as one of the oldest scientific academies in the world, where the meeting took place, and so there's nothing particularly unusual about the fact that they're holding scientific meetings. For example, the one they did before astrobiology meeting was about genetically modified

food. So the function of the Vatican Academy of Sciences, it is made up of non religious people as well as Catholics, is to inform the Catholic Church on scientific matters about which it might need to make policy decisions. So you see, it's all pretty straightforward. What I don't see in the Catholic Church, somewhat disappointingly, is an interest in the deep theological implications of et. For hundreds of years, there was a very lively debate in the Church

about what to do about sentium beings on other planets. And the problem is this. It's not a problem for other religions, by the way, it's not a problem for Muslims or Jews or Buddhists. The real problem for Christians in the following sense. Christians believe that God became incarnate in the figure of a human being, namely Jesus Christ, in order to save a particular species,

namely humans. So Christians don't believe that Jesus Christ came to save the chimpanzees or the whales, or the dolphins, or for that matter, the Neanderthals, who were part of the border family of Homo, but weren't the

same species as us homosapiens. And then you see the difficulty is that if there are advanced aalium beings who are ahead of us, not just scientifically and technologically, but maybe ethically as well, in some spiritual sense, are more like saintly beings than we are, are they not to be saved as well? And so there was this long debate in the church between those who wanted

multiple incarnations. As a priest a friend of mine said, God taking on different green flesh to save little green men, and those who think that there's a deep heresy that there was the incarnation as unique it happened only one species, one planet, in which case the problem is what does salvation mean for beings beyond the earth. The Church got itself in a frightful model on this, and you'll see all sorts of statements by theologians and religious scientists over the

centuries, and then it all went quiet about fifty years ago. And I think it's done the too halt basket. I'd try to kick it out of a too heart basket. I think the Church needs to face up to this and face up to it squarely. Well. Last year, and you're probably aware of this as well, the gentleman who runs the Vatican Observatory, Father Funez, he did come out with something that he wrote in the Vatican Journal that made a lot of news about our space brothers and extraterrestrials and it's okay

to believe in them, and we don't have to be fearful. And he did skirt the issue that you're speaking of now. But I did notice at least some papers and some kind of rebirth of that debate a little bit after he made that mention, right, and he was the one who convened the meeting in the Vatican, and as I said, we didn't get into the theological stuff. In my book I quote his memorable phrase, the extraterrestrial is my brother. But I you know, I have to say that he did

scare the issue. And his predecessor, father George Kaine, an old friend of mine and a wonderful astrobiologist and astronomer, I think it was a little bit more upfront. In fact, I can actually quote what he's written on this if we've just got a moment. He said, God chose a very specific way to redeem human beings. He sent his only son, Jesus to them, and Jesus gave up his life so that human beings would be saved from their sin. Okay, that's standard. Did God do this for extraterrestrials.

Theologians must accept the serious responsibility to rethink some fundamental realities within the context of religious belief. What is a human being? Jesus Christ fully a human being exists on more than one planet at more than one time. So he's raising the question in a very up from way because he's not providing us with

an answer. Right, we do have this he's compromsing it great. Yeah, we do have to take a small break right now, and then we'll come back to talk more about this really interesting and we do have a chat that goes on where we've got a couple of questions there too for you. So we'll be right back with open Minds Radio. We are with doctor Paul Davies. Stay tuned, Welcome back to open Minds Radio. Here now former official spokesperson for the Mutual UFO Network, your host of Open Minds Radio,

Alejandro Rojas, Welcome back. This is a Lejandro Rojas. You're listening to open Minds Radio and we have doctor Paul Davis on and what a great talk. This is a lot of fun and I want to let everybody know you can get his new book and his other books and see what he's up to at Cosmos dot a, s U dot ed u. The new book, I want to remind you is The Eerie Silence and his website is Cosmos dot A, s U dot edu. So, doctor Davis, I had to cut you off when you were talking about that quote, But did you get

that you know that fully out? I did, Yes, I got to the end of the quote first. So I'm simply saying that there are a handful of Christian theologians who these days are prepared to face squarely the dilemma of extraterrestrial being the problem the problem of the incarnation, which, as I remarked, is not a problem for other religions. I think, yeah, And that's why I loved reading about what you had to say about all of that

in the past, because I knew there were issues. I grew up as a Roman Catholic, and I knew those philosophies, and I hear those things here and there. You know, even within our community, people debating the philosophies behind that. So and it does seem like something that at some point they're going to really need to tackle base on, and at least they're kind

of touching upon it. Yes, I think my attitude is that if you think about all the Valley who over Darwin's theory of evolution, well they've had a few decades that sort of come to terms with that. But if we were to get suddenly evidence, incontrovertible evidence that we're not alone in the universe,

this could be very sudden and very destabilizing. And so for those people who care about the future of the Christian religion does have a prepared position of these in cases should happen now, someone asked in the Chat, and I guess I can preface this with a story from the Royal Society Astrobiological Conference,

which I know you attended as well, Nick, that one too. Yes, a friend of ours, Nick Pope, who worked for the mob investigating UFOs, was also there and he found it interesting that at lunch, and you know, on off time, a lot of these scientists really were into speculating about all the passibilities of what may be going on right now related to his work. And he found that really fun, and he was surprised how open a lot of these scientists were. Someone in the chat was asking,

did you find that same type of atmosphere at the Vatican's conference? Well, the Vatican conference was a closed conference just for astrobiologists, and I wanted to say right it outside that astrobiology is almost all not about looking for intelligent dadias. It's about whether there's microbial life or maths for example. So it's almost

all trying to understand the origin of life on Earth. It's astronomical environment, organic molecules in space, those sorts of straightforward technical things, and there was only a small components about SETI. The Conference of the Royal Society was a public conference. There was an audience and so it was not a not a closed meeting, and so for that reason there was a lot more widely varying discussion. So I think it was these raw, different sorts of meetings,

right. So you didn't find that sort of behind the scenes type of conversation at the Vatican. No, we had just ordinary scientific sessions and you know, lunches and dinners and so on. We didn't need to talk behind the scenes because we could talk openly at the meeting itself. There really wasn't an

issue. So that's what's great. That's what I love about your work is that you get more into philosophying around some of these concepts, such as what will it mean if we discover extra trestrall ha been even going further into the

possibility of intelligent extra trestural. Absolutely, that's what interests me, who always has I might say I've had an interest in searching for extra tress in intelligence ever since Frank Drake started it in nineteen sixty, So you know, I've been in the game for a long time, and I've been closely associated with the SETI program and have written about this and have held workshops at Arizona State University on this topic. And so you know, I feel I'm a whirl

wisher an occasional contributor to the subject. Right, So did Drake. It was his work that really sparked your interest. Well, Frank Drake was the pioneer who began this in nineteen sixty and I might say Fank is still in the game. I saw him recently at the London meeting. We went out

to dinner together. I dedicated my book to him. It says something about the extraordinary vision of the man that after fifty years of searching the skies hoping to pick up a message from ET and getting only an eerie silence, he's never the less upbeat about the prospects for the SETI program. So he's a

bit of a hero of mine. But the thrust of the book is, alongside doing traditional SETI looking for so called narrowband signals coming from specific sources in the sky, we should be greatly broadening the search, and earlier I talked about looking for beacons, but we could look for other things as well, signs of large scale astro engineering or only sort of anomaly in astronomy that might

stand out and might suggest that it is the footprint of alien technology. We then have to pick up a message to answer the question are we alone in the universe. We merely have to see that there's somebody out there doing something. We might not know what they're doing, but it has to be some evidence of some technology at work, and then we could proclaim that, you know, over there the particular style, in a particular direction, there is

the footprints of advanced technology. Now, someone who felt that there was already discovery of the footprint of advanced technology was Lawrence Rockefeller, when he was trying to with his initiative get the Clintons really into the subject and looking into secret documents and things like that. And we were excited to find in some pictures because we thought in this visit that the Clinton's made to one of Rockefeller's ranch,

that they were discussing this topic. And then we found some more evidence of that when in some of these pictures, Hillary Clinton is holding one of your books, the book that's correct, Yes, a book Kawi alone, which I wrote back in the early nineties. It was based on some lectures I gave in its and my first skirmish with this particular topic. And it does appear that she's carrying a copy of that book. Correct. Were you aware that the Clintons were aware of your work? No, it was news

to me when somebody sent me a copy of that picture. I haven't had an opportunity to discuss it with Hillary Clinton or anybody else. I have had some exchanges with Lawrence Rockefeller, but not in recent years. Oh great, And was he inquiring just kind of wanting to know about some of your ideas. Yes, that's right. He was just invited me to come and sit down and talk about them. But I haven't had that opportunity, I'm afraid.

Yeah, it seems like that would have been You would have been the type of person that he would want to include in a think tank over you know, the implications should he prove what he believed to be true? Yes, I'm the person. I don't deny it. Of course, I'm involved in many research projects, many the big questions. In fact, the center Iran at Arizona State University called the Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts and Science,

has his motto confronting the big Question. So we deal with not just intelligent life and space, but we deal with the origin of the universe and the origin of life, and the destiny of mankind, and time travel and space travel, and you know, a whole bunch of fun stuff. I like to say to people, we research all those things that people love to discuss at dinn about it, right, all the fun staff And speaking of someone who does the research on this fun stuff, Grant Cameron, who runs PRESIDENTIALUFO

dot com. He actually has a tight relationship with the Clinton Library, and he sent this information to the Clinton Library secretary he works with, and she sent it, I guess through a lot of Hillary Clinton's staff. So at least there's some discussion there. So hopefully you'll hear from Hillary when she's got some time. Well, that's right, it's Hillary knows my email address.

Then there's not the slightest problem I look forward to. Yeah, So when it comes to these ideas of the possibility that there is some evidence that we have intelligent extraterrestrial contact going on right now, how do you feel about some of that evidence that you've seen? Well, what I've done in the book is look at it to deal with it very carefully. I think a lot of times it's just dismissive about the whole UFO scene. And I said earlier

that SETI Signs has distanced themselves from it. Well, I knew Alan Heinek, who was head of the Chief Scientific Advisor the US Air Force Project Blue Book. I visited him at his home. I looked through many of his reports. We discussed on a number of occasions what was behind these various stories. And he was the one who coined the term close encounters of the fair

kind, right. And I investigated some reports in Britain, where I was living at the time, and I think I managed to explain some of them, and I took a great deal of interest in it. And so I deal with that in the book and I explain why I think this is a different set of problems. Right. Unlike many people, I'm not dismissive about people who make who file these reports. I don't think they just you know,

crackpots and wives. I think they have genuine experiences, right. And then people are going to have to read your book to get more information on that because we are out of time. So thank you so much for being on the show. This is really informational, a lot of fun for me. Next week we've got Robert salaz On who was at an Air Force base when nuclear missiles were shut down, when UFOs were seen over the base, so it's going to be a great show. Join us next week, and

thanks for listening to Open Minds Radio. Keep forget it smooth so much you was was your feet, the cracks and clas

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android