Discussing the fact that the Western elites, it's not just banking houses, it's also corporate industries that really helped to build up Hitler and his government, and they wanted Hitler to go into Poland. They wanted that war the Western establishment as a holder, and so it wasn't a one person or one group wanting that war. It was very wealthy, very powerful elites wanting that war for multiple reasons, to make money off of ammunitions and debt for the future.
When Germany lost, the future generations of the German people would then be forever into debt to the West. That's that whole World Bank IMF model of perpetual generational debt enslavement. So that's not restricted to any single group of people. If you can go back to the Middle Ages, for example, Jews didn't have a whole lot of power in the Middle Ages. They were in the minority pretty much everywhere they were. And it wasn't Jews in the Middle Ages,
for example, that were able to push user. A lot of people people identify usury in the West with Jews, and it's true that Judaism allows for usury, but that couldn't have happened in the West if the papacy had not, for example, changed its position on the promotion allowance of user, which happened in the Renaissance period. So there's a lot of examples of this which I think make it more complex than it's all that group, it's all
that group. I think all these groups work together at certain levels and at certain times for different ends. And I think that right now we're seeing a lot of powerful groups vying for control of the global power structure and all that.
But I don't think that in the end, you know, if you were in China, for example, it's true that, you know, China has made deals with people in the Clan administration back in the nineties, they made deals with the Israelis at different points, But I don't think that from the Chinese perspective, for example, they envision a future that is you know,
wh I think they envisioned a future that's Chinese. Haven't they put out a document, you know, explaining their long term one hundred thousand years geopolitical plan for the dominance of China. So I think you're right to bring up that different power blocks have different motivations in different endgames, and there can be
you know, competing levels of power and influence in different ways. Now, certainly in the West we see a lot of influence from uh, you know, Apack in these kinds of things, but there's also a tremendous amount of influence from Islam, Saudi Arabia, Islamic banking, for example. People don't
talk about Islamic banking. Banking is thought to be you know, just to Jewish same but actually there's a large, very powerful international Islamic banking structure, and that ties into the history of the funding, for example, of radical terror groups, the Muslim Brotherhood. Robert Dreyfuss has a really good book on this called Devil's Game. For example, Mark Curtis has a really good book
called Secret Affairs, which he's a Royal Society researcher. And I've done lectures through these books on my my YouTube channel years ago, and these books really illustrate the way that the Western establishment has attempted to utilize radical Islam, not just going back to the divvying up of the Middle East through people like Lawrence Arabia, but that same model isn't adopted by the CIA post nineteen fifties and
sixties, when they discarded pan Arabism and then adopted the model of the British Empire of using radical Islam. It's the British Empire had a strategy that they wanted to capture and control Mecca. That was one of the British imperial strategies there that had to do with competing with Ottoman Empire at the time. So when you think about big global empires, you know that I think helps under and especially at twenty entry and which ones decline and which once came to power.
That helps us understand I think the nuance of not falling into the trap of thinking that everything is run by a single entity or a single group, even though you can have these entities with a lot of power and a lot of a lot of influence. So I wanted to talk today about something that ties in very well to what Alex was talking about earlier when he was discussing
the dialectical manipulation. And there's a great article that was written several years ago over at Washington's blog, and it's basically just sort of taking a journey through all the admitted examples of false flags and when we look at all of these what we're going to see is that this is not restricted to any single tribe or group of people. It's not restricted to Islamic governments, it's not restricted
to the West, it's not restricted to tiny mustache man. This is a technique, a tactic used by governments and power structures, and conceivably even non governmental actors, private groups, NGO's, think tanks, corporations, they might
also be engaged in false flag operations. So today I want to talk about the forty two admitted examples of false flags, and we'll kind of work through these really quick and you'll see that once we understand that this is a technique, we're going to be a lot more perceptive in decoding the supposed events that come out all the time that we're supposed to just accept at face value. And when we understand that there's a long history of false flags, we're not
going insane or we're not being tenfil hat people. When we consider the possibility of false flags, anybody that reads and studies warfare, for example, military people, military historians, people that study psychological warfare, they would all know.
Everybody knows that you can stage an event or it can be real, it can be fake, it can be you know, however you want to set it up whatever works for the specific situation, and it's done to blame the enemy, right to give you the perception of being a victim, to give you the perception of the right to do this or that in some international
conflict or theater of war. One of the first examples that's listed, and by the way, they're all cited at the Washington Blog website in terms of every everything is linked here two various government websites and commissions, and you know official reports. Japanese troops, for example, in nineteen thirty one blew up a small train and blamed it on China in order to justify the invasion of
Manchuria. This is known as the Mukden incident or the Manchurian incident. In the Tokyo International Military Tribunal found that several participants in this plan, including Hashimoto, the high ranking Japanese army officer, on various occasions admitted that they did take part in this plot and that the purpose of this incident was to an excuse to give an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the quantum Army.
So that's one example, and if we think about this well, does this mean that, oh, well, I guess China is all the good guys and the Japanese are all the bad guys. Now, this is just one example of a historical conflict, and it doesn't make either side inherently good or
bad from the Vans point of this action. Right number two, SS officials in the Nazi regime admitted at Nuremberg trials that under the orders of the Gestapo they had fake attacks on their own people and resources and blamed it on the polls, and that this was used as a justification by Hitler for the invasion
of Poland. Now remember in Quigly that was all There was a dual policy where the British establishment and the Western corporations and Bank of England and others put money into helping tiny mustache men come to power and to have armaments and the war machine that he had. That's admitted quickly. He's not a conspiracy man. He's an establishment CFR historian, an archivist. So that we're basically getting the admission that this was done or the purpose of giving a justification for the
invasion of Poland. Some of this false flag event, another false flag event involving the SS was or she a Nazi. German leader Franz Holder testified that together with Herman Guring, they had set fire to the German parliament building in nineteen thirty three and they blanded on a slow boy who claimed to be a Communist, who was the patsy. So the leader Nikuta Krushchev admitted that the Soviet Red Army shelled the Russian village of Manila in nineteen thirty nine and blamed
it on Finland. This gave a basis then a justification for launching the Winter War against Finland. This was later admitted to and discussed by Boris Yeltson. Of course Yeltson himself, what's a Western Cia asset to help loot Russia? After the fall of the Wall Number five, the Russian Parliament admitted that Putin and former Soviet leader Gorbachov that Stalin had been involved in a secret police order to execute twenty two thousand Polish officers in nineteen forty and this was blamed on
the Nazis. So you see that this is a technique in a tactic that's used all the time. Doesn't make the other side that's the victim necessarily the good guys. It means they're innocent in this event, but that doesn't mean that they're necessarily angel cakes are good people, right. The British government admitted that between nineteen forty six and nineteen forty eight that it had bombed five ships
carrying Jews attempting to flee persecution in Germany and seek refuge in Palestine. They set up a fake group called the Defenders of Arab Palestine and then had this pseudo group claim responsibility for this event. In nineteen fifty four, Israel admits that in Israeli sell operating in Egypt bombed several buildings, including the US diplomatic facility, and this evidence was left behind then to implicate Arabs as the culprits.
This stokes again Middle Eastern conflict. The CIA admitted that it hired Iranians in nineteen fifties to pose as communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mozadek, and this helps to bring in the Shaw who was CIA man all declassified right Operation AJAX.
The Turkish military assuming Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the nineteen fifty five bombing of a Turkish consulate in Greece, which damaged the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey, and it was blamed on Greece for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti Greek versus Turk violence. Number ten.
The British Prime Minister admitted to his Defense Secretary and American President Dwight Eisenhower that they approved to a plan at nineteen fifty seven to carry out attacks on Syria and blamed it on the Syrian government as a way to affect the resume change. Very similar by the way to what we saw in the twenty tens with the chemical weapons attacks supposedly blamed on a SAD used the White Helmets was a
front organization that was all fake. The chemical attack was then later proven and shown to be staged by the BBC or the VBC has involved in that staging. Former Italian minister and judge former head of Italian intelligence Counter Challenges, admitted that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon the CIA, this is of course's operation Gladiol, headed up by Kissinger, carried out terror bombings in Italy
via Gladio in other European countries in nineteen fifties. That was blamed on left in communist groups in order to rally support for the governments in Europe in the fight against communism. Now, does that mean that I think communism and Marxism
is good. Of course not. I think they're horrible atheistic systems. But I'm willing to admit that that doesn't make it good and right to engage in Gladio style terror operations in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, UK, where black op hit teams engage in these kinds of operations. One participant in the Gladio operations said you had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocence in order to be an
unknown people far removed from the politics. The reasoning was quite simple. This would then force the Italian public to turn to the state for greater security and against any notions of quote liberalism. Nineteen sixty American center George Smathers suggested that the US launch a false flag on Guantanamo Bay, which then give an excuse
to hype up tensions and go to war with Castro. Thirteen State Department show that in nineteen sixty one, the Joint chiefs of Staff and other officials discussed blowing up a consul in the Dominican Republic to justify an invasion of the Dominican Republic. Plans were not carried out, however, they discussed. They were
discussed as a serious proposals Number fourteen. The US government recently declassified document in nineteen sixty two that show that the American Joint Cheese Staff signed off on a plan to blow up American Airlines airplanes and to commit terror acts on American soil and then again blame it on Cuba and to justifying invasion of Cuba. That doesn't mean that I think Cuban communism. R. Castro is a good guy. I think he's a total globalist. This is just demonstrating that false flags
are not foreign to the historical military record. They're actually pretty normal when it comes to how the state or how governance actually occurs. In the following ABC report, official documents show that the former watching an investigative reporter for ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings and discussed as that American Airlines report that was part
of Number fourteen. Number fifteen nineteen sixty three, the US Defense Department road a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States, such as Trinidad, Tobago or Maka, that would then also be falsely blamed on Cuba. So quite a few of these at that time bird related to Cuba. Number sixteen, the Defense Department suggested covertly playing planting a person or paying a person in the Cuban Castro government to attack the United States. This would they
give a justification again for some sort of operation against Cuba. Number seventeen, the NSA admitted that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkien in nineteen sixty four. There was a manipulation of data to make it look like the North Vietnamese had fired on the US ship. This created a justification for the Vietnam War, and it was actually Jim Morrison of the Doors as
a Dad Admiral Morrison that was on the ship involved in that event. Number eighteen US Congressional Committee admitted that as part of its co intel program, the FBI used many provocateurs in nineteen fifties throughout the nineteen seventies that carried out violent actions had falsely blended on political activists. Now you might say, well, but those were radical leftists, and so maybe the SYS had to do that
to shut down the crazy leftist. We understand that the system nowadays does the exact same thing to all of the right wing groups that are out there. Number nineteen. A top Turkish general admitted that the Turkish forces burned down a mosque and Cyprus in nineteen seventy and then blamed it on the Cypriots. The general explained, in this special war, acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemies to increase public resistance. We did this against Cyprus. We
even burned down a mosque. In a response to the surprise correspondence in credulous, the general said, I'm just giving you one example. German government admitted in nineteen seventy eight the German Secrets Service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted the escape tools on the prisoner involved in the bottom Minehoff Red Army faction, which the secret Service then blamed, wish to blame the bombing on Number twenty one, and I saw it, agent admits,
this is I think Victor Ostrowski's book By Way of Deception. In nineteen eighty four, Massaud planted a radio transmitter on Gadaffi and his compound in Tripoli, Libya, was broadcast fake Terrists transmissions recorded by Masaud in order to frame Goodaffi as a terror supporter. As a result, Reagan then bombed Libya afterwards.
Number twenty two South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that in nineteen eighty nine, the Civil Cooperation Bureau, a covert branch of the South African Defence Force, approach an explosives expert and asked him to participate in operation aimed at discrediting the ANC African National Congress, thus framing an say that doesn't mean, by the way that I think the ANC is good. I think they're terrible. But the point is that this is just another example of false flag operations.
So we're through about half of the list. When we come back from this break, we'll go through the other half of this list of forty plus false flags admitted on the Alex Jones show I'm Your Guest host jade I r. Two thousand and one. We're only a few days after that. I thought it would be good to rehearse this principle of false flag operations and how that
ties into what Alex was talking about today with dialectical manipulation. And number twenty three is where we got to Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admitted that in the nineteen nineties the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and blame Islamic militants for the killing. And that's actually in the French press that it's cited there. So again, all of these are mainstream sourced, They're not
sourced from conspiracy websites. And I would add to that that doesn't make Islamic militants or Islamic philosophy good. Remember that again, this is a technique that any state or power can use as an opposition force, and even those not in power can conceivably use. It doesn't have to be the state. It can be you know, small cells of guerrilla operators, who operators who do not have you know, state power, They could also conceivably engage in this.
Number twenty four in Indonesia and Fact Finding Team investigated the violent riots from nineteen ninety eight, which determined that elements of the military have been involved in provoking the riots and thus it was a stage provocateur event, not an organic
riotous event. Number twenty five. Senior Russian military and intelligence officers admitted that the KGBLI was involved in blowing out the Russian apartment building in the nineteen nineties and this was blamed on the Chechens as part of the justification of an invasion
of Chechnya. Number twenty six. Washington Posts admitted in two thousand and two that Indonesian police and military killed American teachers and Papua in two thousand and two and blamed it on the Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization. So this was done to just list this group and sort of out to ban them and get them shut down. Number twenty seven. The well respected Indonesian president admitted that the government played a role in the
Bali bombings. Number twenty eight. The BBC in New York Times an AP reported that Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered seven innocent immigrants and pretended that these were Al Qaeda cells to promote the war on terror. In Macedonia. Number twenty nine. Senior officials in Genoa, Italy admitted that in two thousand and one, at the G eight summit, the Establishment the police I believe were involved in planting molotov cocktails and stabbed in the stage stabbing of a police
officer to justify the violent crackdown of the GA protesters. Number thirty The FBI admits that in two thousand and one, the anthrax attacks carried out by one or more government scientists were actually US government scientists, they were not Al Qaeda operatives. Twenty three or government officials also confirmed that the White House tried to link anthrax to Iraq, which was a false linking, and that was part of their justification for the Iraq War. Number thirty one. The US blamed
Iraq for playing a role in nine to eleven. This was shown by a memo from the Defensive Secretary as one of the main justifications for the Iraq War. However, after Cheney and others had claimed this, there was no evidence or proof that Iraq had any involvement whatsoever in the nine to eleven events.
Number thirty two. Former Justice Department lawyer John us suggested in two thousand and five that the US should go on the offensive against al Qaeda and use intelligence agencies to create fake terror cells and organizations that would have their own websites, their own recruitment centers, their own training camps, their own fundraising operations, which is kind of what isis and all of that is so kind of spilling
the beans. There Number thirty three UPI, United President of National in two thousand and five admitted quote US intelligence officers reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using Barretta ninety two pistols. The serial numbers, however, have been a race. The numbers are not appeared to have been physically removed. The pistols are actually seemed to have come off of the line in production without any serial numbers. This suggests, according to some analysts, that the weapons
were intended for intelligence operations or terrist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts then speculated that these guns were probably delivered from either Massaud or the CIA. Ana Wills speculate that the agent provocateurs may have been using untraceable weapons even as US authorities used insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of illegitimacy. Of the resistance.
Number thirty four. Undercover Israeli soldiers emitted in two thousand and five two throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers to blame on Palestinians, which is used as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests of the Palestinians. Number thirty five. The Quebec police admitted in two thousand and seven that thugs carrying rocks to a
peaceful protests were actually uncover Quebec police officers. Thirty six. At the G twenty protests in London in two thousand and nine, British member of Parliament admitted to seeing plain clothes officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence. Number thirty seven. Egyptian politicians admitted that the government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in twenty
eleven two discredit protesters. Number thirty eight. Colombian army colonel admitted that his unit murdered fifty seven civilians and then dressed them in uniforms and claimed there were rebels killed in combat. Number thirty By the way, Operation Mincemeat or the sinking of the Lusitania, These are other examples that are not on this list. Mince Meat, of course, is well known, and there's a whole
movie about Operation Mincemeat which came out fairly recently. That was involving Ian fleming and others in setting up a staged dead body to mislead the German military. The highly respected writer for The Telegraph Ambrose Evans Pritchard. This number thirty nine says that the head of Saudi intelligence, Prince Bandar, admitted that the Saudi
government controls Chechen terror networks. Number forty High level American sources admitted that the Turkish government, which they fellow in NATO country, carried out chemical weapons attacks and blamed the Syrian government. High ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry out these attacks and then blame it on Syria exactly. That's what I
mentioned earlier. Number forty one. The former Ukrainian security chiefs admitted that the sniper tacks which started the Ukrainian coup were actually carried out in order to frame others. So this relates directly to the war in the Ukraine back in twenty fourteen. The snipers which riled up the crowd of the Madanku and all that
that was actually engineered by the West Britain spy agency. British Intelligence has admitted number forty two that it carries out digital false flags by attacks on targets, by framing people by riding offensive or unlawful materials and then blaming it on them vias sock puppets. In addition to third, two thirds of the city of Rome burned in sixty four a d under Nero and the Emperor, Nero blamed
the Christians for this event famous historical false flag. In fact, as the author of Washington Blogs post notes, some of the taught Roman leaders, including the Roman consul Cassius, as well as historians like Suetonius, do agree that it's actually Nero that started the fire. This is based large on the fact that the Roman Senate had just rejected Nero's application to clear three hundred acres in Rome to build a giant palace. The fire then allowed him to build that
palace. And so because this is such a common thing in warfare or in you know, regional conflicts, it actually has its own tagged name. Now, it doesn't mean that everything in warfare or everything every event is fake or a false flag. That's certainly not true. These are just ones that are
it admitted in his list. There's actually others as well. Males Copeland in his book Game and Nations, the history of his operations with the CIA in Egypt, Syria and Egypt, there's a whole chapter, whole section where he talks about his usage of radicals who were terrorists, says they're very useful to
the CIA. But the point is that you have essentially this is so common that it's it's got a term a false flag operation, right, And you know this list doesn't even include the nine to eleven event, the Big Nine, which we just were reminded of four or five days ago. I think there's if you look at the history of that event, there's all kinds of indicators clues that show very similarly that it was one of those same types of
events. If you look at the way that controlled demolition occurs, if you look at the p neck documents ahead of time, if you look at Operation Visual and Guardian, which was running drills of the same operations, if you look at Alex's interviews with Barry Jennings, all of those things I think speak to think that most people think, well, I wouldn't operate that way, and so it's certainly not possible. The government cares about me, the system,
and it cares about my life. They wouldn't lie about me. They wouldn't create a staged event or a real event and blame it on an enemy. That's just not very nice. Well, the power structure operates on a pragmatic basis. They operate on a pragmatic power basis, and when we read the writings of the elite, that's exactly what we find. We find that
level of machiavellianism, that level of manipulation, that level of psychopathy. There's a phrase that comes up in psychology called the dark triad, and the dark triad traits and psychology are narcissism, psychopathy, and machiavellianism. And sometimes they're not. Sometimes people have one or two of them, and maybe perhaps all three of them, but it doesn't really matter because it's a great way to describe the modus operandi of the establishment. And you know, in today's discussion
there was a lot of concern about certain groups. But I want to give an example of somebody that many Israelis, for example, don't like. They don't like people like the big New Brazinski. And if you go and read a book like Between Two Ages, this is the book that when Henry Kissing, Durant, David Rockefeller saw this text written by this young academic at the time in the nineteen seventies, they said, here's a guy that we need
to put in charge of some kind of group. And so in the early seventies they put him in Charing. Nineteen seventy three they put it's the big new Brazinski in charge of the Trilateral Commission, which is one of these higher level steering committees. People buy a lot of people from the Council on Foreign Relation, which already existed. It's the nineteen twenties. This is another higher level type of committee. Guess what They did the same thing with another verse
person you might have heard of, called Klaus Schwab. And so the Harvard project headed up by Kissinger, said, take that Schwab guy, put him in charge of something. And so Klaus went from from Builderberg to the project they set up called Davos or the World Economic Forum. It's in other words, these individuals here running these kinds of situations, setting these kinds of things
up. This is at the level of Kissinger at the level of Brazinski has a lot of CI involvement, but this is I think you could say this is a level above normal intelligence operations. This is at the level of, you know, the real movers and shakers in the power lead. And if we moved through a little bit of between two ages, you know this is going on almost I think two and a half three years of hosting the Fourth Hour, I don't even recall if I've done a fourth Hour on Brazinski's between
two ages, but it works perfect. I guess in the last a few minutes of the Fourth Hour here to get into the basics of this book, and you'll see why Brazinski was so such a prodigy. I guess you could say for the power structure, for the system to be recruited. Of course, Brazinski's background was comes from a family of Polish nobility, and thus there was a kind of long time hatred and animos an enmity between his family and the Russians, and so he was a perfect figure in the Cold War.
Brazinski was at McGill University, which happens to be one of the key MK ultra universities, by the way, and so Brazinski wrote this book about the technocratic Revolution, or what Klaus later calls in his books the force industrial Revolution. So I understand that it's the same thing. They're referring to, the
same thing. Klaus's book was twenty eighteen, the biggest Brazinski's book is nineteen seventy two, three seventy, nineteen seventy, and so he says that we're gonna have to take account of where technology is going because we are entering into a new revolution, kind of like the industrial revolution. But this is something unlike anything else in history. It's not comparable even to the early revolutions,
that will far exceed that in its impact on human civilization. And one of the first things he talks about which kind of blew me away, was the way that he describes the malleability of human beings and what they will mutate into. I'm not kidding. So you know, we think about books like The Island of Doctor Moreau, which I read not too long ago and wrote an essay on which if you get this edition of it and read it, I highly recommend. This one of the HD Wells books I read many years ago.
Do you get this edition? I recommend it because it has an introduction by a person from the Salk Institute. And if you know about Jonah Salk, we've covered his books like Man Unfolding and Survival of the Wisest about the
history of inoculations and genetic experimentation that he favors in terms of enthusianism. Well, the article at the beginning of the introduction is written by a person from the Salt Institute, and they write about how H. G. Wells was so ahead of his time when it came to human experimentation, for example, and the author of this book, who's the person from the establishment, talks about government experiments using Guatemalans in nineteen forty six to nineteen forty eight for a
human experimentation. The author talk the introductory editor talks about human beings can be rewired and retooled not just from the inside, but also via their environment, and that this could give rise to transhumanism and that ultimately this would be a challenge for future man to remain man. And so the establishment as we know wants to us pass what it is to be human. Brazenski talked about that and mutating man in the very first chapter of Between two ages. I'll read
what he says. He says that life seems to lack cohesion in terms of modernity. With all of these rapidly evolving events and phenomena, man is becoming more and more manipulate, manipulable, and malleable. That's the plasticity of human
kind that's talked about in the Island of Doctor Moreau. By the way, the Island of Doctor Moreau is a it's an allegory for the world from the mad scientist perspective, right, the mad scientist wants to do this kind of genetic experimentation on the human race, and so the island is a microcousin a mini example of what the scientism based worldview has for the human world as a whole. Brazenski goes on to say that everything seems more transitory, and everything
is temporal. External reality is moving to be more and more fluid. It's not solid. There's not stasis, pure flux or the human being is more synthetic than authentic. Our senses perceive an entirely novel reality, one of our own making, but nevertheless it is our own sensations and they're quite real.
More importantly, there is already evolving or already widespread concerned about the possibility of biological and chemical tampering with mankind that has up until now been considered the immutable essence. In other words, men were perceived to have a human nature that makes the man. And if GMO GMO man, if Frankenstein man is the future, then that means that there is no human nature or essence. Man can evolve into anything human conducts, some argue, can be predetermined and subject
then to deliberate control. Man is increasingly acquiring the capacity to determine, for example, the sexuality of his children and affect that through drug to the extent of their intelligence and modifying control their personalities. This is mk ultrastyle stuff that he's referencing, speaking of a future at most only a few decades away.
An experiments are in intelligence control asserted to me or asserted I should say quote, I first see the time when we shall have the means and therefore the inevitability to temptation to manipulate the behavior and intellectual functionings of all people through environmental
and biochemical manipulations of the brain. That's mk ultra on a mascal, and that is from a publication that Brasinski, as citing called computer technology from nineteen sixty eight, and that the use of holography could just be used to create the sensations of living presences or alternate realities, as well as creating actuality of conversations by beaming lasers into the brain from a satellite. So he's talked about
the possibility of Skynet mind control in the future. That's actually what it says. That's not me as Brazinski citing that right there. You can read it for yourself, not making it up. This is not just some random guy. This is right. He was a national security advisor to know many presidents Obama for example. He then goes on to talk about other things like weather weapons, and he says the future we envision in the future a situation where
even the weather can be modified and become a type of a weapon. And now remember that doesn't exists. Your conspiracy there if you if you talk about that, even though it's in Brazinski's book on page fifty seven. But also by the way, it does exist, and we have to do it to put it into climate change and the sun cooking us all. You see,
So there's a lot more in that text. That's just a little introduction there to again how the Establishment views humankind and what the possibilities are for human manipulation, And what better example of human manipulation than false flag