Competency-Based Education in Action: Rethinking Clinical Learning - podcast episode cover

Competency-Based Education in Action: Rethinking Clinical Learning

Jan 22, 202626 minSeason 6Ep. 1
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

In this episode of NLN Nursing EDge Unscripted, hosts Drs. Kellie Bryant and Raquel Bertiz are joined by Dr. Rose Rossi and Dr. Stephanie Jeffers to explore leadership and innovation in nursing education. The conversation centers on competency-based education (CBE) as a framework for rethinking and redesigning clinical education in undergraduate nursing programs. Drs. Rossi and Jeffers discuss how clinical competencies are defined, assessed, and aligned with program outcomes to better support student readiness for practice. They highlight the role of academic leadership, faculty collaboration, and data-informed decision-making in advancing competency-based approaches. Together, the discussion offers practical insights for nurse educators seeking to modernize clinical education while maintaining quality, consistency, and meaningful outcomes.

For additional insights on Widener University’s approach to competency-based clinical education, visit Dr. Stephanie Jeffers’ faculty page on the Widener University website, where her contact information is available: https://www.widener.edu/about/faculty-directory/stephanie-jeffers.

Dedicated to excellence in nursing, the National League for Nursing is the leading organization for nurse faculty and leaders in nursing education. Find past episodes of the NLN Nursing EDge podcast online. Get instant updates by following the NLN on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, Bluesky, and YouTube. For more information, visit NLN.org.

Transcript

Welcome to another episode of the NLN podcast,  Nursing EDge Unscripted. We are your hosts for today's episode. I'm Dr. Kellie Bryant and I'm  joined here by my colleague, Dr. Raquel Bertiz from the National League for Nursing. In this  episode, we will be talking about a very hot topic and a timely topic. Nursing education's  continued drive for excellence and competency based education. And this conversation is going to 

focus in particular on clinical education. Before we dive into the full conversation, let's share  some of our reflections right after the taping. We're always looking for practical solutions  on how to operationalize CBE and obviously from the conversation they do offer like the  concrete steps. So how do you do this? Yeah, that was a very, very informative podcast. I really  enjoyed speaking to Rose and and and Stephanie.

What I loved about it the most was that when  they started talking about the process, you know, it wasn't that they just jumped into creating  this tool that the fact that they had this two-day workshop where they kind of mapped out their  curriculum to figure out which competencies or outcomes belong in whether it's didactic, clinical  or simulation and then were able to come up with, you know, the the the behaviors and and this this 

tool. I think that was an important first step and the fact that they also involved faculty.  the faculty kind of owned it and then even had student input. I thought that was a great way of  making sure that, you know, they got that buy in, right? I like their emphasis on involving clinical  instructors and that clinical instructors are are vital to any nursing program implementation 

and how they need to be prepared. And and I think that brings us back to many of our issues  with clinical instructor preparation where we ask them to okay go ahead and swim and but also  yeah it also gave us a new perspective on how to conduct clinical evaluation because let's face it  a lot of us you know at our universities have this this long, 10 page tool with the med partially  met and all these outcomes which are like they were saying are very broad you You 

know, I love the fact that now it's based off of competencies and students add their  input and they're able to identify, you know, the behaviors that met that competency and they  have an input along with the faculty. So again, having more of that student centered focus,  I think, is is where we need to move when it comes to clinical evaluation. So, it's nice  to have a new model, a new way of thinking, approach to clinical evaluation because I do  think we've been stuck in our our old ways.

Let's turn from our reflections to the experts  driving this important conversation. Our guests today are from Widener University School  of Nursing who have developed an innovative model in which students use a competency-based  clinical evaluation tool each week as part of their clinical evaluation. Our guests today are  Dr. Rose Rossi, Professor Emmeritus, and Dr. Stephanie Jeffers, associate dean of undergraduate  programs at Widener University School of Nursing.

I want to welcome Rose and Stephanie. Thank you  for joining us today. Thank you for having us. Thank you. All right. So, I'm just going to  dive right in and start with tell us a little bit about how you came up with this idea to start  this competency based assessment in the clinical setting. Give us the background on that. Well,  I think first the first thing that we realized at Widener was we wanted to get all of the  faculty buy in as we were moving to the new AACN

essentials. So this really started by us having a  full faculty meeting at workshop where we laid out all the domains and all the competencies and the  all the sub-competencies and we asked our faculty to a map where all of these occurred in each of  their courses and then so that was sort of part one but part two then we said what does this look  like? what does this look like for your students

based on your courses? So asking faculty to really  begin to think about this in from a competency perspective as opposed to just a knowledge  perspective I think was a good jumping point and Steph could really talk about her own course  which is where she did a lot of this work. Well, I would like to say that when Rose said that  we mapped everything out, we literally mean mapped

it out. There were poster boards, papers, we had  Post-it notes so that, you know, we could tag different areas, different domains, what goes with  which competency. And the faculty would write down on each of those slips of paper behaviors that  were associated with the competency that they would expect students to achieve competency in by  the end of the semester in clinical. As far as the courses at the time, I was faculty in both junior  level and senior level medical surgical nursing.

And so with our faculty that t taught in those  courses, we came up with behaviors that were associated with each domain and then posted them  on all of the corresponding areas on the map. The other thing that was really nice as we did  this is that we broke out which of these behaviors would we want to measure in clinical in simulation  and which of these behaviors would we measure in

more objective ways objective testing. So having  faculty really begin to break that down I think helped put it in perspective for them and then for  us. So that was really step one. What this did, I think, was help the students then own that that  this behavior, these behaviors were theirs to create and theirs to develop. And it wasn't, I'm  just going to sit back and be a sponge. It was, oh, I now have to seek out opportunities to try 

and meet this behavior. And I think that really helped engage the students in a way that were  sometimes a little more passive than we would have liked them to be. That sounds very interesting.  I'm I'm sure I'm pretty sure that we're always looking for more student engagement and from what  you've said, it sounds like a lot of things you have done to get to where you are right now. So  I'm curious what were your biggest challenges

with implementing this new approach? I would  say the biggest challenge was educating clinical instructors. So we had to present it to them as  a new instrument and let's be honest everybody has difficulty with change. So just providing that  education and saying look this is how we're going to measure competency the and then we provide  examples under each domain. So for example, if somebody needed to meet interprofessional  collaboration competencies, how did they interact

with inter the interprofessional team? Did the  student describe interactions in the clinical setting with the patient? And so we just had to  provide that education to the clinical faculty and myself, I was a course coordinator for  junior level medical surgical nursing when we implemented this instrument. And I provided  a lot of support because sometimes the clinical instructors weren't sure if they were doing the  right thing or providing the right feedback to

the student. How are they evaluating what the  student is writing in their instrument weekly? So at the beginning it was a little difficult  but they sort of picked it up pretty quickly. And the students also I will say initially they  were focused on tasks and skills. Today I did a Foley insertion. Yesterday I took vital signs.  Whatever the skill was, they were mostly focusing on that. But with some prompting from the clinical  instructors, the students began to really reflect.

So when you're reflecting, you're thinking about  what you're doing. You're not just doing a skill. And by the end of the semester, I could really  I would read some of these clinical evaluation tools just to make sure that they were completing  them correctly. And it really seemed like the students had pride in what they were doing now  because they're like, "Oh, I did this for my patient. My patient had difficulty breathing and 

I assessed them. I changed their position or I talked to them if the patient was having anxiety  and it seemed like they were really more invested in their education as far as completing behaviors  and thinking about what they're doing at clinical. The other challenge we had which I think was  interesting and we didn't quite anticipate this was the use of technology in our learning  management system because ultimately what we wanted was one document where students could see 

their progression each week. And that was really difficult to do because we wanted one document  where they could write their, you know, under their behaviors each week or under each domain  each week what they did so they could see it and then faculty could comment. And we couldn't quite  get there with our LMS. So, we ended up having to be a little bit more creative in how that 

happened. Because we wanted our instructors to be able to say, "Oh, on week one, this is what the  students said when they addressed this behavior and on week 10, this is what they said." And you  could see the growth over time. So that was a little bit of a challenge that we tried a couple  different things and and we were doing those

things even before we rolled this out. So we had a  number of our faculty who were clinical, you know, who were the students and I was the instructor  and we'd be like fill this in and let's see how this goes. So I if I had my wish I would figure  out a different LMS system where this might work a little bit easier. But I think what we have is  workable and usable and we're not changing our LMS

anytime soon. That's for sure. Yes. So you just  described a beautiful student centered approach to learning that the students are active in, you  know, assessing where they're at and how they're meeting their clinical outcomes, which I love.  One question I have is a little bit more specific about the tool. So, can you tell me a little bit  more about what this tool looked like and how it

was implemented? Meaning, did the students fill  it out first and then the faculty kind of make comments to it, you know, after the clinical day?  And and my other question is, and what happens at the end of the semester where there may be some  gaps where the students weren't able to, you know, demonstrate a certain behavior? How did you  address that? So, the students needed to complete the clinical evaluation tool where they would 

address one or two domains per week. Obviously, you're not going to meet all of the domains  every single time the students in clinical. So one or two things that really stood out to  them and so they had to reflect on what the behaviors were that were required or suggested  for that particular domain, write some examples, and then the clinical instructor would 

then provide feedback on that. And there's a little rubric in the in the learning management  system that says meets expectations or, you know, needs improvement, that kind of thing. So if the  student was too short with their response or they didn't provide a lot of detail, instructors would  encourage them to do so for the next time. Or sometimes it ended up being more like a discussion  post. So like there was conversation back and forth with the instructor and the student. 

It was more than the instructor just saying, "Hey, great job." It was the instructor sort  of reflecting back on the student what the student achieved and identifying those skills and  behaviors that were required for that particular competency. And if there was an area where maybe  the student get a lot didn't get an opportunity but for example they never encountered an ethical 

dilemma. The instructors would then say, "Okay, you didn't encounter an ethical dilemma,  but what would you do if?" And then they would give them a scenario or a situation and  have them reflect on that situation. And that way we weren't saying, "Oh, well, there were no  ethical dilemmas that the students encountered, therefore we're not going to address this 

domain." They provided them, you know, scenarios or opportunities to then discuss  what would you have done if this scenario happened or you know what would you have done  if you thought the nurse was giving the wrong medication? What would you have done if this 

event happened? And I think even in the feedback which the instructors were wonderful in is they  would they would say okay so you talked about this what would you do next time to further  expand what you did and giving students an opportunity to really think about those things  differently and say okay well okay you did this this is great this was a great start what's  your next step what would you do after that allow the students to really begin to think about 

how they will continue to grow as a professional nurse. That sounds really interesting. And I  think I was going to ask you this question but since you started on that note my curiosity is  all about because you're doing this competency based evaluation and use of the clinical teaching  tool. How has your clinical teaching kind of like expanded if that's the right term for that or or  shifted? So, because we're evaluating them this way, I'm curious, so how are we teaching them now 

to get there? I think that clinical instructors are doing more debriefing with students now and  encouraging reflection to assist students with identifying areas of strength and areas where the  student might have to improve. And I think that is helpful to have a dialogue with the student  because you're encouraging them to think about the rationale for their interventions or the 

rationale for particular assessment. And that is really kind of the key to the competency based  education is you're doing more thinking than doing

tasks and skills. So I think that this shift is  more having more conversations and encouraging more reflective thinking with the students as far  as the clinical instructors go and to and to add to what Steph is saying, you know, one of the big  struggles that clinical instructors often have is they don't want to upset a student by, you  know, giving them poor feedback and they don't they're not always comfortable giving giving that  constructive feedback or they don't quite know

what to say. When a student has written something  down like that and they have something to work on, it's much more collaborative. It's not, oh, me  as the clinical instructor saying you didn't do a great job. And I think it's helped our clinical  instructors be more comfortable in their role when and and they're great practitioners and sometimes  what happens is you have an amazing nurse and now they've stepped into that clinical instructor  role and they're trying to learn that skill set of

how to be a strong clinical instructor. And this  gives them the opportunity to learn how to provide feedback in a way that's positive and constructive  and collaborative and doesn't feel negative and punitive to the student because we never want a  student to walk away feeling like, "Oh my god, my clinical instructor thinks I'm not smart and  I'm not cut out to do this." And the instrument, I think, really helps that collaboration in a 

way that we didn't have before. other our other tool was truthfully you know did you exceed you  know or meet or didn't meet like this behavior and then the other thing that we did because  these behaviors make sense and I'm going to be totally transparent our prior clinical evaluation  tools were so vague apply the natural social and sciences and humanities to the care of the patient  And the instructors were like, "What does that

mean? How do I evaluate that?" And now we have  an instrument that's very clear like we have very specific behaviors we expect our students to  do. And so now they understand what their role is. The other thing I think that was really helpful in  this when we met with all the faculty is that we were able to scaffold behaviors in a way so that  we weren't double dipping. So and it was helpful in particular in Steph's situation where she was 

in junior med surge and senior med surge. So the behaviors for the junior students were different  than the behaviors of the senior students. And because of that, we could see the growth  over time. And we're very fortunate at Widener, we were not in an environment that was very much  a top down. Everything comes from the dean rolling down. And because of that I think engaging the  faculty in this really made the difference because without engaging the faculty this would never have 

happened. Well we all worked together during that workshop and so doing that together as a team  the faculty now own the clinical evaluation tool especially for their particular specialty area. So  they have the input into it and so they know that this is something that they have helped to create  and so I feel like that helps them but that's the buy in to have people involved they'll be more  vested in they'll be more likely to to implement

it. So the fact that you went to the faculty and  had to develop it that was that was great and also I love the fact that you involved students too  because it sounds like you even had the student you know buy in. So if you ever want to implement  something, yeah, those are the steps. And we were really lucky because our sim faculty came, 

right? Then they got and and I also have to say, you know, we have several of our faculty  teach across undergrad and grad, but we have a significant number of faculty who just teach at  the graduate level. and they came to the undergrad meeting with us to kind of give us support and  come up with suggestions and help people who were struggling of writing you know objectives and 

you know behavioral outcomes. So I think what Steph is saying is right that whole team approach  you know it made it better and I was in Steph's role before Steph was in it and I don't want to  be the person being saying this is how you have to do things like that was just never my approach.  So I loved the collaborative experience and I have to say by the end of day two we were tired. It 

was exhausting. Yeah. I was I was going to ask you cuz when you talked about the process, how  you mapped out everything to say, you know, which outcomes are met in simulation, didactic versus  clinical, how long did it take you? This was like a two day full day. It was two full days. So  the first day we literally were mapping out where things were and then we were writing objectives  that we were going to use in our syllabi. Right.

Right. And then day two we were then developing  the behaviors everywhere where we said, "Oh, this lives in clinical." Then day two, we were writing  the behavior. So by the end of day two, we were all pretty done. And this was at the end of the  semester, right? We were done. Yeah. We were like, "All right, we're done. We've had Excellent."  So I believe when we had a prior conversation, you have just started this pilot. Was it this 

summer or last? Yes. So tell me now that you have you know a few semesters under your belt using  this new model. What were those aha moments? Was there anything that surprised you whether it's  you know logistically how you rolled this out or when you looked at the data from this you know  the valuations was there anything that kind of you know surprised you that you weren't expecting? I  would say for me it was reading what the students

were writing. Over time it became more detailed,  a lot of depth, a lot of emotion in it too. Especially if they were dealing with situations  that were challenging such as, you know, the patient was a rapid response or somebody there  was quite a few students that had patients that were aggressive or you know there was safety  concerns with the staff and so they really addressed it in a very professional manner and I 

was happy about that. thing, but also like the way they reflected on what they thought they needed  to do as far as interventions or doing assessments really showed me their growth over a period of  time. So, I was pleased with that. This semester over the fall we have all of the specialties and  meds surge doing their own clinical evaluation tools. So the specialties tweaked their own  examples for competencies or they use the same domains but the examples would be different you 

know for maternity or pediatrics. So I'm waiting until finals are over to review all of those.  And I've required requested feedback from faculty about is there anything that we need to change in  the language of the document? How did it work for your clinical instructors? And so that we can move  it forward. Well, yeah, all of this really sound exciting and so if you could leave your our fellow  nurse educators with one takeaway about competency

based clinical education, what would it be? I  think actively engaging the clinical instructors. They're our biggest assets and we want them to  feel like they're a vital part of everything we do. And I think by actively engaging them in this  process, they feel like they're our partners now and not just this, you know, group on the side.  Steph, what do you think? I would say focus on thinking not just doing because competence is  about clinical judgment and not just tasks or

skills. Oh, what a wonderful way to to end our  podcast. I can't believe the 20 minutes went by so quickly. I feel like we can go on and on on  this topic. So, I want to thank you both Rose and Stephanie for such a wonderful conversation on  a very timely and important topic. I again want to say thank you for joining us and sharing your  innovative approach to evaluating in the clinical

setting. And for those of you that are joining us  today, thank you for listening to our podcast and we look forward to you joining us on our next  podcast. Thank you and take care. Thank you.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android