EP13_咖啡伴侶_科學理論的逼近值(下集)

開放咖啡角

Jun 06, 2020•9 min•Ep. 13

--:--

Listen in podcast apps:

Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app

Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

本集朗讀稿： https://osf.io/zfjbx/ 本集錄音檔： https://osf.io/h5f2s/

這一集討論荷蘭奈梅亨大學大腦、認知與行為中心與心理學院副教授Iris van Rooij(愛麗絲．范．魯歐伊)的評論文章Theory before the test: How to build high-verisimilitude explanatory theories in psychological science，整合前一集的心得，讓自己與聽眾了解逼真性的觀念，以及評估科學理論的有效方法。探討逼真性是為了開啟兩位大師Paul Meehl與Deborah Mayo著作的閱讀旅程，歡迎有興趣的聽眾一起加入。

本集推薦閱讀~

主題文章：Theory before the test: How to build high-verisimilitude explanatory theories in psychological science

https://psyarxiv.com/7qbpr/

Paul Meehl的逼真性指標倡議：

Meehl, P. E. (1990). Corroboration and verisimilitude: Against Lakatos’ “sheer leap of faith.” Working Paper, MCPS-90-01). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Philosophy of Science. Retrieved from http://meehl.umn.edu/sites/g/files/pua1696/f/146corroborationverisimilitude.pdf

Mayo, D. G. (2018). Statistical inference as severe testing: How to get beyond the statistics wars. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107286184

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android

Open in Metacast