Starts by saying there exist, two blatant contradictions, which roughly 99% of intellectuals journalists and voters erroneously believe. On the one hand, they say that the free market must be regulated in order to prevent monopolies. It is assumed that these monopolies would have such great power over the market that their customers would be forced to settle for products, far, more expensive than and inferior to those that would be offered under competitive market conditions.
On the other hand, those intellectuals Journalist and voters, explicitly Advocate, that one group, government monopolize, the money supply, policing courts. Taxation legislation compulsory education and a myriad of other things that we may consider to be vitally important. Second, the vast majority of people recognize the moral legitimacy of the biblical commandment Thou shalt not steal, and thou shalt not murder yet.
When it comes to the practices of Taxation and wore, these principles are bullied and Lee disregarded by almost. One if taxation is not theft. Why can only governments do such a thing, why not simply allow? All organizations, companies clubs churches, or individuals to issue taxes. Likewise war is simply a euphemism for theft funded mass murder. A blatant crime that we would never dismiss if non-government actors were to engage in it.
What if Justice required us not to have double standards? And you can read on this just only a couple of pages and then there's a couple of pages at the very End of the book, The afterward in which he elaborates a little bit.
