"The "public debate" about AI is confusing for the general public and for policymakers because it is a three-sided debate" by Adam David Long - podcast episode cover

"The "public debate" about AI is confusing for the general public and for policymakers because it is a three-sided debate" by Adam David Long

Aug 04, 20237 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Summary of Argument: The public debate among AI experts is confusing because there are, to a first approximation, three sides, not two sides to the debate. I refer to this as a 🔺three-sided framework, and I argue that using this three-sided framework will help clarify the debate (more precisely, debates) for the general public and for policy-makers.

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/BTcEzXYoDrWzkLLrQ/the-public-debate-about-ai-is-confusing-for-the-general

Narrated for LessWrong by TYPE III AUDIO.

Share feedback on this narration.

[125+ Karma Post]

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android