Welcome to Keith's and I don't tread on anyone. This is a summary and Analysis of trump card by Dinesh D'Souza. He begins by talking about white immigrants immigrated to the United States, referring to the American dream, as being the architect of your own destiny, where you can really make the most out of yourself. It's often mocked that well, you're born poor, and you, stay poor, and the rich stay Rich. This is totally false The Millionaire Next Door.
By the New York Times actually did an empirical analysis about eighty percent of millionaires. Our First generation, you also have Rags to Riches examples of Andrew Carnegie coming from Scotland. When he was 12 with nothing. Being one of the most successful industrialist ever drastically lowering the price of steel. So the masses had access to something that previously only a few kings and queens. Had Steve Jobs coming from a Syrian refugee more or less his
father. Jeff Bezos was the is the son of a Cuban, immigrant giving us Amazon, which gave poor people. Two products and services. They otherwise never would have had access to my favorite place, in Arizona, lost five or eight those Taco Shop. I had to throw in there and the co-founder of Google was a refugee from the Soviet Union. We also have the average Joe, so it's not just well, a few people escape out of the depths of American poverty.
We actually have data showing us things that are vitally important to life washing machines, clothes, dryer, dishwasher, refrigerators, stoves microwaves. Is color TVs DVD, video cassettes, personal, computers, telephones, cell phones, and air conditioners, all households in 1970. Versus poor households in 2005. We see that in every case, for these major things that are very important to life and allowing us to be fulfilled live with dignity. We see that in every case.
There are more poor people who have access to these products and services today than everyone did on average. In the, in 1970. Also, a stove today is much better than a stove way back. Then, this is a caught this happens as a Cause. A result of competition voluntary exchange Innovation, voluntary investment, and a number of other things that are unique to free markets and voluntary exchanges. He then goes into how every Democrat on the debate stage, raise their hand.
When asked, if they would support, you know, healthcare for illegal immigrants. This means literally in theory, 7 billion, people could be on the payroll. This is described by democratic. Lists and has free. Here is the cost of Bernie's free stuff. That's basically the lie between free medical care, retirement infrastructure College family, pension fund jobs program. It's not free. I mean, what do the health? Care workers, not get paid or they all volunteers.
Now, what they mean by free is the state coercively funds. It, it's literally like saying, well the military's free. Don't worry about it. It's not free. It. Perfect example, is the war on poverty is caused 23 trillion. Ian dollars since 1965 under Lyndon, Johnson's, implementation and Nat is that's
what free means. 23 trillion dollars and never admitting they're wrong because the poverty rate stopped following at around that time in 1965. He then did not show then goes into India. Is an example of a country that embraced free markets and they can stall. A drastic increase, the economic liberalisation in India, refers
to the economic liberalisation. The country's economic policies with the goal of making the economy more market and service oriented and expanding the role of private and foreign investment. Although unsuccessful attempts at liberalization, 's were made in 1966 and the early 80s full liberalization was initiated in 1991. Specific changes included, reducing import tariffs, deregulating markets, and reducing taxes.
All of which led to an increase in foreign investment and high economic growth in the 1990s and 2000's from 92 2, 2005 foreign investment increased, three hundred and sixteen point nine percent and India's gross domestic product, Grew From two hundred and sixty six billion in 1991 to 2.3 trillion in 2018.
Another case of how embracing much more of a free market approach is China in. This is a well documented in a book, by Ronald coase, how China became capitalist as Johan Norberg. The Economist mentions almost all 50 million jobs, created in China City since 1978 more or less around the fall of now's time were created by private companies. These companies accounted for about a third of exports in 1995. But almost 90% today. This was a move towards free
markets in a country. You also have comparable countries with similar populations in similar history, chili much more capitalists and Venezuela Haiti much less capitalist than the Dominican Republic North and South Korea, speaks for itself. Botswana much more free. Market than Zimbabwe East Germany, much more totalitarian than West, Germany as Milton Friedman says, the record of
history is absolutely clear. There is no alternative way, so far, discovered of improving, the lot of the ordinary people that can hold a candle to the productive activities that are Unleashed by the free enterprise system Dinesh. Continuously makes the case that free markets are superior to State economies. One, very important thing that he doesn't really touch on, is the difference between political. Entrepreneurs and Market entrepreneurs historian Bert, folsome made an important
distinction in his book. The Myth of the robber barons between political entrepreneurs and Market entrepreneurs, the political entrepreneurs exceeds by using the implicit violence of government to Cripple his competitors and harm consumers, the market entrepreneur. On the other hand makes his fortune by providing consumers with products. They need at prices. They can afford and maintains an expansive market share by remaining Innovative and responsive to Consumer demand the documentary.
Goes on to talk about Marxism, cultural verse economic. This is vitally important. We see this all the time. So, originally the justification for why we need a dictatorship of the proletariat that the Bolsheviks need to overthrow the Kaiser. Kaiser, the romanoff's or the Tsar is because the workers being so mistreated and we have an evil Bourgeois Z. That's why we need a big government because there's such a big Injustice, only a big
government can make this right? Well, that didn't really work in America. So what they're doing now. Instead of booze Y Z versus proletariat. It's black versus white man versus woman. This is what cultural Marxism more or less is the cultural Marxist have basically no logical case. I mean, they think that well whites are processing blacks and minorities. They statistics show that it's not even close. As far as black-on-white crime
versus white on black crime. And you know, when the police kill a black person, it's absolutely terrible, but I mean, Brianna Taylor gets head Line news for months at a time, and Duncan limp was killed the day before and no one in his house, shot back at the cops. Whereas in the Brianna Taylor case there was shooting back, of course, you know her and her boyfriend were totally justified nonviolent crimes, but this goes to show you that it's a driven agenda that Dinesh does a great
job of exposing. We also have Kelly Thomas and Tony tempeh. These people were just killed by the police. The, the bottom two are on camera and there were no riots. There was no wall. While media coverage in 2019 police killed 41, unarmed people nine, more black 19 were white. So the idea that it's only happening to one group or it's disproportionately happening. Look, men are 95% of prisoners and like, 95 percent of those
who get shot by the police. Not because the police are sexist because they happen to be going after criminals. He talks about, he shows a great video of excuse me. He shows a great video of this guy robbing a bank saying, there's no real principal difference between the Socialist, dictator taking your money and the Socialist majority. I thought that was excellent. Of course, Democratic socialism is voting away rights, which is in principle. No different. No. No, I'm coming to rob you on
behalf of a different group. Not just because I want to, that's the same thing. This democracy commonly referred to as two wolves and sheep voting on what's for dinner. It doesn't even recognize the rights of individuals. It's inherently immoral Dinesh then goes into the benefits of the entrepreneur which I thought is of very good case because
Karl Marx originally says that. Well, there's just the business who just has the capital that the state just gives him and is in his name and then they just repin all the money. As if businesses never go out of business and entrepreneurs lose everything. It's something like 70% of businesses, go out of business. So Dinesh lists the benefits of the entrepreneur. He says the vision and I Idea of
what to sell. How to make the product or service hiring organization, where to make the product, where to sell the product or service, how to market the product and sell it to people, they provide the startup capital or the investment. They innovate to stay competitive and they have a lot of unpaid time investment years, before they are profitable and they have to constantly anticipate the wants and needs here is the great quote from the movie. This is capitalism's trump card.
It encourages creativity. And empathy and puts them at the service of the wants and needs of the people. The inequality. The Socialist left despises isn't created by the entrepreneur. It's created by us. The proud boast of democratic socialism, is that it puts the people in charge of the economy. What control do you have over the post office of the DMV? We vote in elections every two or four years, but as consumers we exercise our choices daily through the market.
The free market is far more reflective of popular consent than Makar attic socialism. We don't have to extend democracy from the political to the economic sphere because we already have it. Capitalism not socialism is the true form of social justice. Excellent.
Probably. That's the, I'd say that's the best part of the movie, he then goes into but legs it which is a number of blacks leaving the Democratic party and the negative rights that Terrence Kate Williams mentions in his speech that people don't owe you anything. You're not entitled to other people's property or other people's time. So this Very important to touch on - rights to have a foundational. Understanding of what is a morally Justified action and an
unjustified action. He then goes into Venezuela. Now, this is countries a total disaster and, you know, now they're saying, well, that doesn't really count as socialism. It's vitally important to know at the time. It was totally recognized popularly. As this is a socialist Revolution. This guy is working for the people not for the Bourgeois Z. Let's all be Friends with him Noam Chomsky, Donald Glover, Oliver Stone, Sean Penn Michael Moore constantly celebrating this guy.
So now that they're totally distancing themselves. And now they're playing the Sweden card, which he also goes into in the documentary goes to show you that it's not that well, we should try socialism to see if it works and then if it doesn't we can go back by the time you realize it hasn't worked and it's inherently immoral. So it should never be tried any more than we should give slavery, rape or kidnapping or Murder door. Human trafficking, a shot to see if it quote works.
It's a moral. So we should never try it. But even when it doesn't work out, they just blame something totally irrelevant. So, don't count on this. Well, yeah, let's give that a shot and if it doesn't work, well, then we'll have the government vote to drastically, shrink the power, we gave it after it, disarmed us, because they go into the gun control agenda that took place, both in Venezuela and is being promoted in.
Erica. He should have mentioned Trump's immoral red flag laws and the bump stock band. But hey, take what you can get. He then goes into the media, double standard take this interesting poll with your friends, ask them. If they have ever heard the name Stormy Daniels and then ask them to brief. You briefly tell you what they know about stormy.
And of course, everyone knows about her because she was on The View. She's constantly talked about Stephen Colbert, had her on, everyone knows her and then ask them what they think of Larry Sinclair. And this will go to show you that there was a blatant double standard in what we are told by the Press. It's important to know that it's not about.
I watch the news. So I know what happens, all you see when you watch the news is what a group of people want you to focus on whether it's Fox News or MSNBC or my channel. I only talk about things that I want to bring to your attention. Everyone has a bias, but the power of Making sure the bias doesn't control. You is simply to know that it exists, embrace it and try to get competing ideas.
So, Larry Sinclair a long time ago, while Obama was running for president, claimed that he had an affair and gave a very in-depth analysis. Dinesh, actually, interviews him again and he stuck to his story for, you know, 12 years and he got know what, media attention and stormy got tons. You can also ask people what they think of Cathy O'Brien story and her book Transformation America. And people will say they have no, Clue who that is. Look that up for yourself more or less.
She claims that she was assaulted by a number of a specific politician, but everyone knows who Christine blasi Ford is. And there's just as much proof for both of them for both of these incidences and she's on the cover of Time Magazine and she gets to testify in front of Congress. So, of course there was a double standard. You can't say, well, if it were true, I'd know about it in the media. The point is not, we know one is true and what is false?
The point is is that there is selective Choice as to what is on our screen and what occupies the mind of the populace, another example of media, double standards and bias is Trump's quid pro quo with Ukraine. This is just something I always assumed happened with foreign aid and I'll payments to other countries, but if your standard is quid, pro quos are bad.
We have Donald Trump. We have Joe Biden on tape at the Council on Foreign Relations saying, If the prosecutors not fired, you're not getting the money. This was a prosecutor who was looking into Joe Biden's, sun's energy Scandal. So I mean, if that is clearly a quid pro quo with this, for that, the money for the firing of this man, producing the charges. So, it's just incredible. When you see these double standards. You see the media is just an, it's just an activist organization.
It's not about getting informed or anything. They have a great conversation in a church with this gentleman. Christian organizer who says the one thing that a totalitarian regime cannot allow our citizens to hold an allegiance to one higher than the government. In other words, when your conscience conflicts with Congress, or the state, who do you choose? The government needs a monopoly on Authority. So they don't want people to believe, Thou shalt not murder and thou shalt not steal.
So when that, you know, the state tells you to do something, you don't say, well, my parents tell me. Not to do that. My family tells me to ask my friends, tell me that there's the Bible, there's the Quran, there's libertarianism. There's utilitarianism. It's all about the state, having Total Domination over your life. And that's what the anti-christian anti-religious agenda is all about, because they are peaceful alternatives. To the state's Monopoly on Authority, three, major
criticisms of the movie. He didn't Define your, he didn't Define his term. So it's a little hard for people to know when. Something is capitalist.
And when its socialist capitalism is simply a social system based on the explicit recognition of private property and non-aggressive, contractual exchanges between private property owners and in a word voluntourism socialism is the institutionalized interference with or aggression against private property and private property claims another words violence. Another criticism is he should discuss the ultimate check and balance. If you want to be a conservative conserve the great things in
society. We need checks and balances. These are competition equal rights and voluntary funding. So if you get bad service at a restaurant, it's important that you're able to go to other places and not give them money when they give you a bad service. Same thing for police forces and military forces and politicians in Congress. If they don't like if you don't like what, you're Getting you should be able to opt out. I mean if they truly represent you shouldn't be forced to fund
them. This is done in too much further in a book called The Enterprise of law, Justice without the state baibars L. Benson. And equality is also important. So it's important that I have the same rights as a police officer who has the same rights as a politician who has the same rights as someone who works at Target. Everyone has the equal right of not being aggressive against and the right to self ownership and
private property. This is the full Realization that Thomas Jefferson was touching on when he says we hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Finally. He goes into terrorism and says that Iran hates us and just
wants a worldwide caliphate. What he doesn't appreciate is the fact that if you look at Bin Laden's, own words, his justification for why he hates America is very clear in He ate he says it's the blockade, imposed after the Ferocious war or the fragmentation and Devastation of Iraq. In his 2001 letter. He says, why are we opposing you? He says, why are we opposing you? The answer was very simple because you attacked us and continue to attack us.
He says, the same thing on to Peter Arnett on CNN in 1970 and 1997 and to John Miller in 1998. And this of course, is the The UN United Nations, United States, ambassador to the United Nations on 60 Minutes, more, or less justifying, half a million children dying, which was what Bin Laden was referring to in both of his letters. He also Bin Laden also mentions, the economy Massacre by Israel, and the u.s. Is allied with Israel. So just as when the us as Iran
is funding terrorists. Well, the Muslims say, The source of Israeli funding is America. So we hate them just like the u.s. Eights Iran when they fund terrorist. So, we also have three of the alleged 9/11 hijackers. Constantly referring to their actual reasons, not because, well, there's no Muslims in America and there's no. He jobs. Look, look of their own words, according to dying to win the Strategic logic of suicide terrorism by Robert Pape. What is happening in Muslim
countries today? Blatant occupation about which there is no doubt. There was no dude. More obligatory after faith and to repel him repelling. The Americans occupying land of the two sanctuaries is the most obligatory of obligations and I say to America, if it wants its armies and people to be safe. Then it must withdraw all of its forces from the Muslim lands and depart from our country. So it's the invasion and occupation of Middle Eastern land. That is the blowback that
actually causes terrorism. One other thing. I wish you would have mentioned is the fine people hoax. The most evil device of pieces and nonsense, that's constantly pushed. Its pushed by Joe Biden. In the first presidential debate and by Kamala Harris and her only vice presidential debate. So this idea is just ridiculous. Trump has Jewish grandchildren at Sea idea. That Trump said Nazis and clansmen are fine. People, of course, never happened.
You'd think that Netanyahu wouldn't think so highly of trump if he was a Nazi what he actually. Ali said, was that there are good people on both sides of the statue debate with regard to should statues be torn down in America if the person was racist. So that, of course, is what he's referring to. If you look at the transcript on the right, I'm not talking about the neo-nazis and the white nationalist because they should
be condemned, totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-nazis and white nationalists. Okay, and that's a reality of the situation. Yeah, there's also very good people and BLM, you know, very few but there's also the very few good people and the altar, right? You have to sort of give people the benefit of the doubt when there were in large groups. And everyone is ignorant about politics. Not just these people are uniquely bad.
So I would say the movie gets an 8 out of 10. It is a net benefit for the Freedom Movement. It calls the state of thief. When it says, robbing Peter to pay Paul it exposes State criminality and Corruption. The less confidence people have in the state. Issuing, you know, being the source of civilization is always good. It explains the Monopoly and Authority, all States seek, it Advocates, free market capitalism. It exposes antifa. Terrorists in the Andy. No interview.
It correctly shows socialist support of Chavez before the fall of Venezuela. It opposes gun control. It exposes the blatant media, double standard in the storm reverse. Larry Sinclair case. It shows the threat of covid-19. Tyranny and the real popularity of socialism something I didn't get into, but please watch the documentary. It exposes cultural, Marxism and economic Marxism, and makes the case for being pro-life.
Therefore. I say it is a net benefit to the Freedom Movement and give it an 8 out of 10. Thank you for watching Keith Knight. Don't tread on anyone.