The Geopolitical Zeitgeist: The March Toward One Weird Order

noticed the first part. The first part was good, and then I was intentionally being silly with the chorus. Does anyone even know what I'm what I'm singing? Of course you don't, all of you uncultured rubes in the chat, particularly.

stuff serious all the time. Drumm me crazy. We're gonna be looking at a lot of different things today, a lot of samples of cultural degradation, a lot of samples of silliness. We're gonna work through some of the classic books. This is a recap stream we got to where we are. What the overall plan of the elites is not from dumb conspiracy books, but from writings of the elite themselves.

Before we do that, though, I want to show you what I'm talking about with how everything is going to make sense if you just understand everything's one bro.

capitalize on the nostalgia. Ten twenty years later, as their youthful audience become mommies and daddies and whatever and they grow up, it's time to capitalize on the establishment, I mean, on the on the nostalgia. I should say you came for Richard Simmons. Well, look, dude, you're gonna get everything and more today. I actually should have put Liam and Noel on the thumbnail. And I forgot to welcome to your initiation today is you're gonna be You're gonna be

seeing the world through my eyes. Let me show you the world in my eyes. Eater dirt. Does anyone know that one? Now, this was a fake video, but I thought it was funny because it's accurate. Did you guys see this is not a sile.

So no, come on, I'm not going to rehearse all this Vatican too Pope stuff because I don't I mean, how many times do we have to talk about that? So rather than talking about the theology. And what's interesting is that I used to see in comments with this papal stuff a lot of coping and a lot of attempting to explain it, and it would even maybe be half and half at times like maybe two, three, four

or five years ago. Now, the comments generally speaking, especially if you go over here to my video, my video which is Oasis Cast No Shadow Live at Never Worth part I'm just kidding over here at this this one, which I just did yesterday last night, the majority of the comments we're going to almost six hundred now, are in agreement that, okay, we can't defend this anymore. You've got a few pope's planners here and there, they're in

the total minority. Most of the quote pope planners are actually just weird profiles that keep spamming John Paul the second quotes that don't prove or just prove anything. They're just kind of irrelevant. And then you've got the usual like five or ten Roman Catholic comments of embrace the pope scuismatic, Well, why would I embrace the pope when

he's literally saying that as long as I pat to God. Now, if you doubt me, Again, these people, as usual have no reading comprehension, so they typically don't read the whole context with the whole quote. And it's not just these two documents. These are just two of the clearest. You can also look at the Romancalolic Catechism, which says the same thing. Summarizing the two. It doesn't say that they only think they have it. It says they with us adore the one merciful God, and they have the faith

of Amraham. You have to read both comments from both dogmatic statements. But again they have suddenly have reading comprehension problems when it suits them. Welcome everybody. We are doing a little bit of a geopolitical catchup, and I wanted to talk today again more broadly, more generally about how we got to where we are a lot of the books I've been reading lately and what my thoughts are on those. Why is the nineties coming back? I mean, these are kind of the the thought processes that I've

been having the last several months. And the reason I wanted to talk about end times to a degree is did you notice that a lot of the Roman Catholics, so Tim said, Hey, maybe it's the end times and since yesterday's papal statements, everybody's in a flurry. I mean, Roman Catholics are in a flurry. My dms are filling up, and I are going back and forth. We went back and forth all morning, I mean in a friendly civil way.

So we're going back and forth on will Vatican one and the pope and you know kind of pope be a heretic and all that, and blah blah blah. So I think I covered those quotes from Vatican One in yesterday's video, and I think I responded to the typical objection as like, look, Vatican one says that the pope and the office of the Pope and it's power to be the source of unity and continuity, and it's the source of public visible unity. That's Vatican one's argument the papacy, right.

It says in two places that that office will continue, quote until the end of time. It doesn't say it'll continue to the end of the world. And then there's this great apostasy. There's nothing in Vatican one about a great apostasy which allows for one hundred, two hundred years, fifty years, seventy years, whatever without a valid pope. And if you did admit that. Let's say we admitted or we went with a position of these apparitions that whether it's akita or whether it's a loss, let that there

could be a mass apostasy in the Roman Church. If we admitted that, then we're admitting that in the last days, the Roman Church and the Roman See loses its public visible unity. But that's one of its key four mark elements. One Holy Catholic I abstat right. So in their position, those constituent elements, which you'll read about in Roman Catholic theology, could never be lost. And what's the essential foundation of

the public visible unity the Roman Sea. So you see, it's actually impossible to say that the pope could defect, apostatize Rome, could lose the faith, et cetera, and be an adherent to Vatican one. It's and remember it's supposed to be simple. I mean, the argument of Vatican one is that it's supposed to be clear, simple and manifest that the Roman See is the sign of the one True Church.

and I'm not being rude or arrogant. It's just a lot of Roman Catholics don't read through those source documents. In Tim's case, he says, well, you know, I'm not primarily focused on dogmatic theology. I'm focused on philosophy. But now let me respond to this what about ism? Because a lot of the Roman Catholics of the point will say, well, you have a bad guy in Bartholomew. According to your own standards, you guys have elpeda fooros. You guys have

these bad bishops. The argument is not we don't have bad bishops.

the indefectibility and the inerrancy of the Roman See. The Roman See cannot teach error, whether publicly and dogmatically or in its normal, universal ordinary teaching, and even in its ordinary teaching, although it might error, you're still supposed to submit to that with docility. According to Lumgentium and the traditional Roman Catholic moral theology, it's your duty to submit with docility, even in the areas of Catholic theology that might be erroneous. It's not your place to go and

correct the pope. So with those principles in mind, it has nothing to do with saying that the Roman bishop is impeccable. Nobody made the argument that Roman Catholicism is false because we think the pope is impeccable and Roman cality seemed to Pope is impeccable.

a deflection. Nobody is saying that the Orthodox Church has bishops that don't err or that don't sin. It's that Catholic theology teaches that you can't be.

see that? It's that simple. So I don't understand why people don't get this argument. I don't know if they're intentionally misunderstanding the argument and just doing what about isms, because it's not a what about ism, it's critiquing the Roman Catholic theology internally and then saying we don't have that problem in the Orthodox Church. I mean, how do people know? This is the same stuff Lofton has been saying for years.

teacherrases too. Yes, but we don't hinge everything on one guy. So this is an interesting point too. That's raised about two quoke way and the question of double standards. So you have to be precise when something is too quoke way and when something is a double standard. So it really depends on what's being argued because This can be confusing.

It can be confusing because two quoke way is what Let's say somebody says, I say, hey, Lofton, the Vatican too teaching about the Roman scene never defecting shows that Pope Francis has defected and that therefore Roman Catholicism is not true. And then if Lofton said, what about your bishops that teach us, that would be a two quotue way because the question was given to him and he

responds with a question. But the problem, the reason that doesn't work is that I'm not bound by the logic of his system, right, I don't know the patriarch concept to nople is not a pope, even the pentarchy is not a pope. It's not a five headed pope. So you can't use your system to critique me, right, So that would be too two quotua. Well, what about your system.

You're a hypocritcause you have so the other position. That's not like when we're talking with Muslims and we're doing an internal critique and we say, in our theology and our system, it's not inherently contradictory to say that God is one and three. There's an equal ultimacy there, and then we say to the Muslim, likewise, you have and you have to give an account for Allah's many attributes in his essence the same metaphysical problem. Do you see.

That's a comparison between two systems and the internal standards amongst them. It's not a two quote wa because it depends on what the argument is. If the argument is that you have to justify your system on my system's grounds, right, or if the argument is are you using a double standard. For example, a Muslim will say something like liberal scholarship is my source and my proof for why the Bible's false. But then the same liberal scholarship which says that the

Quran is false is discarded. You see that? Yeah, so an internal critique not a too quick way exactly. Thank you inquisitor. That's what I'm trying to delineate here. And I'm glad this came up because somebody brought this up the other day with the Muslims, and I was like, you know, these are different positions, here are different things. Well, I don't know what I mean. Just to make this really simple, I mean, I'm not watching Sam stream, so

I don't know what he's arguing. But to make it really simple, like again, why would I be bound by the Roman Catholic idea of ecclesiology. Well, Sam has not read Vatican One yet. We just we were just talking about this. So that's why I told Sam he needs to read Vatican One. And I'm not being aggressive or trying to start a fight with Sam or anything. I love Sam. I'm just saying that. In the DMS, I said, hey, you need to if you're if you're interested in Catholicism,

you need to read this document about fifteen pages. And I said the same thing to Tim Gordon too, by the way, So I'm not telling Sam or Tim anything different than I'm telling the other ones. Every Roman Catholic should be familiar with these source documents if they want to be Roman Catholic or defindent position, because a lot of what's floating around today after this Francis debacle is a lot of people making arguments again not understanding Vatican One and what it says. So maybe we need to

rehearse Vatican One. Let's do that. By the way, if you want to support the stream, you can do so via super chats. So the first thing we're gonna note about papal teaching. And the reason I'm bringing this up is because I don't think Sam or Tim and I had actually had a discussion a DM on this about six months ago, so maybe Tim is aware of this now. I'm not sure what his position on this would be.

But first mistake we always have to correct with Roman Catholics is that they think that they're only bound by the papacy's extraordinary teaching, and uh, this is patently false. I remember when I was in the ssp X going to the Latin Mass. I used to think this. I used to think, like every trade cat does at some at some phase, Oh, I'm only bound by what what

the papist he says when it's extra ordinary. No, in fact, you're but you're bound by way more than that, and you're you're bound by the ordinary universal teaching as well. So let's see this. This is one site citation here

in the Vatican one. Wherefore, by divine Catholic faith, all those things are to be believe, which are contained in the Word of God, inscription, tradition, and proposed by the Church as matters of UH to be believed by dialed as divinely revealed, whether by solemn judgment or orderdinary and universal magisterium. So you understand that the solemn judgment is the ex cathedral extraordinary magisterium. Ordinary universal magisterium is also

dogma and must also be believed. So the necessary propositions to believe, be believed to be saved in Romancallay Church are much broader than a handful of extra ex cathedral statements. This is a classic mistake that Roman Catholics make. Let's give an example of this. Well, what's something that's ordinary magisterium? Saints? You cannot be a Roman Catholic and deny the sainthood of Alphonse, Segori, Augustine, whoever, because they end up being

confirmed by Rome obviously. And let's think of the conclusion. What would be the case if we could doubt sainthood in the Roman Caelly Church. Well, I could go back therefore in doubt all the saints. So the logic of the system would be undone if you could doubt sainthood in the Roman Calloic system. And that's why eventually Roman cala the elogists tended to say, uh, yeah, sainthood is magistrate, ordinary, universal magistrate. Let's see, because I think the statement is

said again. There's another statement about ordinary teaching. It might be in uh one of the encyclicals, but you get the point here, because it's still pointing out that you have to believe this. Now there's also Denzinger has two other statements. I might not be able to find these because I don't have mine. One of them is in the seventeen hundreds. If you look at Denzinger, let's see, it's the statement about you have to follow the Pope's dridical rulings as well. Where did I I've got that

saved somewhere. I don't remember which number it is. It's like seventeen seventeen ninety two. Ooh, I can believe. I remember that. So here's Denzinger seventeen ninety two. But seventeen ninety two is a repeat of Vatican one. This is the statement that we just read in Vatican one. And there's three more in Denzinger that state that you have to believe also beyond that the decisions of the Roman College as well. So it is in the eighteen hundreds.

I remember this much. It's getting into this. It's phrased something like there's also a condemned proposition. It's a condemned proposition that you only have to believe what is in the extraordinary teaching. I'm gonna find this because this is really important. I know where I put it. Let's see, is Vatican one infallible or about and two infallible? And I listed these underneath it. That's where it is I can believe remembered seventeen ninety two. Okay, we come down here.

This is this isn't This doesn't have the Denzinger statements, but it does have so Pius the twelfth and ce De la Gillis says that even if you think the pope is wrong, you're bound by his statements. Pius the eleventh and his encyclical Casti Kanubii. This condemns the proposition that you're only bound by what you think is quote magisterium. Let's pull that up. These are just real reaffirmations of the point that I was making. So it's Cassidy Kanubii

one four. I think it was. Therefore, let the faith will be on guard against the overrated independence of private judgment and the false autonomy human reason is quite foreign to the bearing of the name of Christians. Trust in his own mental powers to imagine that the Church, sent by God to guide and teach all nations, is not conversing with president affairs and circumstances, or that they must

obey only in the matters which has been decreed. Do you see this by solemn definition, as though her decisions might be presumed to be false or insufficient. Quite to the contrary, You are bound by all the teachings on faith and morals of the Roman Pontiff, not the ones that are only so called solemn dogma, right there Cassi Conubii one O four. And let me find the one about Roman college you are bound by. If I could think of of the wording of the way it's worded,

I could remember it. Let me look real quick at my book marks, because it might be there. I think I say it in book marks a long time ago, something like Roman Catholics are bound by more than extraordinary magisterium. What what I'm looking for is the two crucial Denzinger quotes,

because there's two more. One of them is a condemned proposition, probably from Cassidy Canubia, but one of them is I think, from the Syllabus of Errors, and one of them is from there was a question of whether you have to accept the pope's like juridical decisions. So like at the Pope says so and so is excommunicated, can you rebel against that? And the answer is no, you're also bound by his juridical decisions. Let's see if I can find.

see seventeen twenty two. But you are also bound by all of the other things. So sixteen eighty three is referencing seventeen twenty two. The obligation by which Catholic teachers and writers are absolutely bound is restricted only to the matters that are infallible and the dogmas. This is a condemned proposition seventeen twenty two. These are the condemned propositions

of Pious the ninth in the Syllabus of Errors. So it is a condemned proposition that a Roman Catholic is only bound by the infallible teachings of the Magisterium, and not the universal ordinary teachings, or not the ordinary teaching all right next one, sixteen ninety eight. Nor do they blush to profess and publicly openly the axiom and the principle of heretics from which various perverse opinions and errors arise.

For they repeatedly said that the ecclesiastical power is not, by divine right distinct from the civil power, and the distinction and independence of the civil power cannot be preserved without the essential rights of the civil power being invaded and unasserted by the Church. That's a quote from the liberals.

We cannot pass over in silence the boldness of those who do not endure sound doctrine and contend without sin, that with no loss of Catholic profess Yes, one can withhold assent the from obedience to the judgments and decrees of the Apostolic Sea. This is condemned. So the idea that you can be a good faithful Catholic and withhold your assent to the judgments and the disciplines the disciplinary

judgments of the Roman Sea is a condemned proposition. So you are condemned as a heretic if you believe that in the Roman Caloic Church. And so that's the other ones in Denzinger that I mentioned. Now, I know Denzinger, like Sam Shimoun, knows the Koran and the Haydiths. So anybody who wants to discuss these topics, I'm more than willing to have any kind of dogmatic Roman Catholic discussion. Again, I know these texts like he knows the Kuran and the Hadiths, so I'm more than willing to do any

kind of deep dive anybody wants on these issues. But as you can see, I gave you four Densinger references and Casti KANUBII, so if you want the numbers. Densinger sixteen eighty three, Dinsinger sixteen ninety eight Dinzinger seventeen twenty two. Dinzinger seventeen ninety two. Castiy Kanubii one O four Vatican one, Chapter three, Section eight, clear as day. That's why we always say to the Roman the Tradcats, you can't reject Vatican two. It doesn't matter if it's called a pastoral council.

It's confirmed by the Apostolic Sea, it deals with faith and morals, and it's for the entire Catholic Church. There you go. You have to believe it. You can't reject Vatican two if you're a Catholic. Anyway, how many times have we talked about this, like a million? I mean I've been literally been sitting here covering Denzinger and trad at copes and doctrines for how many years? And you notice every time they come to debate, they get demolished and they run off and cry and they won't debate,

or they just boot me from their streams. So that's why I don't go in their streams. Okay, but I wasn't really planning on now. By the way, Yeah, everybody should be aware of mortalium animus, because that's one of the other really crucial documents in this and people should read this if they haven't, because it's really the clearest condemnation. That's the latest condemnation of this stuff from the Vatican.

So the last time that the Vatican made a really explicit rejection of multi faith interfaith gatherings that I'm aware of was the nineteen twenty eight I guess it's an encyclical of pious the ninth I means give me eleventh nineteen twenty eight Pis eleven, the Mortalium Animos, and the whole document it's.

or allow its members to engage in interfaith gatherings. This whole document, clear as day, is a condemnation of interfaith gatherings, and it's very famous, it's very well known. You know what Roman Catholics say, Oh well, it wasn't dogma. Oh but it doesn't have to be dogma for you to follow it. It only has to be normative teaching. Certainly, the popes and cyclicals are ordinary universal normative teaching. In this case, the pope is speaking on faith and morals.

He is speaking as the successor to Peter, to the entire church. Who's it written to the patriarchs, the primates, the arch bishops, the bishops in communion with the whole with the absociate the whole world on religious unity. The whole document is a condemnation, and it says that if you engage in inter faith gatherings, you are an apostate.

You have left the Christian faith. You are no longer remember the mystical body, because you have surrendered what is a fundamental doctrine of Christianity, which is that Christ is the only way to be saved. So anybody who wants to come debate these topics again, I know these documents, like Sam knows the Quran and knows how des I mean, I'll go all day long with Denzinger. I mean, you have seen my Denzinger, right, I've read Denzinger. I'm not

trying to be rude. I don't think Tim or Sam even have Denzinger, So they're not this is not a position that they're in that they're ready to debate. That would be like me saying I'm gonna go debate Sam Shamun on the on the Quran, and I'm gonna win. I don't know, I know these I was an insane trad cat for ten years. I lived this, I breathed this. I dare say nobody knows the trad cat ins and

outs in the internet sphere better than me. I mean, there might be some nerd who spent more time in these stupid documents, but when it comes to executing the arguments, I dare say that there's not a trad cat out there that could really hold up to this, because I mean, if you took if you take this stuff seriously, you're going to you know, immerse yourself in all these doctrines and documents. How long was I sspx orceta so I got I started reading Romancolic stuff in two thousand and one.

I came into the Roman Church two thousand and three. I was pretty quickly at trad I didn't really know what was right about who was and wasn't pope in two thousand and three. I read the first set of a conscious book in two thousand and four or five, but I wasn't convinced of it. I just thought, well, there's all these different types of positions that you could

have on the Vatican. It took me a couple more years before I started leaning more and more to think that John Paul the scond was not a valid pope. But I mean I was still just if you're in the SSPC, you just kind of you just kind of set that issue aside because you think, well, there's not much I can do about it. I'm going to the Latin Mass. It's even the Vatican admits that, you know,

the Latin Mass is like valid sacraments. So if you're in the SSPX side position and you just kind of don't spend a whole lot of time worrying about it and you just go to the Mass, right, but it kind of wears at you and you start thinking, well, but how's this SSPX position actually tenable? And I didn't really think about the SSPX position being untenable until I was confronted with the question of universal ordinary magisteriums. In other words, this Vatican One teaching that you have, you're

not just bound by the dogmas. I mean that undoes this right here sixteen ninety eight that an that ends the SSPX position. The whole SSPX position is premised on rejecting John Paul the Second's excommunication of le Fever. But clearly sixteen ninety eight says you don't have the right to reject a papal excommunication. You must follow the pope and the Roman see the Roman College in their juridical decisions.

And so if that's the case, bye, by the SSPX, you guys are the definition you are in the Roman system, the definition of schismatic. So if the SSPX goes, really the only logical position is to say, out of a contestm right like. And for a long time I still went to the SSPX because they had valid sacraments, even though in my personal opinion was that by that time Benedict wasn't a valid pope. But there's nothing I could do about that. So it's more important to get valid sacraments.

So I went to the Latin mass from about two thousand and four until two thousand and eight ish. Anyway, I wasn't really planning on And by the way, why does everybody want to like, why do you want to defend all this stuff? Like is it not time to give this stuff up? The other thing people don't realize too, is h And I noticed this in the Abara debate.

Remember going back to the Abar debate. Remember when I was debating Abara and I said, Eric, I'm here, I want to debate pre Vatican two and post Vatican two teaching. And Eric said, Jillo wanted to debate the papacy stacking up historical case examples. But what I was trying to do was argue the system, the system right. And Eric wanted to argue in an evidential way that if you could pile up enough so called evidences for the Vatican one mindset of the papacy, then isn't it likely that

maybe Vatican one papacy is possible? And my argument was, well, if Vatican pre Vatican too and post Vatican two theology contradicts, that's all I need to invalidate the whole system. I only need one dogmatic contradiction to invalidate that system, because that system, said the Romans. He cannot teach error, there cannot be a contradiction in dogma. So their own system has set themselves up for this fall. You know, don't you don't understand this, and don't you think that. I mean,

I'm not making this. This doesn't prove anything because it could be wrong, right, I could be wrong. I could have missed some piece of data or something. But I've already been through this, Like I did this whole thing in the two thousands, all the what everybody's going through right now. I already did this stuff, like I lived in Denzinger and the Tsuma and in the you know, Latin Church Fathers and the Catechism of Trent, and I

lived and breath this. I actually bought the tanor alberta Goo official Jesuit version to volume, multi hundred dollars set of the Roman Catholic commitical Councils. I bought all of the papal and cyclicals that I had access to. There was one papal in cyclical set that was like five hundred dollars, like Afford. It was all the papal encyclicals from like the seventeen hundreds up till today. Or something. But I read all five or six hundred pages of

Lee of the Thirteen's and cyclicals. I read all of the Masonic encyclicals. I've read all of the encyclicals in Popes against the Modern Errors. I've read many of the encyclicals of Piss of twelfth and Piss the eleventh. I've read majority of Piss a tenths works that are in English, and the cyclicals. I read all Denzinger multiple times. So like, I know this realm now again, doesn't mean I have every I could be wrong about some minutia of Catholic doctrine.

That's true, because I don't I'm not in that world anymore. I don't care about it anymore except for the purpose of apologetics and so forth. So there could be some like, oh, you didn't know that canon law actually says this on page paragraph for four hundred and thirty two whatever, So yeah, maybe there's something minutia, but like, the main issue is here, I'm not wrong about this, Like I know this very well.

So in the case that people like Sam or Tim, you know, look, it's always an open door to come chat. You can always come talk about this stuff. It does have to be a debate. People want to have a conversation. But this is what I mean this. I know this this feeling too, because look.

that as a mistake you made. But the problem is that the mistakes that are being made are actually on the basis of things in Vatican two, right, And there's no way that a person who is a Christian and believes the teaching and understands what Islam says could say that the plan of salvation includes those who acknowledge the Creator, the first of whom is the Muslims who profess to hold the faith of Abraham and along with us, adore

the One merciful God. In Hinduism, men contemplate the divine mystery and seek a flight to God with love and trust. I'm paraphrasing. So if it had not set in Hinduism the demonic system, you might could salvage that quote if it had not said. And by the way, it's not just it says. It says that Muslims with us. With Catholics, they say, I'm not a Catholic.

actions tell you what they think. And I don't have a problem saying that whatever patriarch went to the Assisi gatherings, he's just as much a heretic. Right, So what about the interfaith center in Russia? So Putin kissing the Quran is not the equivalent of the pope kissing the Quran. And I totally agree that this is just as bad

as what Francis does. But again, in the Orthodox system, it's a decentralized church, right, so if a patriarch apostatizes, or if a patriarch commits error heresy, it doesn't undo the system. Yeah, but again you can put up quotes the Orthodox we have been criticizing and refuting acumenism for how long? So all this point, all this shows is that the Orthodox Church has ecumenism as a danger. The

Romancaloity Church has ecumenism, the Protestants have ecumenism. But what's at root the problem here is which ecclesiology is invalidated by this? So they're trying to take what aboutisms about the fact that you have problems in your church of ecumenism, and so do we. Yeah, but the difference is that

the Orthodox we could lose all the patriarchs. Like let's say all the patriarchs went to some city for meeting, and let's say that a comment destroyed all five patriarchs, all six whatever, however, I mean, you know what I mean, Like, so the five patriarchs minus Rome. Let's say Rome was Let's say all of the patriarchs get get destroyed by a comment oh, I guess the Orthodox Church doesn't exist

anymore because we don't have the pentarchy. The pentarchy is a system that's accepted gradually over time, by the fifth sixth seventh century. If it's something that is accepted by the fifth sixth seventh century, the pentarchy five, then obvious is not essential to the church. If it didn't exist in centuries one, two, and three. Christians were being saved in the first, second, third century without the pentarchy, weren't they. So pentarchy is something that's a canonical development. It's not

essential to the church. It can be normative, but conceivably every patriarch it could apostatize. I'm not saying every patriot has apostatized, but canon law and all of this. It operates different in the Orthodox Church than it does in the Latin Church. In the Latin Church, there's certain sins that ipso facto excommunicate you. For example, if you procure an abration in Roman Catholic canon law, to procure an abrastion automatically excommunicates you from the Roman Catholic Church.

laatees sententia and ipso facto mean. Ipso facto, by the very fact, by the very fact of worshiping in the mosque towards Mecca, you, ipso facto, have rejected the Christian faith. And in Catholic theology, how can the pope be the head of that which he is not a member? How can the bishops be heads of that of which they are not members? And you say, well, this is an argument set as mate. So either the argument is true or it's false. The source of the argument is irrelevant.

That's a genetic fallacy. Well, I don't like suns, so you're using their arguments. So I mean you guys use Aristotles first cause arguments Aristol is a pagan? So should I throw out all of Aristotle because he's a pagan? So you see, you don't utilize the same standard as Catholics when you complain about oh you use tag? Is Greg Bunsen was a Cotus used tag. So the argument stands on its own regardless of whether Greg Bonson said or not. So likewise, either it is an ipso facto

removal or it's not. Let's see if that's I'm pretty sure that's still in the new code of canlaw. Here's the example of abration.

immediate excommunication by that act. A person who attempts to confers sacred orders upon a woman incurs latte sentence excommunication. So you'll notice there's many actions and sins. Now why am I showing this because in Roman Catholic canon law, this is their can in law. Not all sins are equal, not all sins incur the same penalty. If you have a dirty thought about a woman, you're going to confess that. But it does not LATAs sententia automatically excommunicate you from

the visible Church of Christ. In Roman Cavol Canon law, all the sins that you're seeing listed here in actions are examples where it does do that. So this is talking about various invalid ordinations. If a person tresn't ordain somebody out of accord with what's accepted, it's an automatic ex communication. If a cleric attempts to get married, he incurs an automatic excommunication. Anyone look at this Canon thirteen ninety seven. To any person who procures an abraustion is

latae sententia automatically excommunicated? Again, do you understand that latte sententiae ipso facto means that you don't have to have the church officially say I pronounced Bob Smith excommunicated. The very word means by the action itself. That's why it says any apostate or heretic or schismatic is automatically excommunicated from the calolgy church.

punch Pope Frank, you get automatically communicated. That one was a funny one. I didn't nextally know that abration. That one I knew was lates inentence. I did not know that if you try to ordain a woman, you're automatically communicated. Didn't know that one. So there you go. So here's the present day. This is the nineteen eighty three code of kendlaw. I'm pretty sure. So they can't say, well, this is the nineteen seventeen code. Is not the nineteen

thirty dude, this is not the nineteen eighty three code. No, this is the nineteen eighty three code. So it continues. I'm going to make sure it's the nineteen oh three code. Yes, here it is presentation of the new code Kennala in nineteen eighty three. So all the possible copes and explanations and talking around all this nonsense, they're just counting on you guys, not knowing that this is what they teach. And is this not obvious that not all the sins

are the same? I mean, do they not know this? Do they think that? So here is the link to their canon law and you can see right there right away thirteen sixty four. Right away, if you commit the sins of heresy, skiz them an apostasy, you're automatically out of the Roman Church. That means the decades of popes committing all these interfaith gatherings and actions which Mortalian animos said is a surrendering of the faith. Are Italian minimos

are themselves tic, schismatics and apostates? And why is that? Because of the decrees of Vatican two. By teaching that all the religions are paths to God, you can be saved in Hinduism, Muslims out of the faith of Abraham. Muslims adore the same God as us. Adoration is worship, not just a mental recognition, it's actually worship, and so Francis is not doing anything new when he says what

we say. Now again, I absolutely agree. I absolutely agree with Sam and anyone else who critiques the Ecumenists and the Orthodox Church. I guess what, I've been doing podcasts for years talking about the Ecumenism and the Orthodox Church and calling it out and opposing it and calling out Bartholomew as a bad man. Why should I? I mean, I have talked to Sam in private about this, but people are talking publicly. I'm gonna reply publicly, and I'm

not mad at Sam again. Man Like Sam's experience with Islam going back to the late nineties is my experience with Catholicism going back to the late nineties and the year two thousand. I first started reading Catholic stuff in two thousand. So this is not this is my world. Why do you think the track can take me so much? Because I go, I know the documents, their documents better than them. No, you don't know a Quitas better than I don't care about Aquinas. I'm talking about their dogmas.

The documents and the dogmas. Roman Catholicism is not Aquinas. Roman Catholicism is the dogmas. That's what you're supposed to follow. That's what the religion is.

new calendar. This superchat is to underscore that the streams today is a festal message the Cross of Christ. Users in the joy the whole universe. Do not let any evil sygh ops rob you of that joy exactly. Now, let's get away from all this theology stuff and stop trying to get me to argue with Sam in the chat. Sam's gonna have to work through these issues at his pace. There's always an open door to talk about this stuff. I'm not going to do any interactions with William Aubricks.

I actually think he's worse than Loften. I would interact with Loughton before I'd interact with all So, uh, you know Sam can deal with this when Sam is ready to deal with it.

not serving the American population at all. It's serving a political elite class in Washington, who has a certain business ventures and geopolitical ventures, money laundering ventures through the Ukraine. Neocons, other foreign governments and foreign nations are benefiting from this Ukraine situation. No one here has benefiting from it. And

again it's just sort of escalating. And the problem is that because if they perceive that they can't convince America that commommunism or comma munism is legit, they're going to up the ante to make sure that there's not an election. And I'm not saying that I worship don Trump. He's going safe as I'm happy to criticize Trump. I've always been pretty critical of I mean, overall, he's obviously better than Kamala, but we know it's you know, it's just

limited what a president could even do. But we saw that the neo conservative Democrats have had a tremendous hand in the last four years in destroying the country. They're very effective at doing that, and I do not believe they are incompetent. I believe they are malicious, and so they could very well use this situation as the means by which there's not going to be a normal stolen re election. Trying to choose by words carefully on thank

you on YouTube because we don't know what. Like, I noticed that YouTube was removing a lot of health related videos. So that was making me think they're going to continue with some form of like coof Coove part two. But but but that's been really quiet, right, coof part two has been they've been pretty quiet about that. There was some talk of monkey pox, monkey pocks. You'll always be home, sweet Home to me, good old monkey pucks, monkey pox ten.

ecclesiology and the Roman Catholic one. So anyway, Yeah, I don't really think that monkey pox was a viable that didn't seem to go over. So now it seems like they're shifting back towards talking about the threat of Russia again and war with Russia and all this kind of stuff is like back on on the forefront. So it's they keep going back and forth. Right now, keep in mind, as we've been pointing out, there could also be economic problems. Right,

we might move into an economic collapse. Right, that could be one of the cards that occurs. Some people say, well, they wouldn't do that intentionally because they want to keep milking this system, and they why would they roll out an economic collapse. Well, one reason to roll out an economic collapse could be to bring in the new system. So if they're ready to bring in UBI and all of that, an eco collapse could be very useful for that.

But again war could also be useful that. But also keep in mind, you could have a double triple it up. You could have an eco collapse and war and some other you know scenario. You could have monkey pocks getting loose and then they say the Russians did it, and then this collapses the economy.

all the time. What's the solutions? Get out of these big blue cities if you can. I don't think we have to try to leave the country. I mean, you guys have heard this crazy capital game bill that she wants, and I keep hearing conflicting things because they say, oh, kamal unism. Kamala's capital gains tax is only for those with like an over one hundred million. But you see, you can't trust these websites because they'll lie about what

her actual policy is. By the way, hey, if you notice her policy changes from day to day, New York itself will face a forty three percent capital gains tax. We're getting into like France levels of socialism here with us. This is crazy. So they I heard, oh, seventy percent if it's on above one hundred million. You know what's funny is that how comes she doesn't just have her policies on a website, you know what I mean, Like,

why wouldn't you put your policies on a website? Well, I think one reason she doesn't do that is that she doesn't want you to actually know because her policy literally changes from day to day. She just literally says whatever she wants in front of an audience. So like there's not even a reliable place to see what her actual capital gains plans are because I don't think she

wants it. Bernie Sanders criticized it. Well, if Bernie Sanders criticizing your socialism, why am I seeing twenty eight percent? Because literally, like two weeks ago, it was seventy percent, So where's this twenty eight coming from? Even twenty eight is crazy? Yeah, it'll destroy housing, that's absolutely correct. I mean this will destroy the economy. Like if she brings a seventy percent capital gains tax or even a twenty eight percent an unrealized gains, do you understand how crazy

that is? That's insane. That's that will destroy the economy, And how would you even enforce that. So if I bought a house five years ago and I bought it for two hundred thousand dollars, and it's worth four hundred thousand dollars I owe the government two hundred thousand dollars. I would have to sell the house to pay the unrealized capital gains. And if everyone in the country has to do that, no one would be able to afford selling and buying anything the whole country. This is so crazy,

the country would collapse. That's literally insane. And then there's all these websites. She's not going to do the No, she's not, but you can't find an actual clear statement as to what she actually wants and what she actually will do. Kamala plans to raise corporate tax to thirty five percent. She wants a forty five percent long term capital gains tax, highest since nineteen twenty two.

bought an antique car. Yeah, it'll it'll just really it literally collapse the co tree like there's no I mean, i'd be I'd be thinking about running down there to them Mosquito Coast with that with Tristan. Right, I'm run down there with Harrison Ford and Tristan or to damn Mosquito Coast or something. That'd be time to leave the country anyway. I don't actually think there is even a there's not a real there's no place where you can go read Kamala's policies.

So this is basically just socialism. And that's because her idiot followers think that a person with a million dollars is rich when that's the person who basically runs the small business that you work at. So this means more consolidation and everything being at Walmart and Target, and Amazon and you lose your job. So this will destroy even more what kof destroyed of the middle class. Make rent more affordable. How is the federal government going to make

people make rent affordable? This is so ridiculous. She will provide first time home buyers with twenty five thousand dollars from where Where does this twenty five thousand dollars from Kamala come from? Oh, it's from the taxpayers socialism. So Kamala is going to take from the tax paying part of the country and give it to first time home buyers which means people from people from El savad or Ecuador HATI in other words, new visitors to America. You

know what I mean? Take on bad actors. What does that mean? She's going to go after b movies. She will take on big pharma to lower drug costs. This is repeating what Donald Trump did in his first term. So this is just a borrowed from Donald Trump, who in the right mind believes that Kamala is going to take on big farm Are you kidding? Like the Democrats are literally owned by big pharma. What else is Kamala gonna do? Trump's Project twenty twenty five? Trump isn't part

of this, which is unfortunate. So this isn't even true. Trump should have been part of that. The only way out of this is something like this, going in the direction of twenty twenty five. I mean, this country will collapse if we don't go in that direction. The blue haired freaks and their zillion dollar backers are going to destroy this country. Affordable education in other words, sending your offspring to be made into blue haired freaks at the university.

So student debt relief, so basically more socialism where people who are tricked into going to universities to get brainwashed then have to pay two hundred thousand dollars for their brainwashing sessions for four years, and then Kamala will tax the rest of the country to forgive their debts. So socialism social low energy through climate crisis. So she wants to join us to the COP twenty eight agenda stuff,

and that's going to make the climate fix. The temperatures will go down by what by green energy and sustainability. All of this green energy and sustainability actually is way more expensive, which will mean that everything goes up for you. So literally, like every policy that we've looked at from her is just a form of socialism, a form of further destroying the country. By the way, do you notice so she cares about workers. Is there anything about the borders.

Do you see anything about borders here? Because that might have something to do with defending the country and the workers. Interesting, so like the number one threat to the country, and there's no mention of that here. But of course there's going to be abrations for your art hold daughters here. Okay, make our communities safe from gun violence. Okay, so get rid of the guns. And then she put Trump's twenty

twenty five agenda again. Okay, where let's see she put it on the She put it on here three times, stand up to dictators. It's like this is written by like a fifth grader or something. Uh So, her actual policies are basically just socialism and Trump's bad. Okay, So there's that. If you want to support the show, you can do so via stream labs. The stream labs link

is how we do super chats over here. Now on neck Herds, we've already talked about the papacy there, like how many we don't have to beat a dead horse. I'm not going to talk about the papacy all day, Like I have been telling you guys that Francis is a ridiculous person since he became pope. In fact, you want to know what The first review I ever did was on the internet, The first and the first one I got paid for. The first podcast was with I'm not even going to say the ridiculous person, but it

was on the election of Pope Francis. It was right after Francis was elected. That was my very first online It was an online conference and I got paid like two hundred dollars for I thought it was like hot shit forgetting two hundred dollars for doing an online conference. And I did a breakdown of Francis. So let's see exactly when that was, because then I can tell you exactly how long I've been doing Internet stuff, like public audio stuff. I mean, I was doing writing articles before this,

but my first like twenty thirteen. So my first public internet conference lecture that I got paid for was twenty thirteen, and I talked about Francis and his background. So so what is this twenty twenty four, twenty four, So this is eleven years of public talking, not talking about writing articles to public public yapping.

month we have over here seven thousand. By the way, guys, if you don't follow me on Twitter, please do, because we're gradually I think in the next best case scenario, the next a couple of months, I could hit one hundred thousand on Twitter. So that will be a party. Libration will have one hundred thousand k on Twitter party. There's my Twitter. If you don't follow me, be sure to follow me there and help me get to hunter k. We'll have our one hundred k Twitter party over here

and we'll recap all the great highlights and moments. I also want to kind of talk about this because I'm seeing this pop up a lot more. Certainly a TikTok is pushing this trend. In the algorithm. Have you heard of this deconstruction thing, deconstructing my Christianity? It seems to be very popular amongst Evangelicals, and I don't know exactly understand what this is. It's most of these people become atheists, but they go through what they call the deconstruction of

their Christianity. I first heard this from a Lutheran doing some Skittles podcast a few years ago, and he was talking about deconstructing his faith. Once I went through the process of my deconstruction, I understood that what I believed really made no sense. And I'm like, what is this Deacons? Are they talking about Jacques Deidah and deconstructionism. I'm assuming it has some reference to deconstructionism. Now none of these

people know what that is. Uh So I wanted to since this has been popping up everywhere suddenly, and by the way, you'll notice, algorithms feed you stuff to influence you. So out of nowhere, I typed in my name just to see what was going on on TikTok because I'm not over here a whole lot. I don't have a huge TikTok following, but I typed in to see what would come up when you put in my name and

you start getting deconstructing my Christianity videos. When you typed in my name, I was like, Wow, this is crazy. So the algorithm is feeding anti Christian and pro atheist stuff to people that click my name. So I wanted to let's see what this is, because I still don't really understand what they mean.

you means that you're being manipulated. But certainly revival preachers preachers in general, especially in the evangelical sphere, they know and have perfected a lot of time techniques of human psychological manipulation. And you can watch the Margo documentary to see that in one case of a con man who admitted to doing.

but these things can happen anywhere and everywhere. But I do think they're more prevalent in the world of evangelicalism because so much of that is based on subjective feelings, experience, and not on external objective doctrines, history, dogma, et cetera. If it's all based on like the subjective, you're gonna get this kind of a situation going.

to me but to other people. And then, a big thing that I have always grappled with is the idea that homosexuality is oh.

people who deconstructed were pridefully trusting themselves rather than trusting God. Oh, of course I see things differently now. I don't speak for everyone who's deconstructed or is deconstructing, but I do think that it's helpful because there's so much talk about it, to hear from somebody who's sort of been through the process, because I think we can all understand one another a

little bit better. My deconstruction didn't start with the decision to lean on my own understanding, and honestly, it felt a lot like the opposite of that.

these people were told that it was. And this is the danger of these This is the problem with heresy. Heresy and all this stuff produces these angry, bitter people because heresy is really an inauthentic delusion. It's not just something wrong, but it promotes delusion, and it promotes the false idea of what it is, and then it creates all these train wrecks as a result.

kind of stuff? I think she's trying to be funny too, which is it's not actually funny.

But in reality, you're becoming a fool. And what happens is that you don't even realize that the very things you're saying are contradictory to say that you can never tell people they're wrong and that you're a bigot. If you try to tell other people are wrong, you're being a bigot because you're telling people they have to be relativists.

has a new album after nine years. I mean, I don't know what is going on, but as there's good signs as well as bad signs, I don't know what that. Everything is just so crazy. It's just all weird timing though we're in the nineties again. Somehow we're in some sort of cern alternate dimension where the nineties are back, but it's also apocalyptic almost. I don't know.

Because I remember time in my life where I was a Christian and when somebody would ask me why I followed God, I would say the same thing because of the things that he brought me through, the things that he gave me strength to endure.

think that's part of it. Of course, they're just gonna say, well, if God can provide and guide the church to preserve the scriptures, and if God can preserve tradition, he can preserve a hope. Yeah, he could do that. But the question is is that the governance that he chose for the church, And if so, why are there's so many counter examples in the history of the Church that really really only a few one or two counterexamples should undo

the people claims about it. So if patar are ten dollars, the Orthodox pray to the saints, Yes, we believe in the intercession of saints. Watched the argument that I have with the guy at the beginning of yesterday's five hour line stream. Jesus said, did not pray to the dead Jesus mediator, Well, the saints are alive to God. They're not dead. That's why Jesus says Abraham is not dead

but lives to God. In the Book of Revelation five, six, seven, eight, the Saints are seen interceding and praying and bon Jovie in nineteen twelve fifty dollars, Thank you so much, Jay I'm sure you've discussed this, but would Catholicism just be another form of utopianism putting the pope as god man

on earth. This has been criticized. It was the criticism ultimately of Dostoevsky in the famous Grand Inquisitor chapter, that the earthly geopolitical power turned to the papacy, the Tomma Grigorn reforms has resulted in a earthly power based religion, which is a form of utopianism. And so that's actually the entire point of Dostievsky's Famous Inquisitor chapter. So he was making that argument. Saint Justin Popovich echoes that in his critique of the papacy as well as the key

example of Renaissance humanism. So yes, faith, faith in life in Christ by Saint Justin Popovich and the Grand Inquisitor make that point, bon Jovi exactly. Now, I don't think we're exactly there yet to where Roman Catholicism is literally just this attempt at a utopian building of the Kingdom of God on earth. But the seeds have been there, and if you know, he continues in the path that it's on, which I don't see how how it could

be otherwise. I mean, the only thing I could see is that it it, it goes away and converts to Orthodoxy, and then whoever doesn't convert the Orthodoxy real Orthodoxy is the Roman thing becomes this other world religion. That's Chris lom new Agu something emotional appeal, Gordon one dollar. You

cannot reject the papacy. Well, that's funny because even the papacy admits that the Orthodox Church, which has rejected the papacy for one thousand years, has maintained his existence as believers in the true Faith, in the One True Gospel and so forth. So how have we maintained our existence for a thousand years if we can't do that without the pope? Patar five dollars? Is a baptism require for salvation Orthodoxy? Yes, salvation is not a one time sinner's

prayer thing. It's an ongoing thing throughout your life. Any Montese one dollar. I'd like to see you and Sam interact and have a debate. Well, I mean, I don't want to have a falling out with Sam. I love Sam. I don't want to see him go in the wrong direction, even if he chose to go to the Alicism. I still be friendly with him. I'm friendly with Tim Gordon, but we don't have to debate to have a discussion about these topics. Squad ten dollars. Do you know what

glass beat is? Can you give your two cents on it? I don't know what that is? But is this getting into something dirty or something? I don't know what that is? Jake Burnet's one dollar. What is the imminent threat to America's success in the near future? The most imminent threat? It's all of them together, right, I mean, it's like the lack of enforcing the laws that already exist.

politicians can actually effectively do this. I'm not spent enough time listening to Kamala to really pay attention. But she probably is an idiot, but she could be more cunning and be playing the dumb facade to get away with more stuff at Flora. Ten dollars do work, Jay, this is kind of work. I mean, I'm starting to get a headache from all these goobers and goofballs. I don't know if I could take much more of that. I still haven't figured out or heard a clear answer as to what deconstruction is.

know what I mean. So they're basically just spinning back out what other TikTokers are saying.

it is. Oh dude, look at this dude, do looking rough bro lay Off, the lay Off, the Mad Dog twenty twenty and the Virginia slams bro a.

every one. Oh of course, this woman, this wine mom over here, Wonda dam Nirvana shirt I dig instracting my acresianity.

and Christianity is basically oppressing everyone. I mean, yeah, if you were at some weirdo evangelical sector cult, it probably was oppressing people. I totally agree. Okay, I can't take any more of this. This is too like just low tier stuff. King of hellas three dollars. Will there be a breakdown of society and chaos socially in order to establish a world or I think that it's almost inevitable and inescapable. I don't really see how well without large

scale shocks to the system, control chaos, engineer chaos. What was the arc of crisis? The Brazinski model? It seems like that's almost always necessary because there's never a smooth transition into oh hey, everyone just get the UBI. It seems like the system benefits and capitalizes always on a crisis. So if you read most of the global elite texts, how do they always begin their books? We are in a crisis? Crisis crisis crisis. Ours is a time of crisis,

all the crises. They always hype this up, and usually their crises are manufactured or exaggerated, or mayven not existent. Climate change is going to destroy the world, you know, this kind of stuff. Therefore we must enact total socialism. Jake Burnet's five dollars. What is your response to skittles when they are born this way? I say, girlfriend, you just better crank up that lady, God got tune, because I'm saying it with you, girl, That's what I say.

Is there any research on this well, saying that you're born with something like that? First of all, there's no way to prove that. So it's an assertion. If you go back to people like Kinsey. A lot of the claims of Alfred Kinsey are the basis for the turns out everyone is skittles. Did you know Alphred Kinsey did a bunch of studies that were violations of human rights, by the way, within this I mean, even if you don't believe in human rights, within the system, what they

say is human rights. Alfred Kinsey violated all that with his disgusting stuff that he did and his publications. Because the basis to say, well, then you know, everybody's faking gray. Literally, everyone is faking gray on a spectrum, but only some of us are like, you're like four percent fake and gray, people like RuPaul eighty percent faking gray, ninety percent taking gray. But everyone is fake and gray. We're all on a spectrum.

So my assumption, my guess, would be that it all goes back to Alfred Kinsey's fraudulent studies and his degeneracy. But Alfred Kinsey has been exposed as a front. Remember John Money. Who's John Money? John Mayer body is one man.

heard his name. I forget who's the producer for. I just watched his video because it popped randomly yesterday, and he said, have you noticed there's no more bands anymore? Now? Obviously I don't mean literally there's no bands.

not really feasible to have bands anymore. And he pointed out something like there's only three bands in the top whatever of the charts nowadays, and I don't know, I'd never heard of any of the three that he listed, But so this is an interesting development for where music has gone. So music has gone into this direction of I'm not saying there's no bands, he's saying that the

charts are dominated by single solo artists. That the system and the record industry whatever's left of that, that's really what they promote now. So it was an interesting video.

I obviously I don't really keep up with the music industry because it seemed like music, and it was pretty it was pretty much dead like ten fifteen years ago, right, Wasn't it pretty much like going away because pretty much all of the musicians were figuring out, Okay, I gotta have my own website and people just are gonna download this stuff. So the only way to make money is to tour, like the bands figured that out like fifteen years ago.

Billie Eilish or Taylor Swift. That's what he's saying. Ooh, interesting points since their hypocrite is dead internet theory applicable to all of the other cultural institutions. Mmmm hmm interesting, Oh, Tam and Paula is one guy I thought he I thought he had a band. I didn't even know that. I mean, I have the albums. I just assumed that he had like backup or whatever. But you know what Ed Cheran is this Ed Seron doesn't have a band. I don't care for Ed Scheron, but Jamie really likes

Ed Shearon. I want to go. Wanted to go to the concerts, so I bought her tickets a few months ago. And what was interesting was that it's just him and his like loop machine, right, so all the songs are him. He did have like a couple of artists join him for a collab, but it wasn't a backup band. So even Ed Sheeran is like just one dude. Go check

out my video I did on dead Internet theory. It's a kind of an extreme sort of I think I see dead internet theory as more of a well, would you say, more of a thought experiment, But there's some truth to it, because the idea is it seemed like around twenty fifteen sixteen, the internet seemed to really change. Part of that, of course, was that Google and the big tech companies the algorithm changed because of the drama around the twenty sixteen election, right, Russia Gate and all that.

But the theory of internet theory goes further and says, what if the Internet was largely flooded with AI and bots at that time and that also contributing to the large scale change in the way we feel and interact with the Internet. Yeah, there could be something to that.

I mean, I definitely think. For example, I do a lot of research obviously, and so you know before I'd say from twenty from twenty sixteen to now, Google as a search engine basically doesn't work because I would say at least sixty to seventy percent of what you could pull up back then you can't even find it anymore. It's pretty wild. Do you remember AOL's AOL and CDs? Absolutely? Man, did y'all watch my livestream? I did on like the nineties.

That was a fun livestream. So bands are disappearing? And how has that internet theory perhaps affected the music genre? Well? What about AI? Like how many tracks are AI tracks? For example? As you guys remember when I sang my wonderful, beautiful cringe core hit, the Matt Dillahunty song Matt Dila Monkey Scooter produced this AI version in like no time that was way more catchy than my original Matt Dila Monkey song, and it sounded like a literal black choir

and something. Well, wait a minute, if the public AI program can do this, maybe they've been doing AI music for freaking who knows how long. And don't think that the record companies wouldn't scam you by basically just like imagine if you're I don't know, Miley Cyrus and the record company says, we click the button a few times and like the AI spit out twenty new Amiley Cyrus songs. You gotta think that's happening, right, Let's see check this out. So this is AI. What's the program called Suno or

something like that. I mean, this sounds like a black choir from the seventies or earth Wind and Fire or something producing some kind of big R and B soulful ballad. It doesn't sound I mean, it kind of sounds AI. But I'm sure that if you're a zillionaire, you have access to a better AI than this.

Mendela effect. I think it's Mendel effect is stupid. But what if they're trying to My theory is, what if they're trying to like erase aspects of culture, maybe as an experiment, or maybe they're actually trying to do it. I mean, we all saw what the search engines a few weeks ago, a few months ago, remember that when all of the people in history were suddenly brothers and sisters. Now no offense to my brothers and sisters, but listen, y'all,

are not all of the people in history? Okay? And remember this Google and other this sort of scandal while back, and then they said, oh, this is a mistake. But so basically AI spat out African and Black versions of every person in history by mistake. So I'm thinking, okay, well so wait a minute. So there we see a window into what could be an example or a means

by which you could try to erase history. And if you think about Maoism, remember they tried to do this with the Culture Revolution that Mao ran and Mao like energized and used the youth to try to erase history. Yeah, exactly, it was intentional. Yeah, So if mal was an example of that erasing of history and rewriting it, all of these crazy cult people in this woke you know, CRT d I, S DG cult like they're going to do the same stuff, right that They're willing to do whatever

to erase history. So now you know, so what if they're experimenting with erasing things to see if they can maybe get away with it, erasing certain things like could that be elements of what people think is Mandela effect? I think most Mandela effect nonsense is just people misremembering events. Kirk Cobain was black. I always thought. I mean, I knew that a long time ago.

So I'm looking on here and I was thinking about, say, old Oasis CDs that I had, and I'm almost certain that I had a two disc live track familiar to millions that had a song on it. And when you go and look, now, I could be misremembering. This could

be a actual case of misremembering something. But when you look on the online versions of albums, and this isn't just a case, and this is random Oasis example that I've noticed a lot of different online Apple versions of these downloads, I don't think these are all the same. I heard a song the other day and I'm like, that's not the song from the nineties. That's some weird version, but it was presented as if that was the normative version of that song. I forget which example this was.

This is a different example, and I wonder how many cases of things being changed like this.

jumping a dryer and get stuck in there. But what they changed it to is like an look like an oven, or like a that's even worse, right, or like something to do with like do Why are you in here asking about my personal life? Yes, I'm married, and you're not here to promote other people's discourse. Get out of here anyway? Who's cooking me in the chat? What are you talking about?

cooking in the chat? Michael Heiser was a subscriber to my website before he passed away, so people always ask about Michael Heiser. But no, I'm not going to Speaker's corner. They've already I know, they've already been changing stuff. That's what I'm talking about. Oh, they banned episodes of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia. Interesting. They changed the ending of the Six Star Wars to include Anakin. Interesting. They added a disclaimer to Rush Hour. Wow. Well, the disclaimers is

just the first stage before the banning. You see that? I mean, did you notice that when Oasis said they were getting back together, they were already the woke was already going after Oasis over Noel playing with a guitar that has the British flag. That's crazy. And Noel made a joke about how stupid modern books work with all their gay titles. So they like, this is getting crazy, man, this is wild. They memory hold all the liberal comedians doing ooh interesting. Yeah, so if you do that kind

of make up routine, the memory hold it. Yeah, did you know there is a memory hold Don Henley song funny thing. Alex will actually play this song every now and then.

I could not find this on YouTube. Okay, right, Interesting, So I looked for the song a year ago and you couldn't find it. It's interesting that it got put up here one year ago. Oh wait a minute, when was this song written? Two thousand?

by the well connected. Your little protest was summarily rejected. It wasn't inside job like it always is. Chalk it up to business as usual. While we were dreaming, this little island disappeared. They took away the right to your own ideas. It wasn't inside job. Favors collected, your trusted servants, your politicians left you unpredicted. It was an inside job. You think you're smart business as usual. You don't have an f and clue. But those men up in the towers,

what they're doing to me and you? This is written in two thousand. Wow. Anyway, this was not on YouTube for a long time. You could only find on bitch. I'm surprised they put it back on you too. By the way, I'm not saying that makes Don Henley some kind of hero. I don't. I don't have any. I mean the Eagles are listed as like a Laurel Canyon type of band, and most of these boomer rock and roll and people are like the worst, dude, They're like total garbage people. I'm not saying Don Henley is I

don't know. I haven't followed Don Henley. I don't keep up with the boomer bands. But like if you go on Twitter and you look up like Pink Floyd members profiles, it's all the latest like whatever, like Ukraine flag transflag, like that's that's all they do is put up the worst shit imaginable.

sure why. It probably goes back to the fact that the Orthodox canon is what Trollo accepts from the African Synods, and the Roman Catholic Canon is from the Roman Council of Pope Damasis and what Augustine listed. So that's probably the origin of the disagreement. But why the Catholics didn't include it, I don't actually know. Zelmax is five dollars. One more question. Do you have any recommended reading to

get up to day on the history of Islam. I mean, there's a lot you could read about Islam, there's not really any I don't know of an easy book to start reading. I would say, start watching Sam's debates, Sam's channel on all the islam stuff. Go watch the Doctor khalil uh talk that I shared. The Doctor Khalil talk

has him beginning to go through the schools. So the first thing you're going gonna want to learn about Islam is the first early few centuries, the disputes between the Mutazila, the Muta Kalaimam, the what's called the Authori or the Salafi. Those are the early Area Area era disputes. You're gonna want to listen to doctor Khalil's talk to understand the basic schools. So you want to understand the difference between the Authari, the Maturidi, the Shari, and then the Shia,

who are the neoplatonic faction of Iran. So so the first three school those are schools within Sunni Islam. Shea are very different. They descend from a different line of Islam. So you're gonna want to learn all that stuff. So anyway, there's not an easy I don't know about A. I'm sure there is something comparable to Philip Schaft's history of the church, but I don't know what that would be. Go ask doctor Khalil. He would know better than me,

since you're Hippi or three dollars or Sam Shuman. Even a couple of years ago, there was a writer strike in Hollywood. Yeah, remember that were I was we were gonna do a trying to do that first live stream with Jimmy Kennedy around that time. One of the concerns with the writers was that AI was going to regurgitate stuff. Oh exactly, yeah, exactly. This makes you wonder if modern movies aren't actually using AI and Marvel the Universe or

whatever to script mass produced movies. Oh, I bet they are. I bet they are. Yeah exactly. I forgot about that writer's strike over AI. That's a great point. AUGUSTA ten dollars small token appreciation. I've learned everything For everything, I've learned about my faith here from this channel. Thank you, God, bless you and Jamie happy piece of exaltation.

like twenty years ago. They were calling the future Internet will be called Internet two and the present Internet will be scrapped. It won't exist anymore. But like you said, it'd be like some weird archives somewhere that you know, only the global elite had access to. I think that's so. Yeah, that's something to that, and I totally forgot about this section in Blade Runner twenty forty nine. That's fascinating. I have to go back and watch that. Since Irrea gret

three dollars. There's an actress named Deborah Wilson whose likeness was scanned into many modern video games. Well, this was in the movie The Congress by with Robin Wright. So we actually did some it's almost ten years ago that we were doing podcasts. I think we did a boiler room. We did a boiler room where we talked about The Congress by Robin Wright. And if you've never seen this movie, everybody should go watch this because it was an overlooked

dystopian film that pretty much predictable wreck. Yeah, so we're exactly ten years ago and I was doing you know what, I got to put this in the next the new estaty Hollywood. This has got to go in there because this was a really important, predictive film. So basically, i'll tell you the premise. I won't spoil it for you, but the actress Robin Wright from The Princess Bride, she goes to Harvey Kayitel, who's like a studio guy or whatever, and she says, as the actress, you know, I'm gonna

have to retire. I can't really do movies. I've got a son who's got, you know, to be tended to. He's got medical issues. And Harvey kytell says, well, let the studio buy your image and likeness. And she's like, what do you mean, how could that be? He says, well, we've got this new technology where we will scan your whole body, like all of the angles of your body, and you're all of your facial expressions, the whole range of emotions. Here's this big thing. She goes and stands

in r here. So this is all cameras, right, and so they're they're creating this digital deep fake version of her. Okay, and the movie, as he says, this is the near future, right, they changed her future. So here she is being scanned in. She doesn't really understand what this is all about, but she needed the money and she wasn't going to be acting anymore. So the studio was telling her and everyone that they would be doing this, and it flashes forward

to here's metaverse. Now they don't call it this, but so basically it's some undefined near future everyone lives in the We'll call it the metaverse. The virch whatever virtual world. So the Internet becomes this, it becomes this like three dimensional space where you like walk around as whatever avatar you want to be. So here's Robin Wright interacting with the Tom Cruise avatar in the year twenty thirty or something, right, And then the movie gets really crazy because it you

got to see this part. Let's skip past it. It's very surreal. So basically in the real time period of the future, people are all walking around with the goggles on their face. Let's see, there's a picture of it. So everyone is basically living in the slums. It's like total you know, filthy dirt, poor everybody, right, And I don't know why this image doesn't have them where in the goggles. But in another scene, everyone's wearing the goggles to be on the Internet all the time. So there's

basically a giant dystopian world. But everyone lives in internet dystopia world dressed like, you know, wearing you know, tattered rags basically. So I won't spoil the movie where it goes, but it actually goes way into the future, like it goes really wild. It's a crazy movie, but everyone should see it. It's a very predictive, relevant, relevant film for where we have gone. And again, we were doing boiler rooms on this ten years ago when it came out.

I wonder if I could find that I should have put this in the first Turk cabb what I forgot to do it? Though, Let's see if it comes up. No, man, those old boiler rooms from like twenty fifteen. Man, they're like, that's like the future. Man. We were like spot on. Not everything. We probably we probably got maybe fifteen percent of stuff wrong, but I'd say eighty to eighty five percent of stuff. We were pretty spot on as to

where we would be going in the future. I mean, we talked about stabbyes, we talked about the normalization of where we're at with human sexuality. We talked about tracking and Tracy, and we talked about I mean a lot of stuff. We were spot on AI and deep fake where that was gonna go anyway, My boy, let's see since their hypocrite, said Deborah Wilson's likeness has scanned into many video games. I'm not sure who that is, but it could always be a possibility that in the future

they won't even need actors. Well, that's what the movie. The Congress is about exactly. Schmevin Schmirk one hundred dollars, Thank you so much. You can keep this money if you promise not to read any more Latin documents on this stream. Hey, uh, you know what, nobody would rather retire from reading boring Latin trad documents on screen than me because we've been doing this for so many years now, We've had so many hours of so many podcasts of

going through Denzinger and all this boring stuff. I should have just skipped it. But for the first hour that's all anybody wanted. The whole chat was just talking about that. So I'm auxus five dollars, thank you for that one hundred dollars, SEP, which I appreciate that five dollars. How do you stay in good shape and mentally aware throughout the day? Chut dot com? What do you mean like we have an amazing sponsorhip.

Sigmas only. It is guaranteed to empower you to dominate your co workers, fire your boss, aggressively, gamble, or invade a small village. Chad Mode stands out from the crowd by excluding artificial flavors, preservatives, sweeteners, and dyes. We've even avoided so called natural flavors which are actually not natural at all, ensuring a clean and effective formula. Experience the pure goodness of chad Mode colored with organic blue spirolina extract,

organic lemon cherry, and organic maple crystals. Forget synthetic caffeine made in a sketchy Chinese lab. Embrace the natural power of organic green coffee bean extract, which will get your mind fine going and pump you up to the max. Chad Mode is made in America with all clean ingredients, the first clean pre workout of its kind. Why are these people adding synthetic sweeteners to every single pre workout when there are many studied downsides to consuming nasty fake sucralose.

Each dose of chad Mode contains the kick of a cup and a half of coffee, delivering a surge of energy alongside essential vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and herbal extracts. Chad Mode will allow you to fire your boss and dominate anyone who opposes you. Chad Mode will make you more dominant in your daily life, so proceed with caution.

It's as simple as mixing one or two scoops of our fine powder into water or juice, providing you with a delicious, energizing beverage featuring a burst of sweet organic fruit flavor. Chad Mode will give you the extra edge you desperately crave. Don't miss out. Secure your supply of chad Mode on TikTok shop with a limited time, massive disc Elevate your workouts and supercharge your days. Chad Mode not for your average jimbrozoomer who consumes synthetic blue dyes

on the daily. Buy on the TikTok shop now with a massive discount provided by TikTok for a very limited time. Buy now while this is still available, or go to Chuck dot com and use code in caption. Chad Mode has been flying off the shelves because it's the first of its kind, certified for Alpha males only.

It is guaranteed to empower you to dominate your co workers, fire your boss, aggressively, gam both, or invade a small village. Chad mode stands out from the crowd by excluding artificial flavors, preservatives, sweeteners, and dies. We've even avoided so called natural flavors which are actually not natural at all, ensuring a clean and effective formula experience.

don't have to buy that whole stack. You could buy individually the Action Tip Point or the talk Out only, the Talkout one hundred or any of these other products over here. Focused on performance, focused on energy, focused on getting your health right by decoilifying yourself and becoming more and more toxically masculine. So big advocate for Chalk. They are our sponsor, have been for three years maybe maybe even moving on to almost three years. About three years

so maybe maybe four. So shout out to Chalk. And then what else do we do?

the those things. We also do pretty extensive walks. I'm not a big runner. If I am in the in the in the mode of playing basketball, I'll run playing basketball, but I don't like go out and run typically. But Jimy and I do also do pretty long walks on the regular. So my main health things are gem really I'm talking about like two three mile walks on the regular and uh, you know, pretty strict diet, no seed oils. I don't eat candy. I don't need a lot of carbs.

I don't need sugars, very little of those. Unless my beatus is attacking and I'm getting angry at people, then I got to have a little bit of a ginger chew to calm down. So those are my My health regiment is very simple, it's not too extensive. I do take supplements, I do take chalk that kind of stuff. So that's my means. How do I say, mentally aware. I drink a lot of coffee espresso. I also we've been taking na I D's which have been pretty effective.

I think they work pretty good. We tried two different brands. Both brands seem to work pretty good. I forget what the names of those brands were. I don't know if Chalk has those, I don't think. I think they're mainly focused on bodily related stuff. But remember at Chalk they also have female vitality stack too, so you can get that and you don't have to buy the whole stack. You can buy individual products too, So Shila is great, Oshogonda is great, Irish moss for balancing out hormone levels

and ladies this kind of stuff. Guys, if you're going to the gym, you want to get you need that energy. There's all kinds of different stacks over there for men, Male Vitality Stack, et cetera, performance stack, all available at Chalk dot com, depending upon what is the best fit for you. I'm a big fan of the is it inn i ad I forget how it's how it's listed. Sheila Jit's great. Yeah, so heading over to Chalk and utilize that.

cringe Core. So if you want to see cringe Core live, and I'm sure I'll be hanging out doing interviews with people stuff too. October twenty five and twenty six. We'll have our books. Yes, you can buy books there, So get your tickets to Brohemian Grove over here at toplots do dot com and the link is right there. So we didn't really get into papal geopolitics or whatever. That's okay, I can change the title. We did end up talking about, well we kind of did. We didn't really talk about

the end Times. I might change this title because we didn't really talk about the End Times. One World, Weird Order, that's a better title. That's more of what we talked about. We talked about pop culture, weird things in culture. I don't know. This is a fun stream. Oh we talked a lot about those deconstructing my faith videos or whatever. I forgot about that I've been. Who am I rated by? Would even have been rated? I don't understand what's happening.

All right, Thank you guys, a lot of fun today. Appreciate the super chatters. Be sure and get the signed copies of the But we didn't really go through all the books, and I had a lot of books I was going to talk about, you know, classic famous books that we've been, that we've read.