Learning from Small Mistakes to Avoid Big Mistakes, Operating Rooms and Patient Harm - podcast episode cover

Learning from Small Mistakes to Avoid Big Mistakes, Operating Rooms and Patient Harm

Feb 23, 20239 minEp. 325
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Blog post

  This article caught my eye today, and it's a change of pace to think about and write about mistakes other than my own (and I made more today — but healthcare mistakes are more important).

Penn Medicine hospital cited over wrong-site surgery

It's a mistake to perform surgery on the wrong leg. Not an “unintended mistake” (which is redundant). All mistakes are unintentional. Intentional harm could be called sabotage or assault....


Transcript

I'm our Craven here, my upcoming book, the mistakes that make us in the book, I share insights and strategies for cultivating, a culture of learning Improvement and Innovation a place where mistakes are embraced as opportunities for growth and punishment is recognized as counterproductive to learn more about the mistakes that make us, visit mistakes, book.com. Hi, it's Mark Raven here. Welcome back to lien blog. Audio is it's been a while, but

this is episode 325 for February 23rd. 20, 23 to 23 23, the headline title of the post is Big mistakes or the result of not learning from small mistakes. This time in an operating room and you can find the blog post at lean blog dot org, slash audio 325, so article caught my eye today. It's a change of pace to think about and write about mistakes, other than my own as I blogged about. Out. But didn't do an episode on. Wrote a blog post yesterday

about mistakes. I made with my mainly in podcast, I made more mistakes today but hey, Healthcare mistakes are more important. So the headline of the news article is Penn Medicine Hospital cited over wrong site surgery in. This is from Lancaster Pennsylvania. So, Framing this in terms of mistakes and I'm writing a new book trying to finish the manuscript of a book about creating a culture of learning from mistakes. You can learn more at mistakes.

Book.com by the way. Sorry for jamming, a plug in there, and I'm talking about the serious story. So it's a mistake to perform surgery on the wrong leg. It's not I've heard people use this phrase unintended mistake, I mean that's redundant all mistakes are Intentional by definition, intentional harm would be called sabotage or assault. Not saying, that's what happened here seems like clearly a mistake.

So, from the article, it says, Pennsylvania health officials have cited Lancaster. General Hospital for several safety issues in recent months, including a wrong site. Surgery pain, live reported February 23rd. There was as the story says an anonymous complaint. Matt seems like evidence would be Spected evidence of a parents or suspected lack of psychological safety this anonymous complaint? I mean, why did it have to come to that? Why can't people speak up?

About problems risks. Near-misses incidents harm. So from the article, it says, state reports cited by the publication show a surgical team at the hospital performed reconstruction surgery on a patient's wrong, ankle in December. Clearly a mistake. So what happened what we know from the article and I'm going to Provide some educated guess conjecture here. I guess the article does say a staff member marked the correct ankle prior to surgery. That's good.

But did not place the mark within two inches of the surgical site as per Hospital policy, that's bad maybe that's a mistake but the starting to sound like to me a cultural problem. Did people not feel safe to speak up about this bad practice? I mean we'd have to assume this wasn't the first time. Somebody didn't Properly, Mark, the surgical site. So then what happened? Another employee placed a

tourniquet on the wrong leg. And the surgical team realized the error shortly after the operation. So this mistake was a team effort and I'm not suggesting that naming blaming, and shaming. A group of people would be better than blaming just one instead of asking who screwed up not which person or people we should ask, how can That have happened. Prompted by a post by and Richardson on LinkedIn.

She's a nurse former nurse executive, patient, safety and health care culture, advocate for lack of a more formal way of describing her. I wrote the following is a response to her post. Some people when they read that article while asked, who should be punished a better question is what could have prevented that maybe whose fault is it? That the problem wasn't prevented unless that was the first time that surgery had ever been done, I'll propose

conjecture here. There's a high likelihood that one or more of these things happened. Previously won the surgeon didn't mark close enough to the surgical site. We could call that a bad practice to somebody almost put the tourniquet on the wrong leg. But Just in didn't do it, we might call that a near-miss, they did it properly but they almost did it wrong.

And then third you maybe somebody did put the tourniquet on the wrong leg but then caught it and then put it on the correct leg which would also be a near-miss even though the patient wasn't harmed. So if people aren't speaking up and Reporting bad practices and near misses and again I'm assuming those have been happening, probably not a bad assumption if they're not speaking. That's a culture problem. So whose fault is that?

Not the Frontline staff, they don't create culture, look higher in the org chart, don't blame the employees for not speaking up, when they might feel like one or the following are true one. When it's if they feel unsafe to speak up because they or somebody else will get in trouble too, it's not worth the effort because nothing gets fixed or three, they don't have time to report the problem. And again, point to Maybe applies not worth the effort and again. So there's there's fear and

futility that's involved. So, if leaders aren't, actively encouraging people to speak up about bad practices and near-misses like really, really encouraging it on an ongoing basis, that's a leadership problem. If they're not rewarding the people who do speak up that's the leadership problem and I don't mean giving them money. I mean like treating them respectfully with you in a reacting in a constructive way and thanking them for speaking up. If they don't do that, it's a

leadership problem. If they marginalize or ignore or punish them, that's what leadership problem. And if they're not turning incident reports that do happen into effective problem solving which should lead to Improvement and prevention of future mistakes. That's a culture problem. That's a leadership problem. So for all of the loose talk that we hear about quote-unquote accountability, And I hate that word because it usually means

punishment. Why is it apparently only the Frontline employees who ever face life-altering punishments. Then I mean a 40,000 dollar fine as was levied against the hospital for this and other mistakes. A 40,000 dollar find is not life-altering to the hospital or

its leadership team. So a hospital, spokesperson made the predictable tired and seemingly inaccurate statement like they always make quote, ensuring the safety of all patients is our top priority end of quote, as the late great, Paul O'Neill might have asked how do we know that's really true. How do we really know ensuring the safety of all patients is our top priority every moment of every day. Is an ask in her LinkedIn post.

Why do these things still happen in 2023 punishing mistakes or threatening the punish them doesn't lead to fewer mistakes. Some people believe it helps but again punishing mistakes or threatening to punish them doesn't lead to fewer mistakes. It certainly doesn't get us to zero mistakes. So what would be my evidence here? If this was I'm not a lawyer, this is a court of law is my closing argument. If punishing mistakes led to fewer, mistakes that strategy would have worked by now.

But it hasn't. So it's time for a new approach. I mean, I'm not saying I have all the answers but my upcoming book annoying plug here on the mistakes that make us explores the idea of creating a culture of learning from mistakes. It shares, what some organizations are doing to prove that a focus on learning and Improvement. Instead of punishment is not actually just fair and just if we want to use the language of just culture it's also more

effective. if we really, Make patient safety our top priority. And if we really want to reduce mistakes, we need to stop punishing them. And instead start learning, start improving, psychological safety. Leads to physical safety. So now I'm just rambling after reading the words in the post but again I hope maybe you'll go check it out. Lean blog dot org, slash audio 325. Make patient safety our top priority. And if we really want to reduce mistakes, we need to stop punishing them.

And instead start learning, start improving, psychological safety. Leads to physical safety. So now I'm just rambling after reading the words in the post but again I hope maybe you'll go check it out. Lean blog dot org, slash audio 325.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android