85: Overman

No facts with Adam curry for August 6 2022 Episode number 85. Fully Cuf recovered, ready to go to school once again, Adam curry coming to you from the heart of the Texas Hill Country and it is time once again to spin the Wheel of topics from here to Northern Virginia. Please say hello to my friend on the other end, Mr. Moe facts? How you know Adam, much better thank you for asking, well, how are you?

I'm doing I'm doing great. Just ready to get this show in. I'm glad to hear that you beat the coup for the second time. Unbelievable man that was it's so debilitating. What a waste of time this bio weapon they've unleashed on us. Well, depends on how you look at it. Well, that's true. That's a very good point. Hey, man, it's good to hear your voice. I missed you. We don't talk enough. But

what we get is what I cherish because I'm ready. And you know, you've been you've been taking me on an interesting journey, in general, across all of my thinking and across all of my shows with some of this, like the last episode, man with eugenic stuff that's starting to have some kind of influence on me most I want you to know, and I have a feeling it's by design. I just pay attention to everything and you know, the

rest. And then I just kind of come here and share it. And I think we kind of bulk about eugenics through the lens of Roe v. Wade and current events that were going on. Yeah, but now we gotta go back, you know, and you know, get back to it. So I guess we need to spin the wheel. All right, here we go spin the wheel of topics round and round. It goes where it stops. Nobody knows except, well, Moe knows because he put together another excellent episode for us the

topic for Moe facts with Adam curry episode 85. Is Is there a relationship between race and mental capacity? Well, this is a key question when it comes to eugenics. I've learned that. Yes. So what we got to do is we got to take take a deeper look at evolution, as well as genetics and social Darwinism and their impact on race or how races are viewed. So. Okay, oh, it's a continuation somewhat of the last show. Yeah, but we need

to get deeper into the ideology of Darwinism. Some some might look at it as a religion. Yeah, you know, the more I look at it, the more the more I learn. And it seems like there's a whole bunch of stuff I missed about Darwinism and Darwin, and all of these jokes. It's might not be by accident, that really, there's some masking going on, but I guess we can go ahead and get into Darwin, Africa and genocide.

By the last decades of the 19th century, Darwin's theory was increasingly popular among Germany's intellectual elite. Darwin had claimed that humans and other mammals were the product of what he called natural selection, a blind struggle for existence, where the fittest survived and reproduced, and the less fit died off. In his book The Descent of Man, Darwin made clear that his idea of natural selection had implications for human society.

Charles Darwin clearly was a social Darwinist, he was not as rabid a social Darwinist as some of his followers later on. But he clearly did believe that Darwinism should be applied to human societies. Darwin worried that civilized societies were harming humanity by helping the poor, caring for the sick, and otherwise saving those who nature would have killed off. Darwin feared that such humanitarianism could eventually destroy the human race.

Yes, pesky nature. pesky nature, Darwinism is actually the root of eugenics the way I see it. And I got some pushback. We'll get later to that, because actually, people some people wrote in and push back against it. So that's always good. Yeah, that ideas are being challenged.

But we have to lay it out and the dissent a man, this is a quote, Darwin, Charles Darwin said, at some future period, not very distant, as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace throughout the world, the savage races, right? It's right there. Black and white. I saw it too. And it's a lot of science hinges on Darwinism, and this is why they had to be carefully protected protective of him in

his image. Because when you pull that, you know, like one Jenga break, the whole thing might fall down, right? This is why I

will say you might have experienced a masking going oh, God, thank You said you don't remember the full title of the book that we didn't know. And in fact, a lot of people will give us the full title again. I don't have it right now. But it again, I got it here somewhere. Hold on a second. Because yeah, that's that's actually quite critical. Well, we had the, it was the the Origin of Species, here we go. I customize it, but I want to get it exactly right.

The Origin of Species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of Favoured Races in the struggle for life. And it's right there on wiki pedia big ass picture, a scan of the of the original cover page. Now, some might say we're looking too deep into the word races, and it's more scientific. But when you couple that with this statement from the Descent of Man, he's talking about humans, and there being different levels or races or however you want to sub genres or sub races, because he

distinguishes the civilized races from the savage races. So

I want to make sure we're we're being completely as we always do, I'm biased and, you know, objective when we discuss these topics, but right, as science hinges on this, a large part of racism and the understanding of racism hinges on this same ideology. No, no kids out of this come out of this kind of manifest destiny and all the other things that oh, it's our role to exterminate. It's crazy. And even Dvorak, I said, Do you know the full

title? He said, No. He said, No. And when I told him, it's like, Huh. Yeah, wish that show you how well they masked to just chop off a whole whole half of a title, which is very damning. When you cut, like I said, when you couple that with other statements, so I guess we can go ahead and get in, we're gonna jump to another. That was let me just be clear that was from that's from discovery science. It's not from some music by the music, you might think it's from some YouTube video. But that was

actually from discovery science. And this now we're going to jump over to this is, was Darwin a racist. And this is where Adam Gopnik, let me just give you a little background on him. He's from the New Yorker. And he wrote a book when we see the name of the book, author of angels, angels and ages, a short book about Darwin, Lincoln and modern life, which Lincoln and

Darwin a very tied together in the sense. As we talked about an early episode, I forget which one it was how Lincoln's view that America was a white nation that should be preserved for white people. Yep. So all of this ties together. And it's I find it interesting, interesting that he tied those two together in his book, but I'm going to clip to be

cut to a particular chase here. Steve was something I thought we talked about later, but since it came up now, and that is Darwin and race you talked about and you had to sort of put onto the mayor, you had to put it in, in quotes, the wild mele, the, the Negro, because obviously, Darwin in thinking about race, spoke a language had a vocabulary, which is no longer our vocabulary,

necessarily. It's a vocabulary of an earlier time. And yet one of the most sensitive, tender, difficult, contentious issues in Darwinism and understanding Darwin is, is Darwin's attitude about race, because one of the things that comes up again, and again, I'm sure you found this as I have in going around the country with with this book is that the claim that Darwin himself was inherently racist, is then extrapolated claim that Darwinism itself is inherently racist, which is one of the

reasons why evolutionary biologists want to get out from under Darwin. And it comes from two directions, it comes both from the direction of the creationist right to, to dub it

that way. That is who wants to show that there's something anti Universalist about Darwin, and it also comes from the left, who wants to show that Darwinism doesn't lead by accident, to social Darwinism to the belief in eugenics and into various ugly kinds of 20th century racism, but that it leads logically into though into into that kind of, of a into eugenics and into the ugliest sides of 20th century history. Oh man, another book have to add to my reading list.

So, a few points I want to point out in this clip one the vocabulary of earlier time by right they they're still trying to Yeah, that's that's voicing it was like, Well, you know, the, the Second Amendment they had muskets back in the day, you mean something like that. Also that when you're trying to be protective over an ideology

is based on a person. And they want to say they want to separate Darwin from Darwinism. And his whole you know, saying his whole all his studies his work, because modern science is based deeply on that. And then you got to listen to the

enemies. He has enemies from the left and the right. His enemies from the right or the creationist we want to get rid of Darwin and his theory of creationism I mean, obviously we evolution because it goes against the you know, the biblical teachings or the creation or from from God from a God, depending on what group you're talking about. And from the left, they're saying Darwin, they get woke. They say we're

dogs are racist. And this is the root of racism, and they're both right and away, but he just finds itself in a weird spot right now. Well, as I'm reading from the wiki pedia so the term Darwinism actually came, was coined by Adolphus Huxley. Huxley, Huxley, yeah, Huxley's Brave New World. Yeah, okay. Yeah. So it's interesting, because, yeah, they wanted to separate Darwin from Darwinism, but it kind of it had already been done. Or he didn't, he didn't really create it. Let me see.

Yeah, but in the castle culture. With the castle culture, if you hit Darwin with the castle cannon, then bed theory go might go down with it. And it's on shaky ground. Anyway, from my standpoint, my bias standpoint, let me be very clear, me being a believer that a higher being created me and all the human race. It's a hard sell now to think that we crawled about a

slum. Of course, the more we understand about humans, right, and the complexity of how of just the human body and everything that will have to evolve from coming from one organism, and let's be clear, that's a very unscientific take on it. But I'm just telling you how is kind of fair through popular science in pop culture. Sure. So I mean, so yeah, he's

on he's on very shaky ground. So they have to be very protective, over Mr. Charles Darwin, when you start peeling and pulling back the layers, it's like, oh, where this where that racist idea comes from or stems from or could have been weaponized. I mean, let's just be you know, we always like to humanize people. In some cases, it might be people that are actually just using and weaponizing his ideas to push a certain narrative.

Absolutely. Then this, and this is so obvious, but so undiscussed I'm so happy we're doing this. Yeah, they don't want to really No, good reason. Cuz, once again, if you get those left and right enemies to find some common ground, he really could be taking out a commission

right. So, I guess we can get into to see now, but, but the first part of it, I do think is a falsehood in in plain English, that is to say that if you look at what Darwin actually says about the question of race, and most notably or notoriously, depending on your point of view, in the Descent of Man, he toyed with the idea of race that is he takes he takes seriously the idea that the races of man might be separate in the way that the

the species might first so that subspecies of of of any creature might be and he toyed with that idea and he plays with it and if you take out those sections have have descended man you can you can find in some sense incriminating passages, but having played with it and having toured with the keyword Jackson, he rejects Stop Stop, stop. Okay, so you hear this this this honesty up let's go back to the quote. He this is the thing he toys with

it, you know? This is bedrock. So on future period, not very distant, as measured in centuries, the civilized races of man will also most will almost certainly exterminate, and replace throughout the world, the savage races, I don't know how he defines toys with what this is pretty much and raises as you can get. Let's roll that back a little bit here, a second of any creature might be, and he toys with that idea that he plays with it. And if you take out those sections,

go back a little further. And it's better here toys with the idea of race that is he takes he takes seriously the idea that the races of men might be separate in the way that the, the species might first so that subspecies of, of, of any creature might be, and he toys with that idea. And he plays with it. And if you take out those sections of of Descent of Man, you can you can find, in some sense, incriminating passages.

Only if you really study it very closely, don't read the words as a whole or anything. Yeah, if you take them on face value, he means it's terminate, um, you, you can squint and see it, but it's really hard to see really hard but having played with it, and having toured with the keyword Jackson, he rejects it quite explicitly, he rejects it on two grounds when he rejects it on the ground, it seems to me at

least, that there's no evidence for it. That is to say that, as far as you can tell, by any rational standard, all human beings belong to a single race, they made to breed they have all the characteristics of a race, they all have essentially the same mental powers, and they all have essentially the same abilities. He also believed that, that the key human capacity, the human key human gift, is sympathy. And he and he

talks about that a great deal. He says sympathy is probably evolved for some useful social reason, because it enables a group of HomoSapiens to have a competitive advantage over some other group, they're used to working together, they they like each other, they get engaged. But then he says very beautifully. But once you have simply there's nothing to limit your application of it. There's nothing that prevents you from expanding it as you like, to whatever social group you choose to.

The sympathy thing. Yeah. And the way I see that translating into modern thought, and this is why I say the left can be more racist than the right because on the right, the people that subscribe to this ideology to say, oh, yeah, you're black. You know, you black people are dumber, or whatever. They honestly believe that. And I can respect their honesty at least even though they're incorrect. Well, I can respect their honesty. But the way the left comes at it is, yeah, we're no,

you're dumb. But we have sympathy for you know, that's why we need to have these and then fill in the blank all these special programs to level the playing field. Because they think is nature. This is not my believe it is nurture. That's really deeply ingrained what you just said they're very, very, very much so. So that's that's the that's kind of the root of it. Interesting. Yeah. This is math is racist. These days. Right? Right. Oh,

man. They're so dumb, we need to have more than one right answer to two plus two. So that's what that's what they lobby for. I don't know if they're conscious of it. I would assume so. at some levels. I mean, of course, people get indoctrinated into beliefs. But okay. I'm just Do you remember? Do you know what this is interesting?

Do you remember the story I told this one is was one of our oshit moments, the story about the black family that visited us and I was like six years old, and we were in, in Maryland. And they were all dressed up he the boy in a suit and the girl and a little frock and everything. And, you know, it seemed way overdressed for the occasion. And they were kind of timid. And I told you that, you know, well, I think we discovered that we were both like fucked up by our parents about what was coming.

And they had told us how to behave. And it was just, it made no sense for a bunch of kids, right. But I remember specifically, looking at them. This is very weird to say, and feeling sorry. And I can't explain why. But I remember that feeling. And I didn't understand it. And now, it seems like that was something that was inherently kind of baked into the culture that I was raised in. Not that I don't think any of my family are racist, but that fee Feeling right there. I remember that.

That's the dangers of lower expectations of vicked embracing and victimization mentality I was, I was six Mo, I was six. That was early on this, this system is ingrained in the images that we see through the media, the television roles that we see the movies like, like it's always some white savior coming to the poor school to save my mind you this was 1969 Okay, so um, just to give you some

context as to what the world was like, right back then. So and I don't think I got this from my parents per se, but from media, television, everything that I that I was exposed to at this time. Right. And this is the problem with the actual this take a little sidebar, I quit this is that was that was kind of hard for me to admit, by the way. That was that was fucked up. How did I Well, that's just just to have another honest moment without closing the door.

I mean, is that on the other side? Preparing for the show word, whatever. It's a it's a, it's not a huge thought. But it is a thought to say, oh, I need to pronounce this right. Because I can be discredited. At any moment. Yeah, sure. Sure. I feel Yeah, I feel that kind of thing. And I'm gonna go ahead and open we'll go and do a quick review. This is that different thing once people get to know

you, they all your different. Different from what Yeah. You see, like, most most not your typical black guy. Right. Exactly. all He's different. He's people that badass them battling the images that were created. And I believe it systems to systemically done to maintain this system of white supremacy and you're hearing it through Adam Gopnik? Yeah, we have to protect Darwin, even though we have his words right

now. No, no, you don't understand. And that's the other thing that I always say, when people say, Oh, you just don't understand. Oh, it's like, I think I understand quite clearly. So about affirmative action, I'm gonna say right, quick, this is the issue, when you say that we can perform less and get in. This only feeds that narrative, that narrative, because I experienced it when you work in corporate America. It's like, Oh, how'd you get here, you know, kind of thing.

And it's a whole thing with imposter syndrome. We'll go down that rabbit hole another day. But yeah, this is now your store CV? I'm glad you admitted that, because that just speaks to, and I'm glad I admitted what I said. Yes. The speaks to the is the Well, the difference is I felt that when I was six, you felt that maybe this week. Right? But it's you feel it when it's not because I feel it is because how I could be perceived. And that goes back to

the double consciousness of a negro that I can see. I know how I feel about it, but I know how others can feel about how I feel about it. I mean, it's it's, it's a huge calculation going on. But let's go ahead and jump on. Tiring mo this tiring. Like I got to always think about and by the way, I don't know if you have to, but you do. So you feel like you have to always think about that. Because XYZ you'll be perceived and maybe you won't, but but that doesn't

matter. You feel like you have to do that. It's not that I feel like it's that's what I say it's not a persistent thought. It crosses your mind and then you had to stamp it out. Like you know, I'm sure of what I'm doing. I know what I'm doing here and that but that constant battle. It just has a rodeo old programming. Really Alright, embedded programming. Okay, man. Now just just to make one more thing since we're here at this point. Now imagine you just say how tiring is now

imagine liberal thinking people. They live in that space. Oh, no wonder they're hysterical. Crazy. No wonder drives you crazy on both sides. One. If you actually think you live in that, or if you perceive this will be white liberals perceiving black people living in that space. I gotta, I gotta tell you another story. This is my stepdaughter, the younger one. And now she's come around a lot. She's been living in New York for goodness, almost two years.

And she's come around a lot. And I'm very, very proud of her. But we were she was Visiting a year and a half ago, maybe here in the hill country. And we were at our one of our favorite restaurants. And I know all the all the waitstaff there. And this is one, one server black guy, and he was interesting. He had his baseball cap on and he had kind of those the small dreads. And then I said, Holy crap, man, it looks just like

Snoop Dogg, which he did. He looks like it all it was missing was, you know, the, the wraparound sunglasses data, data data. I mean, it was totally right. And she got up and left the restaurant because she believed 100% that I was just being completely racist, saying there's a black guy must be Snoop Dogg. And I and I acknowledge Him there have familiar appearances, when he heard and this is what this is the thing about being what's being said,

and what's being heard. And this is gonna be I'm glad you brought that up. Because that's gonna be a sub sub running theme of this show. Are we saying that black people are dumb, all black people? Are we saying they're a higher percentage of dumb people in the black? Race? He's gonna say it like what you're saying. Now, you said they look like was she? I'm not putting words in my mouth. But it leads to that all black people look alike to you, dad.

It was really bizarre. But I guess what I was saying was that she has these props or had had, it's really changed. I'm so proud of her. She had these processes running all the time. Oh, every day always like trolling. Is there something racist? Is it something racist, something racism, but then the reason why that process is running is perhaps something much differently. It's actually a misplaced compassion. It's really weird. Sympathy, sympathy. Right? Exactly. Yeah,

that's the that sympathy that we speak of. It's like I say, it's very tiring. And I think that's the great part of the show that you can kind of take some of that baggage off on both sides, and like kind of like, Hey, this is what this is what I see this what you see, and we talk about it, and it can be put to rest. And then you know, the producers get to hear that as well. Yeah, well, we, we saw this one onward. Right. Now we're gonna get into the genocide, the

horror of scientific racism. Darwin also predicted that in the future, the civilized races of mankind would exterminate the inferior ones. Darwin himself was ambivalent about some of the social implications of his theory. But in Germany, Darwin's ideas supplied a new generation of political leaders, social thinkers, and scientists with what they regarded as a biological justification for world domination.

If you read the scientists of the day, in the late 19th, and early 20th century, many of them were promoting racism and even racial extermination extinction of races. They were promoting the gaining of living space, they were promoting competition, the things that we know of is social Darwinism. These were things being promoted by Charles Darwin himself to some degree. Many other leading biologists know you don't say

the one word I want to focus on this whole clip is Exterminate. Because that's that's an interesting word to use. Yeah, more commonly used with bugs or paths. Yeah, bugs. Yeah, right and just from the wetlands. Merriam Webster is means to destroy completely. And similar words, let's see I had similar words here. Okay to similar words is abolish, annihilate blackout, blot out Council clean up. Eradicate, erase, expand, liquidate, obliterate root out, rub out, snuff out, stamp out,

sweep away and wipe out. Yeah. Sounds groovy all of it. But he just toyed with he only only just a little toying around. It was really was just just juvenile stuff. But just in fairness, people took the the idea and this is how dangerous ideas can be. When they're weaponized. The Germans they took it and ran with it. Um, you you want to say before we move on? Well, I should say that the Germans they took it from the Americans they were Hitler in particular was a big fan of some of the

American eugenicist, wrote them fan letters even. And then when when Germany started going a little hard and heavy, like you know, in the US people were talking about forced sterilization in Germany was like, hey, you know what, I think gas chambers are good. That's when everyone got really quiet here. The Genesis the eugenics movement, right? Because they had to distance themselves. Yeah, that was that we'd already had that conversation America and was like Nana, that's kind

of lame. Let's not do that. Well, but not out of any sane, benevolent, you know, feeling. You're gonna you're gonna blow this scheme right here keep doing this on bra Street. Yeah. So once again, is that, oh, we're helping you by sterilizing you, we're helping you by eugenics kind of thing that sympathy. They actually think they're doing the right thing. And we have to be clear, these

people are lizards. And thinking with the lizard brain, they're thinking, if we let the savage races continue to procreate, there won't be any space for us. So it's either fight or flight. And I want people to see that through this lens. If only to understand to counteract it, you know, these people are acting out of fear. It's not power, they act out of fear.

Well, no, they've acted out of fear. And through that they've created huge power structures based on that fear, which in my mind, I'm seeing it so much clearer now is in fact, the pharmaceutical industry, the food industry, and you got the bankers running around, taking advantage of it, the whole system of institutions, kind of feels like it's set up to make to remove people from the planet. Slowly. And it's not one race. It's it's everybody slowly.

Yeah, they have different criteria. And that's the thing and, um, but but they know who needs to go first. Like I said, We'd always come to a nice, Savage Race thing. We got to get them out of the way first, and then we'll once we get that down to 10%, then we will do the 10% of the 10% It won't stop. I mean, they're always continuously improving. So that's the thing I would never start with these people until there's only a handful of quote unquote Gods on the earth

500 million 500 million Georgia Guidestones. That's that's their that's their their guiding light. And I don't think it will stop there. I just think that's the first 10% Okay, now we got down to 500 million. Sure. Now, it needs to be 50 million, you know, and they'll continue on with their process. Let's see, we stopped there for two Yeah, okay, let's go there. The war of annihilation is a natural law, without which the organic world could not continue to exist at all. Germans who

ologists Gustave agar ating 70. Just as in nature, the struggle for existence is the moving principle of evolution and perfection. So also in world history, the destruction of the weaker nations through the stronger is a postulate of progress. German ethnologist, Friedrich Hal veiled, 1875, according to Darwin's theory, wars have always been of the greatest importance for the general progress of the human

species. The physically weaker, the less intelligent, the morally lower, must give place to the stronger German biologist, Heinrich Ziegler, at 93. Yeah, they were all over that. Yeah, so I missed that setup. But that's yes, quotes for scientists that Darwinism influenced. And you can see they just took it to another level. And that you hear him start speaking about intelligence and moral composition as being

criteria for for eliminating people. So but there is some down sod eugenics in their eyes, even in the leaders eyes there because it can, you know, well, let's go and get number five. Not all German Darwinists defended war as a biological imperative. Some, in fact criticized it for undermining natural selection. They feared that wars in Europe would kill

off too many of the superior races. Yet even these pacifist Darwinists tended to approve of wars raged against races they considered lower on the evolutionary scale like the native peoples of Africa yeah door or brown people in deserts we still do that. Right or brown people in you know, south of the border or wherever I mean, like, but you heard him say it well, we kill them out too many around, you know, these world wars or whatnot?

Yes, no good. Yeah, we got to keep some of our own people going. Right, because you it's the balance there, that you have to increase the civil civilized races while suppressing the numbers of the savage races. But when you have these world wards,

it kind of has an ill effect on the civilized races as well. I'm gonna take this as a quick aside and just say what I'm seeing in the world right now. And I just had an epiphany. I was talking to girl one one day, and you know, we just go go back and forth. And it was just like it had no, it just popped in my head. Are we and I say we, the Western ideology, white supremacy. Because I live in America. So I'm part of that loading up on soldiers. Because I keep hearing this mean,

military aged men coming across the border. Military age men coming across the border, military age men flooding into Europe. Oh, oh, we know, because I pay my taxes to the United States government. Are we loading up on soldiers that we sorely miss? Hmm. I don't know that. That's an interesting thought. Like you like that citizenship. You like living in the country? Yeah. Well, there is a path for if you come in illegally, there's a path for

you to go to military and to become a citizen. I believe that still exists. Exactly. And we saw this same thing. We saw mass emigration from Europe. Then we saw two world wars. Yes, that's right. That continues that continues to this day here and in Europe. Right. So I just want people to pay attention. Like why? Yeah. And the term military age mean military age. And now that could be double used as to scare people. Yeah. Oh, potential terrorists or something of that nature.

Right. But also in my book, it could be the old like, foreshadowing like, Oh, we got soldiers right here. How convenient, you know, to protect Europe. And would they fight that? I mean, that's, that's the question. But that's, like I said, that's another story for another day when I when I saw that I was like, and it kind of rolled I was like home. You have all these extra guys around. And you see what's happening on the global front. I mean, with China, Russia and whatever else.

Are these bodies for the military? Because I don't want to go too far down that rabbit hole. But this is how sophisticated is one world system is very possible. No. I don't see any evidence of it yet. Yeah, we'll have to put like I say, I just want to lay this when I have these thoughts. It just too convenient. Don't Don't be a Neely. Fuller say don't be confused. They're confused. Right? Open. Yeah. That's for sure. There's this another shooter dropped with that one.

But with that said, I think that was number five. Now we're gonna jump on over. This is a dangerous. This is Lipsy. Yeah,

I got it. This is a documentary is called a dangerous idea, the history of Eugenics in America. And this is from the National Constitution Center. And let's go on and get into Part One of it. My interest in eugenics certainly comes in part, from the experience of myself being a refugee from from Hitler, and being keenly aware of what was done in the name of science and

specifically in the name of genetics. But that happened in this country as well, of course, in a certain sense, the Nazis imported from the United States which had a flourishing eugenics movement. At the turn of the 20th century, eugenics was widely accepted in the United States as solid science among the country's top psychologists, scientists, politicians and social thinkers.

During this first Gilded Age, it was the creation of the gene concept itself that ignited what became a powerful eugenics movement. So one reason that the eugenics movement was so influential at the time was because it provided a scientific solution or a supposedly scientific so solution to a political problem. No science. Yes. Believe in the Science Trust the science, it's okay. It's just science is the scientific solution. I love it to a political problem.

And it doesn't stop. I mean, we see that even to this day. Eat bugs, that's a scientific solution. Yes, it is to a political problem of homelessness. I mean, in this is just how they use their religion or science to justify actions that will be seen as counter to being human. You know, just the human sense of like, you can't kill off people. I mean, you can't put people in gas chambers. You can't sterilize people. You can't give people blankets with smallpox. And, you

know, you can't release a bio weapon. amongst the masses. You can't release an untested vaccine and witness the masses isn't Oh, what is the scientific solution to a political problem? Yeah, it's justified. So isn't that the American Nazis man, like airtime? Like people want to say, oh, and it's convenient. And we'll see a little later and show how so maybe? Have You Ever Have you ever watched Man in the High Castle? I have not. I've heard you talk about I've heard a couple other

people talk about it. But yeah, it's it's not about race, but completely about eugenics. Eugenics, it really is a lot of the shows about eugenics. And you know, they've got, I mean, the whole premise of the show is, is interesting. And I'm like, in season three, but it's just something if people want to see how it could have turned out after World War Two, that's something it'd be interesting to

watch that. It's what it finished that statement, how it could have turned out if war if America had not won, if the Germans and the Japanese had beat America? I think they did. And that's kind of the point of Man in the High Castle. When you look at it, you're like, wait a minute, did anything did this not happen? Yeah. You're so right. If it started here, then it's not really not seeing an origin. No. I mean, you look at Henry Ford, and you know, you know,

the people you know, of that ilk. Lindbergh how they put me in Rockefeller and all these people. I mean, they were big time, you know, saying eugenics. And so we have to look at the who actually went now Germany might have lost a war as a country, but the ideology? Yeah, I mean, you look at the Operation Paperclip, they bought or brought over hundreds of Nazis. Right. And Nazi NASA. I mean, it ain't too many letters, all from each other. So, and I like to put some respect on one of the

people that opened my eyes up to this possibility. That's my Brussels or may Brussels. Have you ever heard of her before? No, I have not. You've never heard her maiden name. Super. She's like this super OG truther. That oftentimes you don't hear women truthers, and I use that term very loosely. But people that aspire to finally seek the truth. Not in the pejorative term of truth here but never heard. She was a radio host. Well, she started out by investigating the JFK. Right. I'm looking at

her Wikipedia right now. Right. That's what got her into it. And from there, she found this whole night. Not the kind of self system in the United States government. And she was like, Oh, gee, dang, like podcasts. She was pre podcast. So he's like, she had to mail you tapes. You know, this is how she we had to get I mean, so just to give person respect her name, but this is what opened my eyes to like, hold on, like, shoot, man. I'd never heard of her. How fascinating. And she's

like, she shouldn't be my OG conspiracy therapist. Well, she's dead. Yeah, but if you go back, you can find it. I mean, it's getting harder to find her stuff. But interestingly, you she was sent out and break it now. Like, Oh, this guy came over here. And you know, he was no like, connecting the orange string. And so you know, and it just kind of opened my eyes like, I don't own various Well, I haven't seen a man in the High

Castle. But this predate my my belief. I guess I've been down many rabbit holes when I went down that when I was like, huh, and a TAS of Jim Jones, and that's kind of how I got into her, because she's the one that did a lot of investigation on Jim Jones. See? And that whole thing that went down there were

so um, yeah. So American Nazis we had to really look at this and see that the a lot of that ideology started here went over there got perfected and then they brought the player right back back here and we're like, sheesh, I know if you noticed that all the movies like The evil professors or doctors have like German names. Yes. Oh, yeah, so I guess we can go and move on to the next clip number nine.

The wealthiest families in the country provided millions and research funding to scientists, in an attempt to prove that social problems were primarily a result of defective genetics. At the prestigious Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York, Harry Laughlin, and animal breeder, directed the eugenics record office, he claimed they could predict who would inherit good or bad traits by using a mathematical formula from

Mendel. They were also firm believers in Charles Darwin, who clearly applied his theory of natural selection to human society. You Genesis saw themselves as agents of evolution, doing their duty to ensure that the fittest Americans survived. They said, We have to find a way to have people who are more evolved, make more babies, we have to find a way to have people who were poor, and have all these diseases and all this bad genetic structure produce less.

Laughlin organized exhibits in communities across the country to educate the public about eugenics. Families underwent detailed physical and mental examinations as they competed to win the prize for the best heredity. Yes, yes. I've read about this at family fairs that have tests and so the like town fairs, right, they'll test your blood. Oh, you know, the IQ the IQ test, as we know it today is a derivative of all this bullshit. Goggles curry. I knew. I knew I couldn't get through one show.

I'm sorry. This contract? I'm sorry. I did. I did some jumping ahead. I'm sorry. I did some research a couple of weeks ago. Yeah. So this Genex you heard it right there. Yes. The root of this Genex that and discharges Gen X to remind everybody this Gen X is where if you don't do anything, then the dumb stupid people will breed much faster and take over the world. And it basically, Idiocracy is what we then get. Right? Oh, and they'll eat up all the resources and you have

more takers than givers. Right Saudi in that and you know, in society could collapse under that way. Right. So the agents of evolution have become savers from the from the from the dumb people. Um, that's, that is a bold statement. Now, on the backside of this clip, this is where we're gonna refresh people. This is a merging of two clips from the last show of I think it was William Shockley. Oh, yeah. Shockley. Yeah, the transistor guy. Yeah, cuz he's the one that brought, you know, the modern

term dis Genex. And but you heard it is the idea that less dumb people more smart people. That comes out of, you know, og eugenics? Yeah, I found that I found an interview of William Shockley from the early 70s. With William F. Buckley, Jr. Which apparently was, according to the Vortech was, was the interview that kind of made the public go, You're not You're an idiot. But it was unbelievable. What he was talking about. He was dead serious about this stuff.

And the question is, Is he is he an idiot? No answer that question yet. Let's listen to what he says so people can hear what he said. And let's talk about on the other side. Now, let's find out what the controversy is about Dr. Shockley, please give us the benefit, basically, of what your theory is. My principal point, Mr. Brown is not so much a theory of black white differences. But it's summed up in one word which the theme of my appearance on your program and my efforts, and the

word is dis Genex. And dis Genex means effectively down breeding, retrogressive evolution. And I fear that this is worst for the black community. And I particularly welcome an opportunity to appear on Black Journal just for these reasons. But now let me say this chart that I held up a moment ago, is very important in respect to this question of why I think

There may be what proves the basic difference. But I'm going to say that if there were not a basic difference and intellectual capacity in the past, there probably will be a basic difference between black and white intellectual capacity in the future, simply because of the reproduction patterns. When I say Idiocracy, I'm referring to the movie. Right? I know what you mean. Because because that's basically what happens in Idiocracy. Is all the idiots multiplied. Well, that's right.

It's the pace thing is because it's not only do you have to stop the dome, you have to influence the intelligent to breed. And they're having a harder time with that and might get sad a little later, but it ties into older show as well. But let me ask you a question. And then we're going to take a look at things through the lizard lens. Okay. And you see how, see how the lizard see you? Okay, the question is, what

percentage of people are fit to be parents in America? What percentage of people are fit to be procreate? Well, I guess, to have to defy, define fit? I mean, physically able, or let me use your definition that you say, oh, that's the ideal person to be a parent there. Is feels like a trick question. It's really not, I'm just my number is probably lower. Well, see, I Well, first of all, I believe that everybody who has who has a functioning human being is technically fit to be

parents. I'd say the problem is we have a large population who has grown up askew, so mainly without a father or man in the house. So I'll put the I'll have to put it at 25%, then. Okay, so you're saying 75%? I knew my nobilo are yours minus 20? Yeah, that's about one out of every five people I encounter. I'll be like, You know what, we need more of them in the world. And what reason why I'm doing this we had, we have to look at this through the lizard lens. When they ask that

ask themselves that question. Instead, say, Okay, we're looking at the society. Let's just use your number one out of every four people are fit to be parents. Okay. What do we do with the three out of four? sterilize them, shoot them to Mars, get rid of them? Right? starve them, get them out of universal basic income? Right, tricking them into giving up their fertility in some kind of way. Scare them through global warming and their impact on the planet. You know

what, we have to take action? Because we can't, we're using your percentage. And they're in their thought process to say, Okay, we can't let three out of four procreate? No. So what do we do? We castrate them? Either, you know, the whole track child trans movement? Oh, yeah, that's, that's I completely agree. That's sterilization of weak brothers and sisters who? Who accepted this dumb programming in the first place? And it's not the child? No, it's the parent is like, the ones

pushing it exactly. Right, which they look at and say, Hold on, if those two people create it, and allow this to happen to their child, they don't need any more children. With you that this is the thinking mode. I've thought this

ever since we started going down this rabbit hole. That's why I keep coming up with and just fast forward that to every scenario that's in the news of NES, how you look at is like three out of four, you know, they say they have, you know, three out of five, or whatever the number is, I mean, the other the remainder, we have to take action, we can't be inactive. And as we tried to

educate them, we gave them the internet. We gave them the information age, we gave them billions of dollars, trillions of dollars in free money for education. And this is what we got for our investment. Of course, I'm speaking from the lizard perspective. But this is what we got for our investment we gave you you know, interesting, the world's library. We gave you abilities to learn and do anything possible. Right? And you want to play Angry Birds and candy crush

all day. Yeah, you gotta go. Yeah. And I asked, the reason why I do this is just to humanize not even to defend them, but to say okay, if you see that as your enemy or you're a combatant You have to seek first to understand, you have to understand their mentality of if you're not value added to society, you have to go and it's very cold and callous. But I believe that's their standpoint.

I think you're right. I think you're right at a high level and and it's a small group of people who drive it, but it's so ingrained in our culture that's knit everything you notice everybody has to my dumber than them. If you ever noticed that, you know, I look at that dummy, you know, that kind of thing, we have a look downward kind of mentality. So we don't care about what happens to people under, you know, um,

and that plays right into the losers hand as well. So I guess let's go ahead and move to the third part of this clip, number

10. But you Genesis disagreed on what should be done with people they considered unfit. Some argue that less a fair economic policies might be severe enough to eliminate so called defectives from the gene pool. society should not coddle in any way, the poor, don't help them.

Don't help them through charity. Don't help them through legislation that you see if you help them according to the social Darwinists, you would only enable them to reproduce more of them, society would be better off if we instituted survival of the fittest, we would get stronger just as species become stronger when their weakest members die off and their strongest members live on to reproduce. But it would take decades before this social Darwinian approach

would be effective. So many new Genesis considered a quicker solution, one that would eventually be used by the Nazis, euthanasia. Some called for outright execution of the unfit, as well as lethal neglect of newborns they considered defective. But in the end, they agreed that euthanasia would be used at two deer a moral price. Sterilization was the favorite alternative. Biologist Harry Laughlin wrote the Model law that North Carolina eventually used to sterilize Elaine Riddick.

Okay, we have a famous case here. Yes. So as you spoke and said that euthanasia we can't do that it is bad for business. So what can we do? Well, they already here. So we just got to stop them from procreating and enter sterilization and the legalization of sterilization. But you heard they ask the question. So what should be done with the unfit? Yeah. Which, if we're honest, be completely honest. Some people who may not be the best people to procreate?

But on the other hand, that's a slippery slope, because then who starts to set the standard? No, that's always going to be the slippery slope. Of course. That's why you can't even though I understand the letters I get it, is, you can't start that. Because if you start that, then how do you stop it? You know, where does it go from? Okay, we'll do the people when they start not cute. And then becomes Oh, well, well, I'm not financially ready.

Oh, silly. I'll say it. But it seems obvious to me what they did. Let's systematically kill them with with processed food. Now, it kills everybody except the people in the know. I think that that's the that's the path they chose to like, Okay, we're gonna have all kinds of different quality food which most people will not eat, that'll make them weak. It's possible that certain viruses etc, were introduced.

Looking at the viruses and who they attack and who there is, you know, if you're, if you're married in a monogamous relationship, monkey pox is not a real threat to you. A's wasn't a real threat to you. Other than like, blank blood transfusions or something crazy like that, but look at the diseases look at their behaviors when it came to how they did the old people in rest homes, bringing, you know, Cuf patients in there that was

that was my best one. Yeah, no, that was obvious that that was a kill shot of the own fat. Yeah. You know, and they're just gonna keep ratcheting it down. And now it's That's the beautiful thing is you get a population, which in the United States, I think some crazy number like 46% of all Americans are obese Friday 46%. So, you know, and notice what we didn't get with. With two years of poof, we didn't get anyone saying, here's some things you can do to strengthen your immune

system. Here's some very simple things you can take. Here's some simple exercises, you could none of that. Because jails were closed. Yes, he was only physical health the churches were closed. So mental health is like everything was was geared up to have the weakest die off. You locked me in my house? Only fast food is essential. Yeah, use it use the wet, don't be confused. They're confused when

you start to look at these things. And like actually, yeah, they started to crystallize is like, holy crap, I'm with you. They are legit trying to take us I when I say us, the general population. Now if you have willpower, they say Oh, you'll be fine Mo, or you'll be fine out, um, you know, to eat or, you know, to exercise or? Well, I mean, whatever it is. You live in Europe, you don't need heating this winter, you

don't have any air conditioning, you'll be okay. Just turned out just take shorter showers. Right waves, it is bizarre, that they're actually in favor of the people they demonize, right. Cuz like, if you look at it conservative, quote, unquote, textbook, conservative family, the ones that are prepping and, you know, having children in a planned way, you know, we had to go back to that this plan, the ones who are doing the Planned Parenthood method of planning

out, you know, procreation. That's who we won't, and they're not going to fall for our tricks, you know, and they're, and there'll be fine. Just not saying anything, while we eradicate the old dumb and the sad. Yeah, it's true. It's very sick. I mean, sick, but it's so obvious. It's very obvious. And now you have to go back and say, who actually won that war and audiology was not military or

military wise or whatever else? And you have to say, Well, if we taught them and we mean, we beat them either way, we would have one that's playing books. That's playing both sides of the war. And it's the same enemies. It's now it's the same, it's the same enemies. True, as now because my little Germany's on Sr. Japan's on our side, how convenient. And now we're battling Russia. Wow. I'm 11.

In 1927, the Supreme Court upheld Harry lofrans Model law and ruled eight to one that the Constitution permitted US citizens to be forcibly sterilized. Congress never passed a federal sterilization law. But it's estimated that by the end of World War Two under state laws, at least 80,000 Americans had been forced to undergo hysterectomy, Tubal ligation, vasectomies and castration. There was only in 1933, after the Nazis took over the Germany

had any eugenic laws at all. The first law they passed was for the heredity of future generations. And that was their sterilization law. And they modeled it on Lofland Model law. In fact, they were so grateful to Loughlin for his leadership in this area that they gave him an honorary medical degree from Heidelberg in 1936. For research on purifying the germ plasm other human population.

Laughlin was an enthusiastic supporter of the third rash, the eugenics news, which Lofland edited trust fond over Germany, and its progressive policies. And in fact, there was a certain envy Germany's getting too far ahead of us in applying the conclusions of science to the structure of society. Now there's something we have to consider with this. Intuitively a you and I are on the same page, but has there ever been a

Have they ever played out the theory all the way through? Have they ever looked at a microcosm of a community or country and said, Okay, let's not kill any of these people? Let's see what happens. Let's see if if indeed dis Genex happens. Is there any example of that? Or is it just as a given and we're just all in this just sheer numbers. Like you'd like we just did the study. It was like the unofficial study of if one out of every four people are all three out Every four people are

unfit to procreate. They gotta go. We can't run that risk. They got to overrun us. Well, and as, and can we, as Adam and Mo, can we run that risk that we have a bunch of blithering idiots running around? Is it mean that we had to take a real look at this and say, what the problem is? Is there some solutions that are still humanizing and honest to say to people, Hey, this is what's

gonna happen. This is what we think this is why I said, this is why respect the people that are honest to say, Hey, this is why I think I think you're an idiot. How much would it take for you to give up your facility? Right? Yeah. And right, that a person that, at least me, well, at least they know what they're getting into, that was shock, Lee's entire idea. Shockley was talked about

the sterilization bonus. And he wanted to be a federal government program that you would receive, he had, he had the numbers broken down, depending on what type of what you did. But if you if you got a vasectomy, or if you were sterilized, then they would put $30,000 into an escrow account for you. And you know, that would actually take care of your living and compound interest. Of course, this was the 70. So it's a different interest to scenario. And that would base it

was like universal base. There you go. Universal Basic Income, if you get goggles, goggles, goggles. Okay, all right. I got there. I got there. All right. Are you willing to give up your because if you're on the government's team, you can't be having babies? Well, right now, it's, of course, the opposite is true is you know, the the government gives you lots of money for your babies, which is part of the welfare issue. Right, but they say I will give you whatever a mother forget

not to have children not to have children, but a bonanza. Great idea. And that's why I see it coming. Because it's kind of like one of those situations with every employee needs 15 All the hour, right? That was the, yeah, let's do this. So we can justify automation and put them out of a job. Right? It's the same thing with UBI. It's like, Oh, you want to stay at home and find your true self and meaning in the world.

Now, I mean, think about the beautiful scenario, if you have people on UBI, you have a central bank, digital currency, so you control where they can spend, you can really control the economy in a very fine tuned way, you can make sure that if you believe in monetary, modern monetary theory that you can keep printing money forever, which clearly the central banks do, then you can you know, then you have your built in

consumers. And you can determine who is successful by steering the consumers based upon access they can or cannot have with the money that you control. Oh, this is kind of a dynamite plan. Now to think about it. And this is 2.0. Because this is what welfare was about the first time around, right? And no man in the house, it was, Okay, keep

the seed spreader away. And we'll give you the apartments were nice when they first build built, you know, they weren't projects right off the bat, it was okay, we'll give you a nice apartment. And we'll give you food stamps, which is basically the same thing. You we give you money, that you're limited how

you can spend it. So what you're saying with the, you know, the digital currency, so I mean, you can't you can't buy this, you can't buy hot food, you're the Cabal, you know, saying blah, blah, anything, if they really want to help your society, they can make it where your food stamps, or EBT card will only

work for healthy food. But it's the complete opposite. Well, even though some of that they tried to implement but you know, the, the black market for for selling and trading your EBT card for drugs and other things is I mean, you can't it's hard to combat that. In its current form. norms. What I'm saying is they can trust me. They had a rule where you couldn't buy hot food. Why can't you not buy junk food? Why can't you not buy soda pop? Why can't you not buy? You know,

Little Debbie and he's earthy? Because it's against the corporate interests of the of the corporation? No, they want you fat? Yes. Early. You're right, you're right. I'm gonna tell you how. snack cakes are subsidized in some kind of way. And fast food is Well, notice hamburgers are still $1 Now when we're ramping inflation and of course I know they're probably doing something on the ingredient side. But they make sure fast food is always accessible to the poor. Where

the price point and in location Yeah. And that's to get you about here as fast as possible. Yep, I see it. I see it clearly. America is not racist. We just we just want to kill most people. Not even America is the one we're going world government. Yeah. II white supremacy by nearly fuller definition. Because we see Darwin what they mean by that now. It's like the civilized races. We need to. That's what that's all about.

And if you can, even if you're not, quote unquote, white, if you appeal to that monster, you're gonna, you're in, you're good. You're good to go. Yeah, and that's why you won't hear people in the mainstream media speak up against it. Because they don't want to lose their spot. They want to lose their credentials or their you know, our you know, their degrees or whatnot. You know, that's why they keep silent. Yep. All right. So now just

so sick, it's sick, it's sick, I tell you, it's sick. And just to prove that both sides are being controlled. Oh, now we're gonna jump over this is Anthony Cecil Sutton. And he was he taught economics at California State, and was a

research fellow at Stanford University. So he's well credentialed, you know, I mean, like, from the from the higher up, so we have, you know, take his word with some credibility, but he's gonna draw a connection between Western corporates, eight corporate corporations and the Nazis. Once we can agree upon a capitalist communist conspiracy, then we have to study the nature of the power elite, and the super rich, and the people who have the feeling that they

control the planet and that we belong to them. And we are used by them to their ends. But this is a type of person who has no national loyalties. Who is capable of running large corporations and starting wars, using wars, for effecting change, and so forth. If you look through history, you can identify these figures and you can identify them today. So to me, all of that makes sense. Okay, who was the speaking? Oh, that was she's this the interviewer she did like this

preamble before she started, okay. And she's just saying what she, how she saw his work and how to be described. So I should have explained that a little bit better. But basically, they own you. They aren't and I had to be honest, one of the first appealing things and was slightly Sure. I don't want to use word triggering, but it kind of raised my antennas. When I first listened to no agenda when you got to the Shut up slave

segment. Because of the the programming programming is like shut up slave like well, we consider everyone to be a slave of Gitmo nation. That was what was appealing about it. Well, I'm just showing you carrying something then processing and realize, oh, you all get it. Yeah, we're all slaves. Yes. Yes. That's the charm about it. What are the many times about the show? That the lizard people like I said, You have me Hey, we're good to

go. I really I hooked you and reeled you in didn't I got you good. Cuz it's, they own us now? Is that a no, forever? No, but we're complicit in our own ownership. Cuz we, we give these corporations our money, and then they give us back these programs. Yeah. Now, of course, meaning you can live a great life one if we push their narrative, or embraced it, or even just shut up, you know? It's like, yeah, just

just shut up, shut up and go along with the program. You can, you can be very successful that way. You're good. I mean, because you're, you're you're intelligent, you know, you don't have any skin in the game. I I remember going back to the Netherlands, end of 1999. And,

you know, I had taken a company public I clearly had done well. And very quickly, I was invited into the elite parties, you know, with politicians and people who are big in industry and yeah, it was like weird stuff like fashion shows, etc. And I noticed that they were all kind of like, Hey, this is a hot new dude. Let's see. What's What's he got going on? How can we use him and they quickly found out that I was not to be Manipur. Ladies and I really was not interested. And I got kicked

out of every group uninvited never happened again. So they are the most dangerous. Yes, yes. Because if you understand it, don't go along with it. And this goes back to that 585 510 85 thing that they think 85% Of People are sheep. Right. And it's in the Five Percenters believe it's a it's a belief

system that was popularized by the Wu Tang Clan. But I mean, it was way but is this the way before them? And it's basically 85% of the people are sheep 10% of the people who know what's going on, but that split the sheep, within 5% of the people know what's going on. And they seek to help the 85 to see what's going on. Right? Right. Like they tried to get you in the team, which another term for the Boulay is the talented 10. Talented Tim that's what they're called.

Talented, talented. 10th talented? Yes. I'd never heard of that. Yes, that was the one. And this is where that thing comes in to say, Oh, they're not all of them. Some are different. Yeah. So then that's when they come in and start to get you in the gifted programs. And we're out you out away from the trick baby thing. Right, right. We can't let them be free agents out here. We got to rope them in. And I think you were kind of going going through that same process of Oh, you're very

influential. We need to have you on our team. Oh, you don't want to be on our team? Oh, you get that Alex Jones treatment. That bottom is feeling like baby. Because it's you can't now that we know that, you know, we it's kind of like the bank robber. Right. Right. It's like, once you see my face, I got to kill you now. So yeah, this is his man is wow. It is when you say it when you see it. So clearly. It really is. I think when we come and laugh about it and market, it helps.

Well, but also what's really interesting is how it really is covered up by this universal racism thing. Right? So the cover up is oh, all white Trump voters are the problem in America. They're the racist. They're super racist. They're Uber racist. They're not even worth talking about. They're so racist. And listen how the conversation goes. Because in this is a demographic they started using. I don't know how recent it was, you wouldn't know better to me because you cover like the

political news in very detail. But this and this, where they call it non college educated voter. Yeah. That really started being a Democrat demographic, you know, yeah. Well, that really ratcheted up with Trump. I mean, it's always been there. It's been there. I remembered from Bush years. Actually, during Obama, and probably is when it really started to ramp up. You didn't vote for Obama racist. You don't like Obama racist, you're racist. And you

know why, though, because they haven't been the college. Yes, that's, that's the that's a clear indicator. So I'm just showing you how they put it right out on front street in front of your face when they use the demographics like, oh, yeah, college educated voters. And this is where, in the 2020 election, a plush pressure was applied to the moderates to say, you don't want to be like a dumb Trump voters do Oh, no. No,

those troglodytes. You know, that kind of that kind of thing is like, whoa, accelerated fast Neanderthals throwing all the big words around. During that whole time, so yeah, they they're right on frustrated with it. So now we get to get to Mr. Anthony Sutton and clip, the next clip, part two.

So you've just made a rather shocking statement. And that statement is that American or international capitalist, as I call them, because they don't have any American loyalties would prefer to have socialist and communist captive states so that they can have captive markets. Yes, these people are not American, that internationalists and they're part of being internationalist in the private

conversation. And you just gave a quotation which I found in the State Department files from William Saunders, Chairman of Ingersoll Rand, saying he thinks that Soviet communism the best form of government have the best form of government for the Soviet Union. When you talk to these gentlemen, there's no

question The they want power. And the power and the political sense equates to socialism, whether you call it national socialism or the Bolshevik socialism doesn't really matter when you get centralized power, centralized political control. That is what these internationalist gentlemen want. They do not believe, as I've seen them in the American way,

the Constitution of the United States. They don't believe in personal liberty for you and I. And I was talking to a gentleman today who had worked in one of these corporate structures, and he remarked how it was just like, a little socialist state where people are numbered. They perform numbered actions. They're little cogs in the wheel. That is what these gentlemen want. Oh, yeah. The dream. Right. That's what that's what the meta verse is going to be.

And just to give you some personal perspective about this, that I've gone through this after leaving corporate America when I went to work in corporate America, I dress nice, right? I mean, because I had to go to work, you know, and I'm a nice dress, you know, naturally. Um, wow, that's really presumptuous. You know, what I mean? is like, I mean, like, I'm, like, even amongst my peers, you know, I like to drink look myself, but I

will come from work, and people would see you differently. Now that I'm new in my new business, right, you know, you're not dressed up the way you wear shorts, t shirt, you know, they look at you differently. Um, and it's just jarring, right? You know, kind of like they look past you. It doesn't bother me. But of course, I'll take notice to everything. Now, when you say for when you say they obviously, it's not the same people you were interacting with before? Because you left

the corporation. Do you mean talk about outside of work? Just when I'm going? I was going home from work, and I stopped by the store. See, that? Was that different appearance? Oh, you're dim dress nice. You're so so presentable. I'll speak to you. Boy, it wasn't a Joe Biden, who said about Barack Obama that he was saying, Well spoken. I don't remember him saying clean, but as you say, clean.

You might be right. You might be right. She was she was one of the ones on her left there say he was clean. He might not have been Joe Biden. But that was one of the attributes later. That was linked to Obama. Well, yeah, it was, um, you looking it up? Yeah. Obviously. I was trying to see if I had a clip of that. I don't Okay, I don't think now I'm gonna say what he did speak to his being different. This is Yes, I agree to that point, that Barack Obama was different in

some way. So I'm gonna just say staining that. Just how society we all have this looking down mentality, right? You know, we're looking for somebody to look down on to feel better, which plays great into the hand of what grants and everything. It could be narcissism, whatever else how you want to call it. So. Alright, let's see, I think we started to 13. Let's go to 14. They also supported Hitler, the very same people. So they

support the left, they support the right. So you go back to the Hungarian dialectic thesis versus antithesis gives you a synthesis. If they want a synthesis of new world order, they will get conflict, conflict between apart left apart, right. That might be another reason that the captors want captive markets. They don't want to see the Soviet Union as another free

enterprise free society. And this is still the freest society in the world and United States. So they they do these countries, whether it be the Soviet Union in 1917, or Nicaragua today, they do in these countries to Marxist dictatorship, so that they can be controlled from the economic and the political and financial viewpoint through what I see is the coming New World Order, the second new world so maybe a combination of patience and as a deliberate creation of conflict within this bar.

Oh, man, we're well on our way. Oh, yeah, we're deep navy right road ahead and they're fast, fast track. But just to go back to the Obama statement is the story I'm seeing in Biden's description Obama draws scrutiny. Biden called Obama first clean African American candidate. What a dope, which, which I think we played even more than him using poor Joe. I didn't like I gotta call them for Joe, ischemia, he's running with a third term he's like, Yeah, claim, huh? Yeah, well spoken.

Talk for me, Joe, talk for me. All right, monkey boy. So you hear so you hear what? We had it on the right road, and I just played those static clips to show even in this eugenics, whatever else. I think they're playing both sides. And one of

the things I want people to be cautious of now that Roe v Wade has been struck down as unconstitutional. I have a question. Can sterilization be made illegal on the state level? For sterilization, or just sterilization?

sterilization? Yes. I don't any you have no recourse. It sounds like because like, we don't hear we're Oh, if Roe was not meant to write well, I mean, sterilization, of course, is there's no unborn child involved only future unborn children, that will not happen, which I think would be a lower hurdle. A lower hurdle for what to get to pass? I don't see. I don't think you need to make it legal. It's

legal as is. It's not an illegal procedure. It's encouraged, obviously, maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're saying. But no, but there'll be some pushback. Of course, we people, sterilizing the line and Nazis. Well, I know we can legally do it, you know, that kind of argument, the reverse with Roe versus Wade or but you're talking about forced sterilization then? Because as a volunteer, I don't want to use for I don't want to use force numbers, you can voluntarily

kill yourself in most states. It's not worse, let's say coerced? Yes, I will let you be honest with us the UBI thing? Well, yes, I completely believe that that can be deemed legal. And the one roadblock has been removed out of the way. Now it depends. I think, I don't know. I don't know if that really removes the roadblock. I'm not sure. The reason why I'm saying let me explain my point here be clear.

If you move row out the way to say, hey, we the Supreme Court can't legislate on whether, you know, it's a constitutional right to have a child or not have a child, we're kicking it back down to the states. Now the states can say, hey, you know, we'll offer money to get you sterilized. And I don't think that could really make it back to the Supreme Court under the

same now. It could be brought there I think, but I don't think they I think they were ruling saying I don't even think it'll be controversial if states introduced that. I think people would be oh, this is great. There will be there'll be no controversy. People who had no I think that's that's a really scary, I'm telling you, I think it would be like oh, this is fantastic. I want I want a family. Let all those dumb efforts, let them take the money and do stuff. Whatever. Enjoy that.

No. Free doughnuts and free french fries like the vaccine. I got sterilized I think I think it is a natural progression of the plan. And I don't see why there would be any pushback at all. Wow, you look at it. Yeah. I've been thinking about this for a couple of weeks. You really set me started me up on this? And I'm like, Yeah, you know, I can if people take cut, it was okay to give people a damn burger and fries to get a death shot. A heart Dart.

A no free Krispy Kremes. Yeah, Krispy Kreme donut, 100 calories. Even better example. So that was that was celebrated. Come on, that was celebrate it was grown it for climate. I'm doing it for the climate. Now. There's another reason people be happy to do it. I think that would be the biggest reason. It's it's the virtue reason. Yeah, it's the reason absolutely the already. I mean, it was just

I think it was on my mind had been PBS. They were interviewing young women who were either had been sterilized or had or were had scheduled to be sterilized because of climate change. And it's there's no controversy over it. And now because a feature of the vaccine is a feature, now, it's over. Because you ain't get sterilized. Except you don't get any UBI you don't get any money. So that's kind of a gyp. We got to you know, people are gonna catch on,

wait a minute, I need to get compensated. I think it's in the cards mo I'm, I'm certain of it. And it's funny because that's the Shockley theory that people Were so outraged by in 1974. In this is his last point is the doubt raised because he's saying the glass, they say the quiet part out loud, not that a ska crazy idea. It was like shaking your head on the script, you know, like how Oh, like, shut up. He didn't, he didn't have climate change. That's that's

the difference he had. He had dis Genex he didn't have climate change. If you got climate change, you can sell it. Okay. Alright, so I guess, let's just jump a little bit ahead. And let's go ahead and go to America's campaign to create a

master race. But now, there's a resurgence of the same impulse that caused eugenics in the first place. I'm speaking of new Genex. And this time, it will not be racial dogma, national flags. This time, it will be globalization, profit, bottom line, corporate activity that determines who is fit and who is not fit to continue their existence. And legislators are seeing this as the new threat of

discrimination in the 21st century. And anti genetic legislation is already embraced by nations all over the world. And this legislation is in our Congress. Now. Surely, after I speak, the first vote is going to take place in the Senate to adopt anti genetic discrimination laws to stop gene lining, we all remember what redlining was. Now it will be gene lining. And so as we go into the dazzling 21st century, of genetic genies, we hope to help as many miracles as

possible come our way. But we also ask that Wall Street and these corporations and our society look over their shoulder and make sure that genetics does not return from whence it came. Yeah, look, those laws up actually, the genetic discrimination law. It's called Gina I think, gi Na, would you find there's loopholes? There's loopholes anywhere well written. Yeah, I'll put some in the show notes. Everyone can take a look at it. It's like a rubber steel skin thing where you like fold it up where

you can find a loophole to get out of the deal. Yeah. So I think the biggest thing that just to let people know that was a throwback clip from the last show. Show 84 I think I put a file in the thing. But yeah, so I think the biggest test is going to be the IQ test. I really think they're going to John Lyon based off of off of intelligence. The only problem with that now you can take your goggles off is the flawed science show. Yes. And orcas. Yes. Is this 15? Because it's really good story.

Yes, it's going jumping to 15. In 1905, psychologists Alfred Binet and Theodore Simone designed a test for children who were struggling in school in France, designed to determine which children required individualized attention. Their method formed the basis of the

IQ test. Beginning in the late 19th century, researchers hypothesized that cognitive abilities like verbal reasoning, working memory, and visual spatial skills reflected an underlying general intelligence or G factor, C Mon, and Binay, designed a battery of tests to measure each of these abilities

and combine the results into a single score. Questions were adjusted for each age group, and a child score reflected how they performed relative to others their age, dividing someone's score by their age and multiplying the result by 100 yielded the intelligence quotient for IQ. Yes, dynamite. This is real, this is really good.

So for the people listening at home, the way they calculate this score, and I want to be clear that we were on the same page, they take your score, divided by your age and then multiply it by 100. That's how you get your score. So let's say if you were let's rewind it back a little bit again, so I want people to hear how he explains it.

As an actor, Simone and Binay designed a battery of tests to measure each of these abilities and combine the results in to a single score, questions were adjusted for each age group, and a child score reflected how they performed relative to others their age right now to go back further, I said before now, you could be someone score by their age and multiplying the result by 100 yielded the intelligence quotient for IQ, right? Dividing by age times 100.

Right? So that bottom age is very, I want to say, questionable, but so say a child is four and it performs as an eight year old, right? Then you can have an IQ, just say IQ of 200, right? When you get tested later, doesn't mean you had to go higher. So you're gonna get tested into your six. Now you had to perform as a 12 year old. Right? If I'm understanding the math, the math equation correctly. So could early it's

not just a question more than anything. And please, if anybody has more information on the IQ test, explain it to me if I'm wrong, but does testing the child earlier give the child an advantage than waiting later? See, to me the history I heard of the IQ test, and this is the C mon Binay scale, but it's about the questions. And the questions are ones that they use that had Rikers Island at Ellis Island. Ellis Island, Rikers Island, but they were

questioning, but they were kind of rigged. Right? They were kind of rigged questions, like, you know, stuff that was cultural things, like, you know, who's you know, what team won the World Series, you know, someone who's an immigrant coming in, of course, had no idea even what the World Series was, perhaps. So it's it always comes down to the questions. That wasn't the balance for Western it was wasn't Silver Spoon. Right? That culture would have greater influence. I'm speaking more.

And that's, you're totally right. Could that history of is troubling to say the least. But also make it to the modern test? If you start testing children earlier, now I'm just asking the question, but I mean, when you look at numbers, would that give you an advantage? If you tick because you have a lower of your 440, you had to test like an eight year old to have an IQ score of 200. Now I understand to be 12. I understand what what you're saying. I

don't know how that works in practice. I can I can see how it's the whole thing is screwed. Does it makes no sense. And so much is based off of it? Because I think I don't I don't remember maybe mama facts can tell me if I ever had an IQ test. But have you had one? No, no, the only test that places? I mean? Well, it's not the LSAT isn't LSAT, one, one version of it. I noticed a standardized test.

I'm sure it's all rolled into common core. I'm sure it's being extrapolated from our current curriculum somehow. Now, we did take the California achievement test coming up in school, that was the standardized test of the time, kind of like the EOC is now but I'm just saying a straight up IQ test. Because it has so much hinges on it. You would think one of the two of us wish she had had it to say is this person Yeah, but we're different model. We're not like everybody else right?

Now give them access, you know, that might get access to places you don't need to be. But now I just want to ask that question about the age because that was more of a question and a statement. Because it seems like if the younger I mean, because we're talking about these elite daycares, private schools, a lot of that hinges off of the IQ test. So now we're saying if you haven't had that test, even access to the test, those doors not might not be open to you.

It totally possible I just don't know enough about it. Okay, so I just wanted to see if you if you knew that and if anybody else knows I would like to learn more I couldn't find

the answer to that. But I just wanted to bring that up because so much hands like I said so much hinges on it, especially I don't think for our age groups but like younger everything's about testing and I think that's the point I think the the IQ results are built into dude I've been talking to our teacher friend who teaches high school in Austin is known as the liberal high school teacher there's all this shit that they him because I'm like, I was actually talking about this very topics it Can

you discuss eugenics in your class versus, you know, when it comes to Darwinism and how it fits into civics? And she said, Oh, you know, I can't even And do that because my colleagues would ask me if I feel comfortable rewriting history, which is interesting. And and also should it's really not a part, you know, they have all of these. And she started to show me how you have to teach. It's called in Texas, the T k s the Texas educational knowledge standard. And that's what

they're tested on. So I think it's inherent into the testing and into the into the reporting results, which as we know, have constantly been skewed to keep dumb, undereducated kids looking like geniuses and passing to the next grade. In other words, lowered the standards. So I think that's the whole educational system has become one big IQ test. And if you see the speaking on generalized standardized test,

the LSAT, yeah. When I was coming out, like I remember kids after school would go to the lunch room and once parent who could afford it, and get the LSAT prep prep. Yeah. And they would basically teach them how to take the test. No, I didn't have that when I took it. And I did very wellness at you. But I'm just like being able, like, that's where that's where, like, do money, like I'm having no access means can, you know can actually control the doors that are open for you? Yep. All

right, so I guess we started to 15. Let's go on down to 16. Today, a score of 100 represents the average of a sample population, with 68% of the population scoring within 15 points of 100. C mon and Binay, thought the skills their test assessed would reflect general intelligence. But both then and now there's no single agreed upon definition of general intelligence. And that left the door open for people to use the test in service of their own preconceived assumptions about

intelligence. What started as a way to identify those who needed academic help, quickly became used to sort people in other ways, often in service of deeply flawed ideologies. One of the first large scale implementations occurred in the United States during World War One, when the military used an IQ test to sort recruits and screen them for officer training. Oh, I didn't know. Oh, yeah, yeah. Oh, yeah. You go to the trenches. Yeah, you stay in the tent.

Right. And that's kind of like what the ASVAB is. Yeah. Can we send to the front, oh, all the low scores that are front. It's amazing how much is based off a testing but this is I wanted to touch on again, this is sorting people that lens, go back to the blu ray thing. This is how they create the Boulay. They start testing kids at you know, four or five years old, you get on an academically gifted track, then you get on the AP track. Then

you get on the you know, oh, they're fit for Ivy League. And it goes from there. Wrong Rhodes Scholar, Rhodes Scholar. I mean, yeah, and he's just keep going up the ladder. And those people who their whole identity hinges on, you know, the system, let's just call it that. So they're not going to combat the system. That's why they go that's why they play along right with him. While they Boulais is quite, not only ineffective, but is is a detriment to the who they supposed to represent. But they

embrace that, or you're different. You know, that's why they always like lead off with these long titles like Dr. Song sold better than 19 letters. The honorable. Yeah, and I'm not, I'm not trying to diminish, diminish anybody's achievement. But when you become a prisoner of your achievements, and you've seen this with doctors, like they will quietly say, Oh, we

know this is not right. But they're so scared to lose their, you know, their place in society that they go right along with it's capture, it's capture, but they've been groomed. If I can still say that word. They've been groomed to think they're elite. At from an early age. You know, you don't have people like do well in 11th grade and become doctors. I mean, that's like it's possible, but it's highly

unlikely you had to be on a track. Wait, I mean, you look at some of the presidential candidates and politicians that will put in that track. Yeah, are way early on. They tried to get mo but now I'm serious because my brother was on the faculty academic grade gifted track. And they tested me when I went in their room. I was like, this is weird. Why wait? What are they? Like an IQ test?

I guess I mean, I don't know, per se an IQ test, but it was, oh, you know, I was performing very well on my gen pop. So they wanted to bring me over and it was like when I got in there like purpose. I remember it was fourth grade, I was in an MS full sheets class. And they were like, Oh, we want to know, they came and got me out of class. I felt special. When I got in the room, and I was like, this is weird. It was weird to me. I mean, even at a young age, so I tanked on purpose.

No, you did not. I did. I'm serious. You tanked it on purpose. Yes. And you were how old? I was in fourth grade. Oh, that's that's some foresight, brother. Hey, is that is that Rocco? Is Rocco freaking out on over there? Can you hear me? Yeah, a little bit in the back. I don't mind. Okay. Yes, yes. That's the home. But yeah. Yeah. And I told the story before, but then I won, like seventh grade. Seventh grade treasurer for the school. And they're like, Oh, you're gonna be a future Freedom Rider.

And, uh, yeah, right. Yeah. They want you to get on the bus and do the mock Freedom Ride. Oh, yeah, that's right now they did try to get you. You're right. Yeah. Oh, well, I've been. I've had a couple of new brushes, the Boulais recruitment. We were glad you survived all that. I just didn't feel weird. I mean, I that's all I can tell you. I'm not like I had like, serious insight. God, God had a different plan for you. Oh, yeah. You're gonna be a podcast in one day. So like,

no freedom writer for you podcasters the future? That's right. All right. 19.

At that time, many people believed in eugenics, the idea that desirable and undesirable genetic traits could and should be controlled in humans through selective breeding. There were many problems with this line of thinking, among them the idea that intelligence was not only fixed and inherited, but also

linked to a person's race. Under the influence of eugenics, scientists used the results of the military initiative to make erroneous claims that certain racial groups were intellectually superior to others, without taking into account that many of the recruits tested were new immigrants to the United States who lacked formal education or English language exposure. They created an erroneous

intelligence hierarchy of ethnic groups. The intersection of eugenics and IQ testing influenced not only science, but policy as well. Exactly. This is 17, by the way, not 19. Just Oh, excuse me, sorry about that. That's okay. And this is the root of white supremacy. Yes, this is this is and you see, it's tied closely to Darwinism and evolution, like this. We you start trying to get that pit out. The whole thing could collapse. And this is why they don't want to talk about it.

This is exactly why they don't want to talk about it. Because now it's like, okay, if the IQ doesn't work, then what do we use? And it's still biased. But I think they're beyond that. I mean, to me, it see, and when when I say they, it's the lizard people, it's the eight 900 people who probably run the world. I think they're beyond it that just like, Okay, we're gonna put this stuff in place.

This will reduce the population, people in the know. Or people who have just figured it out will survive, and they'll survive because they will will do certain things won't do other things. But they're making it increasingly difficult for everybody, particularly food and energy. And, and I think I think they're being non discriminatory. Now, I don't think I just move beyond it.

What, how wrong, I had to push back on that, because I think is very disturbing, discriminatory, because if you're born into the right families, you're going to be alright. I mean, you could be dumb as a rock. You could be you could No, I agree. Hence they say smoke Parmesan cheese, and you're gonna be alright, so I agree. She's gonna give you millions of dollars. So right but so you don't need to test you just need to make sure someone's from the right family, you just need to look at the you

don't need to test you just need to go to the right college. You need to be in the right sorority or fraternity. Well, they also have to leave the door open for the quote unquote, different ones, you know? Oh, and I think we talked about in our last show with the LSAT or maybe we didn't, but they have this way now of looking at your zip code. And they kind of give you a grade you're on a curve. So it's like

okay, you made the throw a fictitious number out here. You made 1200 But coming from where you come from, right, you get an extra 100. Right because of, but that's the kind of people they look for because he or she if they overachieve, in those environments, that's the kind of person we need. Okay, so they always got to keep that door open to lead for upward mobility so that you born you're not gonna go down. If you born in the right family, it's no

longer calling. It's making sure you pick the cherries out. Yes. Okay. I'm with you on that. Alright, so let's go ahead and go to 18.

In 1924, the state of Virginia created policy, allowing for the forced sterilization of people with low IQ scores, a decision the United States Supreme Court upheld in Nazi Germany, the government authorized the murder of children based on low IQ. Following the Holocaust and the civil rights movement, the discriminatory uses of IQ tests were challenged on both moral and scientific grounds, scientists began to gather

evidence of environmental impacts on IQ. For example, as IQ tests were periodically recalibrated over the 20th century, new generations scored consistently higher on old tests than each previous generation, this phenomenon known as the Flynn effect happened much too fast to be caused by inherited evolutionary traits. Instead, the cause was likely environmental, improved education, better health care, and better nutrition. the Flynn effect is that what that was called the Flynn effect,

the Flynn effect. So over time, in general, all scores go up. Now, could that be? Like I said, due to better education are easier questions? Yeah, easier questions? I mean, you mean, I would think it could possibly be just like increased intelligence. I mean, we all learn more. But I think the quality of education is the real issue, because I don't want to get too far ahead. But there's a gap. This is this. And it stays the same, even though both are

on an upward trajectory. Right, you know, the space between the two lines stay the same. So I'm right. And another point I wanted to bring in there is nature versus nurture and nutrition. Because this is a big Yeah, nutrition. Nutrition is not even brought into the equation. I don't think it was whereas we know how important it is very important. I mean, not only what you eat, but when you eat that was kind of how the whole thing about the breakfast

program so kids don't go to school hungry. So they can, you know, get a good, good start off to their day. But even then, they have these programs, but the bus gets there to miss something. I witnessed my own eyes, that the bus gets there too late when the kids can't make it down to the cafeteria eat. Or it's you know, it's just some slop. That's the other thing. Yeah. So yeah, so nature versus nurture is a big thing

here. Wish the darn Darwinist thing is majority nature is not I mean, use hard coded, you know, I think we spoke about like computers, you know, everybody bought the same specs, or is this like you're a Dounreay was like, Okay, you just don't have their hard drive and RAM and you're seeing the cube do this computation to share a Chromebook. Sorry. Right, then they look at it. Um, this is crazy. But that's, that's that's exactly how they look at it. So I guess now we

can go and get into number 19. I got a little ahead of myself, and this is going to talk about the testing more.

In the mid 20th century, psychologists also attempted to use IQ tests to evaluate things other than general intelligence, particularly schizophrenia, depression, and other psychiatric conditions. These diagnoses relied in part on the clinical judgment of the evaluators, and used a subset of the tests used to determine IQ. A practice later research found

does not yield clinically useful information. Today, IQ tests employ many similar design elements and types of questions as the early tests, though, we have better techniques for identifying potential bias in a test. They're no longer used to diagnose psychiatric conditions. But a similarly problematic practice. Using sub test scores is still sometimes used to diagnose learning disabilities. against the advice of many

experts. Psychologists around the world still use IQ tests to identify intellectual disability and the results can be used to determine appropriate educational support, job training and assisted living. IQ test results have been used to justify horrific policies and scientifically baseless ideologies. That doesn't mean the test itself is worthless. In fact, it does a good job of measuring the reasoning and

problem solving skills it sets out to. But that isn't the same thing as measuring a person's potential. Yeah, again, the more I hear this, the more I'm convinced that they've just built all this shit right into their standardized test, standardized testing. Lord knows where the results go. I mean, it's all online, it's all back to Department of Education. I think this is the this is the basis. This is what it is, is how it's used. But it's, it's probably

just built into the system now. For for, you know, for what you call the, you know, picking the cherries out, it's like, hey, you know, this, this, this one's doing well is that No Child Left Behind, they tell me they tell you in the policies, they do, No Child Left Behind, it's like, Okay, we're gonna take the smartest kids out of the quote, unquote, and this is their term dumbest schools, and move them along. And just one more thing,

before we wrap up the segment, is that, here's another problem. When you tie money to testing, this is a real occurrence. Parents coaching their kids to perform poorly. So they can get the monetary gains that come along with having learning

disabilities. To say I'm real thing, this is a very real thing, because and if you think about it, if you're in abject poverty, and you can get another $700,000 Because your son has to sit in a different class, the short term thinking is like okay, I can use this and what the other one is bouncing deals like no man house. Yeah, what programs are delivering that though, if your child is special, because they're, they're behind. When you get when you have a learning disability, you can get

a check. And it's a tire like get a check. That's what they call it, like, get a check. So if you have a learning disability, he's like SSI or Social Security, or somebody cuts you a check for your child. And I don't know anything about this. Yes. So we you asked a poor person is your desk. And they'll frame it in a way asking you to perform a little behind, you know, and not and I say it's not the majority, but it is a real occurrence. Because I've seen it and heard it discussed, that parents

coached your kids to perform poorly Wow. Or inadvertently sabotage them, so they can get more money. And that just lends to more to the what the UBI conversation totally you know, you you'd be surprised what people would do for money when they're in when you're in a tight spot. Especially. And this guy, this gave birth to a term called the alphabet kids because the kids will have like, be American. My mom was a social

worker was a social worker. She's a therapist now. Um, but you have B H L D does learn disability, ad that's what ad a hyperactive ADHD AD AD USA me all these things. If your child is associated with that, there is money that's tied to that. As well as pills. The pills are, well, it's kind of goes hand in hand. We'll give you some money, but you got to put them on the pills too. So like the parents like okay, and it's a poor parent, one of

those unfit parents that we've talked about. They say hold on, so you're gonna give me something to calm him down? Are you gonna give me a check? Right? Boy, you go on here and make a good score on this test. I bust your head while I'm that Nash. You're laughing? And I'm sad to say it. Yeah, but this is a real saying but nobody thinks about the long term. What is that child end up at? 18 years old would a legal drug habit and no skills. Yeah, that's exactly what happens.

So um, so. Alright, so I guess we can thanks some people for

making this show happen. Yes, let's revisit what we're all about. The white man and the black man have to be able to sit down at the same table. The white man has to feel free to speak his mind without hurting the feelings of that negro. And the so called Negro has to feel free to speak his mind without hurting the feelings of the white man then They can bring the issues that are under the rug out on top of the table and take an intelligent approach to get the problem themselves.

That's the only way we'll ever do it. And I think we've done just that during this episode. So we'll open honesty love that it is Mo facts with Adam curry episode 85 value for value was the only way that this comes to you. And let

me just revisit because you have to understand this is now the new international lifestyle living value for value. People are seeing how well it works. What you do is you hear this, you consume this, you take it in it has value to you or not if and if you're still listening at this point two hours in, you've got to and you see no value you've got to question what

you're doing with your time. However, whatever the value is that you get from it, all you have to do and only you can determine that is send it back to us in some monetary forms a couple of different ways to do it. We have our podcasting 2.0 Boost booster grounds. We'll thank those people in a moment but first we have our Fiat fun coupons people who went to mo

fund me.com Or just to the donation page and Mo fox.com. We've helped us out mainly through cash app and PayPal and we start off with our big baller shot caller 20 his blades on him Paula grant G comes in with 199 dot 99 and says appreciate the work. Ballers be ballin I guess grant already knew that. He was going to going to be the big baller keep it up. He must must be your cousin from the future. By the way, it's creative design versus everyone else. I'm not sure I understand

the context. He saw him I think evolution. Oh, okay. Right. Got it. Yeah, I could share my personal beliefs. But this is not the forum. Work on stay strong or thank you very much grant you we appreciate that. Judy Schwartz 185 today from Judy says thank you both and we both Thank you, Jose retana $100 And he says standing ovation for episode 84 Thank you Mo and Adam. Thank you. We have Amy M with the 85 and this is a show club donation from Dame SL slammy. Slay me I should say

Dame slay me. Yes, Amy slay me slay me got it. You'll be there. You'll be listed. Amy Thank you very much. See Davis 53 dot 33 A no note. I wonder it's interesting. This number. I'm not quite sure the 33 rings familiar to me. Rochelle. S same number 5333. No note, just know that the facts family love is here for you. Thanks for everything. And we appreciate that very much. Carlito. Carlito Hearst $50 Megan Emory. $50. Kyle man. 50. William Taylor comes in with 50 and says

knowledge. Great job, gentlemen. Thank you, Christina H $50. She says she's paying attention now. I hear you. We love that you're paying attention. Z n $50. wants a D dead beating. Congratulation. You're no longer a deadbeat. Thanks mo for all your shows. Here's a little something and I'm glad to chip in. Man, we hate this chip. And wants a mo karma sending you tons of good off energy. Things that haven't played that in a while. You've got karma.

Play this other one too. Here we go. You've got that's what I wanted. And then our final Associate Executive Producers we've run through the list at $50 is Jill W. Who sells love you guys in the show. Can I please get a mo karma yet? We'll roll it out for you. You've got mo calm. We'll be thanking the rest of these producers later on. First a quick switch to the booster grams that we received. Now this works with podcasting 2.0 It's great because the minute you get that urge, like I

want to send some value back right next to the play button is a boost button and you can even send a message along with it. And the traditional financial system takes no cut. It's direct peer to peer and we kick it off with Sir Shaun of the Allegheny Valley 100,000 SATs we really appreciate that a nice a nice boost for us. He says they're running different experiments and all of us to see which gets them and what they want the quickest and cheapest will we wake up in time. Some will, some

will. You would like a WUSA. lavish comes in with a row of nines 99,999 It says always great we appreciate that. 84,000 from hard hat 50,000 from Chad Farrow 40 949 from Auburn citadel 44 and 37 for Merlin he sent in two boosts another one for 48 827. These are meaningful numbers this this makes a difference in our lives. We appreciate that. We got some converts. Yo Yeah, yes. Here's the Convert names come from the Fiat oversight of the booths

we love. Yeah, we love that really appreciate it. You can use your cash out by the way to fill up one of these podcasts and 2.0 apps new podcast apps.com clewd 33,333. I don't know who turned me on to this. One of the most previous efforts episodes but I know I heard the recommendation from OFAC show. So, passing it on I read the book war against the week by

Edwin black. Yes. We discussed this on no agenda. This is very much he says Mr. Black did a deep dive in a mountain of research into the American eugenics programs with an early 1900s The book can be done downloaded. You can also buy it I purchased it also every show is so jam packed with research. I don't care how long Moe it takes to get recorded. Just get

it done. And then he ends up with a go podcasting we haven't had one of those in a while Hold on a second Do I have a I do a go podcasting where do you go is that is that alright right there that's what you think But hold on a second book go maybe this works we also no no. Here it is. Can't believe I misplaced that sorry about that. It's very unprofessional. Sir Dwayne metal unsewn comes in with 33,333 as well he says episode 84 was very

enlightening. Living in the Pacific North woke all the messaging you get a saturated with very one sided perspective the our BG clips were surprising. And around here, RGB is almost defined is almost defied. I'm trying to see what he's right here. RGB is almost Oh, deified and there's a big iHeart RGB sign a couple of miles down the road from my house. For example, by the way y'all is the most inclusive

pronoun. On a related note, if you're ever asked for your pronouns, try putting them down as Daddy Daddy daddy's okay. Okay, sir Dwayne, you will try doing that for sure. That Texas rancher says, doing great, y'all. This is what I can do for now was 25,000. It's appreciated sir WAGs. 15,033. Thank you for your courage. Todd is in Northern Virginia, a row of sticks 11,111 C dubs with 10,000 101. And we have smoked meal finally at 10,000. He says I'm here for the conspiracy

facts. Well, you came to the right place, didn't you? Thank you again for these boosts for these booster grams. If you'd

like to. Onboard real quick just to see how everything works, you can use the fountain app you can even earn some of the SATs by listening to other shows, and then send them to us. And for all of that information mo facts.com. Go to the donation page or mo Funmi Mo Mo e fu nd me.com And thank you to these

producers for bringing us some value. For more facts with Adam curry, episode number 85. Can I show you for one more thing? Of course. Can I get a biscuit for each class aka the coach who say oops, sorry about that. Ready for now we just celebrate his birthday this week. So All righty. They always give me a biscuit on my birthday. Just big ass biscuit for you class. Yeah. They're big biscuit out the way. Oh, why you're in there. Give the trigger warning. We're ready. So because this,

this next set of clips right here. This is where we start to see racial evolution being applied by a racist and I don't

mean it as a disparaging term, but I wouldn't classify anything else. This is Jared Taylor. How you heard of Jared Taylor before? I don't think so. Okay, hold on. Let me do the trigger warning first. Oops, here we go. All right, we're ready. Now we're good to go. This is some cold hard race truth 20 A why to blacks behave the way they do. Why is it that whenever we read certain headlines, we can be almost certain that the story is about black people. For example, for dead including

child after stimulus check dispute leads to gunfire. Or how about toddler died after being left alone for six days as mothers celebrated 18th birthday or to school girl carjackers aged 13 and 15 are pulled from overturned vehicle in DC interested for murder? And how about a postal worker in Michigan brutally beaten by two women video shows. And then there is the perennial, a 55 shot 10 fatal in Chicago weekend gun violence. Even the most committed liberals must know

these stories are going to be about blacks. And anyone whose eyes aren't shut tight knows that IQ has something to do with it. Even the very leftist Wikipedia recognizes that on intelligence tests, there is a difference in average score between black people and white people have 1.1 standard deviations. In practical terms, that means only 16% of blacks have an IQ of 100 or higher. And it means that whites are 30 times more likely than blacks to have an IQ over 125.

All right, who is this? Jumoke? This is Derek Taylor. He's a big pusher of the bell curve studies, right? You can't hear him Yang or find us on YouTube. So you probably need to get the day out this big shoot. Bid shoot as a fan favorite man beat you is like the is the is the YouTube of old. You know, that's how it should be everybody should be able to put their information out there. And if it stands up, it stands up.

And if it's if it doesn't, it gets rid of Q but this is where the rubber meets the road it this is the water blacks behave. Why do blacks behave? Like they do a tie you start your sentence off like that. And this is where that blacks, the blacks, blacks? This is where you because you asked me about that before we use it like this, right? Is it? Can you say blacks? Can you say the blocks? Yeah, that was the question, right? So he said, Why do blacks behave like they do? And he goes off,

he lists a bunch of headlines which are true. And there are probably a huge problem. I'll never deny that. But I think they're being amplified for a reason as well. This is another guy who comes from the tech world. Interestingly enough. Did you know that he was the West Coast editor for PC Magazine for a while there in the 80s? I did not know that. And I happen to know someone who wrote for PC Magazine in the 80s. So I'm gonna have to ask the Vortech about this guy.

That's interesting. QA, what somebody's got what that maybe they look like, we've used up computer analogy, but maybe they look at humans like computers, and just say okay, they expect differently? Oh, well, no, I think there's something to that Shockley

clearly, you know, the inventor of the transistor effect. I would say most Silicon Valley guys and gals who are at the top, they're all into singularity, and they believe in a different version of eugenics and that their version is oh, we can improve the broken ones, we can improve the bad ones, we can improve ourselves, we can make it all better through technology. Right? So this is where the Darwinism meets the rubber meets the road, where I am just to make it clear, there are issues.

There is a gap. But is it due to nature or nurture? And this is this is the big question nobody really wants to ask. Because if it's due to nurture, what are the things leading? What are the main component? Is this leading to these tests services, and these issues that we see that are prevalent in the quote unquote, community? So, but if it's nature, then it's like, okay, are we gonna get some Elon ships that you know, to get us

up to speed, you know, use your spoke about the singularity. But so where does geographic ZIP Code fall is zip code a part of nurture, or zip codes are part of nature because zip codes being used, will be nurture, because it's the environment you grew up in nature's solely means, what genes was passed from your two parents and their lineage going backwards, right? That's, that's how you're born. You mean like whatever you receive from them.

That will be nurtured nature. Everything that happens post birth, will be nurture, which I believe that's the real issue. You're Being poor education, poor diet, poor environment, over stimulation due to television and media in general. These things, lack of culture, all of these things. And you can add me on that when I culture. We had one we it was manipulated in the 70s, like we talked about before with black Blaxploitation films, no father and house, that totally ruin whatever culture we

were forming at the time. So what he goes on to speak about, in his next clip about the bell curve, which we're gonna get deeper into, well, I'm gonna let him continue on with history theory. Back in 1984, the famous book, the bell curve, reported long established findings on the correlation between low IQ, and all kinds of behavior. We don't want crime, poverty, their legitimacy, shift, lessness, obesity, you name it. All these things are a lot more likely in people with low IQs than in

smart people. But IQ isn't the whole story. If you compare blacks and whites with the same IQs black behavior is still different. So what's going on? The obligatory explanation is that systemic racism and white supremacy are making life miserable for black people. But there's a better explanation. And Professor Richard Lin of the University of Ulster has done the most important work on this question. He's written a book showing that blacks across the board are more likely than

whites to be psychopaths. There's a good summary of his findings and an [email protected] called Race and psychopathic personality. The American Psychiatric Association defines psychopathic personality as including such things as breaking rules, failure to plan ahead, aggressiveness and frequent fighting, risk taking failure to honor financial obligations. Being a bad parent, and inability to be sexually faithful. Blacks are more

psychopathic than whites on all accounts. And by the way, whites are more psychopathic than Asians. Okay, I respect his honesty, even though it may be flawed. And thinking I respect the fact that he would get up in front of a camera and state what he feels because you can't hide. And we talked about that before, on the last show, how they tried to do the guy from dis Genex to Silent soon. No, you got to let this be said. Then we can have a hard, honest conversation around it.

And I'm saying it wasn't as people. But there's two words I want to focus on here out of what he said. One, let's start with Shift listeners. Okay, shift listeners has a Are you familiar with that definition? First of all, well, no, i plus. No, no. Okay. Lacking in restraint. shiftless. Yes. shiftless. No SHIF, T. L. E. S. S, laziness into indolence in Dolan's and lack of ambition. Lacking lacking This is from Merriam Webster, lacking in

resourceful resourcefulness, any efficient, okay? And if you're resourceful that means to able to meet situation capable of devising ways and means. So this, this goes right down to the savage mind state of manifest destiny said, hey, they're not resourceful. They have all those natural resources. And they're living in mud huts. we're entitled to go to them and take their land. They're Savage, they're dumb. They don't know what they're doing. They have no clue.

This, this goes key back to what doorwins was talking about. Like they're, they're not. They're inefficient. Let's just boil it down to that. Well, the reason why I want to point out this word too is it has a cultural connotation. Maybe to people my age and maybe older because this used to be a main component of the definition of the N word. When the N word actually had a definition. Before it became just a derogatory term to to

towards black people. Okay, with shiftless, ignorant, you know, saying and it was one more I mean, they said lazy was another one which lazy and shiftless, kinda redundant, but it was basically shipped to us like you'd have had no underpinnings. I remember this as a child now. This was how it was defined to us. And that's why when he used that word, I was kind of triggered. Like, oh, yeah, like whoa, you say like, but under

the definition of it is true. That there any fishing, you're giving all this opportunity, all of this knowledge and you're not doing anything with it. So from his perspective, that's inefficient, right? That's inefficient. The other one is psychopath. Let's see. Yeah, this this this was kind of weird the psychopath that I mean, according to Merriam Webster, antisocial behavior, narcissism, superficial charm, impulsivity, callous, unemotional, lack of guilt, lack of empathy.

Yep. And omit a mentally unstable person nest. That's the core definition of it. So this is just another way of saying Savage is a more scientific way to say it. Yeah. But once again, we're back to Darwinism. And like I said, I'm not setting these clips up this way. But I didn't make Jerry Taylor say the thing. And he said, but this is how they view it, and they like

it. And it's baked in. It's genetics, is nature. Because if it's nurtured and you fix the condition, that's, you know, with the nurturing process, yeah, they know, they clearly they clearly think it's nature. Oh, yeah. Ah, so let's go ahead and get into 20. See, yeah, yep. That was noted earlier. Psychopaths have trouble planning ahead. And you can test whether people live in the

present, or think about the future. In the 1970s, Walter Mischel came up with the marshmallow test, in which he gave children a choice between one marshmallow now, or two marshmallows at some point in the future. This and similar studies with older children find that people who can delay rewards, that is those who think in terms of the future, get better grades, are less likely to smoke or take drugs, and are

more successful in life. These results have been widely reported, much less widely reported are the racial differences with the usual pattern. Whites are more willing than blacks to wait for a greater reward. And Asians are more willing than whites. You get the same race differences when you control for IQ. Because the ability to delay gratification is correlated with intelligence. But it's not the same thing as intelligence. Why would blacks be more

psychopathic? In his excellent book, making sense of race? Edward Dutton argues that it's because of evolution. When was this what was this interview from how long ago was this recorded? This is this is recent not Oh gee, this is this is recent. And it's called if you want to find it on bit shoe is it's more than IQ is entitled to video. Crikey I forget to name his operation, but let me just go okay. Now when people say Okay, I think okay, let me back up a little bit cuz I'm a little bit

flustered here. Why is the premises are the psychopaths, just by his definition, breaking rules, who breaks more rules and why it's the premises. And I'm not talking about the the ideal Kentucky we're saying with a gun rack and a rebel flag. I'm talking about the hardcore one world globalist mindset because that's the fuller definition nearly fuller definition of white supremacy is a one world government, ie the Illuminati,

globalism whatever you're saying you fill in the blank. Okay, now, this is this is Jared Taylor's criteria for sociopath a psychopath Excuse me. breaking rules. Check ferry to plan it. Well, they do fit they plan ahead. They plan well ahead so I can't I can't give him that when he knows that. Okay. Aggressive and fighting. Didn't Nancy Pelosi just fly to Taiwan to provoke people? Aren't we sticking our finger in Russia

out of nowhere in the way with the way you go about it? But isn't this whole world surrounded our battle fighting aid we killed the terrorists for the fourth time the same one Don't Don't Don't Don't ixnay on the killing a again a okay. No. No, you absolutely it's Totally psychopathic behavior. risk taking, hey, let's release this lamb in China and see what happens. Even better, better net gain of function research. You know

what? They made a law here I will just send it to China we can trust those guys bright okay bad credit not not holding up to your financial responsibilities who's printing more money? Oh he wasn't who has a deficit right now bad parents and six understands I'm faithful six I mean that kind of thing. So I mean, and this will he'll be the same kind of person that tell you that that World War One

World Government or maybe he won't. But people that buy into his way of thinking will tell you oh, this is the globalist is trying to ruin our kids and teaching them about transgenderism. And when you bring this on white supremacy, he's like, no, no, no, no, unless the thing is white supremacy. well defined as a one word government. Right? Right. It's the same thing if you define it properly. Right? There so triggered on holding on to that is so

embedded part of your identity I in I get it. I understand that, you know, you're saying part of my identity, but which they don't identify with you. That's the thing that people don't identify. You're trying to identify with them what they don't identify with you. Right? And you're on the chopping block is just as much as me and as you see how Gen six and and all this stuff is playing out. They gotta get you out of the way first, because you got the guns? Yeah. You know, I'm just saying it's

this. It goes to show you how like, if someone like me said white supremacy is the issue. Of course, I needed to find any term on use. But it's not it's not it. But then they'll say, Yeah, globalism is ruling the world. Well, that's what I'm saying. Right? We're saying the same thing. Well, but that's why it's important to define it, though.

Yes, well, it's semantics in that case. But the problem is that white supremacy has been morphed into a political slur against anyone who's not a leftist, Marxist, progressive, right? Because even now, black people can be white supremacist, or Clarence Thomas, does he? Yeah, he's the black face of white supremacy. Thank you, thank you. But now you see, but we also got to identify what white supremacy is and ain't no more supreme, then

take this shot, or else that's right. Or stay in your house or oil or give me your guns or else. I mean, that's the biggest kind of thug I ever seen in my life. And scary too. So I just want I just want to lay that out. And then let's go to the marshmallow test. I just want to ask you a quote. Have you heard of the marshmallow test? I have a feeling I heard about the marshmallow test on this show in a previous episode. I'm not sure why or but it's, I've heard of it. Yes.

Oh, okay. So basically, instant gratification versus delayed gratification is the is the poll, you're saying? Yeah, because you have to be smart to see that it's much smarter to wait and get to later on, which, you know, that all depends how hungry are you? I mean, there's a lot of reasons where the marshmallow and by the way, I reject the premise that you should be giving out free marshmallows that oh, this is

not healthy. Marshmallows is some kind of test, you know, make it a steak or something. And when the kid that didn't eat the marshmallow just didn't like marshmallow shoots and you project me on him. Are you gonna be successful kid you didn't eat the mark is like marshmallows. But this is how arbitrary these tests are. Now, I'm not saying it's something too now. We do have a serious issue with

delayed gratification versus instant gratification. And that's how basically they will define unfit person is because you don't think long term, you think short term. Now can a person that's a one marshmallow person become our Learn to be to marshmallow person? I think so. Of course. But they don't see that's the that's the problem is like no, you had to one marshmallow sim to the gas chamber. That's basically how it boils down. I'm not being very crude with it. But that's how

they look at it like it's baked into your DNA. You're screwed the part of this I think you mentioned it on the last episode

not and I've actually thought about I should go back and revisit Trading Places. Right? Because that really, yeah, it was with money. But it was also it was true white supremacy of Mortimer and his brother there who was like, oh, you know, should we can we take this savage and come and can he then become as successful as we can? It's all kind of part of the same, same attitude.

That's the argument that's going on right now, between the two wings of the One World Government, one saying, You know what, white people are Genet and Asians are genetically superior. So we need to give them every advantage possible to take up the spots we have. And then the other side of saying, Well, we have talented people of all hues, they'll go along with it. And we need to understand what the cause fall where they may.

And that's, that's the bet between Mortimore and his brother was like, could they take a switch to people from two different backgrounds and prove that his nature or nurture, that's basically the whole movie, and in a nutshell, is nature versus nurture? And it proved come to come out, it was

nurture. Yeah, if you gave somebody from lower background, the opportunity, they would flourish, and then if you put somebody from a higher, more fluent background, on the streets, they will become a savage in a matter of days, right. So yeah, that movie was, that was a very heavy movie worth, heavy movie worth revisiting. It's good. All right, so now he's gonna ask our question, why are whites better?

whites and Asians evolved in harsh northern climates, in which people had to make plans to make it through the winter, they had to cooperate to hunt and share food, and couples had to stay together for children to survive. Africa was more forgiving, cooperation, planning ahead and care for children were less important. Psychopaths could survive, reproduce, and pass along their genes. I think this is as good an explanation as any. The point is, however they got that way. People of

different races are, on average, different. expecting everyone to be the same is crazy. Blaming clients, when blacks fall short, is not just crazy, it's vicious. Until we understand this, we can't even begin to talk about America's problems, much less solving them. Thank you for watching.

Hold on a second, he's kind of contradicting himself here. If, if it's nature versus nurture, what he's kind of saying here is well, back in the day, early on, it was nurture because you know, these were things that were taught you had to plan ahead to make sure that you know the cold winter, etcetera, etcetera. And then it became nature somehow, you know what I'm saying? That's a weird, what he's saying is the element the harsh elements, eliminate

the social sociopaths. I think that's where psychopaths excuse me, eliminate the psychopath in those colder elders. Ah, okay. Because it was basically nature took its place I guess. You were the grasshopper instead, the ant nature had a way of weaning you out and it made for better stock. This is the word I like to use it made for better right. So the so the people were naturally selected in Europe and Northern Europe, because the smart ones did what was necessary.

Right and there Yeah, they died off and and Africa was so nice and warm and lush. It was a hotbed for psychopaths. Yeah, yeah. You don't have to plan ahead at all in Africa now for nothing no. So easy, so easy. And I will say to him so now if China puts his foot up America's but America just it is I mean, that's just nature taking this

court right here, right? I mean, they're to the right of you on you know, saying they're more or less psychopathic right so I mean, see how this thing has become a slippery slope is if it's good for the goose and it's good for the gander whatever it may be may be interesting if China takes us take him and I say take takes America out maybe it takes it was what was meant to be because they were better stock but I know he doesn't

think that way. I doubt it to you. And now I'm not making this person about him but I'm just saying people that subscribe to his way of thinking but haha Wait, wait a minute. Wait a minute. That's different. Know If China a Chinese, Asian people look better. They deserve to be the number one superpower in the world. By their logic by your own logic. But that's not the way it goes. And this is why this is why they don't have any

footage to stand on. But with that said, we can go through these next few clips kind of fast, because what it does is, this is Jared Jordan Peterson, excuse me. And what he's going to do is break down the occupations by IQ level. And what I want people to point out is, I always says, and this is where the genesis of the statement, it starts with us. It starts with those Now, once this machine is to go rolling, they come in for everybody. So he's gonna go through the IQ

occupation for IQ. And we can go through these pretty quickly. Okay, so how smart do you have to be to be different things in life? Well, if you were have an IQ of 116 230, which is 85th percentile and above, so it's one person that ate up to one person in 130, I believe is 8590 95. Is it 95. I think it's 95, one person a to one person and 20, then you can be a attorney, a research analyst, and editor and advertising manager, a chemist and engineer and executive manager, et

cetera. That's, that's the, no, that's not the high end for IQ, by the way, you know that it can go up, while it can go up indefinitely, although there's fewer and fewer people as it goes up. So if you want to be the best at what you're doing, bar none, then having an IQ of Above 145 is a necessity. And maybe you're pushing 160 In some situations, and maybe that's maybe making you one person in 10,000, or even one person and

100,000. And then also, to really be good at it, you probably have to be reasonably stress tolerant, and also somewhat conscientious. So you know, people want you think, Well, why is it that smart people are at the top of dominance hierarchies? And the answer to that, in part is because they get there first. Right? I mean, everything's a race, roughly speaking. And the faster you are, the more likely you are to be at the forefront of the pack and intelligence in

large part is speed. That's not all of it is. So if you're moving towards something difficult rapidly the faster people are going to get there first. Okay, everything is a race. Yeah. I think this is like basically the definition or genesis of the word to how we use how we use race. But the fact that he defines it by speed thinking, I find it interesting it because I don't know what the right answer is. But isn't intelligence more about speed or

depth? Because you can have somebody that is quick on the draw and fast to get there. Or you can have somebody that has a deeper understanding. So when you defy interest and when you we miss wildly intelligence is very a very hard thing. To measure your hand down. Yeah, of course. Because now you got to factor in emotional intelligence. And I made the story before about ms facts with the kids. Her emotional intelligence is blows mine out of the water, right?

Because they're reading a nonverbal cues and, you know, and just, it just it just superior to mine. So what I'm telling you is, are we talking about here and like, how like deep thinking or how fast you can read your regurgitate and pull up? It's subjective, it's really subjective. But as you see, yes, it is pretty pretty defined. So, if you want to we can go to the next one. Yep. IQ of 115 110 to 115. So that's 85th to 73rd 85th percentile.

copywriter, accountant, manager, sales manager, sales, analysts, General Manager, person, purchasing agent, registered nurse, sales account executive. If you look at universities, the smartest people are there above this, who are the smartest people at university? What do you think? Mathematicians physicists and mathematicians, right, right. I can tell you who's on the other end, but I won't. Yeah, I'd like to though.

Anyway. Anyways, okay, going down the now 103 to one away to slightly above average rate 60s to 78th percentile store manager, bookkeeper, credit clerk lab tester general sales telephone sales accounting clerk, computer operator customer service rep technician clerk typist. So you see at this level people are people have some technical skill and some ability to deal with complex things. Okay, that's dead average. All right. So now we go. Where did podcasters come in around 85?

I don't know. I mean, maybe we were at the other end. I mean, they were at the top end of it. Let's get let's get to know You know what 300 is average dispatcher and a general office police patrol officer, receptionist cashier general clerical inside sales clerk meter reader printer teller data entry electrical helper 95th to 98 machinist food to partner manager quality control checker security guard unskilled labor maintenance arc

welder Dissector mechanic. Good good IQ range for relatively qualified trades people 87 to 93 messenger factory production worker assembler Food Service Worker nurse's aide warehouseman, custodian janitor material handler Packer now what you're seeing, what you're starting to see is that as you move down the hierarchy, the jobs get simpler, they're more likely to be assigned by other people or they're repetitive. Because what IQ predicts to some degree is how rapidly you can

learn something. But once you've learned it doesn't predict how necessarily how well you do at it. And so the more repetitive jobs 10 people with lower IQs are more suited to more repetitive jobs. Hello, metaverse. Yeah, get your AI goggles on, you'll be operating the same procedure over and over again all day long. And two things. So one, this made me start to think about Forrest Gump. Remember, he was on that mental retardation cut off on IQ score? If you recall the movie course, but his mama

sure they care about his education. And open up his opportunities for everything else to transplant, of course, is a fictitious move, but I'm just saying how arbitrary the score your cancer can be. And you know, who to say if he was like it was meant to retarded? You know, what would have played out? And then another thing I want to point out is the military. I just heard this recently on Tucker Carlson, they

actually lower the IQ score for entry into the military. Yeah, that's because they can't get anybody because everyone's so unhealthy. Right? That this this, as the reason why I'm bringing these up is as the requirement for a higher IQ is you're saying more needed than ever. We haven't less and less people with the necessary IQ to make it. So what do we do with those people? I'm sure there's some good ideas out there. I think we went through them before I'm laying it out by now

you're starting to crystallize. Yeah. Wow. The way thing and I guess we're going to jump into number five, under 87. Is there something? Well, no. Right? That's a big problem. And it's something our society has not addressed at all. jobs for people with IQs of less than 85 are very, very rare. So what the hell are those people supposed to do? It's like one, it's 15% of the population. What are they supposed to do?

Well, we better figure it out. Because one of the things that's happening too, is that as the as the high IQ tech geeks get a hold of the world, the demand for cognitive power is increasing, not decreasing, right? You want to be a teller, well, you know, those checkout machines, they're not so simple. You want to work at McDonald's, you think that's a simple job, you don't see robots working at McDonald's. And the reason for that is that what McDonald's workers do is too complex for

for robots to do so. Well. So this is a discussion that no one wants to have. But that's okay. It's still a problem. And it has to be dealt with. So the US government, I think I told you this at one point already, it's illegal to induct anyone into the US Army if they have an IQ of less than 83. Right. It's

about 10% of the population. Because the US Army that and they've been doing IQ testing since IQ testing began, because they want everybody they can possibly get into the Army because in peacetime, they use it as a way of moving people up the socio economic ladder. And in wartime, well, obviously, you need as many soldiers as you can get your hands on. And so you're not going to be any pickier than you have to be.

Oh, okay, so that's what we that's what we get your immigrants who come in perfect. And, and they just lowered it. I mean, he stated it at three, and I'm assuming this Carson's claim was made after this clip was made. So what he said there's not a job for people at 85. What else could you do? In the military? Yeah, I mean, I don't know. Is this is this a scale that is

used consistently? Is this actually used in hiring practices or is it just you know, anecdotally, what he's explaining to us, I think is the They probably go into a sample of people in certain occupations and see where their IQ is. But I mean, I'm just saying that we're going to have an abundance of people, there's going to be out of a job. And it's going to be out of a purpose more than a job. I mean, of course, the job is a

means of finances. But it's also a meaning of purpose. And when you don't have people that purpose, that's the scary thing. And I want to Well, I guess the the modern day version of this score is do you have a degree from a university? Doesn't it doesn't even matter what it is, you got to have that degree now. Now you're kind of baseline 100. Even if it's gender studies. That's a good point. And that's what I was saying about. That's why they use it in politics. Yeah, as a covert way of saying,

making that statement that you just made. People with IQs over 100 vote this way. And then they can leverage that it's a shame. And just one final point, before we move into the next donation segment. I want to let people know how fast automation is moving, because we don't really realize it. But do you realize that Redbox put blockbuster out of business and brow, red boxes are being put out of business? This is how fast we're moving. And MTV hasn't played videos in 35 years.

That's crazy. How I mean, cuz, yeah, try to explain blockbuster to your kid. But I mean, even even just 2007 is when the first iPhone came out, look at what's happened that that's the metric for me. That's, that's when everything started to happen. That's when we got increase in all kinds of good and bad things. And talk about your evolution. The human species was not prepared and still not equipped for what smartphones do and algorithms

that control the experience. It's very, it's it's not healthy. But one last point is this. If we they really, truly wanted to be fascist, thank you say, Okay, your smartphone can only access meaningful and beneficial information. The same thing with diet. But they didn't make it that way. Because they were setting you up to fail. Yeah. I want to drill that thing through is that they're setting you up to fail. This is the thresher,

this is the gauntlet. And it's stacked against you to fail, because everybody can't make it. They've got they they see a necessity to call. We got to do better with more people. Yeah, I understand that. There's some people out there who need my service. Or any people out there who are weak. people out

there who are aware. people out there who attack just need. A few more people as we wind out our producers for episode 85 of Mo facts with Adam curry. Good interesting note from Cameron Rose, who came in with $45 and says Hi, Mo and Adam, I have to say I was greatly disappointed to hear your pontificating on Darwin and his seminal work The Origin of Species. You could not

have been more wrong about Darwin and his views. And I suggest you do a lot more research before discussing any topic touching on evolutionary theory again, thank you for telling us what to do. This was especially especially embarrassing because I know it does not represent the usual quality of research and insight you both normally provide. For the record, the word race was explicitly used in his book as a synonym for species or variety, and has nothing to do with human

ethnicity. Had genes already been discovered? I have no doubt he would have used that word instead being the more accurate term for what he was describing. Otherwise, keep up the great work that you both do. GBG All right. Let me let me approach this one. Doesn't matter. Did hasn't it? I disagree. By the way, I can read the title. We read the whole title. It's very clear what it says but okay. Let's say it was just about animals, species varieties. His work is being used for

eugenicist purposes. So it doesn't matter if if he meant it that way or not. It's been used that way. And I'll respond back to this later ask the question then how to him use the term race is his quote to say at some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races Oh, A man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace throughout the world the savage races. Charles Darwin, the standard, man, we know. We'd be happy to hear back from you. Yeah. Thank you, Cameron.

We appreciate it. Appreciate the pushback. We always appreciate pushback. Dale spots $40 Thanks for doing the work on these deep dives always thought I looked at things with an open mind, but I've been missing the other perspective. Everybody misses perspective. Brother. Dale has another one. So he's Oh, this is interesting. Another $40 Yeah, he belong. I'll have to put him up in the in the executive producer category, which is no problem. Let me just make sure I mark that that that happens.

monad um, I sent my first donation forgot to let you know I'm no longer a deadbeat. So I figured I'd donate again to be d deadbeat. Thanks for all your work pulling back the curtain. Of course, we'll do that for you. Congratulations. You're no longer dead. The 3333 from jamesy jamesy says Job well done. Thank you, Susan. Tillet 25 keen, Davidson $25 Jared Wescott. $25, and says, You have changed the way I view a lot of things in the world. Not a lot, but it is what I can show to do to show the

appreciation. Thank you. Now, again, Jared, this is the whole idea of value for value. If it's not, it may not seem like a lot to who it seems like it's a lot for you. You just said that. So it is a lot and therefore very valuable and appreciated. James Brown 24 at Sam Schmuck, he sends us $23.06 This is interesting. The Rothschilds are big into gardening. Thanks for going straight to the root of what's going on in the last episode. That's good to know. William Torres. $20. He says the

white coats are coming. Yeah, no kidding. Mike Riley, Mike Riley comics $20. Thanks for what you're doing here to your continued success. Mike, thank you so much. Matthew Weaver. $20 Philip II $20 He says just finished up episode 84. Good stuff. Keep it coming. Please. John Paul show farm fields send us a row of Canadian ducks 2222 and dollar rates for the value received here at the farm and Cavin, Ontario. Thanks, mon Adam. I am no longer a deadbeat. That's right. Congratulations.

You're no longer a deadbeat. Derek Burch Birch 1427 He says have appropriated your logo to hit more people in the mouth here in Toronto. Please accept this small donation for now. You've been on fire where the last few episodes and depths you put into it. Keep up the great work. Oh, ds laughs T's laughs He does a lot of end of show mixes for no agenda. Thanks. DS. David Vargas. $10 Thank you. Thank you

mo karma, please got it. You've got Scott Webb needs another reminder that value for value is it's in the eye of the receiver. Sorry, I'm poor. He says Well, first of all, I'm sorry to hear that. But thank you because $10 is a lot of value if you're poor. So this is how we view it and we appreciate it. No need to apologize at all. Roar shark and Rory white photography $10.

Thank you. Now we have a very long note here from Seth Peterson who says I've been a listener to the podcast after hearing Adam discuss it the first time on the Rogan podcast. I truly enjoy and appreciate your takes on the topics you discuss. After listening to an episode, I often felt that I should send a message regarding my thoughts and your additional resources which were relevant to the episode but have not done so

until now. As you discuss the concepts of the origin of white supremacy and the ideas of those in power looking down on everyone else. This book came to mind white trash the 400 year Untold History of class in America by Nancy Eisenberg. It's a dry read something I would expect to be read in the college

class. That said there are some interesting aspects and topics worth noting, in relation to your most recent episode, the main concepts which she discusses that I thought were relevant were the ideas of the people who were sent by to the Americas by the British elite and how the people were viewed by the upper class. Long and short before America was a country that people on the land were considered waste due to not

having purpose which was deemed useful or beneficial. And she writes out the poor often called Mud eaters were seen as inferior breed as in a sub species of human. Nancy does a great job of documenting our sources so I'm sure you could do a deep dive of interested Lastly, I finally got off my got off my duff and started a monthly pay pal subscription. Please keep up the great work, and I wish you the best Seth Peterson $10 Thank you

very much. Seth $10. Yes, I must say that this will respond to him that sources already own file discussing baked $10 from the following people Dwayne spelling Spellman, Jr. Arsa nomics, Eric Runkle, and Andrew Butterfield, Aaron Sneed, Dave Jones. I don't that's our Dave Jones. Hello Dave Jones $9.99 from Benjamin Bateman who says, Oh, come on. I guess that's good. I don't know. Johnny Johnny hip Well, Oh 9.99

A Gretzky donation because he was the greatest. Interesting. I don't know why, but I like it. Joshua Goodson $5 Thanks for all the insights, Brandon glass with five have some quick bucks. We appreciate it. Moises Hernandez $4.20. And of course, we find Terry the humans subscription killer with his $4.11. And finally, $2 from E and E. Thank you all, so much for supporting Moe facts with Adam curry episode number 85. It is highly appreciated. Remember, every episode takes effort, we need

some type of value return to continue. All you do is just determine that for yourself, send it off, you can find all the information on our donation page at mo facts.com Or go directly to that mo fund me.com MOEFUND me.com And thank you again for sponsoring episode 85 of Mo facts with Adam curry. All right, so now we gotta go to the OG This is Charles Murray.

And he was the co author of the bell curve. And with Richard Herrnstein. So we got to go this is where a lot of this IQ standard deviation gap between the races stem from. So I guess we can go ahead and jump into number 29. Okay, Thomas Sol has claimed that the difference in IQ between races is unimportant because it increases in all of them. It is only that, for example, whites began to increase earlier than blacks, we all get higher results and IQ

tests as time goes by. What do you think about that? Tom Sol was referring there to the Flynn effect that and the argument goes like this, the basically the black mean right now is about where the white mean was in 1940, if you equate these IQ scores over time, and that's, that's a tricky phenomenon. That's a tricky thing to say, because it does require you to assume that you're looking at real changes

in cognitive functioning. But Tom Sol, who is both a friend and a person I admire greatly, has said other things about the the IQ difference where he's convinced that it is a source of a lot of its sources, a lot of cultural attributes. And to me, I don't think I need to argue with that question. Okay. So the reason why I like this conversation with him until Thomas oil, which we're going to hear him speak in a minute, is this is too academic, they have mutual respect for each other.

But Charles Murray, he's really pointing out just what he's reading scientifically. But he doesn't really make a statement, whether it's nature or nurture. But it was so triggering, that people don't even want to have the conversation. And I'm like, if you can't have the conversation, you're never ever get to the root of the problem. And that's the problem with the things being shut away. And this is why I look at the Boulais.

Because they don't want to have this conversation. Or even let this information get the light of day because they're different. I've made it out, you know, saying I'm the superior of my gene, and I'm saying my race I have the superior genes. Right. So they don't want if his narrative is nurtured, that's more competition for them. No, no, they can they can never admit to nurture Of course not that that that goes against their whole nature, in fact,

right. Good point. So yeah, so I just want to make clear it lay out this point about Charles Murray that he just stating what his as a scientist what his findings are saying. But it allows for at least seen before Jared Taylor, this Heiko me spin them in a way to push a narrative, you know, and that's often what happens even with Darwin, you know, people took it, the Germans took it and spin it and didn't do anything with

it. As they learn from the Americans. We've, we've seen Yeah, so let's go ahead and get into the second part of this clip. If I were to differ with Tom at all, and I'm not even sure that how much we differ on this it would go as follows. The gap has not reduced. When they first started to give IQ tests back in the early part of the 20th century, the gap was one standard deviation in statistical terms or 15 IQ points, which means for those of you who aren't statisticians,

which I hope is almost everybody. I say that because I don't think being a statistician is necessarily the right way to spend your life. That if you have somebody who has 15 Point IQ difference, and there are one standard deviation among the above the mean, that means that there are the 85th percentile 84th percentile of of all people who take the test compared to the person that the mean versus the 50th percentile. So it's not a small difference. It's a pretty good size difference.

That hasn't really changed. There was a some narrowing in certain kinds of tests during the 1970s and 1980s. And those were mostly academic tests. And that narrowing seemed to be real. There was some narrowing in the LSAT. There was a narrowing of some others tests in the most purely IQ tests, things like the Wechsler and the Stanford Binet and the rest of them, the most recent renormalize of those tests continue to show a one standard deviation difference.

Well, yeah, if you keep reading norming them and jiggering the numbers? Yeah, I think you can continue to show all standard deviation 15 points lower, Whoa, no good, you must be black. And this is the danger of affirmative action in this current state. Because when you say we need somebody with lower qualification, lower grades to be on par, or put in the same position as someone with just a just somebody still doesn't

numbers out there. Okay, we need to let somebody that has 100 IQ, and an end grades that match that IQ, and where the normal IQ is 120 and engraves, that match that, that kind of buying into this nurse nature, situation, are saying we understand what we need to grade them on a curve. And that's why I agree with Clarence Thomas. And this is why he's such a huge have a huge issue with it, because what it does is it lends credence to the fact that oh, we're inherently dumber.

There's another way to go with this. And what comes to mind is

Kurt Vonnegut's Harold Berger on Have you ever read that or maybe seen the short movie? No, I haven't seen. So the concept is you have these obvious, lesser people. But because we've introduced equity, and this is a great story, we've introduced equity, so therefore the fantastic you know, very talented ballerina now has to dance with, you know, with like with one shoe. So she gets a handicap so she'll be so

everyone will be as good. The guy who's Thank you, the guy who's super strong and is the the guy who is the best in the mill. Well, he's too strong. So they have to put a weight jacket on him to slow him down. That's that's the other way to go. Right? So what you're making is my lineage or my genetics a handicap? Yeah, it was because you had to bring it's not let's elevate you up to where you need to be. Is let's bring down everybody else. Yes to your handicap. You know, what is

yours? That's Destin. Isn't that also what golf is? It's not how golf works. Right? I mean, it's called a hat. It's literally called a handicap. Yeah. Yeah, but this is the problem. But a lot of people you know, get busy find benefit from this affirmative action in these spots. And, and like I say, I experienced this in corporate America. It was Oh, come tell us your sad story,

your sad race story. In the HR department. Yeah. That's what I was talking about that those? What was the I forget the name of the diversity and inclusion? Di is what I call it? Yes. It's more appropriate, but you're like, Okay, we'd like you to tell your sad black man story so everyone can hear this and understand your plight. But guess who else had groups? The disabled? Yeah, the elderly.

You know, I mean, I can speak a little bit more freely about like I said, the Indians didn't have a group and empowerment group. The Ages didn't have an empowerment group. Aren't they minorities? Why there's all of a sudden there has to be the Hispanics, the blacks, the disabled, the elderly, the you know, And the gays. I had one, two, really? Yeah. So I'm, I'm just saying that when people give you support, you got to be

suspicious about that support. Because is it? Sympathy? Now we got to go back to talking about sympathy might were higher creatures. So we have to have sympathies for these lesser lesser than beings? Yes, of course. So this is why I was adamant about critical race theory, because this is how they were going to try to teach it like you have a disability. Your race is a disability. Now, let me help you. Right, which No self respecting person with an actual disability wants to be

pity and has sympathy for, right. It's like when Latrina Dan got knocked out his chair, he wanted to get back up in the chair yourself, you know, saying like nobody, even if you have a legit disability, but they want to, they want to bacon into the education system, that race is a disability. And I find that very troubling. But also also critical race theory. It teaches that white being white as a disability depending on how you look at it, explain, I want to make sure I fully understand you.

Because the teaching goes, you're white, you have white privilege, you're inherently racist. That's a big part of critical race theory. True, I can see I can just depends on which way you want to look at I of course, I understand what you're saying. But I'm looking at the St. Look, I'm supposedly, the bottom of the barrel. It's not true, because the black man has already gone, the black man is done. Now. It's the SIS white man, then it's the SIS, gay, white man. And no one wants to

be that everyone hates us. We're the patriarchy. We're the we're the it's all it's all our fault. And now I want us to fully explain it. I agree with you. Because it's like, you know what? Because I'm gonna show you how you make it. Flip it. You growing up in that cold, dark, indigenous environment. Now I'm gonna say something as triggering, but I'm gonna say it how they will say it coming out

of those caves? Yeah, no, I'm just kind of like what Jared Taylor was kind of lean into, you know, like, kind of, we're coming out of those. That's right, coming out of that cold cold cave. Right. So you can't help that you willing to kill other people that way? That's kind of like what you're saying. Wow, that's crazy. That's amazing how they could cut both ways. It works both ways, doesn't it? Yeah. I mean, because tell me how black parents think about critical race theory. What is

just your black parent? What you pulled your kids out of school? What was your main priority? What was your main issue? Just one line? What was your main issue with critical race theory? victimization of your kids? Yes. And so for the white parents, they were sick and tired of being told that their children are assholes. Right genetically genetically a genetic assholes, you because you're white, you're the fucking problem. So it was beautiful. It created horrible tension between the children on

an ongoing basis. But we all looked at it from our own perspective, which is interesting. All while nobody's learning. Okay, all right, the one place where you should be elevating your intelligence, because I know now we will teach you about grooming and CRT and why you're a bad person or why you're disabled. And so and it goes on and on and on. So let's go ahead and get into 31. And you can say that that's because of cultural reasons. You

can say it's because of genetic reasons, you can say it's because of a combination of both. We don't know the answer to that question. But where Dickon, I guess would draw our line in the sand and say we think the data are quite clear on this is that the wiggle room for this difference has proved to be small, it's proved to be a very intractable difference. That has not responded to a lot of attempts to narrow it. And at the time, we wrote the book on the race chapter. And we talked

about what had been a narrowing in the 70s and 80s. But we also saw that narrowing seem to have stopped. And so we said you know it's a good time to reserve judgment about whether the narrowing will continue or whether it won't, because we just don't know yet. It's now been seven years since then. If anybody knows of any data, which indicates it's continuing to narrow I'd love to hear about it. I know of some other recent data that come out, which indicates that it's not. So it

is an intractable difference. It's not a result of cultural bias in the tests, it's large enough to be. It's not the kind of thing that should be ignored. It's also not the kind of thing which should drive your opinions of people. When you see somebody of one race or another just as when you see somebody who's an Asian, you shouldn't automatically assume they're smarter than you, even though they may very well be. Because there's enough overlaps that that's a very bad predictor for

individuals. That's pretty much my reading on where the data stand on the black white issue, right? Hey, it's not everybody. There's some there's some smart black people. Right? And that's kind of why they're different. That's why I'll just say, yeah, if there's one, they're different, they're different, you know, majority are dumb. Now, don't get me wrong. 1515 said, deviation points. Right. So I mean, this is how they use science, but they never

have a question for the important. No, I never have an answer for the important question. What's causing it? Right? I don't know. I don't know. I can't tell you that. It's like, we're the comic. And we can't tell you that we can tell you everything else. Kind of the bane of the whole issue. That's the basis of the whole issue, but they can't answer it. All these big brains. They can't figure out what what one thing he said was, it's not a cultural difference and cultural not due

to cultural bias. My thing is, I think it's due to culture, or the lack of culture. Now, and people can claim certain things with caution. I don't think we have a culture anymore. I think it was destroyed. I think that that narrowing because he said it was a narrowing. So basically, the Flynn effect everybody was moving on to saying like, all ties are a tie rod is all boats. Right? Right. But then there was a trajectory change, that blacks were kind of gaining, closing the gap. And

then all of a sudden, it stopped. So that doesn't explain genetics to me. Cuz if you're, if you're genetically dumb, you're dumb, you're saying that you can do about it. If you want to say it, like it's high, and all of a sudden, in the 80s and 90s, right, when you had the real effects of no man in the house, and the change in the family structure in the black community was starting to really take hold. You saw the gap, the closing and the gaps and start to widen again.

Right. But it was external factors. Obviously, it was factors that were put in by governments and society. Right, when also personal responsibility, you can't factor that out. But once again, if we're going to say that the school system can, is complicit and grooming children and oppressing any kind of movement, see, this is where it thinking it's kind of like, when you say, oh, there's parents teacher calm their, their parent, teacher conference, FBI, and you're

seeing it coming in. You think they weren't doing that? And then you feel like, we got to realize we're all on the same boat here. But I mean, you can't force people to see that. But that's kind of like a running theme in the show that we do is that we're all we all being pushed in the same corner are. All right, so now he mentioned Thomas oil or soul how you

pronounce it, her different pronunciations. He's gonna speak, basically countering Charles Murray's point. Is there a relationship between or an important relationship between race and mental capacity? What capacity is, if you mean by capacity potential, then who

knows? Because you can't measure potential currently. And I suspect for the next 100 years or so probably, what you can recognize and measure is capacity, developed capabilities, the measure those SATs and stuff like that, but but potential you cannot. So when it comes to race, how does that play into the measurements that we have today? I'm not sure what what you mean by that? Can you Is there a correlation between IQ that what we have and what we're able to measure today? And race?

Oh, sure. I mean, there's, and there's always been among all sorts of groups around the world. I mean, people in the Hebrides islands of Scotland have the same IQs as blacks, the United States, and probably for similar reasons, because they're an isolated culture. And people with eyes from isolated cultures tend not to have the same achievements as people who are in cultures that have a sort of larger cultural, cultural

universe to draw draw upon. So the data are good for measuring what is likely to happen with a given person at a given time, under given circumstances, what is the ultimate potential at the time, at the moment of conception, no one has come close to anything like that. isolated culture. Yeah. And the greatest sample that is and you've experienced it, even digitally, we're isolated culture, Black Twitter, a black sweat, right, you only get a

certain amount of ideas that lean a certain way. Now, one of these days, we have to really go deep on hip hop. Because you you

make you mentioned. I mean, this is obvious, it's obvious what's, you know, this has been captured and hijacked. That was the mechanism. That was the delivery system, right? As if you want to put it in their terms of weapons. Hip hop was the delivery system. Hip Hop itself is just like a gun. He was saying it doesn't use an inanimate object, you know, it's like a gun. It depends on whose hands it is. And what, what ammo it's loaded with. Right? It's

exactly an example of this isolated culture. And I don't have the clips, because we've not really clippable I'm sure you've seen it, but maybe not the little black boy hitting the police. Yeah, of course, I've seen that. Yeah, you bitch. It's a four year old, four year old, right? That's a child that grew up in isolated culture, and has been indoctrinated in a way of thinking. So it's all the child has seen is obvious, right?

And the way that he is same, so third world is to me, the way that whole scene was played out it like you were in like a third world somewhere, which is isolated, you know, what makes it the third world is isolated from you know, industry. And you know, and the benefits and industrialization industrialization. So yeah, so that's a, that's a prime example

of isolated culture right there. And that's, they want to make it more isolated does not to harp on the point about CRT all the way around school, music, entertainment, your social media

feed your recommendations, like I said before, Netflix even changes the cover of the artwork for the shows based off of they think you're black or white. Is that true? I didn't know that. This is very true. I have a while ago does that I have a white Netflix? Because I will I'll tell my wife this and she said you bullcrapping me. But what they'll do is if they think you're a black, they'll show all the black characters in the show. No matter how small their

role is in the show. Wow. This is how vicious this night? It's of course, it makes so much sense. But I had not even considered that that was happening with Netflix. But it makes so much sense of course. Right? Because I was watching I was saying something that I had clicked on my wife she hadn't logged in or her account or whatever. It was like looking at everybody was black. And it was

like a to you got all the white guys. You got all the white guys on your you've been hanging out with me too much. Man, man, man, man, man. It's what you're watching to me in the wrong category. But yeah, they. Yeah, it persuades you to stay in this isolated culture. Oh, and I mean, we were used to it from social media networks. I, I hadn't considered that Netflix was doing it. Of course they are. Right. Alright, so now we have to ask the question, and Neely

fuller Jr. is going to answer it for us. Our white people, the smartest people on the planet. Follow logic don't even follow. People don't follow organizations don't follow. Follow logic. Logic game with the universe is the one thing we haven't been using. Because the white supremacy has always beat us from logic, meaning cause and effect. Does that mean that all white people are racist?

Language now, you never say that. You just say to those who are in those who are smarter and more powerful than those who aren't the white people who believe in racism and the smartest people on the planet, say Good. Smart. Now what is smart smart is being able to do what you want to do, if you want

to do it. better, smarter. And so that fits that criteria. The white people who believe in white supremacy on this planet do exactly what they want to do with anybody they want to do it with who is non white and nobody has figured out a way to stop them from doing it, no matter how incorrect it is, and if it's a white supremacist doing it, most likely it is incorrect. It's unjust. The system of racism itself is unjust a system of non justice. That's what it is.

But they do it. Yeah, we've we've heard this type of stuff from Neely fuller Jr. before on the show, of course. Right. But what we have this app is this globalist white supremacist system. The people who run it artists, smartest people on the planet. At this time now, that's not that's not static. But if we allow them, yeah, well, thank you for like you said, like you always bring up if we use their apps and eat their food, they suggest to us and take the medicine, they

suggest to us, yeah, we're gonna die. But they're smarter than us. If they can convince us to do it at our own detriment. This is something you have to achieve and better than you can change. You know, it's even better than that. They've set it up so that we convince ourselves. It's continuously reinforced. Exactly. And that's the trick of it. Is that Nas go back to little Adam, like, it's so seductive and subtle. That you felt the way that you didn't know why you felt that way.

Right. It was a it's my, it's like asking a fish like the water warming and the fish was water. He was like the system that we live in is so we're so immersed in it, that we don't even realize how we're being manipulated by it. And if that's the case, and we continue to live in it, and we got to agree that they're the smartest people on the planet, and we just said was done to us. Or we could do the opposite. And I just want to make one more point is that Milly Fuller's definition of

smart is really effective. Right? Effective is producing,

producing a decided, I mean, you decided to do something and you can do it the desired result? Right, decisive and desired effect. Hence, the reason why I'm so big on the Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, because aren't they we could do is change our habits, they can be more effective or a smart for nearly Fuller's definition, to combat this system, right? Is we have to change our habits. And you've been on this for a long time i are off the grid habits chair, now you're on our eating

habits. You know, I'm big on our voting habits. Together, we can survive mo right? We're smart together two of us. Because the seven habits are saying you got to be the first one is be proactive. The second was begin with the end in mind. Third is put first thing first thing, think win win. Seek first to understand then to be understood synergize and Stop

and Shop and install. And that's why I believe that's the only thing I really think can beat the system and white supremacy is to become effective, because what was the definition of cause? These are the definitions matter? What was the definition of syphilis again? Lacking and resource resourcefulness? Yes, was resolving the ability to meet situations capable of devising ways to meet the Ways and Means. So if you can't devise ways and means you're shiftless, you're selfless wish

you're holding their definition to be true. Yeah, so i That's why I don't subscribe to being ineffective. And I definitely don't subscribe to be genetically false. No, I actually embrace my genetics. And that's what triggered people a lot because it's like, how dare you but you're different. You're different. Actually, I'm not. What was different was the nurturing process. And me, of course, that's why I want to highlight I can you know him like, oh, you know, I'm different. That kind of thing.

No, there's nothing different about me, it doesn't affect it. I had two people that purposely made me and read me. Part of the 5% Yeah, the talented 10th. So, alright, we gotta get a double dose of nearly fuller.

This is him speaking more on the One World Government. Why people collectively are the smartest people in the known universe. Are you like eff apples, okay, to a group like this, sitting here among all these African books and whatnot, and among the white people or the white supremacist and they are smarter than the white people who are not and they also the most powerful, and also white supremacist, the most powerful religion that this world has ever seen. nothing

matches it. Not Islam, not Hinduism, Judaism, Buddhism, none of it. Confucianism. None of these religions match the religion of white supremacy. Because that's what white supremacy means. It means the frame. It doesn't mean for carloads of skinheads ran down the street shouting, nigger this and nigger that the white supremacist would have you believe that they are going to white supremacist. But the number is not very large compared to the number of black,

brown, red and yellow people on this planet. But they are still the most powerful people in the known universe at this particular fan. And the smartest because you can't be dumb and run a package like white supremacy on anybody. This law. Yeah, right. Oh, yeah. So you can't you can't be done. So that's the thing people need to stop going along with it. Or they're right, and you deserve what you get. Either way, they're right. You prove them wrong. And I'm in the business

of proving them wrong. And like I said, that's why we have to be effective. That's why I identify these things. I highlight these

things, but it doesn't affect me in the way of stopping me from being productive. And if anything else, this is what I want to share with other people, because I'll share it with my children. And the great thing my dad ever told me. And I never forget it. We were running somewhere. So I don't know where we're going. But. But he had noticed I was kind of like, when my friends got around, I get like, kind of quiet down. And then they got out the car and he was like, You're not better than

anybody else. But nobody is better than you. And that totally changed my outlook, you know, saying because like this humble thing, be humble. Oh, not humble. I'm polite. But I'm not humble. Because that's what people want you to turn down your life, you know, saying because it offends them or doesn't fit in the narrative? No, no, no. I'm polite. I'm not humble. And that's troubling to people. When you have confidence like that.

Where does that humble come from, uh, telling people that they have to be humble. Where does it come from? It's because you don't want to, you don't want to stand out the same thing, like what you were saying about hospice CRT teachers. Be humble. It's the same, it's the same mentality or same message. Right? Right. So you don't want to embrace your strengths. And that's also a socialist message. Marxist message, it's all the same. Yeah,

correct. We all one, we're all equal, you know, that kind of thing, you know. Now, I'm not gonna say the key thing is I'm not better than anybody else. That's the first part. But then the second part, nobody's better than me. So that means bringing on Let's compete, and I have no and really the way Rassie races, and I want to be able to point is, the way race should be is like the Olympics, everybody, you know, saying everybody comes together, and we challenge each other, to see who was good at

what. And out of that, you know, saying, you know, you get to see who, okay, there's the Kenyans kick ass at long distance running, you know, saying, you know, wherever you're saying that, you know, Jamaican bobsled team is good, you know, or whatever it was. No, I'm just saying it's like, certain groups are better at certain things that make them supreme overall, is that you know, is the fact they want you to be humbled and turn your light down? And that's what a lot of these children are

being taught like, oh, no, don't be smart. You know, you don't want to want to make everybody mad at you by being smart. Now, isn't that also a part of the early programming with the talk? No, because the talk is framed in a sense of this is reality. He's not saying like, this is reality, this can happen. But you still don't live in, you're not in a constant state of fear, or dumbing yourself down. It's just like, This is reality of

something that can happen. And what it's not like a nightmare sitting out every day, but this is, this is how that little boy got to the place where he is it. Right? Is the constant manipulation and what's the word? I'm looking for? indoctrination. That's how you get my dad is to not have to talk with me every day. are like whoa, I'm glad you made it. How All day the cops could have killed you know, it's like it's like a, like a condom, like use a condom talk, you know, saying

like, it's that kind of talk. It's like, hey, you know, this kind of thing happened. So that's it's nuanced, but it's a little different. But yeah, so we got to talk about it. The Uber man. Are you familiar with this? The overmanned? Nie J

meets je ne champ. No, I'm not familiar with Nietzsche, but not really. Okay, let's go and get into 3040. And this is this is this is, I think, where white supremacy stems from section 26. The over man. Nietzsche once said that he philosophized with a hammer. By that he did not mean anything crude, like a sledge hammer that smashes things he had in mind a delicate hammer, like the one a piano tuner uses to strike keys on a finely built musical instrument to see which notes

ring clear, and which are discordant or muddy. In writing his philosophy, Nietzsche intended for his words to be like that delicate hammer on your soul. When you read them, how does your soul respond? Does it vibrate clearly? Or does it wobble uncertainly? When you hear that God is dead? Do those words cause you to shrink inside and fill with a squishy panic, or do they strike a clear, pure liberating note that heralds the beginnings of the tremendous symphony that you can become?

God is dead. So we must become gods and create our own values. Yet most people are afraid of legislating for themselves. They know there is inequality and risk out there in the big bad world. So they want to let some higher power shoulder that responsibility. But Nietzsche says for some precious few among us, that realisation that God is dead galvanizes every fiber of their being. They respond by feeling both passionately and solemnly. I will become the author. I will create I will

embrace the responsibility joyously. I will move beyond good and evil and create a new magnificent set of values. And this is the overmanned Uberman Yes. Nice J I think Nietzsche Nietzsche. Okay, and then not see all my credibility out the window. Yeah, really? Practice. Oh, man, I knew it. I know. edify episode. Please, hey, is this how I pronounce it? I may be wrong to Nietzsche. No way your your credibility going through your shot. It's

shot lot riding on this. No, but this is from the audio book. Nice. J. I can't get it, whatever. And the Nazis and nurses are read by the author, Dr. Stephen Hicks. So basically, Hitler, this was Hitler's ideology. He borrowed from that once again, we're not saying the person prescribed to the thoughts of Hitler. But this is the weapon weaponization of thought to fulfill a narrative and basically if God is dead, I

can become a god. Or you can look at another way God has to be dead so we can become Gods Well, that's an that's a good way of looking at it. And this is why Darwinism is a huge part of atheists thought process no offense to hate atheists but this is it's a lot hinging on Darwin and his existence or not. Because there's really really no counter argument to creationism other than dominance that I know of. There might be other ones but all the other ones Lance is some supreme being no matter what

your theology is, right? So yeah, this is why this him this hand is a lot on this. But yeah, God must be dead so they can become gods and this is what we're seeing right now. That changing of definitions Yes. The Oh no, we're not a recession. Yeah, that's God like behavior right there. That's a premacy at his bet. No. Cuz I said so we that's that's that because I said so. It's like, how do you how do you mean we're not in a recession? Now this net gain of function, it's

like I mean, what do you see them cotton? You're starting to see the mass slipping veil come off. Oh, do do as I tell you to do you define it the way I define it. The dictionary is written in pencil and that's why I was no more leaning on definitions this time because we got to be clear on what we're defining If not then what? What world do we live in?

You need definitions? Yeah. And that's why they have a serious attack on you know, it's the reason why they're attacking in dictionary the way they are. Because they're redefining everything a woman you know, I mean, we're to the point now I mean think how God like you got to be to say okay woman has beginning been here since the beginning of time. But where are we gonna redefine it? So like that's awesome. That's awesome. That's awesome Kahuna is right

here, boy, I'm out. Alright, so I guess we can go and get into

what we start with 34 Yeah. 35 Such an individual raise mankind to a higher level of existence, he will be the Uber match the Superman or over man. The entire history of mankind Nietzsche believes will have prepared the Uber Mensch for his great creative adventure. In himself, he will embody the best of the past. The physical vitality and exuberance of the past master types will flow through his veins. But Nietzsche also credits the Judeo Christian

tradition for its internalized spiritual development. By turning all of its energy inward and stressing ruthless self discipline and self denial, that tradition has been a vehicle for

the development of a stronger, more capable type of spirit. The new masters will thus combine the physical vitality of the aristocratic masters with the spiritual ruthlessness of the slave priests of Christianity. As Nietzsche put it, in one memorable phrase, the new masters will be quote, Caesar's with the Soul of Christ, unquote. That's really interesting. I did not know that Uber manche because of course I know Hitler and his Uber match Uber Haasch.

Having grown up in in the Netherlands, I didn't know it came from Nietzsche. Yeah. Superman. This is super superior. The premise Uber above all, yeah. This is their this is their ideology. And but they say, like Caesars with the heart of Christ. Yeah. How about what that means is we're going to be tyrants, but we're going to do it lovingly. Yeah, we're going to make sure you, you love to eat bugs, to make sure it's our own. So that's so lovely. That's

what he means. Like, we're gonna do some bad stuff to you. And you're gonna like oh, and we're gonna take you and tell you we love you're gonna like it. Yeah. Oh, man. That's That's what forms the the Stockholm Syndrome. Because you like these people love us. They're trying to save us, you know, the end the world's coming, you know, climate change with this mask on. Right? Take this shot. It's for your own good. We know it doesn't work. But you know, we knew it wasn't

gonna work. I've told you we needed out. We meant well, we wanted to make sure you were safe. That's Wow, man like a man. Right? But it's amazing to see like the masks come off. Yeah, and it was a let's go on blade play. last clip. Now I'll wrap it up with a point I want to make. We cannot say ahead of time what new values the masters will create. Not being Uber mentioned ourselves, we do not have the

power to decide for them or even predict. But Nietzsche does indicate strongly what broad direction the new masters will take. First, the over man will find his deepest instinct and let it be a tyrant. The creative source of the future lies in instinct, passion and will to put the point negatively, the over man will not rely much on Reason. Reason, of course, is

the favorite method of modern scientific man. But Nietzsche holds that reason is an artificial tool of weaklings, those who need to feel safe and secure, build fantasy orderly structures for themselves. Instead, instincts are the deepest parts of your nature. And to the extent that you feel a powerful instinct welling up within you, you should nurture it and let it dominate. For from that spring flows true

creativity and true exaltation. Quote, The Great man is great owing to the free play and scope of his desires, and to the yet greater power that knows how to press these magnificent monsters into service, unquote. So this is what we see clearly with the trans situation. Yeah. I identify as identify, not as you know, and it's not a knock against Trint. What I'm just saying is We see what we all thought was logic and reason and an undefined definition. But if

you're over man, no, no like, don't apply to me. I can be whatever I want to be. And the point I was gonna make was your saw this play out in a movie. Superman versus Batman.

I wish I'd seen it more. Sorry. Cuz Superman, it was Superman. Let's see Superman represented over man wishes literally that's that's the devil man is Uber man. Yeah. Right. He was thought bring about good. And it didn't matter the chaos it called, you know, when Superman or you blow up buildings in Rome I ever look at how many people are Superman. Right? I mean, like, right on to save one person. I mean, he

nuts. But, and Batman was like, No, you got to be within law and reason in law, I'm saying and that's kind of thing and very interesting movie, if you watch it, that was the subplot or the underlying theme of that movie. Like, once you transcend earth and all it's bound. As Superman day you can do whatever you want to you can in the name, in the name of goodness. And that's that Caesar with the heart of Christ kind of thing. Which, which is exactly what some of our leaders are dear

leaders today are doing acting like super people. Right? Like, it was just a small exchange about, you know, there's a bill to ban the sale of AR fifteens. But in this bill, there's all kinds of carve outs for Department of Education, the Internal Revenue Service, Department of Agriculture, they not only are allowed to purchase AR fifteens, they have quite the Arsenal's and

millions and billions around. Yeah, when this came up, and you know, the answer was like, Hey, what is the what is the, you know, what aren't the Department of Agriculture and it's supposed to help the farmers. Department of Education is supposed to help children? Oh, yeah. But they have their own policing unit. So it's very obvious they need to have guns, and not even thinking about why do they need a policing unit? And that is that is that arrogance that that

we're supreme? We know what's good for you.

Oh, my final note, let me drive home to two points that help people at home stay sane in what you're about to witness. Because this is we've been going through this why supremacy operates all the two things. One, don't be confused. They're confused. You know, like why would why would ours need guns and bullets? You know? Don't be confused. They're confused. And number two, cos I say so. Right. That's that's the Altair index there. Yeah. Cuz I

say what why was why we changed it because I say so. Why does not inflation because I say so. Why not and NAS how the system operates? Expert it's the expert class. It's trust the science trust the experts because they say so. Right? because I say so. Well, I think we're learning if it contradicts what I said last time. Yes. Yeah, and I think we're slowly some people are starting to learn that maybe they're full of shit. Certainly the like masks

vaccines working, not working. Inflation. You get enough of these missiles and people start to say well you said so but you were kind of wrong. I hold this Shut up. Shut up and get your house get canceled can't get to get ready. All right. So that's my wrap. I will lose our love and I have a feeling we'll be continuing this trend. This is not over. We have more to discuss here when it comes to the American eugenics. And American Nazis because we got it we got to keep on that

one. Yeah, but as I always say, pay attention to everything. And

the truth will reveal itself. Dan, we look forward to revealing more than next time on mo facts with Adam curry. Thank you so much mo I had another blast. Same as well, Adam, take care, everybody. We'll see you next time here on mo fax with Adam curry. Mothers a modern today and I knock envying mom. My mother was an old time and though she was quite basic. And she loved me because I was our baby.

And she wanted to protect me. And I remember my first love affair and somehow or another the whole darn thing went wrong my mother had some great advice so I thought I put it in the words of this song she told me she said strong strong strong the strong strong the strong survive I can hear us right now only the strong survive only the strong you got to be strong. You better hold the straw with your head down I wouldn't let him know who we are. Why should he be