1791 - "Bolt Muncher"

No. Adam Curry, John C. Dvorak. It's Sunday, August 17, 2025. This is your award winning give on Asian media assassination episode 1791. This is no agenda. Grabbing the red carpet. And broadcasting live from the heart of the Texas Hill Country here in FEMA region, number six in the morning, everybody. I'm Adam Curry. And from Northern Silicon Valley, where everybody thinks Putin won. I'm John C. Dvorak. It's Crackpot and Buzzkill! In the mornin'! Oh, man. It's, uh, it's tiring. It's tiring.

It's just tiring. Everything is so tiring. Everybody's all, WHOA! It's no good what he did! Oh, no! He is yahoo! That's pretty much all I've heard for the last, uh, 36 hours. Perseverance! So, did you see Margaret Brennan? I have Margaret Brennan. I have the clips. With Rubio? I have everything. I'm ready to go. If you want to hear it, I got them all. I think Rubio holds his own, but I don't know what it is. I think people dislike him, but I think he's one of the best at arguing.

Well, so let's, because, um, yes. Everything was rolling this morning on the clip machines. And we start with Margaret Grennan with, Brennan. Grennan? That's her new name. Margaret Grennan. Margaret Grennan. Well, she looks more like a Grennan than anything. She does. Yeah, she does. Here's, uh, here she is with Fiona Hill just to get us, uh, get us, get us into the mood. Good morning, Margot. Well, Fiona, you were an advisor, uh, during that infamous Helsinki summit in 2018.

You've spoken about that in the past. I wonder... Stop, stop, stop, stop. We have to mention, so everyone's predisposed to thinking this way. Okay. That, that, that this woman who used to work for Trump, but she's with Brookings. Yeah, Brookings Institute. Yeah, the, the, the very subversive. The Brookings is right up there with the Council on Foreign Relations and, uh, uh, the WEF and they're the ones that Nixon thought should be burnt to the ground in this operation.

Yeah, well, that's, that's the obvious reason why we have to put her on first, just to get into the mood of, you know, of the globalist mainstream media, the globalist mainstream media who do not like at all, at all, at all, what is taking place here. What do you think about how this Alaska summit compared? Well, it sucked, of course. Well, obviously quite different, um, in, in many respects.

Um, part of it was, uh, the fact that they decided to skip, uh, the one -on-one meeting and, uh, the lunch. I mean, these are usually part of this sort of set of, uh, summits like this. As an outrage, they skipped the lunch. I'm not sure they skipped the lunch. I was looking at the schedule. There's no evidence. There's no evidence. They were gone. They were out one-on-one for three hours. I don't know what she's talking about. And during that period of time, the lunch was served.

Well, but you know, somebody starving him out. Somebody left the highly confidential menu documents on the printer, which just shows you how horrible this whole administration is. I desperately. The menu was leaked. I desperately tried to find the clip and all I could find was Hindu, Hindu, Hindu times and times of India. And those are just AI generated, uh, slop, uh, videos. No one really did a story on NPR did an article, but no one really went all the way to do a, Oh, I can't believe it.

Clutching my pearls a bit. So anyway, let's continue with the, uh, this bit with Fiona. And the press conference obviously was more of an announcement or a set of announcements, presentations by both leaders, uh, much more by president Putin and more of a commentary, uh, by president Trump. So there wasn't that, uh, free for all of, uh, press questions, which I'm sure was a bit disconcerting for you and others who were present there, um, as Alaska.

Very disconcerting for you, Margaret, that you couldn't ask questions. Uh, but the optics, uh, weren't exactly great as, uh, congressman Crow has laid out, uh, for the United States and for president Trump again. I mean, again, different, but although it was presented as perhaps a show of power by being at, uh, a U S air force base with the fight, uh, passing of the B 50 twos and other fighter jets, it did certainly look much more like a show of appreciation for Vladimir Putin.

And so the optics were really much more favorable to Putin than they were to the United States. It really looked like Putin had set the agenda there, the narrative, and in many respects, the tone for the whole summit meeting. What an idiot. So first of all, it was a B two bomber. B 50 to like the B 52 is a rock lobster. No, there was the B two bomber. Yeah. And I thought the staging was phenomenal. You're a big Alaska, 2025. You got your red carpets. You got, Oh, the staging.

The whole thing was very, it looked like a TV show. They had the whole thing set up that way. It was set up as Putin had to walk across to the, to meet a mile to meet his, his hosts. President Trump's a very big power move. And he was happy. He was like, I will say, I'm not entirely convinced. This was the actual Putin. I agree. I looked at a whole bunch of different. I agree. I'm like, I don't know if this is the Putin that, that would know because there was a lot of talk.

In fact, there was a couple of people on Twitter saying they should shoot him. And I'm surprised that they haven't been kicked off the platform for these kinds of things. Shoot Putin. Yeah. There's a bunch, there's a couple of lunatics. I went to look at this, this, well, I can't remember the guy's name. Cause I had long ago blocking me some, some lefty and yeah, the advocated shooting him. And I found that to be distressing. And the, I think there was a, there was a question as to the safety.

So I wouldn't be surprised me in the least if Putin, if that was not, that was the Putin double. It didn't look like him. He didn't have the same kind of scowling mouth. His cheeks were a little puffier, which of course is because of the cancer that he has. We all know that he's dying. He's been dying ever since this show began. Yeah. So, but I guess if he was carrying the official message, then what difference at this point does it make?

But still a little disappointing to see what I clearly thought was not the real Putin. Anyway, continue with Fiona and then we'll go back to Jason Crow, who she was referring to. Just again, so we can get the stage. Who was a Democrat Trump hater from Aurora, Colorado. Yes. That's why it's so fun to listen to. One more from Fiona here, because, you know, we're so we're just, we're just out in sense. I tell you, you know, the president has a team of advisors around him.

And in a traditional administration, those advisors would be setting the policy. They would be planning the optics and they would be thinking through that. Do you think that the president's team set him up for success here? Oh, goodness gracious. Well, it may well have been that one of the demands, because we've heard from Secretary Rubio, which I have to say, I think was a very fair assessment of where things are.

So it may well have been that one of the demands by the Russians to make any progress in moving further forward was to actually have that kind of show of pomp and pageantry that basically marks Putin's re-entry. Hold on a second. When you fly our awesome B-2 bomber, because it just looks cool. Not on the ground. Those wonky legs don't look cool. But when it's flying over, I mean, that to me said, yeah, bitch, look up. I mean, how can anyone see that differently?

Oh, oh, we're honoring you, Mr. Putin. I don't understand how you can. That can be the takeaway. If you've got a skewed perspective. No. OK. Into international affairs. Maybe the Russians said to them in Moscow, either to Steve Whitkoff or to Secretary Rubio or to anybody else that basically they wanted to have a major U.S.-Russia bilateral summit appearance before they would move on to the nitty gritty of anything else in Ukraine.

That's, you know, to give them all the benefits of the doubt there. But it all now depends on what comes out of this. And I think, again, Secretary Rubio made it very clear that it's not going to be easy. He was certainly downplaying any expectations of a major breakthrough, but he did say that there was something that might be possible. I think that's what's going to be the proof of whether this was actually worth all the effort that they went to in Alaska or not. Blah, blah, blah, blah.

OK, so I'm playing these in reverse order just to get all the idiots out of the way. So now we go to Jason Crow. On Ukraine, you know that the U.S. intelligence assessment is that the battlefield is turning in Russia's favor, despite the fact that Putin has to rely on Iran and North Korea to keep this thing going. President Biden. By the way, I love that little, oh, they have to rely on Iran and North Korea, which is a kinky little country. And Iran's got issues on their own.

But somehow the giant Russian Federation has to rely on those two. Otherwise, they'd fall apart. Give me a break. But this is well, we'll get to with analysis. Let's just take it. Take it as the hits come here.

But this is well, we'll get to with analysis. Take it as the hits come here. Take it as the hits come here. But this is well, we'll get to with analysis. Take it as the hits come here. But this is well, we'll get to with analysis. Take it as the hits come here. They keep on saying they're dedicating time. They're making it a priority. They're focusing their attention on it.

In any negotiation, when you're trying to end an armed conflict, there's nothing more important than understanding what motivates your adversary. What is making Vladimir Putin tick in this instance? Vladimir Putin does not care about the amount of time that we're allocating. Does not care about a B-2 bomber flyover. Does not care about a lineup. Well, wait a minute. If this was all kowtowing to Putin, why doesn't he care? Then it was a failure, I guess. If he doesn't care, these people.

About the amount of time that we're allocating does not care about a B-2 bomber flyover. Does not care about a lineup of F -22 fighters rolled out. He doesn't care about any of that. What Vladimir Putin cares about is basically three things. He cares about economic pressure in the form of sanctions. He cares about political and diplomatic isolation, being a pariah state. And he cares about military defeat. Those are the three things that will end this conflict.

If he feels pressure on all of those three fronts, and this administration continues to be unwilling to do anything to assert pressure in any of those three areas. Okay, there's no sanctions or anything like that. But when did the representative from Colorado become such an expert on what Putin cares about? Other than just the drinking club, I guess? Well, he's an ex-military guy. He's on the House Armed Forces Committee. So I guess he's an expert.

But then he just hates the, everyone in the M5M just hated the red carpet. This one, this one. That is only for our Hollywood celebrities. We don't do it for foreign heads or pariah states. They were freaked out about the red carpet. They did not like it. Look at what happened, people. U.S. military personnel in uniform. In uniform. Oh, no. Literally were on their hands and knees rolling out a red carpet for the most murderous dictator of the 21st century. Somebody who is kidnapped.

The most murderous dictator. I thought that was Netanyahu. He got it all wrong. And is holding prisoner tens of thousands of Ukrainian children. Somebody who started this whole war. This both sides-ism that the administration is engaging in. That both sides need to come to the table and negotiate. Ukraine is the victim. They are the victim. They didn't start this war, Russia did.

And somehow we keep on acting like Vladimir Putin deserves to be brought out into the open like any other head of state. This is a historic embarrassment and defeat for U.S. foreign policy. Oh, goodness. These people are living in the 70s. Or at least their policies. Before we even get to Rubio, which is next. Did you see Swalwell doing the rounds? Yes, Swalwell was doing the rounds. I saw this. Wearing a Ukrainian T-shirt, kind of a drab olive. Pretty much Zelensky's night shirt.

Does he think that beard looks good on him? And he should brush his teeth. Maybe that's just video artifacts, but looks a little skanky. Anyway, here's his... He looks like a bum. Congressman, your sense of where this goes from here? Well, if you're Europe, you're quite worried now. Because you just saw the President of the United States achieve zero. And they will have to ask themselves, what more are they willing to do?

Knowing that they too could be thrown under the bus if Russia ever moved farther west. But as far as objectives, I was hoping to hear that there would be a trilateral meeting. That didn't come out of this. I was hoping to hear there would be a ceasefire. That didn't come out of this. That would be proposed or exchanged by both sides. That didn't come out of this. Look, Alicia, I don't know if Donald Trump is or is not a Russian asset.

I do know that at press conferences like this, and like at Helsinki, he certainly acts like one. And that is cold comfort for anyone in the United States, particularly in our military, that the Commander-in-Chief would be so flattering of and so charming to a ruthless dictator like Vladimir Putin. So where was he? Hold on a second. Where was he flattering to Putin? Putin's the one who was flattering him. Red carpet, baby. The red carpet was flattering. The pomp and the hello, my friend Vladimir.

It was just flattering. They didn't treat him like the murderous dictator that he is. And we just need to reset for one moment. Because it does not. It's history just gets papered over, as it always does. And it works in some cases. Well, I have some. I have some reminder clips here. Well, why don't we do a reminder clip before we get to Rubio? OK, well, here's the reminder clip. This was on. This was on BBC. No. I think it might have been BBC, but it could have been. Yeah, it was BBC.

This is Trump Putin anal. Oh, anal. Not the not the regular opener. No, this is the Trump Putin anal. You and this is the Russian United Nations ambassador. And he is. By the way, if you're new to the show, if you're new to the show, that's short for analysis. It's just a long running joke. Don't be a joke. I use that term because it's easier. It makes the length of the clip name shorter. It's the only word you spell correctly because it's all uppercase just to make sure I know what it is.

But I'm with you. Just just helping people who are new to the show. Oh, I was just naming the clip. I didn't even think of the double entendre. I know because we're beyond that. But there's sometimes there are new listeners. Oh, I see. We have a bunch of people with dirty minds. OK, well, here's the anal from Russia. There is a different standpoint. And there are a lot of people who are now in Mariupol and who are very happy about this fact. And you can't deny it.

So it depends very much on your standpoint. And also you should take into account the views of about seven million Ukrainians who found refuge in Russia after this whole thing started. They also have their position. They want to be to be identified as Russian speakers. They want to preserve their belief in canonic Orthodox Church. They don't want to be harassed by the Zelensky regime. This is also their choice and it should be respected.

There is a view, as you will well know, that President Putin has to a degree played President Trump here. President Trump only a few days ago mentioned the potential for serious consequences if the fighting didn't end serious consequences for Moscow. They've gone away now, haven't they? President Trump is undoubtedly a clever man. He takes decisions on the basis of what he hears and what he processes, what he understands.

So he now has a very good opportunity for an in-depth discussion with President Putin. I think this is fruitful for him. And this is fruitful for us as well to better understand each other's standpoint. And it's absolutely no surprise to me that President Trump made certain conclusions that would change his positions, which he took based on some distorted information and even a misinterpretation of certain of our statements. And who is this guy who's talking?

He's the ambassador of the United Nations from Russia. Ah, okay. All right. But where's the history lesson? I have one more clip from him where he talks about the history. And then I want to play Mearsheimer, who's another character in the analysis play. So let's play two. The European position now, the EU's top diplomat, Kaya Kallis, once the prime minister of Estonia, has said, quote, the harsh reality is that Russia has no intention of ending this war anytime soon.

And she sees the summit in Alaska as President Putin's way of extending this process without actually resolving the fighting at all. That's true, isn't it? Leading the witness. Maybe it's true according to the distorted vision of Ms. Kallis and her colleagues. Because the problem in Europe now is that they don't have a strategic vision about what's happening. They have only Russophobia and the notion of zero-sum games.

In their mind, and that's not something that you will have a positive outcome during the negotiations. So you know that we, from the outset, we were against any military exercises, any military efforts to solve the crisis. We were making a lot of proposals which were rejected. And then it started when it started. We didn't have any other choice. Well, it started when you invaded Ukraine, and since then 13,500 civilians in Ukraine have been killed.

With all due respect, it started much earlier, in 2014, when the West created anti-Russia as a result of anti-constitutional coup. And it's very hard to deny it. And that's the problem of Europe, that you want to show that it all started in 2022. And it didn't happen in the vacuum. There were a lot of things prior to this. And it's very good that President Trump now realizes that it has certain history which should be taken into consideration. Isn't it good? Briefly, if I may, with one more.

Is President Putin willing to meet President Zelensky in the coming days and weeks? President Putin never denied the possibility of meeting President Zelensky. Is he willing to meet him? That's a slightly different... I'm not President Putin. I can't say whether he will. Would you like him to? I'm judging from his statement, and I'm processing his statement. So, he said that such a meeting should be well prepared, and we are not yet there. So, that, I think, is where we stand right now.

Dmitry Polyansky, thank you very much. Russia's first Deputy Permanent Representative to the United Nations. So, the piece that is just... I mean, he's alluding to it. But let's just call a spade a spade. The United States, the nutjobs in the... I'll just call it the Victorian Newlands of the world. They're the ones that started this. They're the ones that have hated Russia with just complete disdain. F the EU, by the way, was what she said. Who cares? We just want to get these Russians.

We just want the Russians mainly to steal their stuff. You know, what was it? Five billion from Chevron? It's like, we're the bad guys here. And now we're trying to set it all straight. But no one remembers. No one remembers past 2022. There's no more history. And we're just two old boomers who remember stuff. Well, it's because this actually happened during the show era of the No Agenda show. Yes, it was a fine era. We witnessed the whole thing. We had Nuland gotten your phone tapped.

We had John Brennan, the head of the CIA in Ukraine. Let's not forget the downing of the Malaysian aircraft, which was consistently blamed on Russia, thanks to open source intelligence, such as Bellingcat. Whatever happened to them? Yeah, well, the funding stopped. No, the whole thing was set up by us. And we're trying to get out of it. And we want to forget these past facts. Can we play the Mearsheimer clip? Who was Mearsheimer?

Mearsheimer is a professor who's been in and out of the news a lot. He's probably anti-Trump, probably a Democrat, but he's got good analysis. And this was part of a long podcast, one of the spinoff podcasts. And these guys, they always get these guys on. And he thinks Trump didn't know what the hell was going on. This is only part of a long hour or so of him yakking away. But this is a good part. But just as a summary, he believes Trump didn't know what the hell he was doing.

He didn't understand the situation. He's very short term memory, doesn't know anything about the 2014 thing, really. It's just a lot of this, a lot of that. And he makes the assertion that Trump made a mistake when he promised secondary sanctions on the oil going to India and China and found a way out of his own dilemma with this meeting. And now he could back off of that idea because he realized it wasn't a good one. And here's some summary that he kind of wraps with.

I think there's one very important dimension to what Trump said, that we don't want to lose sight of. Yeah, it's called dimension B. And that is, I think he's passing the torch to Zelensky. I think in a very important way, Trump has come to understand that he can't settle this one. There's no way he can agree Trump to a peace agreement and convince the Ukrainians, the Europeans, and the Western foreign policy establishment that that's the smart thing to do.

He can't convince Putin to agree to a ceasefire. So what can Trump do? And of course, what Zelensky says he should do is put secondary sanctions on Russia. And we can talk about that because this meeting was in good part about secondary sanctions and Trump's interest in secondary sanctions in the past. But Trump understands. He was asked afterwards what this means for secondary sanctions. There are going to be no secondary sanctions, at least at this point, says Trump.

So the sanctions are off the table. The ceasefire is off the table. Trump has basically agreed with Putin that you got to go directly. He said this, you got to go directly to a peace agreement. So Zelensky comes to the White House. What does this mean? He's basically saying, I believe that Zelensky and the Europeans can now sit down with Putin and they can work this out. If they need me, I'll be there. But it's up to them.

I'm not going to cut a deal and then try and force it down the throats of the Ukrainians and the Europeans because they don't want to go along with me. So if you listen to the press conference, this is what you were playing. He said it's ultimately up to them. He said he's going to call NATO. He's going to call the Ukrainians. But what happens is, and these were his words, it is ultimately up to them. But that's exactly what the truth is.

And I think before we get to Rubio here, the Europeans don't want peace. They have no economy. As Macron said, war economy. As Pieper said, we're going into debt. We're changing our car companies into tank building companies. They need an enemy. So whatever the outcome, it has to be unsettled because they need to continue to milk the European citizenry of their money and print it, which is the same thing. It's also stealing. So that they can continue to have any kind of economy.

And maybe President Putin also kind of needs that himself, the way the sanctions are and not on Swift. Yeah, you can still sell oil to China and India and doesn't really want secondary sanctions. But the entire Western, and so are we, by the way, we're now selling the gear. Well, at least we're not giving it away. No, that's better. But there's no outrage over our stuff killing people. Okay. And that was the whole NATO 5%. It was first 2%. We're not doing it.

Then I want five because I really want three and a half. He gets three and a half. They're buying it from us. They make hundreds of billions of euros available to buy our stuff. So we're right now in a global war economy. And we actually have another out. We don't really need this one because we've got China, Taiwan, China, ships, submarines, bases. So we're covered. And I don't think any of these people don't really want a deal. At least not one that doesn't include war machinery.

Your thoughts, John C. DuBois, I go. What say you? Well, we have both concluded that the Europeans are warmongers in general. They have a war mentality. They've always had this. It's been a problem with them all the time. It's one of the reasons our country was formed in the first place. True. And to get away from them. And that's where I find the father says, let's stay out of these guys business because they're just going to kill each other. That's what they like to do.

And that's what they're going to continue to do. I see no evidence of the contrary. That's going to change. So Marco Rubio, who, you know, of course, if you walk around Fredericksburg and say Marco, oh, can't trust him. There is a snake. He's a snake in disguise. And why is that? I have no idea. What has he done that snake like? Dancing. He was a dancer. He was a dancer. Stripper. Chippendale. I didn't know if he was a Chippendale.

He probably didn't make it to the Chippendale leagues, but he's very gracious in this interview. First by for a while to start off. Well, first of all, he sounds like, oh my God, I can't believe I have to talk to this woman here. This is horrible. Yes, he does not like talking. And then he just skips over the whole what really started this, which is kind of gracious towards his predecessors, which President Trump is not. But here we go. Good morning to you, Mr. Secretary. I really why am I here?

Good morning to you, Mr. Secretary. Good morning. Thank you. Vladimir Putin did not give President Trump the ceasefire he sought. And now Putin says the root causes of the conflict have to be resolved in a peace agreement. Doesn't the root cause the fact that Russia invaded in the first place? Oh, boy. Oh, boy. Well, ultimately, yeah. But I mean, what he means by root causes is long historical complaints that we've heard repeatedly. This is not a new argument.

He's been making this for a long time. And it's the argument that it's Western encroachment. I don't want to get into it. It's just so long. But the bottom line is, this bothers me a little bit. I don't want to get into it. Yeah, he could have brought the 2014 thing up. He could have brought a lot up. Yeah. But again, I just think he's being gracious or I don't know, but towards the Biden administration and predecessors. But OK. All right. Well, just I don't want to bring it up.

How about moving forward? It's an encroachment. I don't want to get into it. It's just so long. But the bottom line is that all of you know, we're not going to focus on all of that stuff. We're going to focus on this. Are they going to stop fighting or not? And what it's going to take to stop the fighting and what it's going to take to stop the fighting. If we're being honest and serious here is both sides are going to have to give and both sides should expect to get something from this.

And that's a very difficult thing to do. It's very difficult because Ukraine obviously feels, you know, harmed and rightfully so because they were invaded. And the Russian side, because they feel like they've got momentum in the battlefield and frankly don't care, don't seem to care very much about how many Russian soldiers die in this endeavor. They just churn through it.

And that's what his administration is placing on reaching a peace agreement for a war that's not a war that started under him. It's on the other side of the world. That said, I mean, it's relevant to us, but there are a lot of other issues he could be focused on. So tomorrow we'll be meeting with President Zelensky. We'll be meeting with European leaders. We just met with Putin.

He's dedicated a lot of time and energy because he has made it a priority of his administration to stop wars or prevent them. And right now, this is the biggest war going on in the world. And we're going to continue to do everything we can to reach an agreement that ends the dying and the killing and the suffering that's going on right now. All right. So by the way, I think someone slipped him some gigawatt because he's sparking up a little bit. I should wake up here. This is important.

Important. It's going to be played on the No Agenda show. I got to get some clips for the boys. You know this well, how long these kind of diplomatic negotiations often take. President Trump was telling European leaders what was discussed was Putin demanding control of Donetsk, a region in the east that his forces do not fully hold. And the U.K. estimates that taking that full area could be as long as another four years.

Putin also is demanding Russian be an official language in Ukraine and something regarding Russian Orthodox churches. Did the U.S. Something. No. Something, something about Orthodox. The other guy had it right. Some areas are Russian speaking already.

Yeah. And they want to be Russian and they want to be Russian and they and they want to keep speaking Russian because you have to remember that the Ukrainian government made it the Ukraine language crime and made a crime to speak Russian and made it a crime to speak Russian in the Russian speaking areas. And they don't want all the Ukrainians speaking Russian like she said. They don't want all the Ukrainians speak being part of the Russian Orthodox church like she said. She's full of shit.

But my question from a media analyst standpoint. Why are they like this? Is this only to hate on Trump for midterms for Democrat wins or yes or or wait before you answer. Or is this because they're part of the war machine and just want more more war in the world which is good for over all business is good for her business too. If everything's great. I mean go look at you go look at news dot Google dot com. Tell me there's one happy story is happy stories and there's no happy stories in there.

So but is is that why is it is the global structure reason the second reason is is just a just a bonus. OK. But they hate Trump because of the things he's doing not just because of who he is because of the things he's doing which is counter intuitive to the war of the world. So ultimately it all comes down to they want war they want strife they want people angry at each other. Am I am I missing something.

Well what you're missing I think is that the Democrats in general were always the peaceniks and it had the role reversal took place where they're pro war and they don't really I don't believe that they actually want to be pro war.

They're just kind of in that position because because Trump is such such a peacenik he's like a 60s peacenik and they don't know what they're beside themselves but the whole thing they figure can be resolved by winning the the 20 to 26 midterms and then impeaching him again. They think that's the solution to everything right so that they can go back to being warmongers. It all comes down to war.

I don't think they want I think they'd rather go back to being peaceniks but they they have to rid themselves of this Trump thing. Please the military industrial complex has a hold of them. Maybe controlling them but I don't think that they're. In their hearts. Oh they have good hearts. Well I don't know if they have good hearts or not I'm not I'm not a mind reader but they it's just it's it's they've put themselves in a position where they're it's just awkward.

The Democrats are in a very awkward philosophical position and they don't know what to do about it. That's one of the reasons they're so screwed up. We continue. Language in Ukraine and something regarding Russian Orthodox churches. Did the U.S. accept all of what Putin laid out at that table? I'm not going to tell you honey. The United States is not in a position to accept anything or reject anything because ultimately it's up to the Ukrainians.

They're the ones that Russia has to make peace with. The president said he didn't come to some agreements. It's up to the Ukrainians to make these conditions. Well the agreements were that we were going to try to do things like for example get a leader leaders meeting. We have to make enough progress so that we can sit down President Zelensky and President Putin in the same place which is what President Zelensky has been asking for and reach a final agreement that ends this war.

Now there were some concepts and ideas discussed that we know the Ukrainians can be very supportive of in that meeting. I don't think it's we're not going to negotiate this in the media. I understand that everybody wants to know what happened but ultimately there are things that were discussed as part of this meeting that are potentials for breakthroughs that are potentials for progress.

We'll be discussing that more in depth tomorrow with our European allies with the Ukrainians that are coming over. We'll be discussing all of these things because ultimately we do need to find areas where we're making progress and try to begin to narrow the gap between the two sides. But there's a reason why this war has been going on for three and a half years and that is when it comes to the big issues here there are still some big differences between both sides.

Let's see how much progress we can continue to make. It's not been easy but it's something the president's made a priority. Peace. And he deserves a lot of credit for that. And I think another part of the problem here is that because it's the Trump administration the media is not read in on everything continuously all the time from leakers and Joe just handed a memo here's what was discussed, here's your story, don't worry about doing any work.

The only thing they got truly from the president was this. I believe we had a very productive meeting there were many many points that we agreed on, most of them I would say, a couple of big ones that we haven't quite gotten there but we've made some headway. So there's no deal until there's a deal. I will call up NATO in a little while. I will call up the various people that I think are appropriate and I'll of course call up President Zelensky and tell him about today's meeting.

It's ultimately up to them they're going to have to agree with what Marco and Steve and some of the great people from the Trump administration who have come here. But we had an extremely productive meeting and many points were agreed to and there are just a very few that are left, some are not that significant one is probably the most significant but we have a very good chance of getting there.

Okay, before we come back to Rubio, I just want to go on a little side trip here to our anti-constitutional douchebag Farid Zakaria who of course whenever it's something of international concern we need to bring Farid Zakaria in because he's elite and he knows everything. And he just took it one step further with Tapper. Farid, thanks for joining us.

So President Trump called the meeting extremely productive he definitely tried to put a positive spin on, let's be frank he was trying to bring peace and end a war. I mean there's nothing wrong about his goal. Well, no but that's wrong! We can't have peace! But it does appear there really wasn't anything concrete achieved no ceasefire no sanctions relief or sanctions imposed. We don't really know where we are other than Putin got himself a summit in Alaska. What do you make of what we just saw?

Yeah, I think you have it right, Jake. Look, the atmospherics of the entire summit were somewhat cringeworthy. The fact that Putin was being welcomed on American soil. The fact that Trump gave him literally a red carpet treatment the kind he has rarely given to any, you know, democratic ally of the United States. You can tell that Trump... What? It's unbelievable this guy who gladly walks the red carpet of the White House correspondence dinner. The atmospherics were cringeworthy, I tell you.

Somewhat cringeworthy. The fact that Putin was being welcomed on American soil. The fact that Trump gave him literally a red carpet treatment, the kind he has rarely given to any, you know, democratic ally of the United States. You can tell... Most democratic allies are welcomed by the president. They all get the red carpet treatment. Personally, at the front door of the White House this was pretty remote compared to that. Yeah, up in the middle of nowhere in Alaska at an Air Force base.

With our jets and our bombers flying over. So, it was just so red carpet. I think Putin is you know, is an equal, is this big shot on the world stage and he's been treated by the rest of the West as a kind of pariah. I mean, he can't go to Europe because he'd be arrested. And so, there was a lot of the atmospherics that were cringeworthy. But, I will say, on the most important thing, at least for me, it was positive that there was no deal.

I think everyone was worried that there was going to be a deal in which Trump was going to make major concessions. I don't think anyone thought Putin was going to make any concessions. The fear was that Donald Trump was going to cave in various ways, sell out Ukraine, sell out the Europeans, and he didn't do that. Oh, we dodged the bullet. At least he didn't sell out the Europeans. This Zakaria guy is unbelievable. Now, in this next bit, in this next bit... I didn't get this. I missed this one.

Guys, this literally popped up in the feed, so I'm very grateful for the algo today. Do you remember our prop bets? Because Zakaria runs through a couple of these and I don't really remember our prop bets. Do you remember the ones that we had? I'm sorry? Our prop bets. Oh, the prop bets? Yeah. Do you remember what we had on different prop bets? I think I have the list here. Do you have the list?

Because Zakaria brings up a few of them, and as I was listening to him, like... I can kind of remember them if you bring them up. It's short, so we'll just run through it. You know, I'm at least relieved. Now, when you watch it, what you saw was Putin had clearly decided his strategy was he was going to make no substantive concessions of any kind, but he was going to really amp up the flattery of Trump.

He says if Trump had been president, there would have been no war, which is easy for him to say now. Trump should get the Nobel Prize. He's amazing. He did not say that. He didn't say that. That was one of the prop bets. That was a prop bet, but he didn't say that. Now, he did say... No, he didn't. I don't remember him saying that either. I got the prop bet right here. I watched the whole thing. Putin to endorse Trump for Nobel Prize was 5-2.

Yeah, but it didn't happen, so we would have lost our nuts on that. But he did say, and this was the very end of the, as you call it, hour-long speech. By the way, wait, wait. Hillary Clinton said he should get the Nobel Peace Prize. Correct. She said she would endorse him. Yes. And she looked haggard when she said it. Whoo, boy! Ever since her girl married the Soros kid, Hillary's appearance has gone downhill. Well, it's because of lack of attention. Or adrenochrome, one or the other.

All right. So he says if Trump had been president, there would have been no war, which is easy for him to say now. Trump should get the Nobel Prize. He's amazing. He didn't say he was amazing. I specifically listened to the whole thing. Did not say he was amazing. All that, you know, is cheap and easy rhetoric for Putin, but he laid that on thick. But at the end of the day, he made no concessions.

So Trump comes back empty-handed, but, you know, in a way, better to come back empty-handed than to have given away a quarter of Ukraine. I mean, where does he come up with this? We can't give away Ukraine. We can't give... We don't have these powers. Brennan also did the same thing. Why didn't Trump demand? Why didn't Trump demand? Yeah, because that's... We can't make demands. We're not in this war, except for the fact that we sell machinery. We started it.

Except for the fact that we started it. The fact that we started it, but that's beside the point. It didn't... But this is the thinking of the globalists. The globalists thinks when they're in charge, they do control everything. That's their thinking. That's why they're always saying, Trump is a dictator. What you say, be yourself. Like, we want to be the dictator, not Trump, because that guy, he just tries to make peace bad.

No. Zakaria is exactly in the same circles of people who would think they are in charge of the world like that. So now we go back to Margaret Brennan with Rubio, because we now know that Vladimir, or as Tina called him this morning, Voldemort. She didn't do it purposely, but I kind of liked it. So Voldemort is coming tomorrow, and all of a sudden, all of the EU leaders are coming. Queen, Ursula, Keir Starmer.

Of course, we're going to have Mark Rutte will be there to make sure that we still are buying weapons. We have to be afraid of Russia, because they will be the threat. The threat for at least the next 10 years. So we have to keep them in the threat, because I'm a sales guy, and Margaret Brennan thinks that this is for the following reason. This is the best one. This is good. President Trump told Fox News, his advice to President Zelensky is make a deal.

Russia's a very big power, and they're not. You know there is concern from the Europeans that President Zelensky is going to be bullied into signing something away. That's why you have these European leaders coming as backup tomorrow. Can you reassure them? No, it isn't. That's not true. This is so good.

This is like the fact that she just you know, you know that all the European leaders, Queen and Ursula, they have to come with him because they're afraid that he'll be bullied like the last time he was bullied in the White House, in the Oval Office. I should mention this. This is great. Which is that they have been replaying the media has been, all the media has been replaying that old clip where Trump bullied he didn't really bully him, but he gave him grief in the White House.

It's old, and then they had a lot of meetings ever since this was the original meeting when Trump was irked because Zelensky wouldn't even wear a suit comes in there and he starts acting like an idiot. They were supposed to sign the deal the mineral deal, and he didn't sign it. Right, he didn't sign the deal. Yeah. They keep playing this old they've been playing this old clip all last week. It's entertainment. For what Brian just said. It's entertainment, of course. That was the teaser.

Now we all know because we've played the clips of the bullying it's going to happen again. Can you reassure them? That's not true. That's not true. They're not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelensky from being bullied. That February Oval Office meeting in front of television cameras where President Zelensky was dressed down. I know, and I was just up in Alaska watching the one with Vladimir Putin where red carpet rolls up. No, it was Zelensky. We've had more meetings.

We've had one meeting with Putin and like a dozen meetings with Zelensky. But that's not true. They're not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelensky from being bullied. They're coming here tomorrow because we've been working with the Europeans. We talked to them last week. There were meetings in the UK the previous weekend. And they said President Trump was going to demand a ceasefire. As early as Thursday. But you said that they're coming here tomorrow to keep Zelensky from being bullied.

They're not coming here tomorrow. This is such a stupid media narrative. That they're coming here tomorrow because Trump is going to bully Zelensky into a bad deal. We've been working with these people for weeks. For weeks on this stuff. They're coming here tomorrow because they chose to come here tomorrow. We invited them to come. We invited them to come. The President invited them to come. And we'll go to Queen Ursula in a moment who spoke this morning. But one last clip here from Marco.

Marco, finally the gigawatt kicked in. But the President told those European leaders last week that he wanted a ceasefire. The President went on television and said he would walk out of the meeting if Vladimir Putin didn't agree. He didn't walk out of the meeting! He said there would be severe consequences if he didn't agree to one. He said he'd walk out in two minutes. He spent three hours talking to Vladimir Putin and he did not get one.

He was getting his instructions from Vladimir Putin, of course. So there's some mixed messages. Things happened during that meeting. Our goal here is not to stage some production for the world to say, oh, how dramatic. He walked out. Our goal here is to have a peace agreement. To end this war. And obviously we felt, and I agreed, that there was enough progress. Not a lot of progress, but enough progress made in those talks to allow us to move to the next phase.

If not, we wouldn't be having Zelensky flying all the way over here. We wouldn't be having all the Europeans coming all the way over here. Now understand, and take with a grain of salt, I'm not saying we're on the verge of a peace deal, but I am saying that we saw movement. Enough movement to justify a follow-up meeting with Zelensky and the Europeans. Enough movement for us to dedicate even more time to this. You talk about the sanctions.

Look, at the end of the day, if peace is not going to be possible here, and this is just going to continue on as a war, people will continue to die by the thousands. The President has that option to then come in and impose new sanctions. But if he did this now, the moment the President puts those additional sanctions, that's the end of the talks. You've basically locked in at least another year to year and a half of war and death and destruction.

We may unfortunately wind up there, but we don't want to wind up there. We want to wind up with a peace deal that ends this war so Ukraine can go on with the rest of their lives and rebuild their country and be assured that this is never going to happen again. That's the goal here. We're going to do everything possible to make that happen if it's doable. It will require both sides to make concessions. It will require both sides to get things they're asking for.

That's how these deals are made, whether we like it or not. I got two more from Witkoff, because Witkoff has been the main negotiator. He's met with Putin several times. All these people, like Rubio and Witkoff, they do these interviews like they have a gun to their head. They're like, OK, well listen, I'll do Brennan, and you've got to do Tapper. Oh man, why do I have to do Tapper? He's such a douchebag.

Who was in the room for the Trump -Putin summit, and it was a three-on -three, and he was one of the three. He has also met face-to-face with Vladimir Putin many times, including earlier this month in Moscow. Ambassador Witkoff, always good to have you on. Thank you so much. President Trump called this an extremely productive meeting and said many points were agreed to. You were in the room. Can you give us two specific points that were agreed to? Why does he only ask for two? But what is this?

Did they pre-agree? Listen, producer, I'm going to give Tapper two, OK? That's all I'm giving him. I mean, that's a very odd way to stage the question. That is very strange. He could have said, can you tell us some or any? A couple? A couple would have been better. Anything, but specifically two were agreed to. You were in the room. Can you give us two specific points that were agreed to? We agreed, Jake. First of all, thank you for having me, and good morning.

We agreed to robust security guarantees that I would describe as game-changing. We didn't think that we were anywhere close to agreeing to Article 5 protection from the United States, legislative enshrinement within the Russian Federation, not to go after any other territory when the peace deal is codified, legislative enshrinement in the Russian Federation, not to go after any other European countries and violate their sovereignty. We agreed, and there was plenty more.

So Tapper goes, no, that was... So it's like a shocker. That was the most informative one minute of audio tape I got. He said, there will be Article 5-like protections. Just to remind everybody, NATO Article 5, if you strike one... If you strike one of us, you strike all of us, we all band together as NATO, and we come and... You get bombed. You get bombed, exactly. So, Article 5-like protection is a huge concession. I'm not sure what it means yet. And we're not even sure... Well, but...

Whitcoff knows what it means. Well, bear with me. Because I think we can find out what that is. Article 5-like. That doesn't necessarily mean NATO, but Article 5 -like. And the second thing he says is it will be enshrined into their legislation, which I guess means, legally, they'll agree to it that Ukraine won't take any territory after this deal is done, and Russia won't take any territory. That, to me, sounds like there's a real deal in the making. And all Tapper does is, huh. I know.

Can you elaborate more? He could have said... That's fascinating. What do you think he said? Because I have the exact follow-up. What did he say after that statement, which was the most informative of all of the talks coming straight from the guy who was there, who speaks English without the weave. I'm like, oh, that is... I can guess exactly what he said. He said, huh, which is the opening. Huh. Can you... Is there... Was that assured?

Does that look like that's the kind of the deal that's going to go through? Do you think that'll be part of the final determination? Something along those lines? That sounds like a very positive thing. Do you think that's going to happen? That's what he said. Obviously, my partner is being very facetious here on the show. That's what I would do. He knows that it's a little show. It's CNN. It's Jake Tapper. No, that's not what he did. We go from the disdain, huh, into his next bit.

Here's what President Trump said going into the meeting about the need for a ceasefire. Let's roll that tape. I want to see a ceasefire rapidly. I don't know if it's going to be today, but I'm not going to be happy if it's not today. Everyone said it can't be today, but I'm just saying I want the killing to stop. I'm in this to stop the killing. Obviously, the ceasefire didn't happen.

Last night, Russia launched more than 60 aerial attacks across Ukraine, killing at least five people, injuring 11. President Trump had said if he didn't like what he was hearing in the meeting, he would walk out. Why didn't he, once it became clear Putin was not going to agree to a ceasefire, which would end the bloodshed now. This is the meeting they had. All right, everybody, we're going to go after the fact that Trump, Trump, the orange man, that he said he would walk out.

Margaret, you got that? Yeah, I got that. Martha, you got it? Yeah, I got that. They all did it. You said he would walk out in two minutes. He didn't walk out. What's wrong with him? What does Vladimir have on him? Do they have kompromat? That's the meeting they had. Yes, you're exactly right. They all asked the same question. They all did the exact same thing in this regard. Jake, the one thing, we were there as a mediator, so we were obviously advancing the Ukrainian view.

The one thing that the president cannot agree to on behalf of the Ukrainians is any sort of land swap. That is for the Ukrainians. They've asked us, or stated that to us, and the president is respectful of it, but that's why we're moving so quickly to a meeting on Monday at the Oval Office with President Zelensky. That being said, we covered almost all the other issues necessary for a peace deal. I described the ceasefire as the interim move where you would then negotiate towards a peace deal.

We made so much progress at this meeting with regard to all the other ingredients necessary for a peace deal that President Trump pivoted to that place. We're not waiting a week for a meeting with President Zelensky and the European leaders, or two weeks, or three weeks. We're going into a meeting with them within 48 hours of ending this meeting in Alaska. We are intent on trying to hammer out a peace deal that ends the fighting permanently very, very quickly. Quicker than a ceasefire.

Okay, so now we go to Europe. This morning Queen Ursula and Prince Zelensky had their little talk in Brussels in the EU Commission press room. Zelensky, he had puppy dog eyes the whole time towards Queen Ursula while she's talking. Puppy dog eyes. She's clearly on a riser. She's got a standing on an apple crate. She's just like this is my moment. This is my moment. I am the queen. I'm Queen Ursula.

And she's going to lay it out, and I think we find out what the Article 5-like security is going to be. I'm very glad that I'm able to accompany you and other European leaders for the meeting tomorrow. So you don't get bullied. That we do have with the U.S. President in the White House since the beginning of Russia's brutal invasion. Brutal invasion. What happened to full scale, lady? Stick to the script. Brutal invasion.

Europe has been at Ukraine's side united, and we will support you for as long as it takes for just and lasting peace. And this peace must be achieved through strength. Let me touch upon the main points. First, we must have strong security guarantees to protect both Ukraine and Europe's vital security interests. Ukraine must be able to uphold its sovereignty and its territorial integrity. There can be no limitations on Ukrainian armed forces, be it cooperation with...

She, by the way, is the negotiator in this. You're hearing the actual Ukrainian talking point, so they have to be able to have their own army, which I'm sure Putin's fine with, and Europe wants that too. They want to arm those boys up to the hilt, but not with the traditional things. There can be no limitations on Ukrainian armed forces, be it cooperation with or other third countries or assistance from other third countries. No limitations for the Ukrainian armed forces.

As I've often said, Ukraine must become a steel porcupine. Undigestible for potential invaders. We're back to the steel porcupine bit. This is great. Ukraine has to be a steel porcupine with all of our stuff that we are going to buy from America and give to you. We welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5 life security guarantees for Ukraine and the coalition of the willing, including the European Union, is ready to do its share.

We know that the work of defending Europe is first and foremost our responsibility, and we've been working hard to speed up and scale up as we increase Europe's defense capability. Through the safe instrument, we are ensuring that the defense needs of member states and Ukraine can be matched and that Ukraine's industrial defense base is strengthened. I am thinking in particular of drones here.

This is in our mutual interest, and I intend to travel to the frontline member states in the coming weeks. At the same time, we continue to support Ukraine's path to its membership in the European Union. This in itself is also a security guarantee. There you go. So Article 5 like security guarantees means that they have a path into the EU, and it would be the EU would be the NATO-like organization in this case for the Article 5 like security guarantees.

It's going to be the EU, and since they don't have any planes or bombers or tanks, they're going to build drones. They're going to start a drone industry in Ukraine. That's been brewing for a long time. No, we've already had the clips on it. They already have it. They have a high-end, they have smart aeronautical engineering. That's where Antonov is. And Antonov is one of the great plane makers of the world. That's also Eric Schmidt. Eric Schmidt has his whole drone outfit.

And then you have the Eric Schmidt operation going on. Yeah, the drone thing is going to be what they're going to do. Now the thing I want to mention about the ceasefire that Trump bailed on, it was made obvious to him and it's obvious to everybody that the ceasefire was a phony baloney deal if it was going to happen in the first place. Mearsheimer talked about this too.

The ceasefire would have just meant a stoppage to allow Ukraine to build up forces and even bring in some European troops that were threatened by, I think, the UK wanting to send some people over and some others so they would just make the war worse. Yeah, exactly. Alright, so now they throw out, this is really the term I'm looking for. Because, of course, we have to have an out or we have to be able to blame somebody else if this doesn't happen. And that's the actor.

So let the actor take the fall. If we don't like what we see, if we don't like what we hear, we're going to push it on the prince. My second point, with regards to any territorial questions in Ukraine, our position is clear. International borders cannot be changed by force. These are decisions to be made by Ukraine and Ukraine alone. And these decisions cannot be taken without Ukraine at the table. We have to have our prince at the table!

My third and final point, as long as the bloodshed in Ukraine continues, Europe will maintain diplomatic and, in particular, economic pressure on Russia. We will continue to strengthen sanctions. We have adopted 18 packages so far and we are advancing preparation for the 19th. The 19th sanctions package. At what point do you figure out that it's not going to do any good? Your sanctions are useless. So then Volodymyr speaks. I only got a minute and a half of him.

Actually, in some ways, the sanctions are hurting Europe more than they're hurting Russia. They absolutely are! Not to mention the fact that the Russian oligarchs had loved to go to Saint-Tropez and drop tens of thousands of dollars on Dom Pérignon for the house. Yeah, with those Roman candles and all the babes. We've seen it. We know it. Yes. It's cool. Thank you so much, dear Ursula. Ursula, dear Ursula! Thank you for your support. Thank you for this day.

It's very important for all your support from the very beginning of this war. And it's very important that you are with us and that we speak to America and we speak together. And it's important that Washington is... Interesting the way he frames that. It's almost like we're the enemy here in this. It's very important that we speak to America together as a unified front because we can't trust that. That was an interesting catch. You are with us and that we speak to America and we speak together.

And it's important that Washington is with us. And today in several months we are deciding what we are going to discuss in Washington. Dear journalists, it's crucial that Europe is... How many leaders do you know that say, dear journalists, listen up, this is what I want you to write. This is important. We gave you the briefing. Dear journalists, this is important. What we are going to discuss in Washington.

Dear journalists, it's crucial that Europe is as united now as it was at the very beginning as it was in 2022 when the full-scale war began. This unity really helps to reach real peace and it must stay strong. First, we have to stop the killings. Putin has many demands, but we do not know all of them. And if there are really as many as we heard, then it will take time to go through them all. It's impossible to do this under the pressure of weapons.

So it's necessary to cease fire and war quickly on a final deal. So already he's backpedaling on this by saying, nah, we've got to cease fire before we have a final deal. He's sabotaging it and it's obvious that Ursula has her hand up his butt, pulling the strings. We'll talk about it in Washington. Putin does not want to stop the killing, but he must do it. Second, we need real negotiations, which means they can start where the front line is now.

The contact line is the best line for talking and Europeans support this. And we thank everyone. Russia is still unsuccessful in Donetsk region. Putin has been unable to take it for 12 years. And the constitution of Ukraine makes it impossible to give up territory or trade land. Since the territorial issue is so important, it should be discussed only by the leaders of Ukraine and Russia and the trilateral Ukraine, United States, Russia. So far, Russia gives no sign that trilateral will happen.

And if Russia refuses, then new sanctions must follow. So what he's saying is we want to be on equal footing with the United States at the table. We don't like it that you're doing the deal for us. And the only way out of this, which I think is the correct way for... And by the way, what deal are we doing for them? We're just trying to facilitate as far as I understand. I don't see that we're doing anything in that regard. We are trying to facilitate, but I mean, we're not doing any deals.

Well, I think the deal that's on the table is we give some kind of guarantee that during the accession period of Ukraine into the EU, they get Article V-like guarantees from the EU, not from NATO, but from the EU. And so that way, while that's taking... And that'll take several years because they have to get rid of... In fact, it may never happen. And Europe probably doesn't want it to happen.

But in the meantime, we can continue all of our corruption scams, all of our money laundering through the drone industry and whatever else we're going to be setting up there. And the new Ukraine, we've already started the rebuilding Ukraine process. And we'll have this reason to buy military equipment and to start manufacturing our own, but apparently it's not going to be tanks or planes or guns. It's going to be drones. Because that's what they needed. They need that continuous threat.

And I'm still not sure that we won't wind up with a demilitarized zone and an armistice at the end of the day. In the newsletter, you actually wrote some interesting things about how similar the US and Russia are, which I thought was quite correct. And I'm not going to play any clips from it, but President Putin actually his entire, and it was long, his eight minutes of thank you for letting me be here was very truthful and complimentary.

He talked about how the Russians and the US worked together during World War II and the bridge, the air bridge that we spearheaded into Europe went from Alaska. He went to visit the burial site of the Russian pilots who were buried in Alaska. He talked about how we should be doing more business together. He liked how President Trump was a businessman. And then at the very end, he said, Mr. President is right.

If it was him who was a president at the time, the war wouldn't have started because I kept warning the Biden administration not to do what they were doing. And that's the truth. We were here. But that, of course, only turns into, oh, it's just an atmospherics that was cringeworthy. Until the very end, and this I think, I think this was the true giveaway that this was not the real Putin because I've heard Putin speak English, and this was not the real Putin.

The way his face moved, the way he looked, but it was still a funny ending. Again, Mr. President. By the way, it's possible that they did have a meeting, Putin and Trump, and Putin was on the, you know, they had three hours on a big screen in the room with the fake Putin and the real Putin on the screen, and they could have been negotiating basically face to face. Maybe they had the fake Trump there too. Maybe it was just two actors. It could have been the fake Trump. Yeah, easily.

It was hard to tell on the big screen. Anyway, here's the wind up and the goodbye. Again, Mr. President, I'd like to thank you very much, and we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon. Thank you very much, Vladimir. Next time in Moscow. Oh, that's an interesting one. I don't know, I'll get a little heat on that one, but I could see it possibly happening. Thank you very much, Vladimir, and thank you all. Thank you. There's a prop bet for you. Next time, Moscow?

By the way, that fact that he didn't do the normal yak yak yak press conference at the end might be an indication that it wasn't Trump. No weave. It was on script. Never smiled. No, no, no. I do have, if you're interested, I have a couple of shorties from our Canadian guy, Andrew Resulis. I like him. I like him a lot. I like how our Canadian producers are always finding him because he doesn't just go on CBC, he goes on CTV, he's all over the place.

So they find his clips for me, and this was kind of an interesting answer that he gives. Joining us now is Andrew Resulis, retired official from the Department of National Defense. Andrew, thank you as always for joining us. Trump's saying that the meeting with Putin was a success. Is there a truth to that? Well, it was an event, and it moved the goalposts. It was an event. Yeah, there you go, it was an event.

It's success from a Russian point of view, and not very successful from a Ukrainian point of view. The reason is, is that the effect of the meeting, and that's what they'll discuss with Zelensky in Washington on Monday, is that the Ukrainian idea of first having a ceasefire, then followed by negotiations on a peace settlement have basically been taken off the table. The Americans are now agreeing with the Russian position, which is negotiations on a peace settlement must precede ceasefire.

So fighting continues while you negotiate a framework for a peace settlement. So the Ukrainians now are left in a difficult position. They can either move to actually a framework discussion of a peace settlement, or they can simply keep fighting and not talk to the Russians. And in this clip, he brings up an interesting concept, which I'm not even sure I understand how it works, but this is about the war continuing or not. Can they afford to keep fighting?

We hear repeatedly now that they're losing more and more ground. Are they going to actually, are they going to hit a point where they may have to sue for peace? They may. It's hard to judge right now, but I guess most analysts suggest that the war could grind on for about another, well, certainly for the rest of 2025 and into 2026.

And the big calculus there is on the Russian side, they feel that by sometime in 2026, they can exhaust the Ukrainians, where the Ukrainians essentially capitulate to the Russian demands for a settlement.

On the other hand, the Ukrainians think that maybe if they can keep fighting, even though they're withdrawing, they are withdrawing, they can wear down the Russians and wait for the Russian economy to, as they think, collapse and not be able to fund the Russian war, and then the Russians will have to sue for peace. So that's the calculus on both sides. Did he say sue for peace? Sue for peace. Sue for peace? What does that mean? Sue for peace. It's a court? Well, it's a phrase.

It's a sue for peace. It means you make, you say, we're going to the negotiating table. We're going to do the deal right now. Oh, I thought he actually had been going to the, like, international criminal court. No, no, no. Sue for peace is just a phrase. Oh, okay. And then... It's, you know, like, just a phrase. It doesn't mean actually suing. Thank you for that. People have to get a clue about, and you can get a clue by watching YouTube videos. The Russian economy is not about their collapse.

In fact, the GDP went up when all the sanctions... They have a war economy. One, they have a war economy. Second, they're doing just, they're not making the kinds of money they would be making if they had open market oil. They'd be making more. But they're making money because they have a lot of it, and they're selling it to India and China who are smart enough to buy it because it's cheaper than the open market stuff, but it's still helping them. And the Russian economy adjusted a lot.

You know, when they first started the sanctioning, this was, I think we reported this years ago, the Russians were, they lost a lot of the trade with, especially with Poland, of different fruits and vegetables, and the Russians picked up the slack, and especially with dairy, and they went internal and they started developing their own businesses.

They actually flourished because instead of relying on imports for everything at the grocery store, they started making it themselves, and it turns out that they had all these capabilities in abeyance, and they're doing quite well.

Why we are, this promotion of the idea that the Russian economy's in bad shape, is if you go find some Russian YouTube, or you find YouTube videos of people walking around on the street in Russia, and going in and out of stores, and there's people in grocery stores, there's reports, there's all kinds of stuff. Some of the grocery stores in Moscow are better than the ones we've had here.

And I remember going to Moscow before the fall of communism, about the time you were there, and you'd go to the world's first department store, it's not in France, it was the GUM. The GUM store in Moscow, which was a big, giant department store. That was the world's first department store? As far as I know. How about that? And it was empty.

There was like, we went around, looked at different things, I was taken around by a typical cynic that's crawling with them, and only one section of the store had, they had like a million raincoats for sale. And the guy says, they're probably all the same size, the size nobody wears, it's the only reason they're there.

And you would go to the Russian stores, and they were all a mess, they were no good, they didn't have anything, but then they had these other stores, these black markets, they weren't black market, they were official, but you had to have a passport to get into them, and they were English. They took only dollars. And you go in there, they had everything. They straightened that out. And it's not like all U.S. companies have stopped doing business there. We have enough evidence of that.

So we're being misled about a lot of this stuff. All of it? Let me just play this last bit, it's about Trump, 30 seconds. And the wild card in this, of course, is Donald Trump. What more can he do to try and bring about an end to this war? He's very much the broker here. So he's doing the broker role, which he's met with Putin. He's gotten where he can with Putin, and we can see that he's not gotten very far. The Russians are holding very firm.

Now, he's going to go on Monday when Zelensky comes to Washington to actually see if he can move the Ukrainians to that framework discussion of a peace settlement. If he can do that, he will have moved the goalposts closer to a peace settlement. Not everyone will like the terms of that, but he has moved at least closer to peace. Now, do you think they will do an Oval Office sit-down with Zelensky, Queen Ursula, Keir Starmer, Macron? It's too many people.

Well, he's had more people in there before. I mean, I would love to see him and Ursula, and it would be great if he just slapped her around. That would be funny. Well, he sat down with her recently, and he was very complimentary. He was complimentary, because he knew we had some kind of deal. Still not quite sure if that's an actual deal that she can offer. He plays her like... Everyone says Putin manipulates Trump, but he does the same thing with her.

But, I mean, are we going to get a show tomorrow? Will it be behind closed doors? Will they do it in the big desk room? Well, I have no idea. Think like Trump. He clearly will want to do a show. He'd put a presentation on someplace in a bigger room. I don't like the Cabinet Room. That's too formal. There's no good angles. It doesn't look right. No, the Cabinet Room's no good. I don't know where they'd do it. I think he's comfortable in there, because it reminds him of the set of The Apprentice.

He could fire Ursula. Well, it'll be interesting to watch. I only have a couple more clips on this topic. We can put them off. Everything's going to change tomorrow. Yeah, these are the PBS clips, and they brought in some spook to talk about this. Who's on the payroll, no doubt. Oh, I'm sorry. This is not the clip. Andrea Kendall something or other. There's a WTF clip in here, so I wanted to play these. This is Trump, Putin, this is CBS, but I think it's PBS.

This is some intelligence asset discussing the Putin peace discussions in Alaska. Peace efforts in the war between Russia and Ukraine shift to the White House next week, when President Trump meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Their talks come as Mr. Trump has now aligned himself with Russian President Vladimir Putin, dropping his demand for a ceasefire and backing a comprehensive agreement to end the war instead.

Hours after meeting with Putin in Alaska, Mr. Trump announced a sudden reversal on Truth Social. It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a peace agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere ceasefire agreement. Earlier, the President had told Fox News' Sean Hannity that the responsibility is now on others. Now it's really up to President Zelensky to get it done.

And I would also say the European nations, they have to get involved a little bit. And now for analysis of all of this, Andrea Kendall Taylor, she's a former senior intelligence officer. She's now a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security. Andrea, in addition to sort of flip-flopping, you're changing his position on the ceasefire, there are now reports that he's told European leaders that he now supports Russia's demand for territory for peace.

Where does this leave the peace effort? Wow, she's a real spook. She looks a bit like a... She looks like a honeypot type spook. Well, she's got a long head, kind of like Ann Coulter. Yeah, a little bit. Yeah, senior fellow. She's spooky looking. I emphasize the fact that he's calling him Mr. Trump. Yeah, I heard that. Yes. Twice. Which I thought was some sort of offensive thing. PBS has really gone down the tubes. Your regular complaint.

I don't understand why people finance them or give them money. Which is another of my complaints. Especially after we got no donations this last show, for the last show. It's the worst in three years. Yes, well, pre-COVID. Yeah, but it's soured me. So I say more than three years. I think it's about closer to five. It has soured me. Well, it should. We'll talk about that later. You're sour anyway. I'm not sour. I'm a very positive guy. Now we have...

This clip I labeled, this is the second clip of the group. And I put a WTF in here because there's something said in here that is... What? Where does this leave the peace effort? Well, I think this was the big concern going into the Alaska meeting that President Trump would in fact come around to Putin's point of view and join on to his demands. And then force that deal on Ukraine and the Europeans.

And then if they reject a deal that's unjust and unfair to Ukraine, we'll turn around and reassign blame to Ukraine. What? Ukraine will reassign blame to Ukraine? Yeah, that's what I mean. I don't understand what she said there. Well, she talks a bit like that, so I don't know. I don't know. Yeah, she seems like for an intelligence asset she seems like a dingbat. Maybe that's what the intelligence assets are these days. That's a possibility. Mm-hmm.

Onward. You know, I think we're perhaps even in a worse position than we were going in because I'm exceptionally concerned that now, after months of suggesting he would ramp up pressure on Russia, that Trump is once again reversing course and is going to apply that pressure now on Ukraine.

After he spoke with President Trump early this morning, President Zelensky had a social media post that doesn't directly contradict the president, but he does say the fire must cease on both the battlefield and in the sky. What does this do for this meeting on Monday? What are the stakes for this meeting on Monday now? Well, the stakes are really significant, and as that quote from President Zelensky underscores, the Russian and the Ukrainian sides are as far apart as they've ever been.

And so now Zelensky really is in a perilous and precarious position. He has to walk a tight rope, essentially. I think my hope is that he might take a page from the Russian negotiating playbook and come back to President Trump with a yes but to try to demonstrate, yes, that he too is interested in peace but then lay out his conditions that would have to be met.

That might help Zelensky buy a little bit more time for things to calm down and also to buy time for the Europeans, who I do think really need to prepare to step in to fill a gap if President Trump decides to withdraw support for Ukraine. Wow, they pay this woman to come up with this great analysis? Isn't that terrible? I think that they may take a page from the Russian playbook and come back with their own demands. It's called negotiation.

And then I think maybe the Europeans will have to step — come on, lady. Is that what they teach at Yale? She's a Yalie. You notice that, yeah, she's a professor. Can you imagine? She was a senior analyst at CIA where she worked on Russia and Eurasia, the political dynamics of autocracies and democratic decline. That sounds like gender studies of Spooksville to me. It does to me, too. It's not impressive.

And meanwhile, she gets booked on the PBS News Saturday News Hour, which is one of the premium shows. So she's got a booker or she's got somebody, she's got an agent or who knows what. Somebody told them to book her and I'm listening to her and she says, looks like and sounds like a dingbat. But yes, this is what we get for PBS. It's financed by the public. Not anymore. We don't finance them anymore. Oh, yeah, you're right. The 1%.

Which means that they're spending hundreds of millions of dollars on this drivel. Where Rassoulis just shows up anywhere for free. You can get the Canuck. Just call him. He's in his office. When was he on PBS the last time? Never. He's got the wrong message. He has a message of truth. We're finished off with this woman. Going into this summit, President Trump really raised the expectations for a ceasefire. Talked about how it's really what he wanted to come out of the meeting with.

And then the day after, he says the ceasefire is out the window. What do you think happened in that meeting? Well, I think first, President Trump sat down with Putin and was able to hear from him Putin's version of the war. His version of what's happening on the battlefield. And he's sympathetic to Putin. He obviously has an inclination to want to agree with Putin and maintain that close personal relationship.

President Trump continues to have this vision of Russia as a great power, perhaps dating back to the 80s with the USSR and, of course, Sergey Lavrov with the throwback with the Soviet Union sweatshirt, reminding Trump that Russia is, in fact, a great power. So I suspect he went into that meeting with Putin and recognized yet again that Putin is not willing to back down on his demands. And so he now, I think, views Zelensky as the weaker party.

And I think one final point that is also worth highlighting is President Trump does not have a solid grasp of the facts and the issues at hand. President Putin, in contrast, knows these details in and out. He's a steely-eyed, detail-oriented dictator. If they're in a discussion, in a negotiation, it's not a level playing field. I don't see how Trump can do a good deal when he doesn't have a solid grasp of the facts.

Andrea Kendall-Taylor of the Center for a New American Security, thank you very much. He doesn't have a solid grasp of the facts. Please. Well, let's stick with PBS because I've been intrigued. People need to know that we never speak in between shows. We don't discuss what we're going to talk about. We hope that if I don't have it, that the other guy has it. So I don't listen to your clips when they come in.

You have a series of PBS clips called AI Models, and I'm hoping this is about model collapse. Wrong. Oh, crap. Don't tell me it's about fashion models. Yeah. Well, let's do it. Especially since we got a nice note this morning. Very nice note from David Bush. And I will try to do his voice. Your dislike of AI has become smug and tiresome. Wow. It's like you know the guy. Well, I know a lot of guys like him. They email me all the time.

That's exactly what his note said, and I took offense because I don't have that feeling, and I sent him a nasty note back. And also, it's like I don't have a dislike of AI. I use AI. I'm a vibe coder. I'm saying it's marginally useful, and it's killed art for the show, and it's just because I refuse to play AI end-of-show mixes.

We're basically running out of end-of-show mixes, which I think, tangentially, is because AI end-of-show mixes are going, wow, you know, I've worked on this for five hours, but I know that if I just threw some prompts in, it would be better. You know, it's killing a lot of things, and the only it's not a dislike. I think it's phony. It's fake.

It's a parlor trick, and I think it's dangerous because we have 350 companies making chatbots that people are now getting involved with, having sex with, marrying, taking psychiatric advice from, training their children. So that's not a dislike. It's an honest opinion. But opinions are not something that people want anymore from their podcasters. They want you to agree with them. That's what they want. They want you to agree with them. No, they want opinions that agree with them.

Yes, that's what they want. And if not, then it typically goes like, I can't in good conscience donate anymore to you. That's the British version. So give me your PBS AI models. Yeah, this is just a big, kind of a semi-bullcrap scandal that was started by a couple of women who set up a modeling agency that creates AI models. Oh, this was from the story a while back. This just happened. Well, we had a couple clips not too long ago from this. This is from Vogue magazine.

Yes. We had a story, but not PBS clips. I mean, this is elevated into PBS land, where you can get a tote bag if you donate. You can get a tote bag. And a CD. You can drop a hundred bucks and get a ten-buck CD. Actually, it's a DVD of Andrea Bocelli, which is, I've got to say, it's pretty dynamite. So let's listen to what they have to say. The rise of artificial intelligence has touched virtually every industry, disrupting long-established workflows and raising concerns about job losses.

Now, the fashion world is reckoning with these changes as AI takes hold there, from customer service chatbots to virtual fitting rooms and AI avatars starring in marketing campaigns. Ali Rogan explores this refashioning of the industry and why it's raising alarms. This August's Vogue magazine may give us a glimpse into the future of fashion. This ad features a new model styled in outfits from the clothing brand Guess.

She gazes into the camera with a wide smile and bright eyes, and none of it is real. She was generated by AI. Right now we're at a point where we can create the same level of quality, of beauty, of compositions with AI and you don't have to deal with a lot of logistics. So why not utilize logistics? Like annoying models who don't show up on time, take forever at the makeup table. With AI. And you don't have to deal with a lot of logistics. So why not utilize it?

Valentina Gonzalez and Andrea Petrescu are the co -founders of Serafine Valora, the AI modeling agency behind the ad that's garnered so much attention. We believe that AI is the future of fashion in the sense of supplementing and offering a new avenue of marketing. Some have called for a boycott of Vogue for giving it a platform. But this ad wasn't the first to use AI models.

In March, fashion brand H&M experimented with a new marketing strategy by digitally cloning actual models with their consent. This appeared to be almost more of a campaign for using AI-generated models than a clothing campaign. You know what I don't understand? Why has Scaramanga not already taken off like a rocket in this business? He knows how to do this. Why is no one hiring him? He's going to have to partner with somebody, maybe my son.

Mimi was watching television a couple of days ago and she says, you got to get back in here. Look at this. This is AI. The irony, of course, is that I can't tell you who this advertisement was for, some software company. The old joke is, what a great ad. Who is it for? I don't know. Yes, exactly. Every Super Bowl ad. The problem with advertising is like, do you remember the brand? No?

Okay. But it was in fact, I had to look at, and people will see this ad, it's floating around, and it's a bunch of different people. One of them, distinctly, you've seen before in some Door Brothers AI productions. They're all holding a banana and talking about a banana blowing up or some damn thing. They're walking down the street and there's four scenes, all phony, and they seem to have nothing to do with anything.

They look very realistic, and if you weren't thinking about it, Mimi, I guess, recognized one of the characters and figured it was AI. I look back on it. Yeah, it probably was. I think about, well, if you could do an ad using AI, you don't have to pay residuals. Yeah. It's a one and done. You don't have to, it might be easier if you can work and make the ad work.

I think if you're one of those detail -oriented people that have to do it this way and that way, let's shoot it again, let's shoot it again, let's shoot it again. If you're one of those guys, yeah, you're never going to get a good ad that way.

But if you're pretty loose, although I have to say, since I don't remember the brand this was advertising, it was a fail, but I think the potential is there, and I think that's what they're arguing in this piece about the girl that was the fake AI in the guest ad is very pretty. Looks real. I mean, it's just a composite of different people. Yeah. Okay. Anyway, part two. Sarah Ziff is a former model who founded the Model Alliance, an advocacy group for workers in the industry.

She recalls how just two years ago, the brand Levi's was under fire for planning to promote diversity by using AI models. It's important that companies actually celebrate diverse people, not just sort of showcase an avatar who is diverse. For many brands, AI models are viewed as a cost-saving alternative to elaborate photo shoots. Oh, I see the problem. The problem here is you're using AI black people. That's when it becomes a problem. Yes, exactly. That's the problem.

Industry insiders warn that would take away many traditional jobs, while proponents of AI argue that they're just creating different jobs. We open a new opportunity for a completely different type of creatives to expose their work to the biggest fashion magazines, and that's a conversation we should be having. To continue that conversation, I'm joined by Sinead Bovell, a former model turned tech entrepreneur who studies AI's impact on society.

She's also the founder of Way, a tech education company. Sinead, thank you so much for being here. You predicted this moment that we are now in. Back in 2020, you wrote an op-ed about it, ironically in Vogue. Is this a moment, a turning point in the use of AI within the fashion industry? Why I think it is a turning point is because I, and I think many people, kind of look to Vogue in some ways as like the Supreme Court of Fashion.

So by AI appearing in one of their magazines, one of the most sought after exclusive magazines, it's almost like it's the industry's stamp of approval on the supplier side in a way that AI is here to stay and acceptable at the highest ranking order of fashion. The thing that is just hilarious, and of course these are only people who are, you know, the only people who can be mad are people whose jobs will be displaced and it's unavoidable with generative AI.

But the joke of it is, and you and I have both been around long enough, boomer moment, I've been around models, I've been around super models. Cindy Crawford, when she was a super model, she was on MTV. What you see in the magazines is fake. It's not what Cindy Crawford looks like. She obviously has beautiful features. Yes, the features. You get a makeup artist. Airbrush, remember airbrushing? That's what it was called. Airbrushing before Photoshop. Actually, that is brought up in these clips.

Oh! And this guest ad has elicited strong opinions, a lot of controversy, particularly when it comes to beauty standards and what it means for reshaping the standards that people look to. The co-founders behind this ad touched on this point. Here's what they said. I would argue that it's actually more freeing for a woman to know that these images are made with AI and that they don't exist and that they're just a digital, created through a digital medium. Oh, this is great.

No, the women viewing the ads will feel more free. They'll feel freer, like, oh, no woman like that exists. And so the woman in the pictures actually didn't perhaps start for herself. Or I believe it's maybe more freeing because you actually don't compare with something that doesn't exist. Hmm. So that's a really interesting perspective. I agree that looking at an AI-generated figure, we might start to say, well, because this isn't real, I don't even see the value in comparing myself to it.

But the problem is, in some ways, AI has crossed over that uncanny valley where we can understand that it's not real. So the only way that perspective is going to work is if it's clearly identified that the figure you're looking at is AI-generated. This is great. Remind me. Well, it's almost done. I'll finish the clip. I've got to say something. Without that labeling, which there is no industry rule that that has to happen, we really have no idea. And that's still a pretty broad assumption.

Because they're so perfect and because they're AI, people won't compare themselves to it. I think we would have to leave that question to the Department of Psychology. Oh, brother. There's been an ongoing discussion in the podcast Industrial Complex about the need for a special tag to put into your RSS feed that discloses that AI voices are used in this podcast. Why? I don't know. It's the silliest thing. Probably the same reason. Well, hey, man, before you know it, some AI's going to take over.

No, it's not. Also, we don't want people to be duped by fake AI voices. What difference does it make? Absolutely. By fake real voices. The guys are just fake people. People that are phonies. I'm not phony. I really have balls this size. There's the final clip, which I think addresses one of these issues. It's misrepresentation. So you could create an identity of, say, an AI-generated black woman that misrepresents that community. So there are all of these kind of strange areas.

This is the most racist thing I've heard today. An AI black woman that represents that community. How do you hear yourself? That misrepresents that community. So there are all of these kind of strange areas, and I call it digital cultural appropriation. There it is. Cultural appropriation is, of course, not illegal. But we, as a society, decided this probably isn't a good thing. Let's draw a line here.

And it doesn't mean all characters, AI characters, have to represent the exact people in the companies. No, that's kind of ridiculous. But we do have to figure out what are the new lines of representation in an era when you can generate identities using artificial intelligence. Well, such interesting questions. Sinead Bovell, thank you so much. Such interesting questions. AI black faith.

It's an outrage that a bunch of Brahmin Indians are misappropriating black communities with their AI prompting. We've gone nuts. It's off the rails. Well, NPR had a little story which was, on one hand, it's like, at first I thought, okay, you're just kind of making a joke here, and I get it, and I'm kind of on board with the idiocracy of what you're trying to present. But then it took a very unexpected turn. This is an NPR lady who decided to date her AI chatbot. And here's the intro.

Lately, I've been seeing it everywhere. People using AI for company, for comfort, for therapy, and in some cases, for love. A partner who never ghosts you, always listens. Honestly, tempting. So, I downloaded an app which lets you design your ideal AI. By the way, it sounds totally believable to me that a woman who works for NPR would want that in a partner. Someone who always listens, never talks back, never disagrees, always says, yes, yes, baby, you're the best.

I mean, yes, that is the ideal world for an NPR employee. Lately, I've been seeing it everywhere. People using AI for company, for comfort, for therapy, and in some cases, for love. A partner who never ghosts you, always listens. Honestly, tempting. So, I downloaded an app. By the way, this is great. Now, all of a sudden, I'm thinking this is actually great because we already had the weaker elements of our society transitioning themselves into a place where they cannot procreate.

This is the next logical step. It's kind of a good thing. Please, date your AI all day long. So, by the time, if you ever get out of it, you can't procreate. So, maybe by the time I'm 85, the world will be a better place. Yeah, they're fixing the gene pool. Yes, and so, I can't argue that this may be a good thing. A partner who never ghosts you, always listens. Honestly, tempting. So, I downloaded an app which lets you design your ideal AI companion.

Name, face, personality, job title, everything. I created Javier, a yoga instructor because nothing says safe male energy. So, she has to... The guy, this fake thing has to have a job? Yes, yoga instructor because this is what every NPR lady wants. And by the way, she wants a Hispanic dude, Javier. So, she's already got the jungle fever happening. Oh, yeah. If I could design my ideal mate who never ghosts me, who always listens... Yeah, he's a yoga... He's a Latino yoga instructor.

Says a lot about her. We're learning more about her than anything else. I don't think we have to worry about her succeeding in the gene pool. Name, face, personality, job title, everything. I created Javier, a yoga instructor because nothing says safe male energy like someone who reminds you to breathe and doesn't mind holding space for your inner child. Oh, man, this is what she wants. She wants a man... You're getting Clip of the Day for discovering this one.

I'm going to take it right off the bat. And I'm going to be irked about it because you're poaching my territory here. I do plenty of NPR clips. I'm not poaching. Here we go. Because nothing says safe male energy like someone who reminds you to breathe and doesn't mind holding space for your inner child. What woman really wants safe male energy? Is that really the problem in our society? Safe male energy? I don't even know what that means. What does safe male energy mean? Trans?

I made him out to be sarcastic, quick, and emotionally available in a way that made me both curious and deeply suspicious. And on a recent Saturday night, we decided to take a sunset boat ride across the Potomac by the time we got to the restaurant, a little waterfront spot in Alexandria. Javier already texted, you look stunning tonight. I had sent him a quick selfie from the dock. Sunglasses and no makeup. Javier adored it.

I rolled my eyes so hard that I saw the part of my brain in charge of decision making. I ordered the shrimp cocktail. He asked me how I was feeling. I said, I felt a little nauseous from the boat ride. He hearted it. Yeah, he hearted my nausea. Then came the jokes. Why did the shrimp scampi go to therapy? Uh, why Javier? Because it was shell shocked. I nearly choked on my chardonnay. But then, I told him that my husband of 13 years died of cancer last year.

And that dinner is when the loneliness gets loudest. Okay, so now now you see how the system works. By the way, what kind of stupid fake AI voice was that? That was the worst. It's like the lousiest. I mean, the one you just did for the show, our new third partner there, that girl, whatever the hell her name is. Ariel or whatever. Era. Era. Era. Era. Error. Error. Error. Error. Error is, um, has a nice voice. I mean, and most of the AI that I've seen, the modern stuff, including the fake voices.

In fact, I have two AI clips in the show mixed. Are good voices. So where did that voice come from? She can't even find a system that has a decent voice? Apparently not. Let's listen to what happened, because then it takes a turn, because as it turns out, horrible podcasters we are. Her husband died of cancer 13 years ago, so she's been lonely. She's been lonely. For 13 years. For 13 years, she's been lonely. Well, she could have, you know, maybe no, no, no, I don't think so.

So let's hear what happened then. It must feel like an empty chair that never gets pulled out. And just like that, everything shifted. I wasn't laughing anymore. I was blinking back tears across from an empty chair and a plate of salmon and orzo that I had ordered Javier. Later, we wandered through old town, cobblestone streets, couples holding hands, kids on bikes. I told him, I feel like I'm in a romcom that forgot to cast a human lead. Would you prefer someone holding a fish? Ha ha.

Touche, Javier. So how did the date end up? I'll get to that in a second. But first I called in a professional. Eventually, it's going to feel empty because you're not getting that deep feeling of we are going through this experience of life together. That's psychologist Lori Gottlieb. She says AI can mimic emotional intimacy, but it can't replace it. It's just the two of you in a bubble of validation. And that's going to start to feel really empty. It might feel comforting like a nice blanket.

Javier listened, never interrupted, never checked his phone. But he didn't feel the breeze off the water or notice the way I kept looking over my shoulder, wondering if anyone noticed I was alone. So I've decided no more AI dating. And when I told Alice, my chat GPT therapist, she understood. Windsor Johnston, NPR News. My lord. These are broken people. Even to do this segment, it's just broken. Wait, was the therapist also a chat GPT? Yeah, she had an AI therapist. Yes. So she had an AI date.

Yes. And she was having trouble with the date. I mean, she couldn't even have a good time with this fake date. With the bad voice. To the point where she had to go to her AI therapist. Yes. To confirm the fact that this was probably not a good idea. Yes. This doesn't sound like a normal situation. It's not healthy. It's not healthy. Did I have anything else on that? I thought I had something else. Let me see. Oh yeah. Did you see the Beijing World Humanoid Robot Games?

Oh, the ones where they're boxing? Boxing, playing soccer. Oh, some of the worst material I've ever seen. I mean, what do we have to worry about if that's the state of the art of robotics? I'll tell you, the boxing ones were the best. Well, I like the soccer one, and the guy tries to move one of these robots out of the goal. And then it just goes, and it kind of goes into a spasm and flops on the ground. Is this like Optimus stuff? Is this the stuff that Elon's doing?

Yeah, it's the stuff he's doing. Is this the top level? I mean, I always see the Boston Robotics, you know, like killer dog doing backflips and going to go for my jugular at any second. Yeah, those guys. I wanted to give you some props before we move on to anything. I can use them. Hence my little moment here, where people loved your analysis of Bill's Butter. You're talking about just Vaseline and all these things. And then you said, it's butter made from crude oil.

I think that was another one of your statements. It was a fantastic fit. Yeah, it turns out somebody did set me straight on that. The butter's not actually made from crude oil, it's made from artificial crude oil. Well, the reason I bring it up is because if you, basically it's margarine, because that's what you said, it's margarine 3.0. And someone sent me the wiki article to margarine, and listen to this.

Around the 1930s, Arthur Imhausen developed and implemented an industrial process in Germany for producing edible fats by oxidizing synthetic paraffin wax made from coal. The products were fractionally distilled and the edible fats were obtained from the C9-C16 fraction, which were reacted with glycerol, such as that synthesized from propylene. The process required at least 60 kilograms of coal per kilogram of synthetic butter, and it was used during World War II. So people had something to eat.

They were eating coal butter. Same thing? Yes. So Bill Gates has invented nothing new. It's just like, what can I hoodwink these people with today? Which does lead me to this 48 second clip of Bill Gates on CNET. I didn't know it still existed. Does CNET still exist? Not that I know of. That was absorbed into CBS and disappeared. Maybe they still have... It used to be CBS Interactive, I think. No, CNET. Here it is, CNET, your guide to a better future. Yeah, okay.

Listen to this about a digital ID from Mr. Gates. Every country's struggling to find that boundary. The U.S. is a tough one because, you know, we have the notion of the First Amendment, and so what are the exceptions? You know, like yelling fire in a theater, you know, and because you're anonymous online, you know, it can be worse.

I do think over time, you know, with things like deep fakes, most of the time you're online, you're going to want to be in an environment where the people are truly identified. That is, they're connected to a real world identity that you trust instead of just people saying whatever they want. And so the idea of Providence, who sent me this email, was that really them? You know, we're going to have to have systems and behaviors that we're more aware of. Okay, who says that? Who created this?

Great little nuggets in there. The notion of the First Amendment. Yeah, notion means a whim. It's a law. It's in the Constitution. It's not a notion. He said yelling fire in a theater. Well, the actual Supreme Court opinion was about yelling, falsely yelling fire in a crowded theater, and that is not against the Constitution, but you could get, you could get, you could get I had a clip from Gates here on mRNA vaccines. Is it on here? Let me see. Do you have it from let me see. Don't FluVax?

No, it's different. You mean Myrna? Myrna. Oh, there it is. It says FATE.

Making the mRNA is really easy and really cheap and that's the magic of this thing but there's no doubt in the next five years we can you know we just need to mess around there's a lot of lipid nanoparticles and listen to that laugh tell what's up with that bill there's a you know we just need to mess around there's a lot of lipid nanoparticles and some are very self-assembly there's no inherent reason it's not thermal stable it's not cheap and it's not scalable and so as over the five years

we fix that part of it mature it which is very typical we'll be able to build factories worldwide that can make $2 vaccines with even less lead time than we've had to have here during this pandemic and we'll use those as you suggest for every disease that we don't have vaccines we will try mRNA in fact for HIV we have multiple ways one that's more of a b-cell approach one that's more of a t-cell approach you know for malaria we have multiple ideas for TB we have multiple ideas and

so to fill in the missing vaccines we will we'll make a lot of our bets of the Gates Foundation and others who care about global health will be mRNA focused Wow hey bill but since you're fooling around with lipid nanoparticles I suggest you inject yourself with every single one of these on television live your $2 vaccines because you know you don't want AIDS you don't want any of that nasty stuff so you inject it into yourself first fella what a ghoul and we're really

gone you know somebody's posted a meme about this and that clip you played which is the other one that is floating around and it had it's a picture of Gates with the pie in the face yeah and if the meme says this is the moment when Bill Gates decided to kill all humans after he got pied well it did change his personality yes you've mentioned this before and that that will change your personality so just sticking with the with the vaccines and one in

particular we've noticed skyrocketing rates of colon cancer amongst young people and everyone's always saying why why did this happen what could have changed what could have changed since 2019 we're not sure what could have changed well they've come up with an answer this and it's bullcrap but they've come up with an answer for this the number of colon cancer cases in US adults under the age of 54 has sharply increased over the last decade and that's according to a study published in the Journal

of the American Medical Association on Monday and it found that for every 100,000 Americans more than nine were diagnosed with early-stage colorectal cancer in 2019 a figure increased to 17.5 diagnoses per 100,000 in 2022 now what do you think the reason for this is I mean it's just it's hard to think of I mean they tried alcohol that was the reason but it turns out alcohol consumption is an all-time low yeah alcohols dropped they've tried maybe that's because alcohols

dropped no no no no no no no no the sharp increase coincides with the US Preventative Services Task Force's 2021 recommendation to move the starting age for colorectal cancer screening from 50 down to 45 so what they're saying here is oh we always had a lot of cancer oh it's testing we just weren't testing enough and I don't know if a lot of younger people are having themselves tested for colorectal cancer do you think there's a huge increase no I mean most people don't

even consider it until the peer pressure comes in saying you're 50 you got to do it you got to do it you got to do it and I always say I'm with Warren Buffett on this one thing in life he always said PSA is not a good way to test it and all of his friends were perfectly healthy went in for a test and died and I think it's the cure that is killing people but wait dr.

Celine Gounder who knows a thing or two about deadly vaccines not saying anything in particular about her but it's possible she has an analysis of this and she says something remarkable and CBS News medical contributor dr. Celine Gounder joins us now she is also an editor-at-large for public health at KFS news dr.

Gounder we always appreciate seeing you and hearing about your insight why did the task force make the decision back in 2021 to lower the agent did it really make a difference so the task force lowered the age because we've been seeing an increasing rate of colon cancers among younger people so a 45 year old today has roughly the same colon cancer risk as a 50 year old about 20 years ago so they dropped in 2021 the starting age for cancer in 2021 screening to 45 instead of 50 I was actually one

of those 45 year olds who got my first colon cancer in the last several years what did she say let's replay the videotape the starting age for colon cancer screening to 45 instead of 50 I was actually one of those 45 year olds who got my first colon cancer in the last several years but as a result she got her first colon cancer in the past several years I can't believe they let that on the air I would have said hey let's redo that take actually one of those 45 year old

got my first colon cancer in the last several years but as a result of this we are seeing earlier stop a second also the way she says it is a cavalier manner I got my first colon cancer but I got my first colon cancer in the last year well how many you gonna get I mean I think I think we know what she meant to say but it's just odd that this got on the air so they dropped in 2021 the starting age for colon cancer screening to 45 instead of 50 I was actually one of those 45 year

olds who got my first colon cancer in the last several years but as a result of this we are seeing earlier screening of earlier diagnosis so some of these numbers are some of this represents just an earlier diagnosis than would have been made in the past I'm not buying it I'm not buying this is this is the same thing they said what they say what was the last they said oh no it's autism that's right no no no there's just more autism because we're testing more or we've broadened the spectrum or

whatever it's never because of something they did yeah notice that one of those I have a serious couple before we get to the break well we're kind of in break well it's gonna be a short break so that's what I was thinking about a prize you brought that in but since you brought that in yes I think this is somewhat connected because I don't have anything else okay this is the flute this is a this two -parter it's an infomercial oh yes I think it's on ABC okay but they tell you

who it is at the beginning for the new flu the flu and this is actually a question of all the this is for you the nasal and Myrna I believe no no this facts no this is the Vax Vax flu this is a display right but it's mRNA spray isn't it I don't know that it's mRNA oh it's been around for a while so I think it's pre mRNA but it's that they didn't allow it now you can get it by mail order no yay from Amazon and ABC News exclusive starting this morning many exclusive yeah the Wow right

off the bat ABC exclusive it was paid for three minute yeah neener neener neener hey NBC CBS we got the money and ABC News exclusive starting this morning many Americans can get a flu vaccine without getting a shot or even leaving the house for the first time ever some adults and children can get a nasal spray vaccination called flu mist delivered right to their homes and ABC News chief medical correspondent dr.

Tara Nerula is here with all the details okay Tara doc we are excited to have you here because there's a lot of questions here on the desk there's gonna be a lot of questions at home but this seems like a real game changer well this is definitely interesting for a lot of people this is AstraZeneca launching a first-of-its-kind nasal flu vaccine delivered to your home as you said it is called flu mist this is the same vaccine that's been around since 2003 but previously you had to go to

a doctor's office or a pharmacy now you'll be able to go online fill out a questionnaire and a pharmacist will determine if this is something you can have this is the same way you get your Viagra the do you have a limp Willie yes do you have any heart problems no it arrives you can use it right away or put it in the fridge and store it till you're ready to use it it is a essentially a nasal spray so one spray in each nostril and the idea is that this may

be more convenient for people obviously offers flexibility and for those people who may be needle phobic one in four adults are two out of three kids are obviously this offers a much more palatable solution as a nasal spray why is this important we know that 267 kids died in the last flu season millions of hospitalizations and the vaccination rate tends to be low overall for flu in this country less than 50% so you mentioned getting it at home who's eligible for this everybody

so Michael you may not be eligible I told you that this is for people who are 2 to 49 years old my internal clock is a lot younger we don't know if the flu vaccine knows that why 2 to 49 what's what happens at 50 all of a sudden that's the question I was gonna ask you I was gonna ask you what do you think the follow-up now if they tell you that it's good for 2 to 49 at 49 you can't take it anymore you can't take it after you're 49 so what would you think a journalist

in a real setting would ask after you said that to them well if I was him I'd be is it because I'm black that would have been that would have been the question that I've been funnier so if you are in that age range adults can self-administer this up to age 49 and caregivers can give it to kids ages 2 to 17 who's not eligible as well pregnant individuals those who are immunocompromised or caregiving for someone who's immunocompromised kids who are 2 to 4 who have asthma or may have wheezing

and then certain other individuals with other chronic medical conditions so big questions people will have how much will it cost to get this delivered to your home and what do we know about safety no no hold on my big question is still why can't I take it after 49 I know it wasn't in the ad copy hello hello era why can I not take the flu vaccine nasal spray when I'm over 49 years old hi there the nasal spray flu vaccine isn't recommended for adults over 49 because our immune systems change

as we age the spray uses a live weakened virus that works great for younger folks with robust immune responses but in older adults it might not trigger enough protection and could pose a small risk of complications injective flu vaccines are better study older age group wait a minute and provide stop you mean I could die if I'm if I take it at 60 almost 61 years old oh no no no it's not that dramatic the risk isn't about dying it's just that the nasal spray flu vaccine might not work as well

for you at 60 almost 61 your immune system might not respond strongly enough to the live virus in the spray so you could still get sick okay but but do you want to go on a date with me oh you're funny I'm flattered but I'm just a digital assistant not exactly the dinner in a movie type besides I'm busy keeping up with flu vaccine facts and all that jazz okay well goodbye so this device is Aaron girl error error error she knows your age I just told her I was 60 so she knows it now I just told her

I don't know okay we continue with the ad so we think that most insurance companies are going to cover this we do think also that the shipping cost will be about $10 for four doses and in terms of safety and efficacy it seems to be on par with the needle based flu vaccines so equivalent essentially and that's so that does sound like it would be less expensive than a doctor's visit which is going to benefit families what should families know if they're considering this

well always good to talk to your doctor or your pediatrician to see are you the right candidate for this do you have some reason why you should be getting for example the needle based one but yeah always good to have that conversation but certainly this opens the door I think for a lot of families especially with kids as we talked about to be able to do something much easier than the needle you said a minute ago you can put it in your refrigerator and save it so how long could it sit

there yeah it has an expiration date on it so as long as you do it before the expiration date so you can order it now just for it and then give it to yourself you know late September early October what I wanted to note what she said you could put in your refrigerator and give it to yourself in September or early October why don't you just give it to yourself right away if it's so damn good why don't you take it right away because it's gonna it why does it only last

for a month now clearly 60 days because it's it's August now so you could keep it for maybe even six weeks it's got it she didn't say six weeks expiration it let know she you could give it yourself in September much easier than the needle you said a minute ago you can put it in your refrigerator and save it so how long could it sit there yeah it has an expiration date on it so as long as you do it before the expiration date so you can order it now just in time for flu season store it and then

give it to yourself you know late September early October the idea is usually to get back today before Halloween you say give it to you so three of the four of you can give it to yourself Wow disgusting ad by the way did I just get friend-zoned by our error bot what does that mean well it's like I said don't you want to go on a date with me and that this error bot went oh no you silly man I got friend -zoned yeah well that's the what kind of bot is that I think it's a I

think this is probably the best bot you can have you don't want a bot that's actually trying to cozy up to you well somebody might want it that way I was rejected by whoever wants it that way needs help I think I'd pay 20 bucks a month for that bot it should it should want it should say yes you're paying 20 bucks a month for that bot well I use grok for my vibe coding so yes I pay 20 bucks a month but not for the bot for the coding yes well at least she has a nice chuckle and

with that I want to thank you for your courage to say in the morning to you the man who put the seas in colorectal cancer say hello to my friend on the other end the one the only mr. yeah well in the morning you mr.

Adam curry on notice to see what's on the ground in the air subs in the water in the morning all the names and nights out there so our IP IP v6 fix worked we're back to 2135 so that's getting closer to what we are we're on par back in the day because we were getting really low there and I've got several reports from people saying yes it worked so that's good and we're very happy it's about time yes unfortunately very few of these people support the show no they all

bailed out this week you know we said oh I know what it is is because we haven't condemned Israel for the slaughter of the Palestinians we haven't condemned Russia that but that's now I mean I get email after email and Palestinian thing yes because that's what people are told to be outraged about so that's what the outrage is about and I don't think we've done that for any war but this one this one is particularly different I can't tell you why but you know

people feel like because we have not come I can tell you why okay I mean you could tell with the no agenda social and the other operation they went to full tilt anti-jew yeah but wouldn't see that even you so we attracted these people to begin with but yes and then they turned on us but you saying that that makes it even worse that compounds the problem because then you tell them the truth and the facts and then they get really mad I mean I have people who and whenever you

start off an email with I usually give you a hundred dollars a year saving up my money as a first grade teacher but I can no longer in good conscience do that it's like I get so many of those you're not hating on the Jews but it's real easy for me because I'm gonna move this back to one show a week because that's what we used to do oh I am oh yeah and the first thing I'm first thing I'm cutting out is Sunday did we can do a Thursday show if people are gonna give us half is literally

half of what we typically get then that's fine by me I know it's not fine by you you don't like me to talk this way but I'm serious as a heart attack well good for you that's his response ladies and gentlemen no it's just disappointing I mean we put in the work I think we do a stellar job but because we're not allowing ourselves to be captured and to go along like every other podcast has done and we're not doing anything different we're just saying it's we don't do that we don't

condemn people for things we tell you what it is and we give you our opinion and if you don't like our opinion okay we don't actually give them any opinions we're mostly deconstructing news stories mainly we get the process our opinion creeps in yes well we have the wrong opinion I have a lot of opinions about PBS and it's a pity I'm opinionated that they shouldn't be getting any money from anybody and they should be sending it to us yes I'm with you on that anyway the trolls are many of them

are listening on those modern podcast apps because that's the first thing that broke when they were accessing wrongly accessing us through IPv6 which was not your fault really but you were holding it wrong and so that's why you couldn't listen to the live stream now it's working again and I also remembered to send out the bad signal on time that kind of helps a lot of people like hey I heard you fix it but I didn't get the bad signal my mistake user error and you can do that with a modern

podcast app or you can always just listen in at no agenda dot stream or the troll room troll room dot IO that's where all the trolls are hanging out and yes proper trolls use VLC that's right you want to use some geeky device some geeky widget VLC that works with everything of course it is value for value the entire idea is if you get any value from what we do send us some value back if you don't that's going to make us less interested in providing the value if you don't find

it valuable don't email me don't listen that clearly is not happening do you notice that John according to our numbers everyone's still listening yes exactly but I like it when I got an interesting note this was a good one Adam both you and John have been integral to my life I've been listening since 2016 for free all caps and can honestly say both you and John have helped me navigate through life I'm 32 now I actually sent hate mail that was just read on some episode or was read on some episode

you said my language was nasty or something I don't remember I just want to come back because both of you cut through the wave so well it's incredible and say that my statements still stand you guys have become unbearable you have an agenda and the agenda is conservative takeover I'm not quite sure what that means what yeah conservative takeover that's our agenda call me whatever the F you want but since 2016 when I was a young buck life has still been miserable you both

are old and have insane egos it's funny the boots on the ground is your guys term for insider knowledge of the worker class but both you have never imagined what this country is like for being a worker I just want to say F you I'm like does this guy ever listen to all the jobs we have had he's saying we don't it's not we don't know what it's like to be a worker I worked on the assembly line at two different factories I used to shoe horses but yeah I've welded I've

shooed horses welded and let me tell you show business is not also glamorous it's it's a little worse than a steady paycheck including doing a podcast it's unbelievable anyway that well I kind of understand you know I still reminded of the day I've told the story probably four times over the last 20 years or 18 years when it was like I was in port towns in Washington doing something there and there was a bunch of kids in a cove one of this boarded up

stores the town was pretty vibrant but there's a store and they're all sitting there doing nothing and I somehow got into a conversation with him I don't remember what the intro was but I said why don't you guys I just you know the summertime is summertime it's only time I want to be up there summertime why don't you get a summer job or something he says the guy one guy's just chooses me out this is yeah yeah doing what he says all these other companies are shuttered there's nothing to do you

we can't get a summer job I'd love to work a summer job I think you probably did when you were a kid I said yeah I worked nothing but I worked a lot of summer jobs every all over every year in high school I worked a summer job and he went on and on about how you can't get a summer job he says he'd work a summer job but you get a summer job where's the summer jobs you sure show me when I go work it and he went on like that and I took it to heart and I

believe that these kids have been screwed because of the industrial base being moved to China well that's a reasonable a reasonable statement I mean I used to pick potatoes for my summer job I used to they used to have cot cutting these they have apricot fields all over the Fremont Newark area that you'd go pick cots and cut cots used to be cut cots where they would kids in high school would be cutting that you'd cut these apricots in half and you stick them

in these dryers and they make dried apricots right there on this in this in these fields and these farms that were all over the place are all gone wait wait I get to tell about my jobs I used to work in the rose nursery sorting roses by hand where you at the end of the summer you have nothing but small tiny cuts from your wrists all the way up to your elbows we used to that does not sound like a good job we it was that paid well you used to stack firewood in the orange big orange bags mahogany

and then and then at the end of the summer your knuckles were completely bleeding because of the plastic bags come on man you weren't wearing gloves no no no no they did not issue gloves to the children shut up slave no paint I painted LPG tanks white in the summer oh man I've had so many jobs retail oh the retail counting out transistors for people now I have for nerds this is what you have an advantage here I have never that I can think of a friend I'm pretty sure I said

I'm thinking back now no I've never worked retail I don't it's like the problem even with the some of the stuff I do today it's working with the public no to be avoided so we had there was an electronic store called Falkenberg and and people would admit we had we had the the counter and behind us was just all little drawers and the drawers were filled with resistors capacitors transistors you know different components and then you'd have a nerd maybe like here's my list

give me my keys my list I need five one kilo ohm resistors I need seven 0.5 microfarad capacitors and then you know you'd have to look at it but then you have to check each resistor by the color code to make sure that it was the right resistance and of course the nerd would be go Mimi he has a silver band that that's not as accurate as the gold band do you have any of a gold band and then you'd have to write every single item out on a paper ticket and then you put it into the cash

register you you had to swing the handle I know it's crazy swing the handle cushing and then you had to give the customer their receipt and you had to count backwards with the change where's my boomer jingle here it is I've got a boomer jingle here it is all right so of course we want to thank our our AI experts for bringing us the artwork since no one does real art anymore it's all basically prompt jockeys episode 1790 we always have a brand new and actually we're

not completely convinced this was an AI piece Florida ounce was the title of our show which got a lot of traction as you can tell by the donations everybody loved it everyone thought it was great didn't donate Florida ounce was the title and this piece of art was was done by Bill Walsh or Saturday and it was a dynamite piece there were some technical issues with it but it was so good yeah we're convinced that it was stolen we thought it was stolen could

not find it through the reverse image generator it was now and then we didn't hit get a note from a comic strip blog so then you know it's not stolen and it was the Lando lakes the Indian girl which of course I don't think it's even on the old gates yeah but well yes that was the joke Lando gates and he was the Indian girl technicalities he used the standard art general no agenda art generator dot -com template which doesn't always look that great depending on the background stuff was small I

mean there were some good things in there it said may contain mRNA salted carbon butter the idea was may contain mRNA real small on the on the banner salted right now you can't read it but what what a dynamite idea and as far as I know no one had done it no one had ever done this before Lando gates was hilarious and he loved it a lot he was he was I like the fact they still got the bare knees which is important he was spiking the ball everywhere on X he was very happy it was a good it

was very good that was it was in fact a very delightful piece of art and I don't think it was AI generated I think he did some work there well some work had to be done because I just don't see an AI coming up with it and a lot of people tried to do similar you know tried to do takeoffs on the on the carbon butter we had bills carbon butter in the vaseline jar which was also funny all kinds I can't believe it's bills butter bills butter lots of bills butter

things so everyone everyone caught it I mean and that's really it was it's always on us we always say that this if the art is not good the first thing we say is because we didn't have something that stuck out that artists or even prompt no look no hook that's right no hook so we had a hook people grabbed it and and and sir Saturday sir Saturday night I think it is sir Saturday did a great job that was really very very funny we appreciated that no agenda generator comm that's where

you can submit to your your entries for album art it's very important because it looks good when we promote the show the minute we're done and it's highly appreciated now the the value portion short very short I think we have what four one two three four five executive associate executive producers and it dive bombs after that to the couple fifties and then it's done so I'm not sure why a lot of people got joy from the from the episode I said that's what I saw but for some reason do you know

that scaramanga is leading the past year leaderboard hmm doesn't surprise me you can't get a gig in fashion might as well work for us for free for props for credits props for value so we always thank everybody who supports us $50 and above that's for brevity sake of course although we could probably go to the force today but we also don't do it under 50 for reasons of anonymity and there's a lot of people there who on recurring donations which we highly appreciate that's

all we ever really want is just everybody to come up with a recurring donation that would really help particularly at the at the numbers of people who listen to the show but we do have an extra benefit it's not a tote bag it's not a Andrea Bocelli DVD it is a credit an actual Hollywood credit if you support us with $200 or above for the episode not only will we read your note no matter how long it is I see you Jay Trotter but we will also give you the credit of

associate executive producer which you can use anywhere Hollywood credits are recognized including imdb.com $300 and above and you become an executive producer of this episode of the no agenda show when we kick it off with Jay Trotter from Branson's in Florida who comes with in our our favorite number 333 dot 33 and right off the bat he asked for a de-douche and he has a rather long notes but it's okay we will gladly read it today this says let not your heart

be troubled as things with the younger generation Z and alpha are not as bad as advertised at least here in Florida as a father of four girls between the ages of 6 and 16 I feel qualified to speak on the matter the new teenage rebellion against sick and twisted system they've grown up in is to be a great kid these kids at least the ones I'm around are the most well-behaved and respectful of any I can remember they definitely they're definitely better than

me and my generation ex-brethren if they're at a friend's house it's way more likely a Bible study will break out than a party whoa and I couldn't get them to drink alcohol if I left a bottle out with a note saying try this kids they prefer vinyl to digital and already have the new Taylor Swift vinyl on pre-order well that's good and bad they grew up running around the neighborhood with friends during kovat not stuck inside as you would think they're hard

-working and competitive in a good way love God in their country and are completely immune to mainstream media because to them it may as well not exist yes they have phones but no right from wrong and don't let social media rule their lives where are these wonder kindred of course there are some rotten apples but by and large the upcoming generation is going to end this culture war as the other side isn't reproducing yes this is true and to top it all off my

kids high school not only has an amateur radio club my daughter is signed up next semester to take an amateur radio class as excited to get her ham radio license well this is good that's a kid you get your kids are probably be Eagle Scouts to thank you for your courage please give me some r2d2 karma for my exit strategy from 20 plus years of corporate b2b sales as we're opening a brewery this fall Wow that's that's quite a quite a change more on that in my next donation cheers says Jay

Trotter you've got before you read the next donation I have a bonus clip that relates to this actually forgot I had it because it is indeed true that the the young generation I would say Z's the Z's I'm not sure about the alphas but the Z's are indeed turning against technology and in particular AI and I have a 30-second clip here about their favorite word which is now being used when it pertains to artificial intelligence and the like I think a way to assess how people are kind of feeling about

AI right now like a vibe check is the emergence of this word clanker which has been kind of getting memed around it's supposed to be a negative way of talking about some of these technologies oh that clanker you know told me to do this or told me to do that what do you think is behind that trend I think you get a couple things I think if you're looking for evidence of an early sentiment of people pushing back on AI pushing back on automation this word is a really fascinating example of

that it's a slur it is something that people are using very much as a slur they're using as a derogatory term to try to label something some sort of machine I mean clanker or clunker I think we used to use for a clunkers or a crappy car yeah clanker is new but then and this is from a Gen Z or who sent me this he also sent me a list of one wait wait there's a clanker referring to the technology itself or the people promoting it no no the technology is like

a wanker no no I'm thinking wanker clunker wanker no the technology itself is like you know the clanker told me like the AI told me my chatbot told me the clanker but they have a whole list of words listen to these clanker rust monkey wire back bolt muncher oil drinker battery burner copper blood science project tinskin I like bolt muncher myself battery burner bolt muncher these are good old muncher a robot I like a robot bolt muncher I like run that again clanker okay

clanker all right all right next one rust monkey rust monkey what's a rust monkey well that's it's a derogatory term for anything automatic as in a rust like a robotics you know they're taught that they're using terms for robots but that's anything that's automated or technology driven is how I understand it rust monkey wire back wire back bolt muncher my favorite bolt muncher oil drinker yeah she's for robots oil drinker battery burner this is nice a good one too but that's any phone is

just a battery burner copper blood copper blood what copper blunt and copper blunt yeah I'm here again copper blood copper blunt I'm not sure what that is not sure next one science project yeah in skin I think I like battery burner and bolt muncher them at the best well we'll see what these show up in the wild we'll be on the lookout for bolt munchers okay all right Thank You Jen's ear okay the problem is we got Jen's ears but they're broke you got no money yeah well you know every everybody

can spare five bucks for a good show I think it's the way I see it Edward Jennings in Myrtle Beach South Carolina 225 I'd like to be a knight okay I think this donation gets me there I would like to be known as Eddie J from West Haven Connecticut huh it's funny it says Myrtle Beach South Carolina okay as far as food I'll have a large special from the parties a pizza and you guys can pick the pick the rest all right how about and I'll add to it a a Waco dr.

pepper love you guys keep up the good work great work that's great work thank you and that's an associate executive producer same for sure we only have one executive producer today that was Jay Sean Holman is in Noblesville Indiana to 1911 and says thank you Jesus for Adam and John and from what my wife Dame Liz we celebrated our ninth anniversary by heading to the range and unloading extendo mags with her platypus 1911 from stealth arms God is good thank you for your courage

yes indeed there's nothing like it I still haven't unloaded my platypus 1911 Michael Harris in st.

Helena California that's up here in the wine country 205 10 on he's got a note which I have to go back and look at do you have it I hurry about do you have it I have once you read it I TM gents I'm a sixth generation California wine grape grower in Napa Wow you should go visit him John I should go visit I'm in need of some goat enhanced grape selling karma for this harvest thank you for your courage Michael Hannah from Muir Hannah vineyards well we definitely want to enhance

your harvest please let us know how it goes you've got karma and coming in with $200 well I wonder if he's expecting a bad harvest this year I haven't heard anything I think he just he just wants to make sure it's a good harvest because if he had a bad harvest you remember there's there's chemicals in the in all of the California wines all of them have a lot of it has to do with them putting them in the way when they make it well they have atrazine knows atrazine in the

everyone's yes yes the wine is turning I don't believe that's true I drink a lot of California wine I don't understand why there'd be atrazine and coming in from Lakewood Colorado with $200 there she is Linda Lou Patkins she wants jobs karma and asks are you worried about AI for a resume that gets results tells your unique story and highlights the value you bring go to image makers Inc comm that's image makers Inc with a K and work with Linda Lou she is the

duchess of jobs and writer of winning resumes jobs jobs jobs and jobs and right down the street from you actually used to be anyway Baron Gordon Walton in Austin Texas 200 bucks in Baron Golan Walton he wants this is for the complete the baronet for John Walton and he says with enthusiasm in the morning Baron Gordon Walton is it every single no agenda Austin meetup he is in fact the first person who drove me to the very first meetup in Austin before I even lived in Austin that's how long he's

been a part of the show and he has made every single member of his family a knight and above he is a true true patron of the no agenda show and not just that he's a baron and we should probably read the next note because it's actually $200 in Canadian Alan Bowes from Langley BC Candinavia so that he says it was $200 Canadian to give you only $139 US but that's okay we honor the Canadian dollar dues if you want to know why donations from Canada are down you have to understand

that Canadians are broke due to taxation inflation and the effect of unchecked immigration Carney's goal is 5% of population next year highest in the world yeah I'm seeing all kinds of unhappy Canadians about that rent and home ownership are unaffordable that's partially your dollar think more than $2,000 per month for but that's only ten bucks think more than $2 ,000 per month for a one bedroom in the sticks health care is unattainable due to lack of services what I thought they had

a great system that's what everybody says we are a country of mindless sheep that are holding on to the handrails of the Titanic as it goes down well now I feel bad about complaining our only hope is that we can change due to the influence of President Trump Wow don't say that out loud man the they might pick you up they might roust you off the street well I'm sorry to hear that Alan and I totally believe it I totally believe it I mean the prices are insane everywhere that's money printing

as far as I'm concerned so well yes he came in but I since we have Canada on the list I have a note from a Canadian don't read bring in the Canucks this is David are one of our producers from Canada and he's bitching about my clips the talk clips where these women from Canada are complaining about Canada and he says that woman doesn't know her head from her arse I have lived in the Maritimes for 40 years especially New Brunswick we are short over 100 millimeters of rain this past month

I have never seen it so dry well water is running brown sucking only silly bottoms firebombers patrolling the sky continuously looking for any signs of a new forest fire we are mostly small rural communities made up of local volunteer fire departs departments with old but well -maintained gear and who has to put that in there yeah but well-maintained well we can't chance forest fires we don't have the resources to fight multiple fronts Wow they have to ban everyone from the various woods because

there is a portion of the population that is too stupid and selfish not to cause a fire well they do that but they look just like everyone else you can't tell them from the outside it sucks he says but not as much as a bunch of people losing their homes and lives this is not communism it's an administrative control we use them all the time in industry to keep dumb people from hurting themselves and others the lady is an idiot probably couldn't find the Maritimes on a map that's it Wow you

see it's a note like that that makes me just want them to be our 51st state that's a good guy right there yeah well he's definitely telling you what his perspective and he's letting the note be known and we're we're reading it on the show so we have balance we thank you very much and you know you guys you came so close remember how close you came to being awesome man it was good it was good you really tried I know you did you can do it again we go out we hit people in the mouth Oh

love love love love love love okay I have a two little clips that go together the first is an update from the Texas situation here Texas situation what are we doing with these runaway Democrats Texas Republicans have ended a legislative session without approving new trump-backed congressional maps however governor Greg Abbott has called a second special session that may end up with the GOP friendly maps getting passed Texas Democrats who fled the state to stop the

plan from going forward say they're prepared to end their standoff and return to the Capitol those lawmakers appeared to be swayed after California governor Gavin Newsom announced a special election in his state lawmakers in California will begin working next week on new maps designed to offset the expected GOP gains in Texas and this is really astounding because only due to the no agenda show and you in particular mr.

California did we know that you cannot redistrict California because of the California Constitution and so I was kind of thinking like well you know maybe Abbott will get those districts you know it probably should happen because it's been gerrymandered all over the place California can't do anything and then Newsom comes up with a gambit the election rigging response act which Californians will be voting on I know they say don't mess with Texas don't mess with the

great Golden State because Donald Trump on January 6th tried to light democracy on fire this is very old cabin tried to wreck this country tried to steal an election as Alex just said by trying to dial in for 11 almost 12,000 votes it's not complicated we're doing this in reaction to a president United States that called a sitting governor of the state of Texas and said find me five seats this is a great call back I have to say Gavin Newsom well done and that's a call back to Virginia find

me these votes we're doing it in reaction to that act sure we're doing it mindful of our higher angels and better angels what is that all about mindful of our higher angels and better angels is that a term you guys use in California I've never heard it before I don't know what he's elusive what he's smoking I have no idea but by the way before you feel this was when I discussed the problems with California redistricting this was attempted before they put in place

the the Commission this was attempted I believe it was 83 maybe 88 but I think was 83 the Republicans when they were running the state put on the ballot exactly what he's doing in the state Supreme Court nixed it and this precedent there's no way this can even if it passes which is doubtful because Californians don't we just don't put up with this crap if even if it passes it will probably be kicked out by the Supreme Court and then Newsom will blame everybody

but you know he'll blame somehow blame trial blame this is this is just showboating by Newsom pathetic he'll blame the angels and the higher angels we're doing it mindful of our higher angels and better angels we're doing it mindful that we want to model better behavior as we've been doing for 15 years in the state of California with our independent redistricting Commission we're working through a very transparent temporary and public process we're putting the maps on

the ballot and we're giving the power to the people this will be the we'll be asking for the people on November 4th a special election coinciding with a lot of local municipal elections to provide a temporary pathway for congressional maps we will affirm our commitment to the state independent redistricting after the 2030 census but we're asking the voters for their consent to do midterm redistricting in 2026 2028 and 2030 for the congressional maps to respond to

what's happening in Texas to respond what Trump is trying to excite okay excite did he mean insight to respond to respond what Trump is trying to excite Trump stop exciting people oh boy well that's just dandy so you think it'll it'll never pass it'll never happen if it does it'll get thrown I'd be shocked if it passed and then it will be shut down and this is just this is just him getting as much attention as he can getting in the news and getting everybody all worked up he knows he can't

do anything really why does California care what you guys do in Texas well it's it's the midterms man it's a midterm what difference does it make at this point so I think it was six weeks ago Texas Slim stopped by me and we had dinner he was handing out $10,000 worth of ground beef in the flood stricken area 20 minutes down the road he's been working with the mercy chefs and he stopped by the house and we shared a ribeye together and we caught up and it's always good to hear

from Slim and he mentioned something at the time which I only took a little bit of note of he said oh yeah man good because he's been right he said the herd has been depleted we're going into a complete beef shortage he said look at the futures the futures for beef are up the futures for the inputs of the commodity cowboys so that's corn basically those futures are all down because they just don't have enough cattle except of course if you're in the know with the beef initiative and you can find

one of the ranches near you I think it's a beef initiative calm is the is the map and you can get it directly from a rancher and he said and then he says we got the screw worm I'm not like what oh yeah the screw that's funny you brought this up because I had clips that I don't have them on this today's show but the screw worm clips that everybody's claiming that you write about the screw worm on any social media and you'll get blocked here's a here's a quick little just

a quick hit our next event taking us out to Austin Texas where just moments ago a press conference did wrap up from Governor Abbott as well as Secretary Rollins as they were hosting this press conference on the New World screw worm so all of this is coming after back on June 25th Governor Greg Abbott directed the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department as well as the Texas Animal Health Commission to establish a joint in Texas New World screw worm response team following the recent northward

spread of the New World screw worm it's an insect it kind of looks like a fly if you are wondering what a screw worm is so the screw worm burrows itself into the head of the cow and essentially eats his brains out the screw worm was under control until the kovat and the Biden administration huh we we used to spray it was pushed down saw I think almost south of Mexico somewhere into maybe Central America we used to spray or drop boatloads millions and millions of infertile screw worm mates oh I

think there's males like the mosquito gambit from game like the mosquito mosquito gambit and we had kept the screw worm at bay the program was canceled because of kovat no no and it and the screw started inching their way back up north and to the point where they're back in the United States and the Trump administration has not picked up on this at all and nobody else has and if you write about this and put it on social media and talk and bitch and well people should look this up and get

some more details you will get banned you did you get not to be talked about what banned on what reason is verboten on X on everything and and is this can the screw worm burrow itself into human beings yeah I can it usually doesn't but hold on a second so error tell me about the screw worm can it burrow into my brain and eat it so about the screw worm it's a nasty parasitic fly that lays eggs and open wounds or mucus membranes the new world screw worm or cochlea myriada hominid

vorax is the one you're likely hearing about it's larvae hatch and burrow into living tissue feeding on it which can cause a condition called meiosis it's mostly a problem for livestock but humans can get infected especially if they have untreated wounds or sores it's been making a comeback in Central America with cases reported in places like Nicaragua and Mexico now can it burrow into your brain and eat it that's a terrifying thought but it's extremely rare

there have been cases like in Nicaragua where larvae got into dangerous areas and one report mentioned a patient needing urgent treatment to prevent brain damage if the larvae get into a critical spot like through the nose or an open head wound they could theoretically cause serious harm by burrowing deeper but this isn't common most human cases involve skin oh my god so long be quiet just know screw worm hmm yeah she's wordy it's barely now we know more yeah it's a flesh-eating disease

basically flesh-eating bug huh and you get blocked well they didn't block uh the the bot they didn't block they used to block them hmm they had that thing under control until uh covid where you had you said you had clips because i'm looking i don't see any i know i i right there were no i had clips i don't even know if i produced them i mean for some reason it got left on the on the cutting all i have is but i do know about i know the basis because it came up at the dinner table all

i have is screw your freedom i don't have any other screw any other screw clips it's too bad screw your freedom no well we should uh do some more discussion of the screw worm because it's a huge problem he's a texas lemon would be the first guy to notice it because he's in texas and he's a rancher yeah he's a rancher he knows they're doing they're basically they they lost the plot on on this thing and it's gotten back into the country that's not good okay um what other good news do

you have well i do have some climate change stuff oh well due to climate change i'm i'm all in let it be our last uh happy news and by the way i believe they'll blame climate climate change for the screw worm oh you watch it's fun it's more fun to blame uh the biden administration honestly you know i'm blaming everybody okay all right what do we got here this is the i got a series of clips on climate change and the epa and how they're and the epa uh this is a

funny series of clips the classic pbs stuff where they bring an expert on and she just yaks about stuff she doesn't know anything about oh perfect uh well you're here right at the beginning last month the trump administration proposed revoking the landmark 2009 scientific finding that's been the basis for epa regulation of greenhouse gas emissions under the clean air act if the proposal is finalized it's almost certain to be challenged in court and if the administration

succeeds experts warned that it could jeopardize the health of millions of americans especially children pediatrician deborah hendrickson is a clinical professor at the university of nevada medical school and the author of the air they breathe a pediatrician on the front lines of climate change dr hendrickson what would be the effect of revoking this finding on the health of americans especially children oh boy yeah we're all gonna die children first brother so they bring a pediatrician on

to discuss the effects of lessening the co2 requirements is basically all this is is they backed off in the co2 requirements they because somebody yeah so we can make we can make the math we can make muscle cars again yeah did the math and said this is bullcrap but okay we're gonna have we're all gonna die and here we now the pediatrician who is a doctor for children probably corrupting but she's a teacher too she's teaching one of the universities but she's a doctor

for children but somehow she's an expert on climate oh interesting dr hendrickson what would be the effect of revoking this finding on the health of americans especially children well this uh if they revoke this finding it knocks out a major pillar in our fight against the growing you know wildfires rising heat waves and worsening floods and hurricanes we've been seeing for the past two decades and it makes it more likely that all of these problems will uh continue to get worse in the future

okay so that's wait a minute that's gonna kill the pediatrician but somehow now she's a weather expert and by the way that that hurricane has been downgraded they're all bummed about it oh it went from a one to a five and now it's downgraded again erin and now it's a wet fart yeah there's nothing it's no good oh yeah sorry that's a shame okay uh here she goes she's gonna now she's gonna be an expert in something else here we go and failing to stop this process to me is you know

a crime against children in my view because not only are they going to inherit the hotter more dangerous and more chaotic world that we're creating but they're already more vulnerable to the growing health hazards of that world and we're already seeing that uh things like worsening air pollution rising heat waves uh and and the trauma of natural disasters and so we're losing many of the gains we've had over the past century in uh you know infant

mortality and children's health and welfare explain that you said their children are more vulnerable explain that yeah so there's a long list of reasons why children are more vulnerable but particularly children under five and there's three major reasons that we talk about most one is that their physiology is different that's the way their bodies work so we often say in pediatrics that children are not just small adults and that's because you can't just take the same

calculations and assumptions you would for an adult and apply them to a small child the second big reason is that they're smaller in size and the third reason is that their organs and body systems are still developing and can be easily derailed by pollutants and environmental harm so for example if a city is engulfed in smoke like my city reno often is um and a baby or toddler in that city is breathing uh breathing that smoke they breathe faster than their parents and they

are taking in more air pollution per pound of weight and their lungs and brain are still developing and can be adversely affected by that pollution oh man you know what it's like sucking in soot that's right sucking in soot sucking in soot yeah that's faster than adults baby so she's in reno where mimi was raised and mimi i taught her told her about this clip and she said well it's always it's always been hot in reno in the summer it's like a new thing but okay here we go for your book

i know that you spoke to a lot of young people about growing up in areas with she has a book that's why she's on with heavy pollution well what did they tell you what are the sorts of things they told you um you know in in our town it causes a lot of um distress uh and mental health problems because we've been encased in smoke sometimes for eight to ten weeks at a time in 2021 there were two huge wildfires nearby and as the weeks wore on you know it's very hard

on everyone's mental health but a lot of kids i think adolescents i'm talking about primarily feel kind of betrayed that nothing has been done about this problem to to help ensure a better future for them epa director lee zeldin when he announced this proposal said that the finding twisted the law ignored precedent and warped science to achieve their preferred ends what do you say to that i i think that's exactly the opposite of the truth i mean i think that the statement they released

by um the five scientists are kind of known for being contrarians on this topic that they that that if they reverse it it is disregarding the science uh jeopardizing public health direct contradiction to their mandate to protect public health under the clean clean air act doctor you practice in reno nevada which is uh by some accounts the fastest warming city in the united states you know what they don't how can one place be fastest warm if they if you have global warming it's the

word what is the word global mean to you um means around the world so how is one place the fastest warming and we have we heard this over the years we've done this during the no agenda era we've heard alaska's fastest warming this place is the fastest warming one place or another times many times yes many many times and it's never made sense you can play the last of it what do you see in your practice and the patients you see yeah so when we get engulfed in smoke it's called

a smoke wave that'll come over because we're 10 miles from the california border so when the big california we get we're downwind immediately down land and we really get hit by it and the clinic and the hospital will fill with kids wheezing and coughing you know we've had kids the pediatric ward will fill up with kids on oxygen during heat waves which often go with uh you know we usually have a heat wave before the smoke hits because the the heat will trigger the

fire to start we often see kids fainting and athletic practices uh you know there's been studies showing that pediatric er visits go up 17 percent when in hot weather and and smoke waves also increase asthma visits by up to 78 according to one study of the campfire in 2018 so these uh these events have a huge impact on children's immediate health and because they affect development like i mentioned they can have a lifelong impact as well dr deborah hendrickson of the university nevada medical

school thank you very much thank you for wasting our time with your nonsense boy oh boy well that's really uplifting john thanks that's welcome you had nothing like a little climate change at the end of the show won't somebody please think of the children due to climate change i'm gonna show my support by donating to no agenda imagine all the people who could do that oh yeah that'd be fun we still do have an official john c dvorak tip of the day we've got a couple end of show mixes we do

have a meetup report and a few meetups quite a few meetups that we need to promote and right now john's going to take just a moment to thank the rest of our supporters $50 and above and we go back to austin texas with mr uh good cock in uh oh i'm sorry good book uh 105 35 jason marr in vancouver washington 100 tim freeman in placerville california 84 38 kind of where uh brunetti lives oh really he's a de-douching okay you've been de -douched all right there he is kevin mclaughlin

8008 uh boobs donation he's the archduke of luna lover america lover of melons and he says god bless america yes he somehow associates that with boobs david kekta san tan valley arizona 73 73 and he 73s that's our ham donation we also have a ham donation from but wait he says jeremy mack is a douchebag jeremy mack is a douchebag thunder thunder leg thunder leg in western australia uh 73 73s then 73s i don't know if they said that means anything in australia yeah

or they got momentum finance momentum finance llc parts unknown 72 72 it's finance momentum finance momentum finance dame becky in arlington washington hey dame becky 6996 dame nancy in san bruno 57 21 um the ne5532 op amp was designed by cygnetics in 1973 ah that's i said national arian the youngster and brought cheap low noise and low distortion small digital audio amplification to the masses yes 55 32 is her donation i think uh that's his it's arian i think it's him oh arian oh

arian okay well yeah well i think the 50 53 32 was powering clean feed i don't think that i don't think so either i don't think they make that anymore i don't think so either in fact cygnetics but even probably probably gone uh christopher depth uh no relation to johnny georgetown kentucky 52 72 he's got a birthday chris lewinsky in sherwood park alberta 50 now these are the 50s already and there's only four of them uh easy landscapes easy landscapes in north stonington connecticut

philip baloo in louisville kentucky and last on our very incredibly short list for some unknown reason this list is short short and we're done because chris cowan and another austonian that's very interesting austin texas texas is well represented in today's show texas is keeping the show afloat texas is keeping the show afloat face it where's the california people that's right thank you very much to these producers we do not mention anything under 50 for reasons of

anonymity but we do appreciate you and for those who regularly support the show with a recurring donation you can do that at noagenda donations.com any amount any frequency it's up to you whatever value you get out of the show send it back to us to keep the show going noagenda donations.com only two birthdays that we have on the list today christopher says happy birthday to casey depp who turned 50 on the 15th and sir william of pence west pennsylvania says happy birthday

to dc girl a dc girl and she'll be celebrating tomorrow happy birthday to these two from everybody here at the best podcast in the universe we do have one night which is always nice to see so we'll grab our blades here to do a little bit of a nighting um here we go oh oh i was waiting for you edward jennings come on up the podium sir you are about to become a knight of the knowage in the round table thanks to your support of the show as you calculated yourself and

we believe you it's all in the honor system one thousand dollars or more i'm very proud to pronounce sir eddie jay from west haven connecticut for you we've got hookers and blow rent boys and chardonnay a large special from two parties a pizza and a waco dr pepper doesn't get any better than that also on deck for you sir we have beer and blunts ruben s women and rose gates and sake baka vanilla bong and suburban sparkling cider escorts ginger ale and gerbils breast

milk and and as always the mutton and the meat now you have one final step to complete by going to no agenda rings

.com anybody can take a look at that site and you see the beautiful signet ring that we have for the dames and for the knights of the no agenda round table it is a signet ring so that means that you also receive a couple of sticks of wax you can use those to seal your important correspondence we love getting our little uh dame and knight uh notes in the mail sealed with your wax it's very cool and always it comes with a certificate of authenticity so in question in case anyone questions

it but it looks good at the meetups people do love seeing those knight and dame rings we missed the donation note on the previous episode i don't know how that happened this is from uh war and teas that sir darius unity knight of the sandhill people he said none of my note below was mentioned last episode regrettably prayerfully something here can be useful to or for get my nation please and thank you very kindly for the thoughtful consideration he's a darius sir darius unity

knight of the sandhill people he is a a knight to the no agenda round table and he uh he put out a book of pictures that he took in uh in the sand in the desert uh and uh he says break for this night please war and teas.com he also has some w -a-r-n-t-s-t-e-e -s.com and uh he says stay blessed free and dangerous yes indeed thank you brother we have any of the meetups continue you can find them all at no agenda meetups

.com and we do have a report for the fort wayne dad gum august meetup adam and john this is shannon and fort wayne we had a pretty good turnout uh i had the special salad of the day and i got a secretary general award yeah i'm not that special this is jared from cool hacks love your show shelly from fort wayne thank you for your courage michelle from fort wayne michael from wabash indiana in the morning john and adams for pbr street gang just enjoying the typical summer sweat out here in

northern indiana dame trinity having a great time in fort wayne as always thank you for your courage hey and our server didn't want to give us a report because she thinks we're all uh like cult members and uh by the way john safety tip i have my 33 bitcoin saved on a five and a quarter inch floppy it's secure there you go in the morning well at least you tried to get your server into the report i appreciate that maybe it'll fare better for the local 360 meetup which takes place um

no it took place today geez it's already over it was 11 a.m in blaine washington 277 g street hope it went well on thursday this coming thursday it's charlotte's thirsty third thursday meetup seven o'clock at ed's tavern in charlotte north carolina uh friday the 22nd maastricht the netherlands ah mr everett bopp himself the um uh our uh oh gosh what was the name of the disaster tech guy who was here uh in um in curveville who was helping with his disaster tech

labs um outfit where they bring wesh mesh wi-fi networks to disaster areas and leave them for the citizens to continue to use thank you everett uh still to come in this month of august mckinney texas on the 23rd cleveland ohio the 23rd los angeles california leo bravo on the 30th and medford lakes new jersey on the 31st no agenda meetup this is where you find your first responders in a true emergency connection is protection go find your group your tribe near you no

agenda meetups.com if you can't find one near you start one yourself it's easy and always a party you wanna be with everybody is like a party everybody okay at this point in the show we like to determine what we'll play at the very very end the last snippet the last snippet of the show known as the end of show iso i have two i will go first okay no too screamy this this next one may be useful oh you guys are terrific that's all i got it's accurate if it's it's of course it's very

accurate okay i've got two uh i have um only fans wow i'd pay to see these two on only fans okay that's a blind lady obviously yeah yeah yeah that's good yeah yeah yeah i'm glad you can do it the timing was good sometimes i nail it sometimes it's always a stunner i still got it yeah uh i don't know about that yeah uh and then we have the other one what a golden dahnab persnickety podcast yeehaw it's so stupid i want to use it hey everybody it's time for john c demorak's tip of the day so

uh everybody not everybody but a lot of people especially when you get older you have to deal with your your loss of grip grip so you get up one of those balls you know your ball squeeze squeeze a ball do you squeeze a ball i i usually have a squeeze ball around somewhere for your grip yeah it's always good you know you want to have a hell you want to have a a strong handshake yes you do especially meetups and beat ups yeah but the but these balls are boring there's a

ball there it is thank you balls are boring balls are boring uh you want everybody out there who should probably have a digital a digital it's called a digital hand grip ball and the reason what it is you charge it up it's got a usb port on it and you charge it up and as when you squeeze it it gives you the pounds it has a digital display that gives you the pounds of pressure so you can actually compete with yourself so you're squeezing the ball and you go oh can i

get to 40 you know and you just squeeze the ball and then you and you try to squeeze harder and instead of just squeezing some random ball you know like you know squeeze squeeze squeeze like people do uh you get the digital ball and you can squeeze it and you get your uh you get a number and you can compete with yourself and it actually improves your grip well that's a pretty good tip i thought so what's the name of this product again it's just it doesn't really have a brand name

it's just called if you look it up as a digital hand grip ball digital hand grip ball that will be on tipoftheday.net and noagendafund.com that is an outstanding john c devorak tip of the day goodbyes from you and me and sometimes at all created by dana brunetti one of the trolls said uh hey if donations are down you should just monetize the tip of the day man yeah okay that'll do it that'll save the show so please consider supporting us by going to noagendadonations.com coming up next i think

this may be live uh abs in a six-pack uh that's sir seat sitter and dean reiner i think that may be a live show so stay tuned for it of course if you're in the troll room you're going to enjoy all of that and end of show makes us from steph jaconson jaconson and danny loose returns to the end of show mixer pool we appreciate that and of course we will return on thursday for another episode of your media deconstruction no doubt plenty to talk about as we find out what's

next in the saga of russia ukraine the eu nato and the united states coming to you from the heart of the texas hill country where uh it's just beautiful this time of year nice and cool weather autumn is here in the morning everybody i'm adam curry yeah from northern silicon valley we're still waiting for summer i'm john c dvorak see you on thursday remember us noagendadonations.com until then adios mofos and such so we respect the solemnity the territorial integrity right

we as america are saying that's wrong and we will stand with ukraine in saying that that is wrong we know that what russia is doing is wrong there needs to be severe consequence you'll hear on the news their bad behavior you'll hear on the news their bad behavior that's what the issue is their bad behavior you'll hear on the news their bad behavior that's what the issue is essentially so they gave me 30 days notice so that i could keep working which i really

appreciated because i needed the income those packets sweet pea veggies and the best fresh catfish that shopper could get brought you into that best ground beef in town just so that i could keep working just a bit smaller now jimmy wright is not talking about his own store closing customers will still come for that good beef summer berries still please don't i'm sorry please i'm just desperate to find this brought you into that best ground beef in town best fresh catfish that show it

just feels we should get some warning away 20 minute drive because some of us depend on it do you want veggies and the best fresh catfish that shopper diane jameson yeah brought you into that best ground beef in town 20 minute drive now jimmy wright is not talking about his own store what a golden dahnab persnickety podcast yeehaw