The recommendation that at this moment , up to the day , google is doing on automated headlines . They are very dangerous Still . Well , not very dangerous . They're actually stupid .
Welcome to the latest episode of Marketers of the Universe . We have a really exciting lineup of topics . Today , we're starting by exploring a recent report released by the Adaptivist group called Digital Etiquette Mind the Generational Gap . We are going to look at how we think that can affect those in the marketing space and beyond .
That conversation is going to be led by our digital marketing coordinator , freya Wilcox . After that , we are jumping into Performance Max with the Brew Digital Paid Media Managers . Nasha Naseira will be leading a conversation around whether Performance Max is actually any good .
It is nearing the end of May already , and for me that means that I will soon be going on paternity leave , so you can expect from our episodes in June and July that you'll have a new host . Hopefully they won't outshine me and I'll be back in August , but we'll have to wait and see . For now , though , let's get on with the podcast .
Hi everyone . You may have heard me in some early podcast episodes . My name is Freya and I was previously the digital marketing intern . I'm now back , better than ever , as a digital marketing coordinator and I'm here today as the sort of token Gen Z representative to speak about the new digital marketing etiquette report .
So recently , the Adaptivist group have published their digital etiquette report , in which they surveyed 4,000 knowledge workers across the UK , us , canada , australia and Germany to better understand the pain points and untapped potential in intergenerational enterprises in an attempt to learn how to cater to the modern workplace challenges .
Here discussing this report with me today is the lovely Mark Bundle , our senior email manager and , potentially more importantly , my manager and our wonderful account manager , kieran O'Neill . I think people of all generations might have something to say about this report . It's open to the public , so if you're interested , go have a look . We can link it below .
Personally , I think it has some really great points and some less sound points , but I'm interested in both your overall thoughts and opinions . So let's start with Kieran .
Misinterpreting tone and context . Yeah , I , I can understand it from both ends of the generations , even from gen z to to boomer . I mean , misinterpretation is , in life in general , is rife , isn't it ? We experience it pretty much every day . I would say it's worth encouraging your employees , employers and so on to expect misinterpretation problems in the office .
So you just go yeah , this is going to be misinterpretation and and in context and tone of voice and stuff , you then establish respect because you understand that that's going to happen . You build a code around that . You've got to be flexible , avoid stereotyping to the person or about the person as well . Understand that you want to learn from each other .
In some cases , you can tailor your communication style as well . All of those things will help you stop misinterpreting tone and context pretty early on in the report .
It states that 43 percent of people say that misinterpreting tone or context is one of the biggest issues they face when it comes to working with different generations . I would have to agree , for me personally , that misinterpreting tone and context is definitely something that I deal with . I can't lie .
This often leads to me sending large amounts of smiley faces to people so they understand . I'm not angry or upset , especially if I'm correcting people . So if you've ever had an email review from me , you'll see what I mean .
But I'm interested to see your opinion here mark as well , on tackling tone and context , especially when it comes to remote work yeah , I think what kieran said about tailoring is probably the key .
For me , emojis are definitely king amongst younger kind of generations , I think . Um , I kind of stand at this as an older millennial veering towards gen x not quite there , thankfully , even though they had the really cool pepsi max ad , which I'm very jealous of back in the day .
But yes , if I'm communicating with people my age and under , I will generally try and cut across the tone or mark the tone with an emoji .
So if I'm putting a joy laughing , I'm putting a smile , I'm putting a little purple devil , to say kind of a bit cheesy and a bit naughty , whereas if I'm talking to people that are probably more senior to me , chances are I might not even be doing it by a like a slack or a text or something .
I might pick up the phone , I might do a face-to-face zoom call because it's much more appropriate . They're going to be . They're not going to have the same issues with taking time and context from a text that they will do from a face-to-face conversation .
So I think tailoring who you're talking to , or telling you how you're talking to who you're talking to , is quite important . It's going to recognize how you're talking to people how they need to be spoken to no , definitely .
I think choosing your platform , depending on who you're speaking to , is also really important . You'll be happy to know , as sort of the head of email , that in the report , email is described as unparalleled , enabling us to communicate with anyone anywhere and hosting our own servers . Even all of that wrapped up in functionality .
Email and choosing your platform is definitely a very good idea , depending on who you're speaking to . This report also looks into how remote work and hybrid work slash flexible scheduling opportunities affect each generation .
Considering different preferences and obligations amongst each age group , do you think there's a way that businesses can support their employees more , especially the ones who may struggle to work from home , for instance , or adapt to hybrid work using software such as slack , etc .
Let's start with kieran I mean it's interesting , isn't it ? There's been a lot around this since , uh , especially since covid happened and remote working , flexible , became the door every , every generation has , you know , different priorities .
Now , gen z have less dependence than millennials and gen x , which changes , uh , potentially how they they look at work-life balance and how they look at remote working and so on . But there isn't really a massive difference between each generation because there's benefits for everyone there .
To just understand what those benefits mean to each individual generation , to ensure that they're comfortable in the office and at home and just in the workforce in general , they're being catered to .
No , completely .
What I've seen and what I've read with , nearly all generations are enjoying hybrid working because it allows them to get things done around the house while still working effectively . They can tend to the kids , for instance , and for many of the generations , they enjoy the fact that they're not having to rat race it across the city , which saves them time .
It saves them money , keeps everyone's blood pressure a bit lower .
Very true , that's a very good point , mark . Have you got any thoughts ?
bit lower . Very true , that's a very good point mark . Have you got any thoughts ? Yeah , don't miss commuting at all an extra hour in the morning , in the evening , just to scream at traffic . I'm going to call out a company called the inclusive I think they're called the inclusive workplace company .
Now they work flex point , which is run by a former colleague , and they work on the basis of the hybrid or hybrid working . Remote working isn't kind of the only thing that you need to take into account for stuff like this . So to make sure you're a properly inclusive workplace , that is , across generations , across genders , etc .
There's other things to consider as well . So it might be that for Gen Z , for example , that working hours are more important .
I've been reflecting on that , because you want to knock out a game routine and then first thing in the morning , and so you want to start at 10 , um , whereas remote working for parents might be brilliant for the millennials and , uh , the exes , so that they can stay home and they can kind of have someone in the house loosely supervising children while they work .
So , yeah , there's there's different escorts of different benefits for different generations , I think , and it's just being able to support everyone how they're doing their thing , being able to come on things like Slack and being able to have Zoom calls brilliant . It creates some communication .
But I think actually having physical offices as well is still really important . Or if you're a smaller company , having a shared workspace that you use that you can go into . So if people do want to meet up , they do want to kind of have those walk , all the moments , as they're called .
That's really beneficial as well , because some people still want and still need that and , looking back to our last podcast where we talked about mental health , for me it's yeah , I think you really benefit as well . If you have to , if you need those social moments , you need that connection to still be able to have it no 100 , I agree .
I actually personally have only ever apart from retail roles , have only ever worked remote or hybrid . So it's really interesting to get your perspective of someone who has worked in the office nine to five , five days a week and someone who now works fully remote .
And I can definitely see the value of having an office or a location that you can go to and meet in person , because zoom and slack is great , but in person is just another level of depth and , leading on from your point on mental health , some of the stereotypes that are flagged in this report can potentially be quite harmful .
These stereotypes of things such as Gen Z being depicted as lazy as well as being easily distracted Easily distracted also . This stereotype also stretches to millennials . Do you think this is for any specific reason and is there a way that millennials Gen Z can help fight this and break the stereotype a little bit ?
This is one of those cases where the people doing the research are the important thing , and their generation and their biases , because , yes , millennials , gen Z , are less work-focused . I think that's fair to say . There are other priorities . We've got lives , we have mental health , we want balance .
We don't expect to commit to one company for 20 years and crack on with this career growth and progression and jumping around . But if you are , as an older person , taking on this research and doing this research , you're seeing these people spending more time on the screen , more time away from their desk doing other things and going .
Well , that's lazy , it's not , it's just different . I think it's making sure that we try and take those research biases out , which is obviously an incredibly difficult thing to do .
But yeah , the stereotypes are stereotypes and yeah , okay , there's probably a grounding for some of it , but a lot of it just depends on what lens you look at it through have you got any thoughts , kieran ?
Yeah , I absolutely agree with what Mark was saying . Unfortunately , we do live in a divided world which likes to dehumanize each and every one of us .
Obviously , with social media as well , being what we look at and read almost every day , those lazy stereotypes used to punch down on all of us are very prominent Gen Z are lazy , millennials are disorganized , gen x are bossy and boomers are tech illiterate . It's nonsense , I think .
One suggestion I have for gen z to help fight the stereotype which , by the way , millennials we had it , uh , when we entered the office as well . It's just silly , but open a line of communication with your older workers and also communicate with your line manager about it . I hear this quite a bit , that Gen Z have been set up to fail .
So if you feel unsupported , let people know . Make sure your employer is aware you want a roadmap to promotion . Let them know you're afraid of failure or you're unsure of soft skills that you see other people having , like phone etiquette and things like that , because you may have not been taught it , because , as you say , you have only ever worked remotely .
It's been a wild experience being millennial , where you get brought into something which does feel very traditional , then kind of having a bit of ownership over it and then all of a sudden you're just working remotely . But I'm really enjoying this kind of hybrid thing right now . That we're that we're doing .
I just hope that it does work for everyone , especially gen z you both have some very , very good points .
I think the reason some of the stereotypes have come about is that people are forgetting that gen z , some of their most formative years , were COVID . For me personally , I was 19 through to 21, . 18 through to 21 in lockdown , and that is when you're supposed to be doing the majority of your socialising . That is your first two years of uni .
I spent in my uni room locked down during COVID , so people need to go easy on Gen Z for a little bit . Anyway , anyway , my final question , and a bit of a fun one , a bizarre fact that has come out of this report is that 50% of workers feel annoyed when their younger colleagues don't have a pen .
I know it doesn't really apply to us because we work from home the majority of the time , but quick fire , yes , or in an office situation with someone not having a pen , annoy you , mark .
Yes , and that's why I bring spares .
Okay , Kieran .
No , I can type on my phone , on my Mac , far quicker than I can write , so I don't care .
And that's why Mark's bringing your pen hello everyone .
I'm your host , nasha , now . Typically you'll find me on the other side answering questions and diving into topics , but today we're switching things up a little bit because I'm in the hot seat as your host and I couldn't be more excited .
So today we're delving into a topic that's been making waves since Google rolled out this feature back in 2021 , and it continues to dominate discussions even now , in 2024 . If you guessed performance max , you're absolutely right , and if you're not familiar , you're in for a definite treat .
Joining me are two brilliant , talented colleagues of mine , michele and Ross , who are the paid media managers here in Brew Digital . Now , for our dear listeners who don't know , picture them as the Batman and Robin of our digital teen . Who is Batman , who is Robin ? That's up for a debate in another episode .
These two are like fire and ice when it comes to their opinions . Michele brings the heat while Ross keeps his cool , and it's always a fun time hearing the banter . That being said , personally , I'm very excited to hear what they have to say about Performance Max said . Personally , I'm very excited to hear what they have to say about Performance Max .
To kick things off , I'm sure for those out there who haven't tried experimenting yet with Performance Max or P-Max . They would want to know does it actually take performance to the max ? Ross over to you for the first question .
Thank you , nasir , for that colourful introduction . I'm hoping we can insert some boxing ring bell noises into the podcast . That'd be great For me . I'd say my experience with Max has been a bit of a mixed bag In terms of whether we love it or hate it . I'd say we're pretty agnostic . I can understand why people are pretty apprehensive about using PMAX .
It essentially means you're handing over the keys to your entire operation to Google and letting it run wild , and anyone that's got a run automation on Google could know it likes to take the Michael sometimes , so it needs to be monitored .
It can lead to a huge amount of wastage for advertisers and a lot of people are blissfully unaware because the lack of reporting capabilities . So there are ways around these , these , these lack of capabilities with with scripts , but your average joe running a pmax campaign isn't going to have this visibility .
For me personally , 95 of my experience with pmax has come with large ecomcom clients . Well , we've got kind of mountains of data and search volumes to feed the algorithms and we have seen some pretty good results .
But on the other side of that coin we've got your small service companies with relatively low budgets where I've definitely seen a struggle to kind of drive , the same level of performance .
Thank you , Ross , for your answer . That was very insightful , and to hear your personal opinion about PMax Michele . Same question Does it take performance to the max ? Do you love it ? Do you hate it ?
Thank you for the intro , nasia . That was beautiful . As a fully data-driven person , I can't love or hate anything . The only thing I can look is data , so no space for emotions or feelings . The real question is does it work or does it not work ?
Now , the way I try to explain clients how PMAX works is like a sports car one of the fastest that you can imagine . If you put them on a circuit , it will reach the highest performances . Put the same car on a country road you won't go anywhere . So performance max is the same .
If you pave the way and prepare everything around it , it will always perform well . If you want to use it and you don't give it all the necessities that it requires , it won't take it to the max , it will just waste your money .
That was brilliant , kelly . I love the sports car analogy . Okay , so moving on to the next question . This is a sentiment that's been buzzing around everywhere , from LinkedIn discussions to various forums and even other podcasts , while I was researching more about PMX .
So the general sentiment that I see going on , and here's the statement don't use PMX for lead gen or non-e-commerce campaigns . Naomi Kelly , I'm curious to hear your take on this . Do you agree and , most importantly , why ?
I disagree . I discovered recently that actually performance marks work better for lead gen than e-commerce , mainly because you want leads and you don't care as much how you get them . From what I've experienced so far On an e-commerce-based background , performance Max will limit , in a way , all your learnings . I'm not saying not use it .
You can , if you have to choose , prioritize it for lead gen , just because the journey to a conversion is somehow different , where , if a standard e-commerce purchase just follow a straight necessity , a lead gen may require a longer journey . The algorithm of performance marks will understand better the journey , in my opinion .
Interesting perspective , michele . Better the journey , in my opinion . Interesting perspective , michelle . It's clear we see the versatility in performance max . There are pros and cons there . I guess we just have to know how to apply it .
So , ross , I'm I'm eager to hear your thoughts on this yeah , I think it's important to add a bit of context here and that for e-commerce , pmax campaigns , we know the value of each conversion , which is the revenue from the sale that's attributed , whether that be a hat or a bath or whatever you're selling .
But when we talk about lead generation , the main problem we have is kind of lead quality , and this can be so drastically different from one lead to the next , and google can't necessarily distinguish between high quality and poor quality leads , which again presents a problem from an optimization standpoint .
How can you ensure that your lead quality is there , moving forwards if you don't have that visibility ?
One optimization we can do is to integrate customer relationship management tools CRM , so we can import offline conversion data , whether it's Salesforce , pipedrive or , in this case , hubspot , successfully linking this to Google Ads , which means we can enrich the campaigns with data and help Google understand lead conversion quality .
So , yeah , it's all about kind of making sure your audience signals are on point , so to speak .
Interesting take . Thank you so much . You so much , both . All right , the next statement . It's rather a controversial quote from a well-known marketer that's just begging for some discussion . I would not name the marketer , if you know . We know so .
When google first unveiled Performance Max , the idea was to cater to those businesses or individuals who didn't have the necessary skills or expertise to navigate the platform fully . Well , this marketer has stirred up the pot with the statement Performance Max is perfect for people who don't have the time or knowledge to optimize their campaigns .
Now , that's quite a bold claim and I'm very eager to hear what our experts think about it yes , I think the main thing for performance max that's what's going for it is that it's accessible , so they're very easy to set up . That's the . It's the equivalent of a plug and play campaign .
I think the main idea that people have is that you don't need an agency to run PMAX , but , that being said , it's definitely not a set and forget campaign , which I think is the mistake that a lot of people make .
You still have to optimize PMAX campaigns , as Michele mentioned in the last segment , to eke the best performance , and I would argue that PMAX has made things even harder to optimize with the lack of variables . Google actually lists .
One of the benefits of PMAX is transparent insights , but with almost any other campaign format , you can quickly identify areas that can be optimized Keyword scheduling , audiences whereas PMAX just doesn't give you this freedom . When PMAX first launched I just wanted to mention as well you can even add negatives .
I remember flagging this to support and they just said yeah , yeah , there's nothing we can do , sorry . So that used to be the general sentiment , so I would adjust Mr Patel's statement to PMAX is perfect for people whose mantra is ignorance is bliss , where they're not concerned with their campaign performance . I thought we said not to names .
I heard them . I heard them the name drop . What are your thoughts on Mr Patel's statement ?
What I can tell about my personal experience is that I had the chance to work for a very big company in UK and we were Google tester , so we had the chance to use Performance Max six months before it was released to the public . Now , what probably Mr Patel didn't consider is the fact that Google has products to sell .
If these products don't work , they will get changed . I'm talking about a bit old marketers now , if you remember smart shopping campaigns . So they came as the evolution and the solution of bringing shopping campaign to a next level . We tried it for a couple of years . They didn't work .
So that's when Google decided to evolve them into performance max and mix them with display discovery video and just put all together . Now , if this campaign type wasn't really working , after three years , google would already have released a different campaign type working . After three years , google would already have released a different campaign type .
So if they are not working , it's probably because we don't fully prepare the way they are easier to use . No , I think to set up performance match campaign is one of the most difficult things to do because of all the requirements . Ross mentioned some of them .
There's plenty of elements that you need to have ready , whether it's lead generation only or e-commerce , where you need to link all your data feed for shopping products , etc . So I would not say that Performance Max is a passpartout that you can use when you don't know what to do .
Thank you both for your insightful take on this . It's clear that , while Performance Max may offer some form of convenience , it's not a one-size-fits-all solution and I would say understanding the platform remains important for maximizing its effectiveness . In any sort of platform , you must know how to use it properly .
Okay , so , now that we've unpacked PMX a bit , thank you both for sharing your insights . So let's dive a little deeper . This question is especially helpful for our dear listeners who are interested in launching their first PMAX campaign . When is the best case to use Performance Max and when to avoid it ?
Things to do when you want to launch a Performance Max campaign . There's different steps . The basic one is to set up everything as Google tells you to do . Just follow the instructions . You can't go wrong there . Once you're finished , you need to improve those . You need to have , since the beginning , clear objectives .
You need to understand the budget for your campaign . You need to decide before going live if you want to optimize per conversion value or conversion volume . This makes a massive difference in the algorithm . You need to know at the beginning what you're selling . Am I selling products or I want to convert leads ?
Those are fundamental questions that you know you have to answer before starting . If we want to go in a bit more specialized way , the concept modes that Ross mentioned before especially if you are targeting in Europe and UK , make sure all your conversion tracking are properly set up and you need to understand the difference in your marketing objective .
The conversion goal and conversion action are two different moments in the journey of your client or potential lead , so you need to understand how those affect your final campaign . This one , I'll keep it for last , but it's really the most important one . Give it time . Even if it's AI driven , it needs time to learn .
Don't put it live and post it after two days . If you don't see results . It may need even two or three weeks . Be upfront immediately if you're setting up for a client and then audiences . We still see clients with accounts where the audiences are not fully set up .
So you can't pretend a campaign like this works well if you just target 7,000 million of people with different interests Over to you . Ross .
I think maybe it's better if I talk about areas to avoid , because Michele just expertly explained the best scenario for setting it up . One common mistake that you see people making is that people think you don't need to run PMAX alongside other activities . They'll be pausing their search or discovery campaigns .
This is not necessarily the best practice and I think if you pause search campaigns , for instance , you can end up jeopardizing campaign reach and performance , because PMAX does not use keywords the same way that search does or any format in that scene . So it's important to recognize the distinction between pmax and other campaigns .
It's not all things to all men can pay . We've touched on it previously . But obviously one common mistake is the kind of set forget attitude . Um , you do have to make adjustments . What little freedom you do get ?
you're gonna have to make optimizations to the best performance out of it give it time to home , cause your campaigns immediately and fully set up your audience right . Thank you so much , bill .
To wrap up our discussion and I believe this question will benefit both newcomers and seasoned marketers alike hear your best quick tips on how to structure performance max campaigns , whether it's about creative approach , bidding strategies , budget optimization , frequency . Maybe your top four three to four best quick tips first tip categorize .
Don't include different categories in the same campaign . I know it could be easy , but try to separate type of product in categories . The more granular you can go , the more your algorithm will be able to serve the ads to the right person . Try to start from macro category and then split the lower you go . Assets refresh .
It takes time to write 15 headlines and four descriptions , as Google requires , but you will have results on those and after two or three weeks you should consider to refresh all those elements . So don't launch the campaign and then , when Black Friday approach , reminds oh yeah , maybe I should change something . Don't tell Google .
I told you , but try to avoid to use their suggestions , the recommendation that at this moment , up to the day , google is doing on automated headlines . They are very dangerous . Still , well , not very dangerous . They're actually stupid . They are not able to understand really what you need . So keep your human people writing your ads . Don't trust the ai .
Anything else .
I'm missing ross one thing maybe to keep in mind is when you're kind of setting your , your bidding goals . Set a realistic goal , um , hopefully based off previous results . I think a lot of people's instinct tends to be they'll reach for the stars and they'll .
They'll set a goal , say , to achieve an 800% ROAS , when they've never achieved anything like this in the past . And what this means . If you're kind of setting a target ROAS too high or a CPA target too low , all you're doing is limiting the discovery section of the campaign .
It just means you'll be no longer discovering new audiences because Google's just desperately trying to achieve this unrealistic target . One thing to keep in mind is to stop optimizing every week . I think McKinley mentioned it in the last segment .
Google's cadence for learning phase is supposedly six weeks at least that's what they said in the latest update and every time you make a major change to a campaign , this resets , so you're just kind of pushing it back into learning phase every time . You do have to give it time to get the best results that is all we have time for today .
Thank you everyone for listening . We hope you found some useful snippets in this session that you can go and put into your own marketing strategy . We love making this content and we love sharing with you . So if you could recommend the show to one friend or colleague , please do feel free to follow us as well on whatever platform you listen to your podcast on .
And finally , thank you to the Brew Digital team for their research and input into today's session . I've been Hayden . These are the markets of the universe . Bye .