Institutional trust

lasting long term power? So let me explain the difference. Let's say I am. I am in charge of the police department. I'm the police chief. Small town, pretty small town. We're in West Virginia. We're in rural West Virginia, and it's a twenty person police department. I take over. I'm the police chief. I am an evil, corrupt human being.

Now I use my position as police chief to fill up my twenty person police department with other evil, corrupt people, and we will deal drugs, we'll commit murders, we'll do whatever with the authority of the police department. In fact, if you because you're a part of my town, if you make me angry, if I decide I want you out of the way, maybe you witnessed me commit a crime, I have the power to gather my men, my guns, and myself and come out to your home and kill you,

arrest you, shoot. You say, that's short term power. I have that, but that's not long lasting, tangible power. And here's what I mean. If I do that once twice, ten times, how many times do me and my officers, how many times do we have to commit a crime or do some kind of horribly corrupt thing until the people of my community decide they no longer trust me,

they have declared me to be the enemy. And at some point in time, I hop in a car with five of my other cops and we drive out to a home to commit a crime, and we get ambushed and murdered by the people of the town. At some point it will happen. These things don't happen without end. Now, why why did I end up dying in losing my power because I lost the trust of the people, and that that is long term, lasting institutional power. And that's

the most important kind of power. I realized. For the individual you when I showed up to murder you, none of the long term stuff matters because you're going to die in the short term. But on a long term scale, on a thirty thousand foot view scale, what matters for the institution. For my police department, the most important thing is that the people trust it and rely on it. If I have that, the police department will have power forever.

If I violate that, if I lose that, the people will take their trust away and my least department in the end will be completely powerless at some point in time, no matter how long that takes. Maybe it's twenty years, thirty years, but it will happen. I saw this woman. She is affectionately known on this show as doctor Witch, but her name is actually doctor Wynn. She used to be in charge of Planned Parenthood. She now is obviously a contributor to CNN. She goes on there to talk

about medical things. She goes on there to lie because it's CNN. She was ranting and raving about RFK Junior in some of the things he's doing. Here's what she said.

it's the CDC. So twenty fifteen, Jesse did very much trust organizations like the CDC. Now twenty twenty five. Jesse when the CDC is brought up, scoff and rolls his eyes. In fact, I'm looking at a headline here, I'll tell you immediately the fellows put it in front of me, Chris, Jewish producer Chris and producer Core. They put it in front of me. I read it and I physically rolled my eyes immediately. You want to know the headline new

Chinese COVID strain spreads to the US. Immediately, I went from here we go again, Well, why it's only been ten years. I don't know. Maybe we should go back to this little flashback from that same doctor doctor which during COVID.

outside paddle boarding by himself. And you did all this, all this using medical expertise as your shield, and you did it as if that trust would be endless, and now you're finding out it's not. It's finite. We were talking about Harvard earlier in the show, Harvard this and Harvard that and Harvard this.

Harvard is finding out what the FBI found out, what the medical establishment has found out, what the media has found out. They're all finding out what Jesse tried to warn everybody about years ago. Trust is necessary, and trust is not an infinite supply. You violated enough times, people will move on, and from there you'll discover that the only true power you had, long lasting power, was the

trust they gave you, the legitimacy they gave you. Once they remove it, it's gone and almost impossible to get back. I'm going to expand on that just a little bit more in a second hand a Jesse Kelly show on a Fantastic Thursday. We have Brandon Wiker coming up about ten minutes from now to do all kinds of foreign policy nerd out things. But right now we're having another talk about trust, and I want to be totally upfront

and honest and crystal clear about this. It's really important that we have institutions we can trust and do trust. I don't celebrate where we are, and you shouldn't either. It's a picture a home with bad parents in it, and there's a child in the home. Mom says, hey, I'm gonna make you dinner tonight so you don't go hungry, and then mom just gets drunk and passes out on

the on the couch and doesn't make dinner. And the next night she tells that little boy, she tells that little girl, I'm gonna make you dinner tonight so you don't go hungry, And she gets drunk and passes out on the couch and doesn't make dinner. And this happens over and over and over and over and over again. Well, at some point in time, that child is not going to trust her anymore, not going to believe her anymore. When Mom says anything dinner, what else doesn't matter, the trust will be gone.

with citizens in their institutions. I want you to know that none of this is normal, and none of this is okay. You should have a medical establishment. You can trust, you don't, and so you shouldn't trust them, but you don't. And that Look, we'll focus on medical because that's what we were talking about, doctor Witch. Here, let me be honest with you about something in my own life, totally honest with you. Why do I talk so much about

natural things now, natural solutions, naturalness. You've heard me rant about big pharma. You've heard me rant about the medical establishment. Why, well, they have violated my trust and now I have to look elsewhere. Now do you want to know why? Do you want to know the real reason why? I mean, I've told you real reasons before, But why is it? What chalk is a great example. Why do I love chalk so much? Well, the way I look at Chok Chok's natural herbal supplements. Obviously, the way I look at

chalk is chalk keeps me away from the doctor. That is my goal. And you know what I hate that. I actually wish I had a medical establishment that I trusted for everything, a doctor I trusted so much. Every month, every two months, I go check in with the doc. Doc, this is what's going on, this and that. But now don't don't have any of that at all. I Well, you know what I take. I take a male vitality

stack from chalk every day. I take that not only because it makes me feel better, because I feel like I'm preventing myself from ever having to go to the doctor. I check in with the doctor's office when I want blood work done, and then not at all because I have taken my trust away and I don't celebrate that. I do celebrate chalk, and I thank them for it, but that's not what I want. I would like to have chalk and a doctor. Now I just have chalk.

people we've celebrated. They're out there talking on the news and talking about this, and they want to do this and they want to accomplish that. And we're gonna well for instance, Dan Bongino went on Fox News this morning said this.

Once that gets done and that gets out there and you read some of the stuff we found that, by the way, was not processed through the normal procedure digitizing it, putting in FBI records. We found it in bags hiding under Jim call. Yeah, you're going to be stuff.

don't think I'm just saying it to you. I've told him I don't think he can do what he wants to do, reform the FBI, fixed the FBI. I don't believe it can be done, and not only just because of the poison inside of the building. By the way, why haven't the whistleblower has been brought back. That's a whole other story entirely, not just because of the poison inside of the building. I don't think you could do it because the public has already left. Remember was the

last time we brought up a public poll. I don't remember the last time it was about the public's view of the FBI. You lost him. Now it wasn't obviously Cash and Dan. It lost them, but the FBI as an organization gone completely gone. Elections are another great example. It's really really important for you and me to live in a country where you can trust elections, that they're honest, that they're on the up and up, that every vote

will be counted. Twenty twenty that went away, And it doesn't matter how many Democrats you send to the news to say it was the freest and fairest election ever. All that does now is cement in people's minds that you did something dirty. That's all that does now. Now that you've lost that trust, where are we puts us in a terrible place as a country, just like the kid whose mom didn't make dinner. All right, we're moving

off for that. I won't talk about it anymore. I'm going to talk to Brandon Wikert.

stuff and why Trump is scolding Benjamin Nett and Yahoo. Basically, I want to know why we're hearing things like this every day.

Putin's helicopter. We know that our intel people have been helping since at least twenty twenty three serving as targeting analysts for the Ukrainians when they were firing these long range missiles into Russia. We were helping them target so that they'd be more precise. We also know that the intel community has for the last two years claimed they know where Putin is at all times and they can take him out whenever they want, if it ever came

to that. Well, I think that this was not actually Ukraine they pulled the trigger, But I think this was as an assassination attempt against Putin by a rogue element within our intelligence community. And I say that because Trump he came out on Monday, I think it was Monday or Tuesday, and he was scolding Putin as you as you noted. But then yesterday he came out and gave a brief statement in which he said, I was just told about an assassination attempt, and maybe that's why Putin

is behaving the way he has been. Well, in my opinion, why wasn't Trump, or my question is, why wasn't Trump briefed immediately about this potential assassination attempt? And I think that's to tell that there was a rogue element going you know, trying to manipulate things by getting rid of Putin in the middle of this a very important negotiation. They don't want negotiations, Jesse, they want war.

going on. Yes, I know it was going on during the Biden regime though.

And so I believe that that's why we were being used for targeting assistance.

those surveillance systems. While they're essential for US, they're also very easy to take out with anti satellite weapons, which is what China and Russia have been developing for the last fifteen years, very effective capabilities to render US deaf, dumb, and blind in space. But until that happens, we still have the lead with these surveillance and communication capabilities.

to the fire. But ultimately, Trump bottom line, wants to get a better working relationship with Russia. He rightly recognizes that Russia is a much more integral player deal politically than Ukraine will ever be, and so he is going to go do the negotiation show for a little bit. He knows he's gotten a losing hand. He's going to eventually drop Ukraine like a hot potato. Tell the Europeans

tag you're it, don't include us anymore. That he's going to pivot and try to do direct deals with the Russians on a coterie of other more important issues, ranging from rare earth mineral development in Russia to Putin. A few weeks ago, positive that Elon Muskin him are talking about doing a joint American Russian manned program to Mars in the next year or two. That's something they're wanting to try, maybe doing together Russia in SpaceX. So you know,

we're moving beyond Ukraine. I think you're right. I think that Trump will ultimately just drop Ukraine and tag you're at Europe.

the world are cutting them off. If we start getting more friendly with Russia, where does that leave China.

Reagan to ultimately defeat the Communists. The Soviet Union without fire or shop. Whether that's possible, it's a little bit different now, I don't know, but I do think at the very least, we can nudge Russia away from its total commitment to China. Ultimately, Russia is aware, they're keenly

aware that China views them as a junior partner. And I can assure you that Vladimir Putin does not view himself as a junior partner to anybody, and at some point he's not going to want to be treated that way, either certainly publicly or even behind closed doors. Eventually, the limits to that supposedly limitless friendship he has with g will be tested, especially as Trump offers a lot of you know, tasty carrots, you know, come work with us instead.

We're still a much better market than his China, and I think that Putin is looking for a better deal. We just got to be willing to offer.

family vacation, the wedding. Tonight might be the night that goes bye bye, one flood, one fire, little wire that's wrong, it's going hey wire in your attic right now, and that wedding album is gone. Doesn't have to be that way. It doesn't have to be that way. You can digitize all those things with Legacy Box. They'll send them all back to you. They'll send you a box. You put them in a box, You send it to Legacy Box, an American company, You send it to Tennessee. It's not

some big machine. They will hand digitize your stuff, send it all back and then fireflood time, nothing will destroy those memories. Sound like a plan. You want a nice deal on it, Go to legacybox dot com slash Jesse for an exclusive offer. Legacy box dot com slash Jesse, We'll be back. Is the Jesse Kelly Show a fantastic Thursday, reminding you that tomorrow's ask doctor Jesse Friday. You need to get your question estions emailed in now to Jesse

at Jesse kellyshow dot com. We are back with Brandon Wikert, national security expert. You need to go buy his books and you'll learn a lot more than you will in school. Okay, Brandon. Donald Trump is famously close with Israel. As you and I've talked about this before. We've talked about it on the air before. This is as vocal as I've ever heard him separate from them when it comes to Iran. He's talking about net and Yaku. He told him to

back off. He told what's going on here? What does Trump want out of this deal?

can't do that. If Iran is blowing up the place or threatening to blow up the place, I'm sorry Israel. If Israel is threatening to blow up the place, which Israel threatening to do. And so you know, Trump has asked politely net Yahu, you know, just keep your powder dry. Let's just see where the negotiations going after that will reassess. But net Nyahu cannot do that. And I think this is partly because Netanyahu is politically his survival is on

the line. Let's face it, he missed key indicators and warnings as Prime minister of the impending Hamas attack on ten to seven. He knows that at some point the Israeli Parliament, thaness and Israeli security is going to do an after action, a thorough after action report, and eventually he will be blamed on some level, because the buck ultimately stops with him. He will be blamed for those failures on that day, and he likely will lose his

next his political future. Furthermore, he was under all these criminal investigations before ten seven, and all that sort of evaporated into the ether when he became a wartime prime minister.

And this is why I think on some levels, cynically he's opened up multiple fronts against these different countries, saying it's part of the ten to seven response, but really I think it was because he was just trying to double down to prevent the ultimate reckoning that he was going to have to face four mistakes he made as Prime minister. So some of this is self interest on his part, but ultimately he is not interested in seeing the Trump administration even try to negotiate. We don't know

if this is going to work out. I'm skeptical because of how the Iranian regime is, but at the same time, Trump is probably the greatest dealmaker in history. So why don't we let the man work and see what happens, you know, before we just write it off. There's absolutely no reason to rush into what will be another regional war that could trigger a third World War in the Middle East.

into your country. So without being King Sinek Jesse. How's that possible.

more comprehensive threat. But when it came to Hamas, particularly under Netanyahu, there was the policy they nicknamed it mowing the grass, which is basically, every so often the Israelis would come in and sort of knock out a handful of targets in the Gaza strip and sort of keep

the As threat under wraps. What people didn't realize is under the table the Israeli government, Netanyahu's government, was quietly paying off Hamas to basically not attack, to keep things quiet as best as possible, so that Netanyahu could have a kind of clear playing field at home in Israel. But what nobody seemed to realize is that they thought they were buying loyalty from these Maas leaders, or at

least buying their cooperation. In fact, those Hamas leaders who are committed to the destruction of Israel were taking that money and using it to rebuild their war machine that we saw come on display on ten to seven. On some level, the Israeli military, the Israeli intelligence services were both complacent about the threat from Hamas, and they were very arrogant. They didn't actually think Hamas was the real threat. They thought Hesbla, they thought Youron. They didn't think Hamas

was significant of a threat. They were proven wrong. And I think you saw that. There's obviously more conspiratorial things stand down orders for instance, And why wasn't net Yahoo more on this given the size of the attack, et cetera, et cetera. I will leave that to you know, a different day to talk about, but I certainly have theories on that. But basically, I do think a key component of this was complacency plus arrogance about the Hamas threat

on the part of the Israeli security services. There's also a chance, given what we know about what was going on with Netanya, who's legal issues. You know, the same kind of lawfare used against Donald Trump last year was used against Netan Yahoo by the Israeli version of the FBI,

the shin Bet. There is a chance that they didn't brief Netan Yahoo fully on the threat and he didn't take action because he wasn't brief fully, and it might have been part of a kind of a deep state conspiracy to make met Yahoo complacent so that they could then tend this on him down the line and get him out, because we know the Israeli deep state does not like nets in Yahoo.

is complicated. As I've always said, with the exception of chicken hawks, I have open ears for all of it. I'll listen to any of it.