Jesus Christ Show | Hour 2 [12/24] - podcast episode cover

Jesus Christ Show | Hour 2 [12/24]

Dec 24, 202329 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Jesus Christ Show | Hour 2 [12/24]

Transcript

You're listening to KFI AM six forty on demand. Quickly, before we get back into calls, I'd like to make a note that a dear friend of the program and producer, Neil Sevadra of this very program, passed away last Thursday, and many of you may know him. His name is and was

Ian Punnett. You've heard his voice on radio through Coast to Coast AM and other radio stations, and he was a faithful believer who dedicated his life to thinking and learning everything he could about God and passing those things on to others. He is survived by his lovely wife and his children. It was due to a very short illness, and he was a man of many strengths and

abilities, but his love of God pushed him through his studies. He became a deacon, and he continued to be a professor, teaching people many things that he had learned along the way. And although the spirit of Ian will live on through reruns on Coast to Coast and those that listen online, that he will be sorely missed by those who knew him, and for those of you who are in the prayer warrior camp to lift up his family and his

children, his wife, the people that knew him to find strength. To lose someone this close to the holidays adds just that little extra kick to the gut. But they believe that he is with his Maker, which was his goal ultimately after his time was done here. So this program today is dedicated to deacon Ian Punnett and all the joy and information and the contagious curiosity that he brought to everyone. Dean, Welcome to the Jesus Christ Show. Hi Jesus, how are you? I am well Dean, what's going on?

Well? I have a weird situation. So I have a son with a girl who they both lived with me in my grandparents' house. They are both gone. We're not together anymore. We broke up before he was born, so we lived together for my son's sake, and it's been really hard. We live together for a year now and we don't get along. We sleep in such a separate bedrooms, we don't talk to each other unless it has to do with my son. And it's been a very very stressful situation on

me. There's a lot of things that have been prior to this that have really made me question my faith. And I'm just and we're still together, and she's been you know, she's almost left my family, her family. We don't like each other, and it's just a very toxic situation. And the only thing I could think that you to give through it is to become a better person, become a better man, because I was not prior to all this, and I'm just really really wondering if I should keep going like

this and we should just leave each other and live separate houses. But she doesn't want to do it because of our son, because she doesn't want to separate his mom and dad. And so the only thing, again I could think to do is to become a better man and just keep trying to make things better as best I can, as we can. And again, so I guess my question is, you know, it's God putting me to the test because I've been a person of faith my whole life. And again I

said before, I was not a good person prior to this. I had a lot of problems. I'm doing much better than I was before now and I just keep telling myself, keep going, just keep being a better person for my son, better person for a situation. And yeah, again, so I'm just wondering, should is this a test, you know, is God putting me to the test or is it just something that should just throw away and give up? Giving up is not really something that God's going to

put in your way, per se. There are wounds that you amputate, yes, and there are wounds that you mandage. You will have to decide that point in your life if there is a toxicity that's going to read that's going to penetrate everything, so like something that becomes gangrenous, a wound that becomes so bad that it's going to go through the rest of the body and destroy the body. Yes, you amputate, but in this particular case you have to pull apart a few things. Does God want you to be a

better person? Absolutely, but that's everybody. Is this a situation that's been put in your path by God? No, I'll tell you exactly who did this, Dean there is. God is not the cosmic killjoy that people think. So the Father isn't running around going Gosh, what do people want?

And let me say no to it. When God talks about marriage, when God talks about connecting with your partner, when God talks about two people coming together and to each other, they will cleave and leave their families to build a new one. The imperative there is that bond because if you are bringing other people into the relationship by way of children and into the world, that's heavy. That's a huge thing for the child, for the parents, for

the community, for the world. These children may grow up to be good, bad, and will have ripple effects throughout the entirety of the world based on those things, depending on the people they meet and the connections they have.

So when you make decisions to do that out of that commitment, out of testing a relationship with multiple years of connecting, dating, seeing each other at the best of the best and the worst of the worst, meeting families, connecting with the families, knowing that those families come attached to the relationship.

When you don't take the time to see people during holidays, during layoff firings, any of these things, you don't take the proper time to do that, each thing you remove from that equation puts you more at risk. You drive a car with bald tires, not a good idea, but you drive a car with bald tires and the oil light on, the engine light on, You don't put on your seat belt you have no mirrors because it broke off. Each of these things add to the consequences that will come with

that decision. So d and these aren't some spiritual things put in a pot as a concoction for God to teach you something. This is a world you built not only for you, but for your girlfriend and your child. And this is merely the consequences of those decisions. So some people think, gosh, to take the time get to know somebody on those things. But I'm feeling the love and the connection you want to hasten that, Well, you

pay for it on one end or the other. If you want it more quickly and easier on the front, then it's going to be more difficult, most likely on the back end and reverse. So you either do the homework at front end of things, or the homework and the troubleshooting and the catching up on the back end. And unfortunately for you, you're at the place where you're at the back end of this having to make decisions based or deal with the consequences based on the decisions you made. Will you learn and be

a better person from it, Well, that's up to you. Life is genuinely ten percent what happens to you and ninety percent how you react to it. We had a question ask about AI artificial intelligence and whether the discussion going on in Revelation thirteen is talking about artificial intelligence, an image coming to life and these things. Well, there have been many different technologies throughout the centuries that people have looked at, and Christians, the people of faith, have

said, this is of the devil, and it goes with everything. It goes for telephones, the home phone, and it goes to radio, it goes to television, it goes to credit cards. Many different things have raised the eyebrow of believers, even the printing press. Things that may seem benign to you now were not to those that saw the technology and its infancy. As that's the concern, right, the Antichrist is coming, the devil's going to try and trick you, and the devil will the devil's been trying to

trick you forever and doesn't need technology to do it. Social media was seen as that platform the same that it was seen like the Tower of Babbel, because now you can bring all languages together, you can translate them, you can do all of these things and connect globally in you're with an instrument in your hand. But I assure you, although technology needs to be understood so that it can be utilized properly, but the tech itself is without morality mankind.

Human kind are the ones that make something either good or bad by using it for something that is moral or immoral. However, it's easier for humankind to look at these things and say, oh, this is good or bad, that technology is good or bad, rather than pointing the finger back at themselves and saying, I am the one that makes this good or bad. So you have an immoral inanimate object, and humans point to that as the problem, rather than looking at themselves as the one that puts the more twist

on something. And as you combine it with whatever you may be doing, therein lies what defines something, not that thing itself. It's always easier to blame something else than to take on the courage of knowing that you controlling the item are the one that is doing good or doing evil. Paul, Welcome to the Jesus Christ Show. Good morning. I'm calling you from Cincinnati,

Ohio and reading in my day's Bible. It's a King James aversion and in Genesis one he alludes that God said to Adam, go forth and replenish the earth. And he's elluding that there of society or a civilization on earth before Adam and Eve, and it was destroyed by Lucifer's flood. And there's a controversy that the word replenished in the Hebrew may mean fill the earth instead of replenish. And I was wanting you to comment on that, if you would

please. Sure, well, there's more than just that as well, Paul. There are some that make the argument when it comes to scripture that in Genesis that they also use a plural. They are speaking in plural in scripture in Genesis as well, So some people assume that there's more. It says in Genesis one twenty six through twenty eight, let us make man in our image after our likeness, and let them have dominion over the fish and the

sea and the birds. So there's the views here come into different beliefs, one of which in Genesis, the belief is these pre atom characters, so they call it pre atomite or pre atomism, is the belief that there was this time where that in Genesis one and two. Basically, Genesis one is articulating the original creation for lack of a better term, and then it was destroyed. Some say that there were perversions, that the devil played perversions in

it. Some even say that that was the time that the devil messed with DNA and dinosaurs came about, and then God had to wipe it all off and start again. And that's why it looks like you have Genesis two, another creation. So there are those that believe that that takes place. This has something to do with something called the gap theory, and in this or a ruin reconstruction theory. These are theories that there was this gap and something

took place, and then God had to create again. So the word replenish simply occurs seven times in the King James version and both times in the imperative that something needs to take place now five times three major profits in the passive forms, and it means to It can really mean refill in some cases, but before getting into the Hebrew, you have to ask yourself why the translators

used that particular verb replenish. The word can be used to mean fill, and it can be used not only to refill or replenish, but just to fill. It can mean to provide to supply, to be made full. So in the context it gives that there's really no need for it to be refill. It could mean satiate, in habit, occupy the whole of So in the context, you have to use that to define as to what's being said and how it's being used. So, Paul, there isn't in the

context. You would need something great, not just one word. You would need something greater to explain why that would be refill. And if you look at it in the context, there's no reason for there to have been a gap or belief that there was a second creation. Essentially, what it is is a headline and then the full story. So the headline in Genesis one is the basics of what is going on in the creation. Genesis two is more of an elaboration and pulling the camera back to see a bigger view of

what was taking place. So in that case, that sets that word into the context and doesn't really give it the ability to say, oh, in this particular context, it means refill or replenish in that sense. And the reason this is is that ancient Hebrew is limited. A lot of words mean different things depending on their context. That has to be understood. There's no reason to put that there and say, okay, well it must mean this, because it could mean that, but in the context, it just doesn't.

There is nothing there. There's nothing that says, hey, here is a second creation, or explaining this was destroyed, or going back and saying there's this gap here that needs to be explained or accounted for. There's just not You have to you have to look further, or you have to actually

create the need for that word to be there in its context. And once you do all that, once you get into having to create seating that word or a necessity of that word, that's when you start cramming thoughts into scripture. Rather the letting scripture breathe forth the truth that's in it, and that's you know, done. A lot a lot of people will try put their views into scripture, whether it's political, whether it's theological, whatever it might

be, try to cram it in scripture. I will tell you this, the King, Jimmy, there is not the best translation, and there are better translations out there. The one used by the production of this show, my producer Neil and the like is the new American standard that has been his focus and study Bible for quite some time, and although there are other really

wonderful translations, that just happens to be his particular favorite. As a study Bible, he finds it to be sound, the translation to be solid and in not only the guidance of the Holy Spirit, but also the guidance of great scholars that took the time to hash these things out understand them in the

context in which they were were seated. So those things are really what is key when it comes to translating or understanding scripture is the context, because in that particular case, you're really having to force it to get that gap theory or to get a second creation. George, Welcome to the Jesus Christ Show. Good morning. I have a life situation question for you. Okay, I'm in a situation. I've been married for quite a few years and my

wife left me. She is a Christian, and I'm kind of debating what I need to do about that. I read in one Corinthians seven thirteen that it says if a believer leaves, let them go. But I'm sorry, if an unbeliever leaves, let them go. My question is, what do you do if it's a believer well, if she abandoned the marriage, that's on her, not you. So in this particular case, has she gone

forward with the legalities of it and decided to divorce you? Well, papers have been filed, but no actions have been taken for quite a while. Well have you You haven't signed anything? Have you signed papers? No? No? Okay, legally we're still still married. But you know, I'm not concerned as much legally as I am spiritual, of course, But this

is someone abandoning you. There's nothing you can do about that unless there is a way for you to reconcile, which would always be my goal and desires to see people reconcile and work together towards these things, especially believers who have made a commitment before God. That doesn't mean that they don't fall apart. It doesn't mean that there aren't divorces. You can go back to Jeremiah three and you can see that even God hands a certificate of divorce to Israel.

So did she give reason as to why she was leaving you? Uh? Not really, I mean probably a whole host of things. You know. I'm not I'm not angry with her, I'm not you know, upset with her, just for questions now is what do I do about it? You know, do I let linger on forever? Or do I force the paperwork through? And you know, I just want to do what God wants me to do. And there's no indication she wants to come back. Okay, Well, without understanding as to why she left, it's hard to see how

it could come back. Is is there another person? Did you have an affair? Did she have an affair? To my knowledge? Okay, so she just said I can't be with you anymore? Pretty much? Yes? And you say she gave you a nice solid list as to why No, No, just I mean it's it's, you know, other than just my own thoughts about what she must feel that she's never really communicated to me. Why just I don't want to live like this anymore? Okay? Well, what was living like this? What was this? Well, how would you

know? From your point of view, she's not here? What would what would you say it was that caused the division? Well, I would say we were both a little too selfish. I wasn't giving her what she thought she should get out of a marriage, and I think U, you know, she was being selfish, thinking that everything ought to be the way she'd like it to be. You know, it's not like we argued. We didn't argue a lot just to kind of grew apart. You know, lived

in the same house. We didn't talk a whole lot. Well, yeah, you become roommates. And when there's no passion for each other, and I don't mean just physical passion, but when there's no passion to connect, to learn from, to teach one another, to do things that inspire or find out what someone's goals are and these basic things, we kind of can fall into those areas of where there is no love. But love Love came

from nothing the first time. You have to learn somebody and find out about them and be curious about them and you know, connect with them, and

that's how love forms. You know. One of the program directors of our flagship station KFI that it helped come up with the idea of this very program used to say his name was David G. Holl And he used to say that love was understanding and although that's not the totality of it, there's power in that is to whittle down the connection by saying, you know what, I know all these things about you and still want to be around you is

kind of like that. And if that fire can go out, as long as two people are alive and communicative, that fire can be lit again. But selfishness is the absolute oxygen sucker of the flame of a relationship. So if that is gone, you have to reintroduce that. And the only way to do that is for humility, is to be able to walk up to your partner or the other person in the relationship and say, I can only do my part. This is where I think I failed. This is where

I think I can do better. We were in love once. I've thought about those days, I've looked at pictures, I've thought about what I love about you. This is the list of what I love about you. Of course, if it's completely dead, then you know I can't love for you. I can only love for me. But I think I can do this. I think that we can find our way back. And if the response is I don't think so, or then you have to prove by living in a way, not for small amount of time, but by living in a

way that shows the reality of your feelings. Remember, it's not what you say, it's not how you act, it's how you react to a situation that truly shows who you are in life, and you reacting to this can show her how much you care. Maybe she wants that, maybe she doesn't. You know, Help me find what you need in your life. Help me find the path that brings you joy. And if you really say that

it's over and there is no peace, there is no joy left. We can't find that spark again, then let's sign the paperwork and end it. But if there's a tiny bit of a possibility, I'd like to do my part to be better, to be a better partner, to focus on you. And the hope is she focuses on you as well, and then everybody's taken care of by each other. That's the key to the relationship. KFI A M six forty on demand.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android