Surface – Lean on Me: Finding Inspiration to Lead from Experts, Colleagues and Within – Part 2 - podcast episode cover

Surface – Lean on Me: Finding Inspiration to Lead from Experts, Colleagues and Within – Part 2

Aug 10, 202329 minSeason 3Ep. 21
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

In part two of this two-part episode of the NLN Nursing EDge Unscripted Surface track, Sabrina Beroz and Michelle Moulton continue their discussion of key themes from the 2023 NLN Leadership Institute retreat. They delve into strategic planning and thinking, emphasizing the importance of team collaboration, psychological safety, and the differentiation between strategic planning and strategic thinking. The conversation also explores the role of neuroscience in leadership, particularly how emotions and the amygdala influence decision-making and team dynamics. Advocacy is highlighted as a crucial leadership skill, especially in understanding and navigating budget systems to secure resources and support for nursing programs. The episode concludes with reflections on the importance of financial acumen for leaders and recommendations for leadership resources and books.

Dedicated to excellence in nursing, the National League for Nursing is the leading organization for nurse faculty and leaders in nursing education. Find past episodes of the NLN Nursing EDge podcast online. Get instant updates by following the NLN on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, Bluesky, and YouTube. For more information, visit NLN.org.

Transcript

[Music]

Welcome back. Last episode we talked  with Dr. Sabrina Beroz and explored   a few key themes from the 2023  NLN Leadership Institute retreat.   The key themes were provided by expert leaders  that inspired nurse educators to lean into   their leadership roles even when, and especially  when, things get tough. Thank you for joining us. Now would be a good time to transition  to our third theme. which was strategy.   We got to hear from Dr. Joan Evans. She is an 

executive coach and consultant. Dr. Evans came   to speak to us about strategic planning  and also a little bit of Neuroscience   neuroscience in the context of leadership,  which I thought was interesting because Dr.  Rachel Onello and I, who also co-hosts, right,  who's often a part of these conversations,   her and I often talk about neuroscience in the 

context of teaching and learning. But it was   really interesting to hear about neuroscience in  the context of leadership so that was pretty cool. You know, I think you often think about as a leader  you can hold a lot of responsibility in moving a   team or an organization toward a goal and you can  get very driven toward that, but I think there's a   lot to be said for reflecting on, well, what is the  goal? And why is that the goal? And how will we know  

we got to the goal? And how will we know we didn't  get to the goal? I think there's a lot of   skill development for a leader around  strategic planning and determining really being   very thoughtful and reflective about goal setting  and getting really strategic about it.   I think that she just shared a lot of insight  around that. So what what were some of your   thoughts Sabrina? So she actually differentiated 

a couple of things. She differentiated strategic   planning from strategic thinking and I thought  that was really interesting because I think   sometimes you say, okay, strategic planning very  detailed, I have to get my spreadsheet out, I have   to put down it has to meet the vision and mission  of the organization and these are the goals and   how am I going to meet my goals. Then you  have your tracking and and who's going to help   me meet these goals and you often think about 

am I developing this in isolation? And we're not   developing it in isolation. That's where that whole  strategic thinking piece comes in where you have a   team. You have a team who's going to work  with you on how to do this planning but you've   got a whole team that's going to do that thinking  piece and able to I like to think about teams  

in two ways. One - and we did did talk about this a  little bit at the retreat - but how you need to have   some psychological safety within that team so that  you hear all the voices of all the individuals who   are helping you with your strategic plan.  So that strategic thinking piece is your  

team who's working to do that. Then the other  side of course would be accountability, where the   accountability piece is you need to get this done,  but there's two it you know that you want to be   able to hear and that's kind of the ultimate.  Amy Edmondson talks about this in her work   and and we'll talk about different books.  I think towards the end but she talks about   teaming and how important it is today with  learning organizations, which is what we all work  

in nursing education. In order to do the  strategic planning you need a team who can hear   all perspectives yet know there is a goal to meet  at the end of the goal. I think I walked away   with that. I value teams. I started a  consortium in the state of Maryland with a group,   with a team. I couldn't do it by myself because  I needed expertise besides myself in this team.  

They were selected for their strengths and  their expertise and we worked towards it and  we worked as a great team we had that goal at the  end. I like to say, Dr. Sue Forneris always says   that it's important to begin with the end in mind,  which is what we did. We said the whole big goal   was this and that there was a team that we worked  together and valued our strengths as a group.  

Dr. Evans also talked about strategic planning  and thinking as an art and a science so it's not   just this this detailed pen to paper plan that  you're going to put together that there is that   other art side of hearing everybody's perspective  to make it very best that it can be so that's what   I took away as far as strategy from  what she brought to us at the retreat. 

Yeah, you know I keep thinking about it keeps  coming up over and over again is that when you   have a team really getting strategic about looking  at the different strengths that everyone brings   because that diversity and strengths and  that diversity in thinking and the diversity   in problem solving can, I think, if you can leverage  all the pieces in a very productive, meaningful way I think it just drives every  like everyone cohesively toward that goal.  

Amy Edmondson talks also, teams,  you know, like that's a solid team,   has a framework around it. But she also talks  about a concept of teaming, which we do a lot   more now in our learning environments because  we with ad hoc committees. We come to together   quickly. We have a defined goal. You may or  may not know those people who come together,   but you have to quickly get up to speed on  everybody in the team who has what to   give to the team, what their strengths are. 

Then you meet your goal and then you   go off and then you have another committee  where maybe completely different people that   you're working with. Our environments  are different today when we think about   strategic planning and these teaming and and even  strategic thinking which is what we do in teams. I know she also talked about and I'll let  you because you are really a neuroscience person   so I'll let you talk a little bit about  that, but she talked about the amygdala.  

So I'm going to let you take off  on that a little bit. You know, when we think about   the neuroscience and leadership around how our  emotions and how they show up in our everyday   life because we're a superhuman so we also have  like super emotions, but I think as humans we   like to kind of like dismiss them or ignore them  but they show up all the time in our daily work   and how to kind of regulate our emotions and when  to be vulnerable vulnerable about our emotions and  

when to share our emotions. I think in a team and  as a leader is can be really important because   I think that shows coming back to our initial  earlier conversation - it shows connection. When   people in our teams as leaders can see  some connection and feel some shared experience,   which is often driven by emotions, I think that 

can be really helpful. I think for a leader   it's about being able to flip neuro from the  neuroscience of being able to flip back and forth   between our amygdala very intentionally to our  cognitive prefrontal cortex and I think that takes   practice. Then to connect that  also to psychological safety and Amy Edmonson's    work again. You know, to be psychologically safe,  that safety comes, generates pretty much from our   amygdala. I'll give an example Sabrina. 

I hope you don't mind. I'm going to put us out   there a little bit but you and I participated  in a VR experience where you're walking the blank.   Right, that's a perfect example. Sabrina and I  had this opportunity to go into a VR headset and   it's called Richie's plank experience. There's  a piece of wood on the ground in a very safe  

environment. Then you put the VR headset on  and you go up an elevator and the elevator opens   and there you are on the top of you know the 80th  floor of the Empire State Building or something.   You are tasked to walk the plank out into the  open air of the the outside of the building.  

Even though cognitively you know  that you are safe and that you can   walk this plank because you were actually  on the ground and you are not outside of   a building and you are not going to fall,  our amygdala, it's called amygdala hijack,   completely takes over and our prefrontal  cortex is no longer online and I'm saying our,   I'll just speak for myself, I got one step out  onto the plank and I was like no I can't do it   but I could cognitively I know I could do it. 

But my amygdala the sweating and my heart rate   completely took over and it disabled me completely,  disabled me from going out onto this plank and   completing the task at hand right. Right.   So it was funny when I was in the VR headset.   I kept flip-flopping back and forth saying, "I'm  on the floor. Take a few more steps. I'm on the  

floor. Take a few more steps." And I got almost to  the end of the plank in VR which opens up where   you would just step off and then you would go down  and I don't know what that experience is because   I didn't make it that far because I came across  and then I actually changed foot positions and   then to the safest way I could to get back to the 

elevator. So yes, that is a prime example   and what's interesting is that you know  often Dr. Evans was saying that your amygdala   is not always accurate and that's a perfect  example because that was not accurate because   I really was not on the top of the 80th floor  of that building but it made me feel like I was.   I think she was saying that  your amygdala actually doesn't really shut   off because it can continue on to heighten you. 

As you are in more of a stressful environment   you may be controlled by your amygdala and that  your frontal cortex is what really helps to make   sense of what's happening, but that doesn't,  that tires so I I think it's important that   even that work-life balance or maybe throwing back a little bit to that saying   positively you know, "I get to," kind of helps to  just balance that off for you a little bit.  

It's interesting to see how all these concepts  actually are tying back to our experience with   the retreat. Absolutely. So I think it's a good  time to move on to our fourth and final theme,   which was advocacy. The speaker was Mr.  Michael Newsom, who is a senior associate vice   president for finance and operations for Virginia 

Commonwealth University. He came to talk to the   group about budget systems in higher education  and the disclaimer I want to make is that   when I see the word budget and  finance I'm like yikes like I don't know how  

I don't know how to do that. It has numbers  and math and I just shy away from it because   those are not my strength but I tied this topic  to the word advocacy because I think as leaders   we often have to advocate for one of the most  I think common things to advocate for is money:   compensation, resources, or funding for programs, time, right, and those things are   often tied together, or professional development,  which also has a cost to it so much of  

what we do to move an organization or a team or a  program forward I think it's tied to the resources   to make that happen and as a leader the only way  that that can those we can obtain resources is to   advocate. That's my kind of bias I think  in order to understand financial or   maybe this is how I make it palatable. This is how  I can put any emphasis on understanding   numbers is that I can't advocate for a team  or a program if I don't understand the numbers.  

So you know I was looking at advocacy and the concept as well   and thinking about how important it is that we  have some sort of financial acumen as leaders   because I think it is important for us to  understand both sides that the person you are   approaching with a budget item that you want them  to give you some money for whatever resource it   is that you want you have to realize that there's 

another side. They have to also advocate for   others who are asking probably for things as well  so I think when you go into your administrator and   you're asking for something. You have to have what  I call what is your return on investment.   What is it that you, what metrics would you  need going in to say this is why we need to have  

this. Maybe because we've increased the enrollment  in our Institution for nursing students that   because you've done that you need more simulators  or you need more VR time or whatever it is that   you have to put together the numbers on why you  need that and how that's going to improve your...   your student outcomes, your  program outcomes. Go in with  

that in mind. I think that's important. I  worked with a person who was a businessman and   he used to use this phrase and he would say, "Well  Sabrina, is the juice worth the squeeze?" Meaning   you know, if I'm going to give you this money, is it  really worth it? I need to know why and   I need to know also is it sustainable? Is it just 

a one-time shot? Whatever   you've purchased is is not going to be sustainable  because they want it sustainable so that's another   thing you want to think about when you're going 

in asking for something. I think sometimes   particularly in nurses education we don't get a  lot of accounting and that information that   background in order to be comfortable with with  numbers you know because we, I mean we use numbers   and medication administration but we don't  often think unless you're in a managerial role   and manage a budget we don't think about that a  whole lot particularly at patient care even at the   educator role you know unless there's something 

we really want to purchase. The other piece   that I think is also something called return on  expectations and so that's really your educational,   you've done an educational program or you want  to develop a program and you have to explain why   that's important and what kind of evaluation  because it's really not going to be marked  

by increasing enrollment per se. It's going to be  more like if you think about Kirkpatrick's levels   of evaluation and how is that going to change  behavior in the end and he results of what   you've taught. You can go out to  NCLEX scores I guess sometimes that's a little bit   difficult but you might need to go out that far  if you were asking for a pretty large expenditure.  

I think advocating knowing  that advocating for your program includes   expenditures that we need to as nurses become  comfortable and as leaders comfortable with that.  

I think what's hard sometimes is that is that for good reason but it seems that there's  like a person or a small group of people that   have the budget in all of its detail and all of  its glory and there's a little bit of a curtain   right there's like a little bit of a wall between  maybe that budget and that knowledge and you and maybe you as a leader on the other side  that needs to advocate for a program for

a division or for some work. How do we like that's  what I'd love to talk to Mr. Newsome some more   about, how it is that you align...how  do you create your pitch and structure your pitch   and advocacy for funds if you don't always know  what's behind the curtain? it like feels like it's   a little bit of you're kind of shooting in the  dark a little bit and I think that's challenging.  

I think that takes some savvy and  some mentorship and some practice perhaps   to know how do you anticipate what the  the leaders that are holding the budget... what's important to them? And  how do they want to allocate these funds?   And who else is is coming and  asking? Who else is coming in?   So I think that goes back to just trying to  prove that you really need this  

and that what are your measures, what is that return on investment? How is it   going to be sustainable within the organization  and what will it do to improve program outcomes because we're talking about nursing education.  I think the other thing I heard you say the cost   of time and and that's really hard to measure and  I think we go and try and advocate for time in for  

example simulation. We want faculty  to be able to have time to do simulation but how   in the structure of workload that's time  right and all of time does end up going   to budget because you have to look at am I are  you going to pay me for my time in simulation. A   lot of these go back to budget and budget  items and workload and your   teaching at the same time as you're doing 

simulation. I think it's important to   consider first return on course  expectations but you may need that right as   well as the return on investment. I remember  a specific example when I realized that time and and budget were sort of connected.  I was a faculty course coordinator teaching   a very large course. The course existed with  the faculty and a teaching assistant that helped  

to support the work of the course. When  I moved into the course to be the faculty and   the course coordinator the teaching assistant  disappeared and I remember saying, wait a minute? Where'd they go? It wasn't like they just 

went out to lunch. It was that there was an   administrative decision to remove that resource  for budgeting purposes from the course and   I remember feeling like, but wait a minute, that  means for me to do the work that they were doing   it's going to take me more time and that means  my time and attention from something else has  

to shift to now do this work. It  really it came down to budgeting and in the end   I had to understand it and I did you know you  just okay and move on and just reallocate   your time and attention in a different way,   which can be challenging though sometimes when   resources are removed or you're trying  to advocate for resources to be added

I think it's hard. I think how to define, like  you're saying, how to define the cost or the the   return on investment for that time because  that time maybe for me could have been more spent   on scholarship or on grant writing or on it you  know who knows but you have to advocate for that   and that's hard. I think that's just hard to do.  You brought up grant funding   and you have with grant funding you

have an evaluation plan. You have a plan of   evaluation that is created to show your return on  investment for that funder so that they know that   if I fund this and I give this money this is so  we have to think about when we go to advocate for   something within an institution it's almost like  grant funding. This is what is needed within   the program and this is the plan of evaluation  so that you know I'm going to evaluate what that   return is on the money that you've given me or 

the resources you've given me. It's really   the same concept and I guess if we think about  it from that perspective because as faculty we   write grants all the time. You have to have  that plan of evaluation. Think about   that even for budgeting. Thanks for mentioning  that because I think that it aligns nicely.   I think this would be a good time to  summarize we talked about. The four themes, which   was creativity, connection, strategy, and advocacy. 

In summary, Sabrina and I just wanted to spend   some time sharing our reflections from being in  the presence of great speakers and great leaders   that were sharing their time and expertise with us  in the NLN Institute for Leadership Program. Our hope is that you can take some pieces of  of these nuggets that we have internalized , take them with you. We hope to do a deeper  dive into some of these topics in future weeks  

I think that's it. I think  we can wrap up Sabrina by   talking about some of our favorites where we go  turn for some leadership support and inspiration,   some maybe favorite resources, books, or podcasts.  Do you have any that you'd like to share?    I have a couple. I've already  alluded to some, but one that I thought was really   interesting it's called The Leader Phrase Book. 

This was given to me by one of my mentors that   when I was on the board I was always thinking how  do I phrase things well so that when I   speak up that people will hear what I'm saying.  Maybe they're not going to agree with what I say,   but how do I say it in a way that sounds like I'm  a leader and I have something to contribute.  

So it actually was a book called The Leader Phrase  Book and so it's written by Patrick Alain and it   just talks about how you phrase things how if you  phrase things wrong it gives you an example of how   to phrase it wrong and it gives you graduates and  and actually it's a great book so I recommend that   if you find yourself in a position where you want  to know how to how to state something in a   way or it's intended the way in which your your 

thoughts were what your intentions were for it.   My other book, which I love, is Thanks for the  Feedback. The authors are Daniel Stone and Sheila   Heen. They are really social behaviorists and  they talk about three things. They talk about   the we, the see, and the me on how you see feedback.  It's a great book to read and it just gives you   those three perspectives on it's really how you  receive feedback. In nursing we talk a lot about   how we give feedback but this is more about how 

to receive it and how we're receiving it. That   amygdala - try and kind of tie that together. Tnd the  other book that I think is great is called Teaming   and it's by Amy Edmondson and I talked about that 

a little bit. It's about how organizations learn   innovate and compete in a knowledge economy and so  we're in a knowledge economy in nursing education   but today we're in knowledge economies because  we're developing AI and different knowledge   aspects so that's another great book that that I  recommend by Amy Edmondson. How about you, Michelle?   Well at first I just want to say I love all 

of those resources! I do not know about the leader   phrases though I'm gonna have to go get on Amazon  and pick that one up. So I do enjoy Brene Brown's   books on leadership. I think Dare to Lead is  one of them. I listen to her books because I I   enjoy kind of getting it from directly from the  author's perspective so I listen to a lot of books.  

I'll connect that to some of the  podcasts I most recently have been digging   into and I've been going several seasons back  to go listen to the beginning is Adam Grant,   Simon Sinek, and Brene Brown. They each have their  own podcast and what's fun about the three of   those podcasters and authors is that they  have very different perspectives but they   hearing them in conversation together is  inspirational especially when they're talking   about a lot of human psychology organizational 

behavior. They all will visit each other's   podcasts so you can get all three of them on  several different types of conversation so I've   been digging back and listening to their archives  of podcast episodes so that's what and again it's   not always on leadership but it's definitely  there's definitely huge leadership themes but it's   a lot on human connection, vulnerability, mentorship.  I think the themes that are talked about always  

get connected to leadership. That's nice. That's nice. All right well thank you so much Sabrina for   joining me in this conversation to reflect  on the the takeaways and ahas that came out of the   the Leadership Institute Retreat that we  had. I'm just grateful for your contributions   Yeah thank you. This is my first podcast so  I put myself out there! Congratulations! So thank you for inviting me. This was a lot of  fun. I really enjoyed it. Wonderful. Thanks so much.

Thank you for joining us on this episode  of NLN Nursing EDge Unscripted Surface. We   hope you join us next time. Until then,  remember, whether your water is calm or   choppy, stay connected, get vulnerable,  and dare to go beneath the surface.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android