119: Discussing the USMC, 31st MEU CA Marines - podcast episode cover

119: Discussing the USMC, 31st MEU CA Marines

Mar 14, 202331 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Welcome to the One CA Podcast.

In this episode, Brian Hancock guest hosts and interviews Marine Maj. Rob Boudreau on his experience deploying as a CA officer with the 31 MEU. 

Brain Hancock LI: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brian-j-hancock/

Rob Boudreau LI: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rboudreau55/ 

The One CA Podcast info:

One CA Podcast email: capodcasting@gmail.com

One CA Podcast webpage: https://www.civilaffairsassoc.org/podcast

Civil Affairs Association: https://www.civilaffairsassoc.org/

The One CA Podcast is a production of the Civil Affairs Association. Thanks to Assad Raza for guest hosting and Frank Sobchak for coming on.
If you or someone you know would like to come on the show, or guest host, contact us at capodcasting@gmail.com.

Transcript

Welcome to one. See a podcast. This is Jack today. We have Brian Hancock as the guest host. Brian is interviewing Marine, Major Robert Boudreau, and attorney and civil Affairs officer who deployed with the 31st meu, being an attorney for the federal government in his civilian career, Rob.

Wanted me to note that the interview is an informal discussion that represents only his views and does not represent the views of the United States government Department of Defense. The Marine Corps or any other components. So beyond that, there's a lot of great stuff. So enjoy the show. Thank you. Mayor of Rio and again, welcome

to the show. I understand that you just recently returned the 31st meu and that's a 31st has a somewhat unusual mission that they perform for the core and also an interesting relationship with the 3rd Marine Expeditionary Force are met that they Port. Tell us a little bit about that. Yeah. Thanks Brian. Sure thing just to provide a little bit of context at the time I deployed, I was a civil Affairs Detachment Commander with fourth civil Affairs group out of Miami Florida.

So that's a reserve unit. I served there for about four years now, attached to the 31st meu, as an augment of a civil Affairs Detachment. So looking first at the 31st meu and three math, and where they fit into the competition. Continuum think it's helpful to look at the maps mission statement, which is that the MEP provides the United States with a forward-deployed force and Readiness.

In the Theater as a globally. Responsive expeditionary and fully scalable Marine, air-ground, task force, that is a magnet have capable of generating deploying and employing, forces for crisis response, forward presence, major combat operations, and campaigns remember is headquartered in Okinawa. So, when you think about what the Marine Corps is currently doing in the Pacific region,

can't ignore what that means. Per having, you know, large headquarters element out there in that strategic location. The 31st meu is similarly headquartered on Okinawa. Now for those less familiar with a magnet ask what that looks like. The mag tap is made up of an aviation Logistics, infantry combat and headquarters element. So those four elements they can come in different sizes so to speak. So we mentioned scalable, a method you're looking at like a division level.

You've got the vision level unit supporting it the next session on the load. That would be a brigade. So three Meb 3rd. Marine Expeditionary Brigade is also headquartered out there and then below that is the 31st meu. So the 31st meu has an infantry battalion in aviation Squadron illegitimate Essex baton supporting at as well as the headquarters element. So the view is also going to be paired up as an Expeditionary Unit. It's paired up with a navy, amphibious group.

So when the Navy patrols with am you attached together? Their embarked on, you know, several ships, prepared for whatever Naval operations need to be conducted. So typically a mess has three, subordinate news and run that are really high Tempo. So whereas the other Muse, typically go through a one-year period of work up Patrol, the 31st meu, does it every six months.

So you're talking really compressed timelines to get them you to integrate with the Navy presence and activity within the Pacific. So whether that means partnering with the Japanese self-defense forces to conduct training or engaging in humanitarian operations, in response to tropical storms or participating in joint. Multinational exercises, you know, at some examples, the 31st new is always ready to execute whatever mission is called for

in the moment. Now, looking for a little bit more at the 31st meu and how it views itself is considers itself. The premier crisis response force in the Pacific. Its motto is ready partner. Dat lethal. Which I think summarizes pretty much what they're trying to accomplish and how they view their their strategic importance in the world. So thinking about that phrase. Ready, partnered and lethal.

I think there's a lot you can unpack as to how the mute eyes into the National Security strategy. And as that trickles down Through the defense strategy than the Pacific strategy and the Mew is really the technical translation of what the objectives in those strategies

looks like. So as we think about what the competition landscape looks like and what it means not just for the Marine Corps, but for the United States to maintain that, persistent forward presence to build credibility in the region as a partner of choice and to be ready as a crisis response Force. The 31st meu is really the tip of the spear for the Marine Corps. Thanks for that major Bordeaux fascinating Mission and that

persistent forward presence. Since of the 31st meu, puts them in an ideal position to I was a suspect managed, the increasing number of worldwide crisis and national disasters, were having that are resulting in humanitarian, assistance

disaster relief. We could obviously drop the 82nd by are very quickly, but if we drop those army forces in there as opposed to the Marines off the Mew, they would suck resources out of the limited resources available in a crisis, whereas some you can can leave This year, do good work not been resources and then return to the ship.

So that is an increasingly critical mission that you've been part of. Can you tell us a little bit about your specific role in that mention, as well, as how you prepared in that work up or the mission? Yeah, absolutely. I'll break down the two parts of that and first talk about what the Civil Affairs mission was. So within the view in the occult a little bit informal because you know, civil Affairs is kind of a bolt on and capability in

many ways. But where we shook out as we became part of the S3 operation section and then specifically, we fell inside the operations in the information environment, the oie cell. So any effects that we saw to achieve were coordinated with the Lido.

IE Planner on my patrol, we had a major, whose chopped over to us from three Meg. That's a marine information group that sits in Okinawa that supports pre-med and then within the oie cell, we also had our public affairs, folks, or as the Marine, Corps has rebranded it strategic Communications or comps. So we had our public affairs team, as well as a technical information operations officer and a psychological operations team as well.

So when we embarked that was our unit and everything that we were looking to accomplish would go directly into the operations section and that's how we integrate across a MAG tap in addition. We also had a Space Marine. Yes, those exists. We had a Space Marine coming augment us when we're underway from space force. Looking at the 31st Muse, Mission and particularly where we think civil Affairs has a fit into the competition. Next, I knew that I'd be wearing two hats thinking about

readiness and major. Focus of the 31st meu is to certify. Every embarking subordinate unit in the ability to conduct them. Use Mission, essential tasks. So what that meant in, Practical terms for me, is that I had to be ready to be a utility player. So, within the operation section, I wear two hats, I was both we civil Affairs, planner as well as the current op so cool. Large extent as a doorknob. So, you know, I had to maintain a focus on training and operations and short window, you

know, who needs to be where? Where, where we had folks located? We need to support etcetera and then as the Civil Affairs planner, I was also responsible for, you know, keeping an eye on the world coordinating with

other units in the area. Usaid other folks things that we're going on in the Civil environment and making sure that those considerations were integrated in all aspects of planning executing both in terms of actually going on the patrol as well as training, we'll get more into that in a little bit here. So, then shifting to the second part of your question, about preparing for the deployment as many deployments go, there is nothing perfect or ideal.

Deal about it but you know Semper Gumby Marines adapt, they work, whatever they've got and they go after the mission so. Well, we were called a Detachment in the table of

organization. Realistically that just meant to packs, so it was me and a sergeant and that makes up our Detachment. So I knew from the start that if we were called on or as we were called on to execute civil, Affairs tasks, we'd be really relying on everyone else in the mag tap as well as many partners that we were able to coordinate with on the outside to be able to achieve out size effects.

And then, another interesting aspect, Was that I was paired up with a marine from a different unit, so we didn't have any experience, drilling, or conducting field exercises, any of that stuff together prior to meeting during pre-deployment training in California. So, I was paired with Sergeant Lee a Henning. She's an ncos are civil Affairs, specialist out of third, civil Affairs, group, and Great Lakes. In hindsight, it was actually terrific match.

So starting heading like every other Marine had cross-training to civil Affairs. Her prior specialty was artillery. So she understood effects up until the point of coming into civil Affairs effects for her, always understood in a kinetic context. So, what an artillery round is accomplished thing, as opposed to what effect is a particular message, having a population

group. But through that lens, she was able to integrate well with our psyop team with roie, folks looking at At achieving effects in the information environment as opposed to physical environment getting more into the specifics of work up. You know is fairly routine. You're talking going to shooting ranges, talking to the docks, making sure that your damaged or missing gear is taken care of.

But the other thing we want to do is make sure that we had a good rip the transfer of authority with the folks that we were replacing. So not only did we get on Zoom calls with the outgoing civil Affairs Detachment, I found out who the, the previous three Detachment commanders were going back foot patrols. And I reached out to every single one of them and said, hey, give me your after-action. And let me know what to expect. What are the patterns?

Like, in the new, what were the, some of the things you're able to accomplish things you left behind? What can I expect? And make sure that I'm integrated both of the battle rhythms, and can the real world as we get ready for the patrol. So a lot of information all at once, but I think some parts of it were fairly routine, but other aspects. We want to make sure that we left the Civil Affairs, footprint.

As soon as we got to the meal, I'd like to dig into the work up just a little bit more in the training, we do that a lot in both the Army and the Marine Corps, we have a number of traditional challenges that I suspect you're cracking. And when we go to us, particularly validate civil Affairs capabilities at service level and Joint little exercises. These exercises often don't contain a lot of civil Affairs, content, and typically, they lack the analytical strength and staff.

To model complex, civil systems and the resulting impacts from fires and maneuver. Did you experience this in your work up? And if so, what did you do about it in my time? At for keg, we went through the same concerns. So the CAG supports tabletop exercises in California in North Carolina to math out there at the training center in San Diego. And, as you point out, these are, these are routine problems where there's not necessarily a focus. Sure that civil Affairs is hitting their mess.

Depending on you know, how many folks we sent to support these kind of exercises often times, we're able to decide what additional training value were able to achieve on our own. You know, we're not trying to outshine anybody or anything like that. A lot of his internal and just trying to make our profession work better. But we start building those things in ourselves.

So whether it's, you know, anticipating possible, injects or creating our own internal frag owes to create our own civil considerations, those are things that we think about right from the start. So, whereas your service level or your joint folks, are Often focused on achieving Battlefield dominance or solving complex Logistics problems. Or hey, how do we integrate this new capability? We're looking early at. Hey, here's where civil Affairs are likely to plug in, in the scenario.

Here's, you know, things that we should start anticipating and let's make this more meaningful for ourselves. Even if the mag tap isn't necessarily thinking in terms of, hey, where is civil Affairs? Kind of fit and how do we make sure that those guys trained up? So to give you a real simple example, as we went through the certification exercises for them, you to be able to check the box that hey, they're ready

to go out on patrol. The Like, telling that was with us, he'll be 31. They were the lead element to conduct assessments supporting a humanitarian assistance survey team a Hast as part of a notional Disaster Response scenario during one of the certification of Illusions. So with them, you did and where VA guys take a greater role in this as we were reaching out. So, Nina Kessler usaid civil, military liaison. She works closely with the mask

with the mad with him. You we reach out to her and said, hey, would you like to participate in this, you know, can you help the new make this train more realistic and need is Tastic? No matter who she's talking to within 15 minutes, you just received a mini Jayhawk like, you know, what usaid does, you know, it does ask for responsible, collect for the US and now, you understand

specifically. Hey, here's how the military plugs in the other thing we did was we created our own scenario in Jack's. For example, we drafted for a ghost, you need to anticipate that based on the scenario. There's going to be a displaced persons problem. They're going to deal with whether that's setting up a display civilians camp or you know considering how this is going to interfere with maneuver or with other Disaster Response. You know we had Relationship working the step process.

I go to the CLD 31 top. So when I say, hey you got some down time out there in the field, consider using this, and they were grateful for that because they also understand that if we're thinking about the problems are going to face, it's going to make them more effective. If we have to conduct civil Affairs asked real world. So, by creating these in D X, we would develop our own civil Affairs concept of operations which we're kind of internal.

So when I say internal it gave us a product to share with the oie folks so near in a planning session or sending out. Augment to support the half the oie folks could look at you and say, hey now I know exactly what you're doing because I've got two here in front of me. I can take this, I can take your objectives and I could now build those into the larger oie picture and then it's also available to be disseminated to

them. You. Another thing that we touch on briefly is integration so we were lucky to have some really enthusiastic folks from the Mig that are really excited about getting out and doing things in the information environment and civil Affairs opens up a lens that often times they're not able to to use as much as they'd like because many of the authorities. At the Meg has to go through to conduct oie becomes an obstacle. You're talking multiple layers of review, authorization,

authorities, potentially. The highest levels of level of government. Civil Affairs does not necessarily have those sorts because so military operations, their inherent in any military task. So when you have somebody whose job is to think about, hey, where can we use this capability and it affects the information environment, it creates a lot of value there for the Meg.

Something I've wanted to ask you because I could see this is a risk to Mission or maybe as an opportunity, when you have an expeditionary Force, like the Marine Corps in actual terrain, where disasters and conflict happens, seems to me you could move from what started as a training mission to dealing with a real-world events. Very quickly, just just a very almost a flick of a switch. Did you experience? Is that at all in your time on the 31st meu.

How did they prepare for? What is a foreseeable potential risk to Mission? Yeah, absolutely. So we did have exactly that experience for contacts. The Muse, when they go through the certification for patrol actually go through three. Iterations of exercises do for us or certification pipeline, if you will, that cycle went over the Christmas and New Year's holidays.

And during that time, there was a real world typhoon that came up. So you already Add kind of a foundation of trust because um, you had already been through that initial step of going through variety Mission sets together and then what do you know here's a potential humanitarian disaster that we could be called on. So as you can imagine, it's going to go through the exact same steps you did in training if you did it, right? Do we train like we fight or do we fight like we trained?

You know, hopefully, we're on the right side of that equation. So for us, it was the same thing we bring in all the staff, all the planning staff. And we go through the RTP to planning process and start thinking about, hey, you know, who are we going to have to call back? Who's going on leave? Who's not on the, what is it? The asset Readiness for the Squadron, do we have all of our vehicles ready to go? What is the timeline look like? What's the the time-space distance?

How long is it going to take us to get to this particular region? So we work through it just like in training and we're going to go through all the considerations fill out the the 60 70, 80 percent solution, whatever information we have available, go through that and be ready for this potential real world mission which could interrupt the patrol cycle. But as you point out, that's why we're there to do the real world stuff, the training gets us

there and makes this more ready. But the other day with are not just two The boxes or hit the wickets. Our job is to be to be ready to respond. Something that comes to my mind, you are likely tracking in 2017, Congress passed the women, peace and Security Act and Laser DOD created implementation guidance for that in 2020. And civil Affairs has a big role in women, peace and security.

Did you do anything or your team, do anything with the women, peace and security lines of effort during the 31st news? Is deployment. And if so, could you share some lessons learned in that area for the rest of the Civil Affairs community? Absolutely, as you put it out women, peace and security is the framework for approaching vulnerable populations in general.

So the ACT focuses specifically on women and girls and a fundamental concept there is that can't achieve stability anywhere if you ignore the voices of literally half your population, if you cut the women and girls out of the conversation or you're not protecting their interests ensuring basic human rights, then you're never going to achieve lasting stability. So the Marine Corps has various

military occupations. Especially MLS codes there's additional ones within civil Affairs but for planning which is a Of course, as well as for being a female engagement officer or female engagement specialist. So I had been through the training the summer before my deployment to obtain the female engagement officer MLS. So WPS was something that was very familiar to us that pork egg. And we had all started thinking about how does this affect our mission?

What are the things we should be thinking about? So during our pre-deployment training, me and Sergeant Henning, actually assisted her with going through the training to get the female engagement specialist MOS. And I also Basically laid out as a challenge like, hey, this is, this is a real cool, evolving area of civil Affairs. You know, let's see what we can do to bring this from you and

make it part of their mission. So, what we did at the, the Mew is we basically try to find a way to make that part of the typical considerations but also to make it almost a function. So I think with this really plays out from the example of female engagement teams, as many of our listeners are going to be familiar with during the war on terror, the Army, the Marine Corps created, what we called female engagement team.

So these were Basically tailor-made, civil Affairs teams that were responsible, specifically for going out and talking to females in the village, the moms, you know, the tribal leaders wives, the girls teenagers getting information about what trying to find out what additional things are going on that. The intelligent folks weren't able to get to traditional means. But also looking specifically at what those needs were the women

were facing. That weren't necessarily being understood by military leadership. So using that model. And I talked about the Afghanistan drawdown, it's funny because female engagement team. Get a rebirth in the United States of all places with the 50,000 or so Afghan refugees that came in. So at the different bases that we had brought refugees to Fort McCoy Wisconsin Fort Lee in Virginia, Quantico at each of

those locations. There were female engagement team stood up to support the refugees. Help them through the resettlement process, addressing particular needs that were there. So what we did for them, you understand that the view is really looking at the global theater, strategic level competition. We thought that a provisional female engagement team capability would Be a good fit.

So you know, kind of the example, the technical examples I'm talking about going out and talking and finding out what the medical needs or the supply needs are in a particular Community. That's not necessarily something that the muses doing every day but it's something that needs to be ready to do. So what we did was we created an off-the-shelf basically capability for them. You and created an sop that could be used in two ways.

First of all, as a planning tool to integrate the WPS considerations in planning, but also to have put the team would look like, here's something you can actually be You every time the magnet goes out and rebuild. Team on getting a team to be used where those targeted targeted civil Affairs,

activities need to be conducted. So the SOP that we created, this is something that we actually submitted to the Marine Corps Center for Lessons Learned. So anyone with a CAC who's able to access the website can go there. And again search for 31st. Meu people to get me a team and you'll find our sop co-founder after-action from the patrol as well. But in that sop you go through

planning considerations. So a lot of these that we borrowed from NATO and then Army Publications we go line by line like hey here are the questions that you should be asking. Asking during an opt during an operational planning team meeting here are some of the considerations you should have. And then on the other side of that, it was a female engagement team. Actually going to look like as a tactically employable effective, small unit.

Well let's look at some of the considerations for selecting team members. What particular skills should we be looking at four Marines and sailors that could be called on to be part of that team? What are the training package look? Like, are the language things that we need to work through where we going to get interpreters. Do we need to do a shooting package to make sure that they're able to provide internal

security, things of that nature. So then the female engagement team would have to focus is really first being ready to conduct those tailored missions if you will. But also to integrate with the planning staff and say you're the just one considerations that you need to think about through the women, peace and security lands and we were really fortunate on the patrol. We actually got to look at this

real world. So, going back to your earlier this year, 2022 around April, I had the opportunity to participate in site surveys in the initial planning conference for exercise common dog 6, which was ultimately can Ducted in in the Philippines back in October about six months after I had the opportunity to go down. But what I did over those two weeks was I was like hey this is an opportunity to actually look

at WPS objectives, you know. So whether it's looking at hey how was the u.s. modeling integration and diversity? How will we modeling that for our partners? So at the planning conference we had folks obviously from the Philippine Marine Corps Navy. We had Marines Services represented there. We have Republic of Korea Marines who were there and then there were other nations are looking to be involved as well. So that actually gave a a practical opportunity. Like, hey, let's, let's look at

what WPS looks like. So not only are we modeling WPS and what those values look like, and she look like to the rest of the world. What can we do to encourage our partners? And so there was no template for this, but I wrote up in assessment Basically number format, here's the considerations. Here's the objectives that we're looking to achieve through the WPS for framework. You know, it's laid out, their Duty guidance, and here are my observations.

And what I did with that was I shared it with higher. So not only is it internal to the new. So it became a reference for the next Patrol. Definitely conducted the exercise, but it's something that was shocked to hire. So, like you folks are looking at activities all over the world. Here's my observations of how we did and how our partners are doing with this particular exercise. So we're actually able to push that up multiple levels all the

way up to and opaque on staff. And I think there were appreciative that honestly, folks, down to our level, we're even thinking about it. So it was well received and then in addition to that to kind of put the bow on what we try to accomplish during our Patrol Sergeant heading and I co-wrote a paper see mobile engagement teams and what sustaining that really looks like in a competition text.

And we're looking forward to that being published in the January 20, 23 edition of the Marine Corps Gazette, great material. I look forward to reading some of those articles myself. I believe you and start heading a publishing several to Aid to One thing I always have to ask, of course, touches on assessments. This is a very hot area for Department of Defense. And historically, civil Affairs has struggled to deliver scientifically valid measures of effect that this Fair number of

measures the performance. But measures of Effectiveness has been somewhat Elusive and it's a complicated problem, set involving collection, analysis and elements of presentation. Can you tell us what type of assessment you were able to conduct in the 31st meu and what do you see as Is the next step in moving. The science of see a Mo E forward. Absolutely.

And thinking about, you know, looking specifically at civil Affairs, one of the constant struggles is trying to determine realistic and useful measures of performance. You know, that's your data that your raw data, what do we actually accomplishing? What are we getting out? Is our messaging getting out, are we conducting a sufficient

number of engagements? We actually doing things, we need to be doing and then coupled with that, is that the measures of Effectiveness which feeds into assessments? Like not only, are we doing the tasks that we're order to do and we're trying to do effectively, but are we Publishing the ultimate objective. What is it at the end state that

we're trying to reach? So I think one of the things we always struggle with is, especially with typical deployment Cycles as you're looking at shortened time Horizons. So for us, it's a six-month Patrol. What can we realistically expect for particular activities that we're doing?

Are we taking the right view of what we're doing and what we can accomplish, when you think about the information environment, you're really talking about influencing hearts and minds and probably getting folks, to understand what we're trying to accomplish, and are they actually coming on board with that Shiva? We wanted to, I think what? That translates down to for civil Affairs is not just about collecting data, but you need to look at Trends over a period of

time. When you think about, you know, to give a simple example, you know, taking an assessment framework, where you're looking at, did we achieve the objective? We are looking to do, you know, breaking down a problem set, applying a civil Affairs lens and then try to understand whether you're achieving the objectives that you want. Being a specific example. Like bombed-out power plants in particular area, you know, are

we getting electricity on? Mine, are we measuring that in terms of dollars, spent for local community? Get a certain number of kilowatts pumped out this particular Community. Okay? That's that's a nice data point. But are we achieving the longer-term objectives? It's hard to put a scientific brand of her stamp of approval, if you will all that, because a lot of that is kind of softer skills.

That's a lot of what civil Affairs deals with a soft skills, as much as we'd like to use that data analytics driven stuff. Sometimes we know what right looks like through experience. Here's how we know we're being effective in this particular area because our partners invited us back and a lot of those effects that you're looking at is getting translated up over time to things that have

strategic level impact. So I understand that I'm kind of giving you a shotgun answer to your question, but for us when the Civil Affairs community, and I think kind of always working through those, you know, fundamentals and making sure that you're capturing what you're doing. Turning it over to the folks who were placed you and making sure that information is disseminated being analyzed and then pushing enough higher where appropriate, those are the kind of realistic

expectations. I think from a Marine Corp. Effective, trying to make sure that our measures of Effectiveness are being met. And then over time, if a process of being followed, right? Your assessments are going to build off that, where you going to be able to see. This is what the objective was. Here's the exercise timeline, here's the things, we're trying to accomplish. Hey, here's what this community looks like nowadays, here's what's happening when we want to go and do things there?

Here's their attitudes, things like that. You got to look at it from a whole lot of mgtow, of whole of

service, every environment. Every domain approach, it's going to matter what cam straps doing, it's going to matter what, you know, our You folks are doing, we're going to have to take all that information into account when you're when you're ultimately going through the assessment process and seeing if you've been effective assessments are just a very thorny problem, but funding now is often tied with demonstrating return on investment through assessment.

I so I suspect will be returning to this conversation many times in civil Affairs. One of the perennial problems. Of course, is, if one appointment, produces some civil effects, it sometimes takes years to fully realize the potential of that. Years later, the follow-on units don't assess. Oftentimes what was done by previous units. We don't have that continuity for long-term assessments when we need to figure out that you, that better I think is an Enterprise within Department

defense. I have one last question for you, one of the third novel things. The Marine Corps has done is they've done some key Investments of tanks and other assets to build new formations aligned to the realities of Modern Warfare, particularly in us and opaque on one of the innovations that they've come up with. With is the Marine littoral regiments or mlr. And they have a new operating concept called expeditionary, Advanced base operations.

He ABO, what do you see from your Foxhole as the role of civil Affairs in the mlr as well as within the E ABO contract? Sure thing and to lean on another weak analogy, but common phrases. We're building. The airplanes were flying it, right. So we have the doctrine. We've got all these things that

are coming out, right? The naval operating concept forces on 2030 ebo, so, yeah, lots of learning going on at all levels of the Marine Corps civil Affairs, especially recognize when we have such a tiny footprint. I think the most important thing from my perspective for civil Affairs is that the small unit training is where it's going to

have kind of an outsized impact. So when you're looking at Get operations, you're talking about, potentially to squad team size elements and diverse locations. How do you make sure that those folks are conducting civil military operations to the extent? They need to to make themselves more effective. Well it's gonna depend on that smallest unit trainings, just to put a fine point on it. I can tell you right now every infantry battalion out there every test for officer.

Their supply guys are all thinking about, hey, how am I going to get stuff to my guys in the field when they going to be kind of left on their own to deal with and inevitably, what that means is that hey there's going to be a lot of activity. That civil environment. Do they have the tools that they need? Are they able to interact the way that they need to? Are they getting the information about the Civil environment that they need to?

So, there's a lot of layers on that and it's going to be tons. And tons of really good work that civil Affairs folks are going to be able to provide support those missions as they come up. But in addition to that, it puts the onus on civil Affairs, folks, to make sure that the training is getting out so that we've got a small contingent of civil Affairs, Marines, they can't be everywhere at once.

How do I make sure that this specialized capability Is being executed and is available to the small unit that's in a distance location that I'm not able to get to right away. So, I think there's three kind of legs to this. First of all, you've got your preparation of the battlespace, right. You've got ipb intelligence prep, well, feeding into that, as your symbol preference battle space. So thinking about who the players in the area, what are the people groups?

What are the languages? Was the economy look like, what are those really important factors that are going to matter to distributed units? Or do they need to be ready for? So that's step. One is not only going to get a break from the to, but we need to make sure that civil affairs. What considerations are being built into that product, into that information is disseminated on top of that, we want to make sure that people are understanding civil military

operation tasking. So just because you're sending a team out to do whatever mission. That may have kinetic aspects. You also need to be aware that they're in a civil environment. Now, it's on that small unit leaders to understand what civil Affairs tasks. He may be required to accomplish the making sure that that's understood by the staff and is built into the orders development process. And then finally, I already had on this training is going to be

everything. Making sure that that folks are Are are ready to execute when the time comes. I'm standing download. I am smarter by the minute, listening to you. Tell us how you have succeeded in the mission set that you're provided giving the audience, a number of things to think about, as well as some documents that have been published and our upcoming Publications.

If they want to review more, appreciate everything that you're doing for us. We got to remember that we're one team, doesn't matter what uniform you wear. We always do everything joint combined. Thanks for coming on the show today. Number five, I really appreciate it, guys. Thanks for listening to the one. See a podcast, your guest host today was Brian Hancock, who interviewed Robert Boudreau will have their information in the show notes.

Additionally, we have more marine and see interviews coming up. So stay tuned and please subscribe. Like, share, tell all your friends. This is Jack have a great day. Thanks for listening to the one. See a podcast, your guest host today was Brian Hancock, who interviewed Robert Boudreau will have their information in the show notes. Additionally, we have more marine and see interviews coming up. So stay tuned and please subscribe. Like, share, tell all your

friends. This is Jack have a great day.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android