Predictive Program Patsy: 1994 Illuminati Card Reveals Trump Sniper Ass*ssination Plot???

Welcome to the Agenda. Hello everybody, my name is Edward Zol and this is the agenda. What's on the agenda today, twenty thirty agenda. What's the agenda? Liberal Agenda. The w EF have been upfront about the agenda for us, it's my agenda for you. We's all's condi issues on our agenda. This agenda. This agenda applies to every nation in the world. It's a universal agenda. To the next subject on the Agenda. Episode two. Thank you so much for joining us on our last episode of the Agenda.

It was a great episode. People loved it, got about two hundred thousand views on Twitter. You know, we're looking to continue to inform the public through the dietsden the platform. We're very happy that you chose to join us for a second. One other thing, we didn't get banned from YouTube, so we didn't that's right, So we survived you too. We need to up the game a little bit and get a little bit more aggressive that

algorithm. Let's see Rumble. We're on there as well on Rumble, but we're crushing it on x so we'll continue and thank you for viewing that. Share this. Tell your friends we've got exciting news today. Yes, Well, today's agenda we're going to be looking into predictive programming. So the weekend had honestly a very dark day for this country. Still we don't know all the facts, and we're about a week now from the actual assassination, and

of course I'm talking about the attempt to kill President Trump in Pennsylvania. Now we're going to have on the program here shortly, JAYE Dyer, who is an expert on predictive programming, on esoteric Hollywood narratives. I mean, he's someone that's looked into that there's not just the facts the abuse and all the other weird things in Hollywood, it actually has an agenda behind it. Yeah, he's very well versed in it. He's written two books. It looks

like he's writing a third book. Been wanting to talk to him for a while, so I'm excited to talk to him. Uh, this is a subject that a lot of people will say, come on, you know, you're tell me The Simpsons, know you're telling me these these you know TV shows, The X Files predicts it. It's happening too much right this where there's smoke, there has to be some fire. So I I think that in this in this spiritual world we live in, there are evil entities that

govern people and will use them like the Holy Spirit uses us. We want to be driven and be guided by the Holy Spirit to do His will, and so we come together and a union to profess Christ and be used in that body. The same thing with the evil plans. They're going to be governed and use. So are they given extra knowledge to to tell us their plans? Well, the devil has been attempting to imitate God since the beginning of time. We know that God has prophecies. We know that God foretells

the future. He's told us how it ends. I think that the devil, the devil, he lied to him and Eve. He tried to tell God how job was going to act. He's tried to predict the future in a lot of ways, try to imitate it because there's a certain lesser magic to that. And if you don't think that stuff's real, I'm going to show you some things today with Matt that I think is going to change your mind. The first thing, by the way, the subject of killing President

Trump. We know for the other side that's not anything new in the sense that they've been wanting to kill him since twenty sixteen. But there is something I think that is relevant to this past weekend. You may or may not know this, but there is a card deck that they call him the Illuminati. Of course, the secret society group, way worse than Freemay. It's kind of like the game Magic before. I think this was before Magic nineteen

ninety four. I think these decks the original deck was conceived in like seventeen seventy five, nineteen seventy five, rather nineteen seventy five. But we're talking. The latest sideration was some updated art is nineteen ninety four, so well before. But there's an article here in the Daily Express. This is from twenty seventeen. It reads Illuminati card game that four told nine to eleven and Diana's death predicts trump assassination. Okay, this was twenty seventeen. Yes,

the beginning is February thirteenth, seventeen, so twenty seventeen. They are aware of this, right, yeah, Trump, let's see, yeah he was, he was right before his presidency, right, twenty seventeen, and they are showing these cards. And when I saw this card, my first thought was that picture of Trump. This picture. It's the I mean, you told me it looked like the devil. Okay, yeah, but for me that looked like Trump. Oh, it definitely looks like Trump, so much

so that the Daily Express made that connection. And again, this photo of President Trump is from twenty eleven. Right. The photo on the left is one of the cards in the deck. Enough is enough, and the card reads, actually this is from the article, and we have the deck here. We verified this. At any time, at any place, our snipers can drop you have a nice day. So their prediction twenty seventeen, in

nineteen ninety four was an originally predicted or used that card? Who would have foresaw Trump in twenty twenty four, that a sniper would try to kill he? Who would have thought he would be a president? Right nineteen ninety four. Yeah, So then essence, well this card so twenty eleven mirrors this nineteen ninety four image. Now we go to twenty twenty four. Boom, we have an assassination attempt on him, you know. And it's interesting about

this assassination. I was reading through this article that was written in twenty seventeen, and it spoke about the last assassination attempt that was kind of attempted to be carried out against President Trump, and it reminded us we'd forgotten this. There was a British citizen, Michael Sandford, who tried to try to grab a policeman's gun at a rally in Las Vegas. And this guy had autism. Oh yeah, I remember the autistic felt I remember that. Yeah,

so this this was an interesting thing here. And look, I bring up this card game just to kind of lead us down this route of a lot of these things. The enemy, the devil, especially the Satanically, they love to plan things out in the public eye. Now, we were looking into this subject today because there's a lot on the subject of predictive programming or revelation of the method. Sure, and you know, I was going through

this. There is an interesting article from a left wing outlet. And again these aren't like white right wing kooky outlets, you know they like they like to call us. Now, this is is the left wing out like that. It's considered to be reparable CounterPunch. It's like a communist outlet. Actually, they were looking into the subject in April twenty nine, twenty twenty two,

the subject being revelation of the method. Now Broadberry. He actually quoted a CIA director, William Casey, is saying that he said this to Ronald Reagan. Will know our dense information is complete when everything the American public believes is false. Now, of course this quote has never been confirmed, but it actually is right in line with what we think the CIA is up to. Now I was reading through this. This is actually quite an interesting read.

And this speaks directly to the concept of manipulating the public. So I'm going to read through some of this for you. They said here fast forward thirty years and there's no piece of fiction. The masses will not swallow. Now, I think, right now, Matt, Right now, we look at news, we look at information. Generally speaking, the public they do not trust anything that comes out of the mainstream media, even though of the

government, and rightfully so. And the reason is is because most of their narratives in these whose catastrophes seem to be false when you look at it, what the original narrative was, doesn't the facts don't equal out, or this such a disparity like nine to eleven. You look at all these war games going on, these norad was called down. You look at OKJFK almost everybody believes that it was some kind of inside job or conspiracy to kill him.

So what they've what they've done, right, is muddy. The water is so much that we can call it something. It is not like we don't believe the narrative, right, but it's no one could get a concise viewpoint on it. That there's no truth. The truth is now gone right, The truth is not a consensus anymore. Their truth is their truth. And then you have these conspiracy theorists. Then now that's their truth, right. Well, and when it comes down to that, I think many people they

didn't think that the government or intelligence agencies operate like this. Well CounterPunch was pointing out this is straight from the manual for the intelligence agencies. And two things are inch important here. First, well, this is right after the vaccine mandates, so left wing people were impacted by the mandates just as bad as the right wing folks. So I think a lot of people start waking up cause it mentions in here the COVID Change Society. But one I wanted

to point out. It also even gave a definition for this predictive programming. It's actually very apt, says predictive programming is the theory of a hidden hand operating the levers of reality, a sort of reality adjustment bureau, obstucating real

world events through film, literature, and media manipulation. It says a form of psychological conditioning that reduces people's resistance to the acceptance of planned future events and encourages them to swap concrete reality structures for static constructs, until eventually our inherited worldview is replaced by mythology and archetypes. So we see this like in film No Doubt, and you think about how could they get it so right? Right? Like, how did they how did this this movie nail it ten

years beforehand? Uh? And then you think, well, who was involved in the in the script writing. You look at Stanley Kubrick's films. We look at the moon landing with these and we know that these were government officials involved with the filming In some of his movies. We look at the Minister are goats, right, and this was derived from an army sciot program, Right, So then they make a movie about it. Now it's in our in our Lord, it's in our and we can relate to it and see

it. Uh. Everything is like you blur the lines of reality and fiction, right, and it becomes what is real now? Right. But the one thing is for sure is there are people who are orchestrating our reality through entertainment, through film well, and when it comes to us, it's an

effective medium. And that's, you know, probably the greatest conversation we can have right now, past obviously breaking down the holes in the official story of President Trump's attempted assassination and honestly talking with Jay, you know, I'm really looking forward to this conversation with him. What we need to be doing is we need to be thinking past the false reality that's being painted for us.

There is predictive programming and worseness. Revelation of the method afoot. That revelation of the method is is simply the concept that the elite, the enemy, they have to show you what they're about to do, and by doing so,

they've gotten your permission to commit violence against you. Yeah, there's a form of witchcraft to this, for sure, and it's do they gain more power if they tell you and put it out in the either like we're going to do this now, please, minions and all these demons or whatever like work forward towards this and it brings more power. It's very esoteric, but we do know it's real because we see it play out well with no further ado. We're going to bring in our guest, Jay Dyer. He is

an author, comedian and now quite quite an analyst. Do you host the fourth ab info us? And now who's joining us here on the ejecta. It's a day I think many of us are are trying to just weave through the various plots of disinformation that have been set. Look, when something like this happens, you start. I started gathering information everything. We need to just get all because sooner or later things are going to disappear. Narratives are

going to change, things are going to be erased. So it's just like gather everything now and kind of we through it and see what it is. And when we had the thought of having Jay on, well this didn't this transpire, The shooting had not happened. So we're going to talk to him about predictive programming. But this is actually perfect because we're in the middle of something that could have been predicted and we've been programmed to believe narratives as we

the collective not mean you were Jay, because we've seen through this. But yeah, Jay, first of all, what are your thoughts this give us kind of the breakdown on what you think, what your analysis is on everything. Well, I did an interview with Roger Stone for the fourth hour of Alex John's about six months ago exactly, and we batted around the possibilities of what they would roll out as the election drew near, and we felt like

one of the cards would definitely be a potential assassination attempt. And of course that's obviously I think what we saw the other day. There's a lot of questions about the event. We've seen already two witnesses come forward saying that they

had alerted the police. We've seen multiple former CIA people from the Secer service noting that it's very bizarre that you wouldn't have the most obvious, yes, location for somebody to perch themselves to be checked and so that according to former c A, unless Larry Johnson suggests either will full complicit uh planning perhaps or just insane levels of negligence. Maybe we have too much de I we've got too many uh fupa gunted women out there trying to be secret services. I

don't know, but yeah, it's always looking. That was all I don't tell you. Yes he is not. Is that that mindset of me and you? But yes, probably can't talk about that on your show. No, No, you can't, truthful hair, I just don't know, yes, but I mean could I mean it probably could have taken a few of

those bullets I guess to protect Trump. Okay, guys, it's just a frontal area of upper upper Yes, So let's get into kind of this, uh, this discussion of predictive programming then and and oh what the what the reason we had on was because in Hollywood we see these things and you've written two books about it, and what do you how how can you relate that to this? Is there anything that you've seen? We have we should we

have seen this coming. We're going to talk about these Illuminati cards that that came out in nineteen ninety four that are very eerie. Let me put this question to you, because I'm very curious how you see it. Do we live in a world of life imitating art? Or is the art imitating the

life? Which which? Which? How do you weigh that? Yeah, I've been asked that many times since I wrote the first book, and I think it's a symbiotic relationship between both, so you're going to have influence from the world of art and then art influencing you know, the real world back and forth. I do think there's a lot of key, you know, films that have kind of pointed out this sort of a scenario. There's the Parallax View, which has Warren Beattie back in the nineteen seventies kind of being

a mind controlled patsy for a political assassination at a rally. We have I think Stephen King's Dead Zone with Christopher Walking, while right, you've got Walking predicting through premonitions that somebody might engage in an assassination at tap against a politician. There's the Marky Mark movie what's it called Shooter, where he's a patsy, and a lot of these I think pull from probably the narrative around Oswald as a patsy and not the actual planner and you know, mind behind the

JFK operation. And I think, you know, most Americans nowadays have already through polls, admitted that they don't believe the official story of the JFK event. There were subsequent inquiries after the time of the Warren Commission, there was going to be a whole nother commission that got shut in down because information to come to life that there were certain organized crime figures who had been cheering on

the fact that the Kennedy's had been taken care of. So I think people kind of are figuring out that a lot of what we've been told probably isn't the real true story, and that times at times that's reflected in fiction.

But also fiction does seem to curiously have that predictive quality or feature. And that's kind of what I investigated in my books was it's not totally My books aren't totally dedicated to programming, but it's a big part of what I talk about because in some cases I think there's coincidence, you know, dates that

come up in movies and this kind of stuff. But in other cases, I do think there is a pattern and a real technique of perhaps softening up the public two ideas that you want to ease them into or inculcate them with, ideas relating to the acceptance of technology, the acceptance of propaganda. Even on a really kind of basic level. Probably people are familiar with product placement.

I mean, product placement is not exactly predictive programming. But it gives us a window into the way that you know, companies might pay to have subliminal messaging even or overt messaging to push an agenda, and likewise the government. By the way, just last point here, there was a FOI request some years back. I put it in my second book where they had declassified several thousands of pages of documents actually relating to intentional propaganda that various government and

intelligence agencies had paid for in countless TV shows going back several decades. And this included TV shows as innocuous as Cupcake Wars, where basically the military had paid to have you know, positive military messages, recruitment messages. CEEIA obviously has done this for a long time as well to Cloyd's Hollywood, going all the way back to the OSS was very intimately involved in helping directors like John Ford win an Oscar. So that's the predecessor to the CIA. So this

is a long fascinating relationship. It's a rabbit hole I tumbled down in grad school that I didn't expect to be so vibrant. I guess you could said. So one thing is we tend to look at these things to the lens of evil, because a lot of these things are them projecting what their plans are for us. Per se the movie Topia we put we cut a trailer to it for Diet Suddenly because it was basically the same premise, and I didn't even know about the film at the time, and co director Nick pointed

it out. It's eerily similar to a madman wanting to sterilize the world to a vaccine. The component of the mockery of the victim as a show of macab arrogance, when done in a veiled or symbolic fashion and deliciting no significant response of opposition from that victim, is one of the most efficacious techniques of psychological warfare. Your father created a world changing, not world ending, world's changing, world improving omnivirus. The event to a one scenario is fictional.

Created a panic. And now everybody's speaking for the vaccine. No, no, no, demanding it with all the entitlement of a first world country. Yes, and now we have exactly what we want, hundreds of millions of Americans lining up, offering us their arms and letting us give them our creation. I'm pretty sure when every vaccinated person starts dyingle trace back. What we are doing is far bigger than death. Tell me this, what have you

done today to earn your place in this crowded world? We've got that stabilize the population. So what's wrong of the population. I mean, we're too many people. That was the amazing epiphany we had. We didn't have to kill to accomplish our goal, which is what we intend to stop human reproduction for three generations. Busy, endless global assembly line of babies. We'll grind

do all they're sterilizing people. In the first five years, we'll start to see major birth rate declines as teenagers vaccinated today in their child bearing years. I've been doing high risk obstetrics for forty three years, and I've seen death and destruction like I've never seen before, Twelve one hundredfold increases in menstrual abnormalities. Japan's Prime minister has warned that the declining birth rate is putting the future

of the country at risk. You're controlling the future and civilization. One hundred years ago, the global population was one point seven billion. Two thousand eleven, it reached seven billion. Global warming, mass extinctions, food water shortages, all these problems can be boiled down to one thing over population. You can't just decide people won't have babies because I didn't. And it is an ancient rule of both the moral and the common law that silence cannotes ascent.

They bragged to us about what they've gotten away with, and we're thrilled by it. That's our only response. It's thrillian that and then wait for the next thrill. This is collective suicide. Of course, how much as a fellow Christian can you think maybe that God is allowing us to peek inside of this and to maybe give us clues right in the divine intervention of foreshadowing some of this thing so we can warn the public. And there is something to

that. I think that's perhaps divine providence or maybe even you could say a kind of spiritual clairvoyance, holy spirit kind of giving people premonitions. A classic

example this would be the famous Orthodox Christian writer Fido Dosievsky. He wrote a book called The Possessed it's also alternately titled Demons, and in that book, this is a few decades before the Bolshevik Revolution, when the radical Marxist socialists basically killed what would eventually be sixty or so million people, and one of the characters in the novel says that they will have to bring about their revolution on a giant mountain of millions of skulls. So it kind of predicts this

coming bloodbath revolution. Other things that Doscioevsky wrote, but probably his most famous section would be the chapter Grant Inquisitor, where he predicts a kind of a massive falling away in the church, particularly the Roman Catholic Church, and that

example. And so I think that sometimes fiction can just have that unique quality of being kind of prophetic, and other art works as well, And don't want to restrict it to just you know, authors or novelists, but there's also in the history of film and novels as well, because a lot of for example, intelligence writers, they'll take the stories that they learn in the real world and then they'll go and put it into fictional film accounts, and

so you have, you know, stories that spies would write. For example, I wrote my masters. I did my master's work on James Bond and Ian Fleming, and a lot of Ian Fleming's real world operations he would put into his Bond stories and kind of change the details a little bit kind of make it into something kind of, you know, kind of a little cartoonish

and ridiculous, but there's a lot of truth in those. For example, you mentioned the idea of a sort of a scientific a man trying to cleanse the earth and repopulate it, and that's kind of the plot of Moonraker in the novel. It's a guy who wants to get revenge on England for World War Two, and he's a national socialist, a minded person's names Hugo Drax. He's kind of the Bond villain who wants to depopulate He wants to do

a great reset on the West in revenge. Now, in the movie version of it, they make it very kind of star warsy with Bond being up in space and all that, and they actually make the villain and Moonraker into somebody who wants to not just cleanse the earth and depopulate it, but repopulate it with his own offspring. So I was going to say, exactly like Epstein. It's like Epstein got his idea from Moonraker or something exactly crazy.

As me and Edward we are in New Mexico that they Epstein killed himself supposedly and to interview Congressman Maclas mcclowsky. So Congress of mcclowskey had a little bit too much to drink, and we was like, we can't interview him today. So we me and Edward we went over to Zora Ranch and we we we went two miles through a desert up his hill and we went on the

Zora Ranch property the day that he had killed himself. And you can just feel have you ever been somewhere where you just feel that could press the heaviness? Yeah, it was a dark place. You could feel that we were on ground and the ground felt like it felt it was like a like a cemetery. I feel like therapy in the beautiful lush thing. But yeah,

I flew a drone into the thing and it was a surreal moment. But uh yeah, there there you go again where maybe he didn't have moon Breaker on his repeat and got the idea, but that same I would say, maybe not demonic presence, but that oppression, that same kind of whatever that is that that wants to uh push those ideas and move in our in our

in our world. They grab a hate to these people and you see it in film and you see it in and with Kubrick, you know, and a lot of his work, but pertaining to this, so we look at I want to I got to ask you this too, because this is like the cliche thing with the Simpsons. Have you done what is the what's your thought about the Simpsons? Is it just random things they get right? Or and if they do get anything these things right, where does it come from?

Like what are your thoughts? Well? I think the best explanation for that is kind of what I was mentioning a second ago, which is a lot of people who worked in intelligence then they go and they write novels, they write fiction and they write screenplays and this goes back as a long tradition

going back to what British intelligence operators would do. And they would do this because in the UK they have a little bit more stricture on whether they can and can't say after they have that service of time in the government, so a lot of times they are because there's Secrets Act, they can't talk about

what they did, so they just write these stories into fiction. And a lot of classic British writers famously you know that we know of that are famous, like Graham Green or John Lecaara these characters, they were famously British intelligence operatives. So the same idea goes on, I think with American cinema as well, where a lot of people that formerly worked in the CIA will write screenplays, or they'll they'll go and consult in Hollywood and so forth. So

that's I think part of the source of it. And in the case of the Simpsons, I think what's going on is that a lot of those examples, if you get if you dig into them, a lot of them are kind of coincidental, but some of them do seem to be pretty odd and prophetic, and I would say that the reason for that might be that the writers and some of the writers and producers that have been there for a long time come out of Evergreen College, and Evergreen College is a pretty famously known

kind of CIA connected school. So my guess would be that people have kind of inside information that they then seed into the fiction that they write. Or it's are you familiar with the bottom Mindhoff phenomenon frequency, I know about that group. Yeah, Well, where you like, say you want avol though,

and then you just start seeing volvos everywhere. We tend to want to see conspiracy a lot of times like what's happening now that poor woman who was like she's like picking up her phone, Like, now where the manhunt is for this woman? What does I mean? You studied psychological warfare at graduate school, Jay, so maybe you can speak to us. Is that part of the way to maniflc the public is also diversions? She has all these

little rabbit holes are people being sent down? Like again the video that Matt is talking about, this woman's a single screen here. She they can't even really make out what she's doing, and they say, oh, look she's making a smirk or something like this. Look, at least from my perspective looking at that, it's thought, maybe she didn't even know that there was a shot that had gone out yet chaos. I've been to twenty of these

things covering it. I feel safe there because it's so well like secured, and we when we checked our baggage in in the morning, the dogs they snipped there. I would I was very secure when I was there. Then I think something could happen. I thought maybe someone could rush him and make a knife for some blunt object. The shooter they're claiming took the shot and

took several shots at the president and the rally. Uh, they're saying that he was inside the inner court on like it's but in four hundred meters or

four hundred feet rather of the president. And first of all, that that area, it's it's so secure, like you can't walk across the field with a rifle, can't definitely can't go up into a building, the nearest high rise building, you know, in relation to where President Trump was speaking without there being a huge fury of of of officers and official see, especially at

points of vantage that a sniper might use. That's what's so crazy, and that we have so much It's like, this is amazing because the before in the sixties, we had this z Appruder film, right, that's it. We were searching and we had one thing and they spliced it. Like now we have all these angles and we're piecing together, and now the narratives get spun and now it's like, how can we shape the narrative maybe to divert

what the actual story is. So we're trying to piece all this together, and it look if you try to look at the facts, right, because that's true. As one of the ways to beat the propaganda, Jay is to try to really hone in on the things which are verifiable, you see, right, and then and then we can argue with snarily one of the things. I think Laura Ingram was pointing this out. And at this point it's a confirmed fact that Quantago has the shooter's phone. They claiming they can't

break it, they can't get into it. Yet they've already concluded that he was a lone gunman. He worked by himself, and how could they possibly have concluded? Yeah, I have a question for Jay for this. So me and and we've traveled a lot of together. We are in upstate New York, and we said, let's go to Sandy Hook because I wanted to see the route that Adam Lanza would took. Right. So we go there

and we drive and me and him are driving looking for the house. And we're in his neighborhood, beautiful neighborhood, and we're driving up and down. We can't find it. We see this is the address. The house was bulldozed, and this the overgrown weeds. They didn't they didn't re make another house on it, then sell it, just let it, let it go back to nature. That's what by a neighbor in the middle of a neighborhood. Right, So on this vein, on this whole thing, where are

you at? What is your initial thoughts? Because Sandy Hook was trending. Yeah, oh yes, that's another Sandy Hook was trending. There's a reason why. Right. Well, the first thing that's odd is that suddenly, at least from the left perspective, now you can question events and say that they're staged. So, you know, the left and the mainstream media has browbeat everyone for a long time that you can't question these kinds of events because

it doesn't fit the narrative of course that the system establishment wants. So but now you can, and now you're supposed to question this because it doesn't fit into the idea that Trump would be genuinely persecuted, uh, and that they might try to take him out. But again, we've been talking about this, uh, you know, Alex Rogerstone, Tucker, myself, many people have been saying that it's pretty obvious. I think I don't even think there's

any like special you know, prognostication involved. And I think everybody realized that if Trump continued down the route of uh, you know, making all of these anti establishment statements and whatnot that he that they might resort to something like this, And it looks like if the law fair of the legal attacks didn't work, this might be a final resort. That's my obvious. I think

that's pretty obvious that that's what's going on. And uh, you know, as Alex has pointed out, they're going to continue to try to probably go after Trump. Uh So it's not like everybody's kind of celebrating, which is fine, but I mean they're gonna try again. I mean it's not like they're kinda just let all this go. And I think we all feel like, yeah, that's that's we've all thought that, right, because they at least the virus, like I believe, you know, COVID was a coupe

to get mailing as say, usurped the system. Okay, then one, what are they afraid of? Because Trump's been in office, he didn't lock anybody up, the world income crashing down, he gives a second attempt at it. What's the fear then? Yeah? Yeah, And I don't have

any problem. I mean I'll have criticisms of Trump as well. I think the issue is that both of the the people that, for example, came out with the UK think tank, I think the Integrative Initiative or whatever it was called, that came out with the story of Russia Gate Pgate, all that nonsense. They said in some of their white papers that the effect that the audience of Trump hass to awaken too things much quicker than any other leader

or group. So it's not even necessarily Trump himself, but they're worried that the Trump audience, the Trump Yeah, that that that the information circulates so quick and then people wake up even quicker. I mean, you know, you've all said that they would have to do anything they could to stop another Trump administration because the quote global world order would be and collapse, and if it happens, it is likely to be the kind of like the death blow

to what remains of the global order. And he says, and he says it openly what you answer you asked part of your question though too. I think maybe that is one of the things that they fear again, having someone that you can speculate about President Trump's motives, the things he has go for about that, I think again, he did get shot this past week and he definitely was being prosecuted. So you know, as you kind of mentioned

Jay, this man doesn't have a lot left. You know that if if you were to just drop outor if he were to be bought and paid for in this manner, they've already kind of treated him as an enemy they would kill. And secondly they also see him, I think, as he's a bullhorn for the public. I like that. I agree with the pomp list thing we saw on in France, how quick that turned around from a part already the hendy been established and they and they were able to stop that.

Right. Even if Trump, you know, is again not a perfect candidate, he still represents, as we said, the population in Middle America who and they hate so they you know, the overall Uni party establishment hates Middle America, They hate the Bible bell, they hate the South with a passion. And I think we saw that with the reactions with a lot of the leftists after this event, you know, pretty much cheering it on, wishing

that they had been that the shooter had been successful. And you can tell that this seething sort of soy rage that they have is the desire to kill the rest of us. And my concern is that that's the kind of spirit, the kind of attitude that you see in a population before something like a bullshit revolution, before something like, you know, a potential civil war kind of sigh op that they might want to kick off. So my concern would be that a lot of this is intended to kick off a quote civil war.

We saw the recent Alex Garland film that came out that was I think a lot of propaganda civil war. There been many other films pushing this Obama's right that produced uh world, Look, I got my wife, Mike, my wife, big mic. But we told right about this predictive program. Why would Obama get right into a Netflix contract? There's so much power there right with with any documentary that comes out on because you know, that's my

forte is when it goes to Netflix. That's that's where they put their official narrative. The Flight fifty seven or whatever, or the nine to eleven or the Sandy Hook documentary. They pump out the documentary because then people will be like, well I saw the documentary, and that's just how it is. What's more powerful, isn't it? It's actually more powerful in all the political

positions. Well, look, look died suddenly. That the thing was so powerful is because people got to see things that the mainstream was showing them or the narrative that they're being fed, and they actually got to see real life horror film come to life. Well, Jay, you, I would say, were among the few that actually predicted in a way that the elite would go to this extent, you know, try to kill President Trump. They would actually make a shot at his life. Do you think they're going to

try this again? Is this at this point because it's a failed assassination, let's just call it what it is right now, failed assassination. There's going to be a grand inquirer investigation, probably a grand cover up. Will they try it again? Or do you think President Trump is going to respond it away to this, that he's actually going to tone down a lot of the things which which led them to think that he's going to threaten their lives and

their their powers. Well, if we look at the past scenarios, this would kind of be reminiscent of the Reagan attempt, right because Reagan was speaking about the Council on Foreign Relations, the global elite, the you know, steering committees above government that are the real power structure. And you know a lot of people think that Bush Senior the Bush crime family that that was who

might have had a hand in a role in that warning. You could say, so if the attempted hits don't work, then they function as pretty powerful warnings. And so I would say yeah, and again I agree with Alex that you know, if that doesn't work, then they'll move to something else like uh, you know, poisoning or some you know, truck bomb or

something like that. Definitely, don't you believe that that would be creating a mortar of like the high that would even if they're trying to avoid this populous uprising or do you think they would want to disco chayo, No, I don't think they are. Oh I seeious saying no, No, Well I

think that. I mean, they weren't concerned about creating a martyr h two days ago, so now I think they they think that either either they think that they could have put in you know, Nikki Haley or somebody else in Trump's place, or they want to create some kind of civil war uprising scenario which they think they could clap down and pretty much crush the populist movement.

Again, there were similar patterns to this at the time of Reagan. At the time of very goldwater where candidates were beginning to question the global institutions of power. They weren't getting everything right, it wasn't perfect. But then you have these kinds of big moves like this that try to shut it all down and try to scare everybody. The same thing was happening in the late eighties and early nineties with there was a rise of populism and patriotism, and the

Oklahoma City bombing event shut all that down. Now we know Trump had the FBI wired taps, we know that the Three letter agencies they were pissed at him. We've never seen such a deliberate attack on a candidate that then eased wire taps and all these things, these dossiers. How much danger we in in this in this country specifically that we're allowing these agencies that produce mk ultra and is this may be where we need to look at who the true culprit

is in this. Yeah, I think there's an embedded to break away security establishment that works for the corporate banking elite that run the West. It's that simple, That's who it is. And so it's not the CIA doesn't run everything, but they're kind of like the worker bees that do a lot for

this establishment. They were set up by this establishment. The British intelligence operatives that help set up the OSS and CIA are the worker bees for the Rose Rothschild Milner Fabian elite that were, you know, the founders of the Royal and Supernational Affairs, and that's the basis for the Trilateral Commission, the CFR, et cetera. So these institutions are all Fabian in their ethos explicitly, and they have an internationalist event. That doesn't mean that neo conservatism isn't also

part of it. They'll work with the neo conservatives who are basically just reform Trotskyites anyway. So they're all part of the kind of the same monopoly capital Fabian structure, and they want to impose a new type of technocratic governance. And that's why you mentioned like mk ulture, that kind of stuff. If you go into the history of mk ulture, it actually transitions away from h

drug research and that kind of stuff into transhumanism. It becomes MK search, MK delta turns into implantable chips, nanotech basically what they do it like DARPA. So so that's all public information. So so yeah, that's why ultimately this relates to things like the Great Reset, because the Great Reset was about kind of rolling out, or attempting to roll out, or testing the emerging

technocratic landscape that they want to present everybody. That's why Klaus's book or the Those Revolution, the last third of that whole book is about Skynet and basically the giant ai Con control grid. So that's the ultimate goal and everything we

look out for, the what the EMFs and the grid we're on. And when that goal was, you know, he's people programming that this will happen as cyber attack, as he as he's so much famously said, a comprehensive cyber attack which would bring a complete hold see power line, copulation, hospital, soviets our society. As a hope, the Kuba nine King causes would be seen inspect as a small spill in comparison to a major cybert Well, you mentioned those cards, those Eliminati cards. Yeah, I mean, I

mean, I don't put a whole lot of stock in cards. It's not it's not like David Rockefeller and Savinia Presents, Ki and Klouds are all sitting that with like the card deck in there. I'm gonna throw down the assassin. Colord read the card with YEA. So we have this card. It's up on screen to enough is enough? So we were shown this side by

side. It's it's eerie how this photo on the card, which was picked in at least nineteen ninety four, it could be as far back as seventeen, nineteen seventy five, but this picture looks a lot like President Trump's photo in twenty eleven. Is you just seeing you on screen? And it says on here at any time, at any place, our snipers can drop you.

Have a nice day, bro. I mean, like, I'm sorry, I'm just like when there's smoke, there's there's fire around is and I know this gets in the woohoo and all that, but it is real. Just the person that created the card deck was like communing with spirits and then like we us a report. I want to hear. Sorry. Yeah. So by what I recall, many years ago, Alex interviewed somebody involved in the creation of the card deck, Steve jack somebody connected to Steve Jackson,

who's the guy that created the card deck? And I think that the answer is pretty clear that these these people had at some level summ I think tied to I think LaVey's Church of Satan. I'm not saying that with Steve Jackson himself. I don't remember exactly, but I don't think that the LaVey and Satanism is actually involved in real like they don't believe in an actual They're not

theistic Satan, This are more atheistic. But it doesn't matter because again I think that even that entity probably has had pretty close connections to the CIA as well over the years. The CIA usually wants to be interested in and have connections to every cult, every movement, every religious organization out there. Yeah. So I think that whoever was creating the cards understood the world well enough

to know that these cards can be played. And that's you know. When I was talking to Roger Stone a few months ago and we were talking about this, we were speaking of it as if it's a card deck that you can throw the cards down, when we were referring to the Illuminati card deck as a joke, saying that you could throw down the assassination or throw down the pandemic card, throw down the you know, banking crisis collapse card, throw down the cyber attack card. So yeah, they can throw down any

of these cards. I think. I think, as we talked about predicted prom I think they do in a sense. Do that event to a one was basically the exact war game of what we saw transpire a month later in October, they did it. Now now we're going to go into another war game with the bird flu in October, so expect another round of what we just went through. I think to what Jay you were talking about earlier, with this advent to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, we have advanced AI, neural

AI networks. I've long wondered if you cause we talked about the wargames, what a war games do the produces date lots of Like even this past week, seeing how people responded to President Trump's potential assassination, they got to see a lot of things, how people responded, what they're gonna say, how they're gonna act. And I think that data it possibly gets fed into a supercomputer when the supercomputer will be able to tell the elite that's what AI is.

It's this algorithms, that's all I think. That's what Yeah, I'm sorry, yeah, but at a super level, we know the Utah computing system in Utah, right, the houses all the storage. It's just being fed to. They've already admitted this that they can shape through media our reality to project what we'll do right in a eighty sixty percent. They know they can have a good ad. That's what social media is. Social media is nothing other than seeing what our reaction to things are and how susceptible we are

to narratives, false stories that lead them down there. COVID was the bell weather for this to actually have people walk down aisles because it had a arrow on it. That's where we're at. You think like they laughed at that. They were like, wow, we're more ahead of this than we thought because we've dumbed down this public so much. Yeah, it was all those things. And you know, the Spars document was even more arguably prophetic than even Event to A one. But there was a whole series of these.

I did a really deep, deep dive on all the different documents and war games that came out. There was Clayed X, there was Crimson Contagion, and there was you know, Event to A one. There was the Sparse document, on and on on and this this makes sense too when you study you know, things like nine to eleven or the London seven seven event drills. They don't just provide information, research and data, they also can provide

cover for the actual event at times too. So I think you're right to jade Helm, if you remember, in my opinion has always been that jade Helm was a lot of research and data to see how people would react in this kind of a you know, big event scenario, kind of continuity of government collapse scenario REX eighty four. Going all the way back to the Reagan era, there have been many of these drills and preparation scenarios for a mass event of some kind. You know. One of the things I do a

lecture through the writings of these very people. So you know, a lot of people don't know that most of these power elite published books and they basically say what their worldview is, what their plans are. Now, maybe not every single operation is written about or plan that we that we know of or is mentioned in their books. But when we Rebresentske, when we read a Rockefeller, when we read the Huxley's Virtual Russell Jaquat Lee, Arthur Kessler,

Carol Quigley, I mean, on and on on. I've lectured through about fifty or sixty of these texts. We see how open they are and they don't really seem to care that people know what they're up to or what their

plans are, and they're they're very candid about it. So yeah, what if they openly write about it and it's kind of hidden in plain sight, so to speak, it's not surprising that they would have public meeting places where they go and discuss these things, like, yeah, they used to keep them in the shadows, though right now it's very like weft is a very open place. Before you know it. I did a deep dive and in my film and through the Club of Rome and where the genesis of that was.

But it was always deep population. I mean, that's always what it was over about. It was always too much of us. And if they would promote their plans through an ice age, so be it. Promote them through climate change, global warming, so be it. They always can kick the can to whatever agenda they want and whatever way they want to push it.

And never before did these people when they were conceding these plans. Who knows how long ago it was that an internet would be invented where we'd be able to talk with someone like Jay in another state and start to think about this and come up with our counter thought about what these oligarchs and world elites

are trying to do to us certain those matter. On a podcast in England, was describing the way the world, like especially the neo cons think they justify a lot of their actions traitress actions of that and not people like you and I. We just can't be trusted to be able to to go through information because they're so easily manipulated. Like that's one of the excuses. Well, you don't have it is the degree? Well he does, he has all the degrees. He went, he went there the proper channels. But

me where I don't have that degree? Yea, yeah, but there you go. But it is it's something amazing that we get to like, that's the that's the play they did. So my thing is they have to do something with the Internet. There's too much freedom to and like Elon grabbing Twitter at the time, that's a blessing right to think that. But then I think, what if they just like categorizing and putting everybody in their little thing because they'll ultimately have that you know, uh, what is that the the

fuck crime? Come up? You know? I mean if we're looking at films and we're seeing this predictiveness of it, which they actually talk about and have arrested people with that already in other countries. That are we just feeding

the beast to come to our own demise and put handcuffs on us. I don't know, but I'm I want to keep talking about it, and I know I want to keep talking to people like Jay and fight these bastards who are doing this because they are evil and they hate humanity so much that they do these things too much, and and for my kids sake, I'm going to keep doing this, and I champion people like Jay, and I'm glad I can be on his side and talk these things and know that we're doing

something at this time, at this moment than just trying to get paid and live on the beach and just put everything out. This is a real battle, no doubt, Absolutely I appreciate that. Yeah, I think you know, if you look at classic movies and Hollywood that illustrate this point. You could look at something like Gaslight, which is a George kuk or if nowhere you have the principle of a guy who's really trying to deceive a woman out of her wealth, and he uses all these kind of what you would think

would be insane techniques, but they work to drive the woman insane. It's a really great analogy for the way that the psychopathic system and the elites that you're talking about, the way they relate to us. Just look at them like that psychotic character who's constantly gas lighting and doing all these tricks to try to really, you know, screw up the mind of the public, to

really make them pliable and to go along with whatever they want. And we know what they want, which is ultimately a massive depopulation, and that it would include everything from the messing with our biology, our gender, all the way to you know, the potentiality of trying to inoculate everybody with some with something or a pandemic or whatever. All of those things are in the cards, and they'll throw out any of these things because they're committed to that agenda.

As you know, if you've studied the Club of Rome and those documents, the Kissinger twenty twenty five report under Reagan excuse me, excuse me, under a Carter Global twenty twenty five, that was you know, Kissinger basically laying out the American government's full adoption of the Malthusian dysgenics agenda. So prior to that, they were very wealthy people in America that had funded and promoted a lot of the dysgenics eugenics ideology, but have been adopted as policy.

Really Intel Kissinger and Kissinger was doing that twenty one agenda twenty thirties, kind of going up that line, right. Yeah, those are more updated, yeah, updated versions of what Kissinger was up to in the seventies, Lace mid late seven, well class, that's his protege, Klaus Schwa. Kissinger's protege is Klaus Swamp, which you can see in the grace where you said to Johnny Bedmore's great reporting and they've had more and Whitney Webbit pointed out that

that was a CIA Harvard project to set up. Yeah, speaking with them, I mean the Whitney is just like and she's such a she's Peter, you know. Sitting with there for three hours is like rapid fire and you just got to keep going trying to keep catch up with her. But two other a freedom fighters and are such great allies to have in this. Well. I appreciate your time today, man, I really do. Is great talking to you. I've been one to talk to you for a while,

so I really appreciate your time with us. Yeah, thank you. And if people are interested in more in depth analysis of I think I covered probably fifty sixty different films. You can get Esoteric Hollywood one and two at my website Jason Alsis dot com and I go into quite a bit of depth there. Well, thank you so much for joining us, Jay, And that's can you set a website one more time for the audience, but they can

find you Jay's Analysis dot com. That's my website. I have all of my stuff there in my archive, lectures and talks and the Global Lead series that I mentioned. I host the fourth hour of Box showns pretty much every Friday. And then yeah, in the shop, you can get the signed

copies of my books. Lleen. Well, thank you so much, Jay, and God bless you just said it's an honor you fight with you take care likewise, Absolutely, that was an awesome conversation and it's gonna tee us up quite well for the follow on now as we go into the depths of the lies that are presented to the public. Matt, I really appreciate Jade, but you know what I appreciate more. We got our first sponsor. This is is pretty good. This is a big deal. Okay, the

show one episode in, We've got our first sponsor. It is Augusta Gold. Now, Augusta Gold is a precious metals company. They offer gold backed iras. I know for Augusta. I've seen them sponsor several shows, including the Doctor Jane Ruby Show and look for Augusta. They don't just pick anybody to put their money behind and put their sponsori behind. If you want to check them out, go to dyed suddenlygold dot com that's died suddenlygold dot com.

What you can look into is both buying precious metals and looking into switching over your IRA accounts, which the federal government right now is looking into taxing. All right, the government, they're out of money, they're broke. They're even spending money on things more than just missiles in Ukraine. They might be spending it on death squads in the United States of America. We know they're targeting you and I. We know that they definitely discussed they're disgusted by

us, and they've been discussing dealing with us for quite some time. You need to protect your wealth for your future, you need to go to die suddenlygold dot com check out a gust the precious most. If you call them, we get credit. So please do, please do go to the website and call the number that's on the page. Again it died suddenlygold dot Com. And hey, it's it's just kind of a very celebratory thing, Matt

that we got our first sponsor. Pretty cool, right, Look, I am super excited, and uh, this show only goes on because uh, you know, we got to pay for these big fancy screens. So anyway, thank you so much to them, and uh, bring some more. We we will. We will promote things that we believe in. And that's the that's the big thing, because I will. I want the companies that we're you know, together with to to do well because we believe in them.

And uh, I wouldn't take my money out of any market like your four to one K And who knows what will happen with any of these businesses. I know gold been here forever, so sure precious metals are are considered to be eternal wealth. And we know that the streets of New Jerusalem are paved with gold. That's true. Yeah, they're not paid with dollars.

But we also know that the government is trying to find creative ways to get rid of the wealth of the generation that's resisting and the generation that supported you and I. And you know, one thing we went into a Jay. You know, the government. First of all, we don't trust them, not even as far as we could throw it, okay for that, And we talked about this about how the predictive programming and how the revelation of the

method. They believe in that so much so that they even produced a card deck that is either just a game or it has some a little bit of a like a demonic prophetic This is the thing. We don't know where it comes from, and that like you know, Jay talked about the guy who who made it, and look, we we're not sure, but we do know these things pop up and we have to notice and take notice of these these abnormalities. That this card was made in nineteen ninety four, resembles Trump

and now has the undername. The usage of it is to use it in the game for a sniper attack. Okay, it's it's surreal. And there's another one charismatic leader that looks like President Trump at a rally. So they could have chosen any hair color. They chose the wavy gold. He's got the beautiful gold, charismatic leader. Here's another one. We found the Pentagon. Uh. That's incredibly eerie, you know. And I need to pull up the World Trade Center one. Yeah, yeah, because the Trade Center

one was very interesting. The Trade Center one actually showed the burning towers the same way that we saw them a nine to eleven in two thousand and one, but it didn't mention plans. Nonetheless, looks just like the scene, the infamous scene that we saw on that fateful day in New York. And again, an event that undoubtedly changed this world. I remember coming to this country prior to nine to eleven, and the country was just a completely different

place. You know this. I'm speaking the choir of this. And there's another event that is going to change our world, and of course it is the assassination tenth on President Trump. Well, I'll tell you it's a miracle. President Trump's alive. And what we know right now is the official story regarding the young man that is said to have taken the shot to try to end President Trump's life. Well, he's twenty years old. His name is

Thomas Matthew Crooks. You've probably heard that name a million times at this point. Did you know? He woke up on Saturday with a glint in his eye, a murderous thought apparently at his foot. He put on ten shorts, He put on a T shirt with a name of a progum YouTube channel. He grabbed his dad's AR fifteen. Not an expensive one at that, just a very simple one. Got into his car, a man of sorts loaded up with a explosives and then he drove about an hour to a field

where President Trump was hosting a rally. This is Butler, Pennsylvania. Upon arriving at the event, he had a rifle on a backpack. He went out and walked the grounds. He pulled out a laser range fighter. We found out, and he's looking at different distances, looking at the building which he's or portally used to it again plant this shot and plant the attack. And then approximately thirty minutes after scouting out the locations, he was spotted actually

on site by a local sniper team. It took two photos of him and upon identifying him as someone who's carrying a laser range fighter on the event of a rally. They said, this guy is a suspicious character. Let's keep an eye on him. They took photos of him, they circulated amongst the Secret Service and the local police, and then they saw this man had climbed onto a building using an air conditioningit we're finding out now he then decided to

place himself here. It ended up being the same building. That's the staging location, local police. Very odd situation, Matt and that he bear crawled in the position. The rest is kind of history. Well, I mean, we now have okay, JFK, you had the Supruter film and they overanalyze and analyze it. They interviewed a bunch of witnesses. A lot of those witnesses winded up dead. So now we live in the age of everybody

has a cell phone and all this media is coming out. We now can even time when the shooter was on that roof to when President Trump was shot at. People are screaming it that he's got a gun, he's got a gun. They're not adding up at all. And look, it doesn't take much. We're not going to spend a ton of time on this part of it, because you guys already believe that the guvernment's life. Isn't it crazy that it's almost to the fact of like they accept like this is this isn't

adding up already? Oh sure, Look we're we're veterans at this, all right, We're veterans are dissecting the enemy's agenda their lives. So I'm going to go right to the point on this. There actually was a fella that we saw probably at least one hundred times at various Trump events, various foreign

trips. Yeah, so in twenty eighteen, we covered the rallies, we went to home, so we have a firsthand experience of going through the security, going through all that, right, and you who were about to bring up he was willing to check us in. Usually gave us press passing exactly. He's the one that actually organizes the Trump's events and organizes security. He would head it over to the Secret Service, but he understands the plan,

He understands the way they've secured the president at least three hundred times. This is Andrew Riddau. He didn an interview with in Force and listen, this man is the single most experienced expert on how much security should be at President Trump's rally and how this rally lacked every aspect of security that was needed. After building over three hundred events for the president, you know, doing quite this exact layout, you know, there are some glaring issues that I don't

know why they weren't necessarily addressed. You're exactly right. A roof, especially that close, would normally be manned by you know, at least a counter sniper team, if not also you know, posted agents or law enforcement. You know, they're on that roof and on the ground surrounding that building. You know, they would also normally create visual barriers. You know, if they're not able to incorporate that into the secure perimeter, they would have put

up blocking elements. You know, we've done it time and time again. What is really alarming is he saw the failure at such a level that he was like what happened? Like this should never have happened. So when we look at the official story, right taking the kid did it? Okay, I We'll say, this kid out of nowhere, who was a little scrawny kid, just like the Sandy Hook kid. He came out of nowhere, decided to shoot the president, okay, And he walked around the ground and

no one said anything, and no one tried to stop him. Okay, so he did this, but how did he do it? Like, how was he able to have marksman snipers on him for such a long time, people screaming, and he wasn't taken down. Well, that's the facts of the matter, is that at least two minutes they knew he was on the roof with a gun, two minutes before shooting President Trump. At least thirty minutes before he was, you know, seen on the grounds, They engaged,

they took photos, and they made sure to identify him. That's a thirty minute block before President Trump's even gone onto the podium. Even in the kill zone, we now know a police officer literally got up peaked his head over the top of the roof to look at him. Allegedly, crooks pointed the weapon and the guy dropped down and kind of fled from the situation.

But the worst part is the building itself was the staging ground for the local police who had the basically the responsibility of maintaining that area and keeping it safe. So he was literally on top of the henhouse. The fox was on top of the heathouse. If they were any kind of private contractor, they would be sued for violating and ignoring the most basic concepts of security, preparedness

and maintaining a perimeter. The fact that an armed man with a rifle got within one hundred and forty yards of a Trump rally, was able to lay down after positioning himself for minutes and take multiple aim shots to the point of clipping Trump's ear, killing other people in the crowd is absolutely grotesque. It's either, as I said in a Twitter post, it's either malice or malpractice

gross incompetence. I spent about seventeen years in the military, fourteen of which just about fourteen of which we're at TIERO one special operations unit called JTF two. Our sniper team has the world record for the longest confirmed sniper kill and a huge part of our job while I was there, and while I was a sniper, was doing close protection for VIPs up to and including the Prime Minister when he would go to you know, dangerous countries like Iraq, Afghanistan.

The second I saw that aerial photo of what they were saying happened, immediately made no sense to me. You cannot in broad daylight get onto a rooftop within It looked like maybe a couple hundred yards. If at you can't get into that position with a gun when there's a president speaking, it cannot be done. It's it is quite astounding. And I've spoken to a lot of good friends of mine who are within my sector. You know a lot

of former military guys, a lot of former police guys. I know some former Secret Service guys, and everybody is sort of absolutely wrecking their brains as to how this could have been allowed to happen. Hey, it was going on everybody. I'm here to tell you why the shooting and President Donald Trump yesterday, without a doubt in my mind, was a planned and coordinated attack on the president inside our government, our local agency or police force. Here's

why. My name is Matthew Murphy, and I am a retired Green Beret, retired from this special forces group. But I'm also a Level one sniper, which means that I have graduated the highest level of training for snipers that you can do in special operations. We're training. I'm going to avoid confidential or classified terminology for training in assassinations and counter assassinations for the very reason case

appoint yesterday the shooting and President Donald Trump. So first of all, anywhere the president's going to go, there are teams with a secret services that go out days, if not weeks, not months before the president will ever be at that spot, and they do a site security assessment and they do that with a local police forces and agencies to ensure that every potential security threat or

vulnerability. I think the questions people have right now, either we want an independent investigation first of all, I don't want a nine to eleven commission. No, I don't. I don't want a war report, like like, let's look get a real result. He should hire a zone vesk. We need to get a real uh independent look at this. But I'm almost looking at like Trump is like man is he is? He shaking a little bit to be like I do I need to play ball a little bit, like

it's a weird mindset. Now he got up like a like a complete badass, like a ball should stand it up. That was iconic. But now do you think in the back of his head like, oh man, this is this is a new game. Now. It was not in front of his son, So I think the that's going through his head, and I think his son and his wife Milania, when are reading her statement. It definitely read that she got shook up. She doesn't often make statements in everything

I know. This is like another level, right, This is a level of the game has changed, right, even as much bravado as you want to have, the game's changed, right. But I want to find the truth. That's what I want. The truth. Well, and the sad part is is we may never get the truth. We have to first accept that in regard to some of these events, the cover up again the second

after the shot ragout. I mean, we're now hearing that the FBI has cracked the cell phones and there now figuring out certain things about this fellow. But let's say the first thing is, did you know the way they found out this man's identity Matthew Crooks is that they actually had his DNA on file. We're in the process of doing the confirmation, and once we have the confirmation, will release the name officially to the press. But at this time

we can't give any further information on the potential. No, it's a matter of doing biometric confirmations. So there was no identification on the individual as an example, So we're looking at photographs right now and we're trying to run his DNA and get biometric confirmation on well, they didn't have they didn't have a driver's license DNA. They had his DNA in a file, so when they took a blood sample from them, they wanted to run that and figure out

who he was. That's that is some definite futuristic. Okay, right there, they found the blood analysis right, ran that, but they pinpointed his car there right, the car with explosives. Couldn't they have ran the tags on that? But I mean they weren't right for the blood. I think it's because they were looking around. That's a good point, because they would

have had his vehicle with the driver's plates. That's true. They could have gone that route, but they said the way they did it was through biometric data. Now the other thing too, I know this as a fact. I think it's fair to disclose this because there are several trained snipers now who are speaking out against the official narrative of what's being told. The FBI,

Secret Service and DHS were calling trained snipers minutes after the attack. A couple of my friends got a call and they were asking them specifically, who have you trained recently? Give us the list of everyone you have trained for long range marksmanship, which is odd because you look at the shooting, it technically wouldn't have required a well trained marksman. I initially thought that you definitely have to someone as with expertise to fire from long range, and you saw it.

You actually texted me right after the shooting. I had to tweet up that said, because again I was talking to people who would know it's a sniper from the rear, and everyone at the time was thinking it was a man in the crowd with a handgun, and we just wanted to wait. But the thing is this, you talked to these people minutes after a minute it happened, so they were on the phone that quick to the database of

snipers around the country. And the other part that's weird is you'll hear, as you've heard watching the clip over and over and over of President Trump being shot, they say audibly, after moving President Trump from the podium, that the shooters down. So it is already kind of weird that the FBI, to DHS, the Secret Service would be calling snipers because they why would you need to do that if, again, you know, the guy's dead already.

But it's because they're they're trying to figure this out. And there are a lot of good people in the Secret Service, a lot of good people in governments. Still despite the vaccine man's, despite the DEAI hirings and all these other things that people are really focusing on. What we wanted to focus on is we looked at this. We want to see what the experts are

saying about it, and the experts are not talking about DEI hiring. What they are talking about is how none of this security plan adds up, and also that there might have been other shot locations, other places, and other people that could have been involved. You know, the prienitor is actually established by your threats that are in the area. So if I don't have any threats outside of one hundred yards, okay, fine, I can court on

off a certain area. But if I have a building one hundred and sixty yards perfectly adjacent to the stage, that's an obvious threat, especially when an elevated position that has overwatching me. That's a sniper's paradise. And you know we talk about egoss. You also have which no one talks about, but the water tower, the fire and I just screamed, it's the sniper, it's the sniper. And he was firing down forard the waterpower. And they

had been right by the fence where the other shooter was. There was one I heard in the water tower. There was one buck Bess and still obviously initial reports. But what we do to the gentleman behind me? We were I was one seat, he was to the right of me. He could see the sharpshooter on the behind Trump. He said, the sharpshooter shot to the left. He killed the gentleman in the water tower. Here, he killed the gentleman in the water tower. Here, he killed the gentleman in

the water tower. Here. Like every good conspiracy, there's always a second shooter. This has some credibility, if nothing else. But they're genuine in what they're saying, right, they believe they saw some money in the tower. Corey Mills referenced the tower. So what do we do with this? Well, I think that obviously the eyewitnesses, you know, they were hearing from individuals, you know that there's somebody up with the water tower. They

were hearing that this person had been shot the water tower too. It is chaotic on the ground, so you can't just attribute just to that. But there's a question that was raised by several of those experts is we don't really know yet who was shot, who shot where? And I'll tell you we've got some evidence on this. We're not the only people talking about this. When you first you look at the map, as you see on screen here,

the map is is a little bit daunting. You know, we see that this individual crooks, he was able to get a clear line of shot. Okay, let's look at this. Look at the podium, look at that. Yes, look, President Trump can literally probably sees so the spot. And when he goes to these rallies there's like a long stage. He likes to like look at me, and he's like like pointing to the crowd.

This shot is very like it's foretelling. Right. That is literally the site of the building that the kid was on looking that's where he would have you know, been shooting at. Now we look at the map and that's where that picture we look at Trump, that's where over there is where the kid was up there. We don't have as the tower as a water tower. And the water tower is interesting. We got aerial footage that we can show on this. Now the ARA footage clarly shows a water tower shows the

open grounds. The water tower, as they were talking about in those clips, is a better shot location. We're not here to uh to to dissect where the assassin should have used a better vantage point. Were we are pointing out is that not only was there no one at the top of this building, which was the local staging grounds. By the way, the Secret Service director said, the reason why no personnel were based on top of the shooting

location was because of the sloped roof that people would fall off it. That it's protocol. Apparently it's good enough for the shooter. Though. Now there also was no one placed on the water tower, two places which would have been simple two places that Andrew as he was parting out, or places that it's a normal protocol to place security. So you have to ask why did they not place people there? Could it be to put President Trump in harm's

way? There's no other explanation for this. Now, the other thing with this is that the concept of a second shooter not there. Only people talking about that. International Business Times put out an article more than one shooter. Second Shooter's role in Trump attacks sparks mystery and investigation. Now what this is about is it turns out there was a pretty reppable analysis of the audio of the gunshots. This was done by Catlin Gregorius and Cole Whitecotton from the University

of Colorado's National Center for Media Forensics. Well, they sound very established. Well they got they got a big old title, and the title comes from that. They've done forensic analysis for police and for the FBI on past shootings.

As it turns out this is from them. There were three initial shots that matched a suspected weapon a weapon A, followed by five shots from suspected weapon B. Turns out there was an extra shot from a weapon C. Now why this is important, amb are likely the secret service station and the

shooter, but they have no idea who sees. So this has sparked a very interesting conversation because there's a man who used to serve as the Deputy Undersecretary of Defense in the United States. Big title, big title, Stephan Bryan is his name. He's got a sub stack. He was writing some interesting things here. This is the assassin, the Trump assassin attempt. A serious audited investigation is urgently needed. Now, this man is not a kook.

This man has a record of being a senior government official. He has a lot of interesting things to say in the past about foreign policy. In this case, he has said very specifically that not only should there be an investigation of this, but we need to find out very specifically who shot and when and if there was an unidentified weapon that was used here. We need to do an investigation now. He also said in the subtext something very interesting.

He said, it is worth asking whether Crooks was someone ripe for exploitation. A person without friends can be open to manipulation and can feel a sense of protection. He's talking about the fact this man didn't have any social media. The media has had a hard time even finding anyone to interview who knew him or liked him. You know, even his family was kind of separated from him. Now, mister brand who's the again, the four former deputy undersectory

defense? Uh. He said that there is at least a sub position to be considered that Crooks did not expect to die when he shot at President Trump, that he planned to have a spectacular escape. That's why he had explosives in his vehicle. Nonetheless, all these things point to dare I say, a patsy or a man cheering, candidated or some kind of MK ultra or who knows what, some manipulation of a young man who was trying to find

his way. When we were doing the film with Judith with a kill shot, kill shot with when she said she was with Lee Harvey Oswald months before and was involved in a bio weapon to kill Castro. She was young, very intelligent, susceptible. And it's kind of them now. As as for these shooters, these killers, they kind of get these people who are a

little bit off the beaten path. Nobody liked them. Loaners. Adam Lanza from Sandy Houck was the same kind of nerdy kid, intelligent, might have been on the spectrum of autism and all of a sudden decides to do one of the most horrific things that we have seen. Well, in the odd case of this, there are many parallels. We'll be going into this here of the next next period of time. But one parallel is that they were both stem students, both people in the computer has been the video games a

little bit too. Also, they had nicknames. The thing that's kind of stranger the reality, as it turns out this shooter that took a crack at President Trump, he actually had a nickname in high school. And this nickname was it was school shooter. Oh are you look? Look that might be a name now because I mean, look, that's in the binnacular. It's like we wouldn't have said it because school shooting wasn't sure. But look when I see some suspect kids, I'm like, okay, it looks like a

school shoot. People do say this, people do say this. So he was creepy looking, he had the mo and as again he says, settle to manipulations. As the undersecretary pointed out, the other thing we want to point out here is that video games. You know, I know that the younger folks they kind of glaze over their eyes roll when they hear us. It's true though, and look they will admit to this. At least it makes video games especially violent ones. They make people callous, They make you

acceptable to violence. And it turns out there actually is a video game out there that trains people to kill President Trump. At least makes you kind of say, it makes you normalized him. But this game is more of defending Trump, right, it's not about killing Trump. And here it is, this is called mister President. Yeah. They got Paudie Pie playing the game is to stop the assassination, right, you take a bullet for the president. Yeah, it's like the backwards of it. But what some people do

is they do situations where they're actually killing him. Oh, you can play that role in what you as the bodyguard, you're the inside man. Well yeah, like stopping it so well, but you can flip the role. You can pretend to be the one that's a bodyguard, but then you can also kill him. So didn't see it coming you see, So that it's a very weird thing. The fact that these games existed on There was a story online. We weren't able to verify this, so they've named as a

different person's photo on it. There is a report of an account that was run by Matthew Crooks. Anyone can name a Steam account, that's what this

is platform video games. But nonetheless, on this account it said something along the lines of this has trained me very well for what's to look the It literally had Thomas M. Crooks as the avatar logo of this person, right, and then of course yeah the picture was someone different, but it was his name, and it had like a review of it, right, and it was like I've been planning posted July thirteen to two, like the day of assassination. Right, So but again it's like, this is in this

realm of like predictive programming, you have the ability to do this. This is actually a game like of something that could happen in real life. So who's to know? Who's to say? You know that, we don't know that that wasn't wasn't him now the picture's not him, right, But it's just odd. Again, it's just another possibility, right, we can only it goes as far as our imagination. But this is the world we live in now. You can play a game that you can stop a president assassination.

Well, something in addition to this that we've seen is that our imaginations are sometimes made up of our experiences and sometimes made faked or fabricated experiences. One of the craziest things about our experiences is that if you have the power to beam things into our head through books, through movies, you can manipulate our experiences. You can manipulate our reality. It goes back to that predictive programming went over with Jay Dyer. The predictive programming, I think in regard

to mass shooting, it's been around for a long time. I mean, one of the first big kind of examples this was the book Catcher in the Rye. All right, Catcher in the Rye was a foundational kind of look at a lot of shooters, from JFK to John Lennon to Rebecca Schaeffer. You know, there's examples of each of the shooters in this case reading Catchers in the Rye and being kind of inspired by it. In addition to this, we've seen examples from the government where they tried to create what we consider

to be wind up shooters. You know, the mk ulture program was very real, and the goals of this were to create the perfect assassin, create the perfect spy that they could carry out a horrific act and he wouldn't even realize what he'd done. Now, this would be one thing if it was just inside the fantasy labs of the Pentagon, but it's not. There's been several very public and real examples that involve a Manchurian candidate or an mk ultra

individual man we say mentoring candidate. This is a made up term, but it's of a real concept. They presented on film too. Well. This is again, did the film spark the CIA interest in this matter and they wanted to create this program or was this something in the CIA already and somebody knew about it and wrote a screenplay about it, because two movies have been made about this the manchaeran candidate in nineteen sixty two, it was released.

I have a little clip right here. Why don't we play this clip and see how close to reality this is. I want the nominee to be dead about two minutes after he begins his acceptance speech, depending on his reading time. Under pressure. You are to hit him right at the point that he finishes the raise. Nor would I ask for any fellow American in defense of his freedom that which I would not gladly give myself my life before my liberting?

Is that absolutely clear? Would you repeat it for me? Nor would I ask of any fellow America in defense of this freedom that which I would killed myself my life before my GiB before Okay, creepy, it's crimpy, And and before that part, didn't she also, uh say, you tell them to shoot the guy in the head, said you're gonna shoot the nominee the president whole how she's going to stand up and putting in the air.

Yeah, Well, something like, no, she was gonna get kill him I and then she was going to take over power in this whole thing. So, uh, here's a clip right here. This is from a documentary about the mk Ultra program, So check this out. In nineteen seventy three, the mk Ultra program was terminated and some of the evidence of his activities

was systematically erased. The whole thing was basically discovered because of a whistleblower named John Marx, who wrote the first book really about the program, called The Search for the Manchurian Candidate. There were congressional hearings here in the United States in the mid seventies after it had been exposed, and during those hearings, the CIA finally admitted that this program existed. They admitted that it was probably

not the right thing to do, but they feigned innocence. But you actually so this. She talked to him one point, right, And what did he tell you? He said about that? He said the same thing that he's consistently said. First, you know fifty years that he has no memory of what happened that night. I started searching for coffee. That was all what I wanted to do, and I found them in the kitchen area, but where I don't remember. Some in a kitchen type room. I don't

remember where I thought it, but I remember getting the coup. It was a shining larger and there was a girl there. I don't remember what happened after that. You don't remember. I don't remember. Do you remember anything other than the choking and the commotion. I don't remember that. So that's first hand testimony. I mean, this is who we're talking about this MK Ulture program. When I sat down with the interview with RFK Junior, he

told me it was the CIA. He did it, told me the name with a man who killed his father and told me that he had recently died in the Philippines. So look, we are in a world that this is real, that that we are own government agencies and presidential candidates who happened to be relatives, a son and a nephew of one is saying that inside this government that he wants to be president of, they killed them like this is this is this goes. We have to take some kind of like credence to

this and say is this a possibility? If it is what happened with this one, is it any different? Well? Sure, I think that's when it comes to RFK Junior. You know, it's a it's quite a legacy of again death in that family. And in respect to presidential assassinations, I mean that that was a high profile death. It changed the country, much like what we're talking about here with there's many country changing events that we've got

over today. The concept of these assassins not having control their faculties and being a little bit wild and crazy and unable to recall the heinous act that they've committed. It speaks to what Corey Mills was saying, Carysmon Corey Mills, you know, it's we just don't know much about this individual, the shooter that we're being told, this man that could have changed the trajectory of this

entire nation. What we do know is that when it comes to the government programs, there does exist the ability to manufacture a perfect assassin, someone that won't look the way you think they will. And as you pointed out very aptly, there is a parallel. They're usually nerds, they're usually strawing cast they play videogames, someone who's not an alpha. Right. But here, as you bring up Corey, let's listen to what he said and his you

know, questioning about what's really happening. You know, I sit here and I scratch my head. Don't want to be the conspiracist. You don't want to be that, I'm telling you because that's what that's what it's leaning to you. No, I know. And and that's the issues that you walk this fine balance of you're not trying to be a conspiracist, but you look

as you go how could this have gone? So? But it's one thing if someone on the street says it, it's not that I mean you Cormil's Member of Congress, former sniper you saying it, I mean, it makes my eyebrows go up. What should be said when you say you're walking the line on this intentional what the ditomy an investigation is necessary this point in Congress? Arm services mean, I'll tell you this, a lot of people like

this are like neo conservatives. And if we're going to go there, we have to say who is who is set to benefit if President Trump dies? But it's not just Biden who set to benefit. It is the neo conservative army of the Republic. Okay, there we go. We don't know there's always who gets the benefit more but for him, as a sit in congressman, to even question this and listen to the end and how she abruptly is

like like, what listen to others? You know, I look back at I'm thinking all right, you know, for an individual, if you look at the escalations and how they are trying to approach him, let's just say that. It was like, Okay, first we want to censor in silence you. Then we want to indict and imprison you. Now we're attempting to kill you, and you let's let's slow down, pleas I'm hearing two things from you. I don't want to jump ahead of things, but I'm also

hearing you jumping ahead of things. Well, actually, I'm just looking at all the different possible capabilities. And you know, one of the things as a military remember one of the things we'll wait. But one of the things is a person who's running the Special Operations Committee before one of the people who's actually done this, is that you look at all potential analysis, right that Donald Trump and his team have said, do not no, I agree, dial it back. Do not blame this on Joe Biden. Oh okay,

Well someone is to blame. It's the kid that you think they did it well. And it's both sides are doing this to an extent. Like again, it just did benefit Joe Biden says, and none of us are talking about how poorly he did in the debate, right, And obviously it could benefit him if there had to be a last minute standard candidate. But I'll tell you the people that at least from my view, benefits the most, they're the neo conservatives, the ones that are showing up the RNC, actually,

people like Corey Mills. If he would have been assassinated, if President Trump was assassinated, they would have picked Nicki Haley at the convention literally the following week the convention's happening, and you look at this, this this could have been a legit way to switch out the candidates. I do people don't want to go there right now because it's look, he didn't die, and and look that we don't want to speak on behalf of the congressman. But

they have spoken now. They are pro Ukraine, their pro war. A lot of these people are pro pro Israel. So we look at JFK.

Everybody thinks that Lee Harvey Oswald was a screaming communist, but we know from firsthand account interviews with people who knew him, who slept with him, even that he was a right wing, very conservative, and was angry that they didn't go and finish the job with castro Oswell's sheep dipping his His being portrayed as a communist was done out of Guy Banister's office, so he was sheep dipped for months as a communist by giving literature Lee hand this out today,

this is your assignment. I came across the fact that Oswald, a private in the Marines, had taken a Russian examination, and I knew the privates did not take Russian examinations unless they were to connected with intelligence. So that caused me to be curious about five point forty four Camp, which was the address stamped on one circular that they gave out one time before. Obviously Banishter

told them Lee no more addresses. I saw him one time with a man by the name of Guy Banister. And what Guy's role was in all of this. I really don't know. That goes flies one hundred percent of what the narrative we've been taught. We live in a world that the truth is somewhere in the middle. It's usually not given to us in black and white. But as he was saying, we got to look at both sides that what you just said, No one wants to go there on the right,

like, are you kidding me? But JFK wanted to get out of Vietnam, you know, LBJ he benefited extremely well from staying in office. That would be a party on party hit. Everything's everything's in possibilities. Why because things don't add up? Oh, because they let a kid go on a building that was the exact place where you put a sniper and had three minutes on him and let him take shots. We think back to many of the most recent mass shootings and each of them have had a former FBI handler.

They've had fore knowledge. The Parkland shooter, for example, was visited by a sheriff, and he pulled a gun on a sheriff. Okay, and that was still Darkland. Weird thing to interview with the girl right after it happened, since she was running down the hallway with him. Then as I was going down the stairs, I heard it a couple shots fired. Everyone

was freaking out saying that it was a gun. And as we were walking the whole class together, I actually was speaking to the suspect, Nicholas's curis, and as I was speaking to him, he seemed very I don't know what the word I want to say is, but he was trouble in middle school. So I kind of joked to him about it and said, I'm surprised you weren't the one who did it, and he just gave me a

huh. So, uh, that's really what happened. You were walking down the hall, he had already fired at that time, Yes, sir, with him. Weren't you scared in the moment. I wasn't because there was obviously deaf shooter involved. But oh you think he was not the only one? No, definitely not. Why do you say that, because when shots were fired, I saw him after the fact, so and the shots were coming from the other part of the building, so there definitely had to be

and seeing another shooter coming after them. Sure, this is where we're getting to, like the fog of war and a lot of things. Even those people they might have heard the tower, We don't know. Things are such an at I don't know is because you do hear these clips come out and they don't go with the narrative. They're trying to force down the public.

Well, there's millions of people that have been questioning this matter. I think their guts, their instincts, their discernment, or from the get go were being set off. You know what was trending the day of assassination Sandy Hook? I remember I think I text you and said, Sandy Hook is trending right now, and you have to say why? Why? I mean,

it's almost a word. You can't even say anymore, those two words, right, Sandy Hook, because what happened with Alex right, that was like you talk about this and you're done, right, But it was trending for a reason because they don't believe the narrative. And there was a young kid who was kind of autistic, didn't get along with anybody outsider, who all of a sudden started wanted to do something so crazy like this. Well, to this day, we don't know what Adam Lanza's motive was because he's dead,

right, he's killed. Same with this fella, We're never gonna know what crooks really thought wanted to do. Didn't leave a manifesto behind, at least not yet, and he's dead. He was killed and right, no social media, no social media. No one knew the kid. His parents never talked to anybody, His uncle never talked to his grand to his nephew or his brother. It's like these people live in in a void. Right. Well, you, you and I are thought criminals in this because we

refuse to forget things that don't add up. The same way these experts we just played are pointing out some very credible holes in the official story and again that this can't be an aptitude. Okay, it's the same way that we don't forget some very glaring issues with the last major incident that paralleled this. Now when it came to Sandy Hook, I cannot forget it. Can I get out of my head that there were armed men in the woods. Yeah. As we were putting this show together, we both were like, do

you remember hearing the live police scanners saying there's people in the woods. Yes, And I'm gonna remind you of this, folks. It was not a manifestation or your imagination. If you look this up and you tried to do some search your own Google, what you will likely find is that all they weren't armed, or it was ah, it was a mistake, or it was some kind of miscommunication. No, the truth was there were men, at least one man armed by the wood. Wooded a reportedly there was multiple

men going by the school. And lastly they were even arrested and held. And someone even spoke to that individual and the person spoke back and said it wasn't. There's footage of them, as we can show right here. This was live footage of these men who they now they weren't. They were taken to the custody, right, at least one they were detained, right,

and they were. This whole thing was so odd, and that's why I think that's why they threw the book at Alex because I mean, don't question this one, but there are some weird things that happen with this, okay, So why can't we just ask the question. I'm not saying anything definitively, but for sure there are eyewitnesses who saw people coming out of the building, and there was police scanners who said there were two men running into the

woods. So let's play this saw him two shutters running pass the building past the gym, which would be rear, two shutows running pass the building. Those reports too, shoes, shadows running past the building. Then you cut to this. These were the men who were running in the woods apprehended. And then there was a testimony of a kid. I say testimony. There was a reporter, they were asking questions. There was a kid, and then there was another man who actually spoke to the guy who the guy spoke

to him. So what's what's the show them this to the firehouse. There's a man pinned down to the ground with handcuffs on. They did walk a guy out of the woods. I saw him walk a guy out earlier with handcuffs. He walked by us and said he didn't do it. It was

a grown man, A grown man. Yeah, he's sitting in the front of the police car over there now, So I mean he didn't ever gut no, I didn't see any gun, just had him handcuffs him and he walked by us and looked into a parent's eyes and said, I didn't do it. How is he dressed camo pants with a dark jacket. You know what's so interesting about that is that that man was clear to say that he wasn't armed. And you know, you look at and you see this.

This is listed among one of the conspiracy theories that you can't talk about now It took a little bit of digging, but we have found the definitive proof that he was indeed armed. Now it's very odd. This has took us going to the way back time machine. By the way, I don't know much longer way back time machine. I don't know how long the Internet's gonna last. I'm pretty sure they don't want us to be able to look these kind of things up. This is the New Town b It's been around since

eighteen seventy seven. You know a search engine. I found it on HANDIX. I didn't go to Rush one. I went to the Rush one and we found that on there. So this was posted December twenty seventh, twenty twelve. Now this is an article. You wouldn't think that this would have any information of note about what we're talking about now because of the title Police

union seeks funding for trauma treatment. They're talking about how a lot of the mergency personnel who responded, you know, out to the twenty eight deaths of you got to get the pockets Fat Tragedy Council. They have PTSD all kind of stuff. So they say this a lot buried at the bottom of the

article scrall all the way down right. Here, a man with a gun who was spotted in the woods near the school in the day of the incident was an off duty tactical squad police officer for another town, according to the source. And it's dead there. That's it's literally So I don't want puts out for just the second. Here we're first told it was like a hunter.

Right, you're told not to even question it to begin with. But this is just like the the inconsistencies in Pennsylvania with President Trump, and usually the truth comes out right afterwards, right, I want to say the most information, right, you're just like before they come in and kind of like scrub everything and that kind of comes out for the interviews on second, and YouTube's crazy with their algorithm now goes right to the Big four of CNN for

like these you don't get weighted. You can't get those like on the ground things. Now X you can, Right, That's the beautiful thing that you have that ability. But YouTube used to be like that you could upload, but now you search something and goes right to the narratives that they want. Right, But this was stuck at the bottom of the page and stuck way

back in the way back time. Machine. It's a smoking gun. And this is why, first of all, off duty tactical squad police officer from another town, not for San Dirk, not for New Town, for another town. That's the first thing. Two, he's armed, he has a gun. Why wasn't he responding inside there? Why would he be in the woods and not in the building trying to kill the little kid who was shooting

other little kids exactly. And the other thing too is we were told and you if you look this up, I'm telling you, folks, what you will find is, Oh, there was a hunter, unarmed hunter who's apparently gonna behind elementary school. Yeah, and how is he gonna kill the barrel of the gonna straggle it? Okay, who does that? But here's the point. It's odd. It's already odd for someone with a weapon to be by a school, but on the day of the worst mass shooting in US

history this place. That is crazy. So there was a really odd situation that happened in January twenty thirteen. This is at the beginning of the year. This is right after the shooting and Sandy Hooks Sandy Grin happened in December of twenty twelve. So This is again January twenty thirteen, a school with about two hundred and eighty students in Giles County. This is in a completely different states in Virginia, in Narrows, Virginia, they called off school.

They canceled school and the day they're supposed to come back. Now, the reason they did this is there was an interesting article had been posted by a sleuth online named the next school massacre target and it had named this school in Giles County as the location of the attack. Now, the county sheriff said, we had to take this as serious information. We had to cancel school.

And they also mentioned in this in this article Matt from w DBJ seven that it was in relation to the Colorado movie theater shooting that it happened the previous month. So you remember there's a lot of shootings that were happening in quick secession, and then what was happening after it was calls for God guns, yes exactly, which, by the way, right after President Trump was shot, the first thing that came out from Biden administration officials was we got

to do something about these guys. Look, they gave up very quickly on that those shootings were happening, the one live on TV with the news anchor and all. It was like one after the other, and you know, it was like that's where I was like, man, there has to be something to this because they have a motive right afterwards, and that's to take your guns away, because ultimately in their plan, they have to take your freedom to protect yourself from tyranny. Yes, their plan is to disarm.

Their plan is to take away the tools of resistance. Now, this article got a little weird because again this is right on the heels of Sandy Hook and you're asking, why is another school trying to shut downs? They thought the whole school is gonna have another mass shooting. The reason why they thought this map because there was a scene in the movie Batman, Dark Knight,

Dark Knight Rising. Now this had come out in July, so it was a summertime movie in twenty twelve, and in that movie there actually was a map. It's in one of the scenes and in this scene it actually had both narrows. The town which this this sheriff was saying also Sandy Hook. So this is very odd if someone made this is a scene from the Dark Knight Rising. Yeah, so it's it happened so quick too, an hour and a half into the movie. But on this map, Sandy Hook.

That's Sandy Hook. So as we move a little forward, they inverted it so we can see it right, Sandy Hook. But okay, this is so crazy movie predictive programming. This happened this, this came out before the jil in July. Joh was when the movie came out. The shooting was in December. Again, again, what are we saying is it's this their their revelation of method. I don't know, I don't know. It's odd, right, what we do know what we do because like, well would

you can't ports? And we were like, no, the sheriff of Giles County so in this scene, yes, in the scene you see Giles as well. So they're like, well, dang, maybe it's the calling card, Like maybe we should pay attention. And that's what we're saying with this whole program today. We have to pay attention to these things because what if it is their way to do it, like they have to let you see it in their predictive program one that we we maybe get conditioned to it.

Two we accept it because that's our reality. Or three this is part of the deal, the pact with the devil. You could say that they have to let you know what happens before they do. Matta, I know you agree with me on this. I think the only true way to protect yourself in this world is to be protected by the blood of Jesus Christ. Look, there is literally no body armor, no secret service detail, there's nothing. That's why the truth is like we search for the truth in the mire

of all this stuff. But whenever people come to me and they're like, hey, I got the vaccine and I'm scared, I tell them, Look, you took a vaccine that was an experimental vaccine that had dire consequences. It was made to do what it's doing. Give your life to Christ. Come to Christ. Even if the worst happens for you on this earth that you die, the best thing will happen to you live eternity with Him. There is truth. There is ultimate truth. In his name's Jesus. With

the shooting, we're seeing people say God had his hand in there. Absolutely what a world we live in if he hadn't made that turn. We just you know, he made the tour. God moved them. We don't know divine intervention possibly, but we me and you know that, we do this because we love Christ's children, that's it, and we want everybody to be saved. And look, truth tellers at this day and age are fear and far between because it's not popular. It's not popular to tell the truth.

It's not popular to go after and try to dissect and make sense of the craziness of this world. But nonetheless, the Lord has placed this in a very interesting position, a very important position at this time, and as we will continue to do, we will expose to their agenda. Thank you for being part of the agenda.