The Enemies On The RIGHT | Mironchuck LIVE Ep.10

Music. The. Music. The. The. The. The. The. Ladies and gentlemen, dance Monsieurs mirror and chads mirror and chads mirror, chads mirror and chuckles. Welcome to Mirror and Chuck live. See, we could do that again after ratings start. We hear folks with banger of a show, absolute banger about to

drop. I was going to do this yesterday, but I thought I had AI spent some time thinking about the political Politico piece and information about the Young Republicans GC being outed by Politico and revealing that there are some leaks inside the Young Republican leadership.

Allegedly. Anyways, we'll get into all those stories in a second, but my initial, well, I was going to initially say, I realize it's like this one's a tender one, this one's, this one's a tricky one because a lot of people's emotions are running high on this and I understand why. And so we're going to try, we're going to try to thread the needle a little bit on this one because I, I don't think there's any winning on, on either side here.

And mostly because people don't have well defined win conditions. The left does kind of the left's wind condition, at least for the last little while has been, or the progressives, if you want to call it that, has been to get, you know, win power, gain power in any way, in any way, shape or form and hold it, hold it indefinitely, forever and ever and ever and ever. For what reasons, we don't know. It doesn't really matter. It's just power is power. And once you have it, you can use it.

And then if you use it, but you know, if the evil soulless people start using that power, well then you get evil soulless results. And that's where we've been kind of circling that drain for quite a while. But the wind conditions on the right are have never really been

well defined. Even the neo reactionary sphere of things, it was reactionary to this sort of chaos, demonic influences of the left and degeneracies and all the rest of it. And the general prognosis was, well, we're going to reverse all that. We're going to get rid of that and we're going to resubstantiate order and that'll be good. And then we can go on with our life.

The major problem of course is if you spend any time in any kind of dissident right or right wing circles of in general, there's, there's no unity, there's no cohesion. This has LED someone like Charles Haywood to do his own spin. It's a, it's a take off the old French term from the revolution, Spadzemi al Ghosh.

We need no enemies to the left. Charles said, well, there should be no enemies to the right, that the right wing needs to coalesce around certain narratives, around certain structures and keep, you know, keep a narrative, let's say unity of some sort. But that would require some sort of ethic or ethos. Ethos. And that's been lacking because we all live and exist in this liberal frame. What the right wing seems to refuse to understand is that they are just as liberal as

left. It's just that they happen to have differences. Opinion on how that power should be used and who should wield it. And you know what should be promoted to children and all the rest of it. There's still some accord core decency, well, let's say the leftovers of Christendom still alive and beating in the right wing. In general, and I would say all throughout the West, almost no one wants to abandon all these

principles entirely. There's a few out there, the destinies and all the rest of it, sure, but for the majority and for the most part, most people will still go don't attack the children, don't abuse animals. As we're seeing with the Hassan Piker doggate the dog collar gate. I'm not going to spend any more time on that. It's, it's too much slop. I really don't care what happens to Hassan Piker.

However, just to keep this in mind and something else I've said before on the show, when we get to, we get to academic agent Nema Parvini, although I prefer to use his Christian name, Norman. So when we get to Norman Parvini, we'll, we'll talk about more about that.

But I said this in a previous episode talking about Norman, that Asman Gold is far more based and far more influential and in, in terms of narrative power, has way more narrative power than Norman could ever hope to have ever in his career. At best academic agent. A, a Norman could maybe be the what is it? Who's the British guy? The, the the next Piers Morgan. And I think that's what he's

angling for. But that's about all he's ever going to be able to do, just be sort of mushy, a mush center, maybe vaguely right personality on air. And God bless him. And if that's his career, good, good for him. He's got to do. He's got to feed his family. So, you know, we're going to do a review and critique of Norman's new veer into attacking right wing ideas. We'll do we'll review his

videos. You know, always in this thing people want to see the savagery and I'm not going to hold back on in the critique. However, I'm just going to be very clear here, just so because you know, I'm trying to be a good Christian here. I'm trying. I'm really trying. I'm failing all the time, but Lord knows I try the the thing I want to. I don't know Norman. I don't know what his situation is at home. I don't know his financials and all the rest of it. It doesn't matter to me.

We're not friends, we're not allies, we're not anything. So I feel it's he's, he puts work out, it's free to criticize. As for him as a human being, I don't know the dude, so I don't care. I don't wish him any. I don't wish him. I'll, let's put it that way. And that's about as as generous as I'm going to be today because I'm feeling like I'm going to get on one and it's been a while. I need to need to stop being so damn nice.

So we're going to we're going to get into that in the second-half of the show. We already got some people sending in money. Harry, my good Harry Ludwig, who's existing on a tight budget, folks. So if Harry can send some cash, you can Sure you sure can. Harry, this is for you. The. Best there is, the best there was, and the best ever will be. Damn straight. And you also get yourself a get yourself a Dick. He's you know what? Harry also gifted a membership. So you know what?

Harry A. Thank. You and you also get yourself a we also got who else sends in some money here. We also got and it's funny enough it's not showing up on the on the the mortgage fund down here. I'm assuming because that was sent before we started playing, but we got can I show this on screen? I don't think so, right, Still lacking that we got Kenneth Wells as well. Super fan of the show, appreciate you can't Kenneth and you get yourself. A thank you, baby.

Damn well. Oh and Harry you sent 2 super chats so you always get this as well. Thank you. Sending your money honeys so I can keep on paying the bills and especially the mortgage. I don't want to be living on the street that would be awkward. Be interesting content though. I think maybe I don't know see if it's live streaming from the beach horrible all right, So what are we going to be talking about today? We're going to let's talk about this political situation.

So it got released this week that and I got to be careful about how I I don't even know if I can share this screen on YouTube because of the language being used Politico tut tut tuts. Apparently, you see, this is also an indication, folks, Politico can say these things, publish these things, blot out only certain words, which I found really interesting. If you look at the thumbnail.

And it's interesting to see the words that they blotted out in their in their thumbnail and the other words that they left in there. So that it's what's often times words or context that if I were to say it, my channel would get naked. However you can. They can say whatever the heck they want, which is a show of power by the way. See, if you're going to win, you're going to win everything. You're going to take it all

because we are in war. We are at war with no matter what political side you're on or you find yourself on, or if you're trying to be a comfortable centrist and ride this one out. I hate to break this to you, but we've been at war for a very long time. We have inherited this war and it will possibly outlive us if unless we actually do something. Want to know why birth rates have been collapsing? Well, birth rates tend to go

down in a war zone. We've been in a war zone for going on at least about 80 years as far as I can figure, probably even longer if you really want to start it. Back before World War One, even the baby boom, as it were, was just kind of replacing the massive population decline of World War One, Great Depression, World War 2. It just kind of brought the numbers back to something that was somewhere on par where it was before World War One. Oops. Entire towns got completely like

vape. You know, their entire male population got vaporized. Some of the we're seeing here in Ukraine right now where they're lowering the consent age for well, they're lowering the age of conscription to put on military age for active combatants. They moved it from 25 to 24 next year or by the end of this year, beginning of next year will be moved down to 23.

Expectations is by by 2027, they'll be down to 20, which means that they'll be, they're basically recruiting 15 and 16 year olds to do advanced training. So right now in Ukraine, if you're below the age, you know, 1515 and above, you're probably being either taken off the streets and put in the military or soon will be They're vaporizing the entire the entire generations. Go watch me and Jim jot just talk about this stuff.

If if you actually want to get an analysis and not sit around for slop, Well, you know, we do, we do try. So we've been in this war in one way shape or form for quite some time. And it's taking the toll, it's taking the toll on birth numbers. It's taking the toll on people's mental health. It's taking the a toll on on finances and just people's general sense of hopeless of hopefulness, which is at all

time lows. The the bitter white pill here for secularists is that you can fix that anytime you want by going to liturgy and talking to your priest and tipping your streamer, by the way. But all these three things combined, this does this magical stuff, the, the cumulative effects of the last, let's say, 120 years have been just sort of like the, the crash course of liberalism in general. This is where liberalism, all the ideologies have kind of come together in this new state of things.

And we're watching that that inertia start to take over. And so the the bottomless pit, nihilism is yawning open and many people are very concerned, but they don't know what to be concerned about. People are angry, but they don't really know where to direct the anger. People maybe people want answers. And quite often all they get are, you know, start a standard wrote. What are we going to call it?

Like it's pablum, it's just we just read off the teleprompter, it's going to repeat the same things. It's fine, it's fine. This is what the markets usually do. It's fine, It's fine. It's just the pendulum swinging. It's. Fine, don't worry about it. Or be very afraid or be very scared. Or, you know, black pill.

It's just all to SAP all your energy and keep all your attention away from things that actually matter, like your family or building 1. Like getting good with God, embrace it. So do I share this on the screen? I don't think I can unfortunately. I'll read a little bit of it. This is political. I love HH leaked messages expose young Republicans racist chat. I'll go basically if you read the political ad, it's, I mean, you know, it's pretty standard

stuff. It's picking and choosing out of all these conversations that were going on for about 7 months. Again, I, I would love to read more of this. However, I think if every single paragraph I would read, unless I do the whole, you know, live censoring of my speech and changing to grape and all the

rest of it, it's it's silly. I wouldn't be able to get through it. So essentially it's this is that the Young Republicans, this group that essentially are, are, are training and financing and getting young people into politics in the political wings, getting them contacts, resources, all the rest of it. Catherine Whiteford famously is also part of the Young Republicans. I think she's one of the good ones, But they had this GC on Telegram. It gets exposed, gets leaked.

We'll get to who likely leaked it to political and political releases this and the response was pretty standard. So this comes out and the young Republican leadership has to come out and say this. This I can share. I'm pretty sure we are appalled by the vile and inexcusable language revealed in the political article published today. Such behavior is disgraceful, unbecoming of any Republican, and stands in direct opposition to the values of our movement. Our movement represents.

Those involved must immediately resign from all positions within their state and local Young Republican organizations. We must hold ourselves the highest standards of integrity, respect and professionalism. And this is from the board of directors of the Young Republicans. Now people read this, many people, Warren McIntyre, many others and took aim against it, saying this, of course, is what

the right does, right? Conservatives, instead of standing with each other and and defending each other, turn around and throw themselves and throw the offending parties under the bus. So, you know, people get offended by something and the first thing the Republicans do is agree with them and get rid of of the offending parties.

JD Vance has come out with his own statement about this, and this is apparently a leaked messaging from the possible future attorney general of Virginia who is basically calling for political violence and the murder of children of one of his opposition of someone in the Republican Party in the in in in Virginia. JD Van says this is far worse than anything said in the college group check and the guy who said it could become the AG of Virginia.

I refuse to join the Pearl clutching when powerful people call for political violence. The leaked screen chat says you simply. You weren't simply asking questions and you know it. I generally was. I wasn't attacking, I was trying to understand your logic. You weren't trying to understand. You were talking about hoping Jennifer Gilbert's children would D and he's and then the AG possible future AG says yes.

I've told you this before. Only when people feel pain personally do they move on policy. So concerning stuff, eventual son demonic activities basically saying he's totally OK with his opponent's children being attacked because he thinks she's a brown shirt and all brown shirts are going to influence their children become brown shirts. So they must be eradicated. The, you know, route to stem. Now wind conditions.

This is where it gets tricky because on one hand we can steal man the young Republican situation and somebody say that. Well, let's put it this way. Let's let's go back and forth here. Yes, the left and many of the Democrats or people in the Democratic parties or people who vote Democrat are supported by the Democrats have crossed too many lines. Now they cross too many lines and they are entering into full on demon possession, right.

We don't need to give them a whole bunch of considerations. I don't think we need to carry water for anybody. I don't think we need to excuse them at all. And we also have to realize that they are now becoming enemy. They become enemy because they view anybody who doesn't agree with him completely as enemy. And as we've seen what they do

to their own ranks. And this is kind of cuts against that whole idea that Padzania Ghosh, it's like, oh, no, no, no, the left will, will, will will have enemies to the left. It's just that once you become an enemy left, you're no longer left. They just poochie out the party. You're no longer concerned. We've seen this happen to many progressive voices, people who were part of the left and said had a problem with something and then they got kicked out of the

party. My goodness, 10 Mirren Shuck now gifts memberships by Harry. Thank you, Harry. Appreciate you. Thank you to all the new members. The so you were at war and that means people have to start acting like it. And I don't think that's really hit people completely yet, both on the distance sphere, although many people have, you know, kind of vocalized this after the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

I think that was a wake up call to many people to understand how things have gotten really hot now and they're going to have to start responding. But people are responding very quick, very slowly, and very predictably because most people being used to being a commentary reactionary, they comment, they they moan, they point things out, they call things out, they call things out on the left. And the rights, aren't they so great? Look, I do this.

Anyone who does any content creation does this is what you do, right? But it doesn't lead to anything, doesn't change anything. It's not acquiring power at all. The young Republicans and people who have been voted onto those boards, the young Republicans are learning how to be get into position of taking power. That's their, that would be what their wind condition would be. You're in this group.

That's that group's going to graduate into, into positions of political power and they're going to go and chase that power to use it, to wield it. If you're doing this when you're in war, then loose lips in GCS can't happen. You can't have traders who will sell out that GC to Politico, and you certainly can't have people inside those GCS acting as if this is a party. It's a good game. It's not a game, or let's just put it this way, it's the game you are playing the capital. THE game.

Capital G, you got to play it to win it when you're reading. I've been reading EM Burlingame's Eternal War, Hope to get EM on the show fairly soon. He makes a distinction between the game and the war, and both things kind of work within each other. But at the same time, you don't get confused of what you're at, where you're at. So saying spicy things to each other and joking about these things and using that language. And that's all just kind of like, that's just dissonant

language. That's just, you know, GC talk from, from, from X groups. I've been, I've been a bunch of them. Yeah, we say some, some words are used in certain GCS I've just seen. I don't know, I've never been part of it, but I've heard tell, let's say of language being used in certain GCS.

That would be It was shocking, But hardly anyone in those GCS is vying or trying to run for political office or presenting themselves as a political wing, as a organization within a political wing that has to, on some level, appeal to the masses to appeal to the center. People who maybe want to like the Republicans, maybe want to like Donald Trump, but will take any excuse to say, Oh no. Oh, gross.

This was the same basic advice I gave to libertarian parties when they were sharing the meme of, of, of the daughter crying at her at her father's funeral, Liz Cheney crying at her dad's funeral. And they're like ha ha ha, because he's, they're evil. I'm like, ha ha, ha, this is gross. This reads bad. So when you're saying spicy, spicy things in GCS, not that, not that they should have been revealed, not that they should have been betrayed by their own, by their own organization, No,

we'll get to that in a second. Because there's, there is a, a bitter white pill here. But if you're at war, you got to start acting like it. Loose lips sink ships. And that's going to be realized from the entire hierarchy, from

the top to the bottom. JD seems to get him because what he's basically saying here is like, yeah, look, there's way worse things being said with way by way more serious people who will wield way more serious political power than the younger Republicans would do at the at this at this time there. That's way more concerning for us at a minute right now. And he's right because JDI think understands they're at war. And every single misstep and every single kind of misfire of

narrative cost you something. You're giving the enemy something that it wants. Now, if I were on the board of directors for the Young Republicans, I wouldn't have fired these guys, right? I would suspend them during pending an investigation, stopping some risks, you know, give me some penalties. Sims, take him aside and go shut the fuck up, OK? We're not children here. I know it's young Republicans. I know you're all kids and some

of that, you know, relative age. But you can't got to stop acting like that. Never give the enemy something easy. At the same time you investigate and you try to find out who leaked this to Politico. Because automatically when I read this, I'm like, OK, so did Politico have a guy inside? Did did someone leak something? What's going on here? How did they get this information? And then we have it from Milo himself. Milo here says I've acquired the sworn affidavit. Affidavit.

Sorry. Affidavit, affidavit, affidavit, Affidavit. Written and signed by Michael Bartels, the victim of Gavin Wax's blackmail op. So the guy who's being named here is Gavin Wax. He's one of the presidents of the let me get this sized up a bit of the young Republicans essentially in here in the in the affidavit. See if we can read this better. Michael Bartels was was asked to hand over all the all the telegram messages so they can be used.

I'll read this briefly. In the affidavit, Michael R Bartels of Washington, District Columbia being duly sworn, disposes a firm upon oath. I was in a group chat using the application Telegram affiliated with Restore YR the Restore YR chat. To my knowledge the Restore YR chat the same group text Politico has attempted to obtain. I was on August 8th 16th, 2025 the Executive Secretary of the New York Young Republicans Club.

I was demanded to provide a full log of Restore Why our chat by Gavin Wax over dispute about related matters on August 16th, 2025. This demand was made via telephone and to my knowledge was not recorded. When I was attempted to resist the demand after providing some of the required information, Wax threatened my professional standing and raised the possibility of potential legal action related to a latest breach of non disclosure

agreement. My position with the New York or the New York Young Republican Club was directly threatened. Actually this this conversation when I did not provide the logs, I was removed from access to most communication channels, leadership chats and my e-mail. Mutual contacts also began to receive alleged call, sorry, alleged details on my personal life from wax etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. So who is this wax character is the question.

And I'm going to actually do something that's a little bit out of character here. I'm actually going to probably agree with Nick Fuentes for a second. I know, strange times, my friends, strange times. Because Gavin Wax is a New York based conservative activist, commentator, columnist and operative. He serves as a 76th president of the New York Young Republican Club, the oldest and largest youth group within the blah, blah, blah, blah blah, right? So he's the president.

You might have asked why Gavin Wax is doing all this stuff. You know, we can get to some speculations, but here's what Nick Fuentes has going to say about it. Because they're going to put this out to Politico and the headline is going to be Generation Z. The young white men are all Nazis. We have a Nazi problem. And what do you think this does for every under 30 white Republican, white man, conservative in politics, huge target on their backs.

This puts pressure on TikTok and X to censor. It puts pressure on Republicans to denounce and close ranks and, and, you know, tighten up and it gives the left ammunition because it justifies, especially after what happened, not just that Charlie Kirk was shot, but that so many of the left wing people were punished for celebrating Charlie Kirk's death. I mean. See, unforced errors always do the most damage.

Always. Because if I'm baiting you in, we're, we're going back and forth and you slip up something or you open, you know, you fall into one of my traps or something like that. You could, you could maybe get yourself out of it right there. You have tricks and you're, you're being aware. You're aware of the conflict. You're aware of your situation when it's unforced. Now everyone has to scramble. They weren't prepared for this

one. They didn't know maybe that they were being investigated or about to be, you know, having all their stuff revealed by Politico. So you're just giving the enemy tons of ammunition. Don't do that, ever. Just shut up. You don't have to post all this stuff online in AGC, especially when you get elected to a position you're part of, a group has a Republican on it, that means they're going to use you. They'll use you if you just voted MAGA.

If you've worn a hat, they'll use you as a stat. They'll make up stuff. You want to force them to make up stuff. The more they have to lie to attack you, the more you can expose the lie, the more they can just point to something like AGC law can go see, look at them saying this stuff. They want to, they want to, you know, gas, gas room that yeah, they want to talk about all this other stuff. Now I get it. The people in the in the GC probably weren't being serious.

They're saying spicy things because it's fun. It's, you know, it's pressed language, so it's fun to say it. Right, I get it. I've done it, you've done it. We've all done it in our own way. But you got to be very careful about what you say right now, where you put it out there, especially if you, you know, you're you're what you're looking to achieve is mainstream

acceptance. Just because Trump got elected and it's been not even a full calendar year doesn't mean you just get to say and do whatever you want. If anything, Trump getting elected and these things starting to move now and across the across the globe, we're seeing populist movements at least gain a lot more traction. That just means it's going to get a lot more dangerous.

You are far safer to say what you wanted to say and whatever spicy terms you wanted to say it maybe not publicly because you said publicly you got you got cancelled, but you could say it privately, you could say it in GCS, you could say it on certain sites. And so that's sure, here's your problem. Now they're going to come after all of it because you are actually now a threat. Before you weren't before you're a punching bag. Now you're going to be a threat. It's also what I'm getting at.

Where's my prediction I made? I actually made it privately last December, and I'd said it publicly in April. That a lot of people you thought were based are going to prove to you that they aren't going to suddenly show themselves to not be all that based. Partly is going to be their own defense, their own OP sack, Right? This. That's reasonable. The other part of it is they never really were based to begin

with. They were doing the fun thing or the interesting thing or they found a vacuum and content and they were using it. And as soon as as, as soon as they understand that now it's gotten serious, they're going to flip a switch and say and do whatever they need to do to either get protected or get accepted. Validation. At the end of the day, it's all about acknowledgement. Acknowledgement and validation. Acknowledge me. Read the room so if this.

Oops, my audio has gone out for some reason. Hang on. There we go. Story is true, then that means Gavin Wax is a traitor. Traitor to his generation, to young white men, to right wingers, to free speech, all of it. And of course, it should not be lost on anybody who Gavin Wax is. And you know, listen, I've talked to Gavin Wax before. I think I have. I'm not a fan of the guy. And, you know, people have said, oh, you know, he likes you, he wants to meet you, this sort of

thing. But at the end of the day, guy's Jewish. And not only that, it's not just that, OK, which is, you know, people might say, well, he's part of the Zionist Organization of America. Isn't he sent up to be in the World Zionist Congress in some kind of position? The guy's deeply embedded in pro Israel politics, and that's no coincidence. Think about the time and place. He's from New York City. Just put this in context too, especially about Zionism on top

of this liberal frame. Zionism is inside that liberal frame. It's just a it's a formalized ideology of liberalism. It still rests on the same tenants of liberalism, nominalism, individualism, nationalism, even materialism, all these things that are that predicate the frame, that basically are the foundations of the frame. Zionism falls into that as well, right? Just different percentages, different levels of spice. That's it.

So, and I've said this too, is that Zionism is now becoming the last holdout ideology of the 20th century. We're evolving. It's evolving into this new thing. I don't think it breaks the frame, but the thing that's going to replace all these ideologies I think is going to be a shibboleth. It's a sort of a combination of all the, of all the ideologies into one, into one pure frame. The true, the, let's say the we're not post liberal and we're certainly not liberalism isn't

dying. It's it's evolving into its final form, which will be a totalitarian, authoritarian form of the frame substantial. You, you before it was sort of like just suggested you could be liberal. Please be liberal. It's nice to be liberal. Everything is liberal, but just ignore all that Now it'll be very, very, very clear to people that no, no, this is liberalism and you either are on board or you're off to gulag.

Bye bye now permanent Siberia. This is a threat of digital IDs and panopticons and all the rest of it, because what's going to be a substantiated in this is pure ideology, totalizing of it, and Zionism is just part of that. It's not distinct, it's not different, It's not set apart. It's simply 11 node inside of the frame. Don Brownie, nice to see you. Help me hit that goal. Folks, over on YouTube, we hit that goal tomorrow. I will do a power washing stream while listening a little bit.

Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones, my goodness, talking about global death cults and all the fun stuff. I'll I'll play that and play some power washing and do some commentary. So let me hit that goal and I will make sure that happens tomorrow, Friday. Jewish President of the New York Young Republicans. He's sent up for a position, I think it's either the ZOA or the WJC. He's a, I'm not making that up.

He's either a delegate for the ZOA or the WJC or the the WZO, World Zionist Organization or Zionist Organization of America. I didn't do my research before the show and this was something else that I saw earlier I either this year or last year. Yeah, the bagel influence is always there, Harry. The thing is, and This is why I keep trying to get through to people, it's not, it's not just the bagels. Even Zionism as a as an ideology is not purely bagel.

It certainly benefits them. It might have been even invented by them to benefit them, sure, no problem. But it's not just them, right? Zionism can apply to anyone at any time. There's Zionist Christians, there are neocons who are Zionist, there's many people who are not bagel and very much a Zionist and doing the work of a Zionist because it's an ideology, This particular one,

it's a very odd one. It's a mutated form of, of, let's say classic liberalism, but it's all, it all goes back to the same roots, all of it. And if you want to defeat it, you don't just defeat the the, the bagels. You don't just toss them out 110 times because they've gotten a little stale. No, no, no. You got to destroy the the fundamentals of the ideologies themselves, the thing that holds the frame together, which are these mental categories, nominalism, materialism,

individualism, even nationalism. We're going to get to that when we talk with Norman or listen to Norman talk about nationalism because he's, because he's spoiler alert, I'm actually probably going to agree with Norman quite a bit on certain things because theoretically, yes, 100% we can all be in agreement. Practically, however, there's a big fall off. And This is why listening to academics is a disease. It only gets you so far.

And usually what it gets you to is just chasing your own tail. It's just they're an offshoot of the Merchants of Despair. The Merchants of Slop are or the Slop Merchants are just a subsidiary of the Merchants of Despair. They do this, they work for the same people. It's the same kind of company, same mall, just slightly different goods. He's with Chuck Schumer, the senator from New York, a Democrat, honoring his grandma, who he says was a Holocaust survivor now.

For context, the grandma was in Italy in the 1940s. That's a Holocaust survivor now, so. Wow, it was during the time of the Holocaust and she survived? What two things? Go figure, Gavin Watch, the provocative, plucky chair of the New York Young Republicans, which is a pretty edgy club. I mean, they host the gala every year and that's all these people fucking talk about.

No offense to them, but all the NYRC, all I'd ever talk about is how, you know, Jeremy Fragrance went to the fucking club one year and it's like no one's ever heard of the end of it. But anyway. Look, the lovers of power are still controlled by connections. It's who you know. You know the right people and you're in the right clubs and you go to the right gals and you shake the right hands and you're introduced the right people and the right people like you.

Guess what? You get invited to go to other places and maybe along the way you get to hold position because if you want to run for office and all that stuff, what do you need? You need connections. You need the right people to go yes, we like you. Let's give them money. Let's give them the the push. You got to get a push from the office always. You know this, this is wrestling stuff, man. It's not just kayfabe. It's you do have to get a push

from the office. So if you're going to go out there and basically say to yourself, I'm not going to do all that stuff, I'm going to I'm going to work from outside the system. Well, the system is now I'm going to see you as enemy. So if you I'll put it this way, I'm totally on board and fine. Anyone who follows this channel knows I keep saying this all the time. It's like, look, politics in the whole political system as we have it right now is Meshugana. It's diseased, it's rotted, it's

cancerous. It's it's not going to work. It's not going to give you what things you want you you want to it for it to produce misfired up says family of seven heading towards baptism in December. New the channel. Best of luck to you. Thank you misfired up. God bless, family of seven, head towards baptism. My goodness, glory to God. But I can say all that we can say that being in the system is no good. The system itself is no good. However, it still exists.

It's the system that you got. So sitting outside, they're going, oh, we're going to go do this other thing. It's like, OK, well, good, good for you, but it's not going to work. You're going to get nothing done zero to be a commentator on on YouTube. Congratulations. And maybe if you're useful enough because you're really working for the system, you just have this appearance, you're outside of it that maybe they'll they'll, they'll bring you back in.

What did Tulsi do right? Tulsa was in the system. She got balanced out. She went and did her YouTube thing and waited around and then they then they called her back in. So it can be done. But whether you're, if you're outside the system, you're just trying to get back in, if you're in the Indies, man, you really want to work for the WWE or AW or one of the bigger companies, you want that. Why? Because that's, that's exposure, that's validation, that's. Acknowledge me. Every single time.

That's the name of the game. And it's not a criticism. That's human. This is human. You need a certain amount of acknowledgement, a certain amount of of prestige, a certain amount of authority or be in a in a system that has authority to borrow from it to get things done. Otherwise you're just some schmuck and a hoodie. Your your, your follower counts and all that stuff. Doesn't matter if you can't get

things done. OK, OK. He just detailed here, Nick just detail the fact that through 11 expose by Politico, all these other dominoes are happening. Young Republicans have to come out and and and get get distance from this X and all these other social platforms are going to now start to censor because it's going to you know, we're going to lose sponsorship and all the rest of it. Why? Because the mushy middle is still going to be reactive to this thing.

Good for you. Anyone in the chat who's been the last five or so years, like many of us trying to figure things out, right? The events of 2020 woke a lot of people up. Even before that, people were going, hey, something's wrong here. And this is fundamentally not OK. And now we're, we're, we're searching for things And you find little groups and you find that and you say little things and you're, and you're trying to work things out.

And maybe, you know, Old Glory Club and many of these other groups have sprung up trying to get things done and good for them. God bless. That's the proper way of using this, of going forward with things. That being said, you still need people in the inside somewhere, local politics, something, because the rest of the world responds to that. The title mayor still means something. Even if you're the mayor of some podunk little town, you have more power than Bob because you're the mayor.

You're mayor, Bob. Not just, you know, schmucky muck Bob. See, the title holds authority. Authority is is necessary for sovereignty of any kind. Any decision making needs to come down to the the metaphysics of sovereignty. We'll get into that later in the second-half of the show because it's really what comes. What's the big question is who is sovereign? Is anybody sovereign? Whatever term you use, is sovereignty still allowed within the liberal frame?

I would argue no, that any time you say the word sovereignty, it's an empty term. It's the word concept fallacy. Sovereign is he who chooses the exception. But who are the exceptions really, if the end result is always the same? And that is what they're all shooting for in one way, shape or form. It just matters how it takes shape.

If you get 15 minute cities in 20 years, whether it's from a Republican plan or a liberal plan or a Russian plan or American or Israeli or whatever, whatever plan produces it, you still get it. That's what you still get. Maybe, maybe it's a it's done in the form that you can find acceptable congratulations, but that's what it is. See. Or digital ID or any of these other things that are big spooky things.

They are concerning because they're being invented, propagated and instigated, instigated and institutionalized, let's say by very bad people, generally speaking. Not your favorite guy. I'm talking about the other guys, sure, but you get what I'm saying, right? Let's do a little bit more Nick, and then we'll get to to Norman. That's like kind of like an inside joke. But so he's at this club.

It's a pretty edgy club. Like Steve Bannon goes to their thing that some of the rhetoric's a little edgy and he's with the Senate Minority Leader, former Senate Majority Leader of the Democrats, another Jew from New York, Chuck Schumer, honoring his grandma who he claims was in the Holocaust. She's. OK, Anyways, yeah, yeah, we get it. Jew. Jew. Jew, Jew. Jew. Jew. Jew, Jew, Right. The the, the the, the issue is this really. Why did this wax guy, Gavin Wax? Why did he leak this to

Politico? Why was the language really all that concerning? Was the positions all that really outside the box? What what's going on? What Gavin is concerned about is appearances, and he wants a certain kind of appearance. He might be a double agent. He might be sent there to basically undermine the entire

organization. It could happen, but most likely it's just that, hey, he wants to be validated and he wants to be invited to galas and he wants a hobnob with very respectable people and very respectable people don't say certain things. You can't be a flat earther and be and be part of the club. Not defending flat earthers. I'm saying that somebody's saying if they find out you're pro flat earther, guess what, Boo bye Boo. Who's that? Can't be, AHH, cost denier or questioner.

Let's say question the certain narratives at all. And guess what? You're no longer invited to the galas. You're not interested. They're not interested in you. Power plays, all the stuff. Yeah, these are all rationalizations after the fact. It all comes down to acknowledge. Me. Every single time. It's how I can make that prediction. Very soon, people that you thought were based are going to turn out not to be. How can I make that prediction so accurately? Because it comes down to

memetics. Figure out a man's desire and suddenly he becomes fairly predictable. Not entirely. Hey, sometimes people can surprise you. Sometimes, you know, someone has a a real core virtue that we just didn't see, and God bless them for that. But. In most cases, that is not the case. In most cases, especially in the media sphere, what people really want is acknowledgement. They want power.

They want to be invited to the nice places and talk to the nice people and got on the big shows and you know, don't get a big don't get brought into Piers Morgan as the as a punching dummy, you know, as the as the effigy of of all that is wrong. And Piers will do that. But no, you want they want to get on the bigger shows and be treated like an equal, respected equal because you know, you're very respectable, right? You have you have a degree. Taught at Oxford.

Or wherever the heck he did. Then you get booted out for some reason and he went back in, but you went back in on your terms. You want to be right, I'm right, you're wrong. It's a very powerful motivation. So brings it to a now this got brought to me in AGC that Norman here, it's his Christian name has started producing a whole series of what is he calling this now? Norman Parvini versus right wing ideas is #3 nationalism. It's on a few of these.

If you guys like this, when we're done, let me know and I'll do more because this is, I think is a classic example of yet again, you can be right in theory, but wrong in practice. And especially when we get into certain word concept fallacies, you're going to see that it, it doesn't reach people. It doesn't matter if what you're saying is phonetically correct and you pick up the dictionary and you see point to the word CC. No one uses it that way.

No one thinks of it that way and no one's working in that reality. If you want people to work in that reality, then then the job is to get them to work in that reality. That's a whole different kind of set of objectives. So let's get into this, and especially about his concept around nationalism. Welcome to another edition of Neema Parvini versus Right Wing ideas. I am Neema Parvini and today I'm going to be talking about let's. See if this.

Nationalism and why I've never, in all these years, ever once referred to myself as a nationalist. I have here a book by John Mearsheimer called The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Now again, I'm I'm going to be trying to be as fair as possible. I I also I've never considered myself a nationalist. However, I don't confuse my personal ideas, beliefs, frame front of my all the rest of it with that which should be

adopted by others. I I don't confuse these two things because I understand that I can set myself apart. That's a personal decision and one because of my living situation and who I am and how I am and all the rest of it makes an easy one for me. I've always been sort of a mental expat. So living as an expat here in Australia, it makes it even easier. I, I care, I have to care even less, which is wonderful.

But but I make also no mistake that just 'cause that's my frame, my way of looking at the world and living, that it should be everyone else's. That'd be silly. You don't be like me, bad back, constantly irritated. It's, it's not. It's not fun. Note that he doesn't call it tragedy of power politics between nations. That is because all of. Yeah, He also, he doesn't call it a whole bunch of other things

too. He didn't know if the volume's OK on this because it's coming through a little low on my end and I can probably boost it. Hang on a second here, let's boost the volume of it. The powers he considers in this book were or are empires. All of these books I have behind me are the histories of empires. This is this is such a sneaky tactic. It's sneaky, right? It's it's the you're it's a wiggle out, right. I don't call myself a nationalist. I call myself an empiricist. Oh, good for you.

Does it? Do you live in an empire currently? They're they're Norman. Do you really? Is the British Empire still a thing? I say it is, but you know, you're free to disagree. But so he's basically, he's going to say the the American empire exists and the Russian Empire exists and the Chinese empire exists today. It's a heck of a statement. None of these countries would ever admit to or have ever claimed that they are an empire. They do claim that there are nations or republics or

something like that. If you're going to claim that a that an empire is simply a a large, let's say a large region with with many different sub regions included in it that are all subservient to the main region. So let's say in Russia, Well you have Chechnyans and many other groups who are formed part of the Russian Republic. Fair enough, but then that could apply to many places. Canada would be then an empire if that's your definition of

empire. Large landmass made different groups and language and ethnic groups, the French and Acadians and many others natives etcetera, all held together under 1 dominion, right? It's called the Dominion of Canada. So is that the Empire of Canada? Not so much right. Australia up to the 1960s had dominion over over many of the islands here in this in the in the Pacific that there was a was do we talk about Australia being an empire? No. Interesting. So right away we're into a word

concept fallacy. Now I understand when he says empire, I understand exactly what he means. Yeah. Empiricis the Imperium. Yeah, I understand. I understand that Russia used to be. And I believe is on would like to be again an empire. I think that China more or less thinks as an empire, if we want to use it, that that term, The other term we could just use, which is a lot, lot easier is civilization. Do you have a civilization or

don't you? Now, I've said publicly that you no longer live in a civilization that none of us in the West do They're, you know, the, the, the global American empire or whatever you want to call it is no longer a civilization. It's a group, it's a function. It's a system. It's a this it's a that's a whatever. Sure, but it's not a civilization. It doesn't do what civilizations need to do Don Browning $10. Thank you so much. World War 2 advertisement. Keep mum. Either keep your mouth shut.

Yeah. And look if at the end of the day, if Norman's doing all this because he lives in Britain and Britain is getting crazy out there, right? It's getting kind of crazy in the UK and he's just getting ahead of it saying, hey, whoa. Whoa, whoa, whoa. Before you start describing all these ideas to me, let me just make very clear how I feel about this, that and the other thing. I don't blame him for it OK? I do not blame him if this is his defense off SEC OK. I do not blame him for it.

I don't blame him if he wants to be the nearest new Piers Morgan. I don't blame him or have any ill words for him if this is his. He thinks that this new track will get him into the right conversations and and be able to feed his family so that don't blame him. Have nothing against him for that. However, just keep in mind that many of these same people are not going to give up their right wing credit cards, their social credit cards in the right wing. They're not going to sacrifice

that. They might get revoked by certain people, but they're going to be held up by by the by the establishment as the new right, right. Do these people reflect your values? Do these people reflect your your ways of thinking? Probably not. And even if you live in Britain, maybe maybe you live in Britain, but certainly not if you live in America. And fundamentally it's because these these folks. And remember, I'm not saying anything disparaging about about Norman, the human being, just

Norman the character here. The one thing I will say disparaging about it is there are no ethics, there is no ethos here. It's self-serving. It is here to do 1 purpose and one purpose only, which is to get Norman. Acknowledge me. Acknowledgement, validation position, That's what it's for. So watch if you want, but keep keep this in mind. Because the history of the world is the history of empires. Before I get going here, pick up a course at the academic agency.

Promo code Shredder gets you 25% off. You know what you could easily say they're the history of the world is the history of religions. You know, Yes, empires are one thing. Civilizations can exist with or without an empire. Some of the greatest, some of the greatest civilizations on the earth that that moved entire continents and moved entire swaths of history were not empires. Venice was not an empire. City of London.

The look, when we start getting into into shipping lanes, we start talking about the Dutch East East India Company or the British East India Company. Were they an empire? No. Now you might attach them to an empire, but the the Netherlands were never an empire. Never vaguely. If you go back and vaguely attach them to the Holy Roman Empires, and we're not sure which were neither, which was neither holy nor Roman. Discuss. Oh, a feeling of a clump.

You can, you can attach it to whatever you want, man. The history of mankind is based on, you know, technology works. Goodbye's course, though, of course. I'm sure it's great. I'm sure it's fantastic. For all courses I'll play the AD and when I come back I'm going to talk about nationhood and Empire promo code. Right away, we're seeing shorts. We all know what that means. Oh shredder world class education good night to you by school. Good night to you by woke

university. Well, no more pick up your course today. I. Don't even know what he's using. It's like the world's tiniest, crappiest wood chipper, which he's, which he's definitely afraid of. It's got every single guard in the world, right. Look at the safety guards. He's wearing his what? And what is this too? He's wearing shorts. So it's warm enough to wear shorts, apparently, but cold enough to wear a puffy jacket and gloves and just be kind of like twigs.

Oh, the marsh might get up in my face. Are you wearing a screen guard too? Come on now. 25% off all courses with promo code shredder. That history of the world is the history of empires. Again, we can say the history of the world is the history of affinity anymore. And as such. History of the world is a history of books. Literacy. History of the world is a history of hats. I'm in the abstract, I believe is utopian and unrealistic and I've developed this view over

many years. I've listened to a great many self avowed nationalists, white nationalists and so on, and it strikes me that their view is unrealistic. For example, what does it mean to be a bell? I would go on the limb here, tree surgeon and say that all courses, online courses are essentially useless now with AI, with AI and Grok and all the rest of it, you can literally go into chat with GBT for free and say give me a course, design a course for me and it will just spit one out for you.

If it doesn't do it like verbatim like in a in a 12 port 12 part course, which I'm sure you could get it to do as well. You could have it just have video links and you sit there and watch the videos. All of this stuff is the whole academic revolution, let's say is done, it's finished bye. Not saying the the information isn't, but the fact is we're we have the problem of having too much data. We have way too much data, especially when he gets into

gets into commentary. It's basically the bond market, right? You have the derivatives market, so you have bonds that are bought and sold and that's easy to understand, right? OK, fine, commodities, assets, etcetera. Sure, fine. Then you get into derivatives and what they can basically do with the bonds themselves and how many times they can sell it and all the rest of it. And all of a sudden you're like, Oh my goodness, This is why it's so screwed.

When you add commentary on to information, any data, every single piece of data now has new commentary. So the political piece, right political rights writes an article and it spawns how many responses to that to to that article? Thousands now with AI could reach into the millions easily in different languages. Everyone respond to you. Everyone can give their hot take. I just did it.

New branch of information, and from that information, anyone can branch off that and branch off that and branch off that. So from one node, from one little piece of data, you can have almost infinite amount of responses to that to that data to the point where once you add in differentiation and all these other little human things, all of a sudden, by the end of it, you're no longer talking about political, you're talking about something else entirely. But it's still the root is still

there. So when you get into these courses and sort of academic analysis, one too much ink has been spilled almost every single basic topic. All you can do is revitalize a topic, bring it back into conversation. You know, a a was big was big into Carlisle and Yar of it and all the rest of it and use that to gain ground when a lot of people are looking for answers and looking for answers outside of the mainstream, me being one of them. Certainly I still am.

The thing is that my all my all my searches led me to orthodoxy and once I get it gets to once I got to Orthodoxy, I'm like, I don't have to keep looking. I can keep examining and utilizing and and using my developing front of A to examine the world and produce content and discussions for you fine folks, but I don't have to keep looking for where are the answers? It's right there, all of it. In fact, every single time I pick up a new thing and reading it and go, Oh, this is interesting.

And then I kind of cross reference it back to the church fathers. I find out that there's almost almost for certain there is a church father from 1000 years ago or whatever who said this exact thing, who discussed this concept or who, you know, utilize Christian, the Christian frame to predict these kind of these kind of outcomes. To AT kind. Of makes everything else redundant, doesn't it? So. Norman here is going to try to make a distinction between

empire and nationalism. Then the idea of nationalism. Now I happen to agree here that nationalism is born out of that post enlightenment exists in that liberal frame. Don't talk about empires anymore. Empires require monarchs also require religions also create also require distinct and permanent regions and peoples. They're defined. The in Group is always the in Group. Rome had a very clear idea of

who Romans were. When they stopped having a clear idea of who Romans were, Rome fell apart. It wasn't discussion about who, you know, the high times of Rome. Romans were Romans and they weren't, you know, the they weren't Gauls, for example, or Persians. Keep it in mind. You also need a religion. You need it. Religion, in whatever form it is, is a repository of tradition. It is how we keep and record tradition and make tradition live in the present and carried

out the future. Tradition is inherent. Is is important because it binds people together. It gives them a sense of being, of meaning. Without it, people have no sense of meaning. They have no connection to the past. The present is just what you're doing. And the future becomes very attractive and novel. But it's just a wizzle wazzle, you know, out there in the wilderness. It's a seat of anxiety,

depression, nihilism. You get rid of religion, guaranteed you no longer have a civilization, period. I've said there's three things, three things. A Reggio, right? The Reggio that binds civilization together, that gives it purpose, is a ruler or governing system. Let's say a religion and a region, which includes both a border, land and a people, culture, language, that which you know, so we can say it is

this and not that. The French civilization is different from the Belgian civilization. They can share certain things, they can share language, they can share religion, they can even share a general region if you want to talk about Europe, but they have to become distinct. Why? Because without that distinctness, without that differentiation inherent in the system, in the civilization itself, you lose all-purpose, you lose all meaning.

Someone's saying here a a maybe just go on this route to protect his family. Yeah, I've covered that before. Yeah. And you know, honestly, if that's the reason, then I, I, I'll, I'll, I've said it before, I'll say it again really briefly. I, I don't, this is not a criticism of Norman, the human being. I'm only criticizing what he's putting out there as content. I don't know the man.

I don't know why his ex, you know, I don't, I have no insight on on his life or his thinking or anything else. Anything else like that behind the scenes I only get can address what he's putting out there. So this is what I'm doing. You got a inside track on him, Share or not, I don't know whatever.

Elgin Nationalist. And the reason why I'm interested in this, sorry, really briefly, the reason why I'm interested in his public position positioning is that it's 1 proof of my my prediction be true. So me I'm right, I'm right, you're wrong. The the other thing is that it does change things, right? He's got over 100,000 subscribers.

He's very well respected in certain circles in the dissident right and all these other circles or was he's considered a gatekeeper, he's considered somebody. So what he's changing messaging, he's going to change the messaging of a percentage of people and all the percentage of people are in your GCS are you know, are vying for political position and all the rest of it. So. What does it mean to be a nationalist for any small

nation? I would argue that today you can only really be a nationalist for the American empire, which basically means being a neo con. You can be a nationalist for the Russian Empire, which means, you know, supporting Putin. You can be a nationalist for the Chinese empire, which means getting behind the Communist Party of China. But all the other states really do not have a realistic right to

nationalism. Any quote UN quote nationalism is afforded by another great power such as, I would argue, Ukrainian nationalism. This is. And that's nonsense. The Ukrainian nationalism, well, Ukrainians got decreed, decried their their independence of the Soviet Union. When the Soviet Union fell, they did in 1991. Now speculation, big time speculation is that the British got in there and supported

Ukraine nationalists. But to be clear, Ukraine nationalists and the Ukraine nationalisms for the Bandera kind of that kind of ideas that was still always a small subset within the greater Ukrainian political body. I, I was a Ukrainian nationalist for a long time. You know, I, I rubbed noses or rubbed shoulders with serious people who, you know, wanted Ukraine independence and sovereignty above all else. I was in those discussions.

So, yeah. And I, you know, I had discussions with people that I, that just kind of put me off early on in my life about anarchy or anarchists because you start talking to people and you're like, wow, OK, you guys are a bit crazy. And that's really what was the foundation the, the raison d'ete, the ideology of Ukrainian nationalists going back into the mid into the mid and mid and late 90s, probably early 2000s, probably even today it's morphed. But it originally it was about,

about ultra anarchism. They're anarchists, you know, Black Flag wearing anarchists, basically that group that's now split into as of and, and Antifa. You follow those tracks back, you get right back to anarchists of the 1990s. All of them. They all share that same ideologies. See. So the problem with the with nationalism is in its current frame and how he's using it, is that nationalism is an ideology onto itself. It's basically a storefront for a operating ideology behind it.

Now, the operating ideology might differ. Each nation might have a differing set of idealistic ideals, Classic liberalism, anarchists, communist, fascist, da da da da da da, right? Socialist, sure, but that's what it is, right? The Belgian, the Belgian nation. So if you're a Belgian nationalist, what you're really doing is you're projecting your own preferred form of ideology onto the state. And you're saying the, in many cases, what you're saying is the current state ideology is not

serving the people. And you make that, you make the distinction because it's because it's a nice little selling technique. The current system is diseased. We're going to replace it with a new system, which is just my system. You know, my group, we don't like the socialists. We're going to place them with them, with the fascists. We don't like the fascists. We're going to place them with the socialists we don't like.

We're just going to brand them. And in many cases, yeah, fundamentally the current system might have a set of ideologies or might be able to be reduced to an ideology. But quite often when we're seeing this in in Europe and why it's being attacked by the extremes by people who have an an actual definable ideology, is that Europe got into too much mush where you couldn't define what, what is the European ideology, vague socialism, something. And why? Because of this sort of

mushness. And now that it's being attacked by discernible ideologies and now gives the the Europeans the excuse to move into authoritarianism, which is the final form. And authoritarianism is not coded into one set of ideologies, right? It's not just the liberal, it's not just the right or the left. Anyone can be authoritarianism. Anyone at any time, you just decide to go. You know what, we're going to squash everybody, and that's what's happening.

Clearly funded and fostered by. By my course, I should have a course. No, just by my course. That's it. Whatever. NATO against Russia or Israeli nationalism, which is almost entirely propped up by American power or. Well, and British power who, who invented the state of Israel in the 1st place there Norman, you'll notice. And this is this is constant, right?

If we take two polarizing people personalities, you take someone like Tom Luongo and then you take Norman over here and you compare and contrast, Tom will go goes full in on it's all City of London. It's all the British, right? You can trace back all these problems, both past, present and future to the British. And you know what? Honestly, I have a hard time disagreeing. I don't agree with every single thing Tom ever says. I think sometimes he goes to a bit too hard to paint on certain

things. You know, I don't have examples, but whatever. But they're minor, they're mild, they're novel. You know, it's I like Tom. I think Tom's, I think Tom's on the mark on 99% of things. And anywhere we disagree, it's like sort of novel shit. So someone asked, is is Myron Shuck the guy with the Montreal cap? Yeah, it's STEM. What? Who is this Myron Shuck guy? It's me. Mirror if someone's pronounced, if someone's spelling it that way, Bob, it's someone spelling

my name phonetically. Miron this is spelled MIRON is pronounced mirror like the like one of the things that gave Jesus mirror frankence gold frankenceis and mirror right. So mirror Miron shook Miron shook. Say it along with me. And if you bought, you'll buy a membership. You can become a mirror and shook mirror and shook mirror. How are you going to say this? A mirror and Chad A mirror and shook mirror and wait. Mirren shook Mirren. Chad or a Mirren chuckle, right?

Or Polish nationalism, which again is propped up by American power, is kind of allowed as a frontier. Mr. Fired Up says was the Byzantium Empire authoritarianism? Not at first, but certain by the end. It's almost it's always authoritarian before it's end. Let's put it this way, legalism. You need laws. Laws are fine, right? Laws are are a way to, to discern when punishments and judgement have to be metered out. But when it's, when a society becomes a Society of laws, it's

lost its meaning. Because generally speaking, that means that the, the people on the ground, the average citizen of a, of a, of, of an empire, civilization or whatever, that has to be held in by the law and not by their own, by their own sense of moral right and wrong, which should line up to pretty much everyone else's chuckle bucks. Yes, Oops. It's nice to see you back.

If you find yourself constantly in moral contradiction or conflict with with the civilization you're in, there's a problem, and it's either the civilization's problem or yours. How do you make that discernment? You go to liturgy, talk to a priest. You have to draw on something bigger than you, something that's been around much, much longer than you. And this is where tradition comes in. And this is also why tradition tends to be the first thing they

attack. If I want to destroy your ability to tell right and wrong, to be able to have just a discernment between what is what we're, what's happening here is, is moral or immoral. The first thing I'm going to do is destroy your, your, your continuity and call back and only call it back a la carte. This is what the academic does. The academic will reach into history and go, I like this, like that. Oh, look at Carlyle.

Let's let's highlight this. What they failed to understand is that Carlyle, especially look at his work in heroism. Carlyle is calling back to tradition. He's trying to be a node within the stream of tradition. He's not trying to be a part of it, be separate from it. He's trying to connect people to it, and that's vital. It's important, Mr. Fire Up says. That makes no sense. What makes no sense?

Let me know. Country against the encroachment of Russia or Taiwanese nationalism as a kind of bulwark against China. All of these are afforded by the US. During the Cold War, the USA and indeed the USSR funded many different nationalist uprisings against the old European imperialist powers. The old European empires were on the back foot, they were on the decline, and the newly emerging empires, Russia and America, were funding nationalist movements against the old

empires. That's not entirely accurate either. In fact, America especially went to war on behalf of the old European empires. Korea and Vietnam stand out distinctly. Why did America go to go to war in Vietnam? Well, because the Vietnamese had kicked out the French. So the Americans went in there to basically reclaim territory that the French had. Now, you might say that they came in there to fill a vacuum. OK, fair, whatever.

Sure, they were going to take it for themselves and exclude the French. Yeah, maybe. But either way, they went in there because the French had failed. They went in there to replace the French one way or the other. Same thing in Israel would have said that. The seven country war, all that stuff. Yeah, America got involved because suddenly the the European outpost in the Middle East was in trouble. Same thing in Korea. Britain wants to go into Korea. Why?

Well, they want to make an inroad. It was Britain and America went to war in Korea, along with Australia and many, many of the British Commonwealth. People forget that wasn't an American war. In fact, people never talk about Korea. I'm going to, I'm going to do a deep dive, I think starting next year into Korea. It's been standing out as this weird little place, this weird little dark place in the world where it's like what happened during the Korean War.

Why don't people talk about it more? There's no propaganda films about it. Very few Manchurian Candidate and a few other little things came out of came out of Korea. But that was this sort of like leftover after the World War Two. It was a major war that claimed a lot of lives and no one really talks about it. Interesting. So yeah, no, he's all the books. I'm no academic. I have no big, you know, whatever. But he's just using rhetoric here.

I think the US backed over 20 such movements according. And his rhetoric exposes bland spots. It's never, it's never Europe. Europe's on the back. On the back end. Europe failed in World War 2. America became ascendant. So all the problems in the world post World War 2 I guess are America's problems or it's it's America's fault. No one else. No one else had sovereignty. Only America.

Only America. Russia and China apparently have sovereignty because that's essentially what empire means. Empire or or nationalism or nation or civilization, pick your word, it essentially they all mean the same thing in this context, all rely on one thing, sovereignty. Who is sovereign? Because who is sovereign gets to make decisions, gets to act independently of anybody else,

essentially. They may have considerations, but ultimately if, if, if I am sovereign, I get to choose the exceptions, I get to do what I want to do. Now a global system gets rid of all sovereignty completely. No one can do really do what they want to do because it all has to be run by committee. But that just makes the global system, this one world government or whatever you want to call it, into the sovereign unit. So they're acting independently of other people's interests.

They're only acting within their own interests. They can code that as everybody's interests as much as they want, but essentially it becomes their interest. It's a separate group. So whatever term you use, empire, nation, civilization is a term for sovereignty because it relies on it. You can't have any of these things without some sort of sovereignty, personal or

otherwise, external or internal. Now the the only thing that that I would say is different between let's say an empire and a nation is its direction. Nations are in are directed internally and empires are directed externally. Empires externalize their power as as far as they can, as as far as they can make it. They expand their sphere of influence to as many areas as possible. A nation withholds that, that, that sovereignty onto itself.

So it's not looking to expand its sovereignty into other, into other territories. It controls it for itself. And when a nation begins to expand that sovereignty over other areas or attempts to, that's its attempt to become an empire. That's the distinction, right? It's directional, not not systematic, because ultimately the difference between an empire and a nation is really just scale. And we can just we can, we can disperse both those terms and just call it a civilization.

Western civilization is a civilization that spans an immense amount of the world, all of Europe, Americas, most Pacifica, right? In fact, in any place that adopts it doesn't even have to be Western. Russia is much more of a Western civilization than it is an Eastern civilization. To this chap Ryan Griffiths over 20 nationalist movements during the Cold War, funded by America against the against the imperial powers in America.

Obviously in in the Soviet case, obviously it came with, you know, a kind of communist flavour. Although the communists also use nationalism for their cause, as Stalin did, as Maude, as sorry Ho Chi Minh did in the Vietnam War against the Americans, which which again really was a battle against the old European powers, in that case the French Empire. So, yeah, so you can see that nationalism has a bottom up the. French hadn't didn't have an empire.

Excuse me? The French didn't really have an empire under classic. I mean they had under colonialization. Again, if you're simply saying that an empire is expansive. So an empire has territories that are outside of its out of the home district, right? The the seat of Rome is in Rome, but Rome is obviously in many

other places, right? It's under the authority of Rome. So you'd say that if, if you have a, a nation state, let's say, or a state that has territories all over the place that are subservient to that state, therefore it's an empire. If that's, if that's what he's going with, then we can say, yes, the French had an empire, the Belgians had an empire, the British and all these other people's people had empires technically.

But that's really not what we would say when we talk about Byzantium or Rome, or we talk about even the British or American empires. If there are such things or were such things. It's not just how much territory controls, it's how much power it exerts on the world itself. The British had an empire because the majority of the world right now thinks and speaks in English. English is the most common language still to this day.

I you, you maybe you can run the numbers and say actually because of Africa and South America and stuff like that, it's actually Spanish by X percentage. Or it's, you know, actually it's Mandarin because. Because the population. Yeah, yeah, yeah. OK, cool. No one speaks Mandarin outside of China, really. That's the thing. There's more English, there's more Chinese people who learn English than there are English people who learn Mandarin. That's the difference.

If you see people complaining about the American empire, some of that on X from other places, from other nationalities, and they're doing it in English and it's not just a translation thing and they're actually writing it and speaking in English, that means they have English in their head. That means they've been colonized completely. That's power. That's empire. When Latin was the default language of the world or Greek was default language of the world, That's empire.

See sound different? Also, if French was spoken wildly by the majority of people in the world, you could say, well, the French had an empire. How many people speak French? Really? More than not, right? More than more than no one. Vietnamese people speak French. A lot of Africans speak French, Sure. Spanish, same thing. So these were empires at some point. I don't think the Vietnamese were shirking off the French Empire though.

They were shirking off colonialism, which is essentially the the end of empire, the liberalisation of the concept of empire. Sentiment, it's not it's, I wouldn't say it's a delusion. I would say people do feel nationalistic. They do feel pride in their country, but often that is indulged or that is played on by elites for a specific purpose and a wider geostrategic purpose. Divisions are always useful. The British been the British model for a very long time.

Divide and control within the division. It's why I think that Charlie Kirk was assassinated. The the people who did the the Ppus was City of London and used as off. I've detailed this in past shows. Go check those out. Buy membership. They're they're in the membership portal. 2 bucks. It's easy. The I won't even get. I won't really waste too much time to talk about that. But the, the, the reason is that when you see division and and control through division, that's

a British tactic. Not saying other people couldn't do it, but that's that's a classic hallmark of the British. So when you see those things that erupt Middle East and many other places, even there in America, right, left versus right, all this kind of discord, that's a British tactic. That's an Anglo tactic. Just is OK. The cauldron is a Russian tactic. That's our tactic. Tactic. 2 beers and getting, getting saucy. We could ascribe certain things

to certain nations. And so, yeah, sure, but that's also a British thing, Malacca says. I, I would say the British learned it from the Spanish. Sure, OK, but but for the last 400 years that's been a British tactic and they've excelled at it. They've learned it from the Spanish. They took it to new to new aims, to new heights. And essentially here a, a is not saying anything here, like there's nothing here that's actionable. What are you going to do about an empire?

Because if the question is really sovereignty, personal or national or group preference, when you say white nationalist, really what they're saying is they want sovereignty for this group, Black nationalist, Islam, nationalist, whatever, right? They want sovereignty. They want the right to determine and make choices for this group. That's what that comes down to. When every time you hear nationalism, just think sovereignty, either you have it or you don't.

If you don't, you want it. It's like leverage. So you gain leverage in order to obtain sovereignty. That's the wind condition or has to be the wind condition to tie it back to what we started off with the show about. I don't know, if I was part of the Young Republican Leadership Committee, I would basically be saying, look, we're, we're, we want sovereignty. We don't have it. We don't have the ability to do what the left is going to do with this political piece. Back to the left.

Hassan Piker is going to be brought down by shocking his dog, not by his political positions. OK? He's already losing real support because of a dog mistreatment of an animal, not his political positions, which is a bitter white pill. Again, that shows there's some decency still beating the heart of the West sometimes. We're just going to make a hard stand and go Nope, no children, no animals, man, thank God. But. For a dog, how delicious.

Will that be and also tell all these people it's like, look man, you ain't got nothing. All your courses and all your fine thinking and your theology and your your sorry, your your theory sorry and and all your high minded positioning don't mean nothing. Because what really brings a guy down is mistreatment of an animal.

And who's been front and center on this is asthma and gold, Patriot gold as as as Matthew Erickson's has talked about who's way more powerful than Norman will ever be ever. And here's the reason why. Asthma Gold. Has has built and. Developed. A. Multi million. Subscriber and viewer viewership by being authentic. I've watched asthma and Gold's. Let's say worldview change. As the world's changed, as it changed for me and many others, but it was authentic. He went through different

periods. It wasn't just to get views. In fact, he he risked a whole bunch of things. He put it on the line. That's why he's more effective. People. Respond to authenticity and I know I've seen this in the chat. And I'm sure, I guarantee you we're we're going to. Hear about the defense of a A is that he's playing a character. He's playing the heel. He's doing a heel run. He's going to come back as a babyface, right? This this is all part. Of his plan, this is all part of his game.

If that's true, it's still damning because it means he's playing a game. We're no longer. In a game this. Is a war it's. Not time for bobbleheads in the. Back and all that stuff. It's that time's done. It's over, it's finished. Charlie Kirk's The Charlie Kirk Incident should really ratify that in your brain, it is later than you think. Hasten therefore. To do the work. Of God, get it right now at a minute. OK, your nationalism is probably the pawn of some other power.

Trying to do something most of the time, even in the case of, you know, like Iran, for example, Iran has tried to kind of go it alone against the Great Satan and against the little Satan. Israel OK, but in the process it has found itself folded into Russian power and Chinese power, so it still ends up being an imperial pawn in a greater chess game. This sovereignty again, this as I as Iran sovereign. Was it ever? Sovereign. Could it ever be sovereign?

It is if you're going to say that Israel only exists on behalf. Of the. Global American. Empire then I ran in his current configuration post King of the Shah, which was a British plant by the way Again, nice little dodge from British Empire but sure, whatever. Well, you kick out the British, the British influence, you're going to get more influence because you have a slight little window in time to create and maintain sovereignty. And if you can't maintain that

because. Of your connections and affiliations. Then the other sovereign nations will take over for you. I don't have a grudge. Against a A a Julio. If you watch the entire the. Entirety of my show. Then you'll see that I don't have a grudge. People put this in front of me and asked me to comment, so I'm commenting. I have no grudges. I don't care. The way you. I don't care the way people think people should care. I I don't what I care.

About is you going to church and talking to a priest. And getting good with God, that's what I care about. What I'm trying to do is break your frame constantly. You want to maintain it. And hold on to it, that's fine. Find comfort in it if you can. It's nihilistic, it's the end of things. It's too it's too late in the game or in the war. And then the in the world itself. To hold on to false beliefs, it's way too late for that. Really. The history of nationalism. Proper.

When properly considered. Soviet, Soviet and US covert regime changes. Do you ring the period of glory to God in all things? Decolonization. Post post colonial. Period of the Cold War, they funded 64 covert regime changes, Charlemagne says. Well said. We must speak plainly and mean what we say. Now is not the time for games. Games. Over game is over if. Game was over and. Game was over a long. Time before a long time. Ago game was over in 2016.

Game was certainly over when Charlie Kirk got shot. Get serious guys, if you want to play this, if you want to be in this, if you want to be in these spheres and think these thoughts. It's the choice. Is yours. You can go watch Marvel movies. Man or whatever is on Netflix. Or something. You can just go do that, Play some games. Hey, we're going to play some power washing tomorrow. Whatever, fine, do your thing. This doesn't have to be for you. Buckle in. Do your thing man.

Goom, I don't care. So again, this whole like I got a grudge I. Don't have a grudge. I literally people put this in front of me. And saying, look, a, A is doing the thing you said you said people are going to start doing. So I'm going to talk about it because people then hold on to things and project. These people. And these ideas and it's like. Look man, you got to know what time. It is. This this is not the. Time to talk about Empire. Or. Wonderful things we're going to do in 100.

Years. Now you got to get your shit figured out. Right now, because they're going to come for you. They're coming for all of us. If you hold any idea? Outside of a very narrow band of allowable. Opinions. They're going to get rid of you. One way you should perform the digital gulag will exist. Now is your time to do something about it and either that thing is going. To church, going to liturgy? Talk to a priest.

Learning discernment, getting that tradition, getting your getting your head out of your spiritual ass and starting to see things straight, then that is the mission that becomes a calling of your life and hopefully you pass it on to your kids. Go have. Kids get married. Have kids, sacrifice, suffer. And do with a smile on your face. That's the calling. That's your life. That's. What this is right now? Get it? Straight Octavian 9 and a nine.

Thank you so much. We are living the symptoms of the game. Being over, yeah, well, again, there is a game and the game, I'll get an EM on. We'll talk about it between them. In a in a very short. Space of time. Many of them were overtly nationalist movements and you know. The the Ukraine example. Is, you know, they've given billions upon billions, $175 billion since 2022 given to Ukraine. Russians have given lots of money to some of their proxy

forces around the world as well. So, yeah, I mean, in in such a case, in such a situation, that's the actual reality of things. What is your nationalism? Your nationalism is a plot. You're, you're, you're basically being played by somebody else. This is, This is why I during the whole Russia Ukraine thing, which is still ongoing, I was always reluctant to kind of come down on the Ukrainian cause because it's obvious it's being propped up.

It's obvious that it's, you know, a stratagem by empire. OK, now you could say, well, well, I wish Empire again. We'll just ignore the whole. British thing completely because it's it's easier. It's down to sovereignty. Do do Ukrainians have the right to be sovereign? Do the do the? Do the Does Israel have the right to exist? Is code for. Does Israel have the right to be sovereign? Julio 499 Just a little support for our guy. Thank you so much. I want to break your frame.

I can present you with the ammunition I. Can present you, I can light the fire, but you got to break it yourself. You got to challenge it and everywhere it leads. And sometimes that means. That your sacred cows. And guys you like. You got to go. Hey, I liked you for for a while. Thank you for. Your ideas. Thank you for for getting me to. To this place, appreciate it. Bye now 'cause you're all they're doing substantiating a frame. They're in the frame. They can't think outside of it.

The only thing that allows you to break a. Frame. Really. Break the frame completely is God, is religion is a tradition and a people. It's peak known as it once said. Collectivize or die you'll. Hear that and go, oh, communism. No, no, no. You got to get. You got to get. Yourself a community you got to surround yourself with. People, you will. Fast with, never feast with those you will not fast with, or will not. Fast with you. Surround yourself with people who will be with you in.

The hard, bad. Times and then ask yourself often will some. People like Norman over here. Is Norman going to fast with you? Is he, you really think, Norman? 'S going to fast with you. If you're. An American, especially. Do you think Norman's going to fast with you? No, Norman's going to do what's good for Norman. And I'm not. I'm not. Judging him on that, I'm really not. You know, people hear that and go, oh, you're obsessed or something else. I'm just calling it out.

You got to be clear about these things. Because if you're surrounding yourself with people who will not. Fast with you. Then their support means nothing. Their likes mean nothing. Their viewership and all the rest of their ideas mean nothing. It's all self-serving at the end of the day. It all substantiates the frame Charmaine says. I'm being. I'm get being afraid of the UK government. Knocking, but if that is just. The case then why play at all, exactly?

Just go to just go to the table. Be either hot, be neither hot nor cold, nor in the middle. I spit you from my mouth not because you're hot nor cold, because you're a tepid, sensible centrist, right? Here's the thing. You don't want to. Sacrifice your channel. You built this thing. You've made many sacrifices to build this. Thing all the hours of work all. The yes, all the things you've built, this great thing, this vehicle, you don't give up the vehicle, you just turn the

vehicle onto a new road, right? No ethics, no ethos. You need to. Have religion to have. Ethics. You need it. The the inverse reality. Is and This is why liberty. Being a adjunctive liberal frame is Luciferian to its core. Liberty Here's a here's a word concept fallacy of the day liberty often times gets. Coded as freedom. These two things are not the same thing. Freedom is often found in servitude. When you serve God truly, justly, you become free.

You become free of all the evils of the world or you become detached. You became, you become, you're given the ability to become free of them are the things that will pull you down, which will lead to derivations, to derelictions, to we know what ask. A A hear about his transgender friends. Or his gay friends, right? And he was supporting those people long before he got the call. We all got the call, by the way. That's what Charlie Kirk was. That was the call.

Now you make your decision. If you're a small channel like myself. The worst they can do, really. Is just delete the channel. Get to someone like him now. They could do something more with him. So as I said, I'm not dismerging Norman. This might be a good tactical move. But like like Charlene says here. Just delete the channel. You read that concern, go make some other. Go make some other thing. Talk about movies if you're going to.

View the channel into something completely away from what? You're what you were. Doing before go talk about movies. I think he tried doing that. I think he tried making a video game channel who made that didn't work out. But make Dark Soul videos. I I see them all the time. There's like, you know, Major. Major channels you could just go talk about like, you know. Go talk with nerd Roddick and Mauler and and the and the was it casual drinker? You could just do that wrestling

content. Yeah, you could just go do wrestling, man. Oops. And I get it. I went from last year talking almost exclusively about political theory. And now because of my own personal situation, moving into Orthodoxy, now the show's moving to Orthodoxy and it's got, and I've lost many people. And that's fine. It's just that's what you're going to do. You sacrifice, you build something. And you put it out there. Hey, I'd like Mahler too. I was. I was watching.

Every. EFAP for many, many years. In fact, EFAP was a big influence into how I want to construct Friend or Fed. That's serious. We have a new series coming up, hopefully soon, but. Again, this is not. Criticism just for criticism's sake. There's many options you have. If you're concerned about your safety, you can just drop the politics all together and you will. And it will. It will suck, you will lose a lot of people, but you'll gain in 3-4 years and you'll be fine.

But if you're I, I'm going to guess that. What a a would like to be is an. Is an ex Piers Morgan? Piers Morgan's going to retire sometime and I'm sure that he would like to take that spot. So this is a triangulation. Some people do, as Richard Spencer has what he is. Just supports the. NATO empire he supports that he thinks that's good. You know, I'm more ambivalent about the current the current empire than him.

But I'm realistic to know that the kind of romantic nationalism that is trying to be GED up in the Ukrainian cause is it's a play. It's it's a, you know, the you, you basically it's it's another pro wrestling scenario. Are you? Yeah. But it's not a play to the to the 2 million Ukrainians who died. It's certainly not a. It's not a play. It wasn't a play for many of the. Ukrainians who got involved in the war, period. It wasn't a play for many Ukrainians. Who, who had been annexed?

By Russia, for 250 years at least, that was a history they were given. It wasn't a play for them to suddenly be given in 1991 a chance at being a sovereign nation and making its own choices for itself and the people. Responded to that.

And people dysphoria all over the West from Winnipeg and Toronto and Chicago and many other places going back to Ukraine to teach Ukraine's Ukrainian to bring back the church, to re establish it as an actual real country, a sovereign nation, nation, country, civilization, whatever you want to. Obviously it didn't work out. It's now become the victim of the human sacrifice ritual. Go check out me and Jim talking about this. Last stream. No, who I'm not.

I'm calling him out for having a tranny friend. And as far as I can tell, if you are saying you're right wing and you're promoting transgenderism, you're you're not right wing, you're being played. If you have a look between 1946 and 2000. The America has intervened 81 times in foreign elections. That is, other countries are trying to have the democratic elections and America doesn't like the outcome that the people are going to vote for.

So they intervene to ensure that the force that they want wins 81 times between 1946 and 2000. Now, if your government literally has come about due to foreign intervention by the American empire, can you really be a nationalist for that nation are? You just a vassal. State and this is one of the reasons. Why, I've been at pains to. Try to demonstrate to people that a Britain is a vassal. Well, hang on a second. America came to creation because of.

Being a vessel state. Of the of the British. Empire what? Oops, what's it? What are you talking about also? Post Soviet. Union there was a whole bunch. Of new nations. Created. Out. Out of nowhere, like Poland hadn't been his. Own. Nation state. For. Quite some time even predating predating the Soviet Union, and now is the most dominant economic zone in all of Europe. Huh. What? What? I'm not an academic, I have no letters behind my name, but even I can. I can.

Read and. Tie my shoes. It's amazing. All of the American empire. So in some ways it's a nonsense. To think about. British interests separate from the role it plays within the greater American empire, just in the interests of realism. This is something clearly that Tony Blair understands, something a lot of you understand. But the practical reality is you're not going to be able to. Bust out of it. Through nationalism. Unless your nationalism gets an even more powerful backer.

But then Britain is reduced to the status of one of these poor. Nations and I actually. Think it's going on right now. I think that the Civil War narrative is being pushed by foreign powers. I've told I've said this before, right? It's. It's always foreign powers. It's. Never Britain. You know people blame the Jays for always being the perpetual victim, right? It's never them, it's everyone else. It's always someone else. Even when it's them, it's someone else. They draw us to it.

How could we stop? How could we stop it? You know who the biggest bitches in the world are? Really are? The British. The biggest didn't do nothings. Didn't do nothings is the British. My goodness, every time. Every single. Time as. Anyone ever brings? Anything. A legitimate or illegitimate or any kind of complaint, any historical current whatever to the British, you're always going to find some Brit who goes, wow, it's not us, it was the climate.

It was those damn Americans. It's the global American. Empire you know and not. The British Empire that spanned the globe. No, no, we just gave it up in 1945. Mysteriously for for reasons. Because we couldn't financially deal with it at what? I don't know why. Huh. What it it, it, it doesn't make sense. It never made sense. It only makes. Sense because you. Hear it and you just and you never question it, you go along with it. I mean, as long as you go along with it, it's fine.

But why, for example, does the entire world in general all look like the British Parliament? They all use some varying forms of the British parliamentary system. Weird. That's power, isn't it? That you can go anywhere in the world, even. In China, even Communist China still uses essentially elements of a Westphalian system. Ah, dear modern democracy, the way that we conceive from. Democracy in in the West. Is a British invention, not democracy, The idea that's.

Greek sure, but how it works in sort of like? Districts and zones and voting in Congress people which are just MPs and all the rest, that's all British. British common law. All of it. British, English, everyone. Speaks English. Sorry, Norman, I I think you're missing your your your purposely just skipping over who? Might. Be culpable, maybe, possibly just a little bit, and they'll use your. Genuine nationalist sentiment for. Their ends actually happening

right now, actually happening. I've been watching it happen. I've commented on it. You can go back and watch those videos. That's really what is happening. Foreign actors are trying to ferment. Civil. Conflict in the UK. They realise there are fissures, they realise there are real issues and they think they can profit off the genuine anger of British patriots at this moment. Probably work too. Nationalism. Is a very strong.

Motivating force. When the state runs out of options, it always turns to nationalism, always as a final resort. All communists in their right things admit that nationalism is a stronger driver to drive people to pick up a gun and die or fight than communism. In the abstract, yes. Someone's saying he's around this though. Yeah, again, I'm not disagreeing with his, with his, with him entirely in.

Theory, if you have a desire for sovereignty and there's people out there who have leverage on your sovereignty, they will use your sovereignty or they will use your desire against you. They will promise you just they will promise you the sovereignty and give you something else. The the the hardest pill to for me to swallow the Ukrainian Russia situation. Was Ukrainian. Sovereignty is no longer on the table. Maybe never was they had. They had a window. In time they squandered it.

They didn't get it. They could have become Poland. They didn't. They became. Ukraine and you can say, well, that's because of Russian intervention or because of British intervention. Or mismanagement. All the rest of it, sure, yeah, absolutely. But the problem is, is that you keep looking for a scapegoat here. It's the this, It's the that's the elites. It's the this. It's the bankers. They're people. They're human beings. Human beings can be held in and constrained essentially by a

worldview. If you want to change the people, you change the worldview. That's the that's what's, that's what's ahead of us. That's why you act locally. You create the groundswell. Beneath you. That will never work 'cause they're in control of everything. Well, if that's what you believe, then why are you talking about anything ever to Charlemagne's point, if you believe that the entire system is rigged?

And controlled by the. Nebulous woo evil, and there's no chance or no hope of anything ever happening, although we've been given an example by Jesus Christ and the Christians who overturned Rome in 300 years. The thing is, it's not possible in your lifetime. And that's the whole big freaking point, isn't it? It's got to be about you when you make it, all about you and you make it. About. My lifetime and it has.

To happen in my time and. With my name on it and it somehow be connected by me and my ideas have led to these things. When it all becomes a point of pride because you have no ethics, guess what? You lead into despair. The merchants of despair act on you because they play on your pride. What is sovereignty in the end of the day? What are the? Passions that keep a hold of it. What fuels it? Pride. Than glory. Lust, avarice, all the good prides, degeneracy. Is held together by these

things. When you begin to bring death to the world, when you begin to bring death to the passions you get, guess what? Freedom. You must liberate yourself. The true final revolution. Is a revolution against itself. That which holds you to it. Blaming others and. Creating the spooky wookies only leads only plays into their game, so the slop merchants, like I said, become. Subsidiaries of the Merchants of Despair. They don't want your solutions. They're not interested in solutions.

No solutions ever offered. What? What are you going to do? A Tony Blair's in control and all these. Foreign. Nationalists. OK. The the. The The global American empire is screwing you. What are you going to do? Not buy hamburgers? Don't go to McDonald's? What are? You going to do what? What? What's your What's your game plan exactly? Huh. Because you're because you're worried. About running out of scones, aren't you? Because. You want your viewership, you

don't want to sacrifice. Strangely enough, in the his world view, because he's an atheist, he believes that. Nothing means nothing. We're all one. Cosmic accident, but you're very scared of of dying or suffering or having your child suffer, aren't you? That would would call into the question this idea of. What is good? If if all we are are just accidental organisms, then nothing bad that happens to you is bad. Scones are good with clotted Kleenex. Exactly.

I agree, good school. I like sleeping in a nice. Bed I'm a. I'm a slave. To the flesh. As well, do you think an academic agent has a Funko pop collection? I don't know if he. Does, but he should. Replace all that with Funko Pops. Go John. Neurotic. No shame in it. Talk to Louise. Marvel movie, it's fine. You don't have to do. This you don't have to live this way. Constant messages show. Break the frame. Don't live like this. Do something.

James Burnham in The Managerial Revolution talks about how. During the early phases of World War 2, the Germans had no problem getting people enlisted. They had no problem with volunteers because people wanted to fight for the fatherland British. Oh, here we go. I got 4. More super chats to. Go and we'll give. You a we'll. Do a stream tomorrow doing some power washing and listening to Alex Jones talking with Tucker Carlson about the globalist death cult. Trans transdimensional

globalists. Little hats like like. Fish. We'll be talking about them tomorrow, but it's only. We hit that goal. We hit that goal. I'll do this trip. Establishment French. Establishment An American. Establishment had trouble. Recruiting in a time of mass unemployment. Why? Because people were not motivated to fight for abstract notions like liberty or justice or capitalism or, you know, whatever else. Whatever other slogans they threw at them, they weren't strong.

Whereas nationalism was strong. That's why Stalin hacked. But all these things are metaphysical claims at the end of the day. And this is your problem, being an atheist. You can't deal an anomalist, you can't deal with a metaphysical claim, whether it be glory or heroism or nationalism. Or Unity. Or whatever the claim is. It's a metaphysical claim. Whiteness doesn't really exist in the sense that every single group is going to. Fall into that group.

Eventually I saw this happen in Canada, live in Quebec. If you're not pure, then it doesn't matter if you're white or European. If you're not. French enough or specifically Quebec QC? Why enough? You're not pure then. You're not part of the in Group. You're on the out group. These will always happen. Differentiation happens. It's a human thing. It's part of the fallen nature. Sure, whatever you want to define it as, but it's a metaphysical claim, all of it. LG Brandon Walsh.

Good to see you back my. Friend LG says you earned it in your bag tonight, the fast feast. Line was a bar and I'll teach it to. My kids $10 appreciate you. When you're dealing with metaphysical claims, yes, people will always fight. People. Always. Ascend to a metaphysical claim transcendence is a desire to be more than. Oneself. But if you've been telling people that you're not anything but mush and there is no hope and there is no greater thing, and we're being. Controlled by the.

The JS or the? Diss or the that or the. Whatever group, sure. If that's your messaging, guess what? No one's going to fight for you. No one 's going to care about you. The long the. Night of the Long Pillow comes for us all. Then how do you how do? We switch it, go to liturgy, talk to a priest, become. Part of a community sacrifice, Give something. Do. Something I'll keep. Saying the same damn things over and. Over again because now I'm I'm past the point of being nice or

trying to appeal to people. Someone asked me recently. Someone I I I love and respect. To convince them I'm like, I don't, I'm not here. To convince you, man, it's here. Vengeful Sun is here. People's. Desire for violence. Is spilling over and if you don't see it and you want to deny it and you want to Pooh Pooh it and because it came. From me and you want to you. Want to reframe it? Go ahead, reframe it. Call, give it another name. I don't give a shit.

Whatever, whatever, whatever is good for you, go ahead, go ahead, do it. Ultimately, end of day, brass tacks, this is the war. You're in it. You're either an active combatant or you're a casualty, which you which you want to be to move to nationalism. To get Russians motivated to fight. That war. Every leader ultimately knows this, so it's part from. From the elite point of view,

it's. Powerful to get plebs to do what you want them to do. OK, But the zoom out a little bit and you'll see that unless you're a powerful empire in and of yourself, it's almost pointless to be a nationalist. It's almost pointless because you're just never going to. You're never going to escape the raw reality of this. Yes, it's basically pointless. Almost pointless. Almost pointless. Holding a little bit of hope. So if you're not an empire, if you if you haven't.

Rolled the geographical dice and lucked. Out on being part of an empire? You're screwed. That's the message. Eat your scones. They exist. I don't know. What's the operation here? Anything. Nothing. Just wait for it all. To collapse and. Maybe rebuild from the ruins I guess. Do you know how to do anything? Not really $5 from cool do appreciate you I've been drawn to. Orthodoxy. God bless after. Not attending any church for years due to many people's efforts, including myself.

Thank you on my T God bless. Yeah, thank you. Amen. I I will if you've been. Watching the show over the last four, whatever. Years I've gone from observing to participating to desiring nothing but Christ. Like there's a line from. One of Father Sir from Rose's books. Where he said, you know, he broke down almost in his heart was broken and he just called out and he just, he just. Wants he wants God, He want he just. Give me God and I know that feeling where it's the.

Only thing that makes sense. Anymore the only thing. That's like if this is. I look at my life and it's like I've had all the things, or I have all the things. I have all the things you're supposed to have and I'm doing all the. Things you're supposed to do and all that. And it's still not enough. It's still empty. You're still craving because you've been in this spiritual fast and now we. Get to feast, go to liturgy. Talk to a priest, get good with God and it is a feast. It's glory.

You suddenly feel at home and all the things that are worrying you and all the things that are keep coming. Down on you, pressuring you. Trying to trying to make you trying to draw you into. Despair trying to just draw you into this point of. Nihilism where hey, if you're not part of an empire I guess you're screwed. Get good with with the mud people. Learn to adapt. I guess or something like that. Just change your change your language, fit in. Don't rock any boats. Fuck that.

Fuck your boats. Tired of your boats, tired of your frame, tired of the lies. I'm tired of the seat. I'm tired by the rules. I'm tired of sitting here and watching it. And having no recourse and having that anxiety and knowing that your ass is out. In the wind, what do you do? Who do you have? Who do you really have? So if you don't have people who are conjoined, who are joined in, who are in communion. With something higher than themselves, with a purpose that

is not just them. And here and now and what we're doing, going to church and having. The Fellowship. Afterwards, the coffee hour. No, no, we're joined is something that's eternal, that is much bigger than us, ours. That is the the. Bricks that we use to build. Both symbolically and. Physically, if you don't have that, you have nothing. That's what was taken from us. That's what we take. Back cyber-shot fine. 499 I think.

You're the only channel untangling these Christmas lights, Jason. A released this series to resounding, huh? And I know I get it right and. His defenders are going to say he's he's kayfabe. Yeah, maybe it is. Maybe it is, but I don't think so. I clocked this in a long. Time ago I, you know I, I. Like me, some Don the pleb and. I watched a. Throw Don the pleb under the bus. I watched him throw a lot of the other people in the bus. A lot of names in the chat

tonight. A lot of people watching this. I'm sure a lot of people watching in the future will. Either. Say something or not say something and this guy's no good man. And when you start realizing. It and realize that it's not. And it's again, it's not just him. There are many others who filled a vacuum. Because they could. And promote a certain ideas and the. Ideas can be used. God bless. Right, Curtis Jarvan brings up some ideas I think are very useful, if useful.

In in nothing. Else, not from something I'm going to use, but to understand what other people are thinking. It's a weather. It's a weather pattern. I'm a weatherman. I'm telling you which way the wind blows. Do with that which will. That being said. When you get into these. To these ideas that these. Guys are going to tell you everything. And be able to. Discern anything they can't. They have no ethics. None. So they'll turn on a dime man, and that leaves your ass out. In the wind.

Too bad they've. Got you thinking and saying a whole bunch of stuff. And as soon as it becomes unpopular, because as soon as it becomes risky for them, they'll leave you in the frying pan. Never feast with those you would not fast with or those who would not fast with you. And again, I have nothing against them. It's not personal. It's not a judgement in terms of damn him or. I forgive him. Go ahead, it's easier for me. It's not. Personal. But I have I feel.

I have a responsibility. To anyone who watches his channel to try to break. That frame, because I'm trying to break that frame, I know how hard it is. I know how much of it will feel like a humiliation, but it's actually just a it's a true humbling and to get to acceptance you have to pass. Through humility, and humility comes in many. Levels and it's very difficult for the modern. For the modern man, because you feel. Like you're already brought low

and you have been in many ways. You are eating the food of the pigs, and that's why you have to have that realization. Like the prodigal son, get up and return to the father to repent and rebuild. Return, repent, rebuild. If I say nothing else, if I've given you nothing else in my entire life, use those three things. Return to the father, repent of your sins, and rebuild. Has to. Happen will happen. It's going to happen. We just got started. What's the best that you can hope for?

Really the best you can hope. For as I've talked about. Is a devolved self governed unit something like that which may be organised along ethnic lines? Maybe this might, I mean this in the current set up, if the elites decided right, well, rather than have, rather than try to have this force integration model, which is never going to work, we're actually going to do multiculturalism in the manner of the old Millet system, right? There's a, there's a black area

with a black tribal leader. There's a white area with a white tribal leader. There's a, you know, there's an Indian area with an Indian tribal leader. They all report in to the sovereign, right? That's the history of Britain. A. A. The Welsh. The Celts. The the the Britons. Were all separate areas kingdoms that you that landlords, Lords of the land who who gave up a part of their sovereignty to a king who led the entire Kingdom The Who united the.

Kingdoms and they just gave part of their. Sovereignty to this King who would rule the kingdoms on their behalf to stop conflict. The Medic. Conflict. The more the more alike people are. The more rivalists become, so you have a bunch of landlords who have a bunch of armies and peoples who are always in conflict. So, so say to end these conflicts, we're going to take a 10% of our or whatever of our sovereignty and put it into this office of the king. And the king will become the

arbiter of sovereignty itself. He'd become the seat of sovereignty. This. Is the. Importance of kings. This is why monarchy and hierarchy is is important. You don't get there without any other system. Doesn't exist. Can't work. That's why it's reducing to this. To tribalism. But even it splits apart to tribalism. The tribes will then need a Chieftain. They will elect one over time, because that's how hierarchies work.

That's how human beings do. So the only question is, are you going to submit to the authority? Are you going to try to make sure that? Whatever the future authority is for yourself or your children. Or your lineage will be a proper authority, authority maintained and informed by a proper morality. If that's not how it is, then you're they'll be ruled by some J or whatever someone of question moral standings.

And the only way you can assure their moral standing is by tying them to a tradition which is in hell, which is upheld by a religion. And if you're the West, that's Christianity. Get your head out your ass to the M to the Sultan. But whatever goes on. In those areas in. Those enclaves. Is up to the local. Is up to the local, leader Will Emmanuel says a very good thing. Speaking of elites, become a member. Become a member, $2.00 gets you in $25 is the preferred member status.

That's where you become the the true elite. Excelsior Club is the elite club. But for all the rest of you, 2 bucks that's it Give me some bucks easy. Or send over on Streamlabs. Send it over on PayPal. That's nice. I like to have it in my pocket. You know either way, like subscribe, share, do the things, do the. Do the free stuff. That's the mirror and. Shuckle Zone, the mirror and Shuckles do the free stuff. The mirror, the mirror and chuds give Me 2 bucks and send some

money, some money any other way. And the mirror and Chads, my friend, Mirror and chads do all the above. They like, subscribe, they share, they tell people that they'd let the people know whoever we're at and they send me money and they support and they're in the chat and they show up every time. Don Browning just sent 5 mirror and chef gifts. Don Browning, by the way, is one of the greatest Australians ever existing. She is a mirror and Chad of all mirror and Chads.

God bless you Don. OK. Let's get through this last. Little bit. And we'll sign off of the evening. They they haven't done that as. Of yet OK maybe at some point in the future they. Will, because that's a model like I've talked about that can endure for hundreds of years, whereas what we're doing now doesn't really endure as as we're seeing kind of falls apart. Look, Charlemagne said. You know, maybe he's doing something good for Britain and that's fine and whatever, he's

only. Charlie only cares about the UKI care about Australia only because I live here and so that I'm I'm in a different kind of zone all together. That being said, it's like, look mate, Britain is being invaded by, by the by the Muslims. You have areas in Britain where they're putting Christians in jail for. Praying. And yet allowing Muslim prayer to exist without, without any kind of question, you got to address that. That's a spiritual war.

It's literally a religious war. And right now a, A and maybe maybe his, his Persian influence is speaking, I don't know, maybe he doesn't have a problem with the Muslims because he could maybe get coded that way. I don't know. But either way, that's your problem right now in the UK. And if nationalism of a of a kind Christian nationalism white. Nationalism. British. Nationalism, something nationalism is going to be the calling card.

It's going to be the force against the invasion of Islam into your country, which, by the way, you should be concerned about. You got a daughter. Should be concerned about that. No guarantee. That the that the the the the Islam. Being. Being substantiated in your country is going to be the the secular kind or you're going to secularize them over time, Sure, maybe in 40-50 years. They'll just turn out to be. Nominal.

You know Muslims. You know Muslims in name, cultural Muslims. Sure, maybe. Or maybe they become Afghan, you become Afghanistan. Oops. Because at the moment. What they're doing is. They're they're kind of favouring. Or they have been favouring minority groups over the majority and that's kind of not a not a recipe that lasts. Actually, it does. It can last up to 80 years. All right. I think that'll. Do on nationalism. I, I I've kind of said. This quite a few times before

this is OK Basically is this. Word concept fallacy is not not. Notwithstanding we took this off here, it's not updating. Word concepts of fallacy is. Notwithstanding, right now in 2025. You're going to need if you're going to need. A calling card A. Frame a word, a thing, an ideology, a a vehicle. If it's not religious because you're not calling people to become religious, then it'll have to be something.

Secularist. Nationalism is the secular version of a religious side, a discernment, a a setting apart, a border. This people group versus this people group. Now I'm I'm all for destroying the. Dialectic. The only way you destroy the dialectic is breaking the frame. The dialectic upholds liberal frame, so if you want to get free of the dialectic, you got to break the frame. Want to do that? I'm your. I'm your friend, man. I'm your bud. You don't want to. Do that?

Well, guess what? You get what the frame gives you. And right now, if you're in the UK, it's giving you. Virulent Islam. Enjoy. Oh and Hinduism as well. You're becoming Singapore, but whereas Singapore. Was set up to maintain three desperate groups. In a region because they kind of existed there before and they're just trying to figure out a way to best.

Civilize those groups. You come from a civilization that's being transformed into a different civilization altogether, and maybe that means something to you and it isn't. But the core principles of Western. Civilization have been. Christianity. You need it. All the other things you like and you rely upon go away without it. Decency law. Community doesn't have to come down to skin, by the way. I've said this on the show Many. Times and draw. Heat for it, but.

I'm not a racialist at all in terms of skin color. I'm not an ethno. Guy, I am a cultural guy. Though, and I certainly am now a massively religious guy, you want to call? Me, a religious bigot. Here we go, Because without a clear idea of religion, tradition, people, region, culture, identity, language, history. Without. These things functioning along with a ruler.

And a religion. That substantiates those things, that all these things are operating in tandem and substantiating each other constantly. Without that, you do not have a civilization. If you don't have a civilization, guess what? Everything else doesn't matter. Does not matter, because we are. Civilizationalists. We exist in a civilizational frame. We. Build. Why? Because we do, that's what. We do.

We're builders. It's how we function, it's in our DNA, it's what we're called to do and anything that blocks us from doing that. Is enemy. Cannot exist. We cannot coexist with the. Primals, we can't coexist. With people who don't want to build and maintain civilization doesn't work. It's not their civilization versus ours. It's civilization itself, period. And you're either in the frame or you're out of it. And that civilizational frame is doesn't need. Liberalism. It's not required.

Break it for yourself. And for others, and for your children, and for your generations. That's where we're at now, folks. All right. Said my peace. If you enjoy this kind of content let me know, let put the comments. In the section put the. Comments in the comments section. And all the rest of it like subscribe and share. I'll be back tomorrow. We're we got four more. Can we get 4? More super.

Chats before we sign up on YouTube just 'cause I, yeah, I said it. So we're going to make the thing and we'll be back tomorrow if we hit that super chat. We'll be back. Tomorrow and we'll do a little bit, do a little power washing, listen to a little bit of of Alex Jones on the Tucker Carlson. What else is the chat saying? Julio says. I just wish mommy. And daddy would stop fighting for no reason. Wow, yeah, Charlemagne says. Nationalism is a frame the British people are using to

fight back. The best move is a guide the people in that frame rather than attack it with no viable alternative. Exactly. I would prefer it to be a different. I would prefer to be. You know, even Anglicanism. Anglicanism at this point would be better. There's just now a massive fracture within the Anglican Church, a schism that's happening between more traditional Anglicans in in Africa.

God bless. And you know, they're there's basically saying, yeah, this whole woman, female Archbishop of Canterbury, Yeah, no, this is how deep it runs. You don't even be concerned about. Just the politics of it. It's seeping into all other forms and guys like A and many others are sitting there going. What's happening? How's this? Happening. Well, if you're not part of an empire, I guess you just have to suck it up and deal with it. No. Says who? Why? Because you may not.

Because you might run out of scones this week. No, not going to happen. Not without a. Fight. Let's see here. Julio. Says good stream but. Did not convince me the need for this. I'm not here to convince you, cool dude says. Do you think A could have heritage? Related reasons for not being concerned about the huge number of Muslims. Yeah, for sure. Although he's part Welsh, right? So whatever. I don't. I don't really mean. Possibly it's a fair attack or fair question.

I. Think it's I think I. Would say would be more about that the academic doesn't have a defense against this thing. If your. If your whole entire world view distills down to nominalism, rejection of the metaphysical and, and and pure forms of normalism, materialism, then all of these things, these occurrences, these people groups become equatable. There is no differentiation really.

There is something that benefits you more than others, but as long as you you can find a benefit, as long as you can find a way to benefit, then everything remains the same. It's just, you know, 1 empire or another. One category. Or another There's no ethic. Holding this thing. There's no nominal value, and even if you, you can say something contrary to that, but your your. Worldview as an atheist. Is baked in it accidental life? Everything is an accident.

Everything is, you know, you. There is no mind, it's all. Biochemical processing in the brain. Etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. Well then none of it means anything. Doesn't matter, just don't suffer. Get to sleep in your warm bed. As long as the flesh. Is is cared for? Then everything else. Is going to be OK because you're just here to satisfy the fleshy desires. Make sure. You're well fed. So whichever way you can do that, it's good. And I'm not out. Here saying, advocating that

everyone. Needs. Everyone needs to be a martyr or sacrifice. Themselves for. 'Cause as, as Charlie said, just you can just stop talking. You can just stop, right? Go do something else. Go work at a. Cafe or some of that. But you can't, right? Because you only want to move parallel. You want to move up or parallel, you never want to move down. And that would be the sacrifice, right? Stop doing what you're doing, OK? What else do I do? Well, either change the.

Channel to something to talk about, something you maybe you don't even want to talk about, or something that's coded low class. Or give it up all entirely and go work the. 711. I've applied, I don't care. You know it's about. Putting food on the. Table taking care of my. Taking care of. My family and. Substantiating an ethic for myself and my family, which will carry on through my through my

generations. That doesn't have to be with a show, but it does have to. Happen and I. Can't make that I couldn't do the show. Presenting myself. As something that I'm not and that doesn't make me better than anybody. It's just somebody saying I can't do that. And when people do, if people are doing that, it mystifies me. It's like, well. Why would you even do that? Do. Something else Julie says. Anything. I'm still bitter. When he called you up? No, no, no.

I was never bitter. I was never bitter in. The in the first place. And he and also Julio, he never called me up. It was Black Horse. Blackface, horse, whatever he's saying, that was that's. That's. Who who took a shot at me and I had to punch him in the digital Dick. So as a A and I, I was on his show. He brought Black Horse on who who misrepresented me. I called out Black Horse and that was that's the conflict. I had no compliment professionally, otherwise I, I.

Know you want. To bring this into a dialectic. To a fight, it's. Not like I said, I I don't. Care about the man. I'm criticizing what he's putting out there. If he's different behind the scenes. God bless him, I hope he is, but that'd be like saying like if I criticize. The Catholics I got. AI got AI. Oh I have a burning problem with the Pope. Like what? No. Cyber shows his Black Horse has a sore ass. He's always mad about something or someone.

Yeah, yeah. Well, I won't get into that whole thing, but yeah, all right. Folks, Charlie says A, A is cool, he's doing what his thing. Whatever. I just don't want Americans to believe. Any of that crap in the video? Yeah, exactly. I don't. I don't want British people to believe that, you know, I, I do I, you can speculate wildly. Onto his reasons and stuff like that. And I'm I'm fine with whatever reason he is. Hey, whatever reason he has is

his reason. You know it's what it is, but same time not calling it out and not saying hey you this kind of. Thinking leads to. Bad results. I mean, what else we're doing here? Why bother having a channel? If not doing that, ladies and. Gentlemen, thank you so much. Appreciate each and everyone of you. We'll be back. We're at six to 10. I know I got some private chat, so anyways. Check out tomorrow. You might be back with some with some.

Power washing and I appreciate you can always send me contributions after the stream, like subscribe, do all the things. I appreciate each and everyone of you, and we'll be back again soon. And take a look for a new show. That might be on the horizon, just trying to get some. Confirmations, but I. Appreciate it. Thank you everyone in the chat and I'll talk to you soon. I am Jason Maranchuk and it's later than you think. This is the church, Richard and his family. Belong to.

Here he goes to. Sunday school. There are other churches in town for people who worship in ways different from Richard's family. Millwood has a radio and television station. The programs come from this building. Many people, they are the men and women who act on these programs. Some men operate the big television cameras, Others. Control the pictures as. They go out over the air. They see to it that Richard gets the right program at the right time. He often watches television at

home. The programs are fun and. Sometimes he learns. A great deal from them. Then there are the movies. The Andersons go off into the neighborhood theater 1 evening every week. Richard's father goes bowling. He belongs. To a bowling league with. Some of his friends, that's his favorite evening recreation at night when Richard. Goes to bed. He may have thought very little about his community. What he has done for it and what it has done for him. But the community's work never

stops. There's bread to be baked, bread which Richard will eat tomorrow. There's milk to be processed, milk which Richard will drink tomorrow. There's the newspaper to be printed for people to read in the morning, and electricity to be made, and water to be pumped and filtered, and telephone calls to be put through day and night. So the work in Richard's community goes on day after day, night after night, people working for each other, depending on each other all.

Of them. Partners in making their community a better place in which to live. There is nothing wrong with your television set. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. The.