How Basic Economics Debunks Marxism - podcast episode cover

How Basic Economics Debunks Marxism

Mar 11, 20215 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Transcript

Welcome to Keith's night. Don't try it on anyone. And the libertarian Institute. This is an excerpt from an agarose primer by Samuel, Edward conch in the third and a section titled value. Human beings act, why Ludwig von mises said, it best to remove felt on. He's in reality, man. Always has reason to feel unease to feed himself, clothe himself shelter, himself reproduce and feed shelter, and clothe, others amuse. Self and so on unease, cannot be eliminated.

It can however, be reduced. It can also, unfortunately be augmented. If you seek to starve yourself or bore yourself, you would increase your unease. Some actions you perform achieve - goals, some achieve positive ones, those which were move felt. Unease, our values. If someone else has something that will remove your unease but taking it will increase. There's, we have a conflict. In values. This conflict in values. Need not arise from direct

confrontation. Suppose un another are offered a scrumptious dessert and the other is dieting. Desperately you value it. The other dis values. It. Value is subjective. This simple Insight made by Carl Menger teacher of Von mises, revolutionized primitive economics and cured. Many of the problems plaguing the science since Adam Smith had marked heated Menger socialism would have been abandoned subjective value leads to individualism.

It also explains so powerfully why people trade and it demolishes theories of exploitation before subjective. Value marks could look at the work of Adam Smith, who thought value of rows from the amount of Labor one, put into producing something and see, no productive role for anyone but laborers concluding that all the others must be parasites. So, briefly Marx saw no value for the people who came up with the idea of what product or service to sell.

He didn't see any value in where to set up shop, whether it was Manhattan, Nebraska, Florida. So different Tree. And that was a really important everywhere is more or less interchangeable. There's no value in finding where to set up. He didn't value the managerial decision of what to produce in. What quantity should we make one printer? Five thousand five hundred

thousand. He didn't see the value in coming up with startup Capital. It didn't see the value in investing time that you were not compensated for as the entrepreneur trying to Market your ideas to people or two. Other investors know you didn't see value in where to reinvest money. He didn't see value and taking the time and who to find out to hire.

He didn't see value and managers trying to find which people are going to make the business flourish and which are going to screw it up. He didn't see any value in the middle of an operation deciding. How much of the profits should be reinvested? How they should be reinvested in? What products at what? I'm for what demographic is just absolutely ridiculous. Conch and continues. There are parasites in our

system. Economics tells us and we shall use our new understanding to ferret them out in the next chapter. What? He's referring to is people who do not engage in original appropriation or homesteading people who don't engage in voluntary contractual agreements at people who basically use the ideas of violence instead of volunteerism to achieve their ends if we're engaged in voluntary interaction.

We only do so because trading would, you know, presumably remove felt unease for both parties if we're not engaged in volunteerism and weren't engaged in violence and coercion. One party is benefiting not in accordance with another but at the expense of another. So the parasites are people who use violence instead of voluntourism, of course, government by definition is the attempt to use institutionalized, violence to achieve your ends.

Instead of The voluntary means, which all the rest of us have to abide by. Finally, when people trade, they are acting to remove felt unease in both directions. You may give up a smaller value for a larger but never the other way around voluntarily if you're willing to let your brother work for you and you pay him more than he's worth. You know, that this means to you, he's worth extra because he's my brother. You've still gained a greater value. If values were not, Subjective.

Why would anyone trade? We would all value things equally and be content with what we had. Well, not entirely. We could also want more of a value.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android