"Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria" Part 2: Panic! At The Endocrinologist.

Music Yo! Dude, smoothies are such bullshit. Hahaha! What? Welcome to Mike's Hot Takes! Dude, what are you talking about, buddy? I've been fucking lied to. Everyone is telling me to drink smoothies. They're like, because you know, I drink too much coffee in the morning and then I go to the gym and then I'm like, dead tired and I'm just like a black hole for like three hours. Yeah.

And they like try a smoothie instead of breakfast. And so now I'm drinking smoothies and I drink a smoothie and then like 30 minutes later I'm fucking starving. No, smoothies are delicious. Yeah, the idea that they're gonna stay with you is false. We're back to my beef with soup and salad. Why? What's the point of this? I want to be done eating. I want to go do things other than eating. Do you want to go grab a spoon of peanut butter now?

No, I think it's good. Actually, I think I'm at my best when I'm only running on like coffee, tums and well-butrin. I did see a sticker this weekend that just said, at my best, when I'm at my worst. Oh, that's pretty fun. I do feel like that is what you described. Well, maybe we have a tagline. Maybe we have a tagline. Maybe that's it. No, I got a tagline for us. Don't worry about it. Don't worry about it. You thought about it in advance? I thought about it well.

I was falling asleep so it might be terrible. All right, give it to me. Hi, everybody, and welcome to the SaaS report. Wait, what? Are we not talking about the SaaS report? Oh, God. Jesus Christ. Okay, no more before you go to bed. No more dream journal. Fuck your taglines. No more thinking of it in advance. Oh, my God. You know what? We're trying. We're doing our best. Are we doing our best? I am Michael Hobs. I am Aubrey Gordon.

If you would like to support the show, you can do that at patreon.com slash maintenance phase. Michael. Aubrey. Today, we're continuing our conversation about rapid onset gender dysphoria. Yes. So Aubrey, do you want to recap us? On what we learned last episode. Rapid onset gender dysphoria. Made its way into the news cycle, sounding very legitimate and diagnostic, and so on and so forth. But last time we learned that its origin was in basically like transphobic message boards.

Yes. And that the primary sort of storytellers around this were parents who appeared to be having a profoundly transphobic response. Or at the very least like high levels of discomfort with their own kids having come out as trans. Yes. Last week's episode was essentially a bizarre human centipede story where there's these parents whose kids come out as trans to them.

And they essentially speculate, oh, I don't think she's really trans. I think she's being pied pipered by the internet and her peers and the culture around her. And so I'm just going to assume that this is some sort of like fake temporary thing. And if I resist it long enough, she will drop it. And despite there being essentially no evidence for this, this narrative starts to appear in the mainstream media.

Eventually we have a poster abstract in an academic journal where a researcher named Lisa Litman does what looks like an exploration of this phenomenon. But it's actually just a survey of the same pretty small number of parents. So that doesn't really tell us anything about the phenomenon itself. It only tells us about the perceptions and beliefs of these parents. It would be very upset if there was research into gay people and the way that they got their data was by like asking James Dobson.

Why didn't you ask the gay people who were right there? So we are now going to do do do back to 2018. This is the first time we get mainstream quote unquote evidence for rapid onset gender dysphoria. This is the publication of the full version of that very, very brief study we talked about last episode by Lisa Litman. This is basically just an anonymous survey of a bunch of parents.

Lisa Litman posted recruitment advertisements on these three anti trans websites, asked parents to fill out this survey and then they held it out. There's 90 questions. That's it. That's the whole study. Gotcha. So there's going to be a lot of debate and discourse about this article, which we will get into.

But one of the most striking things about going back to the research for this episode is how almost all of the documents that this movement cites as part of its kind of evidence base for this narrative. How just openly low rent and transphobic they are. So we are going to read some excerpts from this study.

This is an excerpt from the results section where she is talking about parents describing the experience of hearing their kids come out to them as trans. 81% of the parents answered affirmatively that their child's announcement of being transgender came quote out of the blue without significant prior evidence of gender dysphoria. Almost a third of respondents noted that their child did not seem gender dysphoric when they made their announcement.

So weird dude. It's like, oh, they didn't they didn't seem like the agenda dysphoria when they told me they're trans. Did you believe it? Yeah. Yeah. Did they really sell it? I didn't seem gay when I told my parents I was gay. That's not that's not really for them to decide. This goes back to the post that we read last time around, right? Which is just like they didn't seem like they were deeply unhappy and tortured by their own body.

But whatever it was, right? Yeah. People are looking for like a deep sense of suffering. Also, I was lying. I did seem gay when I told my parents I was gay. But you seemed gay at every moment. I see that every moment of my entire life. Family photo that I've seen. I can hear our parents budding and you seem real gay. You actually seem super gay. All right. 69% of respondents believed that their child was using language that they found online when they quote unquote came out.

Come out in scare quotes. I had never seen that before I started researching this. Oh, man, this was all over our many, many, many anti LGBT testimonies. Oh, yeah. Oh, come on. Come on.

Yeah. Definitely. God. Of the 51 responses describing reasons why respondents thought their child was reproducing language they found online, and the top two reasons were that it didn't sound like their child's voice, and that the parent later looked online, and recognized the same words and phrases that their child used when they announced a transgender identity. One parent said quote, it seemed different from the way she usually talked.

I remember thinking it was like hearing someone who had memorized a lot of definitions for a vocabulary test. Another respondent said, the email my child sent to me read like all the narratives posted online almost word for word. The obvious explanation here is that like if your parents are kind of conservative or a little bit anti trans, you're gonna Google like things to say to them for the coming out process.

Also, like maybe that's something you come across and looking to talk to your parents about it. It also might be stuff that you come across in like figuring out your own identity stuff. Totally. There are lots and lots of ways that this could come to be that don't mean like, oh no, invasion of the body snatchers. I actually think the study is very useful and very interesting because it's a portrait of parental anxieties.

Yes. It says in these respondent answers, it says it mirrors language that I found online afterwards. So it's like their kids come out to those trans, they then immediately go on the internet, and they're like, where is she getting this stuff? They basically self-radicalize, right? They find these videos, they find tumblers, they find other things online, and then they start thinking that their kid is like some sort of automaton. My kid has been taken from me.

I feel completely hooked on this idea of like, what does it mean to say something gender dysphorically? Yeah, I know. Oh yes, that is the statement of gender dysphoric. Got it. She was doing the John Wayne voice the whole time she pulled. Seems a little, she kept saying partner. Da-ha-da-ha. So we're going to read one more excerpt and like this is, this is just unbelievable. Okay. Okay. The groups targeted for mocking by the friend groups are often heterosexual people and non-transgender people.

Sometimes animosity was also directed towards males, white people, gay and lesbian, non-transgender people, a romantic and a sexual people and quote unquote, TERFs. DARREN SPONS. DARREN SPONS. DARREN SPONS. Quo-o-d. Me, the writer of the story. One participant explained quote, they are constantly putting down straight white people for being privileged dumb and boring. Boring. Boring.

Another participant elaborated, in general cisgendered people are considered evil and unsupportive, regardless of their actual views on the topic. I fucking love this, regardless of their actual views. They call you transphobic, regardless of what you believe. What do you believe? My daughter's not trans? Yes, my daughter. Well, to be heterosexual, comfortable with the gender you were assigned at birth and non-minority places you in the most evil of categories with this group of friends.

Statement of opinions by the evil cisgendered population are considered phobic and discriminatory and are generally discounted as unenlightened. Another participant said quote, I hear them disparaging heterosexuality, marriage and nuclear families. What? Another participant said, on my daughter's tumblr blog, she has liked or favorited or reposted, disparaging comments about those who aren't transgender or seem to misunderstand the transgender identity.

Boy, if you are digging through your kid's tumblr likes. Dude, that's exactly where my brain went. I was like, this is a level of self-radicalization that is really alarming. Later in this paper, it says also as evidence that my daughter's being taken from me or whatever, she says she edited her diary. I was just about to make a diary joke about what she thinks I'm invading her privacy, which I wouldn't know if I didn't have to read her diary all the time.

If you're looking for someone who's being radicalized on the internet, may I introduce you to a mirror. No, I mean, that's also the social contagion thing is also fascinating too, right? Because it's clear that these parents are like whipping each other up and like, you know, they're posting, you know, quote unquote, research that shows that like trans people don't really have high suicide rates, blah, blah, blah. Some of these stories from the parents are like honestly very sad.

It's like these these parents who essentially choose like online forums over their relationships with their own kids. A lot of them are just not in contact with their kids anymore because they can't handle just saying we love you no matter what. I actually think there's something a little bit more insidious even than like they're positing that all trans identities are fake. That's not what they're positing. They're positing that all trans identities are subject to the approval of cis people.

So this is actually the explicit project of this study. I am going to send you an excerpt from the conclusion. The conclusion of this exploratory study is that clinicians need to be very cautious before relying solely on self-report when adolescents and young adults seek social, medical or surgical transition. Adolescents and young adults are not trained medical professionals.

When they diagnose their own symptoms based on what they read on the internet and hear from their friends, it is quite possible for them to reach incorrect conclusions. It is the duty of the clinician when seeing a new adolescent or young adult patient seeking transition to perform their own evaluation and differential diagnosis to determine if the patient is correct or incorrect in their self-assessment of their symptoms and their conviction that they would benefit from transition.

If a patient is correct or incorrect in their self-assessment, it also says, this is a couple paragraphs later, the patient's history being significantly different than their parents' account of the child's history should be seen as a red flag that a more thorough investigation is needed. This was an entry point to weakening abortion protections in the US, was parental notification. That is essentially what they are advocating here.

It is actually good for these kids if you out them to their parents who they probably haven't told for a fucking reason. There is also the thing that we see in a lot of reactionary movements where the demands of the reactionaries are things that are already in place. They are like, we think kids should be assessed before they get hormones and surgery.

It is like, yes, they are. The barriers to getting hormones and surgeries a minor are extremely high and you can't transition without parental permission already. All of this really hinges on the idea that legal minors who are transgender have an undue amount of social power and influence and need to be checked. We are sick of cuddling these trans kids as a society.

My favorite thing about this study, not only on its face, it is essentially every other study of this kind, while trying to generate evidence of rapid onset gender dysphoria, it ends up generating evidence of the opposite. As one of the questions to these parents, it is like, when did your kid come out, did your kid go to a gender clinic, did your kid change their hair style, blah, blah, blah.

There is 256 parents who fill out this survey. Only 11% of their kids ended up getting hormones, 2.7% ended up getting puberty blockers and 2% ended up having surgery. So if it were the case that people are tricking doctors and giving them this care, if it were the case that doctors themselves, we're like tractor beaming kids through all these medical procedures, we would see way more than 10, 15% of kids getting gender affirming care.

I also think this is where it reveals the whole sort of endeavor, reveals itself to be less about concern and more about concern trolling, right? It's certainly not about the ins and outs of what health insurance covers. Yeah, no one gets to that. Or what doctors are permitted to do. Any of that kind of stuff, this is all just ways of eating around the edges, of a much bigger thing that they're trying to eliminate, which is the health care for trans people.

This is also, I mean, this episode, like all episodes that we do, is a extended sub-tweet of Brexit. And this is exactly what happened with Brexit, too. All we're asking for is a slightly updated arrangement. And then every single time they get what they want, they just push it farther and farther and farther. And they've ended up with the hardest imaginable Brexit. And you can't negotiate with people who are not actually saying things in good faith.

They're saying what they know you will agree to. And the minute you agree to it, they'll push you to the next quote-unquote reasonable ask. And that's what's happened in the UK. I was going to say something specific, but it's just the UK at this point. Yeah, the whole thing, the whole thing, all of it.

So this article comes out in August of 2018. In November of this year, Lisa Litman, the author of the paper, presents it at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. And there's a description of her presentation, which we're only reading because I think it's extremely funny. Following Dr. Litman's presentation, there was no applause. Sorry. Got her.

Okay, boop. Following Dr. Litman's presentation, there was no applause before several audience members launched into questions. Some were more civil than others, but pretty much all were critical. One audience member pointedly asked Dr. Litman what she had previously studied in her research, OB-GYN, public health issues. And whether she has worked with any transgender patients in the past, she has not. Narrative voice. Narrative voice. Her?

Another questioner at the end repeatedly asked her, why did you do this study? And what's wrong with taking on a different gender identity to which she would only say that we should keep open the possibility that there may be social contagion occurring. Yeah, I love that the questions are just like, why? Why? Why are you doing this? You know, there's like sputtering. What if it's neutral, but what if it's happening because of social contagion? You're just describing like fashion at this point?

Wow, we maybe. Why else would people be wearing cargo pants right now? So I think this is a good summary of the kind of academic response to this. And before you know it, there start to be more formal methodological critiques in various journals. So the main thing is that litman is trying to identify a phenomenon among kids that doesn't interview any kids. So just as a starting point, that is like pretty janky. And then secondly, we've got the parents who were recruited from anti-trans websites.

So it's not a remotely representative sample. And then it's even worse than that. So when litman recruits participants, you have to get like a consent form from everybody where it's like you sort of, this is what the study's about and you like sign it. And so in the consent form for this study, participants are told you are being asked to take part in a research study. If you have a child who when they were between the ages of 10 and 21, developed a sudden or rapid onset of gender dysphoria.

This may have occurred in the context of either increased social media internet use and or belonging to a friend group in which one or multiple friends have developed gender dysphoria and come out as transgender during a similar timeframe. So basically this is the conclusion of the study. Yeah. Being used on the consent form before people fill out the question there. Another way of putting this is, did your kid recently come out and have they found community among their peers?

So there's lots of discourse around this. There's open letters, there's petitions, there's lots of debate after this article comes out. And eventually on March 19th, 2019, the journal that published the paper republishes it.

So they issue a statement that says correcting the scientific record on gender incongruence and unapology where they say in discussion with two academic editors, a statistics reviewer and an academic who treats gender incongruence and adolescents, we've reached the conclusion of the study and the resultant data reported in the article represent a valid contribution to the scientific literature.

However, we have also determined that the study, including its goals, methodology and conclusions were not adequately framed in the published version and that these needed to be corrected. The changes include revisions of key sections such as title and abstract, which required us to republish the paper. This is a pretty big deal and like doesn't happen all that often, right?

The changes are so meaningful that they have to change the title and the abstract. So the previous title of the paper, the original title, was rapid onset gender dysphoria in adolescents and young adults, a study of parental reports and the updated title is parent reports of adolescent and young adults perceived to show signs of a rapid onset of gender dysphoria.

What I find so frustrating about this is that litmen herself and a lot of conservatives do like this weird victory lap about this statement, we've reached the conclusion that the study and the resultant data represent a valid contribution to the scientific literature.

Like the thing they say before the butt, essentially, because often times what you see, what you see in debates about this in reply guy world, is that you're like, yeah, the study is discredited and then people will be like, well, it wasn't retracted. Well, okay. This is like a movie poster where the quote from a critic is just like watchable. Yeah, it is so jammed with fake praise.

There's also an unbelievably tedious thing where originally Brown University where Lisa Lippman was employed puts out a press release saying like our researcher has a study that found these things. And after the these major corrections to the paper, Brown then deletes the press release from its website. So it's all this like outcry. And the president of Brown releases a statement saying we respect the academic freedom of everybody who works at Brown.

We don't want to sort of spread messages that might cause harm to the transgender community. We're leaving up the study like we're not retracting the study. We're not deleting it from anything. We're just deleting the press release. Yeah, ultimately, I don't know, relatively minor thing, but the the right ghost, ballistic, Ben Shapiro writes a piece for the daily wire called a Brown University researcher released a study about teens imitating their peers by turning trans.

The left went insane. So Brown caved. The left went insane. But has as a former dean of Harvard Medical School, I question Brown's failure to defend Lisa Lippman. They did defend her. Yeah. Fox News has Brown you censors gender dysphoria study worried that findings might invalidate the perspectives of transgender community. The study you can go look at the study and read the study. Nothing has been censored.

But I think this Brown University little dust up thing is indicative of one of the big shifts that starts happening over the course of the next couple years after 2019 is that the anti trans movement starts to become increasingly conspiratorial.

This whole kind of narrative when you think about it, it already kind of is a conspiracy theory in that it requires you to believe hundreds of doctors are giving these irreversible procedures to kids with no assessment because they're like so blinded by their like SJW trans ideology that like they don't even care. You know, you're already in a conspiracy mindset and then this whole thing of like Brown University censored the research in the trans activists are coming after us.

It creates this thing that we see in other conspiracy theories where everything becomes about like these meta debates about like you can't even ask the questions anymore. When you look at sort of anti trans rhetoric and these organizations of parents or whoever it is, they spend a huge amount of time on like she tried to publish her research. But then it was censored whether or not it was censored is kind of irrelevant to whether or not the narrative holds up on the merits, right?

Like people's work can be censored for political reasons, but it can also be censored because it's bad, right? Like research on flat earth also gets censored. Yeah, this actually appears in a later interview with one of the people who's kind of leading this crusade.

He says researchers who have touched this topic have been punished for their curiosity, just ask Lisa Litman ultimately her paper on the subject resulted in unnecessary correction by the journal that published it and the loss of Litman's academic affiliation with Brown University, which prioritized activist outrage over Litman's academic freedom. Wait, did she get fired? No, she left.

She left to go do anti trans advocacy all the time I found like her tweet announcing it, she says I'm thrilled to announce my excellent colleagues and I are launching a nonprofit research organization to study gender dysphoria. I will be leaving Brown University and appreciate the time I spent there. If you had good evidence, you would just be telling me the evidence and like sending me citations.

But the fact that you keep changing the subject to this like meta stuff is just like a little bit suspicious. Has the the tenor of like a tick tock video where it just cuts into like some lady screaming like you're impinging my first amendment rights and you're like we can have a conversation about this. But I'm guessing there's some other stuff going on here or the mask were those on like planes.

And then the other the other like I think very noticeable conspiratorial element among these rapid onset gender dysphoria boosters is that like there's a total refusal to engage with all of the counter evidence. So in the years after this paper is corrected, there's actual studies like actual surveys of trans kids that completely fail to confirm this diagnosis.

One of things we noticed in the anti-vax episodes was that like if anti-vax narratives were true, it would actually be very easy to tell. You would be able to say like oh they changed the vaccine schedule in like Michigan and then like one year later there was a massive spike in autism cases.

And it's kind of the same thing with rapid onset gender dysphoria that if there was this massive wave of kids showing up to gender clinics who you know a week ago, they saw a transition video and now they say they're trans or they have a lot of trauma and they're they're thinking their trans is like a coping mechanism or whatever. We would actually see that in the data and clinicians would see this too and it would show up in studies.

Yes. So there's a survey of 173 trans youth across 10 different clinics in Canada that concludes controlling for age and sex assigned at birth. Recent gender knowledge was not significantly associated with depressive symptoms, psychological distress, past diagnosis with mental health issues or neuro development disorders.

Gender dysphoria symptoms, self harm, past year suicide attempt, having gender supportive online friends, general support from online friends or transgender friends or transgender support from parents. We also have like much larger surveys. So in 2023 we get a survey of 27,000 participants where 40% of trans people say that they realized that they were trans in adolescents.

It doesn't mean they're bewitched. It doesn't mean they saw it on TikTok. It doesn't mean that they're not trans. It's just like a different way of discovering themselves. It's just not the case that we have a bunch of kids who are essentially confused and they see something on the internet and the next day they tell their parents I'm trans and the next week they tell the doctor I'm trans and then the week after that they're getting surgery.

I will say I remember the gender confusion as the lead message sort of era. One of the reasons that I recall it so vividly is that we had a volunteer leadership summit at one point and a trans woman attended wearing a t-shirt that just said, I'm not confused but you seem to be. Oh, that's good. That's very good. This is all shit that you come to when you're looking for reasons to disbelieve your kids when they tell you that they are trans.

That you're like, oh, the timing of it is wrong. The onset was too rapid or I didn't see you. I didn't observe you as being deeply, deeply unhappy or emotionally distraught about your gender. To me, it's just like so telling that it's like the minute somebody asks actual trans people, they're like, oh, that's not my experience at all.

Yeah, that probably should just be like the end of the debate then, rather than asking more people who are not trans kids and would have no way of knowing what the subjective experience of trans adolescence is. But then in 2023, we get another attempt to prove that rapid onset gender dysphoria exists. I know this is even worse, but we're not going to spend as much time on it. So this one is called rapid onset gender dysphoria.

Parent reports on 1,655 possible cases. So one of the co-authors of this is someone named Jay Michael Bailey, who I don't know how else but this, he's basically just like a disgraced sex researcher. So the scandal with him is all around his 2003 book called The Man Who Would Be Queen, the Science of Gender Bending and Transsexualism, where I know he's, we're just going to read it. I went to his website and it has like an excerpt of his book.

I just like that we got the blabbered side before you even said anything. You couldn't even start a sentence without just being like, I thought, what can I tell Aubrey about this guy? But I think I'm doing a show don't tell thing. Yeah, I got it. This is, I believe, the first five paragraphs of his book. And this is on his website. This is not like leaked secret documents.

This is, this is something he has put out as like, this is an exemplar of my work. The most expert cosmetic salesperson at the local upscale department store is a man. A female friend told me about him and intrigued. I went to see him. He was young, tall and African American and his head was shaven. His fingernails were long and covered with clear nail polish.

He watched him as he helped a woman choose the right makeup after he was done with her. I introduced myself. He was slightly taken aback that I a psychologist wanted to meet him. What? I don't know. But he also appeared slightly flattered. He told me his name was Edwin. Edwin is a feminine man. One of the most feminine men I have ever met.

I do not ask Edwin about his childhood because I do not need to. I already know that Edwin played with dolls and loathed football that his best friends were girls. There is some chance that if I ever see Edwin again, his name and appearance will be changed to those of a woman. Even for a gay man, Edwin's appearance and manner are exceedingly feminine. He would stand out in a gay bar, but he'd receive little romantic attention there. First of all, how do you know?

Yeah, what is this weird dig at Edwin? Oh, God. Yeah, I mean, gay men are like misogynistic as fuck on this stuff, but like when straight people talk about this shit, I'm like, take Edwin's name out of your mouth. Also, Femmes are getting laid. Don't worry about it. Wait, I have to take off my carpal tunnel splints. Hang on, hang on. Femmes are getting laid. Femmes. He is near the boundary of male and female and someday he may cross it. If he does, one primary motive will be lust. Mm-hmm.

One cannot understand transexualism without studying transexual sexuality. Transsexuals lead remarkable sex lives. Those who love men become women to attract them. Jesus Christ. Do I know? Those who love women become the women they love. Although transexuals are cultural hot commodities right now, writers have either been too shallow or too squeamish to give transexual sexuality the attention it deserves.

No longer. Also like trans writers have not been too shallow or too squeamish to write about transexuality. That's been happening for a long time. Right about it. Dude, this is the, this is the extra if he put on his own website. Jesus. It's fucking hell. That he's proud of. Sightyear, so one primary motive for transition is lust. For the stranger that you fucking met at Sephora. Yeah, you got to see you got to see this homo working at working at the mall.

Oh, by the way, exists set every Sephora. What do we do? J. Michael Bailey is like fairly open about the fact that he thinks there's only two kinds of transgender people. And one of them is basically gay dudes. They want to get men and they can't get them as a man. So they become a trans woman so they can get men. And then the other kind of transgender people is auto-guinephilic transexuals. People who basically are turned on by the idea of themselves being women.

So basically like they're sex perverts. It gives them a boner to dress up in women's clothes and live as a woman. And they're only doing it for this life long fetish. This is the buffalo bill of it all, yes? Yes, exactly. And so like, this is like the kind of rhetoric that you got in like the fucking 50s and 60s. And he's publishing this book in 2003. And he's still saying this shit now. He now has revised this to say that there's three kinds of trans people.

And the third one is Rapidonset gender dysphoria. This is you are now turning into Brian Cox in succession looking to anti-trans movements saying you are not serious people. Exactly. Exactly. But then, okay, so the other reason we're talking about Jay Michael Bailey is that one of the first steps of researching this guy was to go to his Wikipedia page. And mostly it's like a normal Wikipedia page. It has like career stuff. It has, you know, information about these various scandals.

And so I'm scrolling and scrolling. And then I get to the final section of his Wikipedia page, which is the fuck saw incident. What? And I was like, Mike, you have 180 pages of notes. Don't open a bunch of other tabs. Don't find out what the fuck the fuck saw incident was. But come on. I didn't have the strength. You and I know why we do this show. I didn't have the strength. Finding out about fuck saws. It's a non-zero factor. Okay. And then all day I'm thinking about it.

I'm like, what is the fuck saw incident? What is it? Also, I would just say anything involving a fuck saw is an incident. I'm in a... My death wish. It's not like a quiet evening with the fuck saw. Sunday afternoon. You're a fuck saw. Oh no, Michael, I might be destroyed. Okay, do you want to know what the fuck saw incident was? I don't know if I can take it. Okay, so 2011, he's a teacher at Northeastern. And he teaches about sexuality. He does sexuality classes.

And so he's doing an optional lecture on kink, like the kink community. And so he brings in two kinky people. I thought the fuck saw was going to be a joke name or something that a student came up with. This is what the kink performers call it. It's a saw, like a saw blade. You know that you use home construction. But if you take off the saw and you put on a dildo, then it's like a dildo going in and out. I'm doing this in my hand right now. You can't see it. So it's like a jackhammer.

It's like a dildo jackhammer basically. And so apparently they're having this class and they're describing having sex with this woman with the fuck saw. And one of them is like, you know, we actually have the fuck saw with us right now. Should we demonstrate this? Oh, hello students. I happen to have my fuck saw on me. It's in my civic outside. Give me a second. I brought it to school. Then they go out and they get the fuck saw. I love this.

This man like uses the fuck saw on this woman and brings her to like numerous orgasms. You're this is made up. This is fucking real. This is made up. This becomes like a whole big thing. And like the whole country is like clowning on this professor who like let this happen. Because apparently they're like, is this cool? And he's like, yeah, yeah, whatever. We're all adults here. There's eventually an interview with him in salon where they're like, what is like the deal with this whole outcry?

And he's saying like, it's not a big deal because it's like an optional lecture. All the kids in college are adults and he says it took no more than 10 minutes of the hour long presentation. So it's one fucking six amazing thing of 10 minutes of this woman just having orgasm after orgasm watching somebody have sex in a lecture hall for 10 minutes is a long amount of time. It's so boring honestly after the first one. Like how much fuck saw do we need? So that's that's J Michael Bailey.

Jesus hell. That's our guy. That was like a weird, long, I should know about the fuck saw. We're keeping it. Good. I love that you're like, this is totally inappropriate for a university. Let's just dedicate 25 minutes of our podcast. I wanted to be exactly one sixth of our podcast the way that it was one sixth of the lecture. Oh, good. I want to keep structural integrity. How many of the lecture halls full of students are we going to reach?

Yeah. So back to the reason why we're talking about the fuck saw this 2023 article that is attempting to prove the existence of rapid onset gender dysphoria. One of the authors is the fuck saw guy, J Michael Bailey. The other author is a woman named Susana D.O.S. and the way that the study comes about is J Michael Bailey goes to a conference organized by Susana D.O.S. and he's talking to her about this website that she founded called Parents of R.O.G.D. Kids.

She mentions that she has all of this data. She has a survey that she has sent to the users of this site. And that is the basis of this study. So right off the bat, you can tell that this has exactly the same problems as the previous study. Right? This is just essentially a sketchy online survey and its recruited parents who already believe in the concept of rapid onset gender dysphoria. So of course, they're going to report that they've seen it in their kids. That's why they're on this website.

But the kind of amazing thing is that both of those factors are even worse in this study. So first of all, the data is even sketchier because Susana D.O.S. is not her real name. J Michael Bailey says that like, oh, because the trans activists were so mean to Lisa Littman, she has no choice but to use a pseudonym. He says, my co-author Susana D.O.S. doesn't go by her real name. I don't even know it despite having met her in person once and spoken with her many times.

She uses a pseudonym to protect her family, especially her daughter, whom Susana believes has rapid onset gender dysphoria. This is just a lady who founded this website and then says that she surveyed people, but there's very little information about the sort of methodology and logistics of the survey. And secondly, this website that she founded parents of ROGD kids, I mean the previous study also recruited parents from these anti trans websites.

This website makes fourth wave now look like PFLAG. So if you go to the like our position, like the basic about us statement on their website, it says our position, one, identifying as the opposite gender is not normal. Oh, good. In most cases, it's a symptom of severe psychological pain or dysfunction or an attempt to resolve some other issue. Two, our children are subjected to strong cultural influences that promote transitioning.

Three, the gender affirmative model is a form of conversion therapy. What? I know. This is a rhetorical equivalent of a fucksaw. Okay. There were a fucksawing us. Not in the good way. For the current standard of care, the gender affirmative model is unproven. Five, our gender dysphoric children, youth and adults are being experimented on. Six, the gender affirmative model prolongs suffering and causes further trauma.

Seven, professionals who accept an individual self-diagnosis and propose medical intervention are negligent. Jesus Christmas. Eight, medical intervention for gender dysphoria should be a last resort. So this is very openly an anti-trans organization. As you know, my brain is broken in such a way that it can only be treated by recreationally watching the Montana legislature. Yes. And this was a huge, huge, huge fight last session.

Yeah. There were people making these sorts of claims about like kids are being rushed into transition. And the whole time I was watching it, I was like, in Montana? Yeah, I know. In Montana. Right. Like the places where the moral panic is the strongest are the places where it is also like the most disapproved of. It's just real nonsense and it's a real dead giveaway that people are just turning off their critical thinking brains at all.

They're just freaked out and their hypothalamus is like, this is the only party in brain that works right now. And so we're not going to spend as much time on this as we did on the lease of litmus survey. Mostly because this is essentially. Are we going to spend as much time on it as we did on the fucks off? No. Mostly because this is essentially the same thing again, but like even jankier. So in the sort of consent form, it says, who should complete the survey?

You should complete the survey if your child, a, had a relatively normal childhood without showing any signs of discomfort with their gender. And be suddenly seemingly out of the blue decided they identified as the opposite gender or some other quote unquote gender. Boy, gender and scare quotes is a new one or me. Just like the whole concept of it. I know. I don't fucking know.

And then in the recruitment criteria, they say that their respondents are reporting like they get like a median age of rapid onset gender dysphoria. And they say that the range is between three to greater than 25 years. So like what child at age three is doing rapid onset gender dysphoria? Like how would you like is the three year old on TikTok? Yeah. They say we limited subsequent analyses to parent reports on youths whose gender dysphoria was reported to begin between ages 11 and 21.

So why are you including people over 18? They're not children then. Yeah. Again, this guy's like such just like so non credible to me. He says he says this in interviews afterwards after this paper gets a lot of criticism. He says we identified 1655 cases of rapid onset gender dysphoria, a significant number for activists to ignore. You didn't identify cases. Yeah. These are not cases you identified parents. So that whole like for activists to ignore, I'm like, A, what are you doing?

Yeah. And B, like what else have people been ignoring? Like this again, this is the like unlike some grocery stores, you'll never find rents. You're sort of like trying to insinuate that anyone who is supportive of trans people is like ignoring data or willfully shutting down some kind of like more science driven conversation, but you're not making the implicit explicit right? You're sort of like doing these big broad gestures to be like, you know how they are.

And it's like, no, you have to tell me how they are. Oh, there's then we're not going to go into it, but like there's then a whole tedious like debate thing. And this paper is eventually retracted. The reason why it's retracted is because they never got ethics approval. Oh, Jesus, always a good fucking sign. The funny thing is too is like on the kind of broader and more substantive critiques.

He's like, well, the limitations section of the paper, like said these weren't representative, which like I guess, but also you can't just publish a super shitty study and then have limitations be like, well, the study is super shitty. So after this happens, the paper is retracted. You then get another tedious wave of like someone published an article that questioned the trans orthodoxy and they were canceled.

He writes like two different first person accounts, one of which for Barry, Wice's website. You got to give me a trigger warning before you say so. I know, I know it's bad. Don't say it three times, you know. The headline is, my research on gender dysphoria was censored, but I won't be. Oh, Lord. If Rapidsance at gender dysphoria was real, you would be talking about the real evidence for it. You would be pointing us to evidence. You wouldn't be talking about like, this guy's paper was retracted.

This guy's like super junk balls paper was retracted. Well, I think part of like what's at the core of what's happening here is a thing that I thought about a lot as an organizer, which is what happens when people believe that their discomfort has to be resolved in order for other people to do other things with their own lives, right?

Like you feel uncomfortable when a conversation comes up and you're nervous about becoming the new like Larry David of your friend group, like, I don't know, you can't say anything right. And like meanwhile, people are not getting health care that they urgently need. Yeah. Like I both have a lot of empathy for folks who feel like changes happening really rapidly and I'm struggling to keep up with it. And I feel really confused by it and whatever.

That discomfort becomes the cultural thing that we're responding to instead of like the actual needs of actual trans youth, you know, but you're very clear. And like you can just ask them and find out what they are totally. Yeah, totally. So we have the one Lisa Lippen study, which is heavily corrected. We then have this Michael Bailey fuck saw study officially retracted. So these are the only two pieces of evidence for rapid onset gender dysphoria.

Okay. We also accidentally during this period get a bunch of evidence against rapid onset gender dysphoria. I'm stealing this point from Julius Arano who has pointed this out numerous times that over the last couple of years, the anti trans movement keeps just declaring victory and saying that they've discovered this like smoking gun that all of their concerns have been proven. And every single time it ends up proving the opposite.

The first one of these alleged smoking guns is a lawsuit from 2020 that's filed in the UK called have a stock versus Bell. It is filed by two claimants. The first claimant is somebody named Kira Bell who was a patient at England's only youth gender clinic, which we will talk about in great detail later. We're not going to go into too much detail, but I'm just going to read you a couple of choice excerpts from the timeline that is laid out in the kind of discovery fact stage of this loss.

So if you read the decision, these are little sentences that I'm I'm I'm cutting out because they're like amits all of the legal ease. It says when she was 15, the first claimant was referred to the tavestok clinic. That's the gender identity clinic. She was first seen at the tavestok clinic aged 16 and had a number of appointments spread out over one year and nine months.

She was referred to another clinic in June 2013 and after three appointments, commence puberty blockers after commencing testosterone at 17 changes to her body commenced rapidly. And when she was 20, she had a double mastectomy and then she detransitions a couple years later. So just to lay this out really clearly, according to the timeline presented by somebody who claims she was rushed through gender affirming care. She identifies as trans at 15.

She doesn't get her first appointment at the clinic until she's 16 because there's a huge waiting list. She then has a bunch of appointments spread out over one year and nine months before she gets puberty blockers. She then starts testosterone at 17 so another year goes by and she gets a mastectomy at 20. Yeah, five years, big rush. This also explains why in the lawsuit, they mentioned that in the previous year, the clinic only gave puberty blockers to 161 kids, which is minuscule.

We're talking about 8 million kids between 10 and 19 in the UK as a whole. And if you compare this to antidepressants, 500,000 kids in the UK are on antidepressants. And I don't want to cast aspersions on antidepressants or whatever, but it's like you can get antidepressants after one appointment. I feel like between this and your last episode saying your therapist called you a nervous wreck. Look, that you might be telling on yourself more than you mean to.

You can get this shouldn't one appointment. I don't know if you know that. I was rushed into dealing with my anxiety issues after a scan 40 years. It was very funny. He's like, yeah, you have like a sort of fast talking kind of urgent, nervous energy. Has anyone ever told you that? And I was like, about 1500 people on iTunes. You can actually see reviews of my personality. You can get a second and a third and a fourth opinion if you'd like. Only every time I talk, which I do for a living.

So, okay, so that is the first claimant. So someone who was rushed through a five year process. And then the second claimant, I'm going to send you this excerpt from the lawsuit. The second claimant, Mrs. A, is the mother of a 15 year old girl who has autism spectrum disorder. The daughter has a history of mental health and behavioral problems. She is, quote, desperate to run away from all that made her female end quote, and has been referred to child and adolescent mental health services.

Which is not the gender identity clinic, by the way. This is just like mental health for kids. Mrs. A is very concerned that her daughter would be referred to the Tabestock clinic and prescribed puberty blockers. However, the daughter has not currently been referred to the Tabestock clinic. And having regard to the defendant's current practice would not meet the criteria for puberty blockers,

because her parents would not support that treatment. Mrs. A's interest in this action is therefore largely theoretical. This is so English in the best way. That's English. Bless your heart. This is literally just a random person. Her daughter has mental health problems. Okay, we think she might be rushed into medicalization if she was referred to this clinic, but she wasn't.

Can you imagine filing a lawsuit against the saccalares and be like, well, if I was in a motorcycle accident, I would have been prescribed opioids and then I would have gotten addicted. I really like how close we're getting to calling this lawsuit stolen valor. For all the fictional people who really were rushed into treatment, this does a disservice to their sacrifice. Yeah, poor one out. Yeah, for all the made up people.

This decision in which all of these facts come out actually results in banning puberty blockers for people under 16. The case is later overturned, thankfully, but this actually results in making it much harder for people to get puberty blockers after this. Puberty blockers are something that I worked on specifically. Oh, did you? Yeah, absolutely.

And it fits in a category that almost all sort of transition related or gender affirming care fits into, which is we already provide it to cis people, but we're specifically denying it to trans people because they are trans, right? Yeah, there's this like really bizarre talking point going around about puberty blockers for trans kids. They're not reversible. We don't know if they're reversible. And like the whole point of puberty blockers is that they're reversible.

People take them when they're going through puberty too early and you take them for a couple of years and then you wait for like the appropriate age to go through puberty and you stop taking them and you go through puberty. So like if they weren't reversible, they would not be prescribed to a few thousand cisgender kids a year. Like the whole point of it is the reversibility. That's why people like them and seek them out.

Okay, so that lawsuit was the first rake stepping that the anti-transmurian has done where they're accidentally gining up more evidence against their entire narrative. The second one is the Missouri gender clinic whistleblower. I know that you as a scholar of my tweets have probably been following this very closely. Here's what comes up when I open up my fucking chrome on my computer.

Is it has a bunch of suggested like, hey, you're a place as you go often and one of them is just Michael Hobbs on Twitter. I feel like what it actually does it opens up 75 tabs, but they're all just different photos of your dog. I thought that's my phone. The iOS has a thing where you can just rotate through pictures of a person or a thing or whatever. And my phone was immediately like, you got a lot of pictures of this fucking dog.

Siri is like, look, I don't usually do this, but tone it down. Look, that's enough. So this woman who was an employee at a gender clinic in St. Louis wrote an article for Barry Wises blog called, I thought I was saving trans kids. Now I'm blowing the whistle. And this was part of a kind of a media rollout that also included a sworn affidavit that she filed with the Missouri attorney general.

And in this affidavit and in this article, she basically says that like kids were being rushed through processes. They're barely getting seen by psychologists. And yet the doctors are like, we think you're trans. Here's some hormones. But once she files this, once it goes public, people start noticing that she's making some implausible claims in this affidavit as well.

So at one point, she says that a kid comes in identifying as a communist attack helicopter. Human female, maybe non-binary and was put on hormones. And I don't know if you know this, but this thing of I'm an attack helicopter. It's like a really well known right wing meme. It's something that right wing people say to basically invalidate trans people like, oh, you identify as a woman. Well, I identify as an attack helicopter.

It's so the bumper stickers that say my truck identifies as a prehistory. Yeah, it's the one fucking joke. They only have one fucking joke, right? And so this attack helicopter thing strikes people as like, was this maybe someone who was joking or maybe this whistleblower like Reddit on a website and thought it was real or something like something weird is going on.

But then to me, the far more implausible claim that she makes in this article and in this affidavit, she says the clinic routinely issued puberty blockers or cross sex hormones without parental consent. If those kids are under 18, that's extraordinarily unlikely. If this was true, I mean, it's a very risky strategy for this.

For this clinic, right, because you're opening yourself up to litigation. And there's also the question of like insurance and kind of the administration of the American healthcare system that someone is paying for these procedures. And so the parents are getting a bill from a gender clinic for, you know, a shot of puberty blockers every three months. And they're not noticing, right? And also their kid is like visibly transitioning.

Yeah, every single person who like works in healthcare is like, I don't think so. Yeah. As usual, this is something that of course, like there's this big victory lap of like, we're finally, you're finally have to admit that like these clinics are pushing kids through. But then local reporters start looking around and saying, well, okay, this person alleges that like a ton of kids are pushed through procedures.

Well, let's find some of them. Let's go talk to people. And so a local reporter finds almost two dozen parents of kids who were seen at the clinic. And every single one of them says that they don't agree with the characterization of this whistleblower at all.

It took a long time and they were really thoroughly assessed and were happy with the procedures. And they even talked to some kind of like anti-trans parents who were like, yeah, we didn't think that our daughter was trans at all, but we don't think that she was rushed through anything. We think that they went really, really slow. And eventually she didn't get care partly because we weren't happy with it.

So it's like they just can't find anybody. And to this day, as far as I know, not a single individual named person has come forward and said, yes, this happened to me at this clinic. All we've had is numerous people come forward and say, no, this isn't my experience at all. It's really fascinating to me that not really anywhere in the sort of storytelling of this stuff does anyone go, I think this person might just be really uncomfortable with trans people.

Yeah, yeah. And as I always say, like, I'm not going to litigate what is in this person's heart. I'm not, I'm not going to speculate about their motives or what they really believe or whatever. But in her own affidavit and in this Barry White's article, she routinely misgenders kids that come to this clinic. She's crazy. Pretty really, really, really low bar. It's also just like a sign of a fucking Gremlin of a person. Dude, I know it's so easy.

If you introduce yourself to me as Michael, hi, my name's Michael. I wouldn't be like, Mikey, M dogs. What does your birth certificate say? You wouldn't do that. That's weird. You're being weird. The third rake stepping, I hadn't even heard of this one before I started researching this episode. But in March of 2023, there was something called the WPath files. So WPath is the world professional association of transgender health providers.

It's basically like the AAP or the endocrine society or whatever for like trans medical providers. And basically, I'm not going to go through the whole fucking 300 page document. But the introduction basically presents it as like we have leaked documents from inside WPath, where they're admitting that they're Russian kids through these procedures. The only problem is, first of all, these are not internal WPath chats. This is not a private forum.

So our friend Evan Irkhardt has like looked into this in more detail and found that like this is a professional forum where anybody can pay $225. And like participate in it. It's like a moderated forum for like health professionals. Oh no, it's your voters pamphlet where you're like look man for 800 bucks. Anybody can put a statement in here.

And then the other, the other significantly larger problem is that if you actually read the evidence, like the leaked evidence of a mass, it again proves the opposite of what they're saying. So if you get to the actual leaks, like the actual text parts where they're like, we got it. This is it. The first example of this is a doctor in Brazil posts on the forums, kind of like a Reddit thing. He's like posting a question.

He says, look, I've got a patient who identifies as trans and they're 14 years old and they want general surgery. What should I do? One of the replies is a doctor who says, I wouldn't do it. Tissue to immature dilation routine to critical. Okay, so don't do it. Another person posts, we at GS Montreal would not undertake a surgery at 14. General surgery is delayed until the patient is 18.

Okay. Then there's another post, which is like much longer and more detailed, where it's somebody saying, look in my entire like 30 year career as a gender affirming care practitioner. I've only done maybe like four or six general surgeries on people under 18 and they were like very specific circumstances.

These were basically kids who wanted the surgery before they went off to college and they wanted it to be in the summer so they could have like the recovery time and kind of start fresh in college. But like that's something that's done with like a tremendous amount of care and that's not something that we do lightly and like I wouldn't recommend doing this unless you like really know the patient and like definitely don't do it at 14.

So someone asked, can I do a surgery on a young kid and everyone was like, no. And they just present this as if like, well, we've proven they're getting surgery on kids. We got them folks. I know that we have statistics about how many people under 18 get general surgeries and it's like so close to zero, you might as well fucking round it down to zero. It's like, basically people are not getting these procedures under 18. So Michael, I'm so tired.

Dude, it's exhausting, right? And again, you get this fucking victory lap. It just sucks to see all the shit playing out and be like, okay, cool. So this is going to be, you know, the fabulously wealthy trans community is going to be fucking spending their money. Yeah, no kidding. And all they're fucking advocacy time beating back this fucking bullshit. It's also so frustrating to do this like pretty recently after we just did this with the gay marriage debate. Fucking honestly.

It's like, do you really need a trans cousin? Really? We have to start from scratch with this. It's really sad and frustrating and demoralizing and the people who are doing it really think that they are bringing up reasonable and good points. And they're forcing us to make a series of tedious podcast episodes, talking about fucking methodology again. Yeah, Michael's being forced constantly. I'm not doing this to win internet beefs, Aubrey. I'm doing this for science.

But then the thing is that, I mean, this is the really dark part of the episode. So please bear with me. The really sad thing about this is that despite all of this just years long rake stepping, this strategy is working. Yeah. So over the last couple of years, we've seen an unprecedented legislative assault on trans people. Yeah. 21 states have banned trans kids in sports. 11 states have banned LGBT content in schools.

Six states have banned trans people using the bathroom. They want to use Florida just banned gender identity cards. So like, if you want to change your driver's license, so it says female, they're not letting you do that anymore, which is like just an unbelievable dick move. It's just so shitty. There's nine states now are legislating pronoun use and are making it illegal for teachers to use kids preferred pronouns if it doesn't match their birth certificate. Jesus, God almighty.

Do you want to hear that do you want to hear the galaxy brain justification for these? No, God. So what is it, Michael? You say no, but I'm just going to keep going regardless. I was just waiting just to form out to hear. I understand. I'm asking the concept on this show is fake. Look, I'm going, all right? Let me proceed. You're like those little wind up chattering teeth once he starts. There's no, you just kind of let him fall off that to the table or just run out of teeth or whatever.

So the justification for banning social transition is that most kids who socially transition go on to puberty blockers and most kids who go on puberty blockers go into hormones, but that's an argument that most of the people who socially transition are trans. And they're actually pretty firm in their identity relatively young, they know young, but somehow transphobes have galaxy brained themselves into this idea that this is like putting them on a medical pathway.

And this is like bewitching them and like keeping them trans against their wishes and this weird inversion, this like Darvo nonsense, where it's like, well, there's stigma against detransitioning. What? You have to actually make sure that they feel comfortable detransitioning as if parents who are like, we affirm your trans identity, but when they say, Mommy, I'm cis, they'll be like, fuck you. That's why so many cis kids are homeless. It's like, what the fuck are we talking about?

Darvo is such a good analogy for what's happening here. For folks who are unfamiliar, Darvo deny attack reverse victim and offender, yes. The thing is, I didn't actually know that I just have a friend named Darvo and she sucks. It's a lady named Darvo. The doctor was a woman, you know. Stop making me giggle during dark shit. Do you understand my job?

But like, I think Darvo is such a good example because honestly, like, part of what people are so like whipped up about right now is children, their parents and their health care provider making decisions about what kind of health care they ought to access and when. Yeah, right. Like, it is such a deep Darvo shit that you're like, sorry, like a kid in, I don't know where Modesto, California got some health care that they wanted and you're this been out of shape about it.

So we're also, of course, seeing this wave of bands on gender, affirming care. And like, it really is hard to convey, like, how serious these laws are. So this is from a New York Times article. Last month, Florida joined at least four other states that make providing gender, affirming care, a felony. Florida's law penalizes doctors who violate the law with up to five years in prison. Jesus fucking hell, dude.

It also changes child custody rules to treat transition care as equivalent to child abuse. Yikes. The, this rapid onset gender dysphoria narrative is central to the passage of these laws in Florida. They have like a long kind of briefing, like allegedly, studious document that goes along with the law where they're kind of laying out the evidence base, which refers to Lisa Littman's papers numerous times. In Georgia, a congressman reads Lisa Littman's study into the record. Jesus fucking Christ.

They also got obsessed with this like evidence brief frequently asked questions thing that was submitted to the Utah legislature that has numerous explicit references to rapid onset gender dysphoria. And also includes a bunch of testimonials from D transitioners. The first one is by somebody named Ashira. And she says, I was about 17 when I heard the word for transgender.

And then the last thing I did was Google gender therapist in Calgary. And that was how that happened. After like three sessions, I got my permissions, Lippur, whatever for transitioning medically for hormones. And so I started in 2013 on testosterone. And it wasn't until 2015 or 2016 actually that I had any surgery.

And then the link to it is a link to YouTube. And if you watched like just a little bit longer after this, the person interviewing her is like, oh, so how old were you when you transition? So 23 or 24 fully illegal adults. They also have somebody who in the document, it says, Billy Burley took cross sex hormones and getting surgeries to change his outward appearance after a difficult childhood and being sexually assaulted by his swim coach.

He did his best to live as a woman, but ultimately the truth of his biology one out. So I followed the link, which goes to a sort of like a born again ministry website.

He's kind of a little bit vague on the details, but he's like, I never felt comfortable in my body. And then in college, I fell in love with someone. And then I was denying it. And after five or six years in a failed marriage, I finally decided to transition. And I'm like, I don't, I don't think all this happened before he was 18. Guys, we have other policy interventions. It's someone before 18. It has a six year failed marriage.

It appears to be in his 30s or his late 20s that he transitioned. Boy, boy, the thing that I really want to stress here, and I know I do this on the show all the time, is that this is not normal. Right, both of us have worked in kind of development and NGO charity world. And like, if you're talking about a real social problem, you should be able to point to instances of it that everyone agrees, our examples.

If I say that like school shootings are a problem in America, if I talk about you, you've all Texas, the most hardcore far right gun that will be like, yep, that's a school. If we're going to talk about kids being rushed into transition, it's like, sorry, your examples need to have kids. And they need to have rushing. It's really fucking suspicious that you cannot provide straight forward examples of your own claims.

That is not what we see from like real movements that are seeking to, you know, safeguard women or like whatever they say they're trying to do protect children. That's something we see from anti-vaxxers. I also just want folks to like flash forward in their brains. Dear cis listeners, come along with me on a journey. Sistiners. Sistiners.

Do you think that 50 years from now people will be going, hey, remember that chapter when we thought some people were transgender and we were all totally wrong? Yeah, a mass psychosis. What do you think we're going to be going, hey, look at this additional chapter in the horror show of American history where we once again decided to scapegoat a group of people who already had very little.

Yeah, even if you don't give a shit about trans people, give a shit about you saving face in a couple decades. I love that you're like, we're taking names. I just want your help. The LGBT community sees you and we have an Excel spreadsheet. Okay, reverse Santa. He keeps the naughty and nice lips. Yeah, good.

So these were all of the alleged smoking guns that the anti-trans movement has pointed to as like irrefutable proof that kids are being rushed into surgeries and hormones, all of which turned out not to be proof of that and evidence of, in fact, the opposite. The final crescendo, the biggest smoking gun and the greatest example of this happening is something that happened last month. This is this is very recent history in April of 2024.

The United Kingdom published something called the cast review. So what do you know about the cast report already? First of all, I want to say how I feel about the cast report, which is, oh God, I forgot you have your fucking soundboard next to you. I found my slide whistle. I hate it. So here's the situation.

What I know about the cast report is a person who does not treat trans people and does not have expertise in gender-affirming healthcare or like related fields, like did an audit of the NHS's gender clinic. And found a bunch of wild things or like made a bunch of claims that have led to a dramatic reduction of the NHS, gender-affirming care, yes? Wait, say the thing about her qualifications one more time, but sound meaner. Sound like really like put your put your throat into it.

What? Do it do it? Are you trying to force me to reply, guy? No, no, do it, do it, do it, just just just make the voice thing. Look, all I know is that this lady has no qualifications for treating trans people. Who also has a soundboard on their phone? You know how I feel about that, Mike? You can do it. I started laughing. That's how I feel about that one. That's good. You were so hesitant to do the voice. You're like, I don't know if she's good. I don't know what's happening here.

I wanted to say, say it as if you know a rap air horn is coming. That would reveal the whole thing. Is that an app on your phone? Yes, it is. It's in Siri when Siri suggests app. It's like most opened. Michael, on this show we value sound effects, which is why I say, Oh yeah, I know. I knew you escalated. I knew you'd take it there. Again, we are giggling about some of the darkest social forces in the world. Giggle about dark shit.

Basically, the cast review is the entire reason I wanted to do this series of episodes because over the course of the last decade, effectively every institution in Britain has been captured by this anti-trans movement. It's like allegedly polite anti-trans movement, especially led by parents, but the same kinds of messages that we start to see on those forums in 2016 are showing up on the BBC. They're showing up in politics, both the Tories and the Labour Party are echoing this stuff.

We see it in the courts, right, that blocked puberty blockers after this case that was not somebody getting Russian to care, right? Yeah. And so this report is yet another, I think, very obvious example of somebody looking around for any excuse to invalidate this kind of care and to completely ignore the underlying fact as they do it. The number one thing to know is that the cast report does not provide any new information with one exception.

The vast majority of the report is basically like, it's a review. They're putting together all of the existing data they've commissioned these reviews from the University of York, and it's kind of supposed to be like a factual overview of like, what does the data say? What do the records say, etc.? The only piece of new information contained in this report is an audit of England and Wales only gender clinic.

So again, we're looking at the question of whether or not kids are being rushed into care, right? And so we have the medical records of every single person who was seen by this gender clinic between 2018 and 2023. I just want to go, this is going to be boring, but I just want to go through it because it's really important to like stay grounded in reality, which like everyone else seems to refuse to do. I love this as a statement from a podcast host. This is going to be boring, but I know.

I'll do the rap air horn at like 10 second intervals to keep you awake. Yeah, fuck off. So they did this audit. So as a starting point between 2018 and 2023, this clinic only saw 3,306 patients. So that 661 patients per year over the course of five years, only 892 kids were referred to endocrinology. So 178 kids per year were even eligible to get puberty blockers or hormones. 73% of the people who were seen by this clinic got nothing.

So just as a starting point, right, only 178 kids were referred to endocrinology of the kids who were referred to endocrinology. Only 145 kids per year got puberty blockers. 97 kids per year got puberty blockers and hormones. So these are minuscule numbers. Which isn't like good news that not a lot of people are getting care. Yeah, exactly. But it is evidence that that sort of inundation just isn't really happening.

Yes. And if it was that the sort of filter function that is built in is doing a pretty rigorous job. I mean, speaking of filtering function, the audit also includes numbers on how many appointments the kids had before they were referred to puberty blockers and hormones. The average kid had 6.7 appointments before a referral. And then the report also notes that the average total appointments is 10 before this court decision. And then after the court decision made it harder, 14 appointments.

So even after they're referred to endocrinology, they then have another couple of appointments of gatekeeping. I mean, I think this is again where like anti-trans rhetoric really reveals itself, right? Which is like, there is not an amount of gatekeeping that makes people feel comfortable. Yes. The last thing that this audit found is that fewer than 10 kids detransitioned during these five years.

So the anti-trans brain trust loves pointing out they're like, well, they might have aged into the adult clinics and then they later detransitioned, which fair enough like we don't have perfect data on this. But a lot of these kids were getting puberty blockers and hormones at 15. And so what this means is that over the course of the following three years, fewer than 10 of them detransitioned. I mean, 3,300 kids.

If we were seeing a mass wave of detransitioners, we would see some sign of that from kids who were getting hormones at 15. But then to me, the best sign that this is a moral panic document that is the output of a year's long moral panic that is taken over all these institutions in the UK is that these are these central findings of this cast report. To me, this should be like the beginning of the report.

There were concerns that kids were being rushed into care. Like, hey, we looked into it. There's really no cause for concern. This audit, all of the data that I have just given you, this is appendix eight. Oh, no, come on of the cast report. All of the rest of it is just filibustering. Is there any point in this report where they talk about like the issues that trans kids face that could be remedied by health care?

Dude, no. There's a whole thing about like context. But at no point, does it mention like the rise of transphobia in the United Kingdom? The word transphobia only appears three times in the entire document. Jesus, hell, we will find out more about the process by which this came about. And I'm very confident that it will look extremely bad, but also just the text, the straightforward text of the document is just a series of anti trans talking points. Boy, oh boy, oh boy.

This is from the introduction to the report written by Dr. Hillary Cass herself. We have to start from the understanding that this group of children and young people are just that. Children and young people first and foremost, not individuals solely defined by their gender in congruence or gender related distress. They're not defined by it.

We have to cut through the noise and polarization to recognize that they need the same standards of high quality care to meet their needs as any other child or young person. When you talk to these young people and their parents, they want the same things as everyone else. The chance to be heard, respected, and believed to have their questions answered and to access help and advice.

It is only when they have been on very long waiting lists and sideline from usual care and local services that they are forced to do their own research and may come to a single medical answer to their problems. They are forced to do their own research and may come to a single medical answer to their problems. This is like a slightly more grounded sounding version of the ROGD stuff in general. Hey guys, let's empathize with these kids. And then from there, we can understand how wrong they are.

Essentially, the only evidence for Rapidouncet gender dysphoria at this point is the fact that there were more referrals to gender clinics. Like starting in 2014, referrals went up very rapidly. Personally, I think this is just very easily explained by the fact that trans people are more visible in society and are less stigmatized than they used to be. I don't see that as a particularly big mystery, but just over and over again, this is another anti-trans talking point.

Over and over again, people just say like, well, that can't explain it. So in the report, it says, although it is certainly the case that there's much greater acceptance of trans identities, particularly among generation C, and this may account for some of the increase in numbers, this is not an adequate explanation for the overall phenomenon. Why? Yeah, there's no citation given for that.

And then it says, the exponential increase in numbers within a five year time frame is very much faster than would be expected for the normal evolution of acceptance of a minority group. So our friend, the health nerd, Gideon, he did a whole post about whether or not this is really exponential, but it's to me, the fact that referrals went from roughly 700 to roughly 2500.

Like if you look at it on a relative scale, it kind of looks like who they tripled in a couple years, but it's also just a very small number of kids. Yeah. The fact that we have 1800 extra kids getting referrals over the course of five years is not that weird. And then the other thing that it doesn't mention is that the numbers have leveled off. So since 2018, even before the pandemic, the numbers basically flatlined around 2500.

There's some data that sort of makes it look like it's spiking, but then the footnotes of the report say that this is likely a duplicate. So it kind of looks like it's doubling yet again, but it appears that that's like that's falsely counted. So it's plateaued. So again, if we're talking about social contagion, right, the way that a virus spreads, it would continue going up.

Yeah. So the other component that we saw in these parental accounts was this idea that like they're being influenced by their peers and online. Sure. The internet did it. The computer. Again, you're going to love this language. I'm sending you an excerpt.

Gender questioning young people and their parents have spoken to the review about online information that describes normal adolescent discomfort as a possible sign of being trans. And that particular influencers have had a substantial impact on their child's beliefs and understanding of their gender. This is the precise sewage that we saw in the Littling study, right?

Kids are having normal teenage issues. And because of the internet, they think that that means they're trans. I've never wanted an air horn app on my phone more. I will send it to you. Here influence during this stage of life is very powerful. As well as the influence of social media, the review has heard accounts of female students forming intense friendships with other gender questioning or transgender students at school and then identifying as trans themselves.

This is someone who doesn't understand what the coming out process is. Yes, they're turning the frogs gay, but the frogs are teenagers. Teenage social groups. This is like totally fucking anecdotal, everything. But that could just as easily be trans students seeking out other trans students because they have a sense that they're kind on the same page in some important way. This is like all the fucking gay kids at your school. I know after high school. And you're like, yeah, no shit.

We can't go into every single one of these, but I was putting these paragraphs in categories. And one of my biggest categories was just like general jankiness. So in this section, it says clinicians and parents reported that gay students are still being stigmatized and bullied in school. And there's sometimes a perception that there is less validation for them than for trans pupils. What? Are we doing this shit again?

This is another bizarre fucking conspiracy theory that trans folks always trot out that gay kids are saying that they're trans because it's easier to be a trans person than a gay person. Which is also wild because in our continuing like journey into the way back machine, a very standard response to queer people coming out in the 90s was like, so you think you're a woman or so you think you're a man? Yeah. You're just finding reasons not to listen to us.

And I wish that you could just get right with that is what's happening within you, right? Yeah. Because it's like real clear from the outside that like most transphobes and homophobes don't really deeply know the difference between those two identities. There's also this is also the part where the misogyny at the heart of this also comes out. There's something very weird how this whole movement says that it's like we're out to protect girls, right?

Like fairness in women sports and all this kind of stuff. The only other piece of evidence for rapidons that gender dysphoria is there's more kids come into the clinics and most of those people are assigned female at birth. That's like the only other piece of evidence that they can point to and this report has so much stuff about how like girls are mentally unstable.

It says purity is an intense period of rapid change and can be a difficult process where young people are vulnerable to mental health problems, particularly girls. Girls reported more hours of social media use than boys 43% of girls use social media for three or more hours per day compared to 22% of boys. Girls were more likely to have low self esteem to have body weight dissatisfaction to be unhappy with their appearance.

Girls were more likely to report fewer hours of sleep than boys and to report experiencing disrupted sleep more often or most of the time. Again, it's not really saying what it means, but it's like, yeah, girls are like so, I guess like sleep deprived and mentally ill that they all think they're trans. Girls were more likely to be diagnosed with neurosthenia and hysteria. Girls were more likely to report a menacing figure hidden in the yellow wallpaper of the room where they're confined.

What are we doing? I'm hitting my desk. This is another thing that I just don't find all that mysterious. I think the super basic fact is that young girls are kind of allowed to experiment with gender presentation in a way that young boys typically aren't.

And so I think what's happening is that if you're trans and you're assigned female at birth, your parents are going to kind of let you experiment and maybe let you wear boys clothes, whereas if you're assigned male at birth, and you're like, oh, I want to wear mom's dress or something, or I want to grow my hair long, parents are going to be like, fuck, no, you don't. Most like school dress codes are school uniform codes allow for girls to wear pants, but do not allow for boys to wear skirt.

And in terms of like the repercussions, right, if you are a person who has attended a trans day, remember its event, you've heard the reading of the names, you have maybe seen photos of people who passed, those are overwhelmingly trans women and they're overwhelmingly trans women of color. Yeah, there's just a lot of garbage like I think it's also important though to mention that it's not just trans kids that have it really tough. It's also really tough for their transphobic parents.

Oh, good. So this is our next excerpt. The review heard concerns from many parents about their child being socially transitioned and affirmed in their expressed gender without parental involvement. I love being socially transitioned. They've been, they've been transitioned. This was predominantly where an adolescent had quote unquote come out at school, quote unquote, but expressed concern about how their parents might react.

This set up an adversarial position between parent and child where some parents felt quote unquote forced to affirm their child's assumed identity or risk being painted as transphobic and or unsupportive. Again, we have this thing where it's like they're going to be called unsupportive just because they don't support their kids. Yep. Wow, I didn't think we were resorting to names calling, but I guess we are. They're going to call me short just because I'm five foot six.

Some parents who spoke to the review felt that social transition was of more benefit to their child in terms of its social impact than in helping to manage their gender in congruence. They describe how their children were previously isolated and bullied, but their status amongst peers has improved as a result of quote unquote coming out. This is like straight from transphobic websites.

Oh, when pro gay parents get together, they get to be pee flag and when anti gay parents get together were suddenly bigots. Oh, so it's okay to be nice to kids, but as soon as you're mean, it's not quite you mean. Really? Interesting. Hypocrisy much. I don't know. I just find this whole thing like so sad.

And also, I mean, the saddest thing, of course, is this document is an extremely obvious and relatively explicit call to put more barriers in front of kids who identify as trans. It has this kind of like this, this proposed restructuring of the NHS to basically put more roadblocks in place so that when kids identify as trans instead of getting referred directly to the gender identity service.

They have to go through like psychologists and people who aren't trained in gender dysphoria to make sure to rule out all of these other things and to basically make transition a last resort. So kids are already again, 10 to 14 appointments before they get onto puberty blockers. That's so long. That's so long.

They've already just banned puberty blockers in the UK. And because puberty blockers are considered to be a necessary precursor to getting other forms of gender affirming care, this basically results in a ban on gender affirming care as such. A ban on care for youth, right? Yeah, although there's also plenty of kind of coded stuff in this report about the need for like more responsive services for people 17 to 25. Yeah, great.

I mean, people are going to yell at me for saying this, but this is the very explicit project of this this entire review. Like if you actually read it and you engage with what it's saying at every turn, it's saying we need to we need to consider all the options before transition. We need to maybe consider slowing down, right? Recommendation number two in the report is that hormones should be used with extreme caution.

Well, all fucking evidence is that they are 97 kids a year and the entire fucking England and Wales are getting hormones. I would call that extreme caution. Yeah, what would extreme caution look like if not that? But again, they're winning and it appears the NHS is going to be restructured around this like quote unquote new model that is just going to make it even harder to get a form of care. There's already extremely hard. That's the output of all of this, right?

That's the legacy of the rapid onset gender dysphoria narrative is no evidence and a huge what appears to be global at this point, which is a very good evidence that it helps and no evidence that harms anybody. You need a different soundboard. Where's your soundboard? You need a groning soundboard. Yeah, I need a custom. I need a bespoke soundboard. An Aubrey Grunt machine.

If we were going to make it like a taxonomy of maintenance phase episodes, one of them would be the like there's a kernel of truth here, but it's gotten blown out of proportion and people think it's universal. Or there'd be another one that's like the studies were much more nuanced, but the PR really blew it out of proportion. Yeah. The it's fully made up and originated on the internet category of our shows is one of the smallest categories. It's like brags and this. Yeah, yeah.

Like that is really telling and makes me again profoundly upset. I was ready for you to use the voice. I mean, I have my thumb on that for like six minutes. Give me the voice woman. You You You You You You