The White House press room has been opened to other news sources, which is a blow to the communist - podcast episode cover

The White House press room has been opened to other news sources, which is a blow to the communist

Jan 29, 202536 min
--:--
--:--
Listen in podcast apps:
Metacast
Spotify
Youtube
RSS

Episode description

The podcaster did not provide a description for this episode.

Transcript

Speaker 1

This is a podcast from woor He.

Speaker 2

The Jesse Kelly Show, another hour of The Jesse Kelly Show on a magnificent Tuesday. We'll hit some of these points from the press conference today, talk about what happened with Pete Haig Seth and Mark Millie, some email, some immigration deportation updates. I'm pretty sure Trump got the cleaning lady here in our building. Oh, that is so much more coming up on the world famous Jesse Kelly Show. Now, I promised you I would dig into this, and I'm

going to dig into this now. Caroline Levitt, Now, I don't know if I should say I know her because I don't know her. I've hung out with her before. We ended up aub and I ended up at the same event Caroline did. This is a few years back back when she was running for Congress and me a bunch of us. We ended up hanging kind of as a group that night. So I don't want to act like we're friends. We don't tag, don't call her, I don't even have her number, but I do know we're

a bit and I liked her. I'd liked her a lot. Very very sharp human being, very sharp human being, and she's Trump's new press secretary, came out today and did her first press conference. Now, before we get into that, let's talk a little bit about the structuring of it, because there was something wonderful happening in the country, really in Western civilization, and it's being pushed along now by the Trump administration. And that's something is the dismantling, the

disintegration of the traditional news outlets ABC, NBCAP, Reuters. They still exist, but now so many people have turned them off. They've turned off NBC nightly News. They don't watch Face the Nation on Sunday anymore, they don't read the New York Times. People get their information from other sources now, radio, podcast, social media, substacks.

Speaker 1

Blog.

Speaker 2

That there's just a million different ways people get information now and that the alternate sources of information. That is one of the greatest blows the communist system has suffered in recent memory because they've been able to control and in fact create so many narratives because you can only go to a few outlets. You know, when you do, you have we'll call it five, it's more than that.

But wh when you have five corporate media outlets, well, you don't exactly have to climb Mount Everest to ensure that your message, and only your message, will get out, work your way through those five institutions, and those five institutions.

Speaker 1

Will carry your water for you forever.

Speaker 2

So if, for instance, you want to spread that, oh, ivermectin is bad for you, now you know that's a lie because ivermectin's been taken by human beings in the billions of doses, as we said.

Speaker 1

But you know that's a lie.

Speaker 2

But if there's only five of you, and you're all trying to sell big pharma products and you're trying to stop people from saving their lives because you want as high a deathcount as possible under Trump, well just convince five organizations to say ivermectin's horse paste, and then there you go. The communist has loved the control of it. Yeah, Chris, go ahead and play that part. Hillary Clinton, that's why she's not the only one to say. This is just

one example. Why did they keep talking about, well, we got to get control of all this.

Speaker 3

We should be in my view, repealing something called Section two thirty, which gave platforms on the internet immunity because they were thought to be just passed through that they shouldn't be judged for the content that is posted. But we now know that that was an overly simple view that if the platforms, whether it's Facebook or.

Speaker 1

Twitter x or Instagram or.

Speaker 3

TikTok, whatever they are, if they don't moderate and monitor the content, we lose it's total control. And it's not just the social and psychological effects, it's real harm.

Speaker 1

We lose total control. You see.

Speaker 2

It's all back to these people thinking they're kings and queens. They want to rule as kings and queens. They know they have to act as if they care about freedom and liberty, but that's not how they see themselves. And they definitely don't see you as a free citizen. They see you as a peasant who lives to serve them, the kings and queens, and they're always finding a way to rule you as such. And back to the White House press conference today, there's been a normal way this

has gone. The normal way this has gone, certainly under the Biden administration, is you sit up there, if you're the Biden's Press sec, if you're coren Diversity higher, you sit up there and you call on NBC five times. Just let them ask a list of questions and then you move on and you call on the AP. Actually, AP's normally first. Did you know that AP's normally first.

They'll call on the AP, and then Reuters, an ABC, and then NBC and none of a social media places, none of the blogs, none of the podcasts, none of those. None of those are usually even allowed in the room, and they certainly don't get asked any questions. But today Caroline Levitt and the Trump administration they packed not only packed the room full of people from all different outlets, so you had the traditional ones there and all kinds

of new ones. They've announced publicly that they're accepting applications to take even more alternate publications in there so people can ask questions. What that means for you and me is instead of NBC getting to ask five questions, today they got to ask one and then told to sit down and shut up, and everybody moved on to other questions. This is a complete new way of thinking, new way

of doing things. We have not seen this before. But as the public, as the public has begun to reject the evil of Western governments, the evil of Western media, and as the public has sought out new new sources, the Trump administration is helping them belong in that effort, and it is wonderful. And without total control of the messaging, communism fails. And the communists have known that forever. They have to control what people see, what people read, what

people watch, what people hear. They have to control it. Without that control, no one's going to buy the system of lies they're trying to build for you. At all times, nobody they want you. They want you to think whatever they want you to think, because after all, remember remember what Catherine Mayer of NPR said, they're trying to reach consensus.

Speaker 4

You see, we are reverence for the truth might become might have become a bit of a distraction that is preventing us from finding consensus and getting important things done.

Speaker 1

You're so worried about the truth.

Speaker 2

We're trying to get stuff done with consensus. But now people can find it, all right, So Caroline Levitt opens up the whole thing today through a bunch of normal people. But she's still called on the standard apparatchicks in the press.

Speaker 1

Here's about how the five hundred.

Speaker 4

Arrests ices made so far since President Trump came back into office.

Speaker 2

Can you just tell us the numbers?

Speaker 4

How many have a criminal record versus those who are just in the country illegal with all of them because they illegally broke our nation's laws and therefore they are criminals as far as this administration goes, I know the last administration didn't see it that way. So it's a big culture shift in our nation to view someone who breaks our immigration laws as a criminal.

Speaker 2

My word, I might I might just sign off for the show on the night, and I might just play.

Speaker 1

That over and over and over and over and over and over again. And you know why.

Speaker 2

It's it's not fanboying over Caroline Leavitt or Trump or anything like that. It's the attitude change on the right. We've been talking about this for a while now, certainly over the last week, we've been talking about how the right has finally dropped this lame nice garbage that has led it to be eaten alive forever, and the right has developed teeth forever, forever, for as long as I've

been alive. If a reporter asks this question of a Republican administration, if a reporter asked me, five hundred.

Speaker 3

Arrests ice is made so far since President.

Speaker 4

Trump came back into office, can you just tell us the numbers, how many have a criminal record versus those who are just in the country illegally.

Speaker 2

Well, Harol, I'm really glad you asked that question. Tina, you look lovely today. I thank you so much for that, and I want you to know that I've directed my administration. We have bent over backwards to ensure that only the most violent criminals will be deported under this administration. We are not out here to separate families. We want to

do the right thing while ensuring the community is safe. So, Tina, I thank you so much for your lovely That's how the GOP would have answered that question forever, allowing them to frame everything, allowing them to control language, allowing them to do it all. Instead, that has stopped. How many are these How many of these people are criminals? All of them? Every single person, man, woman, child who is in this country illegally is a criminal, every one of them.

Speaker 1

And that's not right wing.

Speaker 2

That's how your run immigration in any country, That's how it's always been done. Only in this country, which has been ruled by the disgusting communists summing inside only America would say otherwise.

Speaker 1

Well, I'm not really sure if any of them are criminals.

Speaker 2

But we are finally passed this namby pamby Well, I have to be nice to Tina in the press. We're finally done with this nonsense. And this goes way beyond the Trump administration, way beyond Caroline Levitt. I see this in my personal life everywhere, my friends, everywhere. We have finally developed some teeth. Why does the communists seem hesitant, afraid? Why is he jumpy right now? He's never been handled like this ever.

Speaker 1

Keep going, Keep.

Speaker 2

Showing up at your school board meeting and getting loud, Keep showing up at your city council meeting. Go run for office and run some dirty commedy scumbag out of his local office, and be loud about.

Speaker 1

It when you do.

Speaker 2

And when they come at you come right back at them, harder and faster. That's how we treat them. That's how the communists must be treated if you want to save your country. All right, don't forget that she really killed it today. But the problem is the abortion industry was killing today too. You see every day Rovers's way, no, rovers is wayed. Republican Democrat they kill all the time. What do we do about that? How do we fight back like that. We got roversus wait overturn. What else

can we do? We get women ultrasounds. The most practical tangible tool in the fight against abortion is the ultrasound. The ultrasound introduces a mother to her baby. She goes from being a scared young lady getting ready to kill it, to a mother hearing a heartbeat. Go donate twenty eight bucks to preborn. It's tax deductible, and that twenty eight dollars buys the ultrasound. Preborn dot com slash Jesse is where you give.

Speaker 1

We'll be back.

Speaker 2

Wolves coming up in about ten minutes from now. He's the guy responsible for all those executive orders Trump signed on day one? What went into all that? Let's get smarter in about ten minutes, shall we. In the meantime, let's keep being stupid.

Speaker 1

No, I'm kidding. Let's keep going back to what we were just discussing about.

Speaker 2

Controlling the narrative, not letting them to control everything, reframe everything.

Speaker 1

Oh these illegals, how many of them were criminals? All of them? You hear this? Hear this.

Speaker 2

We've talked before about language and the communists and how purposeful he is about language and why that is The communist doesn't use words by accident. His words are carefully selected to.

Speaker 1

Move the revolution forward.

Speaker 2

His lies, they're always lies, carefully selected. And if you have to describe something that's in any way damaging to your cause, you must choose the correct words to put the best face on that something humanly possible. Again, all communism is deception, because if you're honest about any of it, no one would accept it. Listen to this reporter exchange when they're talking about illegals versus undocumented weapons and actually made an arrest of quote fifty illegal aliens right there, Alex.

Speaker 1

Yep, we call them undocumented immigrants.

Speaker 2

But that again was in the release from the DEEA. She couldn't, she couldn't just let that get out there. Illegal aliens, No, we call them undocumented. Why do they call them undocumented? Because illegal conveys the truth that that person came into your country illegally, that they are a law breaker who violated your sovereignty. Well, the communist wants them here is to break this country in two, So they have to present the finest face. They have to

put the best face on it humanly possible. That's why they die. Well, I just want to correct. You not call it illegals. We call them undocumented. Here the communist understands language matters. Remember that, for your sake, for my sake, language matters. The communist is purposeful about his language. This is his language for a reason, always to deceive, always to move the revolution forward.

Speaker 1

More Caroline, from today, will there be a focus on the overstays for visas as well.

Speaker 4

If an individual is overstaying their visa, they are there for an illegal immigrant residing in this country, and they are subject to deportation.

Speaker 1

Gosh, I'm having so much fun so far.

Speaker 4

This administration believes that birthright citizenship is unconstitutional, and that is why President Trump signed that executive order. Illegal immigrants who come to this country and have a child are not subject to the laws of this jurisdiction. That's the

opinion of its administration. We have already appealed the rule of the lawsuit that was filed against this administration, and we are prepared to fight this all the way to the Supreme Court if we have to, because President Trump believes that this is a necessary step to secure our nation's borders and protect our homeland.

Speaker 2

And she went ahead and fired a shot across the bow at the last administration.

Speaker 4

And I will say, it's very easy to speak truth from this podium when you have a president who is implementing policies that are wildly popular with the American people. And that's exactly what this administration is doing. It's correcting the lies and the wrongs of the past four years, many of the lies that have been told to your faces in this very briefing room. I will not do that.

But since you brought up truth seek, I would like to point out, while I vow to provide the truth from this podium, we ask that all of you in this room hold yourself to that same standard. We know for a fact there have been lies that have been pushed by many legacy media outlets in this country about this president, about his family, and we will not accept that. We will call you out when we feel that your reporting is wrong or there is misinformation about this White House.

So yes, I will hold myself to the truth, and I expect everyone in this room to do the same.

Speaker 1

Dang, that's pretty good. You're pretty good, all right.

Speaker 2

And this little doozy here, the amount of waste in our government, the looting of the American treasury, the looting of the taxpayer in this country.

Speaker 1

It really is one of those things.

Speaker 2

I don't want you to do this, but I'm amazed people aren't marching on Washington with pitchforks and torches out. I really am because of the constant state of abuse with our mind.

Speaker 4

Jojanoenbe also found that there was about to be fifty million taxpayer dollars that went out the door to fund condoms in Gaza. That is a preposterous waste of taxpayer money.

Speaker 1

Who came up with that? Initially?

Speaker 2

This comes back to something I've talked about before. Again, we're gonna talk to THEO Wold here in a minute, the executive order guy. And also remember you can email the show Jesse at Jesse kellyshow dot com. But I've brought this up before. Okay, she brought up fifty million for rubbers for the Middle East.

Speaker 1

Who put that in there?

Speaker 2

Why do we never ever ever know? Nobody can tell me you've heard me rant about this before on the show.

Speaker 1

If I write a book.

Speaker 2

And I did, it's called The Anti Communist Manifesto, not available on paperback, available at Jesse kellybook dot com. Either way, if I write a book and I put a fact in there. If I put anything in there, it has to have a citation on it. I have to note where I got that information. And in that note I lay everything out very specifically. So if you want to go seek out the information I put in the book, you can go find exactly that. Now, this is for a meaningless book. This is for a book I wrote.

Why do the laws the rules of this country? Why are there no citations? Why do I not have a name? Who is the person?

Speaker 1

Not some group? Not not lobbyists?

Speaker 2

What is the name of the person who decided fifty million dollars of your money should go to rubbers in Gaza? Tell me what's their name? That has to change too, all right? THEO Wold joined us to talk executive orders. Next it is the Jesse Kelly Show on a Tuesday. So I don't know about you, but I think back to last week, a week and one day ago, when we tuned into the Old Office and we saw stacks and stacks and stacks of executive orders. It was like they were up to the freaking ceiling and we just

completely flooded the zone with everything. But who wrote all those things? Whose idea was all that joining me now, former deputy assistant to President Trump, former Solicitor General of Idaho almost said, Ohio, that wouldn't make any sense. THEO wold, okay, THEO walk us dumb civilians through the process of executive orders and putting a fat stack of them on the desk day one like that?

Speaker 1

How did this happen?

Speaker 5

Yeah, so Jesse, thanks for having me on. So I think, look like here's the key thing folks got to understand about, you know, the executive order process, how it gets to the President's desk. There's a lot of time and effort that goes into vetting these ideas on the front end. So you've got lawyers, you've got policymakers sitting down trying

to figure out number one, what's the problem. Number two, how can we solve this through pure executive power, not a statute that passes through Congress, not a court ordered decree, but just pen and paper from the president. And then number three, what what are we how are we going to present this? What's the vehicle for getting this out in front of the president and then distributed to the

executive branch, because that's what an executive order is. I think a lot of people forget that is it is an order or a command from the president sitting at his desk that his executive branch, the departments, the agencies, all the civil bureaucrats will do this thing. And so this thing is, you know, eliminate DEI programming. This thing is eliminate a birthright citizenship for illegal alien. This thing is we're going to, you know, declare that federal now

recognizes two sexes, male and female. And so there's a lot of work on the front end. But the big thing here is it's got to be a vehicle that got some kind of legal nexus, and it's got to be something that the executive branch can actually carry out.

Speaker 2

Okay, so let's focus on that one, because, as you mentioned, there are lawyers involved, and this is a world completely beyond my world. So Donald Trump wants to stop DEI in every branch in the government. What do you have to do to come up with that executive order? How many layers does it have to go through, how many edits are there, How big of a nightmare is it to come up with that one piece of paper we all watch him signing on television.

Speaker 5

Yeah, So I think this is one of those you know, comical parts of government, right, which is if the average person who says, look, you've got a leaky toilet, I get in there, I fix it. We have a an airstrip that's full, you know, pot boles, and it's costing us a bunch of money you pay the airstrip. In government, it turns out, you say, this is the problem. We are no longer evaluating applicants for jobs. We're no longer

evaluating individuals for promotion based on their merit. We're looking at their skin color, We're looking at their gender, We're looking at all these other extraneous factors to their job performance. Okay, so that's the problem. This is where the lawyers get involved. Then the solution becomes about, okay, well, look, it turns out that some federal agencies have the ability to prefer subcontractors based on skin color or gender. Some agencies have

the ability to arrange their HR departments this way. So to solve the problem, it's not just taking the wrench to fix the leaky toilet, it's actually figuring out, ultimately, what's the legal basis for the existence of DEI programming, and what's the legal basis to remove it, and so the work on the front end from lawyers, and I know this is one of those things that people will hate to hear because we all love to hate lawyers. The work by the lawyers on the front end is immense.

I mean it's hours and hours of pouring through court cases, existing federal regulations, sometimes you know, analogous state policies. If state governments have a similar government, Okay, how did the state get rid of this kind of idea to do it at the federal level the same way? And that's all the work that goes into producing essentially, you know what is a two and three page document. It's hours and hours of work to write one of those single executive order paragraphs.

Speaker 2

Can you again, we'll speaking with THEO. Wold, former deputy assistant President Trump. Okay, can you can you explain to me when the thinking started, when the idea came to drop so many on day one and just keep flooding them out there, because I've been talking about this. It's frustrated me is for as long as I live watching Republicans kind of dip their toe in the pool and the ease their way in. People are yelling, but not

this time, it's just boom boom, boom, boom boom. Tell me about that idea.

Speaker 5

Yeah, And I think I love that you're honing in on that, because I think that's really one of the greatest lessons to come out of you know, forty five that the President obviously has prioritized as forty seven, which is how do you take power and how do you wield it? And as you note, I think correctly, usually Republicans say, well, you know, we got to go slowly, We got to sort of adjust the temperature in the room,

you know, degree by degree. And the President was very clear with the leaders of some of the organizations he worked with over the last couple of years that for the first week in office, he wasn't going to be messing around. He wanted to move quickly, and he wanted to move systematically through all the biggest hurdles and obstacles to good governments in the country. So it was his expectation for going back, I mean a year and a half, if not two years, that the opening week wouldn't be

one executive order. If you recall remember way back in seventeen January twenty seventeen, he signed one executive order on day one that it wasn't going to be like this, that this time he wanted sort of shotgun awe. And I think the other thing that you note, which is in the shotgun awe, it has proven pretty difficult for the left and a lot of their you know, supporters in the media and in Congress to keep up with

the flow. And that's by design, by design to both systematically uproot a lot of the Biden administration's work through executive order, but also to flub the zone. So it is more difficult for them to file the lawsuits, to do their due diligence and find the tiny vulnerabilities that exist in some of these executive orders. So look, I think a lot of people forget this isn't a new presidential administration. It's the second chapter of an ongoing story, right.

So he's coming in here, clear eye. He's got a team, like Stephen Miller, learned a great deal last time from how courts approached the executive orders, how Congress thinks about them, and he's made adjustments so that we don't fall into the same traps as we did in forty five. And so I think what you're seeing is power how to take it, how to wield it, and how to keep your enemies off balance.

Speaker 2

Do you get the impression THEO that there are fewer snakes in his administration this time than last time. I've been extremely critical of Trump for his personnel decisions during this first four years. I'm still blown away impressed by the efficiency I see right now, by the organization I see. I'm not going to ask you to name names, but I don't see Jared Kushner running things anymore. I don't see the people kneecapping him the way it happened last time. But that's what I see. What do you see?

Speaker 5

Yeah, so I think it's a continuation of the same theme. Right number one. I would say, as one of the I think this is somewhat inarguable. There was maybe twelve to twenty of us last time who were one hundred percent aligned with the president's agenda and saw our jobs as ensuring that his agenda was furthered. And look all of us, you know, friends of mine, to this day, all of us can tell stories of how we were punished over the years because of that. This time, the president,

I think has learned. And if the president hasn't learned, then people again like Stephen Miller, have learned, which is you look at the playing field and the difficulty for the person keeping score at home is it's not always the big roles, the exciting roles where people can prove to be the obstacles to the president's agenda. It's those positions you don't hear about in the news that turn out to be those, you know, the bend in the

joint where things get broken. And so this time, people like Stephen Miller said, no, I'm going to make sure that we have someone who's perfectly aligned with the policy vision and he is someone known for their aggression in these key positions throughout the government, so that the agenda doesn't get stalled out and that we are getting the maximalist idea through the system every time. And that again is just you know the benefit of having this look

at the silver lining here. And I know a lot of people, myself included, I would have wished that he wanted. You know, he cleared the decks and he was allowed to take office in twenty twenty, no interruption. But the silver lining in all of this is he came in last week with eyes wide open and the knowledge of how the deep state works. And he's got a team now who's willing to fight the deep state alongside with him instead of say, hey, let's go slow, maybe we can persuade them.

Speaker 2

Yeah, he certainly did that four years. That four years honestly may have been necessary, as freaking miserable as it was.

Speaker 5

Hey, that's right. Yeah.

Speaker 2

Former Deputy assistant to Donald Trump, THEO Wold, thank you so much for teaching us some things tonight, THEO.

Speaker 1

I appreciate it very much.

Speaker 5

Grab me on, appreciate it. Good to be with you.

Speaker 2

How about that we're so much smarter than our friends and family now about how this stuff works? What, Chris, we are. I'm gonna go home. I think I'm gonna text someone tonight about that. Hey, you know how they do executive orders and how that stuff works? All you don't I do? That's too bad anyway. Maybe maybe you should listen to the Jesse Kelly Show and then you'll be smart like me. That's what I'll tell people. I

tell people that all the time, Chris. What as often as I tell people about rough greens, I tell people listen, listen, your dog, your dog's gonna die because of you. I mean he's gonna die too early because of you. I love telling people that, and then they get all sad and mad at me, and I said done, look at me. I put rough Greens on my dog's food. My dog gets vitamins and miners, my dog gets probiotics, my dog gets real nutrition.

Speaker 1

You're the one giving your.

Speaker 2

Dog the empty calorie garbage that is dog food. Why do you think all dogfood is brown? Why is it all the same color. That doesn't make sense unless you just accept that they've killed all the nutrition in it and you're giving your dog nothing. We go to the vet too much. In the vet's freaking expensive. I swear Roughgreens will save you money.

Speaker 1

You want a.

Speaker 2

Free jumpstart trial bag of it, Sprinkle it on your dog's food. Eight three three three three my dog or Roughgreens dot com slash Jesse.

Speaker 1

We'll be back. Get the cue.

Speaker 2

It is the Jesse Kelly Show on a Tuesday, a wonderful Tuesday, and do not forget. You can email the show Jesse at Jesse kellyshow dot com and we're gonna dig into some of those emails in just a moment. But did you hear about this rapper chick? I can't. I can't. As I walk in, I see him like making faces or whatever. I'm like, oh, man, she already knew icket fit in his car.

Speaker 1

Yes, I can believe it. He told her there's not enough room in his car.

Speaker 2

The kicker car was when he started to talk about his tires.

Speaker 5

You know, I feel like that was a slap in the face. That was like a my tires, you know.

Speaker 1

Like the driver said his tires could not handle her weight.

Speaker 5

For every big person you turned down because they hain't fit.

Speaker 6

In her car or.

Speaker 5

Xls no, I don't never have to order ober xo.

Speaker 2

He apologized, canceled the ride and left her there.

Speaker 1

The rapper says, she's pretty tough.

Speaker 5

It is as heavy as ten boxes that you might be moving.

Speaker 1

I've seen this lady.

Speaker 2

She's got to be twenty boxes, twenty thirty boxes, and since the dude didn't show up in a one ton, he decided he couldn't handle the weight.

Speaker 1

I'm sorry. It's just so funny to me.

Speaker 2

Everyone has to try to be famous for something nowadays. At today, you have some rapper who weighs eight thousand pounds.

Speaker 1

Now she even gets a news.

Speaker 2

Story out there because she can't fit in the uber What a world, Jesse, Why do you think we never seriously helped the South Vietnamese retake the North. We spent over a decade backing the South, helping them defend from the North. But why if we were there because communism is bad, then why didn't we just eradicate liberate the North. The United States of America has never, ever, ever, ever, ever been comfortable with conquest. There are societies throughout history

who have been very comfortable with conquests. That's just kind of how they did things. The United States of America has never been that way ever. And contrary to what you're America hating dirtball professor taught you in college to what your teachers teach you in school.

Speaker 1

Ah, the trail of tears.

Speaker 2

Even early settlers in the United States of America, because this country was so Christian based, were very uncomfortable expanding and what to do with the Indians.

Speaker 1

I don't know what to do? What do we do?

Speaker 2

I know every every modern day live Ah, we just get acided him. It was a non stop point of argument in this count. What do we do? Should we leave them? Maybe we should move them here? I don't understand no, we can't just say. It was always a debate, always an argument. We were always feeling icky as we moved westward, and move westward, and move westward. We were always unsure of ourselves about it. You still see evidence of that to this day, evidence that is exploited by the libs in your life.

Speaker 1

We experienced that.

Speaker 2

Remember that history show I did on the Philippines, on the war in the Philippines, when we won the Spanish American War, and then we then we really kind of conquered the Philippines, and how uncomfortable and how unpopular that was at the time, huge controversy in this country. Should we be there, We shouldn't be there. This is wrong, I don't We're not a colonial power. We're better than this. The United States of America does not fight wars of conquest.

We really just don't. We do not fight wars of conquest. The two you can argue we did one. Let's talk about the Civil War, and now I realized the United States of America split them.

Speaker 1

But that was a war of conquest.

Speaker 2

And you know Sherman's March to the Sea, when he's burning down fields, burning down homes, tearing up railroad ties. What is that doing. That's starving the civilian population to death because there was going to be no middle ground. It was a war of conquest, the North coming into the South and saying we will rule you, and they did. And the only other war of conquest that I can really think of we've ever fought was World War Two.

We fought it as if it was a war of conquest, of course, and then we promptly handed pretty much everything right back to them. But that's what a war of conquest looks like, Like what we did with Japan. We'll bomb all your cities to powder, and then we'll send a million man unit in and we'll kill anybody who gets in our way. But the United States of America doesn't really do that, you see, without an excuse, without a huge reason, I don't want to say excuse like

Pearl Harbor or something like that, we don't do it. Look, if you wanted to win the Vietnam War, you could have won it. All those brave men who fought over there, you could have won it. We had the troops for it, we had the studs for it, we had the equipment for it. You could have just invaded the North period enough of these kid games. Let's invade the North. We'll put Sigon, We'll put Saigon under a mountain of rubble. We'll level your entire country. It's all ours now. In fact,

it's the fifty first state. We could have done that. But what you can't do is half conquest, and that's what we tried. Hey, Jesse, these reporters are pestering Tom home and every chance they get. Are they not essentially asking him to break the law. No, what they're essentially doing is they're trying to protect a central plank of American communism, and that is the unending importation of foreign barbarians, which guarantees the crushing of the country.

Speaker 1

So Tom Holman's doing very well.

Speaker 7

You're treating migrants humanely, but there's been reports of them on planes with no water complaining bunch of crab?

Speaker 1

Would you mean a bunch of crap?

Speaker 6

Heist intensive facilities aid, highest tensive standards in the industry, the order wan force loss this country. There's not okay an entrance country league, it's a crime. And when you cause the crisis big as a bidy administration cause when you overwhelm the bard Joe. But they can't do their national security job. That's when the fatanyl come across kill at quarter main Americans. That's when you have a six hundred percent increase in sex trafficking. That's who you have

a record number of. Nor inspectatoris coming across an open border, present junction, securitive borders promised to American people who are going to force immigation loss. That's what we're going to do without apology.

Speaker 1

We're on board.

Speaker 6

We don't go forward. You We'll see you get a he a lot bigger in their future.

Speaker 2

The media sees themselves as the sword and shield protecting Western communism and ensuring it gets ingrained everywhere. That's how these people see themselves. They see themselves as warriors. We mock them as journalists losers.

Speaker 1

But you know what, Jim.

Speaker 2

Acosta is a great example. Jim Acosta was offered the midnight slot on CNN, which is a huge demotion money wise, prestige wise, and otherwise, and the instead just chose to quit. Listen to this person's sign off, Listen to how this person sees himself.

Speaker 7

It is never a good time to bow down to a tyrant. I've always believed it's the job of the press to hold power to account. I've always tried to do that here at CNN, and I plan on going doing all of that in the future. One final message, don't give into the lies, don't give into the fear. Hold on to the truth and to hope. Even if you have to get out your phone record that message. I will not give into the lies.

Speaker 2

This is a human being. Maybe you're screaming at the radio. He's lying about everything forever. Yeah, but he's a soldier, you see, He's fighting revolution.

Speaker 1

That's how he sees himself. This has been a podcast from wor

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android
Open in Metacast