The planet's tough.
The masters almost surely have a plan.
This clearly made me.
Something there beyond the realm of men.
And until you Flody tested, every last school's tested you a fine.
The more you think you know, the less you really do.
That's true, doctor, Say, where would.
We be without tec because we know that audienciers just don't.
Know what to creed?
Yet, where would we be without dec the Highest Side chat Show, Red Car Company?
All right, Higher Side Chatters?
We know that from the printing press of the film. Real mediums of mass communication have always been weaponized and used as the main vehicles for propaganda and culture creation. And, along with the school system dead set on churning out obedient servants to the management, last movies and media act is the pacifiers that make many people just content enough
with their life of servitude. Well, today's returning guest, Jay Dyer, has been picking apart the Titans of Tinseltown for many years on his website Jay's Analysis, where he methodically breaks down dozens of films to expose the hidden agendas and symbolism they contain. He also writes extensively on philosophy, geopolitics, history, conspiracy, esoterica and more, and we got him here hot on the heels of his great new book Esoteric Hollywood, Sex,
Cults and Symbols and Film. It's a real treat to have him here once again, Jay Moman, welcome back to the Higher Side.
Thank you, Greg. Always a pleasure. I'm glad to be back.
We had a really good time last time talking about science fiction and propaganda, and I'm sure this.
Will be equally as exciting.
Yeah, man, I really loved that last episode.
I think we also focused a lot on Ian Fleming and the Bond films. Interstellar was pretty fresh at that time too, exactly.
And I also really enjoyed this new book of yours.
And maybe a good place to start with that is that one of the first sections is called film as Ritual, which is provocative. But how closely related do you think film and ritual really are? How are they similar?
Well, the idea of ritual could be many things, right, I mean, we generally think of it as a kind of religious ceremony that has some connection to deities or the divine or the celestial, And in modern parlance, I guess we've kind of disconnected the idea of theater and plays and acting from that milieu. But that's actually where it comes from. You know, if you go back to ancient Greece, the idea of Sophocles, of antigony of the theater was bound up with the idea of the gods
and the stories of the gods. And you know, it's the same with Homer, Odysseus.
The Iliad, all of that.
And so what I tried to do was kind of go back to that ancient perspective and get a window into that. And I did a lecture I think about a year ago or maybe two years ago on Plato's Ion, which is a dialogue that not many people are aware of.
Io In is the name of the dialogue.
And it's a conversation that Socrates has with some poets and musicians and they're saying, hey, Socrates.
Like, you don't know what truth is, man.
You think it's all this philosophizing and analytical stuff and it's inspiration, that's the true truth. And Socrates says, no, you guys are actually just kind of Dionysian madmen. He says, you're He says, you're inspired by these spirits and conceivably, you know, there is evidence to suggested in ancient Greece they actually were perhaps taking callucinogens and narcotics and things like this. So it's entirely possible that the in the arts and musicians and so forth poets were under the
influence of drugs and so forth. So in that regard, Plato and Socrates basically say that it's alternate spirits, alternate gods, alternate other personalities or entities quote unquote that are kind
of inspiring this performance or this play or whatever. And when we fast forward to probably the most popular modern school or technique of serious acting that you know, most of the A listers are into, you get to the Stanislovsky method, which is the method acting of Constantine Stanislavski, who's like a Russian dude from about one hundred years ago, and his whole idea was that you could, through his craft, through his methodology, invoke and sort of take on these
other personalities. So that's the perspective that I'm kind of coming from and looking at. And what's interesting is that you know, whether you believe that there are actual alternate personalities or spirits or things that people take on or invoke, or entities that might invade someone's psyche or conscious mind
or something like that. Whether you believe in that or not, people do believe in that, and so they will operate on that belief system, and perhaps under the influence of drugs or rituals or ceremonies or magic or whatever that they're into, they may actually sort of go into this sort of furor this kind of berserk sort of state, which is what Plato was talking about.
So that's what I start with.
That's why I start as film as ritual, because acting in the ancient world was ritual.
Yeah, man, I love it that idea that theater and the practice of acting out those mythological stories is like an attempt to draw down the power of those entities. Yeah, it's it's deep stuff, and it's like pretty out there I think for a lot of people. But I mean it makes sense. And do you think that there is a bit of that drawing down of the spirits going on in modern filmmaking as well?
Well?
Many of the A listers are openly into method acting. So again, I'm not saying that I can prove that they actually do it, or that they're possessed or anything like that, But what I'm saying is that they believe and act upon the philosophy of Constantine Stanislowski, which was occulting in nature, and so he really thought that you could have an alternate persona step in and take over your persona.
So that's the goal.
Now, whether they actually do that as I'm sure debatable, but I mean, how many times have we seen people, for example, if they have a bad trip, right, and the story is that, you know an Apocalypse Now, who is a Martin Sheen right? I mean he's supposed to be really tripping when he goes crazy in that scene, famous scene in Apocalypse Now, So again this is method acting.
Yeah, it's crazy.
I mean we've talked on the show about the idea of alternate personalities. I mean, this happens a lot in Hollywood and music. I mean, so many actors don't even use their real name, which is kind of strange. I
mean there's no other field like that. And then even within that, you'll have a lot of musicians in particular who have alternate personalities, which seems like a weird thing to do when you're trying to build a specific brand and you've done all this work to build up Beyonce and now you're Sasha Fierce or you've built up Garth Brooks and now you're whatever his alternate persona.
Was that he used.
Very weird that they do that at all, And it kind of connects to this idea of being more of a vessel for various personalities or taking on various personas.
So I think you're onto something.
Well, a lot of people think that that's not real, and I will fully admit that in the case of oh pop stars and things like that, that it's entirely possible that a lot of it's just marketing. Right, So maybe when there's going to be a new Beyonce album or you know, David Bowie or whoever, they're going to take on a new marketing persona of Zegge, Star Dust or Sasha Fears or whatever. So it's entirely possible that that is marketing. But I also have read a lot
of books from psychiatrists and sociologists and psychologists. For example, there's a one that's pretty popular called Switching Time, and this is leave a psychiatrists several years counseling a woman with multiple personalities. Now, that could be fake. I've heard some good argumentation suggesting that the classic story Sybil was fake, but then again the source calling it fake was NPR, so well, MPR is not the most reliable source. So the idea of splits and altered and all this is
very I guess, controversial and debated. And when you look at the reason why a lot of people dismiss it, the basis is if it's things like, oh, it's not possible because it doesn't fit with the idea of materialistic reductionistic Darwinism or something like this, like you know, the brain is just matter, and since we're not seeing anything actually splitting under the microscope or something like this, then
it's not possible. Well, that just is assuming that the mind of the psyche or the soul is in itself material, which is an unproven assumption, again based on a person's belief in materialism. However, if the soul and the psyche exist, then that opens up all kinds of uh and it's not strictly material quote unquote, then that opens up, you know, all kinds of possibilities for what may actually be going on.
And I tend to believe that we don't fully know and understand the things of the soul and the psych I mean, the Bible even says this in Paul's letters. Paul says, you know, man doesn't even comprehend his own spirit, so how is he going to make these sort of definitive, so cult scientistic claims about what's possible in the realm of the psyche? So anyway, yeah, I would say that. And I remember, like, even in college, the first time
I encountered this idea. One of my first college classes was a psychology class, and we watched some videos on people with multiple personality disorder or d ID, and I think it's.
To all appearances, it appears to be real.
I don't see how all of these people could be all faking this, So I tend to think it's real. Now how developed that is in terms of can they literally call forth all these.
Different persons through trigger words and keywords?
You know, this is actually the plot of this new Shamelain movie, which I thought was.
Actually really good. Yeah Split Split and Yeah. I went and saw that. I thought it was great. I enjoyed it. I tend to think that. I mean, obviously that's a little bit.
Hollywooded up, but if you read a book like Switching Time, you know, it seems to line up pretty clear.
What's that?
And I would say that that would be my suspicion as to what really goes on.
But do I know if Britney has multiple personalities?
She acts pretty loony sometimes and as she looks like there's these different personas. So I wouldn't be surprised in her case because I have seen some interviews where she does seem to act very goofy and change her.
Personality totally right.
I've seen people have freak outs on drugs where it's not just then freaking out, like it appears to me that somebody else was running that machine. The ghost in the machine was switched out, there was some other ghosts in there.
Yeah, I mean, I definitely think there's something to this for sure. Again, I agree with you like it's about determining to what degree, but yeah, there's something to it for sure.
And I'm curious do you see.
Film being good vehicles for occult aims outside of invocation? Are there other things in that occult esoteric toolbox that are being manifested through film?
Are there good aspects? Sure? Sure?
I don't think you know all the films are nefarious or propaganda. You know, several chapters in my book are kind of lighthearted and goofy and satirical, so that they're not really to be taken, you know, too seriously. I think the Logan's Run and the Zardag chapters are pretty I mean, there's some deep dark stuff in those films, but for the most part, they're just kind of fun and satirical sci fi versions of like Plato's Allegory the Cave.
And I don't think those are necessarily, you know, nefarious fair points.
But to clarify, and i'd i'd say good vehicles, but I don't mean good in a moral sense. But I'm more curious if you see films acting as useful mechanisms for other occult aims besides the invocation aspects we talked
about other things in the Magical Toolbox. For example, I sometimes hear people suggest that a major aim of mass media and Hollywood is to replace our imagination or to have us outsource our ability to visualize, because they know how important the connection between consciousness and matter is and that we can influence our reality. But not if they bombard us with all this filler from a young age.
So I guess I'm really asking if you see other occult related purposes for the Hollywood machine other than the entity energy draw down aspect that you would laid out already.
Okay, I see what you're saying. I have seen.
My buddy John brought this to my attention. John Adams over at Hoostbusters. He said, if you look at the book, I forget the title of it off the top of my head, but I did look it up. Gregory Bateson, who is one of the sort of MK ultra guys in the background, he wrote a book where he did actually talk about capturing man's imagination, and he saw that the need to control creativity and imagination was very important for social engineering because in my view, this is really
the function of Disney, right. It's like it is all about quote imagination, and what they've done with Disney is totally weaponized it to capture your children's imagination and really turn it into a lot of dark social engineering things like you know, they want to take your kid and take her from being Hannah Montana and turn her into gender fluid, disgusting slutty Miley Cyrus. So that's the real goal of capturing imagination.
Mm hmm, yeah, man, Disney is quite a force, and I really do enjoy people break down Disney films. Sometimes it goes too far, I will admit. And I actually checked out some of the songs on YouTube from that new one Mona and I guess the Rock plays a demigod character. I assume from Hawaiian mythology. I think that's what it's all about. And there is a line in one of his songs where he describes making the world and at one point he says, I killed an eel,
buried its guts sprout of a tree. Now you have coconuts. And I just thought, huh, that's a fairly detailed ritual description, right there, a bit of an evolution from when you wish upon a pentagram. And I am being facetious, but I've heard some researchers make a really compelling case that, however small, there is a very purposeful occult thread through a lot of those films.
It's an interesting point. I haven't followed much Disney stuff or kids stuff in general. I tend to focus on more well, at least in the first book you know that I did. It was mainly things that I grew up with, you know, Spielberg movies, Hitchcock movies, James Bond Kubrick, things that I watched growing up in high school and stuff like that. But I'm sure that, yeah, you could definitely go a whole other rabbit hole, you know, into kids films and all.
The programming and stuff like that.
And but again, I think that the main tool of what they do with the kids films is promote mindless sort of rebellion, promote wells. As you mentioned, they're sort of the capturing of the imagination and turning it to really just the service of the system. I mean, you know, Disney, for example, was for a long time involved in promoting government propaganda and military recruitment.
That was a big part of what Disney himself stood for.
He had access to and worked at the Laurel Canyon Studios, you know, where they did all these secret Air Force films and so forth that I discussed in the book that comes from Dave McGowan's work. So, yeah, that is a good question. I mean, only the kids aspect of something that could be explored more. But I mean I've seen all kinds of dastardly stuff from Nickelodeon and MTV, and you know that I think is genuinely intended to have negative effects on your children.
I mean, the whole goal of all of it is a depopulation.
Yeah, I mean it could be a stretch, but I've even heard people talking about the sliming of kids on Nickelodeon being you know, symbolic of semen.
I mean, that might.
Be a stretch, but I'm like, that is kind of kind of creepy too when you think about it in that context.
But let's get into Spielberg a little bit.
You write about them a decent amount in esoteric Hollywood, breaking down several of his movies, and if there were a larger, semi organized machine behind Hollywood, Spielberg would have to be involved. So when you look at the totality of his films, do you see an over arching aim or agenda that becomes more clear?
Yeah, I think you could boil down like probably three major themes that Spielberg deals with. He deals with holocaust, he deals with familial relations, and he deals with aliens. That's the three things that he's focused on. So what I folks, well, alien slash transhumanism and so forth. So what I focused on in my book was the alien and transhuman myths and stories that he's focused on and so he interestingly does have a penchant for Philip K. Dick, who I think is very fascinating as a writer and
a character. Because you know, Spielberg did Minority Report, so there's a chapter on Minority Report that I do that focuses on dystopia and how tech can lead to dystopia. So not everything in Spielberg is bad. I don't think he's totally nefarious or anything like that. And I don't actually go after anybody personally or any of the directors. I just kind of try to decode the films and see what patterns and meanings I can find in the symbolism.
What is Spielberg all about?
Was I said, aliens and transhumanism, And I think those two things are linked. For one, because I personally am not convinced that there's like extra biological entities. But I think that if you watch movies like ET and then you watch something like his version of or the Worlds, the cold calculated scientistic approach that the so called aliens have sure does seem to match up to the cold calculated scientistic approach of the deep state and the military
industrial complex and the international corporations. Yeah, they have that because like, so at the end of Closed Encounters, what's it all about. Well, they're stealing, abducting kids and family members, and you get the impression at the very very end that they're doing some kind of genetic modification on these people and then they're like giving them back to you like twenty years later or something, and they haven't aged.
So the idea is, oh, the alien no overlords are working on genetic modification, hybridization, GMOs, halting, the aging process, you know, all these kinds of things that we in the conspiracy world really believe the oligarchs are working on and are into. So I think that's the real meaning of something like Close Encounters, which actually kicked off the
modern alien Hollywood blockbuster phenomena. I can't really think. I mean, there was there probably were alien movies, no doubt, many of them prior to Close Encounters, but making aliens into a giant blockbusters, you know, it begins, I would say with if you don't count two thousand and one, which I tend to believe two thousand and ones about AI not so called aliens but extra terrestrial beings, you get, you know, you get Close Encounters, which is based on
Jail and Heinek and Jacqueville, Right, this is both of their works. We're kind of the basis for what was going on in Close Encounters. And actually I believe Heinek. I found sources saying that Jalen Heineck was actually consulting with Spielberg on the set. So yeah, so I think that you're talking about people from the deep state who know about what the UFO and on really is sort of consulting with Bilberg. Spielberg's putting out his version of it.
And you know, then when you look at Et, I think Et is actually about this idea of the Et.
Is more like a familiar spirit than he is like an alien. That's why he has this.
Very strange bonded connection with Elliott. And you know when Et gets drunk and burbs, Elliot's drunk and belching. Right, Yeah, this is very very weird stuff going on there.
But yeah, man, and this is exactly what I wanted to get into because I love that ET analysis and it's it's so interesting you talk about in the film Meet You mentioned the shadow government researcher in the movie is named Keys, and that it's a reference to the Key of Solomon. And let's get into this bit. What is the significance there is that message part of the uh subtly saying that Et is a familiar spirit or a demon rather than a space alien.
I would say so because you look at what his so called powers are, and they again, they match up much closer to something like a familiar spirit supposedly than it does any sort of quote alien. It's almost as if Elliott invokes Et to come and they have this. It's almost like Et is his higher self or his
you know, sort of holy guardian angel or something. And I think there's a lot of bizarre, sort of Crollian dish imagery in the film too, with you know, the moon child and Elliott flying across the moon as a child, this stuff.
I think that's suggestive. It's not definitive, but it's suggestive.
And so the Peter Coyote character, that's the guy who's playing keys. He shows up at the beginning and then he pops up later at the end, and he's actually this sort of mysterious almost angelic government figure. He's turns out to be a good guy because he's opening up all of these scenarios at least That's how I read it, And actually I think Roger Ebert says something similar to that in his book The Great Movies when he looks
at ET. So anyway, it's a it's a different take on ET definitely that I have.
But the actual guy, Peter.
Coyote, interestingly, was a hardcore Marxist and he was a big time sort of activist quote unquote and in terms of Marxism and cultural revolution.
So you know, I think that's potentially suggest I'm.
Not saying he is an occultist or anything like that, for sure, but it's just interesting that, you know, you don't see this guy in a lot of movies, and Spielbert chooses him for this role. I don't know why, but ultimately I think what ET is was the propagation of a rebranding of the alien mythology for a generation
of youth. Right, so I was Elliott's age when ET came out, so that was targeted at people my generation, and I think the goal of that was a rebranding of quote, aliens, not to be something nefarious or dangerous and some otherworldly threat, but something that we should embrace. And when you get to my Prometheus chapter, what I argue is that the reason that we're being warmed up to quote aliens for so long, and why Hollywood just constantly turns out alien movies like NonStop, is not just
for blockbuster ticket sales. It's actually, I think, to sort of warm us up for the acceptance of a new global religion that melds better with Darwinism. And I think that, as I argue in the HD Wells Spielberg chapter in the book, I believe that we've been prepped for this for a long time, going all the way back to the science fiction and predictive programming of H. G.
Wells. And that's why Spielberg chooses things like war the.
World's Fascinating Man. And I love that Et example. I remember when I was a kid. You even note the fact that Et glows as maybe an element of him being more of a familiar. And I remember when I was young, I was like, why does this thing glow?
It just doesn't look right.
Thought it was awkward, But it makes the point that maybe it isn't. Maybe it's a spiritual entity rather than something from space.
Yeah, And I think that the planetary connections that we see in the film also suggest planetary deities, right, and this is kind of how the Key of Solomon and our ancient mythology would have viewed et and the gods quote unquote.
I also like the thing that you point out that the government agents arrive in NASA's space suits in the movie, and that is so weird. Why would you be in a space suit anywhere but space? But it is, it's in there.
Yeah, I've always thought that was odd. And so how do we read this, how do we make sense of this? Well, once we have a broader perspective of things like Kubrick and we realized that Kubrick was working with NASA, which I touch on in the book, and you know, if we've seen the work from say Jay Wiedener on Kubrick and the moon landings and that theory, I think that especially given the fact that Spielberg took over Kubrick's script ai, you know, and changed it to aliens and stuff like this,
which I don't think Kubrick was had in the original story, there's some nods and crossovers between Spielberg to Kubrick, and I've always just wondered if that wasn't some kind of nod or or hint that the moon landings and Apollo and all this kind of stuff is not what we are told.
When we look at other nods.
And instances in films that I touch on in the book, like Diamonds Are Forever. Well, there's a scene where, you know, James Bond runs onto a movie set where they're filming the Moonlighting.
Yeah, I love it, man. And you also even note the similarities and titles between ET and that Kubrick Spielberg collaboration of AI, and you say that it could be a mystigogical code for the origins of advanced artificial technology as channeled from inter dimensional alien gods. Great sentence, and I love that idea. I've been hearing it more and more that technology comes from connections to entities like Prometheus
bringing as fire. Is that your impression of where a lot of technology comes from some type of occult workings.
I do think that that's possible, and that's I believe that, not just because of you know, some kind of weird thesis or something I dreamed up, but actually, when you go into the history of philosophers or sort of pioneers of modern technology, you can look at characters like Descartes. You can look at somebody like John d was of course interested in alchemy and things like that too, BUTNZ GW. Leibniz, the famous continental philosopher who's the co founder of calculus
with Newton. Leibniz was very interested in alchemy and the esoteric and metaphysics and things like this, and Platonism, and he is one of the formative figures kind of dreaming up the possibility of a computer or a logic machine. So there's always been in you know, Jewish mysticism, the idea of the golumn, which is the creation of a robot being or a synthetic human.
And so.
I think we have nascent in the mythology a lot of the hints and primeval. I mean, you could almost argue that's kind of predictive programming, like ancient mythology, right, is almost a kind of primeval predictive programming for what is possible with technology and alchemy. So I know that's kind of that might be debatable, and people might howl at that and think that I'm crazy, But I mean, yeah,
maybe it was just his own clever insight. But how was Leibniz streaming up the possibility of a computer you know, back in the fifteen hundreds, how did you know Da Vinci was like sketching out helicopters and stuff.
I mean, right, where do our ideas come from? We don't really know.
We don't know. That's what I'm trying to say.
And that's what I was getting at earlier about you know, the psyche and splitting of the psyche and all that, is that I hold that out as a very likely thesis, much more likely than the Darwinian reductionist thesis, because you know, we don't even know what the source of our stream
of consciousness thought processes. So how are we going to make these sort of definitive claims about, Oh, it's absolutely impossible that there's a spiritual unalm or you know, that we could receive the impressions of ideas or creativity from those kinds of sources.
Right, I mean, the idea of the muse goes back as far as artists.
Yeah.
So it's interesting, man. And to talk about AI a little bit more. It came out in two thousand and one, probably for specific reasons, but do you see its messages and themes becoming any more poignant in the decade plus since the film was made.
Absolutely.
Yeah, that's kind of why I chose that one just to be in the books, and there was.
Probably ninety two one hundred film analysis.
I had to leave out that maybe they'll make up you know, part two or three or something, But that one I.
Chose because it fit with the theme.
That I was looking at from Spielberg, you know, transhumanism and synthetic future and all this kind of stuff, synthetic dystopia basically, And so I argue that AI is a kind of transhumanist fairy tale, that what he's done is taking the Pinocchio myth and reformulated it for modernity.
And again this was taken from Kuberg.
This was actually a Kuberg screenplay that Spielberg took over an altered and of course added in aliens. Anything with Spielberg's gonna have aliens in there. But it functions, I believe, on multiple levels. So it's not just about the possibilities of AI. It's also in a nefarious sense. If you notice the David character, the AI character, he's always he's portrayed as this sort of Edenic innocent I mean, he is the future of quote humanity, but he's humanity two
point zero. We make him in our image right as kind of new gods or new creators. And I'm sure everybody's seen the film, so you're aware of the fact
that humanity dies out right. And the film begins with this sort of eugenics Green Agenda twenty one type message of the earth has been flooded from global polarizes, caps melting or something nonsense like this, and you know, there's only these these kind of sparse human communities, and the bots are persecuted, and so Spielberg has the bots put into a lot of these Holocaust type scenarios and narratives where they're being trucked off in carts and you know,
they're taken to the flesh fare, which is this Dante's Inferno style torture scenario. And so what I'm getting at here is that they're treated as the new.
Civil rights victims.
Now, twenty thirty years ago, nobody would have believed possible. Everybody would have laughed if you had said, we are entering the phase in the near future where bots and cyborgs and transhumanism and people who get you know, body mod and all this kind of stuff that's actually going to be a new civil rights slash human rights or cyborg right. Right, that is now being discussed. Right, this is where we're going. That is going to be what we talk about in the next decade twenty years, there
will be I'm not joking. This is the So we went from racial civil rights to gay rights, and then the next quote civil right is going to be related to transhumanism and maybe I'm forgetting it, like bcality or something like that's going to the bcality and pedophilia that will be discussed as a quote right, And make no mistake about it, You've heard it here on Higher Side chats.
Transhumanism and cyborg modification will be the next right. And all of that I think is being predicted and projected and displayed in AI and also in you know Redley Scot's Blade Runner, which is another chapter in the book.
And there's also quite a bit of Cabbalistic influence in AI too.
Right, Absolutely, this whole idea of word magic, and this is something that I did touch on too. I forgot to mention themes in Spielberg. You mentioned themes well, Language and meaning and interpersonal communication is a huge aspect of Spielberg. That's why if you remember in close encounters. The aliens don't know how to communicate with us, so they have to eventually use sound, and you know, they decode the sound, dude,
that becomes the form of language. But the Lacombe character, who's played by fran Squas Trufeau, the famous French director, is based on Jacques Belie, and he decodes this message. The way that he decodes is that he hears a bunch of Hindus singing the sort of chant. And if you study how Hindus view their chants, they actually view it as a ritual invocation. And so when you hit certain frequencies, they believe through sound your action harmonizing with
the wavelength where those gods reside. So what's weird is that the chant that they're actually putting out is a ya a a ya, which is very close to the tetragrammaton or yahweh.
Right. And of course Spielberg, being.
Jewish and being aware and I would say obviously familiar with Cabbalism, I think that's where he's coming from.
That's the vanished point he's coming from.
And so that's where you get to the the arguments that I make about things like using a period I period and then using E period t period. Right, these are done on purpose because letters are symbols, and they also have a lot of different meanings in Gamatria, or they can stand for different things in different schools of Cabbalism.
So where were we forgot? Where were we talking about calm in Ai? Oh oh in Ai?
Well, so, so there's word magic in Ai when his mom, David's mom says these magic words that give him consciousness. Now, I think that there's a lot of different things you might could read from that.
I would tend to stick it in the.
Gobbalistic narrative of because this is the idea of the Gollum, right, and this is Jewish mysticism, the idea of that you could use different Hebrew sounds and words and symbols to in a way be a theorist or be a creator and cause life quote unquote to be right.
She also touches buttons on his chakra points too, doesn't she.
Yes, that's a great point. She touches the back of his neck. I think if I recall and then says the magic words, and he supposedly is quote conscious, So now I don't believe that that actually we Willever create a conscious being like that, I think that will always be synthetic. It will always be in some way a kind of program. Anything that you program, it's only going
to do what is programmed to do my view. So, but I do think that you know, AI, transhumanism, all this stuff is developing to the extent that people will believe that it's conscious and that it's alive, and that that's how they will sell it as a new civil right, and then old humanity, old man will be declared obsolete, and you know, as they promote the new man the bought.
Yeah, man, I think this is so interesting, especially this idea of sci fi movies like ET and Close Encounters and War of the Worlds, this idea that they have cemented a lot of our thoughts about space and aliens in culture, even more so than real science has. And maybe it is to get us to accept demons as
cool via the alien skin. But I've also had some guests who are pretty far out there and in the flat earth territory, and they would say that Hollywood and NASA CGI is where we get our ideas of outer space, when really we're stuck in a snow globe and I don't think you're a flat earther. But if space is largely like it's depicted in films, are there other aspects that are being manipulated? Is it just the alien demon thing or do you think there's more to that sliver of the pie.
I don't believe that we really know what is out there. I think that there's a lot of different theories. And just like with the psyche, you know, people try to have these definitive declarations and pronouncements about what exists and what's possible and what's not possible, and they really don't know. And I think that's a big part of the system, is giving the impression that they do know a kind
of confidence game yeah when they don't. Now, I mean, yeah, a lot of things we do know in terms of science, but I believe that real science and real advancement in those regions those areas comes about in things like technology and engineering, computer science.
All that stuffs real.
NASA is a pr front under the aegis of the Air Force, So their number one job, that is the military, is lying.
To the public. That's what psyops is.
So you can't believe any of these declarations from NASA and just look at the fact that NASA, on the one hand promotes aliens and then turns around and tries to present itself as this totally scientific organization.
But it's not. It's a pr front. It's sentimately tied with Hollywood. That's why.
Really Scott was talking about how his movie Mars was released in tandem with NASA's supposed Mars discoveries. You know, when that last Matt Damon movie came out whenever, that was like a few months ago. James Cameron sits on the board of NASA directors. Why is this Hollywood director sitting I mean, I think that's all suggestive of deception.
I don't believe in the flat Earth because of the fact that you you can fly from Santiago to Sydney in eight or ten hours or so something like that, which is impossible on that goofy fletter map.
I don't think that.
I mean, the entire military and GPS and logistics would all be off, everything would be working all fucked up if the Earth were flat. My dad was in the Navy, he sailed around the globe. So I think that's a whole bunch of syops and ridiculous deception. In my view, I'm fine with people questioning things. I would tend to think that there's a good case to be made for geocentrism. I think you could argue that one. But no, I don't believe that we live on a pizza crest.
Yeah.
I mean, it's just interesting because if Hollywood's big aim is to kind of control the way we think or to make us feel confident about what's beyond our atmosphere, yeah, I just wonder if it's different in any way than what's depicted in the movies. I mean, we might never know.
Well, I do believe, I do believe that. I do believe it's different than what we're told in movies. But I think that Hollywood had its main goal or role in this regard in terms of promoting things like Darwinism. And you say, well, there's not that many movies that promote Darwinism. Actually all science fiction movies do, almost all of them across the board. Two thousand and one Space Odyssey is a gospel of Darwinism. So I'm very critical
of that in the book. And I don't approach Darwinism as most people do just from like a list of arguments that they run online or something.
I approach it as a philosopher.
That was my you know, grad training was in analytical philosophy. So I philosophically critique Darwinism in the book, and I try to argue that, you know, when you look back to figures like H. G. Wells, who was this committed Masonic socialist, a Marxist, committed why is he the guy who's promoting you know, the new global revolution through science through evolution. I mean these people are committed liars, Yeah, openly.
So I think that's suggestive. I mean nobody. I think you could argue that nobody else has had the impact on science fiction and science fiction films by extension to the degree that AHG.
Wells has, Right, I'd agree with that. And I don't know if you've seen Stranger Things on Netflix.
But yes, I did a lengthy analysis of it. Yeah.
Oh nice.
Well, what's kind of interesting about that in this context is it invokes all those eighties sci fi movies like et in Close Encounters, but yet it's very clearly about this being this entity brought through a portal via mk ultra torture.
So that's kind of interesting.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, if anybody's interested they can go to Jay's analysis. And I think there's an audio thing that I did and pretty popular written piece that I did that I don't know. I got about twenty or thirty thousand views on that, so it did really well.
It's worth checking out.
Yeah, And what I argue is that it's it combines cobblism, and it combines the idea of other dimensions portals all that.
So it's kind of obvious.
But what I found fascinating to begin with was that what sparked this in part was a lot of people in Hollywood wanting to play Dungeons and Dragons Believing or Rock. There was an article that came out in oh, I don't know, MTV or Din of Geek or one of those pop culture sites that was talking about how The Rock plays D and D weird.
So you were talking.
About The Rock earlier, and I'm not making too much out of that, but you wonder, you know, like we were talking about with actors.
Now.
I understand that D and D is a game. I used to play D and D when I was in high school. I know all about how it works and all that. But isn't it interesting that, as you were saying earlier with the idea of bringing down the gods or something like what could it also be something where people believe that they are, you know, really tapping into something. Yeah, and that's the thesis of you know, stranger Things, is that they sort of unconsciously tap into this portal, this realm through.
The D and D game.
Yeah.
Now, I don't I'm not approaching this like a fundamentalist in saying that, oh, if you play D and D You're going to like open up the gate to Hell and anything like that. But it does pose that interesting question of can we meddle with and tap into forces that are, be honest, that we don't understand.
Yeah, man, it's interesting. So what about let's another movie. Let's talk about the Goonies another Spielberg movie. Seems pretty simple and innocent enough on the surface, but there is more when you dig deeper.
Right. Yeah, I didn't make Goonies.
Didn't make it end of the book, but I wrote an analysis of it about a month ago.
And it was just one that I'd.
Always been, you know, intending to get to, and I never really got to it until I.
Was reading Chris Springmyer's book.
I read it like ten years ago and kind of forgot about it, and I got that back out and I was looking at that, and his chapter on the Asters made me think, now, wait a minute, Goonies is
about Astoria. So I read Oli Fritz's chapter, which was fairly well sourced, and then watched Goonies again, and I lo and behold, noticed the whole bunch of things I'd never ever noticed before, the first of which would be that when you look into the actual documented history of John Jacob Astor and the Astor family, all of that stuff is true. He was a high level Freemason grandmaster of a New York lodge. I believe he took his occultism seriously. But he was also a high level drug trader,
so that's all true. So the stories of him going from the fur trade to the drug trade through shipping, that's all true. And you can find the public documentation of all that, right damn, which I linked him in my article.
So that was interesting.
So I wasn't sure how to read that in a line of gooney, But then when I rewatched it, you notice that the Goonies are kind of going on this sort of national Treasure Nick Cage type journey to decode the Masonic history of their city, of that story, and that's what they do, and they discover, oh, actually we're founded by a bunch of scally wagged pirates. Now so
how is that relevant? Well, as we know from you know, people like Jordan Maxwell, I mean that the Jolly Roger flag is the flag of skull and Bones because it's the flag of we're not bound by any of your laws. We're transnational. So when sculling Bones and the Oss and these people took over that Jolly Roger symbol, they were saying, we are internationalists. We will run this drug trade outside of your national laws. We're not bound by any of
your stupid rules. We are the true elite outsiders. And so what's funny and ironic about goonies is that the goonies are going to have their houses all were closed on and was a country club is going to be built golf course, right, and so they're the outsiders who actually discover the jewels and then you know they're able to save the family and all that kind of stuff. So the irin is just ironic that they are the alienated outsider youth that identify with the pirates when they
decode the big Masonic myth of astoria. They find the treasure and they're able to you know, presumably they're wealthy, I guess, because they you know, he still ends up with jewels, like a bag of them, if you remember at the end. So anyway, I just I saw all
that weirdness going on. That's how I read it. And there's also some weird kind of phallic references in goonies, which I'm not sure what to make of, but you know, yeah, when we think about that in light of what Corey Feldman said, you know, I don't.
Know absolutely.
The I was something I was going to ask you about later on. It was Pizzagate kind of because child pedophilia in Hollywood has been a theme in a conspiracy for a long time, not only claims of passing around child actors, but also having underage kids play prostitutes.
And stuff like that.
Yeah, the political and Hollywood a leader very interrelated. I'm curious, what are your thoughts on the Pizzagate scandal or Hollywood's role in the abuse of children.
Yeah, I think I did three or four audios on pizza Gate. So if anybody wants to like a fuller breakdown, they can check those out, but sure. But yeah, I mean I think that it was pretty clear that there was some kind of black market operation going on that dealt with perhaps at least gay prostitutes or something like that. I mean, that's very popular in the DC scene, and that would also be connected to things like cocaine and drug use and all that and code words and all that.
So I know that I know all the arguments and everything about you know, what all of the code words mean and all this kind of stuff, but I don't know if there's definitive proof. And you know, that could have been intentional. They could have put something out that wasn't definitively proven. But what you can prove is, you know, Laura Silsby to get in trouble for going to Haiti and trying to bring a bunch of kids.
Out of Haiti. You can prove that. And yeah, you can prove that she was connected to the Clinton Foundation.
You can show that John Podesta made a lot of weird statements and you know, what does it mean when they're talking about a hot tub and.
Yeah, pizza a hot tub.
Yeah, so it's hard to say exactly what definitively what it is, and you know, was that a plan to sign off the alternative media? I don't know, But ultimately we don't need quote pizza Gate. You know that this kind of stuff is true because there's like a dozen other cases of the exact same thing, Right, So I'm not saying, by admitting that I don't know exactly what the situation Pete is, that that's not true. I'm just saying that I wouldn't be surprised because there's so many
other cases. We've got Savile, You've got the du trou affair in Belgium, You've got Franklin cover up, Craig Spence, you know, Johnny Gosh, the White House. You know, there's like and there's a whole slew of other books that you could find about this kind of stuff, the pedophilia and the Catholic Church. William Kennedy's book, Listener's Lodge, Malchai Martin's books have talked about it.
I mean, there's this book after book after book that have already dealt with.
This matter, right, And I agree with you that you don't need Pizzagate. It's just kind of one example of a theme that seems to be there for sure, and a lot of times you can get a better beat on things by looking at the aftermath. And it wasn't really until that shooter went into comment Pizza where I was like, oh, okay, so you put out a lot
of smoke that's unprovable. You then put do a false flag where a guy goes in with a gun, and then you say, Okay, we got to crack down on these alternative news sites because conspiracy is dangerous.
Now.
It's not just goofy and wrong, it's actually dangerous to even discuss stuff that doesn't come from CNN, MSNBC. So I totally see that being a possibility for the agenda there.
Yeah, And I'm just and I totally agree, like as a thesis, you know what I mean, Like I could see that thesis.
I could also see the thesis that this was.
A real operation going on, you know, with all the worst stuff imaginable. Yeah, but I just don't personally know. But what we do know is that, you know, there's court cases involving Epstein and his island and all the Clinton trips on the Epstein pedophile plan and Little Saint James.
I mean that's known of course. Man.
So we've talked about this idea that themes in film can give us an idea of what might be I mean even a decade beforehand. Sometimes, are there any newer film trends you see coming that concern you.
Yeah, let's see, I was trying to think of what sci fi type things I've seen recently that that hinted at that kind of stuff, because yeah, like I said, I think when you look back to something like AI or Minority Report, you know, like in Minority Report you're seeing targeted advertising and you know, retinal scanning, all that kind of stuff that was new to you know, two thousand and one or two. All that kind of stuff we're seeing more prevalent now, right. And so in AI
you see sex bots. This is all in the news now right. They're they're rolling out in the sex bots. This was in the Enemy of the State, it was an AI, it was in Blade Runner. Some of the replicants are sex bots. So I'm trying to think of recent sci fi movies that I've seen that might have new aspects of predictive programming.
But off the top of my head, actually I can't right now.
Well, there's you know, the two New Star Wars movies. I guess we already talked about Arrival. I haven't seen all that many sci fi movies in the past year or two either.
Yeah, And I think as I said, like Arrival and Star Trek, and I mean these kind of just have the more globalist minded propaganda of you know, anyone that's opposing And if you can, we mentioned Rand Corporation earlier. Rand Corporation had a direct connection to Star Trek. They were into some of the Rank Corporation people were involved in brainstorming ideas and based on stuff that was in Star Trek. You can find you can find papers on that at the Rank Corporation. So I'm not making that up.
And what's the whole idea of Star Trek is what, Well, we've got to have a federation that can rule all these unruly, you know, independent existing people groups, all right. I mean that's just globalism one on one. And Geene rodd Berry would actually talk about that openly. He would say, you know, I'm all for a little government. We got to have a new world order. This is the only
way to do things. And you know, though, the way we do this is to get rid of all these people thinking that there's a god and that they have their own traditions and that's all just got to be wiped away and we'll have.
You know, the Halo Deck.
Well, there you go, So Holodeck and VR that's what's coming.
Yeah, and I'm just trying to think of other movies. I saw X Men Apocalypse.
I thought that was pretty interesting, just because the Apocalypse character talks about being something ancient. Like there's a character who asks who are you, and he's like, Elohim raw. I've been called many names over many lifetimes. I am born of death. I was there to spark and fan the flame of man's awakening, to spin the wheel of civilization. And when the forest would grow rank and needed clearing for new growth.
I was there to set it ablaze.
And I think that's a pretty awesome dialogue.
But it's also pretty interesting.
Yeah.
Actually, yeah, I'm glad you mentioned that because I have written on Avengers and the Marvel stuff, and X Men is on.
My list to get to.
Actually, but if you go and read my my takes on Captain America and Avengers and all that, I think there's three or four articles I've done on those. It would be kind of the same themes. Because you've got like if you saw X Men first Class, that was crazy because they're like working with the CIA. They are a CIA project, which is just mind blowing. So all that's revealed, and I do think there's true to this, you know, the whole super Soldier idea. And I have
Chris Knowles's book. It's pretty good, so I'm glad you referenced him. But I just haven't seen Apocalypse yet. But I didn't know what to I was lost actually in the last X Men, the one before that, that where they went back to back in time, and yeah, like JFK Era and what is going on here?
Interacting with Nixon and JFK.
In alternate timelines, and it just kind of lost me in the confusion, and I didn't think it was that great, but there is. You're absolutely right to point out X Men and Marvel and all that.
Because they're just rife with everything.
All I can say is just check out my nalysis on those movies at Jason Alysis.
Yeah, and there were a lot of bombs when it comes to sci fi. In the last year. There was the remake of, I mean, the sequel of Independence Day. There was that movie that I thought looked interesting, Gods of Egypt that was apparently terrible. So the only one I've heard that was good that I haven't seen is the fifth Wave. I've heard that has some pretty interesting stuff in it because the first four waves are like, first they create, you know, if there's an alien invasion
and there's five waves of it. The first wave is create darkness, then widespread destruction, then infection, then invasion, and then the fifth wave is actually, once the planet is in its weekend state, then you swoop in and just take it interesting.
You know.
Actually I did see that movie advertise, but I didn't actually watch it, And the reason for that is that what I'm having to do right now is prep for the TV show that Jay Weener and I are going to do, and we're working on the first season, and it's going to be thirteen or fourteen episodes of first Ridley Scott, then David Lynch Movies in Spielberg, then Kubrick, then The Matrix and The X Files, Christopher Nolan movies, James Cameron, Roland, Plansky, Bond, Twin Peaks, True Detective, Godfather,
DaVinci Code, and then we're going to do an episode called Gnostic Cinema, which is snow Piercer, Westworld, and Dark City. So what I'm having to do right now is and this I just got this information a couple days ago, so I don't even have the time really to like watch the fun movies i'd want to.
I have to sit and rewatch.
All of these over and over and kind of plot out what we want to do with each one of these episodes and where we want to take it. So so that's what I've been working on, and our show will be I think in running in April on guy a TV.
Very cool.
That's exciting.
Well, right on, man, It's always great to talk to you.
I enjoyed it last time. This has been a blast too.
I like a guy who knows a shit, and you are.
One of those guys.
Thanks Greg, you got it.
And before we close the books, let the good people know where they can further scratch the Jay DIYer itch if they do want some more.
Yeah, you can go to jasonalysis dot com No Apostrophe, and I think I have there's over a thousand posts there. I've got over six or seven hundred articles. I've written one hundred and twenty or thirty movie reviews, and you can find all that information there else to do a podcast. For the last year that's gotten pretty pretty good traction. Now you can find all the free hours and then if you want to hear the full lecture talks interviews. I also do lectures on things like tragedy and hope
or Plato's Republic. You can subscribe to Jaysonalysis for four ninety five a month or sixty dollars a year. And if you want the book Esoteric Hollywood Sex Cults and Symbols and Film, you can. There's a PayPal button there, and I do outside the US and inside the US, and they are all signed copies. So I've got twenty five star ratings on Amazon so far. The book's only been out a month and it hit number one in Amazon's Film in Hollywood category, so boom.
And it is always best to get the books directly from the author if you can, to cut out that you know, monolithic Amazon middleman, right.
Exactly, Yes, thank you.
It does help me out a lot of you if you'll are a direct from me, and I ship those out every day so it doesn't take that.
Long, right on.
Well, awesome man, always a pleasure, I guess that brings us to the end.
Of the show.
Take care of yourself out there all right?
Thank you, Greg, you got it all right.
Fun stuff.
I really do like the Hollywood Breakdown guests because I've grown up being such a media junkie, and even though we all know it's a very persuasive tool, I think there are always new elements to discover, and I really think Jay is one of the best guys focusing on this area.
I like Mark.
Devlin for music and Jay Dyer for movies, and I thought a lot of great stuff was covered today. Probably most memorable for me is that idea of ET being about a conjured up spirit entity more than a space alien. It sort of strengthens the narrative of a concerted effort to put certain ideas into the culture about reality outside of our immediate environment and beings beyond it, an effort to depict magic, ritual and entities and paint it with
the brush of science, space and aliens. It's a curious case to make because you have to ask the why why would this be an agenda in Hollywood with cooperation from NASA and military intelligence and also a flooding of the alternative world with a bunch of space alien pushers too, if you think that's a part of it.
Some do.
It's very strange. Some would say it's because the elite were laying a base, because they planned a stage of false flag alien invasion in the future. First you fight nations like the Two World Wars, then you fight ideas like terrorism, and then you fight a completely fabricated enemy that you completely control with one hundred percent autonomy. Maybe people do say that, but I always found it to be a bit far fetched. Now, if you're a flat
earther or you already know why the directors are doing this. Obviously, they're crafting the space concept for the collective consciousness, projecting the futile possibility that we can actually rise beyond the dome that encapsulates this island Earth, a full spectrum deception of the highest order, the lie of life. Maybe I'm also not a flat Earth guy, but I will meet you in the middle and say that I love the prison planet concept about as much as the hollow Earth,
and you could fit this stuff in that box. Or it might be as simple as trying to expose the masses to occult entities and esoteric rituals and their cabbalistic belief system on the DL to Trojan Horse, the masses into the occult could be, but the lens of space and aliens does seem suspiciously significant, doesn't it. Maybe we'll never know exactly what motivates that machine, but I think it's pretty clear that those top directors, Spielberg, Kubrick, Cameron,
they serve an important function. I can't claim to know what it is fully, and even James seems pretty flexible as to the whys, which is great because it's very arrogant to think we'll ever get at one hundred percent. All we really can do is hold up different pieces, look them over and see which ones fit better than others, which perspectives and threads weave a tighter tapestry to get us closer.
To the truth.
But we're born into a completely different world, shaped by think tanks, wealthy industrialists, and international banking dollig archs who all have an interesting preoccupation with some occult belief system. Right right, Well, fucking a Jay Dyer. If you like the stuff we talked about in the first hour in the Plus show, we got into stuff like predictive programming in the Trump presidency specifically, and back to the Future
in Grimlins two. And you know, I was unaware that Jay had decided to throw his hat in Trump's ring, and I really don't care or judge him for it. It's just that everyone is so polarized now listener wise, that a lot of people are like keeping score with the guests, trying to make sure that their team is equally represented.
Don't be like that.
Some people are scoring me way to the right, and that is not fair because they're given right wing points for the Pizzagate shows, and that is an elite issue, not a right verse left one. I will not accept those points, and it's going to come up. It's coming up everywhere you look. But I'm spending less time on political topics and more on just the fringe where we belong.
But really, you shouldn't care about either political side, or at least you should be able to separate and appreciate a person's expertise and just sort of recognize their worldview, the lenses they look through. I mean, consider that in what they say, and then just see what you can
pull out and apply to your own paradigm. It's not really about every little thing or writing someone off completely because they see one of about an infinite number of issues differently than you do, or they take religion more seriously than you do. You know how I am on religion, and I still have guests that dear if I think
there's something I can appreciate about their work otherwise. But anyway, we talked about a lot of great stuff today in the second hour for those oh so supportive plus people, GI Joe being a conspiratorial Schmorgesborg, touching on almost all the major themes we hear about in the alternative realm military recruitment films where you might least expect them. Doctor Strangelove as an allusion to the Rand Corporation esoteric Hollywood
film shot on location at Rothschild Mansions. Also why the Tavistak Institute would be studying Hitchcock films, the role of seventies and eighties dystopia films like Labyrinth and The Dark Crystal, the films of David Lynch, Jay's thoughts on more recent films like Split and Arrival, and as icing on this crazy cake, we talked about Chuck Palino's work. I never know how to pronounce his name. I just take a shot and Survivor by the way, if you did hear
the Plus show. Survivor is his book that involves a hijacked plane.
I couldn't believe.
I couldn't think of it at the time, and we talked about a lot of other good stuff too. Just sign up for Plus already for only five bucks a month. This show is supported completely by the Plus program. I grew a pair and quit my shitty job managing a game stop, built the Plus infrastructure and never looked back. Guys, I try to be respectful of your time, give you a great show, and I offered up for just that
five bucks, and I don't bother you with any other stuff. Yes, I make t shirts based on episodes over at Higher Side Clothing, but whatever, I hope you see the contrast between me and other hosts the Higher Side and other shows and recognize even things like the difference in audio quality. I listened to a show the other day from a channel that I have been a fan of or a
follower of. THHD was even a thing one of the most well known in the alternative realm, and the host she still puts up her interviews on YouTube with the technical difficulties still in it, with terrible echoing throughout the entire show. It's just like if doing interviews, it's what you're gonna do for a living. Take a goddamn second to get the audio right and package it up nice for the people before you put it out there. It's
supposed to be your livelihood. So again, whatever, if you like the show I do, if you think I do a good job, go to the higher side chatsplus dot com and sign up. It's really easy. You can pay for three, six or twelve month chunks if you don't like five bucks a month. I have a robust frequently asked questions section on how to get the Plus feed into your podcast players of choice.
If you're worried about that, blah blah blah.
Right, well, it does mean a lot to be listener supported, and every host is just trying to get your money somehow. But I wait to the end, and I like to think that I spend less time pitching than any other show, and I like the content.
To speak for itself, So meet me in the middle here.
But again, Jay is always a welcome guest, fun and knowledgeable guy to talk to, and I have two more shows due out by the end of the super short month of February.
So I'm gonna get on it. That is it for me?
Your move, SoCal sorcers of eight millimeter magic and mental manipulation, Your fucking move?
Who?
No, you see the world days and random its attached.
To pub a stream control lover everything nine to five try to steal you now, don't that job seems silly?
Hello? Can you hear me?
Should I play back recordings from some spying agency? Should be wary, younger, Hell, I'll be thankful. Whens spokes the fast and speed. See, there's such a differences between.
Us and the damn girl show hallo rama. They're calling out now, they're going. They'll tell you the start away, the very late land spend done, and they'll call down day sad shute from the web that's been swalled. Palla rama. Oh there this homony? I like, that's a girl beloved songy and no well knows, well have you heard that about sad? Have you heard ab the real since long?
No?
There cartoons? It's so typical me to talk about this stuff.
I'm sorry, that's good.
And well did you ever.
Hear the argument that nothing really happens?
It's no see great and that the.
Bed stage place.
It's dube leaving your time.
Color the high they're calling through their they'll tell you move song pay He Captain and the dag sack shut from the webne space for plafa high, challenging your page and love, and they'll tell your mout Sony and the battles bager, but we can't find edge with vilas the mind verge once and the wall. That's the high they're calling now. They're kind. They'll turn your song. Hey. The Captain and the count said shut from the web mass priceful,
callous high like challenging your character. They'll turn you song hey that the battles being on the weekends p ridge with violence the wind. Where res one that's up
