Conversations About Censorship - podcast episode cover

Conversations About Censorship

Aug 25, 202242 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Glasses Malone and Peter Bas discuss censorship. When is it necessary? Is can culture a by product of censorship? Is it a violation of free speech and free press? Tune in as No Ceilings unpack it all.

Rate, subscribe, comment and share.

Follow NC on IG

@GlassesLoc

@Peter_Bas_Boss 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

M watch up and welcome back to another episode and No Sillers podcast with your host. Now funk that with your low glasses Malone. He told group group roof, saying, the dogs trying to stand at the radar. That's it, man. I uh, it sounds crazy. I don't know if this

makes medical sense, but I was telling you before. It feels like my body whenever it comes into contact with COVID At this point, it automatically goes into full self defense mode, so I could always feel it even if I'm not going to get sick or COVID is not going to You know, it's like a boxing mac. Like when you first started learning how to box, right, the most scariest thing in the world you fear is getting punched, so you overdefend your whole body, put your arms up,

and you start doing everything. But you know, the more you learn about boxing, you tend to you start learning how to defend real slick or like more effective to where you're still in position to punch like a great fighter. You know, a great fighter is the greatest fighters. Rather they can put themselves in defense just enough, but they're also ready to punch. Uh fighting like Adrian Browner, who I think is like a a first ballot Hall of Famer,

you know what I mean. I mean, when he's not, they're not gonna get the first ballot, even though he probably deserves it. But he's a Hall of Famer. Um. His his his main issue. And my boy Salas told me this a while ago. It takes him too long ago from defense to offense. Does that make sense? So like he's and then he goes on offense, and I feel like my body is doing that whenever he encounters COVID.

He goes into like everything blocks up, and it makes my whole body almost feel like it's shutting down versus, you know, fighting the battle. I don't know if that makes somebody enjoys my podcast that's in the medical field, and let me know if that sounds crazy. I mean, I just talked at length with the research scientist we had on like a year ago, like last week, and

I he sees a lot of stuff. I shot him up long form interview with a research scientists from Stanford to see what he thought about it, and he's like, there's you know, it's absurd not to look at this virus as synthetically produced at this point, just giving its nature and and the way I could describe the virus like as a boxing parallel, like in a touch and go.

It would be like if you were to take you know, a Joe boxer and extend his physical prime fifty years, so that he had fifty years of entering boxing knowledge and none of the physical deterioration, you know, like it was very much manipulated. The generations of evolution that happened in the lab occurred, you know, to the extent that it's like much more durable then it should otherwise have been,

and and much more um like like he evolved. You know, like when you when you say, like we'll see a new variant, it's because the original gene mutates slightly all the time. So like I might cough a thousand variants out nine and ninety nine of them are like birth defect variants, and one of them Superman, and that one will survive and it will make you know, offspring of that virus, etcetera, etcetera. It's more like attrition than whatever else.

So yeah, for whatever reason, your body just mine too. It's funny because you know, you're bringing up that scientist we had on the podcast the research scientists. Did you did I ever tell you they wanted to actually take that podcast down They was having problems black effect. That doesn't surprise me, But no, you never told me that. Yeah, they didn't. That's why I don't think I made a big deal. I'm good at not making a big deal

out of something unless it becomes a big deal. Um. And they wanted to take that down because they It's like this, like the one thing America don't have a lot of things right as a country. You know, the idea of it makes sense, but the way it's you know, I call it devolving, it doesn't really make it just keep moving into these really weird spaces of selfishness and not just was having this conversation. We'll get back into that. But the one thing they did have right was the

concept of freedom of speech. M It was like one of the endless concepts that made America great that a country, you know what I mean, It made the citizen as powerful as the government itself. Without it, you know, you you you in trouble. And it's a character. I've never seen any of his content until now, right, It's a character's name is Andrew Tate. I think he was a UFC boxer at one time, but he kind of goes around speaking and I don't know enough about his content.

I never really got into it. Just like, um, oh boy, rest in peace, that died in Georgia. The brother with the glasses. Oh yeah, Um, I don't understand why I'm drawing the black name. Don't that much of his content, Like I've consumed enough of you to understand this premise. Kevin Samuels, Kevin Sam's Rescued Peace, Kevin Samers, Um, but I've never seen any of his name. Andrew Tate, excuse me,

Andrew take. I haven't consumed enough of Andrew takes content. Like, but the stuff that I've saw, the little highlights was like kind of like caveman type thing, Like it wasn't bad, it was just super old primitive. And like I've seen all of the outlets, they're starting to like ban him right where. It's like, uh, Facebook and I G banned his account and now YouTube, if I understand correctly, I'm

not sure this is true. I don't want to throw YouTube under the bus, but you can't search for his channel, mom more is giving you like a a broken link. I believe YouTube banned two very very very prominent uh conservative host shows just last week. And it's weird, right because these are private businesses. Yeah, Like, these are very much private businesses, uh, I G. Facebook, Meta, you know

and YouTube their private businesses. But the problem is because of their economic growth and their influence, they become as influential to the government as the population as a mad thousand percent. I heard the most and I'm gonna send it to you, um the most powerful interview as far as information and X and explanation over the weekend I've

ever heard in my life. As far as describing it was, it was the author of a book called The Scandal of Money talking about basically like the last twenty years in the relationship between like world banks so to speak, government finance and large corporations, and how like I p o s used to be seven to one relative to mergers and acquisitions and now there's twenty eight mergers and acquisitions for everyone I p O. So as far as like looking at YouTube, Google, Facebook, Meta, um ship like

that these you know, the hyper amount of pumping of capital through quantitative quantitative easing efforts has turned these governed, these private companies into pseudo socialized government funded entities that are able to be manipulated and hide behind the private corporation status. I mean they obviously there's that section to thirty law that protects all the social media companies from you know, being libel I guess for what's on their platform.

But then they're also highly incentivized to manipulate and police what's on their platform actively, so they kind of walk both sides of the line simultaneously. And it's yeah, I mean, it's turning into seriously problematic issues for for people who don't know how to go, or don't care or have the time or whatever else. And there's a million of reasons why Americans aren't able to look at us at a topic. Consider how is this topic being given to me?

Where can I find other sources? How can I find that? And what does that mean? You know, it's very difficult to get true, reasonable objective reporting on things anymore. No ceilings, No ceilings, gl my man Peter in the spot under the weather a little bit, but we're gonna rock out anyway. Um. It's just what makes it weird for me, Like, I don't think nothing is objective, you know what I mean, I don't think it's I just think it was always healthy to hear both sides of any concept. Yeah, the

truth lies somewhere in the middle. I feel like reporting, you know, if if you're gonna just make it a simple spectrum, if purely objective, is zero and conservative or progressive, whatever the hell is positive ten and negative ten. I feel like fifteen years ago, twenty years ago, spinning slant would maybe encroached to like three or four, you know,

on the spectrum positive or negative. Now it starts at positive or negative eight and exists between eight and ten, Like like the the distance from neutral on both sides has grown tremendously. I agree, I agree, um, but it all goes back into that same concept like where I feel like I t Van van Lengthen about this all the time. But it's like I call that movement it's

like dr cockto you. Ever seen the the movie Demolition Man with Vester Stallone, Yeah, Westerny Snipes with the blood here, Yeah, where they all try to find this space of just positivity and niceness and blah blah blah that's not really nice at a certain place, it starts just becoming ridiculous. Yeah, Like that's how I described culture in the Bay Area when I lived in Oakland, and like, oh, four or five, Um,

but I tease him all the time like that. He had posted a video of some parents, you know, scaring their kids with a with a ghost. Yeah, and I thought it was funny, you know what I mean, Like I remember getting scared as a kid, and they just started to talk about how traumatizing they're traumatizing your kids, And don't I shut your bitch as up, you know what I mean? Like, I don't know if it's something

wrong with me or them, but there's something wrong. I'm gonna take a shotgun response and just go it's probably them. I don't get it. I don't like you want to and it's and and I saw another it was like a grip of comments on the social media post where they was thanking God for silence in his man and I'm like, he's so uninterested to me. I never went and saw his content, And why are you thanking God

for something you just don't have to look at? Yeah, That's that's what's so interesting to me about it right now, is that you described it like perfectly in an indirect fashion.

People are not concerned about what they take in because they think that they're brilliant and geniuses and able to cut through the bullshit, but they have no confidence in their fellow man, so they're like, well, I know it's bullshit, but you just can't let other people see this because they're such buffoonish morons that they're going to take it

and run with it and misinterpret it. So it needs to be taken down completely to protect all of us from the ocean of idiots, which we assume is everyone but ourselves. Mhm. I like it. Oh, I ain't gonna lie to you. Some of it is some stuff that's hurting my feelings, but I enjoy like it. It brings me to another depth of existence, you know what I'm saying. Like it kind of makes my existence a lot more complete.

And um, I was just having this conversation, and I promised myself I wouldn't bring it up until I took more time to do research. But I'm starting to think

the therapy turns everybody into white people. Oh yeah, I don't know what the serious sense of selfishness every last person, whether it's my homegirl, Debbie dad, It's like all of the conversations become I I I me me me me, I I I I. And it's like, you know, the act of being, the verb of being a human being is is humane, right, It's all consistent with caring about everyone else. Now, I think there is a place to find between the whole world and yourself. But I still

think the whole world matters. And when you constantly act like the whole world doesn't matter, that's when you start having problems. You know, like the best parallel that I can draw to in real life. That kind of illustrates this concept, because you're right, it's all about how I feel,

me me, me, and damn everybody else. It's like when you get to a freeway, we're emerging point and and most of the people are trying to merge in an orderly fashion, and then you get a handful as always, you know, the right lane that's expiring and merging in that will pull out race the front jam. It up for everybody else to create a traffic jams that they themselves can cut everybody else off and get ahead of

dozen cars, you know. And and that's kind of the societal activity that we're seeing happen now, Like everybody's and and therapist I don't give the like. I think that is the biggest pile of you know what for the participants involve there's never really much accountability. It's all about just feeling better by hook or by crook, and hopefully you don't feel so much better that you stopped coming.

So there's never seemingly an end point. I just I gotta do a lot more research to keep talking about it. But man, that ship bothers me back to the censorship ship. Then you get manned off of Twitter. That's a fact. And what's the actual post that got you man off of Twitter? Do you remember? I don't know. It was either a sarcastic comment or it was a specific study that was sent to me by that same uh researcher

that we had on the show. That was just an early, you know, incredible laboratory scientific study about one aspect of COVID. And I put it on Twitter, and then I said, and then some I saw some other posts about something, and I made some like really obviously sarcastic joke that was very obvious and very very watered down, and it wasn't even and that's why I don't think it was that. And somebody goes oh are you saying that? And I go, yeah,

that's clearly what I'm saying, being even more sarcastic. But sometime in the subsequent couple of hours I got banned. I'm assuming it's much more for the study than for the sarcastic remark, but but they won't tell me. I can't determine what's what it is. When I look back at my account, it's like largely wiped, it's still there. I mean, I still can't get on Twitter, but I

don't know. So some guy just um sued Twitter or Facebook, some uh COVID research scientists who got banned permanently, and it went on and on for a year, and he won and got back on because he got discovery of communications between the government and the platform where the government was attempting to use the platform overtly through clear language

in the emails exactly. And it was and that was what pierced the private corporation protection in court because they were like, well, now you're doing the bidding of the government, and the government cannot censor under the First Amendment. Therefore you cannot on behalf of the government. So you have to let this guy back on it and that was litigation that went on for about two years or no, went on for just uh just about one year, because that was a lot of bands. How do you feel

about is there anything that should be censored? Yeah? Well, yeah, certainly, I think that there's a lot of sexual stuff that should be censored because you can't necessarily like obviously, like pedophile ship is a crime, so you can't have that on there. That's not very ambiguous. But also like it's probably not great to have like ten year alls looking at Twitter porn and I don't know how obviously I'm not ten, so when I don't know how to make it, like if I'm a kid the seaport at nine and

ten years old, that's ah another story. Yeah, but like if you can't police who's seeing it age wise, there's probably you know, might not should be there. Otherwise, as far as just simple ideas and should go, no, I ain't. Just the only thing I would say is there's certain ship that people below a certain age probably certain just simply see whether it be obscenely violent or obscenely sexual or whatever. Outside of that, I don't think so at all.

I just think they just a bit too harsh on certain parts like women naked who the fund cares like when you're growing up seeing I don't know if this is normal in other people's community. When I was a kid, I saw my mom naked. I never thought it was attractive or none is my mom. He's like, man, mom put on some clothes and ever see my mom naked life?

And I think, and I know some of my mommies seeing the moms naked not like looking peeking, like your mom is a little bit free because it's your mom, you know what I mean, just like walks out to get something from the kitchen, you know what what I'm saying. But I think naked bodies is just a bit too I get the concept of sex being a little bit you know, to glorified, which I still don't know why that would matter to a seven year old. I don't

maybe they would. I don't know what then you be thinking at seven, because I didn't not think about sex at seven, but there was a different time. Yeah. But uh, like they just a bit too harsh on naked women, naked women bodies, naked bodies in general. I think, like we we we have games where you know, people are playing games and you're seeing people die before you see it in the naked body. Yeah, you know, kids are growing up in today's ever like we didn't see people.

I mean you had to grow up where I grew up back to see somebody get killed when you was young. Now today it's in every video game. You're seeing people killing each other. They shooting each Do you see in damn bodies before you see nakee people? I mean, so, I just think the fear of making this versus the fear of like violence is just to be unique, it is.

I know that that's been a conversation comparing like the United States application of censorship like FCC ship to um Europe, where Europe is like very lax on nudity and very restrictive on violence and worthy opposite here for whatever that is, I don't give a ship about Europe. It makes more sense to me, Like I don't think I would have as much fear of seeing somebody naked man seeing somebody

could be here blew off. Yeah, And like the manifestation if we're like talking about like logical extremes, like what would be the worst thing that I guess could happen, Like you're exposed to a bunch of nudity when you're young, and it fux you up and you grow up to be a slupt versus your disinsised of violence, you grow up to be a killer. Like, honestly, being a slut ain't really about letting somebody see you naked. Like, I think there's this weird premise of like strippers are slepts,

and I'm like, no, they're not there. They're fantises. They sell fantasy. Some of them trying to sell the reality. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying some people ain't just regardless of reality. That was a quote from like episode four. I'm trying, you know, they're trying to sell fake pussy for money. I'm trying to push real thick for free. Mean he no, Like so you know what I mean? Like, I think the stripp strippers get a

Strippers aren't sluts. They sell a fantasy that you could have action that a woman that is as you know, sexually, as the concept of Because it don't mean that they funk good because they stripped. They the two don't have nothing to do with each other. Now, strippers don't even use their real names. They use fantasy names. Yeah, yeah, they do alaja or yeah so but yeah, it's like, um, I don't think that person is a slut as much as somebody who actually slutting. Yeah, Um, yeah, I don't

quite get that. And citizenship was getting worse and worse. Um, well you heard a Project Veritas. No there. I guess the mainstream media describes them as a quote unquote like far right pseudo journalistic organization or whatever. But it's just like a guy and his team and they basically take um. They try to solicit like either hot mikes or um whistleblower content. And somebody came across Joe Biden's daughter's diary

and gave it to Project Veritas to publish. Project Veritas got the diary, they looked at it, they decided not to publish it, but it was reported that they were

in possession of it. So at like four in the morning, this guy's you know, apartment in New York, the fb I came through, full blown hardcore rad handcuffs, arrested, taken into custody, and took all of his ship just because he had it, and because he's reported a lot of ship that isn't particularly favorable for politicians or government agencies. And that's something that you know, we don't see through like years and years and years of history happening in

the United States with the with the press. Mm hmm, I'm definitely so. Do you think that the masses of American population are the masses are ignorant? Right? To some degree? They don't have knowledge of pretty much some of these things. I don't think it's I don't think there's stupid. I think people don't have enough time for sure, Like you have to have time to read, you have to have

time to research, you have to have time to formulate thought. Yeah, I mean you could just think anything, but to formulate a a whale thought out thought, you need time. And yeah, when most people have children, most people get jaws, most people get married. You don't have enough time for yourself to fully think ideas out. So you tend to take whatever you feel represents you the most and run with it. Right.

It's easier, right, It's it's easier, and you end up and people, you know, they have this weird thing to where you know, now once they're running with it and they're running into things, right, they're starting to run in the things they don't agree with. But now it would take too much work and energy to rebuild and go

into something else totally. And I think that also either contributes to or is combined with this reality of just like human behavior, where if you believe in something for a long time, like you're comfortable with that belief, and when that belief is challenged very overtly, you're gonna exist that because you don't want to believe that a you could be wrong or be whatever it is that you are talking about. Their like like, what are the ramifications

of that belief actually being wrong? What? What? What does that mean for me and the people around me? And it's funny because I'm the same way like with people, like I tend to challenge people think Like I said, people think that I'm what's the name it's uh, what is it called? It was a word specifically that I like to challenge or just argue with people. And it's weird because I don't like, oh, yeah, I've called you a troll for a hundred years and I'm really not

like I'm not at all. But it's another word. What's the what's the professional word that they use? Uh, contrarian, contrarian And I'm not like, I don't like to this. I just have more time to I invest more time into ideas than most people noticed me, and you rarely argue like that's true because I pretty much know you put enough thought into it. And whatever we're talking about, if I'm arguing with you about it is because I

know you've put in the thought. Now, that's not to say that if I if I because the thing like when we talk about concept of racing America, we argue all the time. And it's not because I don't think you don't know because you're white. I just think you don't know because you just don't know, particularly that only you don't have any concept. But it's certain times I'm gonna not Pete that ain't right. But then most of

the times I'm not. I don't like, I don't troll you because I think you take time to know what the funk you'll be talking about most people, Like I had this conversation on Twitter and I was saying that um, Tim Duncan was a greater player than Kobe Bryant, right, and it's splitting here because they're real close. Oh man, That I'm sure went over very well, you know, But I was saying and I kept I made it simple. I said, Tim Duncan, right, is a better power forward

than Kobe Bryant is a shooting guard. I's had a greater career. And it's tough for people to understand that because it's a passion that goes behind what they like. It's it's almost to the point to where it's like what I like has to be the best or I can't like it. Like I don't feel like that. I can like stuff that's not the best because I don't care. I just like it full places that other people don't like, and I enjoy it. I don't given what y'all say.

I enjoy it. I'm gonna go there regardless. I think Wendy's. I love Wendy's. Wendy's has the best burger on the mainstream franchise. No, not like not counting five guys. Yeah, I agree with me. I actually enjoy it. Now. I wouldn't argue you that Wendy's is the greatest burger. I said they have the best burger. I enjoyed their burgers

the most. Your favorite huh? Your favorite? Yes? But when I have these other conversations, so do you think it's like these companies ideas at that point the center because it doesn't go with their theory. Like everybody in these companies admit it cannot think like people people. You know that. I think you'd be very surprised. Yeah, I think that you're dealing with very niche personality types and very boutique regions of the country. So you get like this distillation

of echo chamber effect. Like if you're an elite programmer that's good enough to be programming at one of these companies and you're actually physically writing what's basically your interpretation of an instruction for an algorithm and your team is that's a very very like minded group of people. Um, it's a small area of of the broader economy and a small cultural area of the country. Um, that's largely the time. I just I literally and not to cut

you off. We just had a conversation where I'm saying, the l g B t Q, the the plus community, right, they have so much way on public thought and what the government is doing. The country is turning into a communist country, is becoming the voice of a small community starting to project everything onto the masses. Yeah, that's a like I My opinion of that is A is A

is a little bit in verse. I look at that as kind of like an on steroids version of the way I look at a lot of the race driven rhetoric in the country where you have people that are wealthy, powerful white liberals by and large that don't really give a ship one way or the other about Black America or gay America or Transamerica. But they know that they can capitalize on the fact that other people might, so

they will use those communities as leverage to look good. Yeah, to look as the concept of righteous or just that's my personal pain. I could be flat as wrong. That's just how I see it, right, I think you're right. I think you're I mean, I do think yeah, I think you're right. I don't think it's every last one, but I do think the majority. That's how it is. Yeah, and and and the majority. When you're talking about that level of sway, the majority defines the apparatus. Mm hmmm.

Do you think that the public so being the public is not concerned? Right, because remember this happening to fair con too. Fairy con got banned off of these sites. Oh yeah. Do you think it is a helpful thing to humanity? Or is it a confusing thing when they when they start the censor certain person that these that are strong or that are captivating. I think that it's very, very bad to do. I think that the mystery is

oftentimes far worse than the reality. If I was, you know, somebody who just said the most horrible things you could think of all the time on social media, had a large audience that for whatever reason, not every person in your audience is listening to you for the same reason, and not everybody in your audience is walking away with

the same message. But if you suddenly banned me, well then you're going to get a romanticized caricature you know, of the ideas that I was talking about at that point. M you can't even monitor it at that point. No, you're dealing with like the reality of what I would be saying versus like somebody's hypothetical case that I might have been saying, you know, and those two things are gonna be really different. Mm hmm. It's positives about the sensorship. Besides,

people just feel better, No, they really aren't. At any time that you bury the individual's ability to think. There aren't a lot of positives to that because because you you don't even learn to properly criticize. You don't even learn why you should dislike a bad idea because you don't even see it. You know, you don't even you don't even grow as a man. That's a great point.

One of my boys, my boy lc Um from off the East Coast, he's from one of the Caribbean islands based out of the the East coastal came to American and the East Coast, and he's telling me about this particular movement and I didn't see what was bad about it. He was telling me. He's like, I'm telling you ged rhetoric is bad and it's crazy because it is a pro black movement. And I didn't see it because I felt the just or the initial message of it. But over the time I started to realize what was wrong.

The difference with me is I got a chance to think about it. And the difference with me also is I didn't just jump head first because I like something. It's like, all, let me just look at a little bit more, you know what I mean. Like, And then over time I started realizing I had to call or C and said, hey, man, you was right. Hey, I didn't pique this I told you, and I was like, damn, you know what I mean. It's it's such a weird place to be, you know, when you're trying to organize

human beings. You know what I mean? And too, I guess that's why my fear as a leader. I never wanted to lead the masses because I would be a lot more you know. Um, I'd be a lot more like a like a like a parent. I don't believe in explaining everything the human beings. Yeah, that's probably why I'm not a parent, because I don't want to explain

everything to you all the time. Sometimes I want to explain something to you when there's things, but sometimes your children they have to know to just listen and trust you. And if you always have to explain something, it could you know, where how we grow up. It could cost you your life versus you just listening. You know what I mean. It's not simple in every other world. And

that's how I feel. Even like if I was, I would be a lot more like a dictator than a president, Like I would go with what I know is best for humanity, and I see people doing that. But the difference is I would be out front with it. Yeah, I wouldn't really hide it, and whether it's right or wrong,

I don't think people like that. No. I think there's a huge difference between leading people to a point of their own free choice and leading people to a point of your free choice, you know, And we've kind of cross that bridge a lot in this country. It's the social engineering is so severe. It's like, okay, we as

though whatever like right now is making all decisions. The progressive you know movement, we think it's best for all of humanity to go specifically there, and we're going to lead all of them there, whether they like it or not, because we think it's best that they go there, Whereas in a more healthy environment, you'd say, all right, we're gonna lead people to a place where they can constructively

make the most of it for themselves. And then we'll start to see the negative ramifications that we're seeing the negative ramifications of that in the economy right now for sure. So we'll start to see it more societally if it continues over the next ten years. Okay, So I think I remember talking to you. You don't really identify as a conservative, even though some of your views line up there. Um, if you had to see three major figures in the

liberal movement be be uh banned on social media? Who do you feel rhetoric is just as damaged liberal standpoint? What's interesting is that question is defined almost as much by the content that they put out as it is by like, I think the most impactful like liberal content mechanism is the censorship. You know, I think it's less about what they do say than what they don't say.

But I would say, whoever the leading voice in the environmentalist movement is, I would say Fauci or whatever the leading account is for a lot of this quote unquote health and safety bullshit, which has been a train wreck. And so it's at that point you would hold them liable for the economic breakdown of America over the last well we've we've been heading there, but then now we just it's just the steam got shortened with real fast. Yeah, things have changed a bit, uh and the last few years.

To me, the most dangerous man in America is Larry Fink. Who is Larry Fink. Larry Fink is the CEO of black Rock, which is a giant um fund like investment fund. I think they control between like eight and eleven trillion dollars in assets, and he's the spearhead of this movement

called e s G, which is Environmental social governance. It's basically a credit score system that is pretty opaque that he and his team defied line where based on your E s G score, this massive behemoth of the financial industry will either choke you off from access to money or you know, fire hose and into a car, you know, money into your company. And that's that's unbelievably damaging. Uh. For example, like on the environmental stuff that's obviously green

related ship. So at one time a very very high score, highly rated company was Tesla because there you know, on board with the green agendas, an electric car company. When Elon Musk proceeded to attempt to buy Twitter, he lowered the E s G index score of Tesla below that of ex On Mobile because of the social governance aspect of him attempting to manipulate the censorship apparatus within Twitter. That's to me, you're you're now at a companies because

of the S and the G part. You're firing, not hiring, making determinations of people's lifestyles based off of the way they think about ship that you think about. That's a huge manipulation of the economy and society at large. When you're talking about thousands of companies. That to me is the most dangerous man and movement in this country right now. And we haven't even begun to see the ramifications of that right now. It's like the foundations being laid pretty extensively.

If that starts to really come home to roost, the country is gonna change radically, Uh, for the worst. What is the worst version of America look like to you? Um, it probably looks a lot like China. No middle class, Um, you, extremely wealthy people, entirely too many people living below. Yeah, it means it kind of starts to look like California. I mean, California has homogenized so many verticals of industry. It has tremendous state control over economies, over who can

develop where and what. There's a housing shortage, there's concentrations of enormous wealth that nowhere in the world has ever seen before. And now California has a lower per capita poverty rate in Mississippi, and California has the fifth largest economy by itself in the world, which means it's entire to too many rich people or entirely too few people that are so obscenely ridiculously rich. Is very few people with money and entirely too many people would not enough, absolutely,

and there's and there's not enough. There aren't enough simple net worth millionaires because including you know, your house, your comp and in your ship whatever. Yeah, being net worth a million and a half isn't like insane that there's very little of that in California. There's billionaires disproportionate, and then there's people who just proportion Yeah. Good looking out for tuning into the No Sellers podcast. Please do us

a favorite, subscribe, rate, comments, share. This episode was recorded right here on the West coast of the USA and produced by my homeboy A King for the Black Effect Podcast Network and not Heart Radio. Yeah.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android