Why would The Science ever need a pardon?

up charges. I haven't seen any evidence to confirm that he was actually guilty of what they claimed he was, but he there was reports that he was in fact seeking a pardon from President Trump during his first term to get them to back off. So I'm not saying that everybody that received a pardon from Joe Biden yesterday is in fact guilty. Let me just make that clear. I will say this, though, I think the vast majority of them are incredibly guilty of incredible crimes. And this

is not just me guessing here. This is not me just saying, oh, I don't like the Democrats and therefore they're all guilty, which is essentially what everyone was doing. When it came to Trump and his family. They're just saying, well, why would he pardon his kids? Of course they must

be guilty of treason. In reality, they had been getting persecuted by an incredibly corrupt criminal justice system, and they definitely needed the pardon so that they could actually live their lives and function because I don't think there's any evidence, Like whatever you feel about Donald Trump, I don' think there's any evidence that his kids have done anything illegal,

but they were still dealing with lawfare. The difference being I can actually prove it, or at least come really close to proving it.

and funding, That's my opinion. And they overthrew Yanokovich, the president of Ukraine at the time, who was elected, who had agreed to early elections, and they just said, Nope, not going to do that. Then a few months later, Hunter Biden gets signed to the board of Barisma. The biolabs that exist in Ukraine, according to Victoria Neulin, when she was under I guess cross examination from Marco Rubio, she acknowledges that these biolabs do indeed exist.

back to January first or twenty fourteen. It's not just an accident, it's not just trying to prevent lawfare. Now, this is a very specific timeline that was utilized for his entire family for a very good reason, because, in my opinion, again, can't prove all of this, even though I've already demonstrated there's a lot of evidence and a lot of smoke to justify my thesis that there is in fact a fire, that there was an operation being

ran in Ukraine. In terms of Hunter Biden being what I believe was the bagman for either the US State Department, the DoD, the CIA. I don't know who you can guess on what I think. I think you guys can guess who I think was responsible, because I don't think you get away with this unless you're at the tippy tippy top, and for the record, I don't think the President of United States is at the tippy tippy top.

So I believe that he was the bagman. That Joe Biden was also as Vice President United States under Barack Obama, he was the head envoy in Ukraine. That none of this is accidental, that the pardons that were issued to this date were not accidental, that they are extraordinarily specific for a very good reason. And I think they made a no oops. I think they should have made it

a twenty year pardon. But I think they realized that a ten year pardon, which is what these were over ten years, was already so absurd that they just couldn't go any further. But they had to encompass these dates, and therefore they did so. Yeah, Anthony Fauci received a pardon Hunter Biden, all of his basically Joe's entire family. Okay, in the in the waning hours this was this literally

occurs while Donald Trump is being inaugurated. There's no time left, zero second, zero minutes left on the clock, and Joe Biden is quietly filing pardon paperwork for everyone in his crime syndicate, and I'm calling it a crime syndicate because I believe there's enough evidence to say that, and I also believe that the pardons demonstrate that I'm not wrong that you don't do that, especially not to January first,

twenty fourteen, unless there's a specific reason. I think that's the reason, and I think that we've been ruled by an incredibly, incredibly criminal organization at least for the last four years, and probably for our entire lives, but definitely for the.

tested in court. I don't know if it's actually going to play out this way, but this is what a lot of people are reporting that because they already have a pardon, they cannot incriminate themselves. They have a blanket parton. Whatever they did is fine according to Joe Biden. So when you plead the fifth, you're saying, I don't want to self incriminate, so therefore I'm not going to speak. Well, you can't be incriminated because you have a pardon. Therefore

you have to tell the truth. And if you don't tell the truth, well then you're perjuring yourself. That is a crime. Then you go to jail. So that is the thesis by which there may still be investigations.

Let's have the strings and pin board action to see who directed what, who was actually who were they doing this at the behest of which organizations which through their agencies We need to know all that our lives were thrown into complete disarray. Effective twenty twenty. Why why did this happen. What was the end goal? I have my own g I think that, I mean, we've gone through this so many times, so I'm going to keep it very brief, but I think they wanted to test our compliance,

that's clearly, and then we failed that. By the way, they wanted to bolster corporations and their profit margins, and they did an incredible job at that, closing down so many small businesses across the entire country, across the world. Those are two things I think they wanted to push through technology. When it came to science that was experimental, exploratory, they wanted to test it on a lot of people, and they did so. I think those are like the

three avenues. And then I think that there's the distinct possibility that we're dealing with essentially hybrid warfare, that we don't really understand the nature of this entire operation, that in fact, we could already be in a war with China. That's a possibility we could be allied with China in a war against other people. We could have agency that aren't we could have groups that aren't even government agencies that are participating in this conquering, you know, kind of

the world economic forum, corporate overlord, banking establishment. I don't know. I don't know if they're if they're pulling the strings. There's more questions and answers, unfortunately, but I think we do know enough at this point to know that what we went through was a monstrous, psychological operation.

including essentially or nearly all of the J sixers. The comparison isn't apt.

agree with that. When you're pardoning your family to keep you safe from investigations that would demonstrate your depravity, criminality, and likely treason, well then I have a much bigger problem with your utilization of pardons. I also have a big problem when it is a blanket pardon that has no explanation. You're not detailing what crimes that these people are, you know, participated in that therefore they shouldn't be prosecuted for.

Like if you're partning someone who's already in jail or facing prosecution, well we know what they're being charged with, so we know what you're pardoning them for. Donald Trump was saying the j six people, they paid enough price. They many of them spent two, three, four years in solitary confinement. No matter what you did on that date, no one was killed aside from Ashley Bebvett and a

handful of other ladies. Rosem Boiling and I think there was like three or four of the protesters that were killed. But in terms of the cops and the politicians, nobody was. So at what point do you say, well, this is just cruel and unusual punishment, Like I think it's a fair argument that it is beyond that threshold already. Did anybody do anything that justifies more than four years in prison?

And if they did, is it dramatically or can we just say, well, given that these prosecutions were so politicized, we're just.

and prosecuted to not face jail time. So once you do that, it's basically it spoils the entire thing, right, poisons the well, like the well is so poisonous at this point that I think everybody justifiably ought to be released. I don't think anybody did anything there that justified more than a four year solitary confinement sentence. And your behavior in the prosecution of these people was so unjust and

in my opinion, criminal, that therefore we're done. All of these partons from Donald Trump were just shout out to my buddy, Adam the podium guy got his podium back behind me. Actually, I'm thrilled. I'm thrilled that their horrific journey has ended here, that they get to move on with their lives and not be felons, and you know, actually just get back to life. I think that a lot of the people there that day were there for

good reasons. That they were not there to overthrow the government, and they were not there to be violent or hurt police. They were there because they believed things strongly. And I still don't know if I can talk about what they believe, so I'll just leave it at that. I think that they've paid more than enough price, and I think many of them didn't deserve to pay a price whatsoever. In fact, the vast majority of them. So I think that this

was a fantastic winning movement maneuver by Donald Trump. Also, when you contrast it with the riots of the Summer of Love and the lack of prosecution when it came to so many of those people, not to say that all of them weren't prosecuted, but many of them were not. It's just so obvious that anyone who's an impartial observer would just say, well, this is clearly politicized. We had, literally just a few months prior to j six, you have the entire nation ablaze, and so many of those

people walk Scott free. You have Kamala Harris and the others in the Democratic cabal that are putting together fundraising efforts to try and free these people, while simultaneously then turning around and pointing at these JA sixers and saying put them away forever they tried to overthrow the government, for God's sakes. I mean, it was just the contrast really highlights how unjust all of that was. And I'm glad to see it end. I really am. And I

hope that Donald Trump. There are reports right now, By the way, there are reports right now. Last night, the chair of the Libertarian Party, Engel Carl, confirmed that she has insider from the White House that the pardon for Ross Albricht will happen in the next twenty four hours. She thought it was going to happen this morning. It has not yet. It appears that it will happen this evening. This is the New York Post reporting this, so I

think it's getting more and more official. My guess is that Ross will be pardoned probably by tomorrow and home with his family by this weekend. That'll be fantastic news. I hope. I hope, and not because I want to then go Oh look, Donald Trump promised us something and he actually delivered. Like, this is about freeing a human being.

Fraeing a human being. That even if you believe, which many people do, and I understand, there is some evidence to say that, like maybe he was actually responsible for some really bad stuff with the Silk Road, not setting aside the drug charges, which I don't shouldn't be illegal. But even if he is responsible, he didn't kill anybody. He didn't, that's a fact. No one even claims that he did. And he's already spent a lean years in prison. So do we believe in second chances or not? He

had no criminal charges prior to that. It's obvious that they threw the book at him because they wanted to go after the bitcoin community, and they wanted to go after decentralized exchange and the dark web and all that, and they made an example of him. Two life sentences plus forty years. I think it was plus forty without the possibility of parole. That is Eighth Amendment violation, cruel and unusual punishment. He deserves to be free, He deserves

a second chance. I don't care what you think about the case. It's over a decade. Come on, let's get real. He doesn't deserve more than a decade. So God willing, that'll happen. And Lynn Albricht, who I've had on my show, I hope that you have the best day of your life in the next seventy two hours, and I hope you have an incredible remainder of your life after spending a decade fighting for your son to be free. It has filled me with inspiration to see what you've done.

And I hope that you get what you deserve, which is your boy beack. God willing.

within your discord, eh, within your friend group, whatever. You can have whatever discussion you want. But if it's an outsider who's here telling us how to do business, that's not in the game.

and I think he makes some really compelling points. Now I'm not saying that particular segment was the compelling point, but I think that he makes very interesting points about nationalism, Americanism, what it means to be an American. Basically, he's calling the vake and he has I mean, he's saying it more or less explicitly that Avec is an outsider, the vake. You may perceive him to be an outsider because he's higher echelon of income.

the United States in America. He's an American citizen. Yes, his parents are first generation immigrants from India. If we are now to the point, and I think this is kind of a natural pendulum swing that people went from I don't mind limited immigration to now anybody that doesn't even look like me isn't an American. I think is really dangerous but highly predictable. And I've talked about this

in prior episodes. When it comes to the phenomenon of Nick Fuentes and the hard line you know, nationalists and alt right movements, that they exist. They're definitely real. I don't think that they're as significant as the media would have you believe it, but they are definitely real, and the sentiment is growing. And I think that the reason the sentiment is growing is that no one is actually dealing with them in a reasonable fashion. They're not hearing

them out, they're not actually contending with their arguments. They're just saying bad, this is bad that's really all they have to say. They just call you racist or whatever, and then they move on. But there are arguments to be made that, like, when it comes to national identity, is that a thing? And is it a thing worth defending? In that same video, later on, Sam Hide is talking about Japan and he's saying, you know, I'm praying for Japan.

I hope that they can maintain their national identity as being Japanese. Is that racist? Well from most you know, I think an impartial observer would say, no, it isn't. It's to say that Japan ought to be Japanese and that's okay. It's okay to say that. It's okay to feel that way. I don't think it's racist to feel that way at all. And certainly he's not then demonstrating some sort of you know, identitarian superiority, saying I don't care what happens to them because they're lesser than me.

You know, that would be a true like white supremacist mentality. So I don't think Sam Hyde has that. I think what he does have, though, is a strong sense of nationalistic pride. And then it comes down to what do you perceive to be the nation? What are the values that make it a nation? And Sam would just call me gay and say, we're not having this debate. Why you're using paragraphs when you can just call me a slur.

I understand that, Sam, I respect that. However, for those that are interested in the thought experiment, I think it is worth considering. I think it is worth exploring. What is it to be an American? Is it just being born here? Can you immigrate here and just be an American instantaneously? Well depends on the laws at the time.

I guess technically you could be. But in my view, what makes America special is a belief in essentially the Bill of Rights the values that it encompassed and cemented for human beings, not just in America, but really more broadly across the world. At least that was the concept. However, I think that the framework was only really applicable to people in America, and it certainly will only be held onto by a people that value it. And I think

that's the key. I think that is actually the key to make to what makes you an American or un American person? Is that do you want to maintain the values that made America special? And from my vantage, point. What made America special was not it just being white. I know that's very unpopular amongst the alt writers, but I don't care because I don't think it's accurate to describe America as only having been special because it was

white people that came here. I think what made America continuously special and improving upon itself was that we continued to allow for immigration from all over the world of the best and brightest, and the most adventuresome and the most courageous and entrepreneurial to come here and add their spirit to the American endeavor, the American endeavor being one of, in my opinion, the height of really human existence, experience growth.

This is why I love America so much, is that I believe that those values are so uniquely special and they are not cherished by the rest of the world. Which is why I've become more nationalistic in my later years, is that I've realized that we are not only are these values very special, but they are fleeting. That we are losing them. And I think that it's a fair concern to say, are we losing them because of so

much immigration in such a short period of time. Well, I don't think it's that simple, but I think it plays a part. But I would also add I think we're losing it because our kids are being indoctrinated and propagandized through this public schooling system and then academia for the cherry on the top of the Sunday where they just tell them everything that makes America special is actually what makes America evil. So that's a big problem. And

we're talking millions of kids. I don't know how many millions, but it's at least a million kids graduating from college every year, A big, big percentage of them come out with that ideology that is super dangerous. You pair with that tens of millions of illegal immigrants over the past four years. At least eleven million is according to the federal government. I think it's far higher personally. So you add those numbers up and you're talking three four five

percent of the nation in a four year period. That's a dramatic change that I don't think that we can acclimate to. And I think what you're witnessing is that the fact that I'm right, sorry, open borders libertarians, I'm right that we're not acclimating to it because it's too rapid. You are now seeing extraordinary racist, nativistic perspectives when it comes to this entire paradigm. They're just saying, fuck you and fuck this, and I'm done and I'm not concerned

with whatever labels you put on me. I'm pissed and I'm ready to fight. That's what they're telling you. You can listen to them or you can ignore them, but they're not going to stop saying it, and they're certainly not going to stop believing it. So I've decided to listen to them. I don't necessarily agree with all their conclusions. I don't, in fact, but I do understand the concern and I think that it'll benefit us if we have an adult conversation about the pace at which the face

of this country is changing. And again, let me remind you, this is a very pluralistic civilization. There is already I think it's only fifty five or sixty percent of the country that's white. You have every other color, creed, race, you know, religion under the sun that exists and coexists in America. That is very unique. That is not a thing that happens in the rest of the world. So unless you want to just assume that We're going to be successful no matter how fast you allow for more

and more immigrants to come into this country. I am not convinced that you're right at all. In fact, I'm totally convinced at this point that you're wrong. That it will be our undoing And if we could remedy the issues that come from academia, perhaps the immigration issue wouldn't

be such a huge, huge problem. But honestly, if it weren't for what's happening in academia, I don't think we would have a governmental model that is permitting such an incredible flood of migrant all part of the same program in my view, So we need reforms on all levels. And this gets me into the executive orders that came from Donald Trump just yesterday.

and we kicked in right away. It would have been, it would have been, it would have destroyed our business.

and their bond offerings. Again, all the interest is paid in ounces, which are stored for free on your behalf. So if you're tired of your golden silver collecting dust at home, or worse, racking of fees having your metal professionally stored, check out Monetary dash Metals dot com slash lockdown again. That's Monetary dash Metals dot com slash lockdown to learn how you can start putting your medal to work today.

climate change. I do think that there's obvious evidence that, in fact, the climate is changing, but I don't think that it's proven or rock solid science by any stretch of the imagination, that it is this imminent cataclysmic thing that is strictly driven by humanity. In fact, I think it's quite to the contrary. I think the vast majority of the climate change that we're dealing with is natural. It's a product of the Sun's fluctuations as well as

you know Earth. So just look at the fear mongering that we dealt with from al Gore back in the early two thousands, and all of the predictions you made, and what aspect of those have come true. Well, guess what I'm in Florida actually in my which was supposed to be underwater by now Oops, didn't exactly happen, now, did it. So yeah, back to the drawing board on that one. Anyways, I don't like being in these global treaties,

particularly when it's, as Donald Trump pointed out, super unfair. China, who's this incredible polluter, doesn't even have to get on board with it until twenty thirty and who knows if they will. But America gets on board with it right away, to the detriment of the American people and US having to fund it and get taxed into oblivion, not to mention killing businesses and jobs and everything else. I think this is just, as I said, an unimitigated good good job,

Donald Trump. Yes, stay out of the Paris Climate Accords. I'm sure the next president will put us right back in them. But we get a reprieve for at least four years, so let's hope. Next up, we have an executive order for Donald Trump notifying all federal employees are close to all there's some that have their own unions that will be cut out of this deal, but all of the rest of them, the majority, have to go

back to work. Yeah, I know you might be surprised by this, but a huge percentage of employees after the lockdown era ended up doing work from home deals. This ends effective immediately, so we'll see. I think that the good aspect of this one. I think that federal employees are already not very productive or useful, So I think that putting them back, requiring them to actually go to work and demonstrate that they're doing a job that's worth the taxpayer's funds, I don't have a problem with that.

I think that that's a good thing. I think it's a step in the right direction. And I think that we will see a lot of people quit. And I think a lot of the people that quit will be doing so to the benefit of the American people because they are not providing us a good return on investment. So that's fantastic news. I think that I think that this is a step in the right direction. It's a kind of minor one, but that's another executive order that

he passed. Let's get in the next. He then signed an executive order that ended the weaponization of government against political opponents. I don't know what kind of teeth this thing has. It's just kind of a TBD. Certainly the criminal justice system has been weaponized. I don't know what what power the president actually has to stop future administrations from doing the same thing, but you know it's performative if nothing else. He then signed an executive order rescinding

seventy eight of Biden's executive actions. I haven't looked at all seventy eight, but just based off of what I know of his executive orders, I'm happy. I think it's really good to get rid of whatever we can of Biden's legacy, as I think he was a disastrous president on almost every single level. I think he's the worst in my lifetime, and there's been a lot of bad presidents. A lot of people argue George W. Look for the Middle East. I'll grant you, definitely worse for the American

people in terms of the Patriot Act and spying apparatus. Yes, yes, yes, However, lockdowns mandates World War three, hundreds of thousands perished combined between Palestine and Ukraine. And he also did all of this only in four years, whereas George W did an eight. I think there's argument that Biden was worse, but whatever, they're both terrible. Who really cares who was worse. They

both deserve to be in president in my opinion. Then next up, he signs an executive order freezing federal hiring.

car tells are foreign terrorist organizations. This is actually an executive order designating the cartels and other organizations to be foreign terrorist organizations.

it has been a very significant problem. However, I don't think that you're going to be able to stop the flow of drugs regardless of what you do. I think you'll be lucky to stop the flow of people. That is a I mean, and that's a real justifiable concern because that actually falls international security. I think that drugs are not. The war on drugs is last fifty years.

But then you also have legal drugs that are being prescribed to millions of Americans over a twenty year period from big pharma legally that hooks them on opioids. And then you have reforms or whatever that kick them off of these prescriptions or they just can't afford them, or they just decide to go to something stronger and they end up doing street level opioids. This is a bigger

problem than the border. So I am not going to be myopic about this and say, oh, you close down the border and all of a sudden everything's fixed like and I think that's really my bigger point. This is not the fix that Trump is advertising it is, but this has red meat to his base. They know a lot of people that they've lost due to the opioid crisis, fentanyl in particular, and they want it stopped and they don't care what he has to do to do it.

So this is what happens. This is what happens when you ignore a genuine problem and then the state intervenes, and it may present a solution that ends up being a bigger problem. Why do I say that, Well, I'm not exactly interested in going to war with Mexico, are you? You know, don't get it twisted. I think that Mexico to a large extent is a narco state. Their government is controlled, or at least they share power to a

huge extent with the drug cartels. That's obvious. I don't want to go to war with the cartels because more or less we're then going to war with the government, or we're at least requiring the government of Mexico to go to war with the cartels. And guess what the cartels do business in every major American city across the United States. They have tunnels, they have weapons, many of which have been given through Operation Fast and Furious from

the Barack Obama administration. Like, these are trained, dangerous people, and I just hope people are really considering what this means where this might go. If you decide to actually declare war and the cartels decide to declare war back, that you could see major Like you're labeling them terrorists even though they don't do terroristic things in America, unless you want to say the human trafficking, but that's still not terrorism because they're not trying to get a political anyways.

I think that you could see terroristic activity in the United States. The consequence of if you start to use drones or you know, special ops to go after heads of the cartels, will they just accept that or will they decide to try and make us pay a price to I don't know. That's TBD obviously, I hope not. But I think that this is not without risk. I think this is not without risk of turning into a

much wider war. Additionally, if you want to make the claim that these people are a national security threat to the United States of America, well then get Congress to actually vote on this thing, vote for a war. I know you guys don't do that anymore. You haven't done it in my lifetime, longer than I've been alive. But it's so obvious that you're labeling them a terrorist organization so that the CIA can go after him, right, I mean,

we all know this. It also then allows us for a bunch of unconstitutional illegal shit like torture, rendition, all sorts of other stuff, all without a declaration of war. To me, it's quite obvious that they are operating under the AUMF authorize US military force after nine to eleven, after the patriotach And I think that's what this is.

I think it's a way of circumventing congressional action to actually try and go after this problem, and instead circumventing the entire system and just saying I'm gonna do whatever I want to stop this. Look, if Joe Biden did it, I'd oppose it. Donald Trump's doing it, I oppose it, or at least I'll say this. It has the potential for real dire consequences, and I'm not sure that it'll be productive in terms of stopping drugs.

is going to create an incredibly interesting paradigm. Now if it's just used for leverage to put pressure on the government of Mexico to essentially do the bidding of the United States to try and stop the flow of humanity coming into our country, Okay, I can see that argument, Like it's kind of like the using tariffs in game theory. Is that what he's doing. Maybe I don't know. That's

what he's doing with the northern border. He's threatening tariffs against Trudeau even though he's on his way out whoever's gonna be in charge of Canada in the next couple months. He's saying, look, you get your border under control, or I'm gonna tear if you guys too. This is all game theory stuff. Will his bluffs work and are they bluffs? I don't know, Stay tuned, but think about think these things through. Just really consider, like, do are you prepared

to have a war on your border? Like we haven't had that in our lifetimes.

page with that. He also signed an executive order securing the Southern border. I think that is the answer as opposed to going to war with the cartels. You probably ought to just secure the border, but you know, is what it is. He also signed an executive order granting TikTok an extension to sell to an American buyer. I am still not convinced that they ought to be forced, and I'm not sure that Supreme Court it's constitutional.

this work is a good idea. Let me also emphasize one hundred and eighty million Americans use TikTok, and I don't know how many of them use it for business purposes, but it's not a small amount. And those that aren't even using it for business use it to get their message out there, and they value that tremendously. Again, let me repeat no conflict of interests here. I don't have a TikTok account. Okay, maybe I'll get one after this.

I haven't thought about it, really, but there's a lot of value to the American people when it comes to that app like. There's a reason that people are so

pissed off about it, and I respect that. I respect their their desire to be able to speak freely like I've I've poured so much time and energy into Twitter now x if it were to be banned by the government because they said, oh, Elon Musk is under the influence of a hostile government, which was one of the four or five that they listed, and they forced Elon to sell to Jack Dorsey, which then put it back under the purview of basically the deep state.

the Senate seat in Ohio. I'm not sure which he's going to do at this point, but it's quite obvious to me that his H one B stance was so unpopular, in part because of Sam Hyde's response and the incredible firestorm that was created around that debate topic, that he kind of screwed himself, like he just people.

he basically says the same thing. He's like, He's like, yeah, we need to have the best people come here, and yeah, yeah, yeah, And you know H one b's are important.

high quality waiters. You you got to get the best. Now, then you go into people like Larry and he needs engineers, and Masa needs and this gentleman needs engineers like nobody's ever needed engineers, right, So we have to have the quality of people coming in now. By doing that, we're expanding businesses and that takes care of everybody. So I'm

sort of on both sides of the argument. But what I really do feel is that we have to let really competent people, great people come into our country, and we do that through the H one program.

in Mexico policy. We'll see if Mexico actually enforces it. The new president there, I think her name Shinebaum, which is a very interesting name for a Mexican president.

over two hundred pounds, I'm six foot one. Like, only the most freakishly strong woman is going to be able to save me from going down on the on the front line. So like I think, rationally, yeah, probably not the best idea, not the best role for them to be in, just as most women would not be able to play in the NFL.

just egregiously lied. They issued that letters that during the debate, Joe Biden could go up there and he could lie to the American people, saying fifty one intelligence officials say that the story is bullshit, So Donald Trump's a liar. In reality, we all knew, at least those in the independent media space knew, and those that listen to this

knew that they were lying. That we knew that that laptop was real, and them bearing the story was just to help the Democrats win the White House, and it did.

this distinction might being made. But I think at the end of the day, like there's probably already contract law that's in place for this, So can you just like, can we just claim Mexico is now named South United States and we now control it like, no, so is there anything? Is there any teeth to this change? And I'm guessing not so. It seems just like performative virtue signaling, but like in a nationalistic pro America sense, it's very

it's very strange, very strange. And last but not least, and maybe my favorite, he put a ninety day pause on all foreign eight all foreign eight, that's what the initial executive order said. And then I find out that there's a little cutout, little caveat for friends over in Israel, Like, you gotta be fucking kidding me, man, Like he does

so much. Like everything that happens, they do so much to add to the conspiracy theorist or like the anti Semitic worldview of like we're doing everything at the best Israel. And then you have some evidence like this, and you're like, what am I supposed to say about this? What the fuck am I supposed to say about this? And keep

in mind, we give aid to fucking everybody. We're sending billions here, billions there, Like almost everybody in the Middle East gets a little fucking chunk of change from us. And sometimes it's not so little billions. Usually it's just nuts. It's nuts. Look, I can't blame the graper audience that goes.

We're done. Okay, That would be a step in the right direction. I think that overall, Donald Trump had a very good first day. I'm very nervous about his actions declaring drug cartels as terrorist organizations because I think that is just a methodology to circumvent normal protocols when it comes to using extraordinary violence that would normally be classified as war against our neighbor Mexico. So that is probably

the thing I disagreed with him most on. I think the other things were kind of marginal, not huge changes, But I think overall he delivered on the vast majority of his promises. And I think that if if ross all Brick gets to go home tomorrow, which I think he will, he will have delivered on his promises to libertarians as well. So all in all, not so bad.

What kind of Nazi argues in favor of h one bes which what kind of Nazi puts on the hat and go. It was to Israel with Ben Shapiro. He's a fucking pretty bad Nazi if so, right, So what are we arguing here? But corporate media is still gonna argue it. I think he spased out. That's my honest opinion. I think he's spassed out. And as a libertarian who knows lots of autist, uh not the first time I've seen someone spaz out and do some weird shit.

I just called the mother of Ross William Albrett. He misspelled his name, but whatever, to let her know that in honor of her and the libertarian movement which supported me so strongly, it was my pleasure to have just signed a full and unconditional pardon of her son Ross. The scum that worked to convict him were some of the same lunatics who were involved in the modern day weaponization of government against me. He was given two life

sentences plus forty years. Ridiculous. Yes, President Trump, it is ridiculous, and man, as you can telap and cry, I can't hide it. I can't lie about it. So I just texted Lynn, I'm thrilled beyond words that this lady, this lady who I've I've now met and spent time with I don't know a dozen times, a dozen different events. She is such a nice person, and she fought so tirelessly for her son. She puts all parents to shame in terms of just her indomitable will just and she's

so nice. You would never suspect someone to be so nice. And you have such a fighter and just all of her kindness belies this incredible, burning drive to get her fucking son out of prison. She's a fucking hero man. She is just I don't want to cry again, but my god, what an incredible human being. And uh, all right, not gonna cry again. Thank you, President Trump. Not gonna cry. Thank you President Trump for keeping your promise. A lot of people didn't believe it. A lot a lot of

people didn't believe it, and he delivered. So I can't believe him granding. And again, I just if you knew her, trust me, if you knew her, you'd understand why this is so special to me. I just there's not a person on the planet that deserves this victory more than Lynn Albricht. She's such a fucking awesome human being and she's such a fighter, and I gotta give I gotta just take a second to thank Angela mccartal, you know, for her to have put her reputation on the line

the way she did. Sure, Dave and I did too, But like she was in a position of authority within the Libertarian Party and she negotiated this deal when you know, she could have lost her chair position, she could have been sued or who knows what you know, she was ultimately risking and doing this. Uh and and so many people doubted her, so many people, and she demonstrated the same will that Lynn did. Just unbelievable fight and courage.