Nurse Educator Competencies – Part 1 - podcast episode cover

Nurse Educator Competencies – Part 1

Jul 25, 202427 minSeason 4Ep. 1
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

This episode of NLN Nursing EDge Unscripted is part 1 of 2 featuring guests Jasline Moreno and Elizabeth Wells-Beede. Kellie Bryant, Director of the Center for Innovation in Education Excellence at the National League of Nursing, hosts the discussion about challenges faced by new nurse educators. The conversation emphasizes the need for professional development, support systems, and mentorship to help educators thrive and bridge the competency gap in nursing education.

Dedicated to excellence in nursing, the National League for Nursing is the leading organization for nurse faculty and leaders in nursing education. Find past episodes of the NLN Nursing EDge podcast online. Get instant updates by following the NLN on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, Bluesky, and YouTube. For more information, visit NLN.org.

Transcript

[Music]

[Music]

Hello I'd love to welcome everyone to our new  episode of the National League for Nursing's   podcast and I have the privilege of having two  simulation and faculty colleagues of mine joining   me for this podcast. My name is Kellie Bryant.  I am the director of the Center for Innovation   in Education Excellence at the National League  of Nursing. I'm here accompanied by one of my   simulation colleagues, Dr. Elizabeth Wells-Beede,  who is the senior associate dean at the University  

of North Texas Health Science Center. I also  have the pleasure of being here with Jasline   Moreno who is from Montgomery College and is the  faculty lead for the Maryland Clinical Simulation   Resource Consortium hosted at Montgomery College,  that is a mouthful. So I want to thank you both   for being here today to have this very important  discussion. Elizabeth, you wrote this amazing   scoping review along with some of your colleagues  on, "A Scoping Review of Nurse Educator Competencies:  

Mind the Gap." That's what we're here today to  talk about and I just wanted to start with you   know just a little bit of background and  letting our audience know a little bit about   us and how we got into nursing education. So I'll  start with Jasline and if you could just let us   know how did you get into nursing education and  how well did you feel prepared for that transition? Thank you so much Kellie for hosting this podcast and asking that excellent question.  

So I actually got into nursing education by  accident. I remember working a shift in the   ped's ER at Children's National Medical Center and  I think there was an agency nurse working next to   me that day and she was like, hey, why don't you try  clinical instructor over at the school? I was like,   really? And I was young and motivated  trying all kinds of different things and I said,   sure, sounds cool. So within a week I got hired  to be a clinical instructor for a peds unit at  

a local community hospital. Mind you, I had only  been at Children's in the peds wing for about six   months so not an expert in that area as well my  orientation to the clinical unit consisted about   an hour talking with a nurse who was on the unit  and I started my first clinical instructor day at   7 o'clock and had a group of eight students. 

Fortunately I had a passion for it but   I definitely had a lot of blunders I reflect on it now and I'm like, oh my goodness   and that led me to kind of really start  thinking about education. I went on and got my  

master's at University of Maryland. They had a  track that was focused on education so I did have   some formal education where I was prepped on how  to present PowerPoints and delivery   and things of that nature and then transition to  a full-time faculty position at a small    private institution in Maryland that did not  have a formalized training for novice educators,   did not have any type of orientation program, it  just couldn't support it I think and really  

found it to be challenging and I think I got  through it because I had some good colleagues   who were experienced and who kind of informally  answered questions and just you it helped me along  

the way and I had a passion for it. I really found  my niche later on I moved to a larger community   college, Montgomery College, and they had a  formalized program and I learned things   three years after being a full-time faculty that  I had never learned - item analysis,    exam reviews as a team and then I had  an opportunity and really was supported through   professional development. Recently I did the NLN 

Sim Lead. I've done lots of professional   development on my own and that has really  helped my career and really helped me sustain   as a faculty member. So that's my long journey like two minutes. And you know what, your journey sounds   like a lot of other nurse educators journeys. I  think a lot of us went straight from clinical   practice whether it was working as a nurse or a 

nurse practitioner. Similar journey - I was a nurse   practitioner and I got a call that they were in need of clinical instructors and that was   my segue into nursing education and  I did that for one semester and the next thing   you know there was a full-time nursing assistant 

professor position and I went for it. So it was   like semester of being a clinical faculty and then  next thing you know was full-time professor and   like you, said being a nurse practitioner does not  prepare you for being a nurse educator.    I'll never forget writing my first test. I thought it was brilliant. Luckily, I had a mentor   and I wrote it and I gave it to my mentor and it  came back with so many red marks all over it and   the first time I tried to put a syllabus together. 

I mean, these are things that we're not taught as   nurse practitioners and those skills that are  necessary to be in effective educator that    like you said, you were lucky you had class,  you had a great mentor to show you the way, but I   think about all the other faculty who really don't  have that orientation or that mentorship   going from clinical practice to academia. So  Elizabeth, tell us about your journey. How did   you get into nursing education?

I think as you mentioned   most of ours are very similar and really kind  of how we got there. I was fortunate though that   I had been on a floor for at least three years  years before being asked to be a preceptor but it   wasn't that it wasn't a lot longer and while  I was precepting on the floor and became one of   the primary educators on our unit with really  teaching newborn resuscitation and ACLS and BLS   I really kind of started finding my passion and 

spark for for educating and education. I also had   some amazing faculty when I was in nursing school.  One in particular that always comes to mind for me   and that she was really an amazing mentor  and great role model even from the profession   and then moving into the education 

standpoint. So I embarked on an MSN in education   as well and then kind of ended up in a little bit  of a reverse of my roles because my husband is   retired military and so we traveled a lot with  his job because he was in the military for 29   years and so we were actually stationed overseas  and I hadn't had the opportunity to be using my  

degree. I graduated with my degree when I was  over there, kept teaching BLS and ACLS and they   kind of came to me and said hey, we have this job  that came open and it was actually in simulation   so I was actually a simulation coordinator and  director before I was in academia as a faculty so   I kind of ended up a little bit of the reverse but  still needing to use those same things that you're   needing to do within a clinical setting and we 

were with a medical group that really trained med   techs, nurses, physicians, everybody - all health  care professions and then when we moved back to   the states I had the opportunity of becoming an  adjunct faculty for a really short period of time.   and then I became full-time faculty but as you had 

mentioned, Jasline, it's really interesting. You   prepare in your education even as an MSN in Ed  not even just so much as an advanced practice   registered nurse, you still don't get the experience  of really operationalizing everything really   well and so same thing as you had mentioned I  thought I created some amazing exams and then   when half my class failed I was like oh that  probably wasn't the best exam at all and really   try to backtrack to say okay - this was my mess up.

Let's figure out how to get you guys   back on track and then just really navigating and  managing a classroom because what I thought   was an amazing idea and really had to struggle  with a lot is that I'm a very and I think that's   probably what geared me towards simulation a lot  I'm an experiential learner myself and so I always   liked those hands-on activities and like the  things that really kind of helped you do things   and some students in an ADN program really didn't 

appreciate that. Those first couple   of years were really difficult and then I embarked  on my my PhD and I chose education as my PhD so   my I continued that focus to be able to align  with pedagogical research and looking   at education and that lens because I think it's  important as you mentioned Kellie to to really   understand how did you become an educator from  those other areas and those other experiences   that you had and I think unfortunately there 

are moments in time that I think our profession   especially when you do look at researchers in  academia nursing educational research really   isn't the big bucket item like that's not where  you know you don't typically get funded really   well, you're not like the lime light because it's always it's just education.   But to me it's always been extremely important to make sure that we're educating our our profession appropriately.

Yes, and it is important so you  wrote a wonderful article with for the Nurse   Educator with some of your colleagues as I  mentioned called, "A Scoping Review of Nurse  

Educator Competencies

Mind the Gap." Do you  mind telling us a little bit about your recent   article? What was the reasoning for deciding  to do this scoping review? Absolutely, thank you. So this particular  article that I wrote with Dr. Sharpnack,   Darla Gruben, Dr. Klenke-Borgmann, Dr. Goliat  and Dr. Yeager kind of really came about the first  

conference back face-to-face with NLN. So  went to the conference in DC and there was   a lot of conversation I believe that was the  same year that Dr. Leighton was the speaker   and started hearing the buzz of the new article that had come out from Cavanaugh on Dr. Sharpnack and   how significantly it went down from that 23%  to this 9% and then even again to 7% and so I   kind of was sitting there during that time and  started thinking, you know, what is  

really going on in our culture of education  and for students in specific. I'm very,    I try to be reflective on my practice as a nurse  educator and like I mentioned the first test that   I wrote my almost over half my class failed  so when I looked at that in my mind the   failure wasn't on their part. The failure was on  my part and so as I started thinking about this   article and hearing everything that was going on  and all the conversations that were occurring.   

A light bulb kind of went off in my mind and  I said, you know, I think actually Dr. Klenke-   Borgmann was sitting next to me and I said, "when is it going to be on us?" because in my   mind this is similar to that when you do that  item analysis on a test and half your class  

has failed - it's not on the student anymore. And so  to me the light bulb was like, okay, wait a second,   we have progressively gone down in our students  preparation for residency and I'm very specific   about for residency because that makes it even  more I think a little bit a bigger red flag to me   is that it's not that they're ready for practice.  That article is saying that they were 7% ready for   residency and so that's not on them anymore. That's 

us. What are we doing to really help prepare them   for practice and what are we doing to be able  to help us be able to be better educators?    When you look at historically and you know always  coming off of a conference you always hear newer   things and different things that you're doing,  but historically we've never really been great   with the number of faculty that we have for  nursing. We know that there's a shortage of  

nurses and faculty is even worse. So we've  done I think our education practice   a disservice because we did reach out and say, oh,  well, you're an amazing practitioner.    Your patients love you. You have everything all organized, like you're probably   one of the best people I've seen do this this and  this you communicate with your patients. Well,    why don't you come and teach? It's a completely 

different world. It's not even ... somebody that's   amazing in practice is getting thrown  right back into that novice role and they   don't understand if they haven't, I mean, even with  both Jasline and I we both said we took   master's courses in education but yet neither one  of us was really shown how do you write test items?   How do you analyze the test? What does your  syllabus look like? How are you writing outcomes?  

I mean you do it, but it's in that same context  of our students that you're just so in   the moment of trying to do things that you  don't really get to contextualize it really great and so that was really kind of where  this whole article where that guided. Dr. Sharpnack   happened to be at the same conference and so her  being one of those primary authors on the actual   article I reached out to her and I said would you consider joining us? And she  

said absolutely. She said this is so important,  this is such important work and so we did the   scoping review and as with any scoping review  it takes a lot of iterations because you have   to read a lot, you have to go back, you have to really,  really get into the into the meat of what it is   saying and it was it was really interesting and  it was amazing it was an amazing team to be able   to really pull it together and look at what what 

we came out with and that's where the minding the gap is.   Elizabeth thank you for sharing that. I was at that conference as well and I can echo   the response that we felt as educators, you know,  it was a call to action for all of us and I love   that you were able to do this work and response to  it because I personally I've struggled and you   know I've tried different initiatives - where do we 

go with this? And as you were speaking I was just   thinking about the parallels that we see as new  nurses enter the profession, the challenges they   have very similar to new educators who enter the  faculty role and you know we have a lot of data   saying that it's only 7% who's ready  for residency. I'd be curious to know   how many educators are truly ready as they enter  and what does that look like and what   type of action do we need to take in response 

to that? So I mean some of the things   that you said really resonated with me. Thank you  for sharing that. I think we wanted to know what   did you find most surprising from your research in  writing this article?

I mean, I think interestingly   enough because the we had some pretty in-depth  conversations while we were looking through   the literature and really kind of looking at the  background and what we were trying to to look at   one of the bigger things I think for us that was  surprising is the number of times we really  

had to go back and look again. We used Covidence and so we went through the whole process of narrowing things down but we also  didn't come up with many very articles that really   spoke to the purpose and that focus of competency  in nurse educators and that was one of the other   things and and Jasline you kind of sparked my  thought process again when I was talking about  

when all this was happening. This also happened to  be the same time that AACN had decided to come out   with the new Essentials speaking to really where  they were looking at with those level ones and   level twos and it it was a difficult conference  because there was a lot of rumbling to where there   was no longer that support for the MSN in education and so if you're saying from a larger   accrediting body that that may not be the route  any... but they have since retracted on that  

thought process and that feeling, but our voices  were heard as what I'm hoping as to why that was   retracted but it really was interesting that you  have this significant very significant number and   you think that just changing the competencies  for students is going to make that difference   yet we're still not looking at how are they being  educated and that's I mean I think that's really   that missing link. I think that's a huge problem  so I don't think we really that was probably the  

biggest thing. and we had intended well,maybe we could do a systematic because   there's more rigor to a systematic and there's more in depth looking at a systematic   and looking at those metrics. We didn't even have  enough when we pulled it through the questions   that we had. We didn't have enough articles to 

even consider a systematic review. There was no   way that we would have gotten any analysis or any  of the rigor within it so we actually had to   shift after a couple of conversations to a scoping  because we were really trying to inform because I   think that's the hope to and as you mentioned,  what is that percentage of competency   for educators is that something that needs to 

be researched and looked at. I think the   thought process now with this scoping review  is really hoping to spark people's interest in -    we really need to look at this like. There is  a correlation and where is   that correlation in not truly preparing the  students appropriately well? Are we not   preparing because one we're educating with some  antiquated models of education because we do what   we do best as to what we know because we're going 

to fall into our comfort zone right. I don't know   how many times it's like, oh yeah, I'm going to do  this amazing flipped classroom and I'm do all this   stuff and you do it and the students are like that 

was awful, why did you do that. You get all   the push back from them so you kind of hesitantly  revert back to, okay, fine I'll just do a PowerPoint   because I guess you're just gonna open up your  brain and I'm going to dump this knowledge into   your brain and you're going to know it by the time  you go out, but I mean that's that biggest part of  

competency, right? Just because somebody knows it  doesn't mean they can do it and that's I think   that's the same thing with nurse educators so I  don't think there was really a whole lot that was   a huge surprise to us except really the number  of literature because there's still   a significant gap and we really need to be addressing that.

Yeah, I have to say that was most   surprising too that during your scope review  I think it was 11 articles use and so I love   the fact that we bring up we're always so  focused on the students and what the students need   to do to meet these competencies and now it's like  well, we need to look at ourselves and take a look  

in the mirror. There's so many of us who are not  getting our EdDs or or not getting master's   in nursing education or like me I had my DNP is  a nursing education, which is kind of rare to find.   So for all of these new faculty that are that  are coming from clinical practice, what can   we recommend because we need them but the expectation is we don't expect everybody to   go back to school to get a full degree in nursing 

education. So what can we do to kind of close that   gap and so that we have nurse education who are  prepared to meet those nurse educator competencies   what can be done and I'll both of you also? 

Yeah, I think it's interesting because   it's such a huge ... nursing education isn't just oh  you're going to do this one thing and it's going   to be amazing it's going to be perfect and it's going  to be I feel like it's almost that you even   have pockets of specialization within academia  and I think we've done a really good job of saying   that it's this umbrella thing but it truly isn't  because in my mind when I look at like myself  

for instance - I'm an amazing simulationist. I  mean yes, I'm gonna brag on myself because I   love simulation. Maybe my students may not  think I'm an amazing simulations, but I think I am   and so that was where my interest became really 

truly focused on right. So I knew I was going to   know those standards of best practice inside and  out and how am I going to apply them and I'm going   to do all the professional development to make me  right so I have advanced designation   because I was very intentional in growing my  specialty in simulation. I'm a horrible test writer  

and I'll say it admittingly. I mean, I don't like  and I don't even know if it's just that I'm   a horrible test writer or I just don't like it  because I don't always feel that it's the great   measurement of assessment. It's not an authentic  assessment in my mind because test questions   are usually very knowledge-focused and when  you try to pull out the application into a   test question it just becomes cumbersome and then  the students complain and say you don't know what  

you're doing as a test writer. Then they  start blaming you for not knowing what you're   doing with your job so I think we need to  look at there's also those focus areas within   the specialty itself but I think supporting our  colleagues and our peers is one of the biggest   things we it's really sometimes in my mind a  little shameful that we still hear that really   horrible statement about eating our young I've  done a really I hope I've done a very a decent  

job within my own practice that I try really hard  to make sure that I'm supporting and trying to   help mentor those that are really coming in behind  because you're only going to make a better person   if you're supporting them and lifting them up pull  pushing people down and knocking them down isn't   going to help support them they're not going to  stay in academia they're going to have we're gonna   have the same statistics that we have in practice 

right now with with a brand new educator leaving   within a year or two years of even being an  educator so how can we support to really grow our   educators and really model behaviors that we would  hope that they can model right so I think nursing   programs in themselves and this is this is a big  ask because we do have a huge nursing shortage   a faculty nursing shortage but I think having  appropriate mentorship models and structures   that can help with onboarding newer faculty

especially if they're novice faculty because a   brand new faculty, I mean, there's a gap in the  literature that we're not talking about competency   but we've been talking about it long enough  that we're not supporting each other well enough.  

So if you you have somebody that's an amazing  practitioner and you've recruited them and said   hey, you got to come work with us as an adjunct  then it's I think some of the onuses on that who's   bringing them in and who's hiring them to say okay  well, what's this structure going to look like for   me to help mentor you, what does it look like when  building your your courses, what does it look like   when you're creating tests, how should they align 

with your curriculum and how are they blueprinted   back to the objectives and outcomes of your  course because I don't think people understand   that either how is everything within the  curriculum structured and aligned to be able to   meet those outcomes and the objectives and I think  a lot of times it becomes that content focus of, oh   well, they get into practice that's the hard part  is that translation of that article ended up being   that students don't know how to start IVs when 

they get to the hospital. No that's not, that's the   misinterpretation of what we mean by them not  being able to do things a bachelor's prepared   nurse or an ADN nurse. That's not, it's not task  oriented. It's what's behind what's the outcome.  

What are you truly needing them to do to  understand because they could start an IV but if   they don't understand that they could have blown  the vein or that they could have eviscerated it or   that they could have done some damage or if they  didn't test do an Allen's test that they could   have created some kind of circulatory dysfunction  like there's other things that we need to pull out   and I think that's where it starts we need to  truly be supporting our new educators and what  

that looks like is is professional development  and mentorship models and it's not going to come   from just one location. I mean, NLN is our  primary location for education as nurses and   they can help with some of the lift but that's 

a huge burden to bear by themselves. I mean, they   can't mentor every single faculty coming in, they  can't offer professional development for every   single person or nursing coming in so  I think even just pockets regionally to help   with some of those things with our experts and  looking for people that can mentor because I   think that helps with that sense of belonging  as well.

We have seemed to go over our time   allocation for this podcast so join me in part two  as we continue our conversation with Dr. Jasline   Moreno and Dr. Elizabeth Wells-Beede to discuss  more about educator competencies on part two. [Music]

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android