Hello and welcome to notes in the week ahead. A JP Morgan Asset Management podcast that provides insights on the markets and the economy to help you stay informed in the week ahead. Hello, this is David Kelly. I'm chief strategist here at JP Morgan Asset Management. Today is May 22nd, 2023. I am shockingly comically bad at golf. However, that doesn't stop me from occasionally watching more gifted souls play the game. One of their techniques is to examine a pot from multiple perspectives.
They take a careful look at the green as they come up to mark their bowl, look at the putt from the side squat down to consider it from the opposite direction and generally scout out the lay of the land from all angles for myself since I'm generally wielding the putter playing my seventh or my eighth shot. I don't further taste, test the patience of my companions with such preparations.
However, I will admit that for the average golfer looking at a putt from multiple angles does yield useful information. A similar rationale can be applied to monetary policy decisions. Changes in monetary policy are among the most important drivers of stock and bond returns. Consequently, one of the questions we are asked most frequently is, where will the federal funds rate be at the end of the year? There are at least five ways of thinking about this question.
Each of them says something about the investment environment in particular, it's worth considering. Where does the fed expect it to be? Where does the futures market expect it to be? Where do investment professionals expect it to be? Where given optimal economic policy should it be? And finally, where is it likely to be? On the first question? The fed provides explicit guidance four times a year.
The Federal Open Market Committee, more commonly known as the FO MC when fully staffed numbers 19 people in total including seven members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the presidents of the 12 Regional Federal Reserve Banks. The FO MC meets eight times a year and before four of those meetings, the meetings held in March, June, September and December.
Each member provides their own forecast of some key economic variables and the level of federal funds rate at the end of the next few years.
This forecast of the federal funds rate is actually known as a dot plot with each dot signifying the opinion of one of the participants in March, there were only 18 participants as Governor Lele Brainard had recently resigned to take up another post at that time when considering the appropriate federal funds rate for the end of 2023 1 member thought the rate should be between 4.75% and 5%. 10 said between five and five and a quarter percent. Three thought between five and a quarter and 5.5%.
3 said between 5.5 and 5.75% and one thought between 5.75 and 6%. The median forecast was there for between five and five and a quarter percent. At that March meeting, the fed boosted the rate to a range of four and three quarters to 5% and it may raise it again by 25 basis points. Moving the rate up to that median end of year forecast on June 14th at the end of the next FO MC meeting, markets will have a new dot plot to consider.
In recent weeks, many fed officials have provided hints on the evolution of their views and based on this information, we expect the fed to leave rates unchanged in June and continue to provide a media and year and forecast of 5 to 5 and a quarter percent.
One interesting aspect of the current environment is that futures markets don't appear to believe this FO MC forecast in particular as of this morning, while the federal funds futures market was pricing in only an 18% shot of the fed raise rates of their June meeting. It was fully pricing in 1 25 basis point rate cut and a 90% chance of a second before the end of the year. At first, it seems very puzzling by forecasting a rate of 5 to 5 and a quarter percent for the end of the year.
Members of the FO MC are implicitly sending a message that they intend to raise the federal funds rate to an appropriately restrictive level and then hold it there into 2024. Some of them have even explicitly said this. So why doesn't the futures market believe them? Actually, this may not be entirely a case of the market doubting the fed the yield curve remains heavily inverted today with the federal funds rate of 5.08% a two year yield of 4.22% and a 10 year yield of 3.65%.
Long term rates have been driven down by global demand for treasuries and an expectation of slower growth, lower inflation and easier fed policy in the long run. However, as the long term rates have fallen, investors have been encouraged to buy shorter duration securities bending the entire yield curve downwards as treasury yields have fallen arbitrary, should have pulled derivative market yields down also.
And the federal funds futures market is of course a derivative market rather than an unbiased snapshot of the expectations of the average market participant. In other words, it's quite possible for the fed funds futures market to price in two rate cuts before the end of the year. Even if the majority of market participants don't believe that this is the most likely scenario.
And actually, survey data suggest that most market participants don't believe that this is the most likely scenario of the 72 respondents to Bloomberg's most recent survey of professional Wall Street forecasters published last week, 47 predicted the federal funds rate would end the year in a range of 5 to 5 and a quarter percent compared to 22. Predicting something higher and three predicting something lower. The survey did not ask what the fed should do from the perspective of optimal policy.
However, this is also a question worth considering since if the fed is making a mistake, they will likely realize it at some time and change direction. Optimal policy should reflect a judgment on the direction of economic growth on one side and inflation on the other. It should also consider what might be a reasonable trade off between the two and the risk the economy faces on growth. Recent days have been generally comforting.
April saw stronger than expected auto sales housing starts and employment numbers suggesting the real GDP has continued to grow in the second quarter. Despite wide set predictions of recession, that being said there are clear signs of diminishing momentum in the labor market. In addition, continued fiscal drag, slow labor force growth and increasingly courses business sector and tighter bank lending have all the potential to slow growth. Further.
This being the case, it is a very close call as to whether the economy will enter recession or not before the end of 2023. On the inflation front, the news continues to be encouraging year over year CP I inflation has now fallen from a peak of 8.9% last June to 5.0%. In April. Recent data show a stabilization in energy prices, air fares and hotel rates and declines in some food and used car prices.
This combined with very strong inflation in May and June of last year suggests that year over year inflation could fall to roughly 4.1% in May and to between three and 3.5% in June. Moreover with rental inflation also now peaking and it's possible that year over year inflation will remain below 4% through the end of 2023 before sliding steadily to 2% over the course of 2024.
While runaway inflation is and should be regarded as unacceptable by the Federal Reserve inflation that has a much more moderate levels and a steady downward track should not be alarming. It does not seem logical to precipitate a recession to accelerate this inflation decline.
Moreover, while there is some risk of renewed inflation pressure, most of the risks faced by the economy are of a more disinflationary hu in particular, we don't know how much further pressure could be put on regional banks by the current level of interest rates given gradual deposit outflows and questions about commercial real estate loans in particular, bearing all of this in mind, the Federal Reserve would seem to be well advised not to raise rates any further.
Indeed, the track record of monetary history in this century strongly suggests that the Federal Reserve has been too activist, having too, having little impact on their professed goals of modulating inflation and economic growth. But having a great deal of disruptive effect in first inflating and then bursting asset bubbles. A truly optimal policy would probably be an order to return to a neutral interest rate.
And in a vowel not to budge from that rate except in the case of financial emergency, allowing fiscal policy to be used to speed up or slow down the economy. Given all of this, what is the fed most likely to do? First, the mid June F MC meeting should be preceded by a relatively moderate employment report on June 2nd and a benign CP I inflation report on June 13th.
If this is the case and assuming that some resolution is found to the debt ceiling stand off between now and then the fed is likely to go on hold, reserving the option to increase rates further. Should inflation pressures pick up thereafter? The fed would like to hold rates at current levels to the end of the year. However, if inflation continues to decline. And the third quarter sees declines in both real GDP and payroll employment.
The FED could cut interest rates at their mid December meeting. Conversely, of growth in inflation merely continued to slow throughout 2023. The Federal Reserve will likely postpone rate cuts until 2024. It should finally be noted that when the fed does cut rates in 2024 it will likely feel the need to cut multiple times as there is no aspect of the current economic environment that suggests a revival in either growth or inflation next year.
For investors, it's important to assess all the angles on Fed policy. This year, the issue is not just what the Fed will do but whether they will be right in doing it easier monetary policy in the short run would be an unambiguous positive for the economy and markets. However, a policy that is too tight while it could result in unnecessary economic pain would also pave the way for easier policy next year.
Setting the stage for a more benign environment for financial assets, even if it's a tougher one for American workers and consumers. Well, that's it for this week, please tune in again next week. And if you have any questions in the meantime, please reach out to your JP Morgan representative. This content is intended for information only based on assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change.
No warranty of accuracy is given this content does not contain sufficient information to support investment decisions. It is not to be construed as research, legal regulatory tax, accounting or investment advice, investments involve risks.
Investors should seek professional advice or make an independent evaluation before investing the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate including loss of capital, past performance and yield are not indicative of current or future results forecasts and estimates may or may not come to pass. JP Morgan Asset management is the asset management business of JP Morgan Chase and Company and its affiliates worldwide.