Welcome to make EdTech 100. I am LindyHoc Educator, K 12 Ed Tech Advisor, and your host. This is a podcast where we keep it real about what actually works in classrooms. No hype, no overwhelm, just practical strategies, honest stories and tools that make a real difference for teachers and students. So come along with me on a journey to make EdTech 100.
So if you didn't know, and if you're not keeping up, there's a lot happening with AI developments and advancements out there. So much so that I have only been barely keeping up, and it is my job to keep up. So I know it's bad and I know it's moving fast. I've been struggling for the last few years. To keep up because of all the advancements, but the last couple months especially have just been crazy. There's a lot of big jumps in AI capabilities.
So for this episode, I'm doing a little bit different. Instead of having a guest that I interview, I have an invited Erin on to be kind of like my co-host to help me just talk through and unpack all of the AI craziness from the past few months. So, welcome, Erin.
Thank you, Lindy, for having me. I'm flattered.
What do listeners need to know about you?
Yeah, well I've been a career educator, , in rural states as recently as the 2025 school year, but I've since pivoted to developer relations and community marketing at a tech company. And I always tell people my skillset, I'm not the most techie person. I'm not a developer or coder, but I'm the conduit between those really techie developer types.
And the average person, whether it's a teacher, an administrator, or small business owner, I can speak the language of both, and I'm somewhere in the middle.
Yep, same. Same with me. It's just I am very still much in. Education, career educators still in education. You made the hop full on to work for a tech company, but that's one of the reasons I wanted to bring you on today. First of all, you're one of the people that I keep up with most on social media 'cause you're always sharing really awesome tips and how you're using ai.
And when you were in the classroom still, you were sharing so many great things about how you were embracing the technology and teaching your students how to use it correctly and responsibly. I think you were my. Most followed person on LinkedIn in 2025 because you know, they did that little thing at the end of the year where they told you who you like, who you like most engaged with. I'm pretty sure you were , my most engaged with person, so I wanted to bring you on because you are threefold.
You're doing a lot with the tech yourself and keeping up with it yourself. You're also working for a tech company now, and it's based out of the Bay Area, right?
It is. Yes.
Yeah. So like you are, even though you're working remote from Wyoming, you're embedded in virtual calls all day long with those that are like, you know, the tech people in Silicon Valley. So you kind of have that perspective now. And then also you have the educator perspective. 'cause how many years did you teach?
I was a teacher for six 16 years. Uh, and I, I have my master's in K 12 ed leadership and a principal endorsement, but always preferred to be in the classroom. , Despite some of my family, my. Members that were career administrators, I thought the classroom was a better fit for me.
Your dad was an administrator, right?
Yep. And my identical principal. Yep.
right.
And my identical twin. Mm-hmm.
him on LinkedIn too, and every now and again I'm like, oh, it's Aaron. No, it's not Aaron. No, it's not.
Same DNA different person,
person. I love it. I still have to meet him in person sometime. E is it Eric?
Eric. Yep.
Eric? Eric and Aaron. Yeah, that's right. Okay. And he, yeah, he's educator too slash administrator. So, yeah. So point being, you bring all three of those different perspectives in to give listeners a really good idea of Where, where we're at with ai. So I wanna start with a story. There's something about TCA conference. It's always like the first week of February, and for the last. Two years.
All of the big AI companies have released like a big update like either right before right around February 1st, which E either right before or right during TCA last year, open AI released operator, which if you're not familiar, they've now rolled it into their agent feature, so it's no longer called operator. But at the time it was basically like their agentic.
And if you don't know what agent is, we're gonna dive into that, where you could actually tell it to go research a vacation that you wanted to take or draft an email. I had it in my Gmail, drafting my emails for me. Uh, and it would open up a browser within the window and all these things. So I was frantically scrambling at TCA next year, last year, excuse me, 2025 to make sure that.
I was making sure every one of my sessions, the people that came, knew what a agentic AI was and very, very, very few people did. Okay. Fast forward a year. I was just at TCAA couple weeks ago. First week of February, same thing. Huge announcements coming in. So OpenAI release codex, which we're gonna hopefully talk about your anthropic release, their Opus 4.6 model, which holy cow, I was actually texting my husband this morning.
Telling him that he needs to go check it out because now you can literally give it a Word document and it will edit the actual Word document and spit it back out to you. So before, I would always like upload a document. I'd ask for changes. It might give it to me. It might have given you a file that you could download, but you still had to do a lot of like copy pasting, formatting. Nope, it does all the formatting for you now. So that was released and then on top of all of that, there was.
All of this craziness going on with Claude Bot, open Claw and mbo. And if you're not familiar, we're gonna dive into that as well. So that was all going on in the midst of TCAI was like sharing TikTok videos just to kind of stay on top of it and inform my TikTok subscribers about it. And then so all of that was happening, right? I am, I actually had time to go to a few sessions at TCA this year.
I'm sitting in a session agentic browsers came up and the whole room, and it was a packed room and it was a pretty big room. Came to a halt with mass. Chaos for either a combination of, I think the majority of the chaos was they had never heard the word ag agentic. They had no idea what an age agentic browser meant. , The other little part of the chaos was immediate. They knew it, but they didn't know the feature that was being shown. And they immediately started talking about how to block it.
And the presenter did a really great job of making sure that it didn't totally change the course of the session, but I was just sitting there. going, oh my gosh, these like, we have some major work to do. We've been over the last year, agent a KI has been the big push behind a lot of the changes in updates. Would you agree or not agree, Erin?
Totally agree. I think a lot of us about two years ago saw copy, paste, chat. GPT is in a tab or cloud, whatever you're using, and we thought, wow, AI is so awesome. And the new version of it is it can do things. On your behalf or for you? I'll share how I previewed agen browsers with my students. I gave them a Google Doc in a high school social studies class that had a list of eight or nine questions about a historical topic.
They didn't have a textbook or a reading on, and they were supposed to go out and do some research, and it's like a background builder on the League of Nations. When was it founded? Which country came up with the idea? And I said, I just wanna watch how you do this to see, do you go to Google search? Do you go to chat? GPT? What tools do you use? But it was a trick because I knew most of them opened a Google tab and they copy paste the question to Google search. A couple of them used ai.
I let 'em finish. And then what I did is I took Comet browser, I opened the same Google Doc and I said, go find the answers and fill it in on my Google Doc. I hit run and then to be funny, I took my Comet browser water bottle and I went down the hall to get a drink.
Then I just watched my classroom through the window, so I was still kind of supervising him and they're like, it's opening tabs, it's researching, and then it's going back to the doc and it's typing an like, is he remote controlling this? What the heck? And then I would just wave at him through the window. And the reason I did that was 'cause. It was gonna show up eventually. Now it's in Google Chrome. Claude has a Chrome extension.
So if you're a Claude person, you get essentially the same thing and it can control your browser. And that was my moment of chaos where people thought it was a trick or it wasn't real, and it's just like, nope. That's what they can do now. 'cause they're built into your browser.
Yep. And yeah, if you've, if you've never seen an agentic browser or any sort of AI agent or agentic ai, it really does at first seem like a magic trick, like someone is pranking you. My students used to prank me all the time and like set sticky keys. On the keyboards and the computers in my classroom. And then, you know, somebody would it either I caught onto it pretty quickly, but then like somebody else would come in and start using the computer and think that the computer is possessed.
You know, 'cause they couldn't figure out the sticky keys. It's kind of like that experience, but like way more intense than sticky keys. And if you're not familiar, so a agentic AI is basically ai. That acts, and I always tell people when I say this, this creates a lot of anxiety. So I'm always like, take a deep breath. Seriously, take a deep breath. It acts autonomously.
So exactly what Aaron was saying, you're not now just like going to chat BT or Claude or Gemini and giving it a prompt and copy pasting over into a Google Doc, like it's editing and.
Adding to the Google Doc for you, it's autonomous, but you gave the perfect example of, I always add the caveat that it's autonomous with oversight because you gave it the Google Doc, you gave it the questions in the Google Doc that you wanted to do, so you gave it instructions as the human to say, this is what I want you to do. I want you to answer these questions about the League of Nations in this Google Doc.
Yep. And the way that I think of it, the super simple, not as nuanced definition is agent AI has tools. So it's kinda like if you gave chat. GPTA toolkit and it has a wrench for this job and a hammer for this job only. It might be a browser and it can do a search, and then it can call this service over here and then it can write to your word or your Google doc, and it's giving the same brain. That's the ai. The tools and now it's an agent.
So it could be a recurring schedule or a trigger like when I get an email from this person, do this, or Monday mornings at a 8:00 AM run this, , or like the browser example, you open up the tabs, it needs for context and say, go off and do this for me..
Yep. Exactly. And I always get the question at this point, they're like, okay, well what they still don't, if you're new to Agent ai, you may not still see the difference between a generative AI tool like chat, GBT, Jim and I, Claude An agentic AI tool or an AI agent, which there are subtle differences between the two, which we probably won't get into today. , , the way I explain it is , let's use email for an example chat, GPT, generative ai.
You have to go open the large language model, or you might have it built in to like Gmail. Now there's some generative built in there, right? But you still have to prompt it to say, write this email, review it, and hit send. Agentic ai, you tell it. I want you to respond to my emails. Tell everyone that I'm gonna be out next week at the NCC Conference in Seattle. And it goes, opens the email, drafts that response and hits send. That's agentic ai. That's that autonomous part to it.
Which is a scary thing 'cause people always go, what if it sends the wrong message to the wrong person? Or books the wrong flight for me, or whatever task you gave it.
It is scary and you know, it's, there's a lot of discussion. We'll get into this a little bit more when we talk about the claw bot, mot bot, whatever they're calling it now thing, but it's also. Uh, it opens the question about security risk and data privacy, right? Like now you're giving, you, you, we've already been talking for years three over three years since chat GPD was released about not putting an education like PII, making sure you're a FERPA compliant, right?
Don't put PII into a large language model now. It's like 20 steps more than that of not only just don't give it your information, but now you're literally giving the , AI access to things like your email that might have really sensitive information in it, depending upon what your job is. But if you're a teacher or a school administrator, your email, your, if you use Google Drive or OneDrive, you're giving it. Access to that potentially has a lot of sensitive info.
So that's a huge discussion around agent to AI and education is that data privacy. And that's probably one of the reasons why. All those educators, not all the majority of the educators in that session room at TCA, just had no idea. Like I even heard someone say, I'm so confused. She was looking around like this because she was like, she had never even heard the word ag.
And then you put Ag Agentic browser in there and you know, a whole nother level of confusion because it's no secret that K 12 education has a lot of barriers to innovation. One of those being ferpa, data privacy. We're working with miners under the age of 18, so the tech tends to move slower. And not just that, but other reasons as well than it does in other industries in.
Yep. And I think if you haven't come to this realization yet, it's pretty unanimous by people who see this stuff every day in 2026 if you're relying on anything in a web browser or on a computer to assess your students' learning or track their progress. I'm not saying they're all using Chrome. Having an agent do it for them. I'm saying they very well could be even with free tools. So if it's something in a Google Doc, I'll share. Here's an example.
One way people said to monitor for AI doing the work of students is go back to the revision history of a Google Doc and see if they copied and pasted in a giant four page essay all in one go. Like that was ai. That was cheating. Uh, that's not my preferred way. If that's what you do, okay, here's the counter argument. And now a browser agent could be doing that for them, and it's not gonna just copy and paste one chunk from the tab. They did the prompt in.
It's actually gonna be in Canvas or in Schoology or in Google classroom, navigating. It's gonna show the person's logged in. They made this edit at this time, and then they opened here. And I've even had students show me, you can prompt it to write out the thing, slowly put in a couple of typos, then go back and edit them. And all of this is running without the kid touching the keyboard. But the revision history is gonna look organic. It's gonna look like a person did it.
That came up in that session that I was at, at TCA is like, and even like Bri teaching, they have an inspect writing tool. Built into that to show if any big blocks were copy pasted or whatever. But now these agents, when I gave operator a year ago access to my email, I sat there and watched it type out the email and look exactly what it would look like if I was typing out the email.
Maybe the only difference, which would be a subtle difference that you'd have to really watch is the typing speed and typos. The AI isn't gonna have typos and be using the backspace like a human would when you're naturally just typing something out. And the educators in that session, some of them piped up and said, well, I was already having that problem with students, figuring out that teachers are using these tools to see if I was copying and pasting a paragraph. So what do they do?
They write their essay in a large language model, do a split screen, and then they type it. They're literally just like I think of back in the day, you see all of like the movies where they made the kids write lines and that was their punishment. So guess what? Now? Now the kid is literally, that assignment a
It's,
punishment.
it's like typing practice to the kid. They didn't come up with the, the thinking or the ideating or the editing. It's just like, I'll copy it manually. Yeah. And there's. There's chrome extensions. I saw a student make one that you paste in your essay, so probably chat. GPT generated it.
The chrome extension is open in your browser and it's gonna type it at a human speed and you can dictate that and you just paste in your whole essay and it's gonna go into your Google Doc and character by character. Make it look on the revision history like a human did it. So I doubt many students use that, but they're free and they're on the internet, so. The crafty ones are trying to find ways, and you shouldn't assume that's the best way to filter for cheating.
If you're listening to this and you're like, oh my gosh, I need to go try this myself. I need to know what's going on or what tools I should use or what tools students are using to do this kind of stuff. I wanna give like a layered approach here. The first one , would be the agents within. Chat, GBT. Claude. I'm trying to think. Gemini doesn't really have agents yet, I don't think. No.
Nope. Just built into the browser now.
Yeah. Um, I'm gonna open in another tab, but, um, yeah, built in the browser, which I'll get to in a second. Okay. So those have been there for a while, like over a year, I would say maybe a little over a year for chat. GPT. So that's number one. If you go into chat, GPT, hit the tools button, turn on agents, and people are always like, well, I don't know what to do. If you don't know what to do to start, guess what? It's an ai so you ask it. What can you do for me? How
Yeah.
me? Right? And if you have your in chat, GPT especially, where if you have the setting turned on where it learns you and it learns information from your different chats, if you use chat GPTA lot. It's gonna know you're a high school social studies teacher. It knows everything about my work, so I have to give it no context. Now when I go in there, so if I go in there and I'm like, Hey, what can I do with you? It'll start giving me very customized examples.
And then from there you could even say, give me a prompt, copy, paste, put the prompt in. And just, that's the way I start exploring. These types of tools now. So there's that. Then the next level would be, we mentioned it, the Chrome browser, which is by far the most common browser, and I would say by far, the most common browser in K 12 education now has Gemini built into it.
So if you haven't noticed over the last few months in the top right corner, you now have a Gemini button that you can click if you don't see it. could be if you're logged into your school account, it's either that your school has blocked it in some way, or schools, depending upon their settings with Google Workspace, can do either a rapid release or a scheduled release.
So you might be on a scheduled release where it hasn't been, you don't get the new features for a while until after they're, they're out there. That's the one that, honestly, so I mentioned. The concept of in that TC, a session of agentic browsers came up, but then the presenter showed an example using the Gemini within Chrome. This is not a full agentic browser yet. And Aaron, you said it perfectly, it's actually not the most effective.
There's, when we get into like the comment and the atlas, those are way more effective than Gemini built within Chrome. Although I will say I've been using the Gemini built within Chrome a lot. The example that the presenter at TCA did, he had a, a question up or it was like a writing prompt or something and he hit the button. He just acted like a high school kid. Like, Hey dude, uh, I'm working on this problem and I can't figure out how, how to solve it. Can you solve it for me?
Solved copy pasted right into the Google Doc that's when the conversation got waylaid to oh, how do we block this
that's always the first question when it's educators, unfortunately. Um, well, and we all know this, what that presenter did, you could have done by switching tabs and copy and pasting. It's just the next evolution of the same technology now. It's built in and you can give it a tab group for context. That's what I usually do is like
Mm.
maybe a little research, a little docket goes in and a another page and say, look across these three tabs, do this task, write it out for me, and now it can use those instead of copying everything off of those pages, which you could have done two or three years ago now it just does it in the browser for you.
That's where I need to switch my workflow in my brain. 'cause for three years I, let's say I have a Google Doc open and a couple websites, and I wanna give the large language model the context of all of that. Actually, I just did this this morning of whatever it is that I'm doing. I would download the Google Doc and then I'd copy the links to the websites and put those into chat. GBT. It still saved me a ton of time, but it's that download, upload, copy, paste for each of those.
Now I just hit the Gemini button. already have the tabs open so I don't have to give it any context to what information I want it to pull in and summarize, or synthesize or whatever I want it to do. It's just right there, so it saves you that many more seconds from a productivity standpoint, from a student standpoint, it's that many more seconds saved and less steps to provide answers to , what we used to call Googleable questions, right?
And the other thing is remember that your students are gonna see all the ways to cheat. They're not gonna see on their TikTok or their YouTube shorts, all the cool things that can help you with researching and writing and keeping track of your schedule.
. If all they see is the cheating way, that's one of the reasons why I am a big fan of educators themselves have to share these technologies with their students instead of hoping the student doesn't know 'cause they're gonna find out or trying to block it, because a lot of us don't have the option to block it either. Your administration decides what goes into your Google apps for red account and they might listen to you, but probably not. Or a committee takes three months to decide.
So in the meantime you're stuck with it and you just gotta make it work.
Figure it out. Yep, for sure. And then so the last level of agentic browsers or, or well, or actually agentic browsers out there is, you mentioned perplexity has comment, chat. GPT has atlas. How are those different than the Gemini built within Google Chrome?
Yeah, so what Google and Claude did was basically say instead of rebuild the browser, we'll put an extension in Google Chrome. And let that control it. In a lot of ways, it was cheaper than, you know, hiring the people to develop a whole new browser. What perplexity did is they forked Chrome 'cause they basically copied the underlying architecture. The chrome extensions from your chrome browsers still work in perplexity comment, but they rebuilt it in a way that the agent.
Is foundational, it's baked in. Instead of add a Chrome extension, it comes with a whole sidebar and it has a couple different interfaces and it's still using large language models, but it's way more prone to taking action on your behalf. And I've had access to it since before it came out, just in the last two weeks. So like while you were at FETC in early February.
With the newest models like Opus 4.6 Running Comet browser, I tested it and it did a task autonomously for about 30 minutes, and it took between 175 and 190 actions. So think of that like scrolling, clicking. Typing a text field, basically how many movements you would take on a browser. It's, it's definitely not faster than if you were controlling your browser. I'd say it's half the speed, if not a little slower, but here's the power of it.
You set the task in a tab group and say, go work on this, and it runs in those tabs. Meanwhile, you're doing something else, so it's not like, oh, it's faster than air and clicking and typing and searching and scrolling. It's Aaron's doing that on the page. He wants to, and then in the background for 20 to 30 minutes, it's gonna run on its own and then say, okay, it's done. Or, okay, I hit a snag. Atlas is the same way. The difference is it's gonna use your chat GPT account.
So if you're somebody who's really invested in that platform, you have the projects and the context history. Some people like it. I personally was not that invested in it, so it didn't seem super useful for me. Like I wouldn't use that if you're not a chat GPT Power user. If somebody wants another one, DIA browser, DIA is another one that's been competing with Perplexity Comet. It actually came out before that and it has some built in Agentic capabilities and you can switch models.
If anyone used Arc browser, it's the same company that built Arc, that's probably my favorite browser of all time. They just made an AI native version of it called dia. There's a free version you can use, but the thing is, and, and one of the barriers to a lot of student uses the good models and the best versions of it, you need a subscription. So whereas the Gemini students can get a year of the pro plan for free, so a lot of them have access to the paid features.
Your district might enable 'em through your Google apps for red account, or they might have a, a student. AI Pro Plan. I believe it's the $20 a month one that they get for free if they're a student. So there, there's definitely more students have exposure to the Chrome extension than the standalone browser. . Lindy Hockenbary: I'm writing these all down by the way, and I'll put links into the show notes. I have not heard of Diaz, so I gotta check that out. And I'm with you.
I'm a pretty big power chat BT user, but I also use a lot. I use, I'm a big Claude user. I'm using Gemini now. Gemini three. I'm using Gemini. Way more than I ever have before. And I still was kind of like me the chat, GPT Atlas, , and I think that's why then I never got , back into the agentic browsers because I was like, I don't, I don't know, I'm not seeing it yet. So I need to get into comment some of these others and, and play around with them. Okay, so let's, we better move on.
So many other things to talk about. 'cause we haven't even talked about Codex yet. So one of the big. releases that opening, I did that first week of February was Codex Aaron, I've played with this a little bit. I know you've played with it a lot more and your new job sounds like you've played with it a lot more. So tell us about Codex. Full disclosure, I did spend an entire weekend living in it. Um, not 'cause,
Okay.
'cause Lindy,
more deep than I am.
I. Well, I think we all have test projects, right? So say for you when a New Claw model comes out, you're like, here's a go-to thing that I have a baseline of what good looks like. Codex is interesting because I think a lot of the vibe coding and coding apps have not been super relevant to teachers. 'cause they're like, what would I do with that? Like, I'm not a coder, I'm an English teacher, I'm a history teacher.
What Codex can do is it's basically chat GPTs model, but specifically for coding, and you don't have to open a terminal, so you don't have to go to the scary blinking black cursor box that feels like 1980s. That's intimidating to non coders like.
like a terminal dos looking thing.
Yep, because cloud code you have to run in a terminal. I know there's a web version now, but originally, so basically chat, GPT tried to build the same thing, but it's a standalone app on the Mac. It's now also on Windows, and it runs in the web, so it has access to your local files. This is one thing that's different. If you have chat GPT in your browser tab. It can't see your downloads, it can't see your local files. Codex can, and people think, well, I'm not gonna build an app or a website.
Even if you can't, you know, that's not your use case. You could take a folder. Uh, here's one use case. I do some analytics reporting. So download the CSV files or the spreadsheets, put 'em in a local folder, then open Codex and say, go in that folder. And help me analyze all of this data versus before you could probably attach files and do all sorts of importing and exporting in the web now can do that in a folder on your computer.
Um, and then like one of the ways I used to test it, I think a lot of us have vibe coded in a webpage or you make one for yourself. My, I make my kids do that for themselves and I took a.
kids vibe coding, huh? I love it.
Maya, I think he was 10 at the time. 10 or 11. My fifth grade son built his own math review game without touching a key. He just voice dictated into an app and it worked, um, which I think everyone should be doing, but. Digressing back to Codex. I took a website that took me weeks and a bunch of revisions, and I was like, Hey, let's redo this, make it look different, change the content and move it to a different domain.
And I did something that the previous best way I knew how to do took me, I don't know, 10 or 12 hours, and this was about a 30 minute process. And it totally revised the look, the design, the colors. And then I thought, okay, this was really good at the designing part. What's a, what's a design thing that a non-technical person would use? So I actually had it design. My LinkedIn banner and some graphics. 'cause people are like, oh, it's a coding model, but I'm not a coder.
Well, part of, I mean, design is fundamentally code. They're all just pixels and ones and zeros. It compared to what I could do in Canva or Figma. It made a way better LinkedIn banner in about. A a minute, and here's the best part to my local computer, I'd say put it in this folder and call it designs. That's not something that you could do with chat GPT or clot on the web. 'cause you always have to export the artifact and download the PDF or whatever it's in. I could just point it to my local.
tell it to save in like a certain fuller on your computer.
Yep.
Wow. Interesting.
And then you can, you can back it up. So a lot of people use GitHub and if you're intimidated, I was once so intimidated by GitHub and I'm not an expert. Think of GitHub, like Google Drive for tech. People like, and you can put documents in it. You don't have to build apps and websites. But it's just a way to back things up and then also share it. Just like a lot of educators go, oh, that form, that spreadsheet is in my Google Drive. Here's a link. That's essentially what GitHub does.
You can say, take the project we put on my local machine, like those LinkedIn banners and this whole website, and sync it to my GitHub, and it's just like, boom. Running this command done. It's committed like it's backed up there. So I do think there are a lot of uses for teachers, even if you're not computer science and building apps, that that is what it's best at. But it can do all sorts of other things for you as well, and it can do it on your local machine from a web app.
You don't need to be in a terminal.
okay, so I'm hearing the big changes and differences with Codex is that download from an app, so it's more user friendly than Claude Code, which was kind of the leader in AI coding basically up until February 1st ish. And then it can also. Actually save files in specific folders for you. And then the thing I noticed in the little bit of time I've spent in there, I went in and just so you guys know, like I am not a coder. I am not that kind of technical person.
So I went in and I could have asked it, Hey, what can you build for me? But when you go in there, it actually has some sample prompts for you. So I just clicked the first one. It was something like build a sneak game, something super easy and just watched it run. The thing that I was like, oh, this is a game changer, is it not only built the game, it built the app, but then it tested.
The app and if you have never worked, like Aaron's, now in the tech world, I work with a lot of ed tech companies, so I get immersed in that world. There is a job at every, at least one person, at every company that builds software called a qa. They're like the QA engineer. And QA stands for quality assurance. And what that person does is test and make sure their software works. Work looks for bugs, right? Codex is doing that.
And I'm not being the hype gal that's saying that Codex is gonna take every QA engineer's job. I'm not saying that, but I want you to think about the job disruption that could be caused by the AI and oh, and here's another thing about Codex, which I have not fact checked, but I heard that OpenAI actually had AI create codex. Have you heard that? Do you know if that's true?
Yes. , They publicly said they used their newest model to build it. So basically the tool they were building helped them build the tool, which is one of those weird advantages in the ai. World. Yeah, and if you've played with other ones, here's what I'd say about Codex. It's very persistent. So I've used Claude to do a task.
Claude can feel , it's more warm, it's more enthusiastic, it's more human, but it also can feel kind of a DHD and kind of jump around and quickly do this, and it's not as good as, look, it's not as good at looking through things in, in detail. I did a project with Codex just last night and multiple times the little working bar ran for more than 20 minutes before it actually output something. And I've never seen a clawed model be that persistent.
'cause it'll either take a shortcut, hallucinate, make something up, give you like A-T-L-D-R. Codex definitely seems more thorough and. Kind of gruff, like, okay, here's the thing, it's done, and it's not as warm of a personality as Claude models.
Which makes sense. Just knowing the difference between Anthropic and OpenAI, the companies that make both of those, and just knowing the vibe difference between Claude and Chat GBT, that kind of makes sense , that their coding models , would do the same thing. Okay, so, so that's a biggie. There's a lot to unpack. There. And I know at the surface you might meant, but like really stop and think about the fact that we now have AI, building AI that is huge.
And we have already been moving so quickly with AI advancements. Now that AI is building ai, you know how much quicker we're gonna be moving with AI advancements. AI thinks, and works way, faster, way, way, way, and way is not even the right. Word there. A lot faster, lot faster than humans.
And it doesn't sleep, it doesn't take vacations or PTO days.
It doesn't have bio break needs.
can spawn subagents to make work, you know, delegate jobs on, like you and I can't spawn, , executive assistants to go through our emails or do things for us.
One other big update and then if we have time, we'll dig a little bit more into the effects of education. We might have to do a part two of this episode just focused on education. Should needs to change, not change, adapt, not adapt. But I wanna make sure we talk about the Claude bot slash open claw slash mt bot. Fun. , So again, I was watching this go down while I was at tca.
And by the way, and granted I only had a chance to go to a few sessions, I had tons of conversations with educators and I presented five or six different sessions. And not once did I have somebody mention this to me. At the education conference, which I thought was super interesting. , And just like maybe a difference in people's algorithms. 'cause it was all over all of my social media algorithms. That's all I could see. So A guy created what? And he, he called it Claude Bot. To start with.
Well then, and it was C-L-A-W-D-B-O-T, then people thought it, it was related to Claude, C-L-A-U-D-E, which is the large language model made by Anthropic. It was not, not associated at all. So then he quickly changed the name to Open Claw and basically, well, here you explain. Aaron, if, if you're comfortable, explain what Open Claw slash Claude bought is.
Well, and if teachers hadn't heard by then, the backstory is it's changed names three times, but you're exactly right.
was there a third one in there? What was
Yeah. Well, and that's what's funny 'cause I know you wanna bring this up. Mt Bought was a very quick change and what the founder of this open source project said was Anthropic didn't like that. It sounded like Claude, even though it was spelled differently, I'm guessing somebody sent a letter from a lawyer
Yeah.
is like, okay, I'll change it to Molt Bot 'cause it, it molts and changes and evolves. And that's where Molt book came from.
Oh,
Is semi satirical. Someone said, let's make a website for all these new agents. That's like social media, you know, LinkedIn, essentially for the agents to post, not the humans. Then the founder of the project changed it, a third different name to Open Claw, which it got acquired. He got acquired by Open AI this weekend. So now. Yeah. He, he and the founder, uh, Sam Altman said it'll stay open source. It's not gonna go away, but he's joining our team, whatever that's gonna look like.
But you know, this, just like Atlas and Codex, it's probably gonna be a standalone product in chat GPT any day now.
Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So I missed a whole, I was thinking it was Molt bought not Molt book. I missed a whole name in there. All right. But Moral of the story is it's landed on open claw
Yep.
basically only really technical people are doing it because you have to kind of create and run your own terminal. The Best Buy in San Francisco. Ran out of Mac Minis because people were going out and buying Mac Minis to be, 'cause you really need like a dedicated computer because it has to have 24 7 uptime and basically it's running agent for you. Or is it agents, is it multiple agents or just one agent that's like just working 24 7.
Either one. It's up to you.
one. Okay. So you could have multiple agents potentially doing different things, but you have to give it access, like we were talking about, the security, you know, data privacy risk there, you have to give it access to everything, but then it can literally. pretty much anything digital for you. Like save this file, send this email, , put this event on my calendar for me.
And you have to use, like a lot of people were using WhatsApp send the instructions to the agents to say, you know, go put this on my calendar, delete this event off my calendar, et cetera, et cetera.
Yeah. Here's how I view Open Claw. We'll stick with that name and hope he doesn't change it a fourth time. It doesn't do anything new. You could have done all of this stuff with Claude Code, or if you were a techie person, you could have duct taped your own version of this together. But there was no hope of an average person making that work. And now what's unique about Open Claw is just the interface. In other words. If you like WhatsApp, you have group chats there. You're in the app.
You can use it to talk to your agent, but then it can go out and use all these other tools. It can search the internet, it can search specific websites. It can see files or folders you have saved in the cloud somewhere, like your Google Drive, your notion, your GitHub, whatever, and it can do things with that. It's also misleading. I tell people all the time, don't buy a Mac Mini. , I have one under my desk. Mine is on a raspberry pie. Number one, a raspberry pie is way cheaper than a Mac mini.
Also easier to find in stock right now, but your local Facebook marketplace is probably gonna have a bunch of used very gently used Mac Minis any day. Now, as people realize the, the tool is free, but the services you have to plug into it to run are not. So I think of it like a house. He basically built the app and said, here you go. It's free. You can download. But to make it work, you have to plug it into things that cost money to run. The biggest one is an AI tool.
Like it needs a A brain, it needs chat, GBT, Claude Gemini. You can use anyone. You can get an API key for those cost money. So his app without those connections is like having an empty house that's not connected to the power grid. Connected to the sewer. It doesn't have electricity. It doesn't have plumbing. Well, that's a pretty worthless house. It looks cool, especially that it's free, but it's really about how you connect it to things.
And what I would do and what I am doing is put it on a different device. It just doesn't have to be powerful. You don't need a fancy pc.
Mac device.
No. And if you do, 'cause it's an old one, just know for anything to work, it has to be on, has to be powered on and on the internet. So if it's a laptop, you're gonna have to change the battery settings and the sleep settings to never go to sleep. , But something like a raspberry pie can run it. I think somewhere between one to two gigs of memory is what people find. It's good enough. So like any old laptop from the last 10 years could run this. Any old PC you don't still use could run this.
But the other thing is you want it on a separate device so it doesn't have access to all of your permissions, your browser, your folders, like as a teacher, definitely not on your work computer.
No,
Um.
of tech directors that would be up my throat. Yeah. Do you or your work. Emails, accounts at
Yes. The, the way to think of it is you wanna build it in a box and keep it contained. Like you don't want to give it that email. So what's interesting, some people give their open call agent their own accounts to things like their own Gmail account, their own iCloud. , One guy now has. Two Dropbox subscriptions, one for him and one for his agents. And some things are shared between those.
But his important, like PII containing files or finances are in his personal Dropbox that his open claw agents can't see. So. Really, the moral of the story is you wanna start with it on a different device and don't give it access to anything. You wouldn't trust a human, like a say a student teacher. You would not give a student teacher your bank account password and your personal laptop 24 7. So you definitely don't wanna give it to an agent.
Really good advice. And that's the big, the things that I have heard that's like the big differences with open claw is that now it's allowed agents to go externally is one part of it. Like you said, like you could do a lot of the things that you could do. With open Claw, with like the chat GPT agents over the last year, but now it can go external. And then that leads to the second thing, which is now the agents can talk to each other, talk in quotes. Right.
And so that's where the malt book I had been calling it, malt Bot, the Malt book came into play, which is basically like a Reddit. For AI agents and they've gone crazy and they're chatting and they've like made up a religion and they're talking about religions and they're, and it's freaking people out. , This is a big, we've gotta wrap up here and I know it was a big, heavy thing to leave the episode on.
, But I think it just goes back to that foundational AI literacy that when you understand that the AI is just acting with instructions, you understand that. The agents were given instructions to do that, and they're basically replicating Reddit thread because that's what they have to go on. So they're just kind of like recreating that in mt book in their own little agent land.
Yep. And, and I would also remind people that there's no way to verify all the things on there are actually coming from an agent at that. Any person could say, go on and write all these things. Go make up your own. Religion and the agent is gonna do what it's been prompted to do. So I don't know how much of that is authentically happening, like an agent spontaneously went and posted versus somebody thought it'd be funny to create these conversations.
Yep.
but
their agent to go like say, Hey, let's go start another religion
Yep. Yep. And that.
a good point. I.
A, a variation of that same mt book style site that's been freaking people out. We've all seen the Upwork, the TaskRabbit, the hire a person to, uh, do this little project in Photoshop or make this webpage for you. There have now been some sites pop up where agents need humans to do things in the physical world and they will pay people
What
do the tasks. So it's like an Upwork for agents to find humans. Um, and that's, uh, just a whole new world of like, okay, they, they can't go in the world and turn a knob or go to a physical location yet.
embodied
Yep, yep.
till they're embodied ai. We currently have non embodied ais Wait till they're embodied. Yeah.
Yeah. But.
I hadn't heard that one.
Yeah, my, my biggest takeaway with Open Claw is you'll spend way more time trying to make it work than you will find useful things for it to do. That's one.
Yep.
other is if there, if there is something useful, it's making the technology accessible to people. So my example is my family. Calendar my kids' wrestling meets right now. They're what days do they have student council meetings in the morning, I wanted to build a thing that I could say, Hey, in a telegram or a WhatsApp chat, my wife in plain language can say, what's the schedule today? , Where's the next wrestling meet?
And something can look across the context it needs and say, yeah, in a telegram chat, here's your answer. That's really the only advantage, , and it is difficult to set up. So if you don't know what you're doing, make sure you follow a good tutorial or ask somebody who's done it a couple of times. 'cause it's easy to put API keys in a place you don't want them or give it permission to do something that you're not gonna wanna trust it to do.
It's pretty technical. That's why a very nichey group are the only ones. Really doing it, which are still quite a lot of people. , But like you just said, it just got bought by Open ai, so just wait until it's embedded in chat, GPT and Atlas, their agent taking browser and yada yada yada. And that's the takeaway that I want educators to take from this is.
I know we covered a lot and there's a lot that we said that is unknown and potentially scary and really overwhelming when you think of the effects on integrity of student work. I wanted to get more into that, but alas, there were just too many updates and things to talk about. So maybe we'll do a whole nother episode on that. Like how, actually multiple episodes to think about, you know, how do you adapt?
And adjust because some people are saying , no, we shouldn't adapt and adjust, but I don't know how we wouldn't, and formal education just is not gonna remain. Relevant, in my opinion, if we don't adapt and adjust. So there you go. There's my, my parting thoughts. Thank you Erin, so much for coming and chatting with me and providing silicon. I'm gonna say you're providing the Silicon Valley perspective, even though you are in Wyoming, you're
Yeah,
that.
and what I know is due to working with really smart people that are light years ahead of me and just distilling little useful bits that a teacher or an administrator, someone like you and I would actually put to use.
Yep, for sure. Awesome. All right. Thank you so much.
Thank you, Lindy. Thanks for joining Make EdTech 100. I know educator time is valuable and I'm honored you choose to spend yours with me. For more EdTech strategies you can use tomorrow and ways to bring me to your school or event, head to LindyHoc.com. If this episode resonated, hit subscribe so you don't miss the next one. I'm LindyHoc. Go forth and make EdTech 100.