Support for the show comes from ServiceNow, the AI platform for business transformation. You've heard the big hype around AI. The truth is, AI is only as powerful as the platform it's built into. ServiceNow is the platform that puts AI to work for people across your business, removing friction and frustration for your employees, supercharging productivity for your developers, providing intelligent tools for your service agents to make customers happier. All built into a single platform you can use right now.
This is where the world works with ServiceNow. Visit servicenow.com slash AI for people to learn more. Support for the show comes from Intuit. If you're trying to market to small businesses, you might want to try Intuit SMB Media Labs, the first of its kind, B2B Media Network focused solely on small businesses. SMB Media Labs is powered by the unmatched first party business data of Intuit.
All this means is that they can connect you with unparalleled audience data in a privacy protected manner and you can reach your target market and create scalable campaigns with accuracy and efficiency. Learn more at medialabs.intuit.com. That's medialabs.intuit.com to learn more. Hi everyone, from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. This is on with Kara Swisher and I'm Kara Swisher.
It's only June, but the earliest presidential debate in American history is almost here and that means the presidential campaign season is officially upon us, whether we like it or not. President Biden and former President Trump don't agree on much, but they did agree to kick the commission on presidential debates to the curb and essentially put on their own debate.
CNN will host the candidates in Atlanta and Jake Tapper and Dana Bash will moderate. There'll be no audience, the candidates microphones will be muted when it's not their turn to speak and RFK Jr. did not make the cut. I wanted to dive into the narratives shaping the race, the poll numbers and key issues and of course the debate itself. So I've gathered a panel of experts that know politics inside and out.
Eliana Johnson is the editor-in-chief of the Washington Freebeacon, one of leading neo-conservative news organizations. Before that she was a White House correspondent for Politico and she's a regular presence on cable news. Mike Madrid is a veteran Republican political strategist and co-founder of the Lincoln Project. He is the author also of a new book about Latino voters titled the Latino Century and Stephanie Rool anchors the 11th hour on MSNBC.
She's a former managing editor and anchor at Bloomberg Television who pivoted to journalism after a successful career on Wall Street where she founded the corporate investment bank women's network. Our question for this episode comes from John Favreau, a former speech writer for President Obama and host of the podcast, Podsave America. All right, welcome everybody. Thank you. Thank you. Thanks for having us.
All right, describe the current state of the race right now as we head into the first of two debates. Eliana, you first then Mike and then Stephanie. Well, it's a very close race but I think we've seen a slight uptick in poll numbers for President Joe Biden. We've had a couple of polls including the most recent Fox News poll that showed a shift in independent voters in President Biden's direction.
That I think benefits him going into this debate and indicates that the conviction of President Donald Trump did in fact hurt him among that cohort. Mike? Yeah, I think this is a sign that we're actually following a very predictable trajectory and a race like this. To have just before the conventions, the consolidation of both parties' bases is very normal.
It's very predictable and I think a lot of the people that were not worried about some of the early polling saying this has got to fall into range. It's precisely what's happening. I expect you'll see further consolidation through the summer and I think the fundamentals of this race have always benefited Biden and they continue to look that way. All right, Stephanie. I think the debate is important because we are living in a moment of all sorts of misinformation and news deserts.
It wasn't long ago that President Biden was branded by the right as feeble to old, incoherent. We're dealing with the last few weeks all sorts of cheap fakes of edited videos of the current president, which aren't actually. Yes, we've seen other ones with him here trying to make him look more dottering and I think it's really important that the two of them are standing on that debate stage, you know, sort of shoulder to shoulder.
And maybe the American people will actually see these two people explaining their platforms, which is what the American voter deserves. So we'll get into the debate specifics in a bit, but let's talk about the factors shaping the election. As you guys mentioned, Biden's poll numbers have improved a bit recently and as you said, Elianne, the latest Fox News poll has Biden slightly ahead.
Donald Trump very upset as he is want to do, but Biden's lead is smaller than Fox polls, Marge of Air, very tight. And Trump is ahead in every battleground state according to real clear politics polling averages, meanwhile, according to 538, the race is basically dead even. So how much emphasis do you place on public polling and what's your main takeaways from the poll so far, Mike Stephanie and then Elianne? Well, all public polling should be looked at it is just purely directional.
Anything that you're looking at for the horse race is not it's not telling you anything. The campaigns don't look at it like that political professionals don't look at it like that. I think for people looking at public polling, which again, you're looking for is which direction is it moving and where people have a ceiling and or a floor. Donald Trump has demonstrated a very hard ceiling sitting around a 46, 47% range and Biden is starting to move up.
So again, most of this is weaknesses and Biden's coalition that we're very predictably. We anticipated would be shoring up and they are beginning to now. I think they will continue to as the conventions proceed. And as we go through sort of the parade of debates and vice presidential picks and all the pageantry involved with this stuff, it's following again, I think I think a very predictable range. So then nothing new under the sun, Stephanie?
I think it's less about polling and it's more, you're right, people aren't changing their votes. I don't think at this point it's about are people inspired? Are they uninspired or are they scared? Are people motivated enough with excitement for a candidate, fear of what one of the candidates could potentially do to actually get out there and vote? Nobody's changing their opinions at this point. I don't think. Right, Elianne?
Well, there are a lot of people who haven't really tuned into this race and haven't made up their opinions. There were Trump Biden voters and those are the voters that these people are going to be, that the two campaigns are going to be battling over. Mike is right. It tells us directionality and trends. Of course, this isn't a national election. It's really going to be decided in six battleground states.
So the campaigns are paying closer attention to the battleground polls where Trump has had a lead, even if he's slipping in the national polls. But the trend does show Biden gaining on Trump over the past month with independent voters and Trump hanging on to these narrow leads in the all important battleground states. So you trust them? You don't trust the polling? I mean, how do you each of you feel? Are you like eh?
They can tell you these trends that okay, we can see Trump was persistently ahead in the national polls for the past six months or so, up until the past month. What does it mean? My only takeaways that on the margins, the conviction appears to have hurt him. How important is it? Probably not that important. There's a long time until the election. I don't put all too much stock in that. But Cara, it's the conviction, but it's also Donald Trump barely ever even talks about policy.
Right? So when you talk about how people feel, lasso people say I don't feel great about the economy or I don't know what Joe Biden has done for me. Maybe I'm not that happy with Joe Biden, but as we're getting closer to the election, not only was Donald Trump just convicted, he's yet to articulate a clear policy driven platform. So I think there's all sorts of people who are wondering what exactly am I voting for if I go with Trump?
So with the polls, he's been very unspecific on women's reproductive rights, for example. So when Trump beat his poll numbers in 2016, a lot of pollsters said it was because they weighed their samples improperly. Essentially, they over counter respondents with college degrees. So in 2020, a lot of them adjusted how they weighed their samples.
And Trump still beat his poll numbers. I'm curious, Mike, when you see the underestimating of Trump's support, is there, do you think it's underestimated now in Eliana? Do you think that? No, I think what's happening is there's been a realignment that's been happening, but the both parties coalitions that is reflected in vote choice and not in partisan breakdown.
Let me explain that a little bit. College educated voters are moving very rapidly towards the Democratic Party, non college educated people are moving towards the Republican party equally as quickly. So what happens is by the way, partisan registration is not changing. These people are not leaving their parties. And this is not uncommon in the early stages of a political realignment.
The Southern strategy, for example, took 25 years before people actually changed their party registration. They were just Southern Democrats who voted for the Republican.
In three of the last four election, college educated white women have been voting for Democrats. In three of the last four elections, US foreign Hispanic men have been voting for Republicans. They're not changing party registration. So when you wait, when you wait W E I G H T a poll with those partisan breakdowns, but those shifts are happening. There's no way you can assess how that's going to to affect the outcome of the survey instrument that you're using.
Allianne, what do you think of that? Well, Trump is tricky. I think because of the realignment that Mike mentioned in that it used to be Democrats that got the low propensity voters. And so Republicans were always favored in midterms and in special elections. Now it's Republicans, but this is again Trump's party. And so it's hard to measure when Trump is not on the ballot. And I don't think we'll quite know how do you capture that in polls?
I'm not a pollster. I'm not really sure. But I don't think we're really going to know until election day. But to what you mentioned, Cara, about these voters who are getable for Democrats because of dobs, you can be sure that the Biden campaign is thinking about that. And the Biden campaign manager, Jen O'Malley Dillon, said in a recent interview with Puck News, there's a whole new cohort cohort that has come in since 2020 who are not available to us then.
Who we saw vote in 2022. They're the same people who in primary after primary on the Republican side protested Donald Trump. So you can bet their laser focus on getting Republican voters on the abortion issue, who they want to bring back into the Democratic fold because of that. Okay, but Cara, you know what's amazing to me on this subject? I'm just going to say Jen O'Malley Dillon was a 2020 campaign manager. Go ahead Stephanie.
It's amazing to me the little to no effort Donald Trump is putting forth to win Nikki Haley voters. Right? We sit here talking about the Veeb states and who could Donald Trump pick. You know, it would be the lowest hanging fruit to choose Nikki Haley, right? People like me were shocked when Nikki Haley came out and endorsed him. We thought maybe at very best she'd be quiet.
He went after her, he insulted her, he humiliated her. She then came out and was like, yep, and I'm still going to vote for him. And you guys mentioned it before in states like Maryland, two months after she dropped out of the race, she's still getting 20% of the votes. And yes, there were never Trumpers in there, but not all of them. Even if he pulled a slim group of them, wouldn't he want to do that? Instead, we're dancing around talking about Tim Scott and Vivek Ramaswami.
To me, that shows somebody who's putting their ego and their need for ultimate loyalty from their VP pick above strategy to win this race. So I can't imagine. Shut up, Nikki Haley. But let go ahead. Well, let's go ahead and say that's Stephanie's absolutely right. Sorry, what'd you say? Let me get louder for people in the back. She was absolutely right. There has been no outreach to this Republican voter, at least the institutional folks.
Specifically, I've been on a probably a dozen phone calls with these people saying, where are the marching orders? How do we help? How do we help? When I hear anything. And to Elias points, there's also a problem with the Biden campaigns over reliance on the belief that they can get more blood out of the turnip of that demographic, which is the college educated white woman. There aren't that many more left to be had when, and this is really, really important.
You're losing people of color from your base. And that's what's making me very nervous. Is they can get more women? I think they can marginally. But they are a hen-raging, black and brown men right now. And there are far more of those now to be lost than what they can get out of Republican pre-sex. Can I just add one note on this? Sure. I would caution Democrats against overconfidence on this front in that Donald Trump has not made his vice presidential selection yet.
Look, I don't think he's going to choose Nikki Haley. And I think he probably has sensible reasons for not choosing Nikki Haley. But let's wait and see if he makes a choice who is likely to draw in more independent voters. Or if he doesn't, if he loses his selection, he's probably going to jail. So I would assume, even if you think the guy is a megalomaniacal self-interested lunatic, he still needs to make the right choice. Right. He doesn't going to pick someone crazy.
But let's talk about what Michael says at excellent point about key demographics. Pundits often like to pick a group and make the focus, you know, of the pre-election analysis. And that 1996 suburban moms are going to be the key in 2004. It was security moms and NASCAR dads. It's performative, but it's shorthand to a real thing. Campaigns do target specific groups. Mike, talk about what demographics would be key to this election. And then, Eliana then Stephanie.
Yeah, the key demographic is going to be US-born Hispanic men. They've been moving away from the Democratic Party for the last 10 years. And the Democrats really didn't realize it until 2020 when they lost 8% in that cycle. But remember, Hillary Clinton lost from Obama's numbers. Trump has picked up in two presidential cycles. And at least one of the midterms in 2022, they held steady. That's a trend line that the Democrats are not taking seriously.
And there are not, again, I'm absolutely convinced. There's more of them. There's more of them. And they're growing. There's 4 million new Latino voters that have come online since since four years ago. We're not making more 35, 40-year-old white college educated Republican women. There's just, we're not. We're not making more of those, not many more. And so the math, the math is giving me some angst because I think O'Malley and the Biden campaign is right to be leaning in there.
But they're seeding. They're giving up this voter unnecessarily and taking a risk. That I think is just a very big tactical mistake. So, Elian, did you think they're giving up on this? Or they never had a chance with this voter? I think Biden's policies and certain places he's leaning in to things is a sort of signal that he's giving up on the normies. And that's who Trump is going for. The Israel-Gaza War is a good example where he hasn't really picked a lane on policy.
Environmental regulations are another place where he's leaned in hard and gone into green initiatives and has, you know, he's, I think he's losing the normal folk that Donald Trump is picking up. And what Trump needs to do is not scare these people away by talking about stolen elections in January 6th. He needs to welcome them back. We'll be back in a minute.
Support for the show comes from Intuit. If you're trying to market to small businesses, you might want to try Intuit SMB Media Labs, the first of its kind, B2B Media Network focused solely on small businesses. SMB Media Labs is powered by the unmatched first-party business data of Intuit. All this means is that they can connect you with unparalleled audience data in a privacy protected manner and you can reach your target market and create scalable
campaigns with accuracy and efficiency. Learn more at medialabs.intuit.com. That's medialabs.intuit.com to learn more. Fox created. This is Advertiser Content from PBS. I'm Covell from Starkin. I'm Router U.S. I'm Router. Jason Scott practically grew up at the Pike Place Fish Market in Seattle. His mom was a fishmonger and now he's one too. He sees firsthand the toll that irresponsible fishing can take on our oceans. I grew up here. I'm only 51. I know stuff that we can't even
get locally anymore because it's been overfished. That's not fair. A common misconception is that wild caught is good and farmed is bad, but Jason says it's not that simple. I think as a consumer you shouldn't accept if the person selling you, you know, your fish or meat or whatever it is. It doesn't know where it comes from or how it's caught or the same. And you know, we're moving a lot of fish. We need ways where everybody can eat it and we're not
depleting the oceans. Whether the fish you eat is sustainably farmed or wild caught, knowing the difference is the first step. In PBS's new three-part docuseries hope in the water. Scientists, celebrities and regular citizens come together to explore unique solutions and challenges facing our oceans and how we preserve the food it provides. They know it for you to keep enjoying the riches of the ocean. You're going to have to also be
a friend of the ocean. Join Chef Jose Andres, Martha Stewart, Shailene Woodley and Baratunde Thurston as they deep dive into the powerful blue food technologies that can not only feed us, but help save our threatened seas and fresh waterways. Stream hope in the water now on the PBS app. Support for this podcast comes from Constant Contact. If you're a business owner, you already know that it's really, really hard to cut through the noise of everyday life.
If you want to connect with your customers, you need to break through the noise. You need Constant Contact. Constant Contact is a marketing platform that makes it easy to reach new audiences, grow your customer list, and connect over email, text, social media, and more. Whether you're a marketing guru or just learning the ropes, Constant Contact offers writing assistance tools and automation features that make it simple to say the right thing at the right time.
So get going and start growing your business today with a free trial at ConstantContact.com. Just go to ConstantContact.com right now. Constant Contact. Helping the small, Stan Tall, ConstantContact.com. Mike, your book, The Latino Century, it came out last week. You talk about even though you did your best to ring the alarm, Trump ended up winning a third of the Latino vote in 2020, despite being pretty openly racist towards Latinos. I mean,
not pretty, very. So Democrats, they need to run big margins with Latinos to win. What is holding them back? Because that's something like jobs and economy is something that appeals to this. El groups. Yeah, that's a great question. And that question is going to determine who the next president of the United States is going to be. The one where you don't hear in this economy really much is affordability. That's where the real problem is. If you can talk about the S&P,
you can talk about the Dow, you can talk about GDP growth. Affordability. Stock market. Affordability. Affordability. Affordability. Not everybody. No, no, they need to do a little bit more Bill Clinton feeling your pain with these voters to at least start engaging them again. For the first time I'm starting to hear Latino Democrats saying, okay, this is happening. Like, okay, we can get them back. There's finally an acknowledgement. But I mean, guys, we're five months out of this race.
Like, you better get your head in the game and start talking about the affordability solutions. Because when when interest rates have tripled, not Biden's fault, but they've tripled when currency's been devalued by 20% not Biden's fault necessarily working class people have been hitting the gut on affordability. It's real. Kara, it's more than that. When you think about Latino voters, you shouldn't just think of them
of that worker. The fastest growing group of small business owners and entrepreneurs in the United States are Latinos. And if you speak to small business owners, they are strangled by regulation. We sit here and talk about like, yes, we want to afford more benefits to our employees, which is great. We want to make sure what stores are charging are affordable. And the Biden administration often just talks about business as big business. But small businesses often get hit
with the same regulation as big business, but they can't survive. And that's a group that needs to be spoken to. Yeah, it's an entrepreneurial class. And also, they don't go ahead. Well, on the subject of affordability, we're coming up on the July 4th holiday. And if you guys will recall, a couple of years ago on July 4th, the Biden administration's big communications initiative was to tell everybody that their hot dogs were 5 cents cheaper when we're suffering,
you know, record inflation. And I think, you know, their strategy has been to tell people that what they're feeling in their pocketbook does not exist. And the reality is that the voters who are leaving the party, when you pull voters, they cite inflation, immigration, as some of their top issues. And I found that if you listen closely to what the Biden campaign is saying, it's, it is often to dismiss those concerns or to play them down. Can I push back for a moment?
Sure. This goes back to the vibe session because the people who are the most outspoken about being unhappy about the economy are some of the wealthiest people. And while the stock market isn't the economy, obviously the stock market is breaking records. And if we want to talk about your live fourth holiday, this summer, we're expecting record travel. We're expecting record air travel, record amount of people on the road. And one of the reasons your hotel calls so much money is because
they're selling out because people are traveling. And so there is this disconnect that yes, when a pollster calls people are like, I don't feel good. I don't like that my entree is costing $25. But we're still going out to eat in that restaurant. The only thing is I think with the stock market, if you got Nvidia, you're great. Otherwise, you're flat as you know. Like that's the thing is
everybody's not benefiting. And the stock market is not the real world. It's true. And it doesn't count for it, you know, the cost of gas and the cost of groceries that I think people will feel on a daily basis. Yeah, I think they're denying the things. But we're not seeing people change their behavior yet. When you're going to start to see, you agreed. But when you actually start to see businesses lower their prices and it's starting to happen now, right? But people are still out there
paying up. They're not we're not lowering the amount of times. We're going to the movies and we're going to concerts. You can still be angry about it. So according to polls, let's move to young people trending away from Biden. Trump recently didn't interview with Logan Paul. That fine figure. But young bros love him. Then again, out of all the age groups, young people, you should have the lowest voter participation rates. Eliana, how relevant will young voters be? I'm always like,
they always seem to be the same thing. Like we make a big deal of it. And then who counts are older voters, women voters, black women voters in particular. How do you look at young voters in this election? I'm similarly skeptical of younger voters. But look, it's been a real weak spot for Republicans and the Republican Party historically. So I lawd President Trump for going out and trying to communicate with younger people. And when we look at Biden's strengths and the polls, he's
pulling quite strongly among older people. And so I think it is something the Trump campaign needs to be doing. They should be trying to speak to all people about issues of concern. So, you know, good for them, even if it's a low return proposition. Logan Paul is hugely popular. I'd love for someone to tell him to do like the Venn diagram of Logan Paul listeners versus how many are actually registered to vote. I don't know. I know nobody's figured this out, but the
Latino demographic is the youth demographic. It's the same. It's the overlap. It's like enormous. We talked about them like they're separate. They're not. And the fact that either displaced or they're shifting in other directions is something that I think the whole narrative this election cycle is peculiarly missing. Let me say one quick thing. Donald Trump's, you know, the plus that he brings is he does have a unique ability to bring these lower
information lower propensity voters to the polls. The problem is the same tactics and vulgarity that he uses to bring them to the polls are what turns off college educated women at the top of the Republican ladder. It's why in 2020 Republicans were the beneficiaries of the highest turnout election in history. House Republicans picked up seats and the highest turnout in history
and Donald Trump lost the presidential election. Yeah, which was interesting, but we're very, very time to write down every demo, but I should point out that Trump also appears to be doing better with women and black voters than he did in 2020. But the disengaged voter is what you just talked about. And people who pay less attention to politics are more likely to vote for Trump than voters who do not pay attention. So how do you persuade people that
aren't interested or is it a waste of time? It's not a waste of time, but you've just got to go where they are, right? Like I'm obviously not the first person to tell you that all politics is local, but those candidates need to get their campaigns and they need to be at local events, speaking to people and explaining to them, here's what our platform is, here's what we are doing for you, right? Think about in the last year and a half, all the times we talked about on television,
a student debt being forgiven. There are scores of people out there who might be eligible for that, and they don't actually know the details or the fact that hearing aids were then available over the counter. You didn't need a prescription, whether it's the current president or the former president, they need to get to the people and explain their platforms. And especially for the Biden administration, given the amount of misinformation out there and the news deserts.
So let's get to the actual issues. We've discussed the big one seems to be the economy, specifically inflation year over year. Inflation is a bit over 3%, but cumulative inflation during Brian's presidency is almost 20%. Given that reality, how should Biden message on inflation, Mike, why don't you take this one? Well, again, I think what he's going to have to do is acknowledge that it's problematic and not try to explain it away and say, here's where we're at. Like I said,
this is the, Bill Clinton did this masterfully. You acknowledge people's paying you acknowledge where it's at. No one's going to hold it against you any more than they already have about blaming you right or wrongly, but they don't care about what, what happened in the past. Voters care about what the solution is going to be. You present a better solution and you're going to get more yield from that voter. Now, here's the thing that's important. You don't need to win all of
those voters back. You just can't lose that voter group by 2530 points like he is. If you narrow that gap, you're going to be in a much stronger position and that should be the goal. Eliana, just to go back to the African American voter real quickly, that's a huge problem for Biden. If you go back to the coalition that Barack Obama built, this was obviously a hugely important part of that coalition for him. Trump does not have to win African American voters. He will not win
African American voters. He just needs to lose by less and to the extent that they stay home or they are disengaged, that is a huge problem for Biden. In terms of speaking about the economy, Biden needs to acknowledge the reality and not try to tell people that inflation doesn't exist or that it's transitory or that it's going away quickly. I think he needs to tell people that, yes, prices are up. Here's our solution. Here's what we're going to do. You know who's not going
to solve it? That guy standing right over there. He is not the solution to your problems. We're on top of it. We're handling it and so on. Okay. So, Cara, I'm going to jump in and just say, I think the Biden administration is doing that. Janet Yellen, the Treasury Secretary, over a year ago, corrected herself and said, I was wrong saying that inflation was transitory. It's much stickier than we thought. I think that we are pushing a false narrative around this idea
of like the Biden administration needs to start communicating about inflation. They are. It's not necessarily having an impact, but the president has been on the road since before Trump's trial. Literally, town after town talking about the things he is doing. He can't lower interest rates. That is beyond his control. They are doing a lot of things. It still has people really upset. Greedflation is real. The fact that we've seen target goals that all of these fast food restaurants
realize, oh, maybe we should lower our prices. The fact that they were able to lower prices like that is evidence that it wasn't just supply chain. It wasn't labor cost. It's that they were able to raise their prices and raise their prices and the demand was still there. I think the Biden administration is communicating it, but I think Iliana's last point is the great one, which she has to make at the debate on Thursday night. Yes, the economy is difficult.
Inflation is a problem, but what is the man next to me offering you? Because massive tariffs, getting rid of income tax and just lowering the corporate tax rate, ain't going to make your life more affordable. There's also a bit of a memory dump happening, but it doesn't get voters. I'm not sure are listening to Janet Yellen, but I'm going to move on to immigration. Trump says he will launch, quote, the largest domestic deportation operation,
American history as campaign. Spokewoman says they will quote Marshall, every federal and state power necessary to do it. They're talking about a militarized mass deputations, which is a lot more aggressive than building a wall. Mike first seems to be the kind of message it might turn off independence and swing voters, but it might help turn out disengaged voters because people are worried across the country around immigration policies. Is that a good strategy to say we're going to
deport everybody? I mean, I think the more specific you get, I think it becomes problematic. But look, this is this actually enjoys majority support most most key demographics. And it's been highly effective for Republicans over the years is you're scaring these voters back into the Republican tent and it works. I don't know that it works this time because again, the more specific and glory with the details they get and they can't help themselves. That's when you start to lose
people. Migrant USC fight. Yeah, exactly. That we turn to this horrible dehumanizing spectacle. I mean, yeah, that turns independence off. It's talks generically about a deportation effort. Voters going to like that. Independent voters are going to like that. White women are going to like that. I agree with that. I think Trump won campaigning on immigration and on aggressive immigration rhetoric in 2016. It was the first thing he talked about in 2015 when he descended the
golden escalator and the situation has gotten worse under Joe Biden. And I think when you talk about a memory dump, people look back fondly on Trump's record on immigration actually. And would much prefer going back to the era of Trump. The New York Times, I believe I may get this wrong. It might have may have been the Wall Street Journal had a prominent piece over the weekend about
immigrants arriving in the suburbs. And what do suburban towns do? And the focal point of it was a suburban town in Utah overwhelmed by Venezuelan migrants and their struggles with it. That is not good for Joe Biden. Think about Kara when Greg Abbott pulled the move of busing migrants or flying them to different states. And everybody was outraged and everybody was offended and potentially it was illegal from a political strategy standpoint. I don't know if it was a bad
move for him, right? Because it goes, it really plays right into the coastal elites saying like, we're a nation of immigrants, how dare states like Arizona and Texas be unhappy about immigrants. And whether it was disgusting or offensive that Greg Abbott did it, he was making a point that from a political perspective may have worked for him. So Biden recently announced a border crackdown on one hand on the other hand, a new program, it'll give a half a million immigrants who entered
the country illegally, a path way to citizenship. Mike, do you think the timing and strategy of these moves is enough? Can he say, should he at the debate, for example, say, you know what, I'm doing something if the Republicans would help me, I tried to pass a bill and they wouldn't let me, what is the move here for Biden? I mean, I think it is a little bit too late, but at least he did it. And he's got something that no Democrat has had in the past 30 years, which is a specific policy
on border security within which to stake his claim on. That's what's so important. That's what Democrats have always been afraid to do. And Biden did it probably at a desperation, but it doesn't matter. And that's that the one thing he should not do is blame Trump. And I'll tell you why, don't this is Donald Trump's strongest issue. He, this is where he beats Biden the biggest and the best. So to blame Trump is an absolutely huge tactical mistake. He needs to own the specifics of
the issue and then let Trump and the Republicans respond to him. That's how you close that gap. You're never going to be stronger on the border than Trump, but again, it's a game of margins. You don't get that by blaming him. You don't get that by blaming the Republicans, although it's
true, you get that by owning the policy solution. Alianna, I don't think that the pairing of the two policies is going to cut it for Biden to the extent that I don't believe the administration is going to be tough with the enforcement of the policies and actually stem the number of migrants that are coming across. That's what's causing the voter reaction is that they're actually dealing with migrants who are then coming into public schools requiring English as a second language,
resources and so on. Beyond that, the other Biden policy that granted legalization to those who are married to American citizens, I'm not sure how that's going to go over. I think among the people who have the strongest reaction to legalization proposals are actually people who came into the country legally, immigrants. And I do think that the that President Biden risks a backlash among Latinos who are fleeing the Democratic Party who came here and went through the paces. And I say
this, my mother being one of them. So let's get to the biggest issue for Biden, which is the abortion issue is counting on abortion to turn out voters. This is interesting. Almost one in five voters in the United States think Biden is more responsible for ending women's right to abortion than Trump. I don't know how that's possible. And do you think it's a motivator? And there's lots of issues.
IVF, contraception, etc. I think that the voter who believe the one in five voter who believes that Biden is responsible for limiting women's reproductive rights, I think that voter is never ever voting for Joe Biden. I think that voter is completely susceptible, hook line and sinker to misinformation. So I think trying to convert that voter is a colossal waste of President Biden's time. It is not a waste of his time to focus on informing voters, helping them understand what's at risk. I also
think that the Biden administration is dependent on that, right? Think about the big red wave that we expected in the last midterms. Think about all of those young voters that before the DOBS decision were uninspired by President Biden said he is not doing anything for me. You know, nothing's happening. And then when the DOBS decision happened, they motivated, they organized, they voted,
and the Biden administration is counting on them yet again. Yeah. Well, I think the reason they're saying so is they're disengaged and they're saying it happened on Biden's watch, even though it wasn't his thing. It happened on his watch. And listen, he's not a dictator. He doesn't have ultimate control. I think there are low information voters. But, Alina, how do you, does this play? This is a good topic for Biden, correct? It's absolutely a good topic for Biden. His campaign
knows it. So they're clearly looking at where is the issue on the ballot in November. You know, it's ironic because this is something that the right built towards and campaign for for three decades and that they got in DOBS. But it is proven politically catastrophic. And you've, we've seen political candidates not know how to talk about it, including Trump. And it will be quite interesting to see how he how he talks about it in the debate. And he does have an opportunity, I think,
to develop a message around abortion. He needs one to be consistent with it. And to be a party leader, which he's resisted doing and to model, how should other candidates be talking about this issue around the country? But his core base at this point is white evangelical Christians. And so what could he give him? But what could his message be on abortion that satisfies them and also attracts any other voter? You know, it's interesting. He tapped Mike Pence
in 2016 because he really believed he needed to shore up that part of the party base. Those folks are with him now. He's not considering an evangelical Christian type for outreach to that portion of the party. And I think there are a lot of options in front of President Trump to message on this where he could say, look, I'm four of 15 week ban, a 16 week ban, a 20 week ban.
I'm not four national legislation or I'm four national legislation on this. You know, but there are ways he could talk about this that are consistent with the majority American position on this that I think would allow him to set an example for the rest of Republicans, Republican lawmakers in the country. But aren't those going to wait? Are those? They would piss off evangelicals who are going to go and vote for whom? Trump. That's correct. So let's talk, let's move
to age, Mike, not that you're old or anything like that, but it's unavoidable issue. And they're both old according to a market law school poll Esma, almost eight out of 10 voters think Biden is told to be president and only about five out of 10 said Trump is too old. Trump's had more than his fair share of senior moments, including recently. I would talk to some of those people at that CEO round table. And I think they were shocked by the mostly the wandering and the meandering.
They hadn't seen it up close. But still the ages through so much worse for Biden. What can he do about it? I've heard a lot of, yeah, punters kind of say that he needs to kind of own it, lean into it, do kind of the Reagan joke with it. Yeah. I disagree. I don't think this is a defining or definitive issue at all. I really don't. I think this is all inside baseball. And the reason why is because as we get closer to this election, the reason why both candidates base is consolidating
is not because they like or believe in their candidate on policies and issues. It's because they're scared to death and horrified that the opponent might win. So if Donald Trump were to be in jail and running in an orange jumpsuit, he's not going to lose any of his base. Why do we think it's going to be any different with Democrats because they're guys old Stodgy and shuffling and maybe mumbling a little bit? It's not. He's not. No one's going to lose any votes based off of
these these these exterior dynamics. The opponent is what is defining this race. It's why they're having trouble consolidating on both sides. But ultimately, as we get closer, when they realize, God, I've got two bad choices, but one is really, really bad. That's when these voters will come. Right. So it's about negative part of the ship. It's all negative part of the ship. Eliana, how do you look at the age issue? People certainly talk about it. I absolutely don't think
Biden should be leaning into his age. I don't really think he's capable. We got into this little bit on CNN. I don't think he's capable of leaning into it, making light of it and using it to his advantage. And the only way that he can use it to his advantage is by standing on a debate stage and delivering a Bafo performance. And we will know whether he did that successfully on Friday morning, which he did in the state of the union. Everyone was like, oh, he's not
weakened at Bernays. Look at that. So which was a mistake on the Republicans part. Karat Thursday night is the night for Joe Biden. If he wants to close this gap, right? The whatever you just said, the eight out of 10 people in the Marquette poll who are uncomfortable with his age, but the five out of 10 only five out of 10 who are uncomfortable with Trumps. In my opinion, Joe Biden's got to show up and say, you're right. I am old, but the person standing next to me is a
convicted felon. The person standing next to me, cozy's up to dictators like Kim Jong-un, like Vladimir Putin. With the person standing next to me, you could lose your health care. We could see our jobs at risk. We could see our leadership on the world stage exists. This is Joe Biden's opportunity to actually get on the stage and find his Irish fury and punch Trump. If he doesn't, we're just going to see more and more videos of him shuffling and dottering. The right is going to
use it over and over and over. I think it's a risky situation for Trump that they keep talking about how old and confused Biden is. If you actually look at what President Trump has been saying in the last two weeks with his fear of shark bites and electric boats, that's far more concerning. Well, look, going into the debate, the Trump campaign has set the bar low because they've been saying this guy's senile. The Biden campaign has said Trump's a dictator. He's a lunatic. He's
dangerous. Thursday offers an opportunity for both candidates to explode the caricatures of them that have been put out by the other side. To the extent that either candidate can successfully do that, IE, that Joe Biden looks vibrant. Donald Trump can look sober and sane. They will have succeeded. Mike, do you think these videos matter or not because they're all over the place for both of them, right? In some way, they do not, they do not matter and neither does the debate
performance. They to be the wet blanket on this. No, no, no debate has ever changed the trajectory of a presidential campaign. You can argue 1960, Nixon, Kennedy, I'll give you that. It looks like it's true that 60 years ago. That's not the way the voters are tuning into this. That's not what they're looking for. Donald Trump lost the debate against Hillary Clinton. It didn't change the trajectory of that race. It didn't change the trajectory of the race the last time. He's going to
go out. He's going to try to make this as spectacle because he can't do anything other than that. He can't help himself. Will it remind voters? Sure, it will. But so will the next five months of the presidential campaign. Right. So the last thing that I want to go ahead, I think Ilyana makes a great point that this is an opportunity for Donald Trump to appear sane and sober. But my question is going to be then what words is he going to say? Because we haven't heard him
put forth any ideas or any policies that are sane and sober. So I welcome that like yes, this is his chance to do it. I just don't know what those words are going to be. And you are just mentioning those videos that keep going around and something that I find absolutely revolting. When a low information voter sees those videos and is like, well, he is dottering or he doesn't know. Fine, I'll take it. When you see the most highest information of voter, one of the most
successful people in business, a guy like Bill Ackman, right? Start tweeting out the video of Joe Biden in France, Dr. Jill Biden, you know, to get your husband off the campaign trail, he can't even find his seat. It's so sickening to me that we've got titans of industry pushing nonsense lies. Let these two guys get on the stage, tell us their policies. And then American can decide
who the hell they want to vote for. Okay, but come on. I mean, this is another, this is another issue in which the Biden campaign, it's on, it's akin to inflation where they're trying to tell voters. You're not seeing what you're seeing. You're not feeling what you're feeling when they say, oh, we can't keep up with Biden. He's so sprightly. Whatever the merits of the videos are, voters are seeing the president on a daily basis with their own eyes. And they can see, you know, I just
watched the full 2020, the two debates. Biden really has deteriorated. You know, I am a conservative, but I don't know. I'll leave it to you guys and your listeners. I don't think I'm a crazy right wing lunatic. And the guy looks really old and dottering at times to me. So I do think to the extent that Democrats say like, this is terrible. The people are pointing this out like that is dangerous because he, he looks really old and confused at times. No, Eliana, I agree with you 100%. My point is,
use the actual real examples of when Joe Biden looks old and dottering and lost. You have them. But when high information people are pushing the lies, we deserve better. That's my point. And there's a lot of the real examples and Trump the same way. I mean, the guy is an untrained missile. Like I don't think his campaign knows what he's going to go out and do on Thursday. And they're prepared to go clean up the after. But Trump's different. I mean, people don't look at him
and say, Oh my gosh, he's so crotchety. You know, they think, Oh my gosh, we don't know what's going to come out of his mouth. And Trump has a showmanship and charisma that Biden doesn't really. We'll be back in a minute. Support for this podcast and the following message is brought to you by E-Trade from Morgan Stanley. Take control of your financial future with E-Trade, no matter what kind of investor you are.
Our tools and resources can help you be ready for what's next. Now when you open an account, you can get up to $1,000 with a qualifying deposit. Terms apply. Learn more at eTrade.com slash Fox. Investing involves risks. Morgan Stanley Smith, Bernie LLC, member CIPIC. E-Trade is a business of Morgan Stanley. Support for the show comes from the Harvard Business Review. I made a career out of taking a task, some of the tech industries biggest players. And honestly,
some of these guys really had no clue what they were doing. And they probably could have benefited from some of the resources available at a Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business Review is a top source for smart management thinkers. Cultivated by some of the greatest minds in business, the Harvard Business Review is a trove of rigorous insight and best practices. And it's more than
the flagship magazine you know. You can find the same level of expertise on hbr.org and for just $10 a month, a subscription unlocks unlimited access to a variety of resources like hundreds of articles, podcasts, newsletters, case studies, and so much more. I use hbr all the time when I'm researching companies, when I'm doing interviews, when I'm looking at case studies, and other things. It's a really important resource to just find things very quickly actually and then read up on
them and get going. While so much of a Harvard Business Review's content is available for free after signing up at their site, subscriptions to unlimited content start at only $10 a month. That's a lot of content for a very little amount of money. Go to hbr.org slash subscriptions and enter the promo code Kara right now to get up to 10% off your subscription. Again, to save 10% off your hbr subscription, go to hbr.org slash subscriptions and enter the promo code Kara. Information can be found
in the funds' perspectives. Support for this show comes from Atlassian. Atlassian software like Giro, Confluence, and Loom help power global collaborations for all teams so they can accomplish everything that's impossible alone. Because individually we're great, but together we're so much better. That's why millions of teams around the world, including 75% of the Fortune 500, trust Atlassian software for everything from space exploration and green energy to delivering
pizzas and podcasts. Whether you're a team of two, two hundred or two million, or whether your team is around the corner or on another continent altogether, Atlassian software is built to help keep you all on the same page from start to finish. That way, every one of your teams from engineering and IT to marketing, HR and legal can stay connected and move together as one towards shared company-wide goals. Learn how to unleash the potential of your team at Atlassian.com.
That's atlssiain.com at Atlassian. So Mike, let's get into the debate since you think it doesn't matter. So the earliest earliest debate in American history, the candidates have ditched the commission on presidential debates and basically set their own debate with CNN and ABC. So you don't think it's important at all. Is that correct in my characterizing? I think they're in, I guess. Except for entertainment value.
I don't think they're consequential in the trajectory of the race. I don't know if I would say they're important or not, but debates do not change people's minds. You may see a one or two point, somebody falls or drools on themselves or whatever. Yeah, you might see a two point pot one way or the other, but that's going to correct within a week if that. Remember, the conventions are coming up. No one's going to remember this debate unless something spectacular happens.
But after the conventions, no one's going to remember this debate, which is why by the way, they wanted to do it. Both campaigns were reaching such high level negatives of both of these candidates that the candidate that has the most air time is probably going to lose in the stretch of this campaign. That's why they're doing it. That's why they're front loading up. So the debate is happening on Biden's terms. His campaign wanted the first debate in June. They
wanted to do it without an audience. They did not want RFK Jr. on stage. They got all three demands met. Technically, RFK Jr. could have qualified for the debate. The qualification rules and early date made it virtually impossible for him. I think he and Nicole were going to a pre-show for burning man. So that's why they couldn't make it. All right. Okay. There we go. It seems like the Trump campaign is at least somewhat wary of RFK Jr.
Should he have been there? Eliana, I'm giving you this one. I don't know. I mean, it's a TV show. I think it would have been good TV to have him there, but I don't really have any principled view of this. I'm happy to see Trump and Biden duke it out on the debate stage. I really don't feel strongly. All right. So every episode we get an expert question. This one is from John Favreau, former Obama speech writer and podcaster at Crooked Media. Let's hear it. In the event
the Jake Tapper or Dana Bash are listening to this podcast. What is one question each of you would ask Donald Trump and Joe Biden at the debate if you only have one question for each of them? Thanks guys. Stephanie, you start one question for each and make it tight. Donald Trump is Joe Biden the current legitimate president. All right. For Biden. Why should America vote for you? Eliana, I like that question for Trump. I think that's good. For Biden, it would be
let me think I could change my Biden. You were supposed to be a bridge president. Why are you running again? There's another good one. We'll give go come back to you. Come back to me. All right. Let me think. All right. Mike, you're next. I think Biden, I would ask. Do you think
that working class people are better off now than they were four years ago? And I think for Trump, I would ask Trump something about his, this is probably a personal bug about asking him something about his faith, something about something about the, that something that sets them apart from his base, like clearly not because we'll have in again, I've got my own biases here about this. All right. Mike, he has a great answer. Of course, I believe in God. I have my own Bible. You can
buy it for $69.99. Fair enough. Fair enough. Yeah. And I think for Biden, it would be your campaign talked a lot you and your, you and your administration and your campaign talked about Bidenomics. You don't anymore. Why not? Good one. Okay. So we're getting to the end. I'm going to assume they'll both get asked about the conviction, which led to record fundraising for Trump that erased Biden's cash advantage after initially shying away from saying too much about the case, the Biden camp
has leaned into calling Trump a convicted felon. They're spending $50 million on Adlets and includes highlighting the conviction. If you were advising Biden, would you say do this? It ultimately sinks in. Now, Eliana seems to think it has had a bigger effect. But there's a lot of money going here. Now, Biden is spending it on a huge ground game turnout operation. Trump campaigns said they're running a leaner operation. That's more focused on micro targeting and
his fewer boots on the ground. And of course, there's those legal costs. What strategy makes more sense? Mike. That's a great question because it's never really a money problem. I've never seen a presidential campaign having money problems. There will always be the resources there. It's how you spend it. I'm not sure that micro targeting for a Republican makes a lot of sense. In an era when your coalition has realigned and you need bigger turnout. So I think that's a huge tactical
mistake on Trump's part. Biden, I think, needs to lean into it. It is doing damage. It is hurting with that small sliver of independence and that fight for women who want to leave the Republican party who are very uncomfortable being there. The number one response for why Republicans are bailing on Trump is the January 6th stuff and then the big lie. So lean into both of those and wrap it up with the 34 convictions. And I think you got a pretty, pretty damn good hammer.
Okay. Another topic that probably ask the big question about Gaza and Israel. Biden's support for Israel has become a liability for among young people and Arab Americans, but progressive support for Palestine and Biden's public pressure on Netanyahu might also be hurting Biden with Jewish voters. Trump has his own set of issues. If you were advising Biden and we know that wouldn't happen, but if you were generally trying to help him, when how would you tell him to answer the
Gaza question in a debate? I can assure you that won't happen. I think the Biden administration has made a mistake trying to straddle this issue and it hasn't gotten him much in that he's got protesters disrupting his events. They're likely to disrupt the convention in Chicago. And I actually don't think that voters in Dearborn are going to be all that important in this election. I think the Biden campaign is overweating that. I think there's much more. You talk about
Jewish voters, but I don't think it's that. I think there's broad Christian support for Israel and its mission here in the election. And I would tell him to pick a lane and be more clear on America's strong support for Israel. You're going to see Trump do that. And I think it will pay dividends for him. So Mike, I want to talk about one more shift and no step, then we'll have an opinion about this. But a lot of the tech world has turned on Biden.
It used to be a big supporters of Democrats. There's actually two teams forming. There's the Mark Cuban, Melinda Gates, Mackenzie Bezos, Cheryl Sandberg's apparently given quietly read Hoffman's. And then you have the Elon Musk's, well, just the Elon Musk and his backup dancers. We'll just call them that. They're not. None of them are big enough for you to even utter their names. That's why I'm not doing it. So talk about that. Is that matter that this group of people who
are leading the country in money? Do you think it matters at all this shift that the lab mouse, mostly Elon Musk's lab mouse? I don't. I don't think that there's, you know, what we could talk about the resource side of it, which again, I'm not a very big believer that that, you know, the money is going to be there on both sides. It's coming. But in the same way that Hollywood isn't moving the needle. These guys are moving the needle. They're viewed very similarly.
They're not real people. They're celebrities. They're not day-to-day people. The realities are different. I'm sure there's a handful of fanboys and fan girls are going to be like, oh, yeah, this is going on, but it's marginal. No. Elyana, do you think it matters these? Because that's the new celebrity in a lot of ways. I think at the margins culturally, it does matter in that Elon Musk has a following among young people.
And it makes it more culturally acceptable for young people to be on the right and cool guy. Yeah. I do think on the very margins, it matters. But on the whole, I do agree with Mike and Stephanie that, as a large-scale trend, no. It probably doesn't matter what these folks are doing. It's interesting with both my kids. They love Elon and no, they don't, which is interesting. And they loved him. Like, crazy. So it's interesting. It goes both ways. It cuts many ways.
I think Loudmouth are a problem, no matter what you do. But being a business celebrity has helped these guys in a huge way. You've got guys like Bill Ackman out there raising enormous amounts of permanent capital off of this. They realize that, like, they can cash in on it and they have. Yeah. And politics is cheap and easy because politicians are cheap to buy. And now, think about backing Trump. They now have, if he wins,
a direct line into the White House because he's a transactional guy. And there's a good chance they can get whatever they want from him. Maybe they can't. Maybe he'll turn on them, but they know they won't get what they want from Biden. All right. My last question for all of you. Democracy is the most important issue on the ballot for many people. Although it's one of these amorphous things. They feel pretty vague and nebulous compared to the price of milk or rent.
It feels very apocalyptic in many terms. The relentless message from Trump that it's all over. If Biden's wing, I think Doug Bergen, which is called Biden a dictator, that's the right wing media. The country's being invaded by foreigners on the left wing. Democracy is over. We're part of an autocracy under Trump. Do you think this big D democracy thing on both sides is a top of mind if this is what voters are going to vote for? Stephanie, I'll start with you and then Mike and then
Eliana. Listen, in many, many ways, it should be because without a functioning democracy, we have nothing. I just don't know if that's going to translate to the masses, especially the amount of voters and the voters in the states where it counts. Mike? I think the whole fight over democracy just tells us that both sides view this as an existential threat that these campaigns are zero
some. Most polling shows that it is Republicans who believe democracy is at threat more than Democrats, which I know scares a lot of people on, you know, there's different bubbles. But it's usually because they have a different version of democracy. They're just saying, why America to be my way and the end of democracy means the end of the America that I know.
Both sides are saying that. Eliana, finish this up. I think the Biden campaign's theory of the case is that voters in 2020 cast a moral vote against Trump that they did believe he had subverted democracy and they preferred the more normal candidate. And I don't really think that's right. I don't think this is moving the needle for people. I think people cast ballots in 2020 because there was a pandemic and Trump didn't handle it all that great. And I think they're likely
to cast ballots in 2024. And I'm talking about the independent voters who are going to decide this election on different issues that are top of mind, not democracy, January 6. Trump's claims about the election, but inflation and immigration and abortion. All right. I really appreciate it from all of you very thoughtful, great, great thoughts. And thank you so much. On with Cara Swisher is produced by Christian Castra Rocelle, Katari Yokem, Jolly Myers, and Megan Bernie. Special thanks
to Kate Gallagher, Kaelin Lynch, and Kate Furby. Our engineers are Rick Kwan and Fernando Aruda, and our theme music is by Tracademics. If you're already fun to show, you get to skip this debate and watch the new season of Bridgerton, which is much more enjoyable. If not, you have to be the one who picks up whichever one of these candidates falls and breaks their hip. Go wherever you listen to podcasts, search for on with Cara Swisher and hit follow. Thanks for listening to on with Cara
Swisher from New York Magazine, the Vox Media Podcast Network, and us. We'll be back on Monday with more. If you've been enjoying this, here's just one more thing before you go from New York Magazine. I'm Cory Sica. Recently, our writer Rebecca Tracer noticed something. Republican and right-wing women have been flourishing and prospering in the last year. From Marjorie Taylor Greene to Kristi
Nome, they're tough, they're chaotic, and they tend to have a really great teeth. They're also swirling in the orbit of Donald Trump as he seeks to seize the country with an iron fist this fall. Rebecca Wunderd is this empowerment, or are they just Trump's handmaidens? A broader end to explain to all of us what's going on here. Hello, Cory. I'm going to start asking really boring questions. Here's one. Which of the many exciting, recent dust-ups incited you to want to talk to and
write about right-wing women politicians? The first time I floated a version of this was after Katie Britt's post-State of the Union. But I can't say that at that point, I thought like I want to do a whole scope of Republican women. I was just really into Katie Britt because it was very old school in certain ways. The kitchen, it was very white suburban middle class, mommy presentation. But it was also like, gothic horror. There's blood of the patriots right here in my
kitchen with an apple. But it wasn't enough. I wasn't going to write a whole piece about Katie Britt. It might have been the infomercial that South Dakota governor, Kristi Nome, cut for the dental work she'd had done. Where I was like, what is happening with the public women? Right. So Kristi Nome did sort of a physical self-renovation to make herself either more palatable or more powerful. I'm not sure. When she began, she had a very no nonsense.
Boxy, Pelosi-esque, Hillary sometimes haircut, that sort of choppy haircut. And then in recent years, since she's become a little bit of a right-wing star, one of the things she's done is really change her look. Now, Donald Trump is very open about how he feels about women, how he evaluates women, and known as clearly remade herself into somebody who looks like somebody Donald Trump has expressed
physical appreciation for. So part of my question in this piece is, what does political power mean if you conform to those kinds of aesthetic standards? But then in some way that winds up diminishing the respect that the people who set those standards have for you. Your point is a great one that Trump hangs over a lot of this. Both, they're both soliciting him for a big job at the same time as they know he has standards. But also at the same time, Trump's big innovation was like performance
his power and they're enacting their own narratives. They've all become Trumpian in their own weird way. Yeah, and I have to tell you that it's very frustrating for me because I read about politics and I hate the thing where everything is about Trump. I always want to make it not about
Trump. But writing about these women really challenged that conviction in me because it is clear that at least for some of them, so many of the new behaviors they're enacting are in response to Trump are about the single demand in the Republican Party right now, which is showing him loyalty, fealty to this guy. Like all these people, Valentina Gomez, Laura Lumer, they're enjoying the fruits
of choice in career and motherhood. Like does this mean feminism won? Well, this is what's so dystopian and scary about their project is that they're all doing these things which are really fascinating, right? Marjorie Taylor Greene's lifting weights in a video and not behaving classically jimure and all of this sense of empowerment is absolutely what feminism gave to women. Okay,
so great. Here is its success, but also the party and the ideology that these women are using these feminist gains to promote is openly dedicated to the rolling back of those feminist gains.