Support for the show comes from Farragamo. A century ago a shoemaker in southern Italy had a vision to marry abstract art with high quality craftsmanship, and that led them to create beautiful, timeless footwear. Today the name Farragamo is synonymous with luxurious shoes and accessories and for more than a decade Farragamo footwear has been made with an ethical supply chain and sustainable footprint. Their classic ballerinas or contemporary moccasins are a perfect blend of fashion and comfort.
Kara Swisher has a pair of both and I bought them. Discover Farragamo's timeless styles with a modern touch at Farragamo.com. Have a question or need how to advice? Just ask Meta AI. Whether you need to summarize your class notes or want to create a recipe with the ingredients you already have in your fridge, Meta AI has the answers. You can also research topics, explore interests, and so much more.
It's the most advanced AI at your fingertips. Expand your world with Meta AI. Now on Instagram, WhatsApp, Facebook, and Messenger. Hi everyone from New York Magazine in the Vox Media Podcast Network. This is On with Kara Swisher and I'm Kara Swisher. Today we've got part two of our crazy week in politics, the Money Talk. President Biden's decision to drop out was about AIDS, sure.
But it was also about dollars and cents, which is what all campaigns are really about. Big donors have been closing their wallets. Some fundraisers were being cancelled and others backfired. Like when George Clooney held one and then wrote an op-ed, telling Biden to save democracy by signing out.
Many people in Silicon Valley have been expressing worries to me over the last few weeks too. Especially because Trump seemed to have recruited some of the Silicon Valley bad guys like Elon Musk to raise money for him. And they felt overwhelmed. Well, the dog days are over. Kamala Harris's presidential campaign announcement triggered a blue tsunami of donations, $81 million in the first 24 hours to her campaign, not to mention the packs and super packs.
A lot of small donations, but also big money, especially from Silicon Valley and Hollywood. And yes, Clooney has endorsed Kamala too. Presidential candidate Harris held her first campaign event in Milwaukee on Tuesday and even her stump speech sparkled with California gold. So Wisconsin, today I ask you, are you ready to get to work? Do we believe in freedom? Do we believe in opportunity? Do we believe in the promise of America? And are we ready to fight for it?
And when we fight, we win! God bless you! God bless United States people! And in case you don't know, that song is freedom from Beyoncé. Queen B is letting Harris use it throughout the campaign, unprecedented for her. Read the lyrics, that's all you need to know. Today we're going to talk to two reporters who have been following the money and Harris for some time and know their stuff.
New York Times campaign finance reporter Teddy Schleiffer, who used to work for me and Wall Street Journal Business and Politics reporter Emily Glazer. We'll talk about who's writing checks or zelling or venmoing and what the big guns hoped to gain. Of course, we'll talk about the rash of tech titans, Elon Musk and Company, who are endorsing and supporting the Trump campaign.
And I want to ask them about the GOP's threats to sue Kamala Harris for using Joe Biden campaign funds, which seems like desperate nonsense. She was on the ticket boys. Plus, what other celebs looking at you Taylor Swift could jump on the Harris bandwagon? And what song she might give Kamala Harris? My choice, no, it's not. Haters gonna hate hate hate from Shake It Off. But of course, the man. Emily and Teddy, thanks for joining us on on. Thanks for having me. Good to be here.
So, okay, the news week is obviously President Biden dropping out of the race and endorsing vice president Kamala Harris. There are a lot of people saying money was a huge part of that decision. Money always is a huge part of the decision. So let's talk about money, which is what you guys expertise is. The Harris campaign announced it raised 81 million in Kamala Harris's first 24 hours as candidate. That was just her fund.
A flagship Super PAC future forward raised $150 million in commitments for her in the same period. There are other groups too. Emily and Teddy, you fault campaign finance and Kamala Harris for years. Were you surprised or did you immediately see dollar signs for Harris after Biden's announcement? Why don't you start Emily?
I was not surprised at all. So let's just go back to Biden's disastrous debate performance. There were already Kamala Harris allies and donors kind of quietly rallying behind the scenes for weeks. And a number of them had made their frustrations clear to Democrats, to Chuck Schumer, to Hakim Jeffries, to Nancy Pelosi, basically saying we're not going to give money to Biden. We're not going to give money to you guys.
And we're not going to give money to down ballot races unless there's a change with the Democratic presidential candidate. So they were already signaling that. And we knew even back to July 3rd, there was a whole memo about how to get Harris onto this ticket. There was a lot going on behind the scenes. Harris did a pretty good job and staying away from that, trying to kind of keep her profile low.
But you better believe those donors and supporters were getting those wheels turning for weeks with her cooperation or not just on their own. As far as I know, it was a little removed from her. And I think they were very careful to do that. She was obviously out there supporting Joe Biden fundraising for their combined ticket. But there was this memo that Lee Teddy is reported on this too.
It was an 11 page memo about how to get Kamala Harris to the ticket, why she is the right person. And that was shared with a number of donors and other supporters. And that was roughly two weeks ago, right, Teddy? And the author of that. We still we still we still never wrote that. Do you have? I wish I knew. Yeah, it would be great if like right here would be like, Oh, do you know? Do you know? No one I don't know. I don't think anyone really.
I don't I also don't think it's one person, by the way. I think it could be like a combo Google doc. Sure. You know, it was called the case for Kamala. Yeah, I remember I first saw it like couple days after it was fast. And it spread fast too. I remember everyone everyone sharing it into one of these. They love to show their work. But go ahead. It's just it's just one of these. It wasn't purely to show the work though is also to sort of like just change the narrative, right?
I mean, for the entire Biden Harris administration, you know, she's been this kind of beleaguered or perceived as a cup of leaguered politician who you know is. Can't hold a candle to Joe Biden or Donald Trump or the Gretchen wetmer, you know, choose your replacement candidate. And you know, I think that memo actually did begin to change the narrative among elites at least about whether or not she was the best person for the job.
Did you have a sense of who would be Colleywood Silicon Valley who I mean, I think she has pretty I would say she has like solid relationships everywhere, but not fantastic relationships anywhere. You know, look, I mean, she's obviously been in public life for like 20 or 30 years at this point. Everyone knows her. She was a senator from the largest state in the country.
I think among major donors, she at least right now. She's benefiting from the fact that she's the other option, right? Democrats have been so downtrodden for so long. There's optimism for the first time. I want to pop in there. I was looking back to 2020 Teddy and I have both covered this for you know, quite some time. And I found this article from OK, I wrote it. I'll be honest. I found an article I wrote from from 2020.
It was when Harris was named as Biden's VP pick. And she brought out major Hollywood names. We've got Mindy Kaling and Reese Witherspoon and Shonda Rhyme co chairs for her for solo fundraiser. Billy Porter was singing at a fundraiser sterling K Brown and Kate Hudson are there. So we've got a number. Oh, and Ken Burns. You've got like high brow low brow medium brow. You've got a lot of Hollywood support for her. And let's not forget.
She and Doug M. Hoff live in Brentwood. They're on the West side. They've got their relationships. We're going to get into the most because I think you're absolutely right. I've been to many events with her and she does know everybody and is there they love are the kind of thing. It's interesting.
And one of the first interviews I ever did with Lorraine Powell jobs the very first one. She asked me she was nervous because she'd never done an interview. And she said, can I bring a friend to the on stage at our event our code event. And I said, really? Come on. I remember this. It's Kamala Harris. And I'm like, OK, you can bring your friend. So so we often see donations surges though after news events. The campaigns release new campaign filings last week.
How does it compare to other news events? Did Kamala beat the money that Trump campaign pulled in after the felony conviction or the assassination attempt? Teddy first and then Emily. Yeah, I mean, my recollection is that, you know, Trump raised somewhere in the 50 million hour neighborhood after his conviction. I mean, this is this is double that and it's only recording Tuesday morning here.
I mean, look, I mean, I think Democrats have spent the last couple of weeks being despondent and withholding money. So, you know, I'm curious what the net benefit here would have been as if, you know, in the alternate planet earth where Joe Biden isn't bombed that debate. So some of this money is just kind of making up for the last couple of weeks. But it's clear. I mean, I mean, every Democrat major donor, small dollar donor, you know, person, you know, next door is excited for this to be over.
Frankly, I don't necessarily even know if it's like explicitly Kamala. It is much as it is just like, thank God we're done with the last couple of weeks. I would add that I agree with a lot of Teddy saying I also do think for a number of women donors and especially very wealthy women. This is a historic moment. And so, within an hour of Joe Biden exiting the race, I was chatting with the Democratic donor strategist who is on a Zoom call with all these like, we call them the wealthy LA women.
And they were plotting out their next steps of how they were going to do anything they could to support Harris. So I do think that gender can play a role here for her benefit. And then of course, other constituencies, we know in a memo that Harris's team sent to donors and other supporters on Sunday that they were touting that she can reach women voters. She can reach black voters, Latino voters. She can reach, you know, LGBTQ community.
So that is a talking point for them. And I think one that's so far we're seeing play out. Well, it's interesting. I've seen it was at, I think it was a Neil Dash said the Desiante Network was suddenly in hyperdrive. And that certainly I've gotten 20 or 30 gay network things like crazy. All of a sudden, which is interesting. And she has a very tight relationships in that community. I was just going to say the last fundraiser that Harris did for Biden, I believe, was in Provincetown.
In P-town, we know who's there. Pete Buttigieg was with her. Yeah. You know, there's a lot of, there's a lot of donors especially in California who are female who are excited about Harris. You know, Carrie mentioned Lorraine Powell jobs, right? I mean, Lorraine and Harris is probably no closer relationship in politics than Lorraine has in Connola Harris. I remember that code interview. I remember, I remember the genuine affection the two of them had on stage.
And you know, I think there's an expectation that, you know, yeah, sure, Lorraine Powell jobs is excited about Joe Biden. She would have voted for Joe Biden in the privacy of her own voting booth. But she has not been very involved in the Biden campaign. Could she get more involved? You know, there's lots of women who kind of rose up with her in California politics who are about her age, who Joe Biden has not made enthusiastic about the ticket.
And, you know, I think a lot of those people could be supporters. Let's get into tech about where the money's coming from. Connola Harris, as you said, is from California, which is home to two huge bastions of Democratic support Hollywood and tech. They've been drying up for Biden, definitely in tech and definitely in Hollywood after the George Clooney op-ed. The mega donors were among those calling for him to drop out.
What role Emily, do you think it played in the decision that he didn't have these relationships and these were really big donors? And you could imagine a tric-a of, or actually more people, if you're speaking of just women in tech is Mackenzie Bezos, Melinda Gates, Lorraine Powell jobs, the Wajiski sisters, etc. I think that it hurt Biden tremendously. I remember hearing from some folks at one point that they did a fundraiser and Marissa Mayer was the person there.
And then you compare that with Trump, who's got, as we know now, Elon Musk, and a bunch of other really big name venture capitalist, Mark Andreessen, Ben Horowitz, and others, folks at Sequoia. So it seemed for some weeks now that Elon Musk was really bringing a lot of the Silicon Valley kind of power money within minutes of Biden's announcement that he was dropping out Reed Hoffman endorsed her.
And then we saw Ron Conway endorsing Harris on Monday. You know, her ties began during the time when she was San Francisco district attorney that's going back to 2004. You can't replace, you know, 20 years of home court advantage in some ways. And so I think that's going to help her. Well, one thing is Ron is very connected, much more so. I mean, Elon Musk, the David Sags put out, that's the group of them. That's it. That's the gang.
I don't think there's anybody in Silicon Valley that has not received an all caps email from Ron Conway vacationing somewhere in Europe over the last couple of weeks. He's been very active by and explain who he has Teddy explain who he is. Sure, he is, you know, I think in a lot of ways, the OG, like, you know, tech power broker, at least of the 21st century, you know, mile minute, you know, shoot first aim later, sort of person in terms of his kind of political activity.
But he's he's powerful. I mean, he's muscular. He gets gets stuff done. And Conway, you know, was ready to back. And the note is to talk about the node goes for those who don't know is another very big, very big. And your cap was very wealthy, although he's still calling for an open convention. And I know what I put Mark Pinkis, the former CEO of Zenga in there too, who also is saying that he wants an open convention.
And so I do still think there are two camps out there. And I've heard this from some of Kamala's biggest supporters. There are people that have hopped on the bandwagon right away. They were ready. And then there are those that are saying, let's have an open convention. We want this to play out so that people can really see who the party wants. Even if it does turn out to be her, they want it there to be a process.
Whereas the other camp is like, we got to get this show on the road. Clock is ticking. Let's move forward. And last night we actually saw she's got the delegate count. Yeah, though, I do think Emily that the recording this Tuesday morning, like the even the moment behind the open convention group has wilted away.
Like an open convention or at least a competitive primary requires other people to run. And when if a node was saying don't jump on the Harris bandwagon immediately, that was Sunday afternoon when we thought maybe someone also had run. But then over the next 24 hours, we've seen this incredible. I don't know if you want to call it, you know, resignation or something more active, you know, respect for the vice president, but there's no one's been eager to challenge her.
And now I think we're speaking to see any donor, any donor who who did not want Harris to be the nominee has folded because she is going to be the nominee and that's reality. Is there anyone with financial prowess? I mean, I was joking about Dean Phillips because he's so thirsty, but, but is there anybody? My issue when they were talking about that was like, who's going to raise money like her? Like, I don't know Emily. I mean, I don't see anybody.
I mean, one question mark is Michael Bloomberg that's just like one big money person, but we did see Georgian is son Alex Soros, major, major democratic donors and Doris Kamala on Sunday. So, I mean, she is getting a lot of the big name people to Teddy's point. I will add like we also saw a lot of the politicians that would have potentially been the contenders endorsing her.
We've got Brett and Whitmer of Michigan, Westmore of Maryland, Andy Bashir of Kentucky, Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania. So a lot of the people that would have potentially been in opposition already have endorsed her. Right. They have been meeting with those donors. Trust me. They've asked me for their phone numbers. No, not giving me to them. Teddy, put these donors in perspective.
How important are these donors compared to those other groups? Emily mentioned the fundraisers at folks on women, Latinos, unions, etc. The small money donors. And sometimes Scott calls himself a dolphin. He gives a lot of money, but not the whales, essentially. Can you put those three groups in perspective? Sure. I mean, the folks who could give, you know, in the post-19 era who can give seven or eight or, you know, frankly, even a nine figure check.
I don't want to say there are, you know, the people in the smoke filled room, though the events of the last week might contribute to that stereotype. But those people have a lot of influence, right? I mean, when they're out there saying it's Kamala Harris, Kamala Harris, Kamala Harris, if you're Westmore or Gretchen Whitmer, you know, who would have to raise money on your own,
you can read Twitter. You can read the T-Leaves. You can see the fact that, you know, they're not going to be running to endorse you. And, you know, that's going to create a huge, disincentive to run. So I think that these people have an enormous amount of kind of agenda setting power. You know, I think whether or not they have power when these people are actually elected, whether they're a whale or a dolphin or whatever, you know, aquatic species you want to be.
And that's less clear to me. I think some of that statement, some of that kind of rhetoric around money and politics, I feel, from my reporting is overstated about sort of the quid pro quo. But certainly, the last couple of weeks confirm the idea that Democratic donors have the ability to possibly at least influence the outsting of a presidential nominee and to clear the field for somebody else.
And Cara, one of the interesting things in the aftermath of this is Biden, who is not the world's greatest populace has been very bitter toward all these mega donors for what he sees as them forcing him out of the race entirely. You know, Ron Claim, I thought was interesting in one of the first comments. One of the first comments, he's like going after all these big donors, these big donors like played a role in Joe Biden becoming Democratic nominee in 2020, winning the election in 2020.
And now, you know, he's talking like Trump, he's talking like, you know, these evil rich people are forcing him out of the race. It was a spicy tweet. I was like, drop the spicy what's going on. But Emily, is that they think Biden couldn't win and she can or is it more about business friendly tech policy? Was it the age thing that Harris is better for, you know, tech titans and Hollywood people? What was their motivation from your perspective?
I'd say a little bit of everything Cara. So, you know, the Wall Street Journal, my colleagues reported more than a month ago about Biden's mental acuity and major problems that lawmakers were seeing a few weeks ago, we wrote about how this really went back about two years. And there were a number of situations where donors were in settings with Biden. And they thought he was just having a bad day.
They didn't see him enough to feel like they that, oh, that stumble or he couldn't remember the word for fax machine or he couldn't remember the word for veteran or he needs to read from a teleprompter for his fundraisers. What's going on? Why did he stumble? And all of a sudden, seemed like a lot of things seem to click into place. And I believe that the debate was like the final straw.
As we know, there were concerns, you know, around the midterms and questions about whether Biden would run again. I've talked to some donors that said they tried to, you know, raise alarms. We know obviously the whole Dean Phillips thing. But I think that they just didn't have the confidence and Biden anymore and worried as Trump was also gaining momentum at the same time.
Right. Daddy, what was your perspective? Is what was there was there a biggest thing? Did they think she's going to be nicer to tech or media or anybody or business? Because you saw David Zazov say, I don't care who wins. I just want no regulation. Cara, how much does Lena Khan come up in every conversation for you? I feel like when you talk with business executives, they talk as if Lena Khan is president of the United States.
They talk as if she's effective too, which I was like, she clearly is in the psyche of every major business leader. And, you know, obviously people aren't titled to their disagreements with Lena Khan. But I've been, you know, I think for anti-Biden donors, a lot of this comes back to this belief that, you know, their industry is kind of being too regulated, M&A is too hard, yada yada.
And my question for them going forward would be like, do you really think Harris administration is going to be any different? She's running on a ticket with them and yes, sure, she might have some better personal relationships with some individual people. But one interesting question for me going forward is to what extent Harris tries to distinguish herself from Biden, which is obviously going to be difficult given, you know, the same people and the same administration.
And, you know, Harris is going to be running to a lot of the Biden record. Yeah, I've spent a lot of time with her talking about it. I think she's more capitalist than Biden, less populist, that's for sure. But I do think she's very aware we had a long talk about AI. She does a lot of like checking around and Biden, of course, doesn't, right? I never heard from Biden. I heard from her many times about those things.
I mean, Kamala is known for major prep work here, but I would also just go back to 2020 again when Joe Biden announced Harris as his VP pick. And she pointed to her tough on banks record and much of Wall Street cheered anyway. You know, there were, she has a lot of big supporters in business and finance. And I think then they expected her to have a moderate voice. You know, we've got Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders at that time where people weren't sure who Biden would put on the ticket.
And I do still think that that carries through four years later, where a number of people and finance expect her to be moderate. But Kamala Harris spoke at the campaign head course of Monday. Let's listen to a clip. So in the next 106 days, we have work to do. We have doors to knock on. We have people to talk to. We have phone calls to make and we have an election to win.
And let's talk about the phone calls you reported that she and second gentleman Doug M. Hoff, who is very well liked, let me just say, and is a very likable person held private conversations with donors that sent out a document to supporters that highlighted some of her accomplishments as VP. Can you talk, tell us more about the letter and if she's so well connected. Why do this? Why does she need to make her case?
Well, look, I think that if anybody is a politician, they're going to make sure they reach out to their big time donors as everything's going down. So we know that they were having these private conversations over the weekend, kind of letting people know that she is ready. And in some cases, these conversations were before Biden then came out to also endorse her. So this is a lot of this is happening in real time.
And then her team, you know, on Sunday is circulating this memo, a pretty detailed memo, making the case for why she should be the Democratic presidential nominee. And it literally says she is VP Harris is ready to earn and win the Democratic nomination. That is like the tagline I think that they want to keep using earn and win. We'll be back in a minute. Support for this podcast comes from Huntress.
If you're a small business owner, then the threat of hackers isn't just a threat. It can affect your livelihood. Small businesses are easy targets for hackers and hundreds wants to give businesses the tools to help. Huntress is where fully managed cybersecurity meets human expertise. They offer a revolutionary approach to manage security that isn't all about tech. It's about real people providing real defense.
When threats arise or issues occur, their team of seasoned cyber experts is ready 24 hours a day, 365 days a year for support. They provide real time protection for endpoints, identities and employees all from a single dashboard. It's because their cutting edge solutions are backed by experts to monitor, investigate and respond to threats with unmatched precision. Now you can bring enterprise level expertise without needing a massive IT department.
Huntress can empower your business as they've done for over 125,000 other businesses. Let them handle the hackers so you can focus on what you do best. Visit Huntress.com slash carrot to start a free trial or learn more. Have a question or need how to advice? Just ask meta AI. Whether you want to design a marathon training program that will get you race ready for the fall, or you're curious what planets are visible in tonight's sky,
meta AI has the answers. Perhaps you want to learn how to plant basil when your garden only gets indirect sunlight. Meta AI is your intelligent assistant. It can even answer your follow-up questions, like what you can make with your basil and other ingredients you have in your fridge. Meta AI can also summarize your class notes, visualize your ideas, and so much more. The best part is you can find meta AI right in the apps you already have. Instagram, WhatsApp, Facebook, and Messenger.
Just tag meta AI in your chat or tap the icon in the search bar to get started. It's the most advanced AI at your fingertips. Expand your world with meta AI. What if you could remember everything? Everything you said, everything you did, everything other people said, and did around you, everything you ate, everything you watched, everywhere you went. What if you could remember all of it?
On this episode of The Vergecast brought to you by Meta, we explore how AI might make that possible, and what it might mean to be a person in a world where nobody forgets anything ever again. That's The Vergecast, anywhere you get podcasts. So Teddy, the entertainment industry is important. You have Julie Louise Riphus, who's actually very active politically.
Selena Meyer becoming a meme. Maya Rudolph, getting more SNL cameos. Beyoncé is giving Kamala permission to use her song, Freedom during the campaign, which is huge. Emily is written about Harris bringing in Hollywood cash. How are her contacts? Talk about Doug M. Hobsh role here, because for people who don't know, he's a former entertainment media lawyer. He's got a lot of ties in Silicon Valley and Hollywood. Let me say he is just a delightful man. Everybody likes Doug M. Hobsh, essentially.
That goes a long way. I'll tell you that. Yeah, big guy in the Washington social scene too. I feel like you can't show up at a party and not say Doug M. Hobsh. I know, he's always there. He obviously also would be make some history. He's Jewish and he could be the first Jewish spouse of a president. There's a Jewish general community that I think M. Hobsh would cultivate during this campaign. He has also.
Yeah, right. The names in Hollywood that come up, you mentioned some of them. I would even talk about some executives like Dana Walden, who is close with Harris. I'm very curious about what role Jeffrey Katzmann-Riegplays going forward. What happens with him? I ran into him at one of some of the White House correspondents dinner parties. He was all in on Biden, riding with Biden. I think it was nervous. He had a nervous feel about it, for sure.
But he of course delivered the news to Biden. And Jeffrey Katzmann-Riegplays a long time in Hollywood, mogul, essentially, he's worked at many places. But it was really spearheading a lot of this. You can argue he's almost doing this full time or quasi full time. He's not just the finance series, a national co-chair of the campaign, which is up there with like, Gretchen Whitmer and traditional politicians.
Then you have this kind of business executive. And Katzmann-Riegplays has taken a tremendous amount of incoming over the last couple of weeks from major donors. People who feel that he gaslit them or even lied to them about Biden's mental state. Because over the last year or two, Katzmann-Rieg invited lots of major donors to the White House, spend time with Biden yourself and you'll see how good he is. You'll see there's nothing to worry about.
Now, I don't think all that criticism of Katzmann-Riegplays is fair. He'll still eat lunch in Hollywood just fine. But he is a Biden guy. And it's going to be interesting to see whether or not he is vocally pro-Harris. I will say, at least as of this recording, he's been pretty darn quiet over the last 48 hours. I don't think he said anything and people have asked. Trust me. Oh, okay. All right. I think he's been pretty darn quiet for weeks, actually.
For weeks, yeah. He wants to get away. I definitely know. Yeah, I think he's going to like hold off on his, I don't know whether it's like the polo bar or what. I feel like his lunch reservation is going to be a little bit quiet. That's exactly right. Yeah, I wrote him a Hey Girl text. I was like, Hey Girl. And then nothing. He's usually very valuable as a person. So, last thing on Kamala, we're seeing these coconut tree memes on TikTok, which I love.
Obviously, the Republicans tried to get her with coconut tree. It's turned into everybody loves Kamala and our coconut tree, which was a mistake. When they started that, I was like, No, no, this is great. Good content. This is really good. But Charlie XCX Kamala is the brat endorsement, which nobody understood except for the right people. I think it's Kamala is brat, by the way. I think you are. Yes.
And I still don't know what that means. Just to be clear, she's cool. She's cool. She's proud. She's proud. She's got. Carrie, we got your kids on the, on the part of the auction. It's better. Well, you know, they'll see there. My, my one son is voting for the first time and he likes her. But these are great rallying for Gen Z and getting them excited about it. Do you think that will translate into dollars or do we need Taylor Swift to enter the scene immediately?
Yeah. Look, I think it, it does not hurt at all. And she's got this celebrity and influencer following back in the 20th round. I was going to say Ariana Grande, Demi Lovato, like they were going to her fundraisers. And so I think, look, there were close to 900,000 grassroots donors from that 24-hour period where when Harris raised 81 million. So we can't discount people that are just kind of your average individual.
And I think there was a really big portion of them. 60% Act Blue said made their first contribution of the 2024 cycle. So I don't think we can discount the power of celebrity, the power of influencer, the power of getting Gen Z to the ballot box. That's something that has always been whether they're called Gen Z or whatever generation it is. It's always been hard to get younger voters. And that's definitely a big time thing, both for Harris and Trump.
The Democratic talking point that sprung up out of nowhere over less 48 hours is that, you know, Harris is the youngest presidential candidate in the race. She's not quite Gen Z, but far from it. Not yet 60, close. Sure. But, you know, I mean, it's interesting to see Democrats try to appeal to younger voters and use age as the argument, which is obviously a total 180 from where they were 72 or 96 hours ago.
Look, I mean, clearly, Joe Biden was not going to be the favorite candidate of, you know, the cool and hip people of Hollywood or the cool and hip people of Silicon Valley or the cool and hip people anywhere. And for Democrats, you know, I think Harris just offers a refresh broadly. This is literally a bullet point on the memo that they circulated. I'm just going to read it to you guys.
Quote, she represents the next generation of the Democratic Party and can make the issue of age and fitness a liability for Trump. Right. When I read that, I was like, oh my God, we are, we've twisted this already. This is wild. She's very fit. She's very fit and energetic. But in terms of who the most important celebrities are, again, I'm going to ask about Taylor Swift. Is there any celebrity? Is it George Clooney? Is it Beyonce? Who does move things?
I mean, I think it's Taylor. I think that she is like the one person everyone's wondering what will happen. Teddy, I'm curious what you think. I'm the wrong person to ask because I'm voting for River Taylor Swift tells me to. But look, I think Swift is somebody who has been obviously not that political until, really, her regrets after 2016. And then, you know, I remember she did that tweet about vote.org a few years ago that really got people to register to vote.
She's one of the few people kind of totally break through here. Clooney, you mentioned Kara. Clooney this morning, I don't know if you saw this a half hour ago, said he's endorsing Kamala. And of course, he played this key role in kind of the damn breaking open against Biden a few weeks ago. So, Holly was going to come back to the table. I mean, I think there's the Biden campaign clearly wants to remind people about how disruptive the Trump presidency was the first time.
And the question is, can Harris make it clear enough to Hollywood and to every influencer out there, whether in music or sports or culture, just, you know, remember how bad the Trump presidency was? That's going to be the message they're delivering. Obviously, this is happening against the backdrop of a slew of tech, bro, shifting the resources to the Trump campaign. Let's move on to Trump and his gang.
You reported on this Emily, a junior team reported last week that Elon Musk said he'll commit $45 million a month to new pro Trump super PAC. Talk to us about the America PAC and he's denied it kind of. I'm not sure he knows everything. Not totally. And buckle up Teddy. Teddy and I were probably going to go after it here. But look, we reported that Musk has said, he plans to commit around $45 million a month to the America PAC. And probably all those profits from Twitter. But go ahead.
Look, he's got he's got money from lots of different places. So I won't opine on that. But Musk has set on X. He posted a meme in response to the article with the caption fake news. He later said he had created a pack and that quote, funding to date has been far below that level.
He has not specifically denied what we've reported. He all he said is he's not donating $45 million to Trump. And we all know that a lot of people will say their donations might not go to a specific candidate because he can say that it's going to a pack. So it isn't going directly to Trump. So I'm just saying with Elon Musk reporting, you always have to parse the words.
He can get really into semantics and of note, we have not corrected our article. We have multiple sources on it. And I fully stand by all of our reporting. Oh, you don't have to convince me. He's disingenuous. Well, I might need to convince Teddy because he keeps writing articles about how we're wrong, which Teddy make you kiss. I am more skeptical than Emily is that the money is 100% in word that the commitment is in. I'm not skeptical that Elon quote, quote has said it.
But more broadly here. Look, I mean, he is clearly involved in this group. He is confirmed. He has created the group. You know, his allies and his donors and people who are associated with him are funding this organization. There's certainly the expectation that he will give to this group. I mean, that's why I created it. It is interesting that he is kind of wink, wink saying that it is not a Trump group.
And I know some donors to that organization that have sort of positioned it as almost like an election integrity play. You know, quote, unquote, election integrity saying that it is a organization that is meant to kind of safeguard American democracy. And you know, last night, Elon was saying that it is not a group meant to be that partisan.
But look, we're I think we're to miss to take a bit the bigger picture swing here. I mean, look, Elon Musk has a 250 billion dollar fortune, which he's going to be spending on politics. Clearly, the Trump campaign expects him to be a huge part of their work just. And, you know, there was a lot of rumors last week about is Elon Musk going to speak at the convention is is Elon Musk going to be, you know, talking about Trump every single day.
And clearly, you know, I care as you know, this is a wild swing a few years ago when, or maybe, he's 10 years ago. 100% he donated money, by the way, to Democrats and Republicans in the past. It just wasn't big money that we know. I'll tell you, I had a lot of conversations. He didn't like Trump at all. He hated Trump. I don't know what else is that he just thought he was an idiot. But he was engaging with him because he thought he could change his mind.
He was part of two strategic advisory councils that Trump put together and then fell apart. I would also just say, let's not forget about documents here. So with the America pack, the filing show that if you have to check the box for support or oppose in each case, they list for Trump, they check support and then with Biden, they check opposed. So they can say all they want about what it's for. But I like to go back to the documents with a lot of our reporting. That's a great point.
I mean, Jen Sok you show I said he was going to support Trump. He's as subtle as a brick what he's doing. And then of course he did, right? Because I think he doesn't tell the truth all the time. But let's talk a little bit with a broader track industry. Biden has, as you said, been friendly to Silicon Valley. But Trump is really also hostile, I would say, to some of it. He attacked a lot of social media platforms. He's been attacking Mark Zuckerberg. He's an EV skeptic.
He's trying to parse that, but he certainly is sort of against switching to EVs. Explain to me what's happening here. How do they fit together from your perspective? I don't, I don't think it's that complicated. Elon Musk likes to be liked. People like to be liked. You know, you know, he feels aggrieved. I would not understate the impact of Elon not being invited to that one meeting for EV manufacturers.
Like seven years ago, like, you know, he's going to be talking about this. Three years ago. Yeah, I heard from for weeks. Until the end of time. Yes. And look, I mean, the Republican party is embracing him. And, you know, he feels the Democratic party is pushing him away. And, you know, like Elon Musk obviously spends breaking news. A lot of time online where he is being
harassed and saluted by every conservative with the following who are all saying that, you know, he's the greatest person ever. And that's got to feel good. I think a lot of this can be can be pretty simple, which is that or can be reduced to a pretty simple proposition, which is that he is is gravitating toward the audience of people who seem to like him.
And, you know, I think it would be different if Elon Musk represented a company that, you know, want to be broken up something like, you know, Facebook or Google or like a big tech company. I think lots of Republican voters probably don't even know what Tesla is. All right. Emily, I'm going to ask you. Well, yeah, I'm ready. I'm ready to dive in.
What kind of influence are people like Mark Andreessen and David Saxon Peter Tild getting by supporting Trump? I understand the Elon thing because I think he's in a world of hurt. If a Harris administration is going to look at him on the SEC, he's going to deal national security issues around SpaceX. I think he's in quite a world of hurt. And many people have said that to me that he's very worried about a democratic administration and his businesses.
But what kind of influence? And I think that's it's always at the heart of him is his businesses.
I was going to say this isn't just about Elon being liked. There is a major financial play at hand here with his six businesses. And yes, it's great to be liked. Also, it's great to have influence over policy when you run six companies and have, you know, billions of dollars in government contracts with SpaceX where you want to know what's going on with AI regulation and to Teddy's point, you know, none of your companies right now are at the risk of being broken up.
So, okay, you know, with with JD Vance and his views on Lena Con, that might not matter as much to Elon. When you ask about Mark Andreessen and Ben Harowitz, we know that they told staff last week that they intended to contribute personal money to support pro Trump political organizations. And that part of that decision was made after they decided and concluded that Trump would do more than buy into support startups.
So that's kind of where they're thinking is that on Peter Teal. I'll just say a lot has been kind of talked about that isn't quite right. He has said he isn't planning political donations this cycle so far. Obviously, it's a little confusing because he is the person tied to JD Vance. And now we've got JD Vance's Trump's VP pick. So I think that's a big question mark. Like does Peter Teal get involved this cycle or not? And that's a lot of potential big money there too.
Why did he pull away? I have speculation. But why did he pull away? So last year Donald Trump and Peter Teal had a very tense phone call that I think I believe is the last time they've spoken directly, which has sort of frozen that relationship. And the irony here is rich that Peter Teal who's the person who introduced JD Vance to Donald Trump or effectively introduced JD Vance to Donald Trump during Vance's center run.
Vance is now Trump's vice president while the person who made that introduction Peter Teal has not spoken with Donald Trump in a long time in that relationship is icy cold. You know, I think there's a lot of of anxiety and hostility and tension over the 2022 election where Donald Trump endorsed both of Peter Teal's protege's in their Senate runs JD Vance and Blake Masters. And Trump feels that Peter did not adequately repay him during Trump's run in 2024. Teal did not endorse Trump.
Teal, you know, when you talk to people around him, feels burnt out by politics. He feels like he became almost too much of the main character for a certain period of time. You know, Teal believes there have been like threats to his personal life because of his political advocacy. So he is uninterested at least in politics.
The Vance selection changes things. Obviously, Teal, if he is looking for an opportunity to get back into the folds, he has one with the fact that his VP is somebody he knows pretty well. I would not be surprised to see Teal at least get a little bit warmer to Trump over the next couple of months. We'll be back in a minute.
Today, explain Sean Ramas firm standing outside of the White House to ask Americans how they feel about a historic moment. They're president dropping out of the presidential race. Mixed feelings, I think it's sad, but overall, I think he might be making the right decision. I'm sad to see him drop out, but I think it needed to be done. So I think, like, hopefully it brings out more young voters. I just consider this an anti-crisis.
I want to understand this way I know Trump would have won. Now, it's up in here. But I just feel like his America ready for a woman and also a black woman. So that's what scares me. I just don't really see Kamala or really anyone else being a Bible threat to Trump. Kamala, Kamala. We need the facts, man. I don't know. You know what I mean? I think it's something fishy going on, but you know, don't pull me. We're going to ask Vox's Andrew Prokop and David Axelrod how they feel on today explained.
Amen. So Emily, what hopes they have for JD Vance? I'm going to make a comment. I think he's, he was an, had an entirely unsuccessful tech career in the middle of a boom with an assist by Peter Teele. That's an astonishing accomplishment of inadequacy. But they have some hopes about him. When they call him a tech guy, kind of laugh, like, like, yeah, that one to two years as a venture capitalist has gone a long way for him.
He's just was not successful. I don't know what else to say. He just left no mark whatsoever. I mean, I think I think RFK's running mate had had a better success. Oh, let's not get it. It's not on this podcast. I can't. So I would actually go back to the June fundraiser that David Sacks co-hosted in San Francisco. When all of a sudden, you know, people were around the streets of San Francisco wearing all their MAGA gear.
And it's something that I think people, many bystanders were very surprised to see JD Vance spoke there, no script. And one of the things he said was that he wanted to have kind of like, looser AI regulation. And as you can imagine, the people, the audience there were like salivating. They're eating this up. That is what they want to hear. So even though JD Vance has said he likes Lena Khan and he's kind of a fan of what the FTC has been doing. And conservatively.
Right. So which is confusing because you think most people in tech would not support someone who has those views. I do think what he's saying on AI regulation. And frankly, whether he might shift his views on Khan or antitrust, like that's what I think we should be watching for. Of course he will. We do talking about him. And he's a billionaire butler. And I think my favorite is Rachel Maddow's calling him Peter Teyles in term. Teddy, any thoughts?
I feel that the Vance Silicon Valley relationship has been pretty vastly overstated. I just wrote with Ryan Mac a few weeks ago about this. We were trying to even determine how many years he was actually even in the Bay Area. It's like probably less than five. Do you have an address for that? I would love someone to actually find. Like did he live there? Yeah. Great. Good question. He left not a mark. Let us just say.
Look, he had a few junior jobs at, you know, he worked at Peter Teyles venture capital for a mithril as a very junior person. Then he went to work for Steve Case mostly outside of Silicon Valley. And it's Steve who never says a bad thing about anyone said he didn't do much work at all. Case has definitely downplayed the JD involvement.
Look, but I think to Emily's point, like even though in a very short amount of time Vance has been able to kind of leverage those relationships to help him with everything from Hillbilly-Ellogy, you know, promotion, which Peter Teal blurbed even though he didn't even really know JD Vance that well. You know, he was able to use the money obviously for the center race. He was able to use tech money to help get the vice presidency or the ability to get tech money.
So JD has done a great job at taking a relatively short amount of exposure to these people and leveraging it. And like, I don't mean that as negative. I mean, that's politics, right? You're able to use your relationships to your advantage. JD Vance has always relied on the kindness of strangers. As Plantjibos said, so one more question about that. A lot of people are talking about Trump as a threat to democracy itself.
How do you think this partisanship is affecting, you know, donations from Silicon Valley? Well, he doesn't have a lot of Hollywood backing. That's for sure. This isn't just about who gets invited to David Sax's dinner parties, which sounds like the 10th ring of hell to me. But these people are making business deals with each other, raising money. Is there a real big ideological divide in Silicon Valley?
I don't think so. When the information just did a poll, most people are voting for Biden, right? Is it a real one or is it just these very loud people with the side order of Bill Ackman doing conspiracy theories now online? I do not think there's been a full-blown sea change of Silicon Valley turning rightward. I do think there are a number of very loud voices and people that follow them. Cara, I believe you've called these folks lap dogs before. That's your words, not mine.
But one thing that was striking to me, I spoke with a long time Republican lawyer who advises a bunch of tech companies in Silicon Valley who is supporting Trump. He said that people are still stealth to use a tech term about their Trump support in terms of the average worker. There is a bit of a shift a little bit, but it's not like the average person in the average engineer is going out and screaming from the rooftops that they're voting for Donald Trump.
I was told that's still a career-ender. I think there's a little bit of a shift. I would not call it full-blown change. I would say they were never political at all. I think that was always the canard of Silicon Valley people. The libertarian. The liberal-sum louder. They were libertarian light, even. Before this recent Elon Musk change, I didn't even know who he supported. It was even not knowing. There's a lot of San Francisco liberals. Absolutely no question.
But it wasn't as pronounced as Bill Gates. I don't know. I have no idea. Well, they care about policy and they care about their business. A lot of the people that we're talking about in tech, they're annoyed about the SEC and Gary Gensler and crypto regulation. They're annoyed about Lena Khan and the FTC. A lot of them are voting with their pocketbooks. We're on their business. That's just normal political lobbying or voting for the person who's going to help your industry. That's not special.
No, that's why the Versailles notebook was capitalism after all. It's always kept. It's always kept. It's tax breaks and repatriated money. Can I please double that? Sorry, I'll be remiss if I don't mention this. I do think there is a little bit of the anti-woke, like diversity, equity, inclusion, plus the people that are one issue voters on pro-Israel. That's around a cultural thing, not just policy. I do think that's driving some people to vote for Trump, including people in the valley.
I'd be remiss if I didn't say that. I would agree with you. The Israel thing is a big deal for several people. I would agree. You're 100%. That to me is the most potent issue if you go away from money. I've heard that the most is that they were upset with the Biden administration. The woke thing is just cosplaying a little bit. I think they act like victims and they're not victims at all.
Let's finish up with the lawsuits. The big question whether common hair can even use the money that was raised for the Biden campaign. Pretty much every lawyer I've talked to in the last two days. They're going to give them a hard time, but they're going to get the money. It's reportedly about $95 million for this latest fundraising blitz. Rohakun says she does. It's a campaign finance violation threatening to sue.
Campaign finance lawyers are arguing both sides, but mostly people think she can use it. Thoughts of each you, Teddy first. I think it's a fair summary of where we're at. I think that Republicans belatedly and maybe meekly are raising some concerns about this. Obviously, it's unclear exactly how the next couple of days are going to play out.
I would expect them to raise some stink, but I think the general legal consensus, including from some Republican campaign finance lawyers, is that Harris will be able to access this $95 million, which I'll say. It was $95 million as of June 30th. It's probably well more than that when all is done here. Though the last day or so, all this money is being raised for the Harris campaign itself. But clearly, there's going to be a lot of money at stake. It's politics, Republicans will challenge it.
Blah, blah, blah. But to dumb this down as much as we can, essentially, the money was raised by Joe Biden with Commala Harris's running mate. It is the Biden Harris ticket. That's how the money was raised for the last year and a half. Now it's going to be the Harris somebody else ticket, the Harris Bashir ticket, the Harris Cooper ticket, blah, blah, blah. She is probably going to be able to access that money.
And that was a big reason why she was also able to clear the fields effectively, was that if somebody else took over the money, it would have been certainly much more legally treacherous for Democrats to take that over. Probably would have been transferred to a super backer symbol like that. Emily, I'm going to go back to the documents here. Look, I think Teddy made the case on what's going on with the courts.
I'll just say in the memo that was shared with her supporters, they said she can immediately tap the campaign's nearly 96 million in cash on hand. And I'm quoting here, the campaign has already filed paperwork to redesign the committee as Harris for president and senior leadership held a call with staff on Sunday distressed. The campaign's commitment to supporting VP Harris and defeating Trump.
So obviously that's their messaging, but they've been saying that since the beginning, and I'm sure they're going to do whatever they can to make sure she gets that nearly 96 million. Right. So what about campaign find issues surrounding Trump? There already been complaints filed. And he's used campaign funds to pay legal fees. And he's got a lot of them. Are you going to see it tip for that? Because they haven't really pushed it that hard.
The Democrats, but if I think if the Republicans raise this, they're going to focus on Trump's campaign issues. Teddy? Yeah, I mean, look, Democrats for a while have been pointing out the fact that donors are effectively paying for the Trump legal bills. The amount of money that's been going for his legal bills has actually been dropping over time. In most recent filings this week, it appears like he's no longer paying for as much legal bills, at least with campaign dollars.
And look, there's not as much of a scandal or a perceived scandal with Trump right now from a campaign finance perspective, especially now that, you know, it's not even clear there's other trials that are even going to be happening. And for, I think it's me facing the next couple of weeks. I think a lot of the campaign finance lawyers time will be spent debating the common question going forward.
Emily, the Republicans must be gobsmacked by the amount of money that she's been able to raise so quickly. He's certainly got a lot of big donors. He's going around to the fossil fuel guys, the sum wall street guys, that's kind of split. Is it going to be kind of an equal thing from your perspective with her and him? I think it went from Trump having unbelievable financial advantage to a more equal playing field.
But I, you know, a lot of people say just wait till October 15th. That's when the next set of these filings come out. We'll see exactly like how much has been raised more recently. So I'm going to go with time will tell, but I do think it's a lot more even than it had been when Biden was on the ticket. Definitely. Yeah. I mean, I mean, the swing of the narrative here has been, you know, Joe Biden is out raising Donald Trump.
Joe Biden is out raising Donald Trump. Oh my God. Donald Trump suddenly is, you know, competitive financially. And then, you know, over the last couple of weeks, Democrats have been despondent over their financial situation. You know, so much so that tens of millions hours is frozen, Ken Joe Biden even compete. And now I think we're settling back this July into like some element of parity here, right? And, you know, presidential politics, the selection is the most important of our lifetime.
Blah blah blah. Everyone's going to have plenty of money. I almost feel like the, the top line here is not going to be that interesting. I feel like both of these campaigns will be somewhat competitive. Some months, Harris, well, raised Trump, other months, Trump, well, raised Harris. The interesting story is going to be in the details here. And I think a lot of the, it's flowing back to the down ballot races. I know a lot of rich people. I know we're focusing there.
They continue to focus there. Correct. Oh, yeah. And they were saying just, you know, a couple of weeks ago that they weren't putting money in those races because that was one of the cards that they were leveraging to say we're not going to give to Biden. We're not going to give to these down ballot races. That's the doors have swung open again.
And so that's absolutely something where they're putting their money on the ground. More of those Hamptons, fundraisers aren't just going to be for Harris. You know, they might not be for Trump. They're going to be for other politicians that these folks believe in. Right. So last question. Most of the governor's tout is potential presidential cancer now falling in line.
And now for the Michigan governor, Gretchen Whitmer, for example, said they're not interested in being VP. Some of them didn't. Some of them are very much in the race that can feel it. Is there anyone the big donors want on? They've already got JD Vance. Are they happy? Are those donors happy with J. Jones? And then who do they want for the Democrat? Very briefly each of you.
Sure. It's been interesting. Silicon Valley is very excited about JD Vance. Wall Street is not and the more hawkish community of major donors is not excited about JD Vance. But look, he's the choice on the Democratic side. It's probably too early to tell. I think lots of major donors frankly don't really know who a lot of these people are. They're searching who is Andy Bashir on Wikipedia, just like millions, millions of Americans are.
Look, I mean, the options for Kamala Harris, whether it's Tim Walls or Andy Bashir, Josh Shapiro, all fit the same sort of demographic profile, white male, moderate governors. I haven't detected a ground squirrel support for either of them, but we'll know more in a week or so. I would just add Roy Cooper of North Carolina. I've been hearing his name a little bit more. I know he's under active consideration. But until someone's actually getting vetted, I agree with what Teddy saying.
A lot of people are kind of doing their homework on different folks and and a lot of them are a similar profile. Kelly, you left out more Kelly, right from Arizona. Mark Kelly, who actually is the one Democrat that Elon Musk actually likes these days. They're actually pretty close. He's an astronaut. You got a bingo, right? Bingo. Suddenly, oh no, wait, changed my mind. I decided not to be such a force to ask.
Okay. All right. This is really helpful. Thank you so much. I think people don't realize how important money is to this thing in the emotion of it all. And I think that it does come down to spending and the ability to do so. And I appreciate your insights. Thank you. Thank you. On with Cara Swisher is produced by Christian Castro-Ricell, Cateriochum, Jolly Myers, Megan Birdie, and Gabriela Biello.
Special thanks to Kate Gallagher, Claire Hyman, and Kaelin Lynch. Our engineers are Rick Juan, Fernando Aruda, and Alia Jackson. And our theme music is by Tracademics. If you're already following the show, you get $81 million in campaign donations. If not, you did just fall out of a coconut tree. So to repair yourself, go wherever you listen to podcasts, search for on with Cara Swisher, and hit follow.
Thanks for listening on with Cara Swisher from New York Magazine, the Vox Media Podcast Network, and us. We'll be back on Monday with more. Have a question or need how to advice? Just ask meta AI. Whether you want to design a marathon training program or you're curious what planets are visible in tonight's sky, meta AI has the answers. It can also summarize your class notes, visualize your ideas, and so much more. It's the most advanced AI at your fingertips. Expand your world with meta AI.
Now on Instagram, WhatsApp, Facebook, and Messenger. If you've been enjoying this podcast, here's a look into what else is happening at New York Magazine. I'm Cory Seeker, and I'm here with Reeves Wideman, who has written about the American obsession with NDAs. Where did they come from? Why are they everywhere? And are they good for anything besides covering up for abusers? After you poked around NDAs for a while, do you see NDAs used mostly as tools of abuse and coercion?
Do you see positive results? Like, where did you land on NDAs? I think in most situations, it is used as a way to sort of claim power, but not even necessarily to do a bad thing. It's just kind of, it is this now, this sort of boring standard tool in the toolbox of corporations or powerful people. But now it's being used on the people at the bottom. It's the warehouse workers at Amazon being made to sign them, or like, I was just trawling job listings while doing this story.
And there were NDAs for forklift drivers and people working in butcher shops. And I think on the one hand, it's just kind of like, well, I might as well. There's no downside for me to do this. But it is also just another way that you sort of keep your employees or people you get into a relationship with, that you sort of keep your thumb on them. So I do think it is at the end of the day, the people who are giving them out by and large are trying to control someone.
Do you think that they're going to become standard for like literally every interaction in job interview and possibly relationship as well? Or do you think they're just finally going to die or become outlawed? Like, where do we go from here? You know, it was corporations first. Then it was celebrities. Then it was just rich people who aren't famous, but they also want to protect their privacy.
The next frontier is people like you and me. And are we going to start giving them to their partners? You know, I think some people are going to start experimenting with it. It doesn't take much to go online, download a free NDA and without even consulting a lawyer and hand it over to someone. I did as a joke, send one to my girlfriend. She hasn't signed it yet, but I, I, I, I, I, I, I, I, at least sent it. So.
That's Reeves, Widement, who may or may not be single soon. You can read his work on NDAs in our beautiful print magazine in your own home or on NY Mag.com slash lineup.