Think Tanks, NGOs & Foundations: Oligarchs Destroying Tradition-Jay Dyer Flashback

link to it at the website as well. Now we're going to transition in a minute to our next guest, who is no stranger to this show or twenty first Century Wire. But before we do that, before we introduce our guest, Jay Dyer, I just wanted to get a few housekeeping items together with regards to the website and what's happening in the next coming months, So we are launching a membership drive for members subscriptions from May first.

We just want to announce that now. The details are going to be forthcoming at the website and we've been working very carefully behind the scenes to try to get it right, and we hope we've got a program and a set of things that we'll be able to do and roll out in the next month and further afield too.

Very exciting, a lot of work though, it's going to take a lot of work to do what we want to do, what we want to give the members in terms of a unique experience, some big add ons to what we're doing right now, and this is going to include video production as well. But we're going to need your help to make that happen. And so some of

our supporters already already know about this. If you're on our mailing list of the people who supported our trip to Beirut, you'll already know about this announcement and you have a little more details for those supporters, But we'll tell everybody probably next week or probably the following or if not the following week. We'll announce it next week,

but we'll give more details the following week. So we're going to be very very busy trying to make ends meet and keep the site improving as well at the same time increase and improve our news and analysis at twenty first century wire dot com. So that's something to look forward to. Now, there's a new shout poll up and if you go to twenty first Central wy dot com, you'll see our shout page there's a link on the show page and basically, this is our shout poll this

week is the United States? Does it have a democracy or an autocracy? And that's the poll. We've already got a few voters already. You can comment in the poll. This is a unique technology we developed with a tech startup called square offs and it's an ultimate engagement and debate and voting all in one widget. So go ahead and have your shout. Is the US a democracy or an autocracy? And don't want to get into any arguments with anybody who will say, well, no, it's uh, it's

an oligarchy, not in autocracy. Who cares? My point? Is not a democracy. So that's the main point of it. We want to get some lively debates going in there. Now. Our next guest, Uh. He is the author of the much anticipated upcoming uh probably eventually will be in my mind anyway, a bestseller s so Teric Hollywood from trendon Day Publishing, and he's also uh the editor and founder

of Jay's Analysis uh dot com. There's a link to it on the show page and UH, you know this, I'm looking up at the stories at Jay's Analysis right now and it's just fascinating. Uh. We've also got you know, I'm not going to talk about Prince's death this week. We'll leave that off the uh So we're not going to talk about Prince and we're not going to play Dove's cry uh in the background like every single mainstream media outlet is doing. I don't know, have I got

have I got that on the soundboard? I don't know. I'm Badger. Can you hear Prince in the background there? I'm not sure if Badger's listening or not.

But but so, how how's how's the book coming along. I just want to get that out the way first. I mean, you must be the pre orders I'm sure are coming in right.

see movies in a new way. And I ended up with four hundred and four footnotes. So many of those, by the way, are twenty first century wire articles, so you'll be happy to know that you're referenced in their Patrick as well as Sean Helton and the good Fellows over at Sold the East excellent.

And you know, we had a discussion the last hour with ken Stone about Palmyra, and I had some pretty stark experiences while I was over in the Middle East regarding archaeology, regarding heritage, regarding modernism, and I saw the real clash of civilizations. Jay. It's it's not the West versus the East, or the White Man versus the Arab To me, the real class of civilizations is much deeper,

and it's much more profound than the geopolitical definitions. To me, it goes deep in to the heart of what you might call modernism and traditionalism. I think it's in this direction. I wanted to bring you on to talk about this because there's a lot of psychology as well behind here. We can psychologically profile different epochs, different times, different eras. There's a mindset that I think has been it is hereditary.

I think it's carried on, it's carried over and taken different form from the past great civilizations to and fallen civilizations to today, which one day. You know, we're sitting pretty right now, but there are many civilizations right now on this planet that are running and functioning that will be fallen civilizations one day. And so that is I'm really concerned about this because my concern, Jay, isn't it It might be a frivolous concern. I think there's still

a lot to learn from past civilizations. I still believe there's a lot of knowledge lost, a lot of wisdom, and I think there's a place for it in our everyday life now. Not everyone agrees with me on that. Modernists are like, no, just pave it over, forget about it. It's all about technology and transhumanism and big glass temples basically. So where do you stand on this?

But you can never be completely a historical you can never completely get away from it any kind of roots or lineage by the simple fact that all of us come from some family and some parents. And so if you think about the family, if we were fortunate enough to grow up in some sort of father mother household, and we're not raised by a test raising a test tube or something like that where we're going, then we know that we were given some kind of culture, some

kind of tradition. Now that doesn't mean that it's necessarily correct, or that it didn't have flaws, or that things weren't wrong, perhaps about the tradition that we were given as a child and so forth, or the culture of the nation that we grew up in. But I think that the false ideology that is that undergirds modernity put in its successors and postmodernity, and what ultimately I think leads to nihilism. It's the idea that you can some now be completely

free from anything that binds you to the past. And in terms of I think what you're getting at philosophically is this notion of radical individualism, which is the ideology that's been foisted upon I think the Western world. That's pretty much the Western ideology, especially if you look at say the Rand Corporation and their whole as one of the premiere think tanks of the last century. Their whole

ideology is called rational choice theory. Now what is this, Well, this is the idea that the way to manipulate individuals is to appeal to the fact that they're going to choose as an individual for their own self interests. And so when we look at something like the Rand Corporation, which I think is a pre eminent example, this is this is what crafted the Cold War. This is what crafted the idea of mutually sure destruction, the nuke threat. It craft did the idea of the commies are going

to get us. They're everywhere, they're infiltrating everything, And it crafted the idea of consumerism, the transition out of a production based economy into a completely service based economy. It sold us on things like Obamacare ultimately, and on top of that, it also marketed the first and second Operation Operation does at Storm, in Operation Iraqi Freedom. These are actually creations of the Rand Corporation. And what is the

how did they do all this well? Because they have this idea that what we need to do is to sell everybody on the idea that their own personal, hedonistic desires are the only way that they can be quote free. And they say this explicitly in numerous corporation publications. So I would I would see that as a main ideological force in what crafted the modern American West as we

know it. And I would say that obviously America and the ideology of America is what pretty much dominates the what we might call the atlantisys power block right, which would be US, UK, Israel, France and so forth. And so that whole ethos that then seeks to force the rest of the world into that ideology of necessity. It has to destroy any existing perhaps firewalls we might call them, and that would be anything from history, culture, tradition, family, nation, state,

et cetera, et cetera. All those things have to go because there seem to be aspects of the old way of doing things and everything is now supposed to transition into a completely New World, and it's really the as you pointed out in your excellent article, the smart power

industrial complex. That's the chief goal they have, right. So, in other words, the Rank corporation pretty much has a whole slew of offspring that are much like it insofar as they deal with safe foreign policy or think tanks dealing with a certain region like Middle East or whatever crisis groups. You know, there's myriad of these of these institutions, and what they do is essentially churn out constant white

papers to reformulate and reorganize entire regions. And so you mentioned the Middle East, Well, we only need think of the Odinya non Plan, which was the Israeli plan from several decades ago regarding what would happen in the Middle East in our day, and we actually see the playing out of that presently, and that would include these situations

in Libya in now Syria. And so this is how we can fit the events in our day into this larger scheme is by looking at some of these key white papers and policy papers and so forth that you outlined in your article and that I also outlined in an article I did called Isis Feminists and Thugs dupes of the foundations and think tanks, and so what do you see is across all of these movements, whether it be Air of Spring or whether it be the promotion

of feminism and women's rights in other countries by the Rockefeller and Ford Foundation, what you see is a common theme of quote democracy, humanitarianism, individual liberty, and freedom from all constraints supposedly. But what those things actually are is as you called them accurately, they're called soft power. They're soft power techniques of swaying mass perception and opinion to get inboard with some power blocks strategy for the region.

And that's I think the best way to sum it up is that it's really about duping peopleeople into buying into something that services another engender, namely Washington's foreign policy, mainly when you're talking about the Middle East and other regions Russia, Ukraine and so forth.

Because if you obliterate someone's cultural identity, then you really obliterate there is your cultural identity. And here's my question. Is your cultural identity your true political identity in many ways? And if you smash that, if you bliterate it, then you've really obliterated your political power as well.

manipulation as well, like as you said, identity politics. But I think that if you look at the big, big scale, long term plans, it's ultimately about getting rid of all of those things. And that's why the Rank corporation, for example, deals with big scale philosophies, big scale ideologies, right, rational choice theory being how can we sell everybody on the idea that your individual hedonistic desires are the best way

for you to be happy and free? And so rational choice theory dictates that whatever means, there might be a period where you want to promote radical identity politics and nationalism, but then down the road that transitions into something else. Right, And this is Alvin Toffler talks about this in Third Wave, where he says that we might need to promote things

like veganism. We might need to promote certain things that can steer a movement of philosophy and ideology and identity in a certain direction for a time period in order to get to that final goal. And I think, I know I brought it up many times, but I bring

it up because of such a great example. This is really what Aldo Sarcley says in the introduction of Brave New World, where he says, look, there was a whole bunch of revolutions right in the revolution, Scientific Revolution, French Revolution. I'm going to I'm telling you how all of those revolutions were stages in a process. Now I know that I'm gonna get a little esoteric here, but you can

also look at Arthur Kessler who calls it alchemy. And so when he talks about the ghost in the machine, which is his naturalistic Darwinian materialistic statement about how the mind of man's the mind of man, consciousness and free will, along with Bertrand Russell saying this need to be stamped out. This is how we create a more controlled automaton cubicle being right, much much like the factory line process of streamlined products, so that the man himself becomes a factory

streamline monoculture product. Right. And this is obviously you can see quite advantageous to the international mega corporations and conglomerates that pretty much run run the globe. So that's what it's all about. Yeah, you might have a time where people promote you an ideology that appeals to your ego. Right, I'm a feminist, I'm strong, and i want to be

free from these two millennia of patriarchal tyranny. Now I'm free because I've adopted abortion, vaccines and micro loans that are not available to males.

of the alchemical process. And even though the globalists the elites think tanks types may not as a whole be occultists or esotericist or whatever I'm sure some of them are, it doesn't really matter because the essential game plan strategy is that it is you break a thing down before you build it back up, and you build it back up into what you want it to be. And that's what the purpose of all these thing tanks and in

g o's and so forth is. They're the ones that are crafting the steering mechanisms.

we all share it? Well, it's the environment. Everybody's in some way an aspect of the biosphere. So if we can sell people on the notion that it's in their individual best interest to be a part of this whatever it is, movement, then we can steer the globe into things like Agenda twenty one and United Nations UNESCO plans and gentrification zoning laws which are ultimately about creating smart cities and target cities and so forth, all these different

communal reorganization methods for large scale social engineering. So all of this is outlined in that very book, First Global Revolution. You can find it's online, easy PDF download, and it discusses the fact that open I'm not making this up. It actually says what we need to do is events everyone that man himself is the problem. Right, So when they talk about CO two's being a problem carbon, that's

they're talking about life. They're saying humans, we're carbon based life. Worms, They're saying.

And when you look at the origins of the so called green movement, I don't doubt that there were many sincere environmentalists, you know, back in the day or whatever. But I look at earth Day. I mean, the founder of earth Day is this guy who killed his wife or his girlfriend, right, I mean, these are nasty people, right. The very fact that the Club of Rome's First Global Revolution says that the whole purpose is to convince human beings that they're the problem and that we need to then,

of course, cut down on population. You need to go along with banker austerity and live inside a little bitty cubicle coffin.

I know this sounds crazy. Target the corporation. They're making target cities where you're actually going to I was joking about that in talks and articles a couple of years ago. I had no idea that was real. Right, that's where they want to move everybody. And so when you're talking on the Middle East and these different regions, the so called democracy that the US is going to bring with its bombs and so forth, and sex education, that's ultimately about creating a whole bunch of new consumers.

the con is to dupe society with it. Call it social justice, call it climate justice. Call it gender justice, call it all these things, call it modern justice. And it's it's to dupe you into a new environment that is even more controlled, that even is also more devoid of real choice and real unique experiences than before. And it's a con. It's a huge con.

it's a mono state. It's it's a monoculture. You have, you have the you've been told since youth that you were free, and you believe that you're free, even though everything in your daily experience contradicts that. You choose to believe it. And that's the great con, right, It's the double thing that is the great con believing what is

completely contradictory to your your everyday experience. So yeah, I mean, what one only need look at the fact that if you can see where the place is, where America has gone, or the foreign policy ventures in the West and so forth, where are ethos is established, what comes with that, Well, what comes with that is the toxic garbage culture of America.

You get all of that, all of that exported, you get the vaccines, you get the medical establishment there the So what I think is ultimately scammed to this Rockefeller medical establishment is expanded coke and pepsi right, all of that is brought to the rest of the world under the guise of humanitarian democracy and freedom. And that usually takes you know, regime change, color revolution, toppling of someone deemed undesirable, or running on some older program that the

globalists instituted. Uh yeah, so it's just phase. Isn't a business plan, I guess is the best way to look at it.

traditional uber traditionalists like the Wahabi hobbyists. And you know what we see in Isis and al Qaeda and Salafis terrorists. They they're so they're they're building this, They're they're thrusting modernism as their Islamic utopia on one hand, on the on on the backhand, they're using the primitive clerics to browbeat everybody into shape, basically, and I see the same

in Israel. They're erasing history of Palestinian history to build these modern which looks like California, Orange County suburbs out and pushing out into other countries, basically guarded by the army, changing the names of all the streets, changing the removing archaeological finds, hiding them or destroying them. And and they're using the ultra orthodox Jewish settlers, they're pushing them out. They're all uber traditionalists. So they're they're playing both sides.

You know, I see this in Saudi or Israel. Absolutely, they're playing both sides. They're using they're they're they're they're leveraging these two forces. If you will, and I think it's it's it's pretty obvious. You know. What the agenda then is to basically obliterate what is the real history what ken Stone in the last segment called the collective human cultural inheritance, where we could say collective human cultural experience.

section of the store. Oh, this was the autoparts section. Now we've got whole new displays. We need to change that out now, right, so that the Middle East might be like that, right, Like it's a certain way for a while, like the CIA supporting Arab nationalism in the forties, and then it transitions into oh, better game plan here. We want to smash this up through the support of the Jahad, which is what followed right after the Arab

nationalist period. The CIA then shifted over to supporting the Jahad and all the different radical Islm's factions that you're speaking about, and that's a great tool for smashing things up. So it it reminds me of Maoism, Right. So if you think about Mao's cultural revolution and how that marshaled the energy and enthusiasm of idealistic youth, well, idealistic youth are idiots, They're not there. It's been very much the same with the idealistic zeal of the puritanical Islamic sex

that you're talking about. You can marshal that power and energy into recrafting a certain region a certain way, depending on what your needs are. I make this point many times too. It's just like deregulation and privatization versus regulation and government authority. Right, So people fall on either side of this dialectic, when in actual fact, either of those strategies can be used at different time periods. Right. So, if you're retraging Hope, he says that FDR was working

at the behest of the bankers. So all of these reforms that FDR did to save everybody from the depression actually caused another depression in nineteen thirty seven because he was printing money at the behest of the bankers. So you can't just pay for these things out of nowhere, that it's all foisted upon the population through inflation and putting everybody into debt to the bankers to fix the

problem that the banker's cause, namely depression. Right, So the collectivization and socialization in that case was a solution from the bankers to the banker's problem of the depression. And it's the same. So you might think, oh, we'll see the collectivization, oh soo, then privatization is the solution. Well then you look at Greece, in these different countries or

John Perkins's books Economic hit Man. That's where you can have cases where deregulation and privatization is ripping everybody off. So it's it's a strategy that can use either one depending on what the particular situation is. And it's exact same with the the radical sex that you're talking about. You can use those to smash an existing culture that might be a firewall to global of strategies or corporate corporate strategies, or you can then turn around and promote

a far quote leftist quote progressive humanitarian agenda in a region. Right, So it's you're absolutely right, it's it's just it's the same as big old companies funding the green agenda.

walling it off, taking a jackhammer to it, and then building this you know, glass temple of luxury living. And you have European architects in their celebrity architects. We talked about this on previous shows. So in Syria we have whole cities destroyed and they are literally at the gates baying for the opportunity to come in and do the same in many of these places, and I think it's

a strange mix. Jay is what I'm saying. It's there's a short term profit motive to this because you know, to build and to occupy land, to own land, to build on it is an expression of power. It projects power, and then then there's there's benefits in terms of taking money for that as well in that process, so order out of chaos essentially. But this is where it gets strange.

After all the bombing, after all the destroying, after building these sort of soulless modern temples which are really Western inspired, completely bland, you know, monolithic creations everywhere you look at Dubai. I mean, it's and you have this, there's this kind of monarchical, tribalistic obsession, if you will, to this building, this clean, everything, clean and new. My question to you is where does this urge come from? Because it is

a kind of a fetish in a way. So this kind of fetish comes in after you deal with the money and the power. But there's more to it than that, I think, and I'm trying to figure it out because it's almost like a religion in terms of those elites there.

you're operating on some program or some belief system. And I think that what you see with the erection of these monuments, and you're absolutely right to point out that there's a reason for you know, if you look at the art and I'm not getting it to some goofy conspiracy thing, but if you think about the architecture of Washington, d C. It's all laid out to present a certain belief system, a certain meaning concerning the ideas of America.

And it doesn't matter whether you think that's good or bad. That's what the architecture of DC is laid out to demonstrate to show, and architecture has always been this way. It encapsulates the spirit of a people the ideals of a people and so forth, and so to blast those things away and then erect anew is precisely you said, a projection of power. And I think that ultimately the

spirit behind it is the spirit that's anti human. And that's why the modernist architecture is cold, angular box like you know, it's the slab from two thousand and one, from beyond right, it's the monolith. It's supposed to demonstrate that the new era, the new order, the new aon whatever. It is not going to be about man. It's going to be about going beyond man. Post That's the whole

point of it. Is to be posthuman. And being posthuman means first and foremost, the erasing of any kind of groupings, collective groupings existing as a part of a gender, a tribe, a culture, whatever, religion. Throw all that away, and we are going to enter into the new. It's I call it the fetish of the new, which it's not really possible to be completely new. But that is the false gospel, so to speak, right, that the system is going to

give you something completely new, a utopia. You know, all all of these platitudes that are poured forth, which ultimately as we see, and then, as many of them admit in their books, version else says ha ha ha. Ultimately, I'm going to stamp out your freedom, that's the I want to stamp out your consciousness, which, by the way, how are you going to stamp out consciousness if humans

don't have consciousness? Right? I thought we were just matter, right, we're just animals yet, but yet they want to stamp out the human spirit, free will, and consciousness, which means that those things are real.

talks about this left wing utopia. Uh, this this I don't know what the Venus Project, I think it was called, and where there's no money and everything's perfect and everything's clean and no one gets sick and et cetera. To me, those are those are mirror images. You know, there's no difference that you know, So in the West and in the East, we still have these almost mirrored cults, if you will, and they're identical. I can hardly take that apart.

When I look at some of the you know, the building promotional development videos from the GCC, and I look at the end of Zeitgeist, I see, you know, it's pretty much the words might be slightly different, but.

and I know, you know they're dialectic. One one good funny clue to this is that in Brave New World in the future, the characters aren't after Marx and Ford. It's the year of our Ford, not the year of our Lord. One of the central characters is Bernard Marx, and his point is that it's two rows that lead to the same destination, right, because what are they both about. Well, they're both about centralization of wealth, centralization of power, and

the destruction of previous existing cultures. Right. And this is why even there was even a big meeting between the capitalist West and the so called communist East many times over throughout the period of the Cold War. One of those was in I think nineteen eighty eight, at Malta where Bush and Gorbachev met. And isn't it interesting too that's speaking of to tie all this in when you look at the nineties in Russia, well, that was just an IMF scam through Clinton, Larry Summers and others to

loot Russia of billions of dollars. I think it was something like five hundred billion dollars where eluded up of Russia under the the I m F scam. That was all promoted through entities like the Carnegie Carnegie Endowment right

in Moscow. Right, So you had all these NGOs, these think tanks soft power that you talked about that was all prepping and and seeding and moving people ideologically to you know, to accept the idea, oh, we've got to go with Yeltsin because he's gonna he's gonna set us free, he's going to bring liberty. And the country was looted. Then incomes imp and they say, oh, yeah, well we'll save you sign on to all of our Western plans. Right, And you see that exact same model everywhere.

But look at Yemen, the continuously have inhabited buildings jay of some of the oldest that you could find in the world, and in Syria too, and look what's being destroyed. I think it's targeting is done intentionally. Is a lot of people overlook this and it might seem like an elementary point, people like, yeah, uh whatever, No, it's still an important point to underline. They're looking for these buildings, they're looking for these artifacts of heritage. Yeah, and these are the first targets.

monasteries and churches. Right, So I mean this is just kind of common sense that you can dupe a bunch of people with an ideology and grab a bunch of money, right, I mean, that's part of it. But it also has the effect of destroying the symbolic structures that form part of the cohesive identity of peoples. So absolutely, that's This kind of iconicism, as it's called, is very useful at times.

You can't be that if you have a past, heritage, a memory and so forth, and that has to all be wiped away.

We're streaming out live on the Alternate Current Radio Network and also at twenty first century wy dot com. And if you missed any of the live broadcast, you can go to iTunes and a number of other platforms after the show, but also at twenty first century Wire dot com. You can listen to it at your leisure and you can download it. We should have the track up minutes after the show. And the first segment with ken Stone

was brilliant. Great to have a first hand account, and we're very privileged to get some of these people on the show to give us their take and firsthand experiences. It's always valuable, along with the great articles as well. Now we're going to get back to our guest, Jadarve, but before we do that, I just wanted to also mention that in this kind of dovetails with our conversation

that we're going to have in this segment with Jay. Now, Vanessa Beiley published an article at twenty first Century Why, which is to me one of the must read articles in recent weeks. It's called George Soros the Anti Syria Impresario. Now, let me tell you, I'm not crying wolf or anything here. And I know there's a lot of alternative media talk show hosts and who constantly are trumpeting about how they've been hacked, attacked and everything. Listen, get we've been hacked,

We've been attacked. I don't always talk about it, Okay. Now, I posted Vanessa's article on Facebook last two nights ago, and before I went to bed, it was flying. I was got like one hundred and ten shares. It was going clocking up quite a few views. Great article, full of what I call eye candy as well, nice charts and things like that when I woke up in the morning it was deleted from my personal page. I posted it and it made me think, who took this off

of Facebook? Was Facebook's communitarian police or was it something else? And it was to me. Then I thought, well, this article is gold. It has some powerful information in it. I'm not exaggerating. Go look at that article. Read it. If you're not familiar with this material, tell me if your jaw isn't dropping. Okay, And this is timely as well.

So this is the George Soros soft power industrial complex where if you've got the money to throw a to spread around, and if you've got the money and you have the ground teams, the street teams, and you've got the operators at the management level, you can do lots and lots of things, not always nice things around the world, all in the name of progress and freedom and democracy and open society. Okay, that's a hell of an open society when you're hacking in and deleting people's article. And

it proves the point. Okay, and I'll let Jay jump in here. Sorry, I'm going to go on a rant, But it proves the point that all these people who are throwing their billions around to export freedom and democracy. They don't believe in a free press and much less a free speech, and that was proven to me this week. Okay, so it's all a big con hypocrites of the highest order. Okay,

sorry for that rant. But I think I look at this situation, Jay, and I wonder, you know, there's a lot of people who are understanding this now, but you really don't understand it till you sort of get cuffed on the head or punched in the nose, and then you really realize that you're not dealing with In other words, they're not playing good cricket basically.

suppress your views on your site. They will run these bots and troll accounts that will you know, post all ridiculous comments that just immediately flood the page within no time. So yeah, that's all very real. And you know, you were actually saying this, you know, several weeks ago that we were talking and you pointed out that this is something to look for and expect. You know, we're going to start seeing more of this, especially on these centralized

media platform social media platforms. What this does Twitter, Facebook, So this gives the establishment ultimately unfortunately the you know, the ability to really censor and erase things.

And we've I've produced television shows, I've done lots of different things, but I didn't want to be I didn't want to have to be looking over my shoulder with this kind of Nazi regime of communitarianism all the time, and so I just stopped making videos because it was

just like it was a minefield. And yeah, I could have made a few thousand dollars here and there over that time, but the sort of rich content that I wanted to produce, and you know, and also bringing in material from pulling in stuff and doing sort of complex assembly of ideas and multimedia this this is very difficult to do with YouTube. You could be playing by the rules Jay, as you well know, and then someone in the communitarian world can go and file a complaint, which

they do on Facebook and get rid of you. Yeah, knock you out. Basically, it's a bogus system. Basically, it's called communitarian Uh, it's corporate communitarianism basically, and it's a

it's a de facto censorship in my mind. But it's either that or go and just turn on my webcam and and do these sort of mindless YouTube videos that that everybody's everyone's doing or you know, I won't mention any names, you know, but people who speak to camera and you know, pass themselves off as philosophers and and the great minds of our generation. I really don't want to be in that sort of scrum.

to a point. I'm getting the feeling Jay though, that this cell by date on this is fast approaching because people in't even developed the world, the so called Third World. They're now understanding this a lot fast her and I think in a way the jig is up, but it's you know, it's still there's in the West. I think it's more important on the West to be moved. You know,

these institutions like the National Endowment for Democraty. Most people internationally will look at that as a total sham, you know, or the Open Society Instito. But in America, if you work for these organizations, you festoon and parade around like you're you know, bureaucratic royalty. Basically, you know, helping to make the world a better place.

It's it's that reminds me of met a girl from Vanderbilt who's working with Doctors Without Borders. Look at Doctors without Borders. That was started by one of the heads of Builderberg, one of the big key players in Builderberg. And it's very much a cover, right, we see this quite often. It's a classic espionage cover for missionaries USA things like that. But it doesn't even have to be

some sort of James Bond cover thing. It's really as you point out, the influence that these entities, these organizations try to inculcate in foreign in regions that under under false auspices, is what I'm trying to say. So, whether its USAID or these these different organizations open society. So they're there for quite obviously political reasons, right, it's not

about humanitarian and agendas. And if we want to figure out why that is, we look at these different Institute for Strategic Studies, Chatham House Crisis Group, International Crisis Group, CFR, Brookings Institute, Group of thirty f Foundation for Defensive Democracy. I mean, there's just infinite numbers of these these They're always popping up. We look back to where does this

come from? This goes back to the roundtable groups and the Roundtable Groups were formed to basically be the think tank for back in that time the British Empire, right with Cecil Rhads, Lord Milner, and so from the Oxford Roundtable Groups you get the Council on Formulations as the Western mirror to that institution, right for the American mirror to the British institution, the Chatham House and so forth. And these are the planning committees, right, this is the

Planning st Edgy Committee. For example. A lot of the CFR are media persons, so people involved in media to be anywhere at the top of media pretty much requires some degree of seal of approval and stamp from the councilor Foreign Relations. And this is how this is how you had the CIA buying off back in the forties and fifties four hundred journalists and top editors under Operation Mockingbird. Now, if they were doing that in the forties and fifties,

does anybody think that's ceased. No, So you're absolutely spot on when you point out that it's a tie in. Right, the mass the mainstream media works together with these kinds of organizations to promote political agendas, namely the agendas of Washington, London, Israel and so forth.

also a new one in New Claire, j is Vice News. Yes. Now, I don't know if you're familiar with them. I've I've had my own personal, you know, brief experiences with that organization. And then it doesn't take a lot to go find to go see that Vice News. It's being marketed as this kind of off road global media for the Miln generation. They got their seed funding seventy dollars from News Corporation from Rupert Murdoch. So Rupert Murdoch is a charter owner

of Vice News. So really cool for the millennials, isn't it. They're all people who say, I don't watch Fox, you know. Oh, I would never read the Sun or the you know whatever, the Daily New York Daily Post or whatever. The news corp rags are the tabloids, the conservative media, and these are their bank rolling Vice.

human rights and uh they what else? Democracy? And and the glorification of color revolutions, even though they're apps proven to be completely engineered from outside of these countries, and to to great budgets as well, billions of dollars spent, including taxpayer money spent to generate some of these color revolutions in George Soros and so forth.

one side of the dialectic persons. But what they discovered they thought they were investigating communism, and what they found was that all of the leftist socialist communist movements at that time, which were actually just another tool of those foundations, they were all being funded by the Rockefeller, Carnegie and Ford Foundation. And so this aversive as they call it, and the Norman Dodd reports, the subversive movements that we're

promoting both internationalism and moral relativism. That was the technique and strategy, weaponized plan for America at that time right, that was what was needed in America in the fifties. But at other times it might be a proxy force of radical as you're hot, like you're talking about, you know, with ISIS or previously al Qaeda, and these the tax refoundations are a main source of this soft power smart

power that you're talking about. And they're a way for these oligarchs to on the one hand, hide money, right, you can hide money in a tax refoundation, and it's also a way to influence masses of populations through social engineering. And so the Race Committee found all that. They discovered all that, and then they realized, oh, actually it's not a bunch of you know, granola hippie tree hugging commies out on the street. Uh, it's actually these billionaire foundations.

After the show, you can listen to the archive, which will be up minutes after the show on twenty first century Why dot com, and you can later in the day. We'll have the download link up and a podcast will be on iTunes and in some other places.

we live in a democracy. Is the ideas being absolutely dismantled right in front of our eyes and for all you and I laugh in a way at the sort of your classic liberal left wing people that have pre trumpmatic stress disorder, who are totally afraid and scared and obsessed with Donald Trump. That all of you people who support Bernie Sanders, you should be thanking Donald Trump and

Bernie Sanders. Trump supporters should be thanking Bernie Sanders, because both of these candidates are exposing the sham, the complete what I call the chitty chitty bang bang version of democracy. It's totally rigged, it's totally fixed. It's designed for one purpose. It's overly complex to keep any outsiders or insurgent, God forbid, anybody who's actually popular from breaking in to the houses of power in the United States. So this is our shout pole. I encourage you to go to twenty first

Century Wire. There's a link on the show page. If you're listening right now at the Sunday Wire. Go ahead and vote at that shout pole. And we've got some interesting comments. There's an interesting debate which is already forming inside the poll, which is great. This is why we designed it this way, why we like it this way, because you don't just vote, but you can have a debate at the same time. And so back to Jay Dyer. He's our guest in this final half hour Overdrive. Jay,

I'm gonna play you a clip. Okay, I'm gonna play you a clip of Donald Trump's son who was on CNN this morning. And basically I don't know if you'll be able to hear this clip. Jay, you might mute your microphone and listen online if you've got the browser open, or I'll just tell you Donald Trump Junior is basically calling out the whole delegate process, contested convention sham, basically for what it is being able to buy off delegates. Listen to this. I mean this is a kind of

an important rant. It's one of the most authentic. You know, sometimes you can tell if someone's authentic or not. I don't know what your ideas on this are, J, but you can tell if someone's talking from their heart, or if they're just reading off a political script. And I don't know if you've heard, if you heard his son talk at all, not know, he's interesting guy. I mean he might may may or not may not have a career in politics later. But I'll play this rant right now.

This is Donald Trump Junior this morning on CNN. Get a load of this. Been in at some point in your adult life, you've you've been in a bathroom or with a trans a transvestite or so called transgender person. I mean, they tend to be in big cities and it's like whatever, you know, you know, people going to the bathrooms to do their business and then they leave. Basically, it's but it's a rare it's a rare occurrence unless you're hanging out in certain unless you're living in Soho

or something. You know. It's just kind of a pointless debate in my opinion.

another level it is it is for a reason. It is not being talked about for no reason.

They're they're calling people like say that like you, me and ninety nine point nine nine nine nine nine nine nine rest of the population as cis gender, like almost like, oh, they're the ones, those cis gender people, they're the ones who have nominated to use the gender on their birth certificate. And I'm thinking to myself, no, I'm just a male. Yeah, well you know, or you're just a female. I mean, why you what's with the term cis gender? It's beyond you know, Well.

gender is a social construct, not real. So it's it's not sensical.

It's pretty much WWF. But it is illustrative that clip in showing the fact that the two party system is a scam because they would rather have, especially the neo conservative ideology that dominates the GOP for the most part, They would rather have Hillary because hillary ismenable to that than the at least the rhetoric of Donald Trump regarding things like NATO or Putin and borders and so forth. All of that rhetoric from Trump is contrary to the false two party systems game plan.

of that for many decades. And it's another example what we were talking about the previous hour of Once you kind of get to that level you figure out, you know that it's a scam. And at a certain time, the Koch brothers promote libertarianism because it's I have intageous to whatever their business interests might be. And in another time you want to promote collectivism, socialism, leftism, progressive at whatever terms, all of which is essentially meaningless because it's

all the same game plan. It's the same game plan, but it's a different rhetoric that they all speak during the campaign season and they go and vote for all the same gobbledygoot oligarchy.

the news. Personally, I think it's a red herring. This so called redacted twenty eight pages of intelligence reports from the nine to eleven Commission report and Saudi Arabia losing its immunity if you will, for lawsuits from the nine to eleven victims families and somehow insinuating that Saudi Arabia is behind the tax of nine to eleven. Now, what do you mean this first, Well, it's.

which is, who knows what's true in that regard? I mean some of it at the time of nine to eleven, right after the BBC reported that some of these people were completely fake. The BBC still has that story up of the completely manufactured hijacker. Now what does that indicate to us, not just that, but this whole hubbub of this twenty eight pages redacted nonsense. Well, again, it's a PC conspiracy theory. It wasn't the Saudis that told Norrad

to stand down. It wasn't the Saudis that were running US military drills up until nine to eleven, including Vigilant Guardian. It wasn't Saudi's that were offering the PENAC document, right, I mean, this is how ridiculous is this?

techniques and tools, and use certain regimes. And in this case, the Saudi Arabians have been useful in the last just fifty or sixty years.

He was a member of the Carlisle Group and embedded with the Bushes quite deeply, and he drew Saudi Arabia in many ways and their intelligence apparatus into this maze that was nine to eleven, the planning of it and the execution of it. And so right now there's sort of you know, compromised in public opinion because of that.

and the whole narrative itself is ridiculous. So you have the movies that come along later Flight ninety three or whatever that's supposed to fill in the gaps. And I think that for the mass public. That's what the Hollywood functions to do, as Chris has pointed out many times Poxbusters, is to fill in the gaps of people's interpretation of the news nuggets that they got.

of Saudi Arabia, in terms of geopolitics. Some people say, well, this is the establishment signaling that they're going to dump the Saudi. I don't think that's true. They're not going to dump the Saudis or anything.

to this. It's extraordinary. Actually, I don't believe your word that this guy is saying. Basically more of that Jay. So this Senator Graham a total insider, he's gatekeeping. Chuck Todd is so called journalist, is totally clueless about the line of bully that he's being spun on. And so this guy sits there in one hand, he makes sense. He starts out by saying, Jay, he says this, the hijackers couldn't have done this alone. Yeah right, okay, yeah, duh of course. And then at the same then he

goes and says that Saudi Arabia started al Qaeda. Now that's a little bit of an oversimplification. And so then he says that you know that, so basically, no US involvement, no CIA involvement in al kaya To, no handling, no Israeli intelligence involvement in the handling of some of these hijackers, as is easily proven just look at some of the

work by Peterdale, Scott and others. It's obvious. Okay, So this guy is here to divert and to create a kind of a goose wild goose chase for the for the press who basically don't know there, you know what from their elbow exactly on any issue, much less the maze that is nine to eleven basically.

over there, he did it. Oh this. So it's a never ending, like you said, a maze. It's a labyrinth that you'll never ever get to the bottom of. And that's because the most obvious culprits are the establishment itself, and it's and it really is that simple. You know. You just look at the panat documents, You look at all the people who were talking about the the the drills and the so forth that led up to nine

to eleven Richard Clark. You know, these big security so called experts, they're all neo conservatives, they're all they're all part of the same gang, the same gaggle.

United States? Nothing? What did Syria do to anybody? Pretty much? Nothing? Okay? So and then full sanctions Russia, full sanctions for what was meant to be MH seventeen, the downing of MH seventeen European sanctions. So if Saudi, if they had this evidence that Saudi Arabia did nine to eleven, there would be massive sanctions drop down on that country. I mean, they come and go as they please throughout the United States. That's a joke.

their research and look at their findings. I don't feel compelled to do a lot of that myself because I'm doing a whole broad range of other topics and areas so well.

got a fantastic segment lined up next week. I've got a guest, one of the best geopolitical analysts in my opinion, around, He's going to be joining us for a two hour segment. We're going to hit Africa, We're gonna hit everything in that segment. It's going to be definitely one not to miss. I'm Patrick Kennings and your host. Have a good day and we'll see you next week.