WW2, Fabian Socialism & The Technocratic Trap: Nephilim Death Squad with Jay Dyer

hang before we get into today's show. A little reminder, sometime around the half an hour more, we're going live exclusively to Patreon dot com Forward slash Nephilim Death Squad. Sign up there. Good news, guys, we've got all the hiccups ironed out. Vinnie Pella everything he gets down, everything's good man, everything's golden. Uh, Vinnie Paz could not keep down and uh and we're coming for you.

last five or six years. I don't know if I will be able to keep doing that, but I'm all about geopolitics, comedy, philosophy, film, and that's what I'm all.

so they didn't even look at it. But it did at least make it that far up. But people think that it's like, oh, how come it's not shut down yet? Well, court cases take years, so that's one. Right.

you can't stop Alex. You could take away his stuff, and you could take away maybe the area that he does it in and YadA YadA, but you can't stop Alex Jones.

little bit? What's going on? Why are we talking about Hitler? Why are people suddenly thinking that he's based.

Probably a lot of meme warfare and then the relaxing of the algorithm in the last couple of years, to a degree which seems to be very selective, has allowed for people to start uploading old speeches, et cetera from Hitler and Ai speeches and all this, and so these reels and clips are just going to kind of going crazy. One reason for it is also the obvious point that, you know, Zionism has a huge level of control over

our government, lobby apack all that. So that's there's some truth to the lockdown, the censorship, you know, the things you can't talk about. But then what happens is that people tend to then think, oh, if I've been lied to, then everything's a lie, right, Oh everything is an illusion, everything's and so they get into these sort of really

extreme polar opposition positions. And that's that's a tactic that I think the establishment knows that humans are kind of creatures of extreme so they'll go to the opposite pendlum swing and then they'll adopt, Oh, if Zionism is, you know, has a huge influence in our government, then the polar

opposite must be this solution. And there's a lot of different nuanced, you know, points and takes that qualify a lot of this, and we're going to talk about that I'm sure, but those are the reasons that I think is popular. And then also I would be suspicious of Silicon Valley suddenly allowing these things. And the after narrative is, oh, well, they couldn't stop us. We broke containment. It's like, I mean, they still censor people. So I'm not sure why you

think that it's breaking containment. I would be very suspicious that, especially since all the people who are the Silicon Valley elites that are subservient to people in the Middle East. Are they really just allowing this because they can't stop it, or are they perhaps allowing it for a certain reason, And that's my concern. I don't know that for sure.

I'm speculating. You know, we had NAPO cybercom operations running wild in twenty twenty when the Russian you know, Ukraine conflict kicked off and that kind of died down, So this might be a new angle on the NAPO operation if you're familiar with that.

whatever conclusion we are supposed to end up at. And when you do your research, I don't want to like bury the lead know this, but when you check out the Nazis and you see what they were into, and you see how they were incorporated in this government, all the esoteric things that they were researching and developing, and then you also look at the concerted effort of the

left to kind of make they've made Nazis. They made saying that Nazism is bad almost like synonymous with the way that they've made the Bible look corny.

your booze. I've seen what's what makes you clap? And the Left, who's become so despised, and you know by the other side calls you a na see it's almost like a badge of honor. Now, so there's a lot of like cultural priming that led us to this. And I agree with what Jay, what you're saying, this idea of like, you know, the algorithms kind of softening.

can hate the j's which way western man? And Elon Musk actually comments on that post and he goes, wow, is mel Gibson really that of these days? Now what we're led to believe? And that turns into a whole debacle. They write articles. Elon actually removes his own comment from that, but it was this really early signifier in my opinion that like, hey, we're allowed to talk like this.

This was about twenty twelve, thirteen, somewhere in there fourteen U was so they wanted to actually track what people are saying online about this idea of you know, civil unrest and government reaction programs and drills that were being done across multiple states for the possibility of like a civil war imminent collapse. And of course all the you know patriotard crowd thought, oh do they're coming. They're gonna

put us in the un camps. And really all it was was tracking and seeing what the reactions of people were online in mass So you have to understand that the military de Pentagon, they watch and study all this very intently. And I don't think that you know, anybody at that Silicon Valley level, they're not disconnected from that Pentagon you know cybercom establishment. They're all tied into the

same DARPA style, you know, anessay style networks. Now, granted, there's probably a lot of people in those agencies that would agree and are opposed to the corruption of our system, but you still just can't trust these people. You know, all these Silicon value leade people are pretty much known for being very backstabby and very They'll ride the waves, you know what I mean, They'll ride trends, and that doesn't really tell us that that they're genuine. They're just

kind of riding waves. But the other thing I'll say on that too, is that the meaning which had been studied at a very high level. There's a old there was a study down like ten years ago at GHQ, which is the British version of the NSA, and they did a study on meme magic, talking about how you can speak to the collective unconscious through these archetypal imagery

symbols and whatnot. That's kind of a big part of what changing images a Man actually talks about in the later the later chapters is engineering and co opting cultural memes and archetypes and retooling them to give man a new world, you in a new paradigm. And so the reason I say that is that when you talk about Hitler the meme. Now, according to many of the guys that called in, we did probably I don't know, fifteen hours of calling spaces on this in the last several

weeks and just call her after caller. Many of them note that the history doesn't even matter to them. It's just totally a symple divorce from the reality. Remember the Sam Hide meme. You know that Sam Hyde has done all the mass casualty events and people ask them about that, and he's like, yeah, well, the meme actually took on a life of its own. It's like it's not even

connected to me anymore. And in the same way, it's a postmodern attitude to where you take a meme, divorce it from its history and kind of give it your own narrative of your own story. So it's a postmodern will to power situation, which actually fits perfectly with Nazism. That's what Alfred Rosenberg did when he crafted the narrative of the Reich. He just kind of made it up wholesale and came up with these ideas like positive Christianity, which would get rid of all the Old Testament elements.

It would be a kind of a gnostic Marcian Knight version of Christianity for the Reich. So that's what they're doing. The same thing that Rosenberg did today is tiny mustache moun followers.

you've said. And here in Florida, you know, we had DeSantis passing anti Semitism laws and all these other things. But then there's this other side of me that looks and goes, I think the Nazi sympathizing is really the point, and that this doesn't end, you know, with a persecution of people who are any Semitic ideology, but that this ends in this resurrection in some way, shape or form

of a modern day Nazi movement. And the reason that I think that it's interesting that you just said what you did because I look at Operation paper Clip, and I look at this time frame of like the late forties early fifties as being the epicenter for the development of so many programs that are prevalent today prevalent today, and we're seeing kind of the fruits.

forty seven, forty eight, and the implementation of it. All this stuff is happening right now. So I'm like, is are we like fulfilling the Nazi age? Because have these guys ever left? Have they been that deeply entrenched in our shadow government?

and super maxis and whatnot. I did a lot of podcasts with Sewan Attwood over the years, and he's always telling his Arizona prison stories. Who've done Sammy the Bull interviews and he's got a bunch of those two. They talk about how it's very segregated and controlled in that way when you kind of divide everybody up into the sort of tribal camps. And I'm not saying that people can have a concern for their ethnicity and their people groups.

That's healthy and that's natural. People should be self determining. The problem is that when you do this in a polarizing, extreme way, you can use this as a technique to break down and destroy civilization. So I think that's the unfortunate situation that we're at which they put all these pressures on the system of purpose to foment civil unrast with the Podesta Plan and with you know, shutting off my EBT snap cards that kind of stuff, which I'm

going to be out. We'll be out in the streets next week, Dough.

eugenics policy. And I think you could look at this as an example that because all the all the people in this book, the writers of this they're very influenced by Madam Wilvatsi's theosophy, and her theosophy was influential on a lot of the SS, you know Reich type leaders like Himler. She talks about the root races and the next you know, instantiation of an empire, that would be the next root race that would have that would evolve.

And they kind of co opted that and said, oh, that's the Teutonic Knights, you know, the Germanic Teutonic Knights. And that's where you get into the cult side of this, which you mentioned Berner von Braun I think, and paper Clip and some of those guys were into the occult. But you know, Himmler exploed thought he could do this sort of ritual re enactment at different castles and Germany. So he actually wasn't a cultist. I don't know that they all were. And I'm not really seeing any signific

evidence that Hitler himself wasn't a cultist. There there might be evidence of that, but I mean there's enough in mind comf if you've read it that like, obviously it's not Christian, that should be obvious.

in really terrible things. Do you think that the suppression of that natural urge, that natural inclination was organic, Because whether or not it was organic or orchestrated, we certainly did go through that, right, Like let's say, white people for example, it is you can't express any sort of like white power or white alignment. It's very problematic to

do that. It's okay for other races to do that, but then you see this sort of weaponization against white people where it's like white people cannot be the recipients or the victims of racism, let's say, and they change

the definitions of racism. There's a lot of changing the definitions, changing the language around things in order to justify and also, I think, make it so that a baseline station about the fundamentals that we're operating in can't happen if you change the definitions of everything that we simply can't have a discussion because now we're just arguing about what these words mean at their root. So from my perspective, it looks like that was part of this. You had to

go through that in order to get to this. What do you think, Jay, Is that an organic thing or is this just a byproduct? Is this a byproduct of an organic event? Or was that an orchestrated thing?

they have for us in all the West. And that includes the web of mass migration, you know, open demographic warfare side of it, which proves partly what you're arguing here, what you're asking about. The demographic warfare is one hund percent real. Clergy's book says that we will basically create a giant, homunculous blob of people and only there will only be a has he put it a Middle Eastern people's supremacy. He says that in the book. Yeah, so

that was presented. They said, yeah, we'll go with this plan. They combined it with other sort of more Fabian socialist models of how to integrate the West. And so you have to understand Fabian socialism in tandem with this, because all the Fabian socials elites said, we've got to get rid of the Western white male, especially the Christian white male.

He's the number one enemy. Bernard Shaw, you know, bertrand Russell, they all said this, and they said for the UK and Europe import Islam, for the US import you know, from south of the border. So they're very explicit. When you read these texts. You're not supposed to read these sections. I'm supposed to talk about these texts. They're all public, they're all you can find the PDFs on you know, archive dot org. So it's all very real. That's one side of it. And then you're talking about, you know,

to what degree, all that was organic? It was one percent plan and strategized to inculcate critical race theory. DEI all the anti white stuff throughout university, throughout the education. So in fact, I was told in grad school because I wanted to go on and get my PhD. At my one of my graduate advisors, my history professor advisor, said I'm going to just go ahead and tell you that you're a straight white male, you're not gonna be welcomed in graduate academia.

which is what I was studying in literature and history. Uh. No, of course they don't. They're very explicit about that. So he himself was a a white male, I don't think. I'm not sure it was actually straight. So might that might have been why? That might have been why he was able to get his pH d. He had to, you know, touch a few butts or something.

But it's not just a CIA. But you know, they just recently admitted very openly, very candidly that Jolani was an ally to the CIA and Timber Sycamore especially all the way up until the overthrow of Asad. That was all done at the behest of the CIA and Massade working in tandem, and they welcomed Jilani formerly head of

al Qaeda or al Nusra in Syria. Now he's a hero again, going back to that long term partnership between the Mujahidin and the CIA that's still in play today, and it's very transparent when you actually kind of read about it. So on the one hand, I can be nuanced to say, no, I don't accept the official story of the Big Nine event and what we were told

about the threat of Islam was a lie. However, the mass importation of these people is the real story, that's the real threat, not because of supposed terror cells everywhere, but because of the demographic warfare and the Islamic stuff was more pronounced in the UK and Europe than it is here. And I've I've been to London. I've seen

it firsthand. Like my wife went to London in two thousand and like three or four, and then we went and I gave a lecture in twenty nineteen and she was describing just how radically, you know, Islama sized it was. So I don't think it's so much the threat of the you know, bombs going off or whatever, and a lot of those are provocateurd you know, entrapment operation, especially like the you know Christmas bomber or the shoe bomber all that stuff, So that is a controlled narrative, I think.

But the real concern is the demographic replacement. And although as I said, that was primarily Islam in the UK and in Europe, well, I'm starting to see more and more Islamic replacement and importation in the West. For example, in Nashville we had a huge importation of Somali's and Muslims in the last ten years, which never even seen

that in Nashville before. Now you see mocks mosques everywhere going up, and you can look into Saudi Arabia, Saudi Arabia in the last This is in Max Lumenthal's book, who's a big critic of the official narratives, and he's a socialist, so I have plenty of criticisms of him. But his book on the Real Use of Islam in the West is pretty good management of savagery, at least

the first half of the book's really good. But he points out that the last twenty years, the Saudis have put billions, something like tens of billions of dollars into Islamic centers. Is on education and building mosques throughout America. That's all by designers. When you see these blonde chick influencers constantly talking about the Kouran dude, that's all paid for. I'm convinced of that. So it's a real thing. But it's not the terror thing like they say. But it's

a demographic thing. That's my take on it. And everybody has to read the Milner Fabian Conspiracy book. It's it's so good because it's not just about well you will talk about you just talk about the Fabians. No, it's all the same thing and they work together with the anti white crowd because all the Fabians were anti white and utopian socialism that Moses has is the father of. It's the same thing as Fabian socialis. They're the same.

It's the same as Bolshevism. It's just different strategies about how to roll it out. So and they're very candid about how to use Islam as a tool. Many people call it the broom of Zionism or the broom of Judaism, and that's the best way to put it. And they're both tell mudik. If you watch my long talk with the Hodge twins. As soon as I got there, they were like, you think. I'm like, no, it's not beaze. We thought a child brides. How's that, babe? You don't think. You don't think.

my mistake. I want to talk about this idea a little bit about the Southern border, the poorest southern border, the legislation that got us there, but I think the sort of the cultural leveraging that got us or the

cultural manipulation. It seems to me like we were kind of dog walked down this path to create this poorest southern border situation so that it could result in exactly what you're describing here, Jay, And now we find ourselves in this place where it's not even just the left, Like a lot of people are really upset about the whole ice thing and people getting.

here in the first place. They manipulated low information, high emotion voters into voting for the very scenario that we find ourselves in. Is this what happened? And does this look? It looks to me like it does play directly into what you're describing.

in the day. I remember like twenty fourteen, we were write fifteen, were writing articles about Dusty Boy, and that was this picture of a dusty boy child that had dust all over him, and Asad had done this to his own people, and all that was just fake guys propaganda. So yeah, man, that's how it works. It's it's once she's anytime you see that kind of child propaganda all

on now. And they remember they did the same thing with Greta, right, they rolled Greta out as like we must all listen to the child, you know when she's.

logic and things of that nature. Women are typically emotional, empathetic and nurturing, right, And so when you have all of these these these women voting, and you wonder, well, who are these low information, high emotion voters the ones that are susceptible to narratives, children in cages and separating mothers from children at the border and things like that. Am I wrong in saying that it is predominantly women, male feminists and women who are who are falling for this.

get some of these cities under martial law. Who knows what we'll see. But this is like you have mass amounts of military aged men who are displaced, who have no jobs. Many of them are saying things like we were promised jobs and homes if we came over here.

it's gonna be messy. It's not gonna be like this clean like people, good people, normal people are gonna get wrapped up in this and it's going to be horrifying. But it's like I don't see that they need to go. They need to go, so I don't know this whole repeal the nineteenth thing. It's like if they're so easily manipulated, should they be able to vote?

feel bad about being boys. All of that's part of this plan to allow the country to move into this sort of quasi socialist or socialist technocratic scenario. So the more that you can get people thinking that they're going to be on the dole with the universal basic income, which is like one hundred year old plan, you know a cu Wells writes about the version Russell wrote about it. You've got technocrats hundred years ago saying that that's the plan.

I think a good scenario for that is an economic collapse. Right, But you're right too that when you bring all these people in with all these promises and then there's nothing that's a recipe for planned you know, agitation and civil unrest. And I think that the more they try to polarize people with a lot of this propaganda, I think what they want is an eventual clash of some kind and

then perhaps the disintegration of the West. A lot of books, a lot of writers have been saying that because you've got to get rid of the existing system to bring in the new system, and the best way that they typically do that is they're blowing up the old system. How exactly that will happen, I don't know. I know the dollar will eventually die. I don't think there's anything behind the fiat currency that's going to eventually just windle away.

All the currencies eventually die. So you combine economic with the cultural chaos, with the importation of all these you know, people that don't integrate, whatever that means, it's a recipe for collapse in disaster. And what was it that last question was about, Oh that the women voting, I mean voting right voting is itself as a scam and it always has been in my view, So I don't really think that. I think that's more of a politicized issue that people think they have this right, and that they

have all this power through voting. I think only at a local level to voting actually do anything. So although I do not think that even I mean, if that's the origins of feminism is suffrage, you know, the whole feminist movement comes out of that. So the whole idea itself is kind of retarded because women aren't meant to be primarily involved in the political and economic business sphere.

That doesn't mean they can't have their own you know, side mom hustles or whatever, but like proverbs thirty one woman, okay, yeah, but like that's not everybody being a boss bitch ceo, right, That's that's it.

the whole thing. They did a study on. In societies based around emotions and egalitarian and egalitarianism or equalitarianism, what happens is it eventually becomes obsessed with everybody having to feel good, and so the only thing that gets promoted or only the only thing that gets people ahead is that people who can capitalize on being oppressed. And that's why this whole system is focused around oppression dynamics and whoever can prove or try to argue or pretend to

be the most oppressed and changing images. A man, for example, says we're going to raise women to all these positions of power, not because they care about women, but because it will be a better means of moving the society into this socialist shithole that we're going into. And so they intentionally raise the minorities, and women are part of the minorities. That also is all the other you know flavors of the rainbow people groups that are out there.

They raise them and give them a narrative. And what happens in that scenario isn't that everybody gets like built

up in some sort of equalitarian stuff. What happens is that the most cunning people that are narcissistic, psychopathic creeps that hence the dark triad traits, they actually figure out how to capitalize on the oppression dynamic and they like compete to be the most oppressed to get the most social tension, you know, social traction, energy, et cetera, focus, attention, and money, and it actually hurts the people who are actually oppressed. So it's a total like nightmare scam system.

And when you look back at like the you know, Bolshevik or the Soviet or the communist regimes, it's exactly how they function. So they function the exact same way, and you have to keep in mind that whether it's voting or any of the stuff, Like the CIA has mastered regime change in other countries, they know absolutely perfectly how to target through stages of revolution. You can look at something like Great Palace is a famous classic piece

on the IMF shot Doctor of the IMF Revolution. How they stage these The bankers know how to stage these in phases, and rigging the voting, for example, is part of how they do that in other countries. They started all the way back and you know the removal of Mozedic. Howd Of did a whole podcast in the CIA operations in Iran to remove Mosdic with the shy end and it includes manipulating the voting system so voting can be

integrated into this overall color revolution regime change operation. And I think I don't know exactly how they're going to do it, but I think in the US we are in a slower roll out of a regime change operation. I don't mean to get rid of Trump. I'm talking about like to totally change the country.

pay attention to these things. And when I'm I think my mom was like, well, Trump is so bad, and I'm like I gotta like kind of defend or at least give arguments for like something about this, like why you're wrong from a like a correct standpoint. And I'm I can't even really remember the last like past, the last six months because it's been such a weird slow boil of event after event. Yeah that it's like there are so many things, so much proof in front of

your face. If you don't see it now, I don't even know how to play these events together for you. They've done a masterful job of creating like these separate realities, you know, the sort of like you know, little reality echo chambers that you can subscribe to and live in and you can see the world through this lends and and to be fair, you know, to give the other side or whatever other side. But I'm not I don't

believe in you know, aligning yourself along political lines. But if you were to be let's say left is, and you were to look at things through their lens, it can adapt and it can like you know, it would make sense the things around you would make sense through that lens enough that you would feel comfortable staying there. And it's the same thing for the right, Like if you're conservative or anything there and you look through that lens,

it's gonna be the same thing. So they've done a really great job of creating these these sort of like uh silos or or you know, uh little little what would you call it? What do you put sheep into? And echo chambers? Wow, you know where it's like we can It's wild that they've done it to degree that they have. And I agree with you, we are like in what would be I forgot who who coined the term with the idea of like oppression olympics And that's your currency, you know in these in these times, is

how oppressed you are. And I know We've seen a lot of comedy make fun of that sort of thing, but it's true.

says himself. So I bought mine comp I read most of it, a good portion of it. I read all of David Duke's My Awakening, read all of Francis Parker Yaki's Imperium. It's like all seven or pages of that reachishpangl. So I I read a lot of these sort of far right people's and found areas where I agreed and disagreed. But I noticed pretty quickly, even when I was less interested in Christianity back at that time that you know,

there's not really much Christianity in mind. Comp For example, if if you read through it, he will talk about the dangers of international usury, international freemasonry, international Zionism, all those things that I would agree critiquing. But then the solution is we need to revive as kind of a pagan imperium, right, That's ultimately I think what it ends up being. People debate whether Hitler was a agnostic or had some sort of a loose kind of perennialist idea about

who God was, or kind of a syncretist idea. I think if we look at the influences you have Baron von Sebettendorf, the Thule Society, Theosophy, those are all very ateric and sort of gnostic branches of occult philosophy, an Eastern Hindu influence philosophy that had quite a bit of influence on at least we know for sure, like I said, Himler and Rosenberg, but perhaps Hitler as well, because you'll find these elements within mineconference says things like the real

original sin is race mixing, and I mean, whatever you think about that, that's not what original sin is in the Book of Genesis, right. He says things like Christianity is too intolerant of the other religions, for example, pagan religions and pagan altars, and so because it has this desire to get rid of the pagan alters and to set up Christian alters, he says that's too judaic. So there's very much an influence of the higher critical school

of Julius Velhausen and these. You know, I don't know if you know what the documentary hypothesis is, but that's where you get JEPD, which is taught in all the liberal seminaries university, is that the Bible isn't really inspired. It's just kind of written by these different the priests class, the Java's class, the Eloheen class, the deuteronomous class of ancient and so the Bible is all kind of just pieced together varying traditions. There's not a cohesive, single theology

that unites the old New Testament. That higher critical approach of Julius Velhausen. He himself was just a liberal German. He said, we have to get rid of all the judaic elements within Christianity. Well, when you get to Hitler, especially in elements of Minkong, But when you get to Rosenberg, they're very explicit that, yeah, let's purge the Reich's Christianity. We'll have positive Christianity, it'll be amenable to the Reich. We can have some of the Pagans, and you can

have positive Christianity. But whatever is judaic Christianity has to be gotten rid of. But that's really I mean, you can't have Jesus without the Old Testament. You can have you know, he's the Lamb of God. What does that mean? Well, if I don't know what Passover is and Exodus, I'm

not gonna know what the Lamb of God is. So it's an viable of an ancient heresy called Marsianism or gnosticism, which says the God of the Old Testament is this other kind of God, and then Jesus kind of be crafted into a symbol or an image of an amenable philosophy to the Reich. So, as an Orthodox Christian, I don't have a problem with Christian nations and Christian imperium. That's the old Byzantine Orthodox Christian view, but it's not

crafted to biological determinism. And I think That's one of the key elements where I would disagree with that whole perspective is that Hilarianism and the Teutonic perspective or whatever, is this idea that blood and soil is kind of the root of the religion. That's political, but it politicizes the religion to make it a tool of the empire, whereas in Orthodox Christianity, the empire has to confess one faith, and we don't put politics first. We put politics downstream of theology.

he believed that? Like, did he think that?

biblical texts. And they try to come up with this idea in the Christian identity circles, which is a bunch of feds that, oh, when Jesus said, you know you're you're of your father the Devil, that that's an actual literal seed, that that that that Satan spawned his offspring. Who are the moderns and all that, But no, that has nothing to do with it's a spiritual seed. So everybody who's born of Adam is a spiritual son of the Devil. And that's why baptism makes you a son

of God in our view. So you have to be integrated into the Covenant to no longer be a spiritual son of the devil. It's not anything to do with biological offspring per se. But you can find that in Judaic mysticism in terms of Lilith and the Kabbalah. So what Hitler is doing is kind of taking some of the Judaic approaches from the Talman and kind of giving it more of a Teutonic dent of his own. But

I didn't detect anything. And just because Hitler's tolerant of Christianity, you know, in in his book in mind On for whatever, that doesn't mean that he's actually a Christian, you know what I mean. It's like you can have there's plenty plenty of world leaders that are pagans that are tolerant of Christianity. That doesn't make you a Christian. I've never

seen any evidence that he was Catholic. Just because they had certain geopolitical alliances with the papacy for certain specific events, that doesn't mean that he was a Catholic.

that are worshiping them. These are either the fallen ages themselves or you know, disembodied spirits of their offspring or what have you. But they're all alignment with this spirit of rebellion, and so it's it's it's kind of a note Sherlock when you say, like, oh, Christianity isn't tolerant of these pagan ideologies. It's like, yeah, I mean, if you wanted to put it in rudimentary terms, it's because the things that they're worshiping are demonic in their very nature.

Triune God. Jesus says, you know, you baptize the name of the Father's son Holy Spirit. So we would see that as a trinitarian confession, and that's what puts you into covenant with God. You know. Galatians three talks about those that are in Christ are those that are the

seed of Abraham. So the promises to the especially Genesis twelve, fifteen, seventeen twenty two, those Abrahamic covenant promises are expanded to the Gentiles when the Messiah came and instead of circumcision, which was a you know, bloody sort of primitive right, God instituted baptism for the nations because that's a much easier, simpler means of coming into the covenant than just males only being, you know, having their force been removed, which is,

by the way, as a sign of original sin. That's the purpose of its Paul Says and Colossians. The baptism is the reality that replaces the symbology and the typology of that of circumcision. So circumcision was a type. Baptism

is the reality which fulfills the type. So we don't believe that baptism is merely a symbolic ritual, but that it actually affects the thing that is happening, because the Old Testament rituals and rights were symbolic, and the New Testament rights that Jesus institutes actually bring about that change. So that's the orthodox few.

my foreskin that had been rough. So I wonder your thoughts on this, because you know, I have this this theory that a lot of what was happening, the iconography surrounding Hitler in particular, was that of a particular entity, all right, right, and I know, like Hitler was into whatever he was into, and there's all this idea of like, you know, these Germanic tribes, these Germantic pagan tribes, and then Aryans, and if you look at Blavatsky's beliefs on

what Arians were, it gets even stranger, right. I look around at all the iconography surrounding Hitler, and it looks

to be that of specifically Zeus. I mean, you have the Zeppelin Tribune fairgrounds or in Tribune grounds, I think I add the word fair in there where he's giving his speeches from some of his most you know, iconic based Hitler speeches are given from this this fair ground and its designed after the Temple of Zeus that's found in Turkey, Turkey being you know, modern day Turkey being ancient.

The eagle being a it's Zeus. It's like the number one animal. I mean, Zeus transmuted himself into a number of things that I think a goose or a swan was one of them, where he you know, raped some chick as a bird.

guy who is Steveton paganism. I guess the only question would be, is Hitler and unknowing uh participant in this sort of pagan theater that he's surrounded by while his you know, constituents are engaging in all this occult practice, and you know, you have never ending amounts of unconfirmable but still compelling conspiracy theories surrounding right with you know, these vimanas and things of that nature that come from ancient India, and whether or not they have these bell

shaped UFOs, and the list just goes on.

five years. He said, the number one rug associated with displaying signs of schizophrenia, which he has now come to the conclusion, is a spiritual disposition that you're being influenced and oppressed by spirits outside of your own self. He says, methan fetamine is the number one thing that will kick that door open and give those spirits access to you, and it becomes very difficult to close them. So you've got a guy on meth standing at the altar of.

voice of God. He called it providence. And then there's this lore and it's hard to confirm it that kind of builds Hitler up.

not a historian of World War two. I've just read several books on it, and I look at, you know, the ethos of the mythology that Rosenberg crafted, and it's definitely a return to the idea of you know, pagan Rome something like that, and you know, Rome just kind of adopted the same pantheon that the Greeks had, So I could definitely see that, you know, that Zeus element that you talked about, that's definitely definitely there. Zeus obviously

isn't the same as the biblical deity. So once you understand that, you know, Christianity has to be exclusionists because Christ on the way that truth in the life no one comes to the Father but by me, so you can't have you know, like put Francis and Leo say, all the religion and all the past going to take you to the to the One God. And you know Hitler also trying to make alliances with Islam as well.

That if you look up his meetings with a mean Al Hussani, who was the British intelligence operative, that was the Grande Mom of Jerusalem. That was a British spy who was placed there to kind of have this continual backdoor discussion with Hitler throughout these periods, as well as the Royal Society meeting with rib and Tromp consistently throughout throughout that time. Keep in mind too that Bolovatski and Theostry was also promoted by the Rothschilds, right, the Fabian

Society and all that. That's getting a lot of Rothchild money, and that's where you get theosophy. Madame Levavski was a Fabian socialist, so she was talking to a lot of the KGB people like roar Rick and others. She would go and have these meetings with the ascended Masters and all this kind of stuff, which I'm not saying she wasn't contacting demons. But doctor Richard Spence is a really

good historian on a lot of the stuff. And we did an interview on Secret Agent sixty sixty six, which is about Crowley's work with British intelligence, and he wrote another essay about how her ascended masters might have also been her some of her handlers, so spy handlers in other words, So that there's this espionage element that's important to understand as well, because whether it's the Reich, or whether it's the Fabian Socialist or whether it's the Bolsheviks, many of

them were into the occult. Glebe BOKIAI as another famous Bolshevik who was an outright sort of straight up Satanist eyes watch shut kind of guy. He was having eyes whych shut orgies. So that's there's also Pinks. I don't know if you've heard of that book, but that's that's the skittles stuff going on amongst some of the ss.

And I'm like, fun stuff. A lot of what you're saying really interesting, really compelling. I could see what you're talking about. Have you ever considered that they lied to you?

the whole Hitler admiration thing. But at the very least, what you could say is there's been this awareness and this gearing towards the American consciousness towards christ and I think there's some parsing out that needs to be done.

is now, especially after Charlie Kirk's death. So Kirk dies, there's this resurgence of what I can only explain is like Christian nationalism that's kind of like peeking in the forefront. They're doing, you know, their big megachurch thing at his memorial or funeral. At the same time, Nick foent As is sort of taking the he's taking the baton and moving in a different direction of whatever Charlie was doing.

we should be going. And I think a lot of people would be subscribing to this Christian nationalism not out of you know, submission to God and this acceptance of Jesus Christ as their Lord and savior, but instead as a way to stick it to the other side that we've been, you know, and it's been.

It's easy stuff though, but there's a lot of that. It's like now and then and then you get the whole gnostic thing of Jesus was an ascended master.

different seas. If you read Paul's letters to Timothy, talks about laying hands on Timothy passing on the gift of the Holy Spirit, and he tells Timothy not to hastily lay hands on men after him, but to pick good dudes, solid dudes, to pass that that gift onto, much like

you see in numbers eleven. When you know you have Moses laying hands on the elders passing the spirit when you have you know, at the end of Genesis, you know Joseph and the blessing in Genesis, there's this there's this biblical model of the passing on through the laying out of hands of the gift or the inheritance, which in the New Testaments fulfilled in the gift of the

Holy Spirit. So anything that departs from that confession that you see in history, because we think Jesus promised the Holy Spirit to guide the Church and he would never leave it, you know in John fourteen to sixteen. So this, this presence of the Holy Spirit in the life of the church makes the church all so a theandric institution, which just means a god man or the body of the god Man institution. So it's not a social organization,

it's not a political organization. It's something totally unique to history. It's a supernatural organism in our view. And so you know, when you go back to like the Nicene Creed and this kind of stuff, like there's not really any Christianity that departs from that, like it's not Christianity, it's some sort of deviation and all the gnostic stuff, all the sort of neopagan stuff. It's really going against mischaracterizations of what Christianity is. For example with the Hitler stuff. The people.

The reason people are looking to that kind of of a based so called a leader is like, we haven't seen a base leader or what the Christian doctrine of the state actually is in practice in our generation. It doesn't exist. And when you go throughout Church history, you have countless examples of Christian kings who are opposed to Zionism, opposed while Desigonism post a rabbinical teut philosophy who fought Islam, a countless Orthodox Christian kings, especially in Serbia, who went

to battle against Islam. So there is this genuine masculine kingly heroic patriarchal archetype that it still exists all throughout Orthodox iconography, the last of which would be Zar Nicholas, who was murdered by the Bolsheviks in a Talmudic ritual that has been banished, and people don't have any conception

of this. So the deficient nature of Western Christianity for the most part, when it seeks for cultural and political and social solutions, it naturally then wants to gravitate towards the last thing that it thinks or remembers in its cultural memory as so called days, and that would be Tiny Mustache Man. But the reality is that he was brought into power by Western industrial money. They wanted a war.

This war led to the ex the repatriation of to the Middle East by design, and there was an agreement between the Nazis and this called the Havara Agreement, so that Palestine could be set up. And after World War two you wouldn't have the nation state of it if you'd not had Tiny Mustache Man wreaking havoc and killing. By the way, millions and millions of Orthodox Christians and Russian Christians, Polish Christians who were fighting against them, not

because they were just simply communists. They didn't appreciate the attitude that Hitler had, especially towards the Slavs. If you read in mind comp he sees them as lesser people very clearly. So we would say, as Orthodox and any Orthodox Christian saints said that the movement of Napoleon against Russia and Hitler against Russia were actually actions of the

spirit of Antichrist. So just because you're against you can find a Roman emperor who didn't like does that mean that he's good because like, well, I mean, being a Roman emperor and I need to be worshiped and seeing yourself as a sort of a god figure. It doesn't make you necessarily based. I mean, unless you just hate Christianity,

as many of the wig nets do. But I mean, yeah, there's a combination of things there that make it very difficult, and that's why people are turning to this created meme icon which I believe is a replacement for real kingly iconography.

If you look at what I posted on my Twitter the other day, I put two saints, one from the king of Serbia, Saint Stephen, who fought against Muslims, and then another one was the Romanovs who didn't like So you've got these images in our Christian civilization that are opposed to these things. And you can go back to Byzantium. It's the same ideology, the same system, but you're not supposed to talk about any of that. You're only supposed

to talk about I don't know, tiny mustache man or whatever. Yeah, that's it.

Should we be looking to galvanize some sort of a movement that actually is a Christian movement, a Christian nation maybe, like somewhere along the lines of like the guy Joel Webbins seems like the kind of I haven't paid as much as attention to him as I should have, but he seems kind of like be pushing in that direction or justly fa faith based, which I'm definitely I'm not leaning towards it, but I'm trying my best to do that as well.

The Church expands and it is given to the gentiles Matthew twenty one to forty three at the First Advent. So if you look at all the passages in the New test One, it's side Psalm one about the ascension. The ascension is what happened in Acts. That's when he begins his reign and set him a right hand, and I'll make your enemies your footstool. So you're absolutely right about that. Dominion mandate is actually now given to the church. The Church takes dominion by converting the nations. It's not

primarily political. There is a side effect, a down the stream effect of conversion of the empire does eventually affect the politics, and you get Christian law. As Orthodox, we believe that Justin was St. Justinian is a saint, and he put out the Code of Justinian, which is the famous historic Christian law document that makes Christian laws. So all the Orthodox kings that we talked about also had the same modus operuna, the same principle of enacting Christian laws.

But it's it's not that we do politics first. So in our perspective as Orthodox, we believe that as the nation permeates with Christianity, Orthodox Christianity, particular, when it's the majority, they can then begin to pass the Christian laws. Right, you're going to outlaw things like blasphemy, You're not going to have all this nonsense. I believe in Orthodox Christian monarchy that's the best form of government, but that's not

our first priority. Right. The early Church, they didn't go out to try to make sure that Caesar and the senators converted to make to make Rome be Christian. They converted in an organic sort of way, and then eventually it permeated the Empire, and it took a few centuries. And you know in the West and America it's a

similar situation. They were kind of in a pagan society, basically, but through the Internet things like that, we might actually see a quicker type of conversion and permeation of authentic Christianity. It's not going to be this megachurch nonsense, but people are going to be looking for the historic form of Christianity. What was Christianity like for the first thousand years? And I think that's what people find interesting in what we

talk about. I'm not attacking or dissing you guys, or doubting your sincerity or anything like that, but you know, I was Protestant, raised Protestant, and then reading church history and reading the Church Fathers and all that that kind of led me in this direction. So that kind of a Christianity already has a doctrine of the state. And I think what you get with people like Joel Webbin, And I remember I was used to be in a Calvinist church kind of like what Joel Webbin's in, and

we were kind of super caist. I think. So I'm not talking to him, I just think so. I'm not positive, but I think what those kind of groups are kind of searching for, what is the relationship of a church and state. It's kind of already been answered, you know, and Orthodox already has two thousand years of how you go about symphonia, which is the double headed eagle. It's not a Masonic symbol. It's you got one body of the people, church and state working together in harmony. It's

not perfect. They're going to have corrupt church leaders, are going to have corupt politicians. But the ideal is when Christianity permeates, you do have Christian laws.

this shop. You know, there's just varying perspectives, and we're able to like actually do church every single day rather than one denomination where you know, like we just go up once a week.

we're having a two day Orthodox conference. So we've already got about one hundred and fifty people coming. You guys are welcome to show up.

luck with that. But that was back in like the late two thousands when that was kind of not really it was everybody was doing podcasts at that time, and I remember he was specifically and he wasn't laughing. He was laughing in a shitty way, like you won't make it, you know what I mean. I was like, well, just about that. So but he was that weirdo creep that he didn't ever like touch my But the word was he tried to sleep with the young dudes on campus. So yeah, I'm just like, yeah, whatever, dude.