Surface – Celebrating the Year of the Nurse Educator: The Evolution of Nursing Education and Its Impact on Curricula - podcast episode cover

Surface – Celebrating the Year of the Nurse Educator: The Evolution of Nursing Education and Its Impact on Curricula

Sep 29, 202226 minSeason 2Ep. 36
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

This episode of the NLN Nursing EDge Unscripted Surface track features guest Sue Forneris. The discussion explores the evolution of nursing education and its impact on curriculum design, emphasizing the need for educators to adapt their teaching strategies to match current healthcare complexities. Dr. Forneris highlights the importance of integrating emerging technologies and innovative pedagogical approaches, such as the Educause Horizon Report and the NCSBN Clinical Judgment Measurement Model, into nursing curricula. The conversation underscores the shift from traditional knowledge transmission to facilitating critical thinking and clinical judgment among nursing students. The episode calls for nurse educators to reflect on these changes and engage in dialogue to enhance curriculum and teaching practices.

Dedicated to excellence in nursing, the National League for Nursing is the leading organization for nurse faculty and leaders in nursing education. Find past episodes of the NLN Nursing EDge podcast online. Get instant updates by following the NLN on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, Bluesky, and YouTube. For more information, visit NLN.org.

Transcript

Welcome to this episode of the NLN podcast  Nursing Edge Unscripted the Surface track   and thank you for joining us this episode  is entitled celebrating the year of the   nurse educator the evolution of Nursing  education and its impact on curricula   where we discuss how nursing education's Evolution  during recent years impacts curriculum integration   and design we will discuss two key influencing  factors The educause Horizon report and the  

ncspn's clinical judgment measurement model please  join Dr Susan feneres and I as we discuss why   these resources are important considerations  when designing and integrating curricula and   consider how the resources can challenge our  teaching strategies to match the evolution   I would like to formally introduce my co-host  for today Dr Susan gross veneres Dr Paneras is   the director for the national league for nursing  division for Innovation and education excellence  

Sue is instrumental in the design  and implementation of nln Faculty   development resources focused on the pedagogy  of teaching and learning her expertise is in   curriculum and teaching learning strategies  with an emphasis in simulation and debriefing   her research and publication focus on the  development and use of reflective teaching   strategies to enhance critical thinking she  co-authored the publication critical conversation   the nln guide for teaching thinking and most 

recently critical conversations from monologue   to dialogue Sue is an admired mentor of mine  and to many others so let's Jump Right In thanks   Michelle for taking time um to have a conversation  with me about this notion of journeying through   nursing education I'd like to spend the next 10  minutes really trying to set the stage for how we   see Nursing education our roles as Educators  and maybe some of the reframing that may need   to happen in order for us to meet Learners where 

they're at so I appreciate you taking a little bit   of a deeper dive with me here that sounds good  Sue and you know I think this is important I'm   hoping our conversation can help nurse Educators  understand a little bit more about what needs to   get pulled into curriculum design what things  we need to consider what challenges might we   need to overcome to help us create a thoughtful  mindful curriculum for our our Learners absolutely   so sue I'd like to invite you to share um your 

perspective on some pedagogical assumptions and   to do so I'd like to do a little time travel  if you can take us back to help us understand   some of the historical contexts around Nursing  education and nursing practice and then we'll   we'll do a little comparison to what was and what  is now yeah as we think about that absolutely time   travel uh for sure because I am not a new educator  and so as you think about this journeying through   nursing education we really do have to use our 

past to help inform us as we think about the now   and into the future and so um maybe the way to  look at it in this time capsule is to consider   both practice and education so if we were to  think of ourselves as uh nurses who maybe began   practice over 40 years ago now perhaps Michelle  you weren't born then um 40 years ago but some   of us were entering practice 40 years ago and  um and back then you know as we think about   um that practice environment when we were Learners 

in nursing um you know faculty accompanying us to   clinical um it was a situation where we may  have seen a faculty student ratio of one to   ten uh students in the clinical environment most  of the time we were assigned post-op patients to   learn kind of that post-op piece or um perhaps  we were in nursing homes caring for the Aging   but um back then we maybe were assigned to  patients probably not as much we still stayed with   that one patient model and uh you know spent eight 

hours and we did all of the patient care we were   taught to be in practice to um to meet the needs  of the patient um all of the needs of the patient   um in addition to the usual nursing interventions  that you were being taught in the classroom some   of the assumptions underlying that form of  teaching pedagogically was that it was this   notion of applying Theory so you learned you  got your theory dump in class and then you would   go to practice and just by the process of doing 

you'd merge the theory and apply it in practice   that's generally what it was there seemed to be  a preponderance of focus on psychomotor skills   so you were in clinical to practice psychomotor  skills because it was not likely that you got a   chance to do that in the real world and that you'd  build on past knowledge it was always building on   past knowledge moving from simple to complex and  your instructor would be guiding that whole piece   um and and that's kind of what um what 

we're seeing um what we saw 40 years ago   that's that's really helpful to understand  that perspective and I'd like to take a   little time to compare that now to what  we're seeing now both in practice and   nursing education and I think by having this  conversation it might help us to understand   you know what's brought us to today and what we  need to do as Educators how we might need to shift   um our thinking and our approach to curriculum  so if you can share now what what's happening  

today well today you know it's interesting the  pedagogical assumptions really haven't changed   much um you know we still believe that we're using  clinical as our way to apply the theory that we're   teaching in our didactic so again we go to class  there's this knowledge dump and then we expect   them to use that information in clinical um again  there is still this emphasis on psychomotor skills   um and probably more so even now as people use 

the word competency because you immediately go   to psychomotor skills when there really seems  to be this push to develop clinical reasoning   clinical judgment that that whole piece we're  still using this this assumption that we are   building on simple to complex using your past  knowledge keep adding to it and then as you go   to clinical you keep informing um you know your  own learning as a as a student in in nursing   um in terms of what practice we might see on 

the practice side with teaching is we're we're   probably seeing maybe a one to ten or possibly one  to eight ratio uh trying to account for a little   bit of complexity in the patient population but  not much if 40 years ago we were still at one to   ten um you know we're we're taking care of medical  surgical patients we may get assigned more than   one patient nowadays because that seems to be a  little bit of an emphasis but definitely not the  

status quo and we spend maybe eight to ten hours  on a clinical shift in the instructors in charge   of of doing everything what's interesting about  this is that you know it hasn't changed we're   40 years ago we're still using those same  assumptions to guide how we prepare Learners   in real life in a clinical experience except  for the patient population and the health care   industry has changed dramatically in the last 40  years I always make the analogy that when I was  

in post coronary or ICU 40 years ago those  patients exist today on General Med search   floors we're going to see nurses encounter vent  patients and and very critically ill that were   once in icus now and they stepped down in in some  of the main mainstreaming of these patients into   the the general med-surg population and into the  community and and patients that today are in ICU   they they weren't alive 40 years ago there wasn't  the Science and Technology uh advances so where we  

seem to be at a little bit of a disadvantage with  our our Learners in that we're trying to continue   to prepare them pedagogically for patients that  existed 40 years ago and so we wonder why we   have a a difficult time saying our Learners are  prepared for today's you know client population   yeah I was just thinking you know with you  saying that that everything you just described   it really impacts and in influences the academic  practice Gap that we're seeing there are many  

other factors I think that have created that  that um space or that uphill climb that that   our Learners our new graduates have to make  as they transition into practice successfully   and some don't some really struggle um and  and some need a lot of guidance so I think   this conversation is timely um to talk about  how we can get out of our own thinking shift our   thinking get out of our own way to making a shift  where we can really meaningfully try to narrow  

this academic practice Gap with some thoughtful  changes to our curriculum how we design our   curricula and then how that curricula at a program  level or an institution level than a program level   and then how it plays out in our classrooms and  how it actually is then consumed from a learning   perspective by our Learners so I think this is I  find this an exciting conversation and an exciting   time to be able to do this work absolutely as a 

nurse educator yeah maybe a little overwhelming   maybe a little bit but I think we can take small  chunks and move it forward you know small pieces   so I'd like to transition a little bit to talk  about some of the consideration that we need to   incorporate into our thinking our rethinking  reframing our thinking and curriculum design   what are some um now that we've talked about the  changing dynamics of education and practice what   are some of the resources or the the guidance that 

informs that that Dynamic um change what's telling   us as Educators that this is the direction we  might need to move if we can discuss some of   those those pieces yeah well I think two of them  are most prevalent is uh the Horizon report and   the other factor that is really informing Nursing  education is the new ncsbn clinical judgment model so let's talk a little bit about the Horizon  Project The Horizon Project was an initiative   by New Media Consortium where they would chart 

a lot of the emerging Technologies for teaching   and learning and it was launched back in 2002 um  and since that time they would publish a report   that would detail some of the trends happening  in the workforce around technology that would   definitely Drive what's happening in education  to prepare individuals to practice in those   technological environments since then taken over  by educause which is a non-profit Association of   the largest community I I would say of Technology 

academic industry campus leaders that are looking   to advance higher education and how they use I.T  in in the learning so in these reports they they   talk about these emerging Trends and probably  the most influential as you think about Trends   in education are some of the more contemporary  things so the use of artificial intelligence   or AI that informs learning analytics how do  we know our Learners are learning we've become   much more sophisticated over the course 

of the years to identify how Learners are   learning we've had to adapt our learning spaces  to account for both online and face-to-face so   lot of hybrid learning we've had to create tools  that Embrace AI especially in our entertainment   areas Learners are using AI every day in their  gaming on their phones and how do we Embrace that   and bring that into our learning environments and  so those are some of the the factors and so really   what it gets down to is what we call reframing 

the practice of teaching you know it's no longer   us as Educators transmitting knowledge which is  really kind of how we've always seen our role   focus is the transmission of knowledge but more  how do we facilitate knowledge with our Learners   and that requires us to rethink this practice  of teaching the information coming out and the   technology is really going to be driving that  and that is a report that helps us understand   where our consumers are our our Learners 

are and so that would be one driving force   that's great soon I love this idea of moving us  as nurse Educators as a community of practice   um from transmitter of knowledge to facilitator of  knowledge um that it's not just the information's   coming from my head and going to your head um  it's really about how we can help facilitate   this experience of learning from practicing  different skills using knowledge and applying   it to different contexts that we can do 

that with and for our Learners um yeah more being more intentional about our roles as  Educators and the Art and Science of teaching   becomes a front front stage that's great and you  know I think um the second thing that you had   mentioned which I I can uh jump in and talk about  absolutely is the clinical judgment measurement   model um that the ncsbn uh has designed to  really guide the item writing and Analysis   um the test blueprint for um the NCLEX next gen 

so um I'm going to show a screen here a slide that   has the model and I want to guide you to the left  side of the model has the layers layer zero layer   one two three and four and then along the bottom  you have the nursing process that really underpins   um this entire model uh that we've had you know  we've always used the nursing process to guide   what we do um and then I'm going to skip around  a little bit uh to orient you to the model so at   the top at layer uh one you have clinical 

judgment that's kind of the ultimate goal   right we want to use our judgment a clinical  decision-making process to inform a judgment   um to make a decision that informs  that informs our care for our patients   um how we communicate uh our interventions uh  and and how we can help meet our patients needs   I'm going to skip down to layer three so layer  three has a recognizing cues uh analyzing cues   prioritizing hypotheses generating solution taking 

action and then evaluating outcomes so this really   covers the cognitive processing that goes on under  the hood of a nurse to gather information make   meaning of it um and and to to consider different  options different situations and then come to a   solution come to a a decision but you can see I  want to jump back up to Layer Two where you can   see where this cognitive processing at a ride at  a at arriving at a decision is iterative it goes   back and forth you gather information you're 

like I need some more information uh you get   more information and then you you add that into  hopefully you add that into now your new analysis   so that's the cognitive piece and then the layer  four is um really the context in which you do   clinical judgment right it's it's this context in  which the thinking has to occur and there's two   buckets on layer four there's the environmental  piece and then the individual piece and this is   really important because the environmental 

piece is are the environmental context in   which we have to do this work it includes task  complexity time pressures interprofessional team   members it involves a lot of variables that  go into how and when we make decisions and   then we've got the individual factors that's us  right so how much uh prior knowledge do I have   how much experience can I draw from to make  this decision that may impact how quickly I   make a decision so you can see that the individual 

factors and the environmental factors certainly do   impact one another right but nonetheless this  entire layer four is the context in which we   are doing this clinical judgment so it's not a  matter of just simply taking information doing   some thinking and do doing the action you have  to do all of that quickly and independently   right depending on where you are in your  in transitioning into nursing practice so   but that being said I think this model is really 

helping us to well it's helping the ncsbn guide   what kind of items right the question items  they have new items now and these items are   doing a better job now at measuring this clinical  judgment clinical judgment's always been around in   nursing we've always wanted our nurses to learn  how to think critically right but now it's being   better measured so I'm going to show you another  slide here uh going to compare and contrast what   we are looking at and our the current or the old 

what will soon be the old uh NCLEX um test item   alignment how the items line up to the different  pieces of this clinical judgment measurement   and the environmental factors are along the  top and you can see there's a lot of yellow   or even a lot of red and there's very little green  the green indicates how well these current items   exam items are measuring these pieces of the  layer 3 and layer four which may have changed   a little bit with the new model but you kind 

of understand these pieces of clinical decision   making it really wasn't hitting the mark with so  much yellow and red with regard to measurement   uh and then if you go down to the next slide um  you'll see uh this is the comparing to the new   um NCLEX next-gen uh clinical judgment measurement  model and how it's integrating with the new items   and what you'll see is that these new items  are doing a much better job at measuring these   layer three and layer four on that model that we 

just went through um you'll see a lot more green   okay so this is the real takeaway Point here is  that as Educators in order to help our Learners   better perform and not protest but perform in  clinical practice the ability to take information   make assign some meaning Implement you know come  to a decision implement the decision with time   pressure with my my knowledge of anatomy and  physiology um and pharmacology right drawing   from my individual knowledge the ability to do 

all this is now going to be measured in a much   more rigorous way um so that really uh I think  inspires us as nurse Educators to change the way   we're teaching to create opportunities for more  practice absolutely um yeah and development in   this area yeah it forces us really Michelle to  begin with the end in mind and for once we have   something that it provides a little bit more of  the rationale for why you know when we think about   clinical judgment and measuring and it's not only 

measuring that but how do we help reinforce all   of the skills that come with that you talk about  analyzing information generating hypotheses you   know all of those pieces take practice and that  helps us to rethink our roles as Educators where   we want to give our Learners opportunities to do  that in the classroom in different places because   it's a skill they're going to have to practice  that's part of what it means to think like a   nurse teach one to to to think like a nurse if 

we're preparing and so you know all of these   these factors around us that drive us to rethink  the practice of teaching is part of how do we get   out of the way of our own thinking it's sort of  an unthinking process to realign to where are   we today and and how do we really truly begin  with the end in mind in our roles as educators   that's great soon I think the call to us as  Educators now um or at least for the context   of this conversation the invitation is for nurse 

Educators to reflect on these um considerations   that impact our curricula and our teaching down  at the um classroom and lab and clinical areas   um have conversations and dialogue with your  colleagues in your um your curriculum committees   uh and and with leadership um to help to make  these changes I think it's just that that would   be my invitation to people to reflect and to have  conversations about this good stuff absolutely thank you for joining us on this episode 

of nln nursing Edge on scripted surface   we hope you join us next time until then  remember whether your water is calm or   choppy stay connected get vulnerable  and dare to go beneath the surface

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android